A trust modification petition can be the most effective way to update or correct an existing trust when circumstances change or when a trust document does not reflect current wishes. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in Westlake Village and across Los Angeles County evaluate whether a petition to modify a trust is appropriate, prepare the necessary legal filings, and navigate the procedural requirements. Whether you are addressing clerical errors, changing trustee assignments, adjusting beneficiary designations, or responding to new family developments, a carefully drafted petition protects your long term plans and helps prevent future disputes among heirs and beneficiaries.
Many people assume trusts are fixed documents, but in practice trusts are adjusted for many reasons over time. A trust modification petition comes into play when a trust is irrevocable, when beneficiaries contest changes, or when court approval is required to address ambiguous language or mistakes. The petition process involves preparing legal pleadings, providing notice to interested parties, and demonstrating to the court why the modification is appropriate under California law. Our goal is to guide clients through each step with clear communication about likely timelines, potential outcomes, and the documentation that will support a successful request for modification of a trust.
Filing a trust modification petition can provide definitive legal authority to change trust terms when informal amendments are insufficient or when the trust is irrevocable. The petition clarifies intentions, corrects drafting errors, and resolves conflicts that could otherwise result in lengthy disputes. For families facing changes like divorce, remarriage, the death of a trustee, or significant changes in assets, a petition can secure the intended distribution plan and protect beneficiaries’ interests. Additionally, a successful petition can help avoid uncertain probate outcomes, preserve tax planning structures where appropriate, and restore trust documents to alignment with the settlor’s present wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across Los Angeles County with a focus on estate planning and trust administration matters. Our team provides hands on guidance for trust modification petitions, first advising whether a straightforward amendment, trust restatement, or a formal court petition is necessary. We emphasize clear client communication, careful document review, and thorough preparation of court filings and notices to beneficiaries. Clients receive practical, locally focused representation in Westlake Village and throughout California designed to preserve family intent, limit conflict, and help trusts function as intended when circumstances change.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing seeking court approval to change an existing trust’s terms when the trust cannot be altered by simple amendment or restatement. Common reasons include correcting drafting mistakes, addressing changed family relationships, clarifying ambiguous provisions, or modifying trustee powers. The petition must explain the requested changes, provide legal grounds under California trust law, and demonstrate that the proposed modification reflects the settlor’s intent or is warranted by changed circumstances. This process can involve notifying beneficiaries and other interested parties and may require a hearing before a judge.
Not every change requires a petition; revocable trusts are often modified by the settlor without court involvement, while irrevocable trusts or contested situations commonly require a petition. The court considers factors such as the settlor’s original intent, whether the proposed modification is consistent with that intent, and the rights of current beneficiaries. Preparing a persuasive petition means collecting relevant trust documents, records of asset transfers, correspondence that supports the requested change, and a clear explanation of why a court order is necessary to effect the modification.
A trust modification petition is a request filed with the probate or superior court asking for judicial authorization to alter a trust’s terms. This remedy is used when the trust instrument itself does not allow the requested change or when parties disagree about the trust’s meaning. The petition outlines the reasons for modification, cites legal authority, and includes proposed language for the revised trust terms. Notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is typically required so they can object if they believe the modification is improper. The court then evaluates the petition and may grant the requested relief if it aligns with applicable legal standards and the settlor’s intent.
Filing a trust modification petition involves several essential steps: identifying interested parties, preparing a clear statement of the requested changes, compiling supporting evidence such as the original trust and related documents, and serving notice in accordance with California procedure. The petition must explain why the change is necessary and how it preserves or restores the settlor’s intent. The court may require a hearing and, in some cases, additional documentation such as witness declarations or a proposed order. Attention to procedural detail and careful factual presentation increase the likelihood of a timely resolution.
Understanding the vocabulary used in trust modification proceedings can reduce confusion. Terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, amendment, restatement, irrevocable trust, revocable trust, and notice are frequent in filings and court orders. Knowing what each term means helps clients follow the process, understand their rights, and communicate effectively with counsel. The glossary below defines commonly encountered words and phrases so that persons involved in the petition process know what to expect at each stage, from filing through a possible hearing and court order implementing the modification.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and initially transferred assets into it. Their documented intent is central to any petition to modify the trust, because California courts evaluate proposed changes against what the settlor intended when the trust was made. Evidence such as the original trust language, related estate planning documents like wills or powers of attorney, and contemporaneous communications can all be relevant to establishing intent. When a settlor is unavailable to speak, courts rely on written records and legal standards to determine whether a requested modification aligns with the settlor’s objectives.
An irrevocable trust typically cannot be altered or revoked by the settlor without judicial approval or the agreement of beneficiaries, making a petition often necessary to implement changes. Irrevocable trusts are commonly used for asset protection, tax planning, or specific distribution goals, and modifying them requires clear legal grounds. Courts assess whether a requested change respects the trust’s purpose and beneficiary rights, and modifications may be allowed when circumstances have changed significantly or when the settlor’s intent can be better fulfilled by a proposed amendment.
A revocable trust allows the settlor to change terms, remove or add beneficiaries, or revoke the trust while the settlor is competent. Because these trusts are amendable by the settlor during their lifetime, petitions to the court are less common unless the settlor is incapacitated, deceased, or there is disagreement among interested parties. When modifications are made privately while the settlor is alive and competent, the trust is typically updated through formal amendment or restatement rather than a judicial petition, keeping the record of changes clear and avoiding court involvement.
Notice refers to the formal process of informing beneficiaries and other interested parties that a petition has been filed so they have an opportunity to object. Interested parties commonly include current beneficiaries, successor trustees, the settlor if alive and incapacitated, and sometimes creditors. Proper service of notice is a procedural requirement in trust modification proceedings, and failure to provide notice can jeopardize the petition. Providing complete and timely notice helps ensure the court can consider any objections and issues a valid, enforceable order if the modification is approved.
When considering changes to a trust, the practical choices are usually a simple amendment, a full trust restatement, or a court petition to modify the trust. An amendment updates specific provisions and is suitable when the settlor is available and the trust is revocable. A restatement rewrites the trust in full while preserving its original date and often provides clarity for significant changes. A petition becomes necessary when the trust is irrevocable, when the settlor cannot act, or when beneficiaries dispute proposed changes. Each path has different procedural requirements, costs, and implications for notice and potential objections.
A limited amendment is often appropriate when the changes are narrow and uncontroversial, such as correcting a typographical error, clarifying ambiguous language, or updating a contact detail. If the settlor is able and willing to sign an amendment and the trust is revocable, the update can be documented without court involvement. This approach is faster and less costly, and it maintains clear records showing the settlor’s direction. In straightforward cases, avoiding a petition reduces formality and helps preserve family privacy while still ensuring the trust functions as intended.
Sometimes a trust only needs administrative updates like changing a trustee’s contact information, updating how distributions are made, or changing an agent for tax matters. When these changes do not alter the distribution scheme or affect core beneficiary rights, a short-form amendment or a certification of trust can be sufficient. These small adjustments keep the trust current and can usually be completed without court supervision, provided the settlor has the authority to make such changes and interested parties are not contesting the revisions.
A comprehensive legal approach is necessary when the trust is irrevocable or when beneficiaries dispute a proposed change. In these situations, a petition to the court provides a formal mechanism to resolve disputes, clarify unclear provisions, or change trustee authority in a way that is legally binding. Preparing a persuasive petition requires careful factual development, citation to relevant law, proper notice to interested parties, and readiness for a hearing. Comprehensive representation helps ensure procedural compliance and a cohesive presentation of the reasons supporting the requested modification.
When proposed modifications affect substantial assets, complex ownership structures, or tax planning mechanisms, filing a petition ensures the court can approve the changes in a way that addresses all legal and financial implications. This is often true for modifications involving retirement account trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, or other arrangements where beneficiary rights and tax consequences must be weighed carefully. Comprehensive representation coordinates legal analysis with financial and tax considerations to produce a modification that reflects the settlor’s intent and protects the beneficiaries’ interests.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification brings thorough planning, careful drafting, and court approval when needed, which reduces the risk of later disputes. By documenting the basis for changes, securing judicial authority, and properly notifying interested parties, the resulting order or amended document carries the force of law and reduces ambiguity. This level of care is particularly valuable when family dynamics are sensitive, assets are significant, or beneficiary expectations differ. Comprehensive work can provide peace of mind by creating a clear, enforceable record of the settlor’s current intentions.
Comprehensive representation also helps ensure compliance with California procedural requirements, including proper service, timely filings, and preparation for hearings. Addressing each legal and factual issue upfront often shortens the overall timeline because fewer follow up motions or disputes arise. In addition, coordinated legal work can integrate necessary related documents such as a certification of trust, pour over will, HIPAA authorization, or powers of attorney so that the estate plan remains consistent across instruments and administrative transitions are smoother for trustees and families.
When a court issues an order approving a trust modification, it creates clear legal authority for the new terms, which decreases the likelihood of later challenges. This formal approval protects trustees acting under the revised provisions and signals to beneficiaries and financial institutions that the changes are legitimate. Having a clear record reduces delays in administration and helps trustees carry out their duties with confidence. For families seeking to minimize conflict and preserve assets for intended beneficiaries, a court approved modification can be a decisive step toward stability.
A comprehensive approach ensures consistency across all estate planning documents, such as revocable living trusts, pour over wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives. Coordinated updates reduce gaps and contradictions that might otherwise prompt disputes or require additional court action. When trust modifications are considered alongside related instruments like irrevocable life insurance trusts or retirement plan trusts, the whole estate plan functions more smoothly, assets transfer as intended, and trustees and family members have a clear roadmap for fulfilling the settlor’s wishes.
Before filing a petition, gather the original trust document, any amendments or restatements, related estate planning documents like wills or powers of attorney, and records of asset transfers into the trust. Documentation showing the settlor’s intent, such as letters, emails, or meeting notes, can be persuasive when explaining why a modification is necessary. Having a complete set of documents reduces delays, helps identify potential conflicts among beneficiaries, and ensures the petition is supported by the best available evidence in court and in communications with other interested parties.
When a modification affects assets subject to tax rules, retirement accounts, or life insurance trusts, coordinate with financial advisers and tax professionals to understand the consequences of proposed changes. A petition prepared without attention to tax implications or beneficiary income needs may lead to unanticipated results. Integrating legal strategy with financial planning helps protect assets, ensures distributions meet intended goals, and reduces the risk that a modification will create new administrative burdens or unintended tax liabilities for beneficiaries.
People seek trust modification petitions for many reasons: to correct errors in the original document, to address changes in family circumstances such as divorce or remarriage, to update trustee appointments, or to resolve ambiguities that interfere with administration. When a trust is irrevocable or when beneficiaries disagree, a petition provides a legal avenue to make necessary changes while protecting the rights of interested parties. The petition process also ensures that modifications are formalized by the court, which can be helpful for trustee authority and dealings with financial institutions.
Another reason to consider a petition is to reconcile trust terms with changes in law, tax planning needs, or asset types. Life events like births, deaths, or the addition of significant assets may make prior provisions obsolete or impractical. A petition creates a record reflecting current circumstances and provides judicial backing for updates intended to carry out the settlor’s objectives. For families concerned with preventing future litigation or confusion, the court’s review and approval can be an effective way to secure long term clarity.
Typical situations prompting trust modification petitions include attempts to change an irrevocable trust, disagreements among beneficiaries about the meaning of trust language, the discovery of drafting errors, or the need to change trustee powers when a trustee has become unable or unwilling to serve. Other common reasons are tax law changes that affect trust administration, the need to add or remove beneficiaries due to family shifts, and circumstances where assets intended for the trust were not properly transferred and court action is needed to remedy the matter.
When trust language is unclear or contains internal inconsistencies that make administration difficult, a petition can ask the court to interpret, reform, or modify the terms to reflect the settlor’s actual intent. Ambiguities often arise from passive drafting or from changes in circumstances that make original provisions impractical. A judicial determination can prevent divergent interpretations by trustees and beneficiaries and establish a single authoritative construction that facilitates prompt administration and reduces the risk of litigation over distributions.
Life events like divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths can materially alter the settlor’s estate planning goals and make prior trust provisions obsolete. When beneficiaries’ needs or family relationships change, a petition can update the trust to reflect new priorities, add protective clauses for younger beneficiaries, or clarify distribution schedules. Modifications that address family changes help ensure assets are managed and distributed in a way that aligns with the settlor’s current intentions and the family’s present circumstances.
Drafting errors, omissions of intended beneficiaries, or assets that were never properly titled to the trust can necessitate court action. A petition can be used to correct mistakes that would otherwise frustrate the settlor’s plan or to direct how assets should be treated when transfers into the trust were incomplete. Courts can also approve orders that resolve title disputes, confirm successor trustee authority, or add administrative instructions to facilitate proper management and distribution of trust property.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers local representation for residents of Westlake Village and the surrounding Los Angeles County area. We provide in person consultation and remote support for clients who need to evaluate whether a trust modification petition is appropriate. Our practice is built on practical counsel, attentive communication, and a focus on achieving durable resolutions that align with the settlor’s intentions. Clients receive guidance on necessary documentation, the timing of filings, and strategies to minimize disputes while ensuring proper legal protections are in place.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we blend practical courtroom experience with careful document preparation, saving time and reducing unnecessary conflict. We prioritize direct client contact to gather the factual record needed for a persuasive petition, work proactively to provide clear notice to interested parties, and prepare concise filings that help the court understand the requested relief. Our approach emphasizes realistic assessment of risks and benefits to help clients make informed decisions about whether to seek a judicial modification.
We also assist with ancillary matters that often accompany trust modifications, including preparing related documents such as pour over wills, powers of attorney, HIPAA authorizations, and certifications of trust. Coordinating these elements alongside a modification petition helps prevent inconsistencies in the estate plan and reduces the likelihood of follow up litigation. Our work aims to produce consistent, enforceable estate planning instruments that reflect the settlor’s present objectives and can be administered efficiently by successor trustees.
Finally, we strive to provide cost conscious representation tailored to the complexity of each matter. For simple, unopposed modifications we pursue streamlined solutions that limit time and expense. For more complex or contested matters we prepare thorough petitions and supporting evidence to present a clear case to the court. Throughout, our focus is on clear communication, timely service, and practical outcomes for clients in Westlake Village and Los Angeles County.
Our process begins with a comprehensive review of the trust and related documents to determine whether a petition is necessary and what relief to request. We then identify and provide notice to interested parties, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and file the matter in the appropriate California court. If a hearing is required we prepare a clear presentation of the facts and legal grounds supporting the modification. Throughout, we keep clients informed of deadlines, likely timelines, and strategic considerations to achieve the best possible outcome.
The initial step is a careful review of all trust documents, amendments, and related estate planning instruments along with any relevant correspondence that sheds light on intent. We assess whether the trust is revocable or irrevocable, whether deceased settlor issues exist, and which parties must be notified. This evaluation helps determine whether an amendment, restatement, informal correction, or a court petition is the appropriate pathway. We also identify documentary evidence that will support the petition and outline the procedural steps required for the chosen approach.
Gathering evidence includes locating the original trust, any amendments or restatements, asset transfer records, and communications that show the settlor’s goals. Declarations from witnesses who recall the settlor’s direction and contemporaneous notes can be useful in explaining why a modification is needed. We organize this evidence to present a coherent narrative to the court that demonstrates the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent or is otherwise justified by changed circumstances, increasing the petition’s chance of success.
Identifying who must receive notice is a detailed task that depends on the trust’s terms and California procedural rules. Interested parties typically include current beneficiaries, successor trustees, and sometimes heirs or creditors. Proper notice is essential for the court to proceed; failing to notify a required party can delay the case or invalidate an order. We prepare accurate service lists and handle the logistics of delivering notice to ensure the petition moves forward with procedural integrity and minimal interruption.
Once documents and evidence are assembled, we draft the petition and any supporting declarations or proposed orders. The filing details the requested modifications and provides the court with factual and legal bases to grant relief. We ensure that the petition complies with local court rules, include all necessary exhibits, and request the specific form of relief that achieves the client’s objectives. Accurate filing and timely service of documents help prevent procedural delays and preserve the client’s position throughout the case.
Supporting declarations explain the underlying facts, such as the settlor’s intent, the history of the trust, and the reasons the modification is needed. These declarations are drafted to be concise and persuasive, attaching exhibits like relevant trust provisions and communications. Clear factual statements help the court evaluate the petition without unnecessary hearings. When testimony is required, declarations can sometimes substitute for live testimony to streamline proceedings and reduce the time required to obtain relief.
We file the petition in the probate or superior court with jurisdiction over the trust administration and follow statutory service requirements to notify interested parties. Proper filing ensures the case receives a docket number and scheduling information for hearings. Service methods and timelines are followed precisely to withstand potential challenges based on procedural defects. Our team tracks deadlines, files necessary proofs of service, and addresses any procedural questions raised by the court to keep the case moving forward efficiently.
If the court requires a hearing, we prepare a concise presentation of the facts, statutory support, and proposed language for the modification, addressing any objections that interested parties raise. Hearings vary in length and complexity depending on the level of dispute and the issues involved. If the judge is satisfied with the petition and evidence, the court issues an order approving the requested modifications, which then becomes part of the trust’s administration record and guides the trustee in carrying out the revised terms.
Objections by beneficiaries may be addressed through negotiation, supplemental filings, or argument at a hearing. Where possible, reaching agreements reduces litigation costs and produces outcomes acceptable to interested parties. We work to identify common ground and present compromise proposals that align with the settlor’s intent while accommodating reasonable concerns. If agreement is not possible, we prepare to defend the petition at hearing with focused evidence and legal authority to support the requested modification.
After the court issues an order, we help implement the approved changes by preparing revised trust documents if needed, updating related estate planning instruments, and providing trustees with certified copies of the order and any restated documents. We also advise on communicating the change to financial institutions and other third parties to ensure assets are administered according to the updated terms. Completing these follow up steps reduces confusion and helps trustees act confidently under the court’s direction.
A petition to modify a trust becomes necessary when the trust cannot be changed by the settlor through a simple amendment or restatement, or when parties dispute the meaning of its provisions. Typical situations include irrevocable trusts where the settlor lacks unilateral ability to alter terms, ambiguities in trust language that impede administration, or instances where beneficiaries contest changes. The petition asks the court to authorize a specific change so that the trust can function in a manner consistent with the settlor’s current intent or to resolve an administrative obstacle that prevents proper management of trust assets. Filing a petition also makes sense when there are significant consequences tied to proposed changes, such as impacts on beneficiary rights or interactions with other estate planning instruments. The court’s involvement establishes a formal, enforceable record that protects trustees and beneficiaries by setting a clear standard for administration. When informal approaches are unlikely to resolve the issue or when legal authority is required to effect a change, a petition provides a structured path to a definitive resolution.
An amendment is a direct change made to the trust instrument itself, typically appropriate when the trust is revocable and the settlor is available and competent to sign the amendment. Amendments are generally quicker and less expensive than court petitions and work well for straightforward updates like changing a trustee or adjusting distribution timing. A restatement rewrites the trust in full to consolidate multiple prior amendments while preserving the original trust date, and it too is a non judicial solution when the settlor has the authority to make the change. A petition to modify the trust is a court proceeding used when the settlor cannot unilaterally amend the trust or when beneficiaries dispute the proposed change. A petition seeks judicial approval for the modification and typically requires notice to interested parties, supporting evidence, and possible hearings. Because it results in a court order, a petition can be appropriate for irrevocable trusts, contested matters, or situations requiring formal legal authority to alter trust terms.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies widely depending on the complexity of the issues, the number of interested parties, and whether objections are raised. In uncontested matters where notice periods are satisfied and no hearing is necessary, a petition may be resolved in a few months after filing. More complicated or contested matters can take several months to over a year, especially if discovery or multiple hearings are required. Local court caseloads and procedural requirements also affect timing, so realistic expectations should factor in potential delays. Preparing thoroughly before filing can shorten the process because well organized documentation, accurate service lists, and concise declarations reduce the need for additional submissions. Where disputes arise, negotiating with interested parties to narrow contested issues often leads to faster resolutions than prolonged litigation. Our role includes advising on realistic timelines and taking steps to move the matter efficiently while protecting the client’s legal position.
California procedure requires notice to all interested parties who have a legal stake in the trust’s administration. Interested parties commonly include current beneficiaries, successor trustees, the settlor if alive and incapacitated in certain circumstances, and potential heirs who would be affected by the modification. Proper notice allows those parties to object or consent and is a critical procedural element; failure to provide required notice can jeopardize the court’s authority to grant the petition. Identifying every required recipient of notice involves careful review of the trust document and applicable statutes. We prepare accurate service lists, handle the mechanics of delivery, and file proofs of service with the court. Proper and timely notice reduces the risk of procedural disputes and helps the court proceed toward a resolution with confidence that all interested parties were informed.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed modification and may petition the court to oppose the requested change. Objections can be based on arguments that the modification contravenes the settlor’s intent, improperly affects beneficiary rights, or is procedurally defective. When objections are filed, the court may hold a hearing to weigh competing evidence and testimony. Objecting parties can seek to block the modification or to narrow the scope of changes being proposed. When an objection is anticipated we explore opportunities for negotiation to reach a settlement that avoids a contested hearing. Agreements among beneficiaries or mediated resolutions can often produce mutually acceptable outcomes while reducing cost and delay. If litigation is unavoidable, preparing a strong factual record and legal argument becomes essential to advocate for the modification or to defend beneficiary interests.
Evidence that supports a petition typically includes the original trust document, any prior amendments or restatements, records showing how assets were intended to be held, and communications that reflect the settlor’s wishes. Declarations from witnesses who recall the settlor’s instructions, financial records demonstrating transfers into the trust, and contemporaneous notes can help establish the factual basis for a requested change. When clerical or drafting mistakes are alleged, clear documentary evidence showing the inconsistency or error is particularly valuable. Legal support may also rely on statutory authority and prior case law demonstrating that courts may approve similar modifications under comparable circumstances. Preparing a concise set of exhibits and declarations that tell a coherent story about intent and changed circumstances improves the petition’s persuasiveness and helps the court reach an informed decision.
A court does not always hold an oral hearing for every modification petition; some petitions can be resolved on submitted papers, particularly when no party objects and the petition is straightforward. However, courts frequently schedule hearings when petitions raise factual disputes, when objections are filed, or when additional explanation is necessary to evaluate the requested relief. Whether a hearing is required depends on local court practices, the nature of the issues, and whether interested parties request oral argument or present competing evidence. When a hearing is set, preparation focuses on clear presentation of evidence and legal points to demonstrate why the modification should be approved. If a hearing can be avoided through consent or written submissions, the process is often quicker and less costly. We evaluate the likelihood of a hearing early and prepare accordingly to protect the client’s interests whether the matter proceeds on papers or in open court.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary depending on the complexity of the trust, the number of interested parties, local court filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with straightforward facts have lower overall costs, while contested matters requiring discovery, hearings, or multiple court appearances can be substantially more expensive. Additional expenses can include fees for service of process, charges for certified copies, and costs related to obtaining necessary records or expert analysis where financial or tax consequences are at issue. We provide clients with realistic cost estimates based on the circumstances and advise on strategies to manage expenses, such as pursuing negotiated resolutions where possible and limiting the scope of contested issues. Early preparation and organization of documents often reduce billable time and accelerate court review, which in turn helps control overall costs associated with obtaining a court ordered modification.
After a court approves a trust modification, the order becomes part of the legal record and the trustee should act in accordance with the revised terms. We assist in preparing updated trust documents, certified copies of the court order, and any necessary filings or notifications to financial institutions and custodians. Implementing the order promptly helps trustees carry out distributions and management tasks without confusion, and it reduces the chance of later disputes about authority or interpretation. In addition to practical implementation, an approved order can be used to update related estate planning instruments so the entire plan is consistent. We advise trustees about their duties under the modified trust and assist with any steps needed to retitle assets, update beneficiary designations where appropriate, and confirm that the trust administration proceeds smoothly under the court’s direction.
Yes, modifications to a trust can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change, the type of assets involved, and how distributions are structured after modification. Changes affecting the handling of retirement accounts, irrevocable trusts, or transfers that alter grantor trust status may trigger tax consequences. It is important to consider income, gift, and estate tax issues when proposing substantial revisions and to coordinate with tax advisors to understand potential liabilities before finalizing the modification. When significant tax or financial issues are present, we work with clients and their financial or tax advisors to design modifications that meet estate planning goals while minimizing unintended tax outcomes. Integrating legal and financial analysis into the petition process ensures the court is asked to approve changes that achieve the intended results without creating new tax burdens for beneficiaries or trustees.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas