If you are considering changes to a living trust in Parkwood, understanding the trust modification petition process can help you protect family interests and preserve assets for future generations. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose, we assist clients who need to adjust trust terms, correct drafting errors, accommodate changing family circumstances, or address trustee issues. A trust modification petition asks the court to approve changes when a straightforward amendment or restatement is not possible, and it can resolve disputes or ambiguities that affect distribution, management, or the intent of the trustmaker.
Trust modification petitions are commonly used when beneficiaries, trustees, or the trustmaker encounter unexpected events such as incapacity, remarriage, a death, changes in tax law, or newly discovered drafting problems. The petition process can clarify intentions, adjust trustee powers, correct errors, or modify terms to reflect the trustmaker’s current objectives while remaining consistent with legal requirements. Our office helps clients evaluate whether a petition is appropriate, prepares the necessary documentation, and represents their interests through negotiation or court proceedings when needed to achieve enforceable, durable outcomes.
A trust modification petition can be essential when a living trust no longer reflects the trustmaker’s intentions or when errors and ambiguities create uncertainty. Filing a petition can provide a clear, judicially approved path to amend or interpret trust terms so that assets are managed and distributed as intended. This procedure protects beneficiaries’ interests, clarifies trustee authority, and can address conflicts before they escalate. It also ensures compliance with California trust law while offering a controlled process to implement changes that would be difficult or impossible without court involvement.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services that include trust drafting, trust administration, and petitions for trust modification. Serving Parkwood and the surrounding areas, the firm takes a practical and client-focused approach to resolve trust disputes and pursue needed changes. We emphasize clear communication, careful document preparation, and strategic representation in court when necessary. Our practice addresses common estate planning instruments such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and trust-related petitions to ensure a cohesive plan that responds to changing family and financial circumstances.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate court to change, reform, or clarify the terms of a trust when informal amendment is not possible or when there is disagreement among interested parties. Grounds for a petition can include drafting errors, ambiguous provisions, changed circumstances, or evidence that the trustmaker’s intent differed from the written terms. The petitioning process involves preparing pleadings, providing evidence of the trustmaker’s intent or mistake, serving interested parties, and, if necessary, presenting testimony and legal arguments to the court for a binding resolution.
Not every trust issue requires a petition, and potential petitioners should weigh alternatives such as informal amendments, settlement agreements among beneficiaries, or nonjudicial trust modifications when legally permissible. When a trust includes provisions that restrict changes or when parties cannot agree, a petition ensures that a neutral judicial authority reviews the facts and issues an enforceable order. The court will consider parol evidence, the trust document as a whole, and statutory standards under California law when deciding whether to grant relief requested in a trust modification petition.
A trust modification petition seeks judicial approval to alter trust terms to reflect the trustmaker’s intent, correct mistakes, or adapt the trust to new circumstances. Petitions can request reformation when an error is shown, modification when continuing administration is impracticable or inconsistent with the trust’s purpose, or interpretation when language is ambiguous. The court’s role is to evaluate evidence, apply governing statutes, and issue an order that resolves disputes while maintaining the trust’s integrity. This process provides certainty to trustees and beneficiaries by producing clear directives for future administration and distribution.
A trust modification petition typically requires a clear statement of the relief sought, factual support for the requested change, relevant excerpts from the trust document, and evidence such as declarations or witness statements about the trustmaker’s intent. The petitioner must identify interested parties and properly notify them, allow for responses or objections, and follow procedural rules for filings and hearings. The court may hold a hearing, consider testimony, and issue an order that resolves the requested modification, reformation, or interpretation while balancing the rights of beneficiaries and the duties of trustees under California law.
Understanding common legal terms helps participants navigate the petition process and communicate effectively with counsel and the court. Terms such as reformation, interpretation, trustee, beneficiary, settlor, pour-over will, and Heggstad filing each have specific meanings that affect pleadings and outcomes. Familiarity with these concepts reduces surprises, clarifies expectations, and supports informed decisions about whether to pursue a petition, engage in settlement discussions, or pursue alternative methods for resolving trust disputes.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered correction of a trust document when there is clear and convincing evidence that the written terms do not reflect the trustmaker’s actual intent due to a mistake in expression or drafting. A successful reformation shows that both the original intent and the drafting error exist, and the court adjusts the document to align with what the trustmaker intended. Reformation is focused on rectifying errors in the instrument itself rather than altering the substantive objectives of the trust, and it requires careful factual presentation to satisfy legal standards for relief.
Trust interpretation involves asking the court to clarify ambiguous language within a trust so trustees and beneficiaries understand their rights and duties. When a provision can reasonably be read in more than one way, testimony, the trust document’s context, and relevant extrinsic evidence may be considered to determine the best construction of the provision. Interpretation does not rewrite the trust but provides a legal determination of meaning, allowing trustees to act confidently and beneficiaries to receive distributions consistent with the court’s interpretation.
Modification of a trust encompasses court-approved changes to terms when circumstances make the original provisions impracticable, impossible to administer, or inconsistent with the trust’s purpose. Unlike reformation, modification may address changing conditions that no longer align with the trustmaker’s objectives. Courts will consider whether the proposed changes further the trust’s purpose and protect beneficiaries’ interests. Petitioners must articulate why modification is necessary and how the requested adjustments maintain the trust’s intent while resolving administrative or practical problems.
A Heggstad petition is a specific filing used to establish that certain assets transferred outside the trust are trust property because of a trustee’s actions, documents, or the trustmaker’s intent, even if the title was not retitled into the trust. It provides a judicial determination that the assets belong to the trust, avoiding disputes over ownership and ensuring proper administration. This remedy is often used when an asset intended for the trust was inadvertently left in an individual name or when a transfer was not completed prior to the trustmaker’s death or incapacity.
When a trust needs change, parties should consider available options including informal amendments, nonjudicial settlement agreements, formal court petitions for reformation or modification, and trust interpretation actions. Informal amendments are possible when the trustmaker is available and the document allows for amendment without court involvement. Nonjudicial settlements may resolve disputes with beneficiary agreement. Court petitions are appropriate when parties disagree, when the trustmaker is unavailable, or when legal issues require judicial oversight. Choosing the right path depends on the facts, the trust document’s terms, and the level of consensus among interested parties.
A limited, nonjudicial approach can be effective when all interested parties, including beneficiaries and trustees, agree on the desired change and the trust document allows for amendment or settlement without court involvement. In such cases, a written settlement or amendment can resolve ambiguities and update terms while avoiding litigation costs and delay. Parties should document their agreement carefully, ensure compliance with statutory requirements, and record any necessary documents to avoid future disputes. Clear communication and well-drafted paperwork can preserve relationships and maintain trust administration continuity.
Certain minor administrative adjustments, such as clarifying distribution timelines, replacing a trustee who has resigned, or correcting typographical errors, may be resolved without a court petition if the trust includes procedures for trustee succession or amendment. These adjustments can often be completed by following the trust’s provisions or by executing a valid amendment with the trustmaker’s consent. When the change is straightforward and uncontested, avoiding court intervention saves time and expense, but parties should still confirm that the resulting documentation is legally effective and properly recorded where required.
Comprehensive legal service, including filing a trust modification petition, is often needed when parties dispute the meaning of trust provisions, when there is evidence of drafting mistake, or when a trustmaker’s intentions are contested. Judicial intervention provides an authoritative decision that binds all parties and enables trustees to administer the trust with legal certainty. The court process can also address allegations of misconduct, clarify beneficiary rights, and provide orders that prevent ongoing conflicts from undermining estate administration and family relationships.
When a trust governs diverse assets, includes out-of-state property, or involves complicated tax or creditor considerations, a comprehensive legal approach helps ensure that modifications account for all legal and financial implications. Court-supervised petitions can coordinate decisions affecting multiple beneficiaries and assets, address competing claims, and secure rulings that prevent future litigation. This approach provides a structured process to evaluate complex facts and produce a durable resolution that supports orderly trust administration across changing circumstances.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification combines careful factual investigation, precise pleadings, and court proceedings when needed to achieve a final and enforceable result. This method reduces the risk of future disputes by producing a judicial order that clarifies intent and enforces agreed-upon changes. It also protects trustees who must rely on a court’s direction when administering assets, ensuring that distributions and management activities are consistent with a legally binding resolution and reducing personal liability risks for fiduciaries.
Comprehensive handling of trust matters also involves reviewing the trust alongside related estate documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and retirement plan designations to ensure coherence across the plan. Addressing interconnected documents prevents contradictions and helps implement modifications in a way that supports long-term goals. Courts can issue remedies that resolve title or ownership issues, confirm asset inclusion in the trust, and provide finality that supports enduring family and financial arrangements.
One primary benefit of a comprehensive approach is achieving finality through a court order that clarifies rights, corrects errors, or approves modifications. This legal certainty allows trustees to manage and distribute assets according to a clear directive, reducing the risk of downstream litigation. A court’s decision provides enforceable guidance for fiduciaries and beneficiaries, helping preserve estate assets, minimize administrative confusion, and promote consistent application of the trustmaker’s wishes across time.
Comprehensive proceedings help protect trustees by providing judicial authorization for actions that might otherwise invite challenge, and they help beneficiaries by clarifying entitlements and timeline expectations. When the court reviews the facts and issues an order, trustees gain assurance that their administration aligns with legal requirements, while beneficiaries receive a transparent, enforceable resolution. This protection reduces uncertainty, encourages compliance with the trust’s terms as interpreted or reformed, and supports stable management of trust assets over time.
Collect trust documents, amendments, related estate planning instruments, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that reflects the trustmaker’s intent or actions. Documentation such as signed drafts, email exchanges, and contemporaneous notes can be valuable when establishing the background for a petition. Well-organized evidence makes it easier to identify drafting errors, prove intent, or demonstrate administrative issues affecting the trust. Early collection also facilitates settlement discussions and reduces the time needed to prepare judicial filings.
Before seeking modification, evaluate how changes will affect tax consequences, creditor rights, and long-term administration. A court-ordered change should preserve the trustmaker’s purpose while addressing present needs. Anticipate how adjustments may impact successor trustees, distribution timing, and beneficiary support arrangements. Thoughtful planning ensures that modifications address current problems without creating new challenges for future administration, and it supports a durable trust structure that aligns with the trustmaker’s and the family’s long-term goals.
You may consider a trust modification petition if the trust contains ambiguous language, if drafting mistakes undermine the trustmaker’s stated intent, or if changed family circumstances make original terms impractical. Petitions can reallocate duties, clarify distribution standards, remove or replace trustees, or approve modifications for administration purposes. A petition provides an authoritative resolution that prevents ongoing uncertainty and protects the value of the estate by ensuring that trust assets are managed and distributed in a manner consistent with the court’s order.
Other common reasons include confirming that certain assets belong to the trust, addressing a trustee’s improper actions, responding to creditor claims affecting trust property, or updating beneficiary designations that no longer reflect the trustmaker’s intentions. When informal solutions are unavailable or contested, a petition allows the court to consider relevant evidence, balance competing interests, and issue an order that resolves disputes and guides future administration. This process can preserve family relationships by providing a neutral resolution to contentious issues.
Situations that commonly prompt a trust modification petition include drafting errors discovered after the trustmaker’s incapacity or death, ambiguous provisions that create disagreement among beneficiaries, unintended omissions of assets, and changes in the trustmaker’s family or financial situation. Additional triggers include trustee misconduct, practical impossibility of administering certain provisions, and conflicts over distribution interpretation. Each circumstance benefits from careful factual evaluation to determine whether a petition, negotiation, or another remedy best serves the trust’s purpose and the parties’ interests.
Drafting mistakes or omissions in a trust document can produce outcomes that differ from the trustmaker’s intent, such as distribution errors, incorrect beneficiary descriptions, or failed transfers of specific property. When a mistake is discovered, a petition for reformation or modification can correct the record and align the document with what the trustmaker intended. This process typically requires evidence showing the intended disposition and how the written instrument fails to reflect that intent, which the court may then remedy through a formal order.
Significant life events such as remarriage, births, deaths, divorce, or substantial changes in financial status can render original trust provisions outdated or impractical. A petition may be appropriate to adjust trustee powers, revise distribution schedules, or otherwise modify terms to reflect current realities while honoring the trustmaker’s broader objectives. Courts evaluate whether proposed changes maintain the trust’s purpose and protect beneficiaries’ interests, ensuring modifications support the estate plan’s intent in a changed environment.
Disputes often arise when beneficiaries disagree about the trustmaker’s intent or when assets intended for the trust were not properly retitled. A Heggstad petition may establish that certain items belong to the trust, while interpretation or reformation petitions resolve contested meanings. Court intervention provides a neutral forum to weigh evidence, hear testimony, and reach a decision that binds all parties. Such resolutions prevent prolonged disputes and allow trustees to administer assets according to a clear judicial ruling.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers representation and guidance for trust modification petitions, trust interpretation, reformation actions, and related estate planning needs for Parkwood residents. We help clients evaluate whether a petition is the best path, prepare convincing court filings, coordinate required notices to interested parties, and advocate in hearings when necessary. By combining careful document review with a practical approach to resolution, we aim to achieve outcomes that preserve the trustmaker’s intentions and protect family assets while reducing procedural burdens for clients.
Choosing appropriate legal representation matters when a trust requires judicial review. Our firm provides focused attention on trust matters, ensuring that filings are thorough and supported by relevant evidence. We emphasize clear client communication, help identify the strongest legal grounds for a petition, and work to minimize conflict while protecting clients’ legal rights. Our goal is to achieve practical, enforceable solutions that honor the trustmaker’s intent and reduce the potential for future litigation among beneficiaries.
When preparing a petition, we carefully gather and organize all relevant documents, draft pleadings that persuasively present the factual and legal basis for relief, and coordinate service and procedural steps to keep the matter moving. We prepare clients for hearings and, where appropriate, attempt settlement through negotiation to avoid extended litigation. Our approach balances efficiency with thoroughness, aiming to resolve trust disputes while preserving family relationships whenever possible.
We also integrate trust modification work with related estate planning needs, reviewing documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and trust certifications. This holistic review helps ensure that any court-approved modification fits within the broader estate plan and that successor trustees and beneficiaries receive clear instructions for administration, distribution, and ongoing trust management.
Our process begins with a comprehensive intake to review the trust document, related estate planning instruments, asset titles, and the factual circumstances prompting the petition. We assess legal options, prepare pleadings and supporting declarations, and identify all interested parties who must be notified. If appropriate, we pursue settlement discussions to resolve issues without court intervention. When litigation is necessary, we represent clients at hearings, present evidence, and seek clear judicial orders that address reformation, modification, interpretation, or asset inclusion issues for effective trust administration.
The first step involves reviewing the trust instrument, amendments, related estate planning documents, deeds, account statements, and any evidence indicating the trustmaker’s intent or drafting errors. We interview relevant witnesses, gather correspondence or drafts that shed light on the trust’s history, and identify legal issues that the petition should address. This thorough review establishes a factual foundation for the petition and helps determine whether reformation, modification, interpretation, or a Heggstad filing is the appropriate remedy.
Collecting documentary evidence includes locating all versions of the trust, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and financial records that demonstrate how assets were intended to be held. Evidence such as drafts, witness recollections, and contemporaneous communications often plays an important role in establishing the trustmaker’s intent or revealing drafting mistakes. Organizing these materials early improves the quality of pleadings and helps streamline the process when preparing a petition for court review.
A critical part of the initial stage is identifying all beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties who must receive notice of the petition. Proper notice is essential for the court to consider the matter and for parties to have an opportunity to respond or object. Addressing notice and service requirements at the outset prevents procedural challenges, ensures compliance with California rules, and allows the court to render a binding decision that includes all affected persons.
After preparing the petition and supporting declarations, we file the documents with the appropriate probate court and serve copies on all interested parties. The filing sets in motion a process that may include response periods, preliminary hearings, and opportunities for settlement discussions. We monitor deadlines, manage required disclosures, and handle procedural matters to ensure the petition proceeds efficiently and in compliance with statutory and local rules, while advocating for outcomes aligned with the trustmaker’s intended plan.
Preparing effective court pleadings involves clearly stating the requested relief, presenting factual support through declarations and documentary evidence, and citing relevant legal authorities. We assemble exhibits, prepare witness statements as needed, and structure the filing to address foreseeable objections. Careful pleadings help the court understand the basis for modification or reformation and increase the likelihood of a favorable and enforceable ruling that protects the trust’s purpose and beneficiaries’ interests.
Following service, interested parties may file responses or objections. We analyze those responses, continue factual investigation, and engage in negotiations to resolve contested issues when possible. Settlement discussions can lead to stipulated orders or nonjudicial agreements that avoid prolonged litigation and provide quicker resolutions. When settlement is not possible, we prepare for hearing and trial to present evidence that supports the petitioned modifications or interpretations.
The court may schedule a hearing to evaluate the petition, consider testimony, and hear legal arguments. After review, the court issues an order granting or denying the requested relief, possibly with specific terms for modification, reformation, or interpretation. Once an order is obtained, we assist clients in implementing the court’s directives, updating trust records, retitling assets if necessary, and coordinating with trustees and financial institutions to ensure the order’s practical effect and continued compliance with the trust’s objectives.
At hearing, evidence such as witness declarations, documentary records, and expert testimony relevant to trust intent may be presented to the court in support of the petition. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and present clear legal arguments that align factual proof with statutory standards. Effective presentation at hearing promotes judicial confidence in the requested relief, increasing the likelihood of a definitive order that clarifies or reforms trust provisions as intended by the trustmaker.
After the court issues an order, the next step is practical implementation. This may include updating trust documents, retitling assets into the trust’s name, notifying financial institutions and successor trustees, and preparing minute orders or certified copies for recordation if required. Proper implementation ensures the court’s decision has real-world effect on administration and distribution, and it helps prevent future disputes by documenting compliance with the judicial resolution.
A trust modification petition is a formal request submitted to the probate court asking for a change, correction, or clarification of trust terms when informal amendment is not feasible. Common uses include correcting drafting errors, resolving ambiguities that cause disputes, adjusting terms because of changed circumstances, or confirming that certain assets belong to the trust. The petition frames the factual and legal basis for relief and asks the court to issue an order that resolves the issue in a binding way for trustees and beneficiaries. Petitions are appropriate when involved parties cannot agree on a nonjudicial resolution or when statutory requirements prevent informal changes. The process requires assembling documentary evidence, identifying interested parties to be served, and presenting facts to the court showing why modification, reformation, or interpretation is necessary. The court evaluates the evidence and issues an order that clarifies or amends the trust to reflect the trustmaker’s intent or to address practical administrative problems.
Choosing among reformation, modification, or interpretation depends on the underlying problem and the evidence available. Reformation is sought when the written trust fails to reflect the trustmaker’s actual intent because of a drafting mistake, and clear factual support shows the intended terms. Modification addresses changes needed because the trust’s administration is impracticable or inconsistent with its purpose, while interpretation asks the court to clarify ambiguous language without altering the trust’s substantive provisions. A careful review of the trust document and relevant facts helps determine the correct remedy. Collecting drafts, correspondence, witness statements, and other evidence that indicates intent or explains practical problems with administration supports the proper legal approach. Legal counsel can assess which remedy best fits the circumstances and structure pleadings accordingly to increase the likelihood of court approval.
Yes, a trustee can be removed or replaced through a court petition when there is sound legal ground, such as proven misconduct, incapacity, persistent inability to administer the trust, or other valid reasons under California law. A petition must present evidence supporting the request for removal and propose a suitable successor trustee or request the court to appoint one. The court weighs the interests of beneficiaries, the trustee’s conduct, and the trust’s terms before deciding whether removal serves the trust’s purpose. If the parties agree on a successor trustee, a nonjudicial resolution may avoid litigation. When agreement is not possible, petitioning the court provides a formal mechanism to address trustee performance and secure an enforceable order that guides future administration and protects beneficiaries’ interests from continued mismanagement or conflict.
Evidence to support a trust reformation claim often includes contemporaneous drafts, communications between the trustmaker and drafters, witnesses who recall the trustmaker’s intent, and any documentation showing that the written terms differ from the intended distribution or management instructions. Financial records, deeds, and related estate planning documents can also demonstrate how assets were meant to be held or distributed. Clear and persuasive evidence is necessary to show that a drafting error exists and what the trustmaker intended instead. Because reformation changes the written instrument, courts scrutinize evidence carefully. Declarations from those involved in the trust’s drafting, copies of earlier drafts, and written instructions can be particularly persuasive. Preparing a coherent factual narrative supported by documents and witness statements strengthens a petition and helps the court conclude that reformation is warranted to reflect the trustmaker’s true intentions.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, whether interested parties contest the matter, and the court’s schedule. Straightforward, uncontested petitions may be resolved in a matter of months if parties agree and no hearing is required, while contested matters can take significantly longer, potentially a year or more if extensive discovery, hearings, and trial preparation are involved. Local court procedures and backlog also influence timing. Early organization of documents, proactive communication with interested parties, and attempts at settlement can shorten the timeline. Promptly identifying and serving all interested parties, preparing strong pleadings, and being prepared for hearings helps move the matter forward efficiently. Counsel can provide a realistic estimate after reviewing the facts and anticipated objections.
A petition focused on a specific trust provision generally does not alter unrelated parts of an estate plan unless the modifications affect interconnected documents or assets. Courts aim to preserve the trustmaker’s overall plan while addressing the targeted issue, but changes may require coordination with pour-over wills, beneficiary designations, retirement accounts, and other instruments to ensure consistency. It is important to review all estate documents to identify potential ripple effects before seeking judicial relief. When modifications could impact other instruments, counsel will recommend steps to harmonize documents and update records after the court issues an order. This may include retitling assets, updating account beneficiaries, or amending related documents so the entire estate plan functions cohesively and reflects the trustmaker’s intended outcomes.
Costs associated with filing a trust modification petition include court filing fees, service costs for notifying interested parties, and legal fees for preparation, negotiation, and representation at hearings. The total cost depends on the petition’s complexity, the level of opposition, and the extent of factual investigation required. Uncontested matters typically involve lower costs, while contested proceedings with discovery and trial preparation increase expenses accordingly. Clients should weigh potential costs against the benefit of obtaining a clear judicial resolution that prevents future disputes or administrative problems. Early efforts at mediation or settlement can reduce fees, and a careful cost-benefit analysis helps determine whether a petition is the most effective way to secure a durable outcome for the trust and its beneficiaries.
Yes, many trust disputes can be resolved without court involvement through nonjudicial settlement agreements, mediation, or mutual amendment when the trustmaker is available and the trust permits such actions. Open communication and negotiation among beneficiaries and trustees often lead to practical solutions that avoid the expense and delay of litigation. Mediation provides a neutral forum for resolving conflicts while preserving relationships and enabling customized resolutions tailored to the family’s needs. However, when parties cannot agree, when statutory restrictions prevent nonjudicial modification, or when impartial adjudication is required to protect certain parties, a court petition becomes necessary. Assessing the willingness of parties to negotiate and the legal constraints on nonjudicial changes helps determine the best path forward for achieving a stable resolution.
If assets intended for the trust were not retitled, a Heggstad petition or related court filing can be used to establish that those assets were meant to be trust property. Evidence demonstrating intent to include the asset in the trust—such as transfer instructions, account paperwork, or witness statements—supports a judicial determination that the asset belongs to the trust despite title remaining in the trustmaker’s name. This remedy helps prevent unintended probate and ensures proper administration under the trust’s terms. Prior to filing, it is helpful to gather all documents showing the trustmaker’s intent, any transfer attempts, and communications with financial institutions. If possible, correcting title informally before incapacity or death is ideal, but when that is not an option, a court filing provides a path to confirm trust ownership and integrate the assets into trust administration.
To start the process of filing a trust modification petition, gather the original trust document and any amendments, related estate planning instruments, account statements, deeds, and any communications or drafts that shed light on the trustmaker’s intent. Contact counsel to review the materials and discuss the facts that make modification, reformation, interpretation, or a Heggstad filing appropriate. Counsel will evaluate the evidence, identify interested parties, and recommend the most effective legal approach. After deciding to proceed, counsel prepares the petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits, files the documents with the probate court, and serves interested parties. Counsel then manages responses, attempts settlement where feasible, and represents the petitioner at hearings to secure an order that resolves the trust matter and guides future administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas