A Heggstad petition can be an effective legal step when a decedent’s trust was not fully funded before their death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients in Inverness and throughout Marin County in understanding how a Heggstad petition can move assets into an estate planning trust without full probate administration. This process is focused on clarifying title, transferring ownership of specific assets to the trust, and closing gaps left by omitted funding steps. We explain options clearly so clients can make informed decisions about estate administration and asset protection consistent with California law.
Many families discover after a loved one’s death that certain assets remain titled in the decedent’s name rather than the trust. A Heggstad petition provides a pathway to reconcile that issue by asking the court to recognize the trust’s ownership rights and allow transfer to the trust. This remedy can reduce delay, limit expense, and help preserve what the decedent intended when they created a revocable living trust. Our approach emphasizes careful documentation, clear pleading, and respectful communication with beneficiaries and fiduciaries to resolve matters efficiently and with minimal conflict.
A Heggstad petition matters because it helps align the practical ownership of assets with the decedent’s estate plan, often avoiding a full probate. This approach benefits trustees and beneficiaries by clarifying property title, reducing administrative burdens, and helping preserve estate value for heirs. Timing and documentation are important; showing the court the trust’s intent and supporting evidence of ownership helps the petition succeed. Our firm focuses on assembling the necessary paperwork, preparing persuasive pleadings, and coordinating with fiduciaries and beneficiaries to move assets into the trust while balancing cost, speed, and legal protections under California law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and probate services to residents across Marin County, including Inverness and surrounding communities. Our practice handles trust administration issues such as Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, and related filings. We bring a practical, client-centered approach that focuses on clear explanation, thorough documentation, and consistent communication with clients and family members. Whether clients need help initiating a petition, responding to objections, or completing post-judgment transfers, our goal is to secure outcomes that honor the decedent’s intentions and minimize disruption for beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is used when a decedent drafted a trust but some assets were never properly retitled into that trust before the decedent’s death. The petition asks the court to recognize that the decedent intended the trust to own the asset and to direct the transfer of title to the trustee. This can be critical in situations where a burial property, bank account, vehicle, or other asset remains in the decedent’s name, and the trustee needs legal authority to manage or distribute it under the trust terms. The process requires evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent and the trust’s validity.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on documentary evidence, witness statements, and factual clarity about the decedent’s actions and intentions. Common supporting materials include the trust document, beneficiary designations, declarations or affidavits from persons familiar with the decedent’s estate plan, and records showing attempts to retitle property. The petition must be drafted to satisfy California probate court standards and to address potential objections from beneficiaries or creditors. Through careful preparation and procedural compliance, the petition can provide a court order that enables the trustee to transfer the property into the trust without lengthy probate proceedings.
A Heggstad petition is a specific probate filing in California courts asking judicial recognition that certain assets belong to a decedent’s revocable trust even though title was never formally changed. The typical goal is to correct the administrative omission so the trustee can manage or distribute property according to the trust’s terms. Filing such a petition involves presenting clear evidence of the trust, the decedent’s intent to include the asset, and any relevant communications or documentation. The court then evaluates the petition and, if satisfied, issues an order permitting transfer of the asset to the trustee for trust administration purposes.
Preparing a Heggstad petition requires meticulous gathering of documents and a precise narrative that ties the evidence to the trust’s terms. Essential elements include a certified copy of the trust, proof of the decedent’s death, documentation showing the asset was subject to the trust, and affidavits or declarations that corroborate the decedent’s intent. The petition must identify interested parties and provide appropriate notice. Courts may require hearing dates, opportunities for objections, and sometimes supplementary declarations. Careful attention to procedural rules and timelines helps the petition proceed without avoidable setbacks.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the petition process with confidence. Terms such as trust decedent, trustee, beneficiary, title transfer, probate court order, and supporting declaration commonly appear in filings. Each term carries specific implications for how property is identified, who must be served with notice, and what evidence the court expects. Learning these terms early in the process helps reduce confusion, sets clearer expectations for timing, and allows family members to participate in a constructive way while legal documents are assembled and submitted.
A trust is a written arrangement in which a grantor transfers legal ownership of assets to a trustee to hold, manage, and distribute those assets for the benefit of named beneficiaries, according to the instructions set out in the trust document. Revocable living trusts are commonly used in estate planning to avoid probate for assets properly titled in the trust’s name during the grantor’s lifetime. When assets remain outside the trust at death, legal actions such as a Heggstad petition may be used to align actual ownership with the trust’s provisions and carry out the grantor’s intentions.
A petition is a formal written request submitted to the probate court asking for a judicial order to address a specific legal matter, such as transferring titled property into a trust. The petition outlines factual and legal bases for the requested relief and lists interested parties who must be notified. In the Heggstad context, the petition seeks recognition that the decedent intended the trust to own certain property. The court reviews evidence presented with the petition and may schedule a hearing to decide whether the requested transfer should be authorized.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed under the trust document to manage trust assets, comply with the trust’s terms, and act in the beneficiaries’ best interests. When a trustor dies, the successor trustee steps into the trustee role and assumes responsibility for trust administration. If property was not retitled to the trust before the trustor’s death, the trustee may file a Heggstad petition to obtain court authority to transfer that property into the trust, enabling consistent administration and distribution according to the trust’s instructions.
A probate court order is a judicial directive issued after reviewing a petition and supporting evidence, granting specific relief such as the transfer of assets into a trust. For Heggstad petitions, the court order confirms that the evidence shows the decedent intended the trust to own the property, and it authorizes the transfer or re-titling needed to align legal ownership with the trust. Such an order can provide the trustee with the legal authority necessary to manage, sell, or distribute the property as the trust dictates.
When assets are left outside a trust, families can pursue different paths depending on asset type, value, and the decedent’s intentions. Options include a Heggstad petition to transfer the asset into the trust, a small estate affidavit when applicable, or full probate administration when higher-value assets or complications exist. Each path involves different timelines, costs, and court involvement. A careful comparison considers the asset’s title issues, potential creditor claims, the presence of multiple interested parties, and whether the trust document and supporting evidence clearly demonstrate the decedent’s intended ownership.
Small estate procedures can be sufficient when the decedent’s assets fall under statutory thresholds and creditors are not presenting claims. These streamlined filings may avoid full probate and can serve to transfer certain assets more quickly and with lower expense. Eligibility depends on asset type and total value, and the process still requires careful documentation of ownership and beneficiaries. In many cases where a trust exists, comparing small estate options against a Heggstad petition helps determine the most cost-effective and legally sound route for transferring property to heirs or a trustee.
A limited approach can work when title documentation is straightforward and uncontested, allowing informal transfer without a full court proceeding. Examples include joint accounts with right of survivorship or assets with beneficiary designations that operate outside probate. When documentation clearly indicates the decedent’s intended disposition, the trustee or beneficiaries may be able to avoid a petition. However, when the asset was intended to be in a trust but remains solely in the decedent’s name, more formal filings like a Heggstad petition are often needed to resolve title questions reliably and to produce a court order accepted by third parties.
Comprehensive legal services become important when estates involve diverse assets such as real property, retirement accounts, business interests, or out-of-state holdings. Each asset type may require a different legal approach to preserve value and comply with tax and probate rules. A coordinated strategy ensures that Heggstad petitions, beneficiary claims, and other filings proceed in a sequence that reduces legal conflict and unnecessary expense. For families with intertwined assets or contested distributions, a full assessment helps prioritize filings, gather needed evidence, and secure the court orders or transfers necessary to honor the trust’s terms.
When beneficiaries may contest ownership or distribution of assets, a comprehensive legal plan helps anticipate objections and present stronger evidence in support of a petition. That includes preparing clear declarations, documenting communications, and ensuring all legal notice requirements are met to reduce grounds for dispute. Coordinated representation also helps protect fiduciary duties and manage negotiations that may resolve differences without court hearings. When disputes are likely, handling matters proactively often reduces delay and preserves estate value compared to reacting to litigation after issues arise.
A comprehensive approach to trust funding gaps helps ensure that administrative steps are completed in the most efficient order, minimizing the risk of avoidable court delays or additional expense. This approach includes verifying asset titles, collecting necessary evidence, preparing petitions and notices, and managing communication with beneficiaries and institutions. When these tasks are handled together, trustees benefit from smoother transitions, clearer authority to act, and fewer surprises that can slow administration. The result is a more predictable timeline and better protection of estate value for intended beneficiaries.
Comprehensive handling also supports continuity of care for those named in health directives, guardianship nominations, and other related documents that often accompany a trust. Coordinated legal work reduces the administrative burden on family members during a stressful time and helps ensure that healthcare directives, powers of attorney, and trust provisions operate in harmony. By addressing funding gaps as part of a broader estate administration plan, trustees can focus on honoring the decedent’s wishes while avoiding piecemeal decisions that can lead to oversight or dispute.
When trust funding and related matters are approached comprehensively, petitions and transfers can be coordinated to reduce hearing requirements and duplicative filings, which often lowers overall expense. Clear documentation prepared at the outset helps prevent follow-up requests and evidentiary gaps that lengthen the process. Trustees and beneficiaries typically experience a more predictable timeline and fewer administrative headaches when legal tasks are consolidated and handled with attention to procedural details and practical needs of institutions such as banks and title companies.
A thorough approach helps assure the court and third parties that the trustee is acting with proper legal authority, backed by well-documented evidence and appropriate notice to interested parties. That clarity reduces the risk of rejection by title companies or financial institutions and provides a firmer basis for transferring assets into the trust. When issues are addressed together, trustees can carry out distribution and management tasks confidently, secure in the knowledge that procedural steps have been taken to establish legal title and minimize exposure to later claims.
Start by collecting all relevant trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that reflects the decedent’s intent. These documents form the backbone of a Heggstad petition and make the court’s review more straightforward. Early organization reduces delays when filings are prepared and helps identify assets that may require separate handling. Also compile information on heirs and potential interested parties to ensure proper notice and to avoid procedural defects that could extend the timeline for transferring assets into the trust.
Communicating early with title companies, banks, and other custodians helps identify their requirements for completing transfers once a court order is obtained. Different institutions may have particular documentation preferences, and aligning the petition’s relief with those requirements can streamline post-judgment transfers. Preparing the necessary certified documents, court orders, and transfer forms in advance reduces administrative friction and enables the trustee to complete retitling or distribution promptly after the court grants relief.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain in the decedent’s name and cannot be transferred through informal channels. This filing helps clarify ownership, which is important for avoiding probate or for completing trust administration in accordance with the decedent’s wishes. If timely action is not taken, institutions may resist transfers, or the estate may face unnecessary delays. A Heggstad petition offers a targeted remedy to align legal title with the trust and allow trustees to manage and distribute property under the trust’s provisions.
You may also consider a Heggstad petition when third parties require a court order before accepting a change in title or when multiple interested parties must receive proper notice to protect their rights. The petition process gives the trustee formal authority to act and can reduce later disputes about ownership. Families benefit from clear procedures and court validation when executing the trust’s terms, particularly for real property and significant financial accounts where a firm legal record of transfer is necessary.
Typical scenarios include a decedent who executed a revocable living trust but failed to retitle a house, vehicle, or bank account; a trust that references specific property not formally transferred; or an estate with mixed ownership records across institutions. Other situations arise when a trustee needs authority to sell property or when beneficiary designations conflict with the trust document. Identifying these circumstances early helps determine whether a Heggstad petition, alternative small estate procedure, or probate filing is the most appropriate path.
Real property is often the largest asset in an estate and is frequently a subject of Heggstad petitions when it remains in the decedent’s name. Courts will examine the trust, related deeds, and supporting declarations to determine whether the decedent intended the trust to own the property. A successfully supported petition can produce a court order that authorizes the trustee to transfer the deed into the trust, sell the property, or distribute proceeds according to the trust. Properly preparing the petition reduces delays and helps custodians accept the court’s order for title transfer.
Bank and investment accounts sometimes remain titled in the decedent’s name, especially if the trust creation occurred shortly before death. Financial institutions may refuse to accept trustee authority without a court order, and a Heggstad petition can provide the necessary judicial confirmation. Filing a petition typically includes account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and evidence showing the decedent intended those accounts to be governed by the trust. Once the court grants relief, institutions usually comply and allow the trustee to access or transfer the funds into the trust.
Assets with conflicting or incomplete documentation present a common challenge that a Heggstad petition can remedy. Examples include properties listed inconsistently in estate records, accounts with outdated beneficiary designations, or items described in a will but not retitled. The petition process allows the court to weigh the available evidence and render a decision recognizing the trust’s ownership when appropriate. Clear legal argumentation paired with corroborating declarations improves the chances of a successful transfer and reduces the potential for protracted disputes among interested parties.
Residents of Inverness and nearby Marin County communities can rely on local legal support to address trust funding challenges and Heggstad petitions. We assist trustees, family members, and fiduciaries by reviewing trust documents, identifying assets that need retitling, and preparing the paperwork for court filings. Our approach emphasizes transparent communication about timelines, costs, and anticipated outcomes. We aim to help clients move forward with confidence and clarity while ensuring that transfers and administrative actions align with California law and the decedent’s documented intentions.
Clients choose our firm for reasoned legal guidance, practical solutions, and careful attention to procedural detail. We prioritize helping trustees and families understand the options and likely outcomes so they can make sound choices during administration. Our work includes preparing the necessary petitions and declarations, coordinating notices to interested parties, and interfacing with courts and institutions to complete transfers. We focus on reducing friction during an often difficult time and steer the process to a timely resolution that honors the decedent’s wishes.
We also place importance on clear communication about fees, expected timing, and the documents needed from clients to support a petition. By setting realistic expectations and mapping out each step, we help trustees and beneficiaries prepare for hearings and post-order transfers. This process-oriented approach aims to minimize surprises and give families a straightforward path to completing trust administration in a manner consistent with both legal requirements and the decedent’s stated plans.
Additionally, we assist with related estate planning matters that often arise alongside Heggstad petitions, such as preparing pour-over wills, updating beneficiary designations, and documenting guardianship nominations. This broader perspective helps ensure that once assets are properly titled, the overall estate plan functions smoothly and family members benefit from a coordinated administration that reflects the decedent’s overall intentions and provides practical closure for heirs.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust, the asset title, and any supporting documentation to evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then compile declarations, prepare the petition, and serve notice on interested parties. If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present the evidence to the court and work to secure an order authorizing transfer into the trust. After obtaining the order, we assist with re-titling and coordinating with financial and title institutions to complete the transfer and close the administrative loop for trustees and beneficiaries.
Initial review focuses on collecting the trust instrument, death certificate, asset records, and any documents showing the decedent’s intent regarding particular property. We identify interested parties, note possible creditor issues, and determine the evidentiary steps needed to support a petition. Gathering clear and complete documentation at the outset reduces the need for supplemental filings and streamlines the court’s evaluation. This stage also includes an explanation of expected timelines, fees, and next steps so the trustee understands how the case will proceed.
Gathering trust and asset records requires careful attention to detail, including certified copies of the trust, deeds, account statements, titles, and beneficiary forms. We also seek any correspondence or signed declarations that reflect the decedent’s actions to fund the trust. Documents that show attempts to retitle property, communications with financial institutions, and witness statements can be particularly helpful. Collecting these items early allows the petition to present a cohesive factual narrative that courts find persuasive and facilitates smoother interactions with third-party institutions following any court order.
Identifying and properly notifying all interested parties is a vital procedural step. Parties such as beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, and potential creditors need to receive notice so the court can provide them an opportunity to be heard. Failing to provide correct notice can jeopardize the petition and result in delays. We prepare and manage service documents, ensuring compliance with probate code requirements and documenting efforts to reach and inform those with a legal interest in the property at issue.
Once documentation and notices are in order, we draft the Heggstad petition with clear statements of fact and supporting declarations. The petition sets out the legal grounds for the requested order and includes exhibits that substantiate the decedent’s intent. We file the petition with the appropriate probate court, arrange for service on interested parties, and submit any required filing fees and proposed orders. Accurate and persuasive petition drafting reduces the likelihood of continuances or evidentiary issues at hearing.
Drafting involves describing the asset, explaining why it was not retitled, and presenting factual support such as trust excerpts and witness declarations. The supporting declarations must be factual, specific, and sworn under penalty of perjury to strengthen the court record. Exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and communications with institutions are attached to provide context. A well-organized petition anticipates common questions and lays out a clear legal path for the court to grant the requested transfer.
After filing, we serve the petition and await any responses or objections from interested parties. If objections arise, we assess their basis and prepare replies or seek negotiated resolutions where appropriate. The court may schedule a hearing to review the matter, at which point we present the evidence and legal argumentation supporting the petition. Being prepared for objections reduces the risk of extended litigation and helps move the petition toward a conclusion that permits the trustee to proceed with transfer.
If the court grants the petition, it issues an order authorizing the transfer of the specified asset into the trust. We then assist with preparing the necessary documents to record deeds, update titles, or instruct financial institutions to retitle accounts. Properly executed post-order transfers help ensure third parties accept the court’s determination and enable the trustee to administer or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust. We remain available to handle any follow-up questions or remaining administrative tasks until transfers are completed.
Recording deeds and updating titles often require certified court orders and properly formatted transfer documents acceptable to county recorders and title companies. We prepare the required paperwork, confirm any tax or recording implications, and coordinate with local recorders to ensure the deed is recorded in the trust’s name. Accurate recording protects the trustee’s authority and provides a public record aligning title with the trust. This step finalizes the legal recognition of the trust’s ownership of the property.
After transfers are complete, it is important to update trust inventories, inform beneficiaries of the completed actions, and close remaining administrative tasks such as final account reconciliations. We help trustees prepare final inventories and distribution plans that reflect the newly transferred assets. Clear communication with beneficiaries about the process and outcomes reduces uncertainty and supports a smoother transition as the trust moves forward with distribution or ongoing management in accordance with the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition is a probate filing that asks the court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as trust property even though they were not formally retitled before the trustmaker’s death. The petition is used when a revocable living trust exists but a particular asset remains in the decedent’s name, preventing the trustee from managing or distributing it under the trust terms. By presenting the trust, supporting declarations, and related evidence, the petition seeks a court order that authorizes the trustee to transfer title into the trust so administration can continue as intended. A Heggstad petition should be considered when informal transfer methods are unavailable or when a third party, such as a bank or title company, requires judicial confirmation before accepting a change in ownership. It is also appropriate when the asset’s value or the interests of multiple beneficiaries make clear legal authority necessary. Filing the petition provides a formal path to align title with the trust and helps prevent later disputes about ownership or distribution of the property.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on court schedules, the need to serve interested parties, and whether objections arise. In straightforward cases with clear documentation and no objections, the process can move relatively quickly, sometimes concluding within a few months. When the court requires additional evidence, continuances are requested, or parties contest the petition, the process can extend for a longer period. Local probate court calendars and filing backlogs also influence timing. To reduce delays, gather strong supporting documents and provide proper notice to all interested parties early in the process. Clear, detailed declarations and thorough exhibits help the court evaluate the petition without needing extensive supplementation. Working proactively to resolve potential objections can also shorten the timeline and lead to a more efficient resolution for trustees and beneficiaries.
Essential evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes a copy of the trust, the decedent’s death certificate, documentation showing the asset in the decedent’s name, and any correspondence or records indicating the decedent intended the trust to own the asset. Declarations from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent or actions to fund the trust are especially valuable. Other supporting materials might include deeds, account statements, or emails that corroborate the trust’s relationship to the asset. Courts look for clear, specific fact statements rather than general assertions. Detailed supporting declarations that explain why the asset should be considered trust property and include relevant dates, actions taken, and who has knowledge of the decedent’s intent make the petition more persuasive. Preparing a well-organized exhibit list and presenting the evidence coherently helps the court make a timely decision.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition depend on the asset and the estate’s circumstances. For lower-value assets, small estate procedures or affidavits may permit transfer without a petition. Joint ownership or designated beneficiaries on accounts can also allow assets to pass outside of probate or a formal court order. Sometimes informal agreements among beneficiaries and institutions can resolve title issues when documentation is clear and parties are cooperative. However, when an asset is significant, when institutions require judicial confirmation, or when multiple interested parties are involved, a Heggstad petition often remains the most reliable method to secure transfer into the trust. Evaluating all options with careful documentation helps determine which approach best balances cost, speed, and legal certainty.
A Heggstad petition addresses ownership and title issues rather than directly resolving creditor claims. While a court order transferring property into a trust clarifies who may manage or distribute assets, creditors of the decedent may still have rights against the estate until barred by applicable deadlines or settlement. The petition does not create a new shield against legitimate creditor claims, and trustees must remain mindful of potential liabilities when distributing assets. Trustees should coordinate with counsel to confirm creditor notice requirements and to ensure distributions comply with applicable probate timelines and statutes. In some cases, resolving creditor matters or obtaining a court determination about claims may be necessary before final distributions can be made, and legal guidance helps manage those parallel obligations responsibly.
Yes, family members and other interested parties can object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property or if they contest elements of the evidence. Objections can raise factual disputes, questions about the trust’s validity, or concerns about notice. The court will consider any objections and may schedule a hearing to resolve contested issues, allowing parties to present evidence and argument. When objections arise, the matter can be more complex and may require additional declarations, testimony, or negotiated settlements. Working to address objections through documentation, clarification, or mediation can reduce the need for prolonged litigation. Effective case preparation anticipates common areas of dispute and seeks to resolve them with a combination of clear evidence and procedural care.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the trustee may need to consider alternative paths such as full probate administration, additional evidentiary submissions, or settlement with objecting parties. A denial may stem from insufficient documentation, competing claims, or unresolved creditor issues. When denied, counsel and the trustee assess the underlying reasons and determine whether new evidence, a revised petition, or a different administrative route would be more appropriate to achieve the intended outcome. In some cases, additional investigation or negotiation can produce the supporting materials needed to refile or pursue another remedy. When a petition is denied due to procedural defects, correcting those issues and refiling may be possible. A careful review of the court’s reasons helps guide the next steps and minimize further delay or expense.
After a petition is granted, the court issues an order that authorizes transfer of designated property into the trust. For real property, this typically involves preparing a certified copy of the court order and recording a new deed in the county recorder’s office showing the trustee as owner. For financial accounts, institutions usually require a certified court order and may have specific forms to process the retitling or distribution according to the trust terms. Coordinating these post-order steps requires careful attention to document formatting, county recording requirements, and institution-specific processes. Assistance in preparing certified copies, coordinating with title companies, and ensuring proper recording helps guarantee that the transfer is recognized by third parties and that the trustee can manage or distribute the asset under the trust.
Many financial institutions will accept a certified court order, but practices vary by institution and account type. Some custodians have specific internal procedures and may request additional documentation before retitling an account. Providing a clear court order, certified copies of the trust, and any forms the institution requires improves the likelihood of smooth processing. Institutions are generally more cooperative when the court order explicitly authorizes the trustee’s actions and is accompanied by complete supporting documents. If an institution resists, additional steps such as liaising with institution counsel or obtaining clarifying orders from the court may be necessary. Preparing the required paperwork in advance and anticipating institutional questions reduces the chance of prolonged administrative back-and-forth after the petition is granted.
To avoid the need for a Heggstad petition in the future, consider ensuring that assets are properly retitled into any revocable living trust during the trustmaker’s life, and review beneficiary designations periodically for consistency with the trust. Regularly updating deeds, account registrations, and policy ownership to reflect the trust helps prevent post-mortem funding gaps. Maintaining an organized file of estate planning documents and communicating with successor trustees about intended holdings also reduces the risk of omitted assets at death. Additionally, consulting with counsel periodically to audit the estate plan and confirm that title and beneficiary designations align with the trust’s provisions can be a practical preventive measure. Proactive retitling and documentation reduce the likelihood of needing court intervention and help ensure a smoother transition for trustees and beneficiaries when the time comes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas