A Heggstad petition is a court process used in California to recognize that certain assets owned by a deceased person should have been distributed to a living trust but were not properly transferred before death. This situation often arises when property remains titled solely in the decedent’s name or when deeds were not recorded to reflect trust ownership. The petition asks the probate court to declare that the assets belong to the trust so that title can be transferred without full probate administration. For Kentfield and Marin County residents, understanding how a Heggstad petition works can shorten administration time and reduce the disruption families face following a loved one’s death.
Families in Kentfield commonly encounter issues where property was intended to be held in trust but remains titled elsewhere due to oversights or timing. A Heggstad petition provides a remedy that recognises the trust’s ownership based on evidence such as trust documents, pre-death intent, and supporting affidavits. Filing such a petition requires clear documentation and careful preparation to satisfy the court. The process can enable a smoother transfer of real property into the trust and help avoid the full probate process, preserving privacy and potentially reducing costs and delays for beneficiaries and trustees in Marin County.
A successful Heggstad petition can restore the intent behind a decedent’s estate plan by confirming trust ownership for assets that were inadvertently left outside the trust. This remedy is especially important for real property where title paperwork was not completed. Benefits include facilitating transfer of title to trustees, avoiding a protracted probate administration for those assets, and preserving the privacy of the trust process. In Kentfield and surrounding Marin County communities, clients rely on this petition to align legal title with the decedent’s estate plan, reduce court oversight, and minimize disruption for heirs and beneficiaries after a death in the family.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services for individuals and families in San Jose, Marin County, and across California. The firm handles Heggstad petitions with an emphasis on careful document review, practical solutions, and clear communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and court clerks. When a property transfer was missed or deed records conflict with a trust, the firm assists clients in assembling the necessary proof and presenting a coherent petition to the probate court. We prioritize getting matters resolved efficiently so families can move forward with confidence in the administration of their loved one’s estate.
A Heggstad petition is designed to correct title for property that should have passed to a trust during the decedent’s lifetime or at death but did not due to an omission or clerical error. To succeed, petitioners present trust documents, deeds, affidavits, and other evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent and the relationship between the asset and the trust. The court evaluates whether it is appropriate to declare the trust as the rightful owner. In Marin County, Heggstad petitions are commonly used for residential real estate, certain bank accounts, and other titled assets where recorded ownership does not reflect trust arrangements.
The procedure typically begins with a thorough title search and collection of documents showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Petitioners must notify interested parties and may need to address potential objections from heirs or creditors. The relief requested is limited to recognition of trust ownership for the specific assets at issue rather than a full probate administration. While a Heggstad petition can simplify matters for many families in Kentfield and the broader Bay Area, it requires careful legal and factual groundwork so that the court can be persuaded to correct the public record in favor of the trust.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that assets recorded in the decedent’s name are effectively part of the decedent’s trust based on evidence of intent and surrounding circumstances. The petition explains how the omission occurred, presents the trust instrument and related documents, and requests a court order recognizing the trust’s ownership. This remedy addresses situations where formal transfer steps were missed, such as failing to record a deed or neglecting to change title on a bank account. For property owners in Kentfield, this process helps align legal title with the estate plan that was intended to govern distribution and administration.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on a clear assembly of trust documents, deeds, affidavits, and corroborating evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Common elements include a certified copy of the trust, any pre-death transfer documents, a declaration from the trustee or witnesses explaining the omission, and a title report showing current ownership. The process often requires formal notice to heirs and interested parties, and the court may schedule a hearing to review any objections. Careful preparation and factual clarity are essential to persuade the court to enter an order recognizing trust ownership for the affected asset.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petitions helps petitioners and trustees navigate the process with confidence. Key terms include trust, trustee, beneficiary, probate court, deed, title, and petition. Each term carries legal significance for how ownership is determined and how assets are transferred. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to gather the right documents and respond to courtroom procedures. For residents of Kentfield and surrounding areas, knowing these terms supports informed decision making when addressing missed trust transfers and coordinating with the probate court to update title records accurately.
A Heggstad petition is a specific probate court filing in California that requests the court to recognize that certain assets owned by a decedent should be treated as trust assets even though title was not formally transferred. The petition explains the circumstances of the omission and provides evidence to support the claim that the decedent intended those assets to be held in trust. When the court grants the petition, it issues an order that allows trustees to transfer or record title in the trust’s name, helping avoid the need for a full probate administration for those particular assets.
A trust is a legal arrangement where one person or entity, the trustee, holds title to property for the benefit of others, known as beneficiaries, according to the terms set out by the person who created the trust. Trusts are commonly used in estate planning to control how assets are managed and distributed, to avoid probate for trust-owned property, and to provide continuity after the creator’s death. When title documentation does not reflect trust ownership, a Heggstad petition can be used to correct the record and confirm that certain assets are intended to be trust assets.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed to manage trust property in accordance with the trust document. The trustee has a duty to administer assets for the beneficiaries, manage records, and carry out distributions as directed by the trust. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trustee may file or support the petition to have assets declared part of the trust if title was not properly transferred during the trust maker’s lifetime. The trustee’s declarations and actions are often central to demonstrating the trust’s ownership of the affected assets.
A deed is a legal instrument used to transfer ownership of real property, and title refers to the legal ownership interest recorded in public records. If a deed was not recorded in the name of a trust or remains in the decedent’s personal name, the property may not be reflected as trust-owned in the county records. The Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that the trust should be the owner despite the recorded title, enabling the trustee to update the public record to reflect the trust’s ownership without a full probate proceeding for that asset.
When assets are left outside a trust, families have options that include filing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate, or pursuing a trust modification or other corrective instrument if available. A Heggstad petition focuses on correcting title for specific assets and can be a narrower, quicker route than full probate, provided that strong documentary evidence exists. Probate can be more time-consuming and public, while trust modifications address the trust terms but may not fix title transfers for overlooked assets. Choosing the right path for Kentfield residents depends on the nature of the assets, the clarity of the trust documents, and any potential objections from heirs or creditors.
A limited Heggstad petition is often sufficient when the issue involves a single parcel of real estate that was meant to be held in trust but remains titled in the decedent’s personal name. In those circumstances, the factual record may be straightforward: a trust document exists naming the property, and the failure to transfer title appears to be an administrative oversight. Presenting the trust, any pre-death transfer documents, and witness declarations can persuade the court to recognize the trust’s ownership, allowing the trustee to record an appropriate transfer and avoid a full probate of that asset.
When there is clear documentary evidence demonstrating the decedent’s intent for certain assets to be held in trust, a limited Heggstad petition can resolve title issues efficiently. Examples include signed trust documents referencing specific property, beneficiary designations tying the asset to the trust, or contemporaneous correspondence indicating intent. If heirs and interested parties acknowledge the trust’s intended ownership and do not oppose the petition, the court can often grant recognition of the trust for those assets, streamlining the post-death transfer process without engaging in broader estate administration.
A comprehensive approach becomes necessary when multiple assets were omitted from trust funding or when there are disputes among heirs about ownership and distribution. Complex title histories, conflicting deeds, or substantial creditor claims complicate the path forward and may require coordinated actions such as multiple petitions, settlement negotiations, or even limited probate. In those situations, a broader legal strategy helps protect the trust’s interests, address competing claims, and establish a plan for resolving tangled title issues across different asset types and jurisdictions.
When interested parties contest the trust’s claim to assets or raise objections to a Heggstad petition, a more comprehensive legal response is needed to present evidence, respond to motions, and advocate in court. Contested matters require careful factual development, formal discovery if necessary, and persuasive legal argument to address challenges. For clients in Marin County facing disputes, taking a full-service approach helps ensure that all procedural and substantive aspects are handled thoroughly so the court can reach a sound and enforceable decision regarding trust ownership and asset distribution.
A comprehensive strategy for resolving missed trust transfers ensures that every relevant asset and potential claimant is considered, reducing the risk of future litigation or unresolved title problems. By reviewing trust instruments, deeds, beneficiary designations, and tax implications, a thorough approach clarifies the full scope of the estate and provides a coordinated path to correct records and complete distributions. This is particularly valuable when families face complex property portfolios or mixed ownership structures that require more than a single, narrow petition to resolve cleanly and permanently.
Taking a complete view of the estate and title issues helps prevent overlooked items from emerging later and causing delays or additional expense. Coordinating filings, preparing clear documentation, and addressing potential objections up front reduces the chance of reopened disputes. For trustees and families in Kentfield, a comprehensive process promotes certainty in administration, helps maintain continuity in property management, and supports timely transfers that align with the decedent’s original estate plan while safeguarding beneficiaries’ interests.
A broad approach that addresses all potentially affected assets and identifies likely claimants helps reduce the risk of later challenges that might undo or complicate transfers. When the record is carefully assembled and all interested parties are notified appropriately, the settlement or court order is more resistant to attack. For families concerned with long-term stability of property ownership and distribution, this preventive planning minimizes the possibility of litigation and eases the administration burden on trustees and beneficiaries following the decedent’s death.
By handling title corrections, creditor notifications, and potential disputes together, a comprehensive process can streamline administration and preserve the decedent’s intended distribution of property. This coordinated work reduces redundant steps and helps trustees fulfill their responsibilities with a single clear plan. For Marin County families, that means less time spent in court, fewer surprises, and a more predictable path to finalizing the estate in a way that honors the trust maker’s wishes and supports beneficiaries in receiving their designated interests.
Begin by assembling a complete set of documents including the trust instrument, any deed drafts or recorded deeds, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that indicates the decedent’s intent to transfer property to the trust. A clear chain of documentation helps establish the factual foundation the court expects for a Heggstad petition. Also obtain a current title report for the property in question and identify all potential interested parties so they can be properly notified. Well-organized paperwork makes the petition process more efficient and reduces the likelihood of procedural setbacks.
Once the court grants a Heggstad petition, the trustee will need to record the appropriate deed or document to update county records to reflect trust ownership. Anticipate this step by preparing a draft deed that comports with local recording requirements and by confirming any transfer taxes or filing fees that may apply. Verify the county recorder’s procedures in Marin County to ensure a smooth recording process and prevent further delays. Careful post-order follow-through completes the administrative corrective action the petition seeks to accomplish.
A Heggstad petition can be a practical solution when the decedent clearly intended assets to be part of a living trust but title records do not reflect that intent. If avoiding a broader probate administration for specific assets is desirable, this petition can be a focused, efficient remedy. It is particularly useful for real estate and other titled property where a single corrective court order will enable trustees to record proper title. For residents of Kentfield, this approach helps protect privacy and reduce time and expense compared to a full probate process for those isolated assets.
Consider this process when the facts supporting trust ownership are well documented and when heirs or beneficiaries are supportive or neutral, which reduces the potential for objections that could extend the matter. The Heggstad petition is also beneficial when quick resolution of title is needed to enable management or sale of property by the trustee. When questions of creditor claims or competing title exist, the petition can be paired with other administration steps to address those issues comprehensively and secure a durable transfer for the trust.
Typical circumstances include a deed that was never recorded into a trust, property purchased with trust funds but titled in the decedent’s name, or a last-minute estate plan change that was not reflected in public records. Other common triggers are bank or brokerage accounts that were intended to be transferred but remain in personal name, or newly acquired real property that was not retitled before death. These scenarios create a gap between the estate plan’s intent and the public title records, prompting a Heggstad petition to reconcile the discrepancy.
A common example is where a homeowner prepared a deed to transfer a house into a living trust but never recorded it, leaving the property in the decedent’s individual name at death. Such an omission prevents the trustee from taking straightforward title as trustee of the trust. Filing a Heggstad petition with the court demonstrates the intent to hold the property in trust and, when granted, allows the trustee to record the correct deed and proceed with management or distribution under the trust’s terms.
Sometimes assets are purchased using trust funds but are titled in the purchaser’s personal name due to oversight or timing. For instance, a vehicle or investment property acquired shortly before death may have been omitted from trust funding steps. A Heggstad petition can address these situations by presenting evidence that the funds and intent were tied to the trust, enabling the court to recognize trust ownership and allow the trustee to arrange title changes that reflect the trust’s interest in the asset.
Bank or brokerage accounts are sometimes left in the decedent’s name because retitling was not completed before death. While some accounts will transfer by beneficiary designation or payable-on-death arrangements, others require court action to recognize trust ownership if no designation exists. A Heggstad petition, supported by trust documentation and account records, can provide the court with the basis to order distribution of account assets to the trustee, helping consolidate trust assets and streamline administration without the need for broader probate proceedings.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Kentfield and throughout Marin County who need assistance with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. We guide trustees and families through the steps of documenting trust ownership, preparing petitions, and coordinating filings with the probate court and county recorder. With attention to detail and practical solutions, the firm helps clients resolve title discrepancies so trustees can carry out the trust maker’s wishes. For assistance, clients may contact the office by phone to discuss the specifics of their situation and next steps.
Choosing representation for a Heggstad petition means selecting a firm that understands California probate procedures, county recording practices, and the documentary requirements courts expect. Our office focuses on delivering thorough preparation, clear communication, and practical solutions tailored to the needs of trustees and beneficiaries. We assist in gathering evidence, drafting the petition and supporting declarations, and managing the notice and hearing process so that the court can evaluate the matter on a solid factual basis and reach an appropriate order.
Clients benefit from an organized approach to resolving title discrepancies, from initial document collection through post-order recording of deeds. We explain each step in accessible terms, help identify potential hurdles early, and work to minimize delays. Whether the case involves a single property or multiple assets, we coordinate all necessary tasks to reach a durable resolution that aligns recorded title with the decedent’s estate plan. For Kentfield residents, this approach reduces uncertainty and helps move administration forward efficiently.
When matters are contested or when multiple assets and parties are involved, the ability to develop a cohesive strategy is particularly valuable. The firm assists trustees in preparing evidence, responding to objections, and pursuing settlement where appropriate to avoid prolonged litigation. We also coordinate with county recorders and title companies to ensure the final recorded documents reflect the court’s order. This end-to-end support helps trustees complete asset transfers with confidence and preserves the trust maker’s intended distributions.
Our process begins with a confidential review of the trust instrument and the title history for the affected asset. We identify required documentation, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and coordinate notice to interested parties in accordance with probate rules. If a hearing is necessary, we represent the trustee or petitioner at the proceeding and respond to any objections. After obtaining a favorable court order, we assist with recording the necessary deed or paperwork to update county records. This stepwise approach helps ensure the petition accomplishes the intended title correction efficiently and correctly.
We start by assessing the estate plan, trust documents, and title records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy. This includes verifying ownership, reviewing deed instruments, and identifying interested parties. The goal is to assemble a complete evidentiary file that demonstrates the decedent’s intent and supports the request for recognition of trust ownership. Early investigation also helps identify potential objections or complications, so we can plan responses and reduce surprises later in the process.
Collecting a certified copy of the trust, any related deed drafts or recorded deeds, and contemporaneous documents that show intent is a priority. We also obtain a current title report and any account records or correspondence that tie the asset to the trust. Having these materials ready enables preparation of persuasive declarations and a coherent petition for the probate court. Accurate documentation forms the foundation of a successful petition and reduces the likelihood of additional discovery or evidentiary disputes later on.
Once the documents are in hand, we identify all heirs, beneficiaries, and potential creditors who must be notified under California probate rules. Timely and proper notice is essential to the petition’s validity and helps avoid procedural challenges. We prepare notice documents and serve them in the required manner so that interested parties have the opportunity to respond. Clear communication at this stage often reduces opposition and helps streamline the court’s review of the petition.
With supporting documents and notice prepared, we draft the petition and supporting declarations that explain the factual basis for recognizing the trust’s ownership. The filing includes a succinct recitation of the facts, exhibits such as the trust and deeds, and declarations from the trustee or witnesses. We ensure compliance with local court procedures and filing requirements in Marin County so the petition proceeds without procedural defects that could delay consideration by the probate judge.
Declarations play a central role in a Heggstad petition by presenting first-hand accounts of the decedent’s intent and events leading to the omitted transfer. We prepare declarations from the trustee, family members, or other witnesses, and compile exhibits such as trust excerpts, title reports, and any correspondence. These materials are organized to tell a clear, factual story to the court so that the judge can evaluate whether recognition of trust ownership is appropriate for the asset in question.
After preparing the petition and supporting materials, we file them with the probate court and serve required notice on interested parties. We follow Marin County procedures for submission and ensure filing fees and paperwork are handled correctly. Serving notice and filing the petition starts the statutory timelines for potential objections and hearings. Careful compliance with these procedural rules avoids technical challenges that could delay or complicate the court’s ability to act on the petition.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence and respond to any objections. When the judge grants the petition, the court issues an order recognizing the trust’s ownership of the specified asset. Following entry of the order, we assist the trustee in recording the necessary deed or document with the county recorder and in taking any additional administrative steps needed to transfer possession or effect sales. These final tasks complete the process of aligning title records with the trust’s terms.
At the hearing, the court reviews the factual record and any objections from interested parties. We present declarations and argument that explain why the asset should be treated as trust property, addressing legal and evidentiary questions raised by the court or opponents. If objections arise, we seek to resolve them through clarification, negotiation, or legal response, always aiming for a resolution that reflects the decedent’s documented intentions and protects the trustee’s ability to manage the asset on behalf of beneficiaries.
After the court issues its order, the trustee must record the necessary deed or documentation to transfer title into the trust’s name at the county recorder’s office. We prepare the recording instruments and coordinate with title companies or county clerks to ensure documents are accepted and indexed correctly. Proper recording completes the corrective process and provides a clear public record that the asset is held by the trust, allowing trustees and beneficiaries to manage or distribute property in accordance with the trust terms.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing in California that asks the court to recognize that certain assets recorded in a decedent’s name should have been part of a living trust and therefore are trust assets despite not being formally retitled before death. It is commonly used when a deed was not recorded in the trust’s name or when other titled assets were overlooked during the trust funding process. The petition sets out the factual background and attaches the trust and other supporting documents so the court can determine whether recognition is appropriate. The petition is appropriate in situations where the documentation clearly indicates the decedent’s intent to fund the trust and where a court order declaring the asset as trust property will allow title to be updated without the need for full probate administration for that asset. The process requires careful collection of evidence and proper notice to interested parties, and the court will evaluate the petition based on the documentary record and any objections that may be filed.
Typically, the trustee named in the trust, an executor acting for the estate, or another interested party who stands to benefit can file a Heggstad petition on behalf of the trust. The petitioner must present sufficient documentation to show that the decedent intended the assets to be governed by the trust and that the failure to retitle was an oversight or administrative mistake. Petitioners should be prepared to identify all interested parties and comply with statutory notice requirements so the court can consider any potential objections. Filing party selection depends on the trust’s terms and the estate circumstances; trustees often have a direct interest in clarifying title to enable management or disposition of trust property. When uncertainties or disputes exist, coordination among heirs and beneficiaries can facilitate a smoother petition process and reduce the likelihood of contested hearings in probate court.
Support for a Heggstad petition typically includes a certified copy of the trust instrument, any deeds or draft deeds showing the intended transfer, a current title report, and declarations or affidavits from the trustee, family members, or others who can attest to the decedent’s intent. Account statements, purchase documents, or correspondence that tie assets to the trust are useful in building the factual record. The court looks for clear documentary and testimonial evidence that the decedent wanted the asset to be held by the trust. In addition to direct evidence, it helps to present a concise timeline and explanation of why the transfer was not completed before death, showing that the omission was not intended to defeat heirs or creditors. Organized exhibits and persuasive declarations reduce the need for further court-ordered discovery and increase the likelihood of a favorable ruling recognizing the trust’s ownership.
The time frame for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the title issue, whether interested parties object, and the court’s calendar. In straightforward, uncontested cases with complete documentation, the matter can move relatively quickly through filing, notice, and a hearing, sometimes within a few months. However, if there are multiple assets, contested claims, or requests for additional discovery, the process can take longer. Local court procedures in Marin County and the need for any additional fact-finding will affect timing. Early preparation and clear communication with heirs and interested parties often shorten the timeline. By assembling documents, obtaining declarations, and resolving potential objections informally when possible, petitioners can reduce delays and reach a court order more efficiently. Prompt post-order recording also completes the corrective action in a timely manner.
A Heggstad petition addresses the title for specific assets and can be used to avoid full probate for those particular items when the court recognizes them as trust property. It does not automatically eliminate the need for any probate processes related to other estate matters, but it can reduce the scope of probate by resolving ownership for the identified assets. This targeted remedy is often preferred when the decedent’s estate plan intended certain property to be in the trust but records do not reflect that intent. If significant assets remain outside the trust or if creditor claims and contested issues arise, additional probate actions may be required. The Heggstad petition is most effective as part of an overall plan to consolidate and administer trust assets, and it should be coordinated with any necessary estate administration steps to ensure all legal obligations are satisfied.
Yes, heirs, beneficiaries, or creditors may challenge a Heggstad petition if they disagree with the assertion that the asset was intended to be in the trust or if they believe their rights would be impaired. Objections can raise factual disputes about the decedent’s intent, the sufficiency of documentation, or concerns about creditors. When objections are filed, the court may require additional evidentiary support, depositions, or a more extended litigation process to resolve competing claims. To reduce the risk of challenges, petitioners should assemble strong documentary evidence, provide clear and timely notice to interested parties, and, where possible, seek informal agreement from heirs. When disputes cannot be resolved informally, presenting a well-documented case at hearing and addressing objections with legal responses helps the court reach a reasoned decision on the merits of the petition.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include initiating a full probate administration, pursuing a trust modification if the trust maker’s intent is documented and allowable, or using informal settlement agreements among heirs and beneficiaries when all parties agree. Probate may be necessary when multiple assets or significant creditor issues are present, but it is typically more time-consuming and public. Trust modification may adjust terms but will not necessarily correct title defects for already recorded property without court action. When parties are in agreement, interparty agreements and coordinated filings with the county recorder may sometimes resolve title issues without litigation, but these approaches require unanimous cooperation and clear documentation. The choice among alternatives depends on the specific facts, the number and types of assets involved, and the willingness of interested parties to collaborate.
After a court grants a Heggstad petition, the trustee typically obtains a certified copy of the court order and uses it as authority to record the appropriate deed or documentation with the county recorder. Recording updates the public record to reflect the trust’s ownership and allows the trustee to manage, sell, or transfer the property according to the trust’s terms. Completing the recording is an essential administrative step that finalizes the title correction initiated by the petition. In addition to recording, trustees may need to coordinate with title companies, lenders, or governmental agencies to clear any remaining encumbrances or to update account registrations. These follow-up tasks ensure that the practical consequences of the court’s order are fully implemented so beneficiaries receive the intended benefits under the trust.
The cost of pursuing a Heggstad petition varies by the complexity of the matter, the amount of documentary and legal work required, and whether the petition is contested. Expenses typically include court filing fees, title reports, notary and copy costs, and legal fees for drafting the petition and attending hearings. In uncontested matters with straightforward documentation, costs are often moderate, but when evidentiary development or contested litigation is needed, expenses can increase accordingly. To manage costs, petitioners should gather thorough documentation early and attempt informal resolution with interested parties where feasible. Clear planning and efficient preparation reduce the likelihood of extended court proceedings and help keep fees and delays within reasonable bounds for trustees and beneficiaries.
Families can reduce the likelihood of needing a Heggstad petition by taking proactive steps during life to ensure all titled assets are properly retitled into the trust and by maintaining accurate records. Regular reviews of deeds, account registrations, and beneficiary designations help identify and correct discrepancies before they become problems. Coordinating with a trusted estate planning advisor to confirm that newly acquired assets are titled correctly can prevent the need for corrective court filings after death. Clear documentation, consistent record keeping, and periodic estate plan reviews also help ensure that the trust reflects current holdings and intentions. When changes in property ownership occur, prompt updating of trust schedules and deeds will reduce the potential for missed transfers that later require a Heggstad petition to fix.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas