A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used in California to confirm that certain assets are properly part of a trust even when title to those assets was not formally retitled into the trust before a grantor’s death. For residents of Lagunitas-Forest Knolls, this process can be essential to completing the estate plan intentions set out in a trust document and to avoiding unnecessary probate. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize trust ownership, which allows property to pass according to the trust terms rather than through probate. This introduction outlines what to expect and how the petition fits with common trust administration steps in Marin County.
When a trustmaker intended certain property to be included in a revocable living trust but title remains in the decedent’s name, beneficiaries and trustees may need legal confirmation that those assets belong to the trust. The Heggstad petition process clarifies ownership and prevents delays in distributing assets to beneficiaries or managing property held by the trust. In many situations in Lagunitas-Forest Knolls, that involves residential real estate, bank accounts, or other titled assets. Understanding the petition, timelines, evidence requirements, and potential outcomes helps families move forward with trust administration while minimizing dispute and administrative friction.
A Heggstad petition provides legal recognition that assets belong to a trust when formal retitling was not completed. The benefits include preserving the intended distribution plan of the trustmaker, avoiding broader probate procedures, and enabling trustees to manage or transfer property without prolonged uncertainty. For family members and trustees in Marin County, the petition can speed access to funds needed for estate administration, reduce exposure to creditor claims that are limited by trust administration rules, and offer a clear judicial finding of ownership that will be respected by title companies, banks, and other third parties.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to individuals and families across California. Our approach emphasizes careful documentation, proactive communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and strategic preparation of petitions and supporting evidence. When assisting with a Heggstad petition for clients in Lagunitas-Forest Knolls and surrounding Marin County communities, we focus on assembling clear proof of intent, preparing declarations and exhibits for court filings, and coordinating with title companies or financial institutions so that recognition of trust ownership proceeds without avoidable delay. The goal is a predictable, efficient outcome that aligns with the trustmaker’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition typically asks a probate or superior court to declare that certain property should be treated as trust property despite not being formally retitled. The petitioner, often a trustee or successor trustee, must present evidence such as the trust document, declarations of witnesses, transfer documents, correspondence, or other indicia of the trustmaker’s intent. The court assesses whether clear and convincing evidence supports the claim and may issue an order that enables the trustee to manage, sell, or transfer the asset in accordance with the trust terms. This step is especially relevant when title companies or financial institutions require a court order before transferring assets into a trust.
The characteristic elements of a Heggstad petition include factual declarations, authenticated trust copies, and documentary proof linking the asset to the trustmaker’s intent. The process can involve notice to heirs and beneficiaries, possible response periods, and, in some cases, a hearing. Evidence can include beneficiary lists, correspondence showing intent to transfer, and prior attempts to retitle assets. Trustees pursuing a petition should be prepared for the court to evaluate both procedural and substantive facts. The petition is a focused remedy intended to confirm ownership rather than to re-litigate broader trust validity issues.
In California practice, a Heggstad petition is an action filed to have the court declare that property belongs to a trust because the decedent intended it to be part of the trust even though title was never changed. The name comes from case law addressing this remedy and it functions as a judicial means of filling a gap when administrative retitling was incomplete before death. It is not a replacement for proper estate planning but rather a solution when inconsistencies between intent and formal title threaten to disrupt orderly administration. The petition allows trustees to move forward under the trust’s terms with court-sanctioned authority.
Filing a Heggstad petition typically requires assembling the trust instrument, a certified copy of the death certificate, declarations from the trustee and from those who can attest to the decedent’s intent, and any documents showing prior attempts to transfer title. The trustee must also provide appropriate notices to heirs and affected parties. Once the petition is filed, the court may set a hearing or rule on the papers, and if granted, will issue an order confirming trust ownership. Successful petitions rely on organized, clear documentary proof and thoughtful presentation of facts to the court.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate the process. Definitions such as trust, trustee, probate, title, transfer on death, and Heggstad petition clarify roles and procedures. These terms appear throughout court pleadings and communications with banks, title companies, and other institutions. Reviewing the glossary ensures that petitioners know what documents and facts the court will consider and helps in preparing declarations and exhibits. Knowing the terminology reduces confusion during the trust administration process and helps families make informed decisions about filings in Marin County courts.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which one party, the trustee, holds title to property for the benefit of designated beneficiaries according to the terms set by the trustmaker. A revocable living trust is commonly used in estate planning to set instructions for asset management and distribution, while allowing the trustmaker to modify terms during their lifetime. When a Heggstad petition is needed, it is often because assets intended to be held by the trust were never formally retitled, creating a gap between documented intent and recorded title that the petition seeks to reconcile through a court order.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing asking the court to declare that property should be treated as trust property despite not being formally titled in the trust’s name. This petition is used when evidence shows the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust but administrative steps were incomplete before death. By obtaining a court order, trustees can resolve title issues and proceed with management or distribution. The petition typically includes declarations, copies of the trust, and supporting documents that demonstrate intent and link the property to the trustmaker’s plan.
A trustee is an individual or entity charged with carrying out the terms of a trust and managing trust assets in the beneficiaries’ interests. The trustee has a fiduciary duty to follow the trust terms and to make decisions that protect trust assets. When title issues arise, the trustee may file a Heggstad petition to obtain judicial confirmation of ownership so the trustee can perform duties such as selling property, transferring assets, or allocating funds according to the trust. Trustees should keep thorough records to support petitions and to satisfy legal obligations during administration.
Probate is the court-supervised process for distributing assets that are in the decedent’s name alone and were not transferred by beneficiary designation or by a trust. One purpose of many estate plans is to minimize assets that go through probate. When property intended for a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition can reduce the scope of probate by confirming trust ownership, thereby allowing the trust’s terms to control distribution rather than formal probate administration for that asset. The petition can therefore streamline outcomes for beneficiaries and trustees.
When addressing untitled trust assets, trustees and beneficiaries have several options, including informal claims with institutions, full probate administration, or a Heggstad petition. Informal resolution with banks or title companies can work when documentation persuades a third party, but institutions may still require court confirmation. Probate is more time-consuming and public, and it can impose additional costs. A Heggstad petition offers a targeted court remedy focusing on ownership recognition, often preventing the need for full probate for specific assets. Choosing among these paths depends on the documents available, the institutions involved, and the complexity of the estate.
A limited approach may be appropriate when the trust instrument and surrounding documents clearly show the trustmaker intended a specific asset to be in the trust and the title issue is administrative in nature. Evidence might include signed trust provisions referencing the asset, correspondence about planned transfers, beneficiary designations, or bank statements indicating trust management. In these cases, a narrowly tailored Heggstad petition or even institutional acceptance based on the documents can resolve the issue. The key consideration is whether the available records create a persuasive factual showing of intent and ownership.
A targeted filing or an agreed resolution can work well when beneficiaries and close family members are in agreement and there are no competing claims to the asset. When all interested parties support treating the property as trust property, institutions often cooperate and the court may be unnecessary. A Heggstad petition remains an option when a formal order is desired for clear title or when a title company requires it for closing on a real estate transaction. The absence of disputes can significantly shorten the timeline and reduce costs related to resolving title and ownership questions.
A comprehensive approach becomes important when assets have complex title histories, multiple transfers, or potential competing claims from heirs or creditors. In those situations, preparing a robust Heggstad petition, conducting careful investigation, and coordinating additional filings may be necessary to secure court recognition and protect the trustee from future challenges. Comprehensive work can include title searches, additional declarations, and supplemental pleadings to address objections. Engaging in this fuller process helps ensure that the court’s order is sufficiently grounded to withstand later disputes and that beneficiaries’ interests are safeguarded.
When title companies, lenders, or financial institutions require formal judicial confirmation before they will process a transfer or closing, a comprehensive petition and supporting exhibits are often necessary. Real estate transactions are a common context where institutions seek a court order to clear title clouds, permit sales, or complete refinancing. Preparing for these institutional requirements may involve extra steps such as neutral expert reports, additional notices, or more detailed evidentiary support. Addressing these needs proactively reduces the risk of delays at critical moments in trust administration or asset disposition.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition helps ensure that the court’s ruling addresses potential weaknesses and anticipates likely objections. By presenting complete documentation, clear witness declarations, and careful legal argument, the trustee improves the odds of obtaining an order that will be honored by third parties. This approach also protects trustees by creating a clear judicial record of the facts relied upon, which can reduce exposure to later claims and support smoother interactions with title companies and financial institutions who require certainty before transferring or reconveying assets.
Beyond immediate title clearance, a thorough process contributes to longer-term estate administration efficiency. A court order confirming trust ownership can speed distributions, allow sales of property when needed, and reduce the risk of surprises for beneficiaries. Comprehensive preparation also helps avoid multiple filings or supplemental proceedings later on. For families in Lagunitas-Forest Knolls and surrounding communities, investing in careful preparation can reduce cumulative legal costs and administrative burdens by resolving ownership questions decisively and enabling trustees to carry out the trustmaker’s directions with confidence.
When the court issues a detailed order after a fully supported petition, it becomes harder for unknown parties to challenge trust ownership later on. A comprehensive submission that catalogues evidence and addresses potential objections decreases uncertainty and provides a durable record for title companies and courts. That record can deter frivolous claims and clarify the trustee’s authority to manage, sell, or distribute assets according to trust terms. This stability benefits beneficiaries by avoiding repeated litigation and by enabling a more predictable administration process.
A carefully prepared petition and supporting documentation can shorten the time to secure a court order and thereby permit faster access to funds or enable property sales when needed. For trustees managing ongoing expenses, debts, or real estate transactions, clarity in ownership prevents unnecessary transaction delays. Title companies are more inclined to clear titles when a court’s order is clear and detailed, helping transactions proceed without prolonged escrow holds. This practical benefit often outweighs the upfront effort of preparing a thorough filing.
Start by collecting all relevant documents that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and any attempts to transfer title. Useful items include the trust instrument, deeds, bank statements, correspondence, receipts related to the asset, and any record of conversations about transferring property. A well-organized file makes it easier to prepare a persuasive petition and helps reduce delays when the court requests additional evidence. Providing a chronological narrative that links the trust terms to the asset in question will strengthen the petition and facilitate smoother communications with third parties like title companies.
Contact banks, title companies, and other institutions early in the process to understand their requirements for recognizing trust ownership. Some institutions may accept documentation and a certified copy of the trust, while others will insist on a court order. Identifying these requirements early helps determine whether a petition is necessary and allows for coordinated timing between filing and any scheduled transactions. Early communication can also reveal what additional evidence the institution will accept, letting the trustee tailor the petition to address those specific concerns.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name and institutions or potential buyers require formal confirmation before transferring or selling. The petition provides a targeted court process to confirm ownership, which helps trustees manage assets according to the trust’s instructions and can avoid broader probate proceedings. For many families, the petition is an effective way to honor the trustmaker’s intent without subjecting assets to full probate administration, reducing both delay and public exposure of estate details.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when unclear title impedes necessary transactions such as paying final expenses, settling debts, or selling real property. A court order clarifying trust ownership protects trustees by giving them authorization to act and provides third parties with the assurance they need to transfer or reconvey title. When heirs or beneficiaries are uncertain about the ownership status of particular assets, the petition can remove ambiguity and support efficient, orderly administration while protecting family relationships during a difficult time.
Common circumstances include a trustmaker who created a trust but did not complete deed transfers for real property, bank accounts left in the decedent’s name, retirement accounts without beneficiary updates, or assets acquired shortly before death. Institutions often require an order where title is inconsistent with trust documents. Disputes among heirs or missing documentation can also necessitate a petition to resolve ownership issues. Recognizing these scenarios early allows trustees to gather necessary evidence and to plan for possible court involvement in Marin County.
One frequent circumstance is a home or other real property that remains titled in the decedent’s name despite the existence of a revocable living trust. Lenders, title companies, or buyers may refuse to proceed without a court order or a clear title transfer, because the recorded deed does not reflect the trust. A Heggstad petition can confirm that the trustmaker intended the property to be governed by the trust, enabling a sale, refinance, or transfer to be completed under the trust terms and reducing the risk of unintended probate proceedings for that parcel of real estate.
Financial accounts that were intended to be trust assets but remain in the decedent’s individual name can create difficulty for trustees needing access to funds for estate administration. Institutions may require a court order to allow the trustee to withdraw funds or transfer accounts into the trust. A Heggstad petition can supply the necessary judicial confirmation when documentation of intent exists but the formal retitling was never completed. Obtaining an order helps trustees manage cash flow for obligations such as bills, taxes, or distributions to beneficiaries.
When an asset was acquired shortly before the trustmaker’s death and there was insufficient time to retitle the property into the trust, institutions and heirs may question whether the asset was intended to be part of the trust. In such cases, evidence of intent—such as notes, correspondence, or witness testimony—can support a Heggstad petition to clarify ownership. The court’s determination allows trustees to treat those assets consistently with the overall estate plan and prevents unexpected probate ramifications for recently acquired property.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides compassionate, practical assistance to families and trustees in Lagunitas-Forest Knolls and greater Marin County facing title and trust administration issues. We work to assemble the record needed for a Heggstad petition, communicate with institutions, and present a clear case to the court so trustees can proceed with asset management or transfers. Our goal is to reduce administrative burdens and to facilitate timely resolution of ownership questions so that beneficiaries receive assets according to the trustmaker’s plan.
Clients choose our firm for attentive, organized service when dealing with delicate post-death administration issues. We prioritize clear communication, careful document review, and practical guidance about the evidentiary showing the court will expect. For trustees in Marin County, having a methodical approach to assembling declarations, exhibits, and notices streamlines the filing process and helps avoid unnecessary delays. Our work aims to minimize friction with title companies and financial institutions so trust administration proceeds efficiently and respectfully.
We also focus on working collaboratively with family members and stakeholders to reduce the likelihood of disputes and to identify the most efficient route toward title resolution. Whether the matter requires a narrowly focused petition or a more comprehensive strategy, we assess the facts and recommend a path designed to achieve reliable recognition of trust ownership. Clear court orders protect trustees and beneficiaries and help fulfill the trustmaker’s intent with minimal disruption to estate administration.
Finally, we assist trustees in anticipating institutional requirements and in preparing the documentation that will be persuasive to banks, title companies, and the court. Our aim is to support trustees through each procedural step, manage communications with other parties when appropriate, and obtain the judicial acknowledgment needed to allow property to be handled according to the trust’s terms. This focused advocacy helps preserve family relationships and enables timely distributions where appropriate.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and related documents to evaluate the strength of proof that the asset belongs to the trust. We identify required notices, assemble supporting declarations and exhibits, and communicate with institutions that may have a role in recognizing trust ownership. We draft and file the petition, monitor response periods, and, if needed, prepare for a hearing. Throughout the process, we keep trustees informed, help coordinate title company expectations, and pursue a timely court order to enable trust administration to proceed.
The first step is a careful document review to determine what evidence exists showing the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. This includes obtaining a certified copy of the trust, death certificate, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any notes or drafts indicating planned transfers. We also identify potential witnesses and gather declarations. This foundational work shapes the petition and reduces the chance of follow-up requests from the court or institutions, enabling a smoother path to securing an order that confirms trust ownership.
We begin by assembling the trust document, deed records, and any filings related to the asset. Reviewing recorded documents provides clarity on the current title status and reveals gaps between the trust instrument and recorded ownership. Where necessary, we order certified copies or conduct title searches to document the chain of title. Accurate and complete documentation of historical transactions and the trust’s language is essential to present a compelling case to the court and to satisfy the requirements of title companies or financial institutions.
We prepare declarations from the trustee and from witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent or actions taken to transfer the asset. These statements focus on concrete facts such as conversations, written instructions, or actions demonstrating intent. We guide declarants on content and format so their statements are clear, focused, and legally effective. Well-crafted declarations form the backbone of a Heggstad petition by tying the asset to the trustmaker’s plan and by explaining why formal retitling did not occur prior to death.
After the evidentiary record is assembled, we prepare and file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate California court and serve all required parties, including heirs and beneficiaries. Proper service and timely compliance with notice requirements are essential to prevent objections based on procedural defects. The filing includes the petition, declarations, trust copies, and supporting exhibits. Once filed, we monitor response periods, address any objections raised, and coordinate with the court and opposing parties to move toward resolution or a hearing if necessary.
The petition itself sets forth the factual basis for court confirmation of trust ownership and includes the trust instrument and key documents as exhibits. We organize exhibits in a logical sequence and draft clear statements of facts that show the trustmaker’s intent and the asset’s connection to the trust. Careful exhibit preparation helps courts and third parties understand the case quickly and reduces the likelihood of additional requests for information. This stage is where the earlier document gathering is assembled into a persuasive court filing.
After filing, we serve required notices on heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties in compliance with California rules. Proper service ensures that the court can reach a final disposition without procedural challenge. We monitor any responses or objections, engage in discussions or informal resolution when appropriate, and prepare replies or supplemental evidence to address concerns raised by other parties. Effective management of responses minimizes delay and often leads to settlement or a streamlined hearing.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence, anticipate potential questions, and argue for a clear order confirming that the asset is trust property. When the court grants the petition, it issues an order that can be recorded with the county or provided to financial institutions and title companies to clear title. We then assist trustees in implementing the court’s order, completing any required filings or recordings, and coordinating with title companies to finalize property transfers or sales in accordance with the trust terms.
At the hearing, the court evaluates the factual record and may ask questions about the trustmaker’s intent, the documentation provided, and any steps taken to retitle the asset prior to death. We prepare to present a clear narrative supported by the collected declarations and documentary evidence. Clear presentation helps the court issue an order that third parties will accept. When objections exist, the hearing also provides an opportunity to resolve disputes through legal argument or settlement before the judge issues a final ruling.
Following a favorable order, we assist in recording the order where necessary and in delivering certified copies to banks, title companies, or other institutions that require formal confirmation. Recording or providing the court order enables trustees to complete sales, transfers, or account changes. We coordinate with escrow and title officers to ensure the order satisfies their requirements, and we follow up to confirm that transactions proceed. This final step closes the loop, allowing trustees to act in accordance with the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial filing asking the court to declare that a particular asset should be treated as part of a trust even though title was not formally transferred before the trustmaker’s death. It is commonly used when real property, bank accounts, or other titled assets remain recorded in the decedent’s name and institutions or buyers demand formal confirmation before allowing transfer or sale. The petition relies on evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent that the asset belong to the trust and requests a court order to effect that recognition. This petition is typically narrower than full probate because it focuses only on establishing ownership of the specific asset or assets at issue. When successful, the petition produces a court order that third parties will accept as authorization to transfer, sell, or otherwise handle the asset according to the trust’s terms. The remedy is practical for trustees seeking to avoid broader probate implications while ensuring property is administered in line with the trustmaker’s wishes.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the court’s calendar, the complexity of the facts, and whether any objections arise. In straightforward cases with clear documentary proof and no disputes among heirs, a petition can often be resolved within a few months. This timeline includes time for preparing the petition, serving required notices, and waiting out any statutory response periods. When a hearing is necessary, scheduling availability at the local superior court also affects timing. Complex matters such as contested ownership, missing documentation, or multiple interested parties can extend the process significantly. In such situations, additional discovery or supplemental filings may be required, and resolution may take longer. Early organization of evidence and proactive communications with potential interested parties help reduce delays and improve the prospects of a timely resolution in Marin County courts.
Supportive evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust document, a certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate, deeds or account statements, correspondence or notes showing intent to transfer the asset into the trust, and declarations from the trustee or witnesses. Title records and any prior attempts to retitle the asset are also helpful. The court looks for a persuasive link between the trustmaker’s intent and the asset’s present status rather than mere assertion of intent without corroboration. Declarations should be factual, describing specific conversations, steps taken toward retitling, or the trustmaker’s practices regarding asset management. For real property matters, providing a clear chain of title and any pre-death actions such as signed deeds or escrow instructions strengthens the petition. Organizing these materials chronologically helps the court understand the sequence of events and the reasons retitling was not completed before death.
A Heggstad petition can prevent a specific asset from going through probate if the court determines the asset should be treated as trust property. However, it applies only to the asset or assets identified in the petition and does not automatically remove other assets from probate. The petition is designed to address gaps where formal retitling was incomplete, allowing those assets to be distributed under the trust’s terms rather than by probate procedures. If multiple assets remain untitled, separate petitions or additional documentation may be necessary to clear each asset. In situations where widespread retitling failures exist, a more comprehensive approach or limited probate may still be required. Trustees should inventory assets carefully and plan filings strategically to minimize the need for broader probate involvement.
When filing a Heggstad petition, trustees must serve notice on interested parties such as heirs, beneficiaries, and sometimes creditors, in accordance with California procedural rules. Proper service is essential to ensure the court’s jurisdiction and to provide parties the opportunity to object. The exact notice requirements depend on the nature of the petition and the identity of interested persons, but failure to provide adequate notice can result in delays or dismissal of the petition. Identifying and serving all required parties early reduces the risk of procedural disputes. In some instances, parties may choose to waive formal notice or to stipulate to the petition, which can speed the process. We assist trustees in determining who must be served and in completing service in a manner that complies with court rules to preserve the integrity of the filing.
Some title companies or financial institutions will accept documentation such as a certified trust copy and supporting declarations without a court order, particularly if the factual record is clear and no competing claims exist. Their policies vary, and certain transactions—especially those involving real estate sales or lender requirements—often prompt institutions to insist on a court order before completing a transfer. Institutions evaluate risk and may have internal thresholds that determine when judicial confirmation is necessary. When an institution requires a court order, a Heggstad petition provides the formal recognition they need. Anticipating institutional requirements early allows trustees to decide whether to prepare a petition or to pursue institutional acceptance through documentation and negotiation. We work with trustees to identify institutional expectations and to prepare filings that align with those requirements to prevent last-minute obstacles during transactions.
Failing to address untitled trust assets can lead to several complications. Without a Heggstad petition or other resolution, institutions may refuse to recognize the trust’s authority, preventing trustees from accessing funds needed for estate administration, paying debts, or distributing assets to beneficiaries. This can delay necessary actions and may force trustees to pursue full probate for the affected assets, creating additional time and expense for the estate and beneficiaries. Unresolved title issues can also increase the risk of disputes among heirs or claims from creditors, particularly if the asset remains in the decedent’s name and appears to be part of the probate estate. Taking proactive steps to clarify ownership through a petition or negotiated resolution helps preserve orderly administration and protect trustees from uncertain liabilities associated with holding or disposing of assets that institutions will not accept without judicial confirmation.
When heirs object to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objections and may set a hearing to resolve disputed facts. Objections can raise issues such as competing claims of intent, questions about the trust’s validity, or challenges to the factual record. The court assesses the evidence and applies standards of proof appropriate to the petition, allowing each side to present declarations, documents, and legal arguments to support their position. Many disputes are resolved through negotiation or stipulation prior to hearing, which can be efficient and preserve relationships among family members. If an objection proceeds to hearing, thorough preparation and organized presentation of the evidentiary record are critical. The court’s decision will depend on the comparative strength of the evidence establishing the trustmaker’s intent and the applicable legal principles governing such petitions.
Whether trustees can recover legal costs related to a Heggstad petition depends on the trust terms and the court’s discretion. Some trust instruments contain provisions authorizing the payment of reasonable trustee fees and legal costs from trust assets for administration. When such provisions exist, courts typically allow trustees to use trust funds to pay necessary and reasonable expenses incurred while performing their duties, which may include legal fees for filing a Heggstad petition when it is needed to administer the trust properly. In the absence of an express trust provision, recovery of legal costs may be more uncertain and could depend on statutory authority or court determinations about the reasonableness of the expenses. Trustees should document the necessity and reasonableness of legal services provided and consult with counsel about fee requests and the best approach to protecting trust assets while complying with fiduciary obligations.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary depending on complexity, required filings, and whether hearings are needed. Court filing fees represent one component, while attorney fees, costs associated with obtaining certified documents, title searches, and service of process contribute to the overall expense. Simple, uncontested petitions that proceed on written submissions may be less costly than contested matters that require hearings and additional evidentiary work. The local court’s schedule and the need for supplemental filings also affect the final cost. Providing an accurate estimate requires review of the specific facts and the assets involved. Trustees should expect to budget for both filing and administrative expenses and to weigh the costs of a petition against the potential expense and delay of probate or other alternatives. We provide initial consultations to assess likely steps and offer planning guidance about cost-effective resolution strategies.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas