A Heggstad petition can be a pivotal step for families and trustees when a trust transfer did not occur as intended. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition is, when it may be appropriate in Marin City and nearby Marin County, and how our Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman approach these matters. We focus on clear communication, practical planning options, and carefully preparing documentation to help trustees or beneficiaries obtain a court order confirming that trust assets should be treated as part of the trust despite a missed transfer. Our goal is to help you understand options and next steps available under California law.
Many people discover a transfer to a trust was never completed after a key event such as an estate administration or property sale. A Heggstad petition asks a California court to treat property as if it had been transferred to a trust during the settlor’s lifetime, which can prevent probate and respect the settlor’s estate plan. In Marin City and throughout California, timing, documentation, and witness statements can affect the outcome. We will outline typical scenarios, likely documents and evidence, and how a petition is filed and prosecuted so you have a clear roadmap for deciding whether to pursue this remedy.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the intent of a settlor who intended assets to be in a trust but where a transfer was not completed. Successful petitions can avoid probate for the asset in question, align asset ownership with the estate plan, and reduce administrative burdens for heirs. The process can also create a judicial determination that clarifies ownership, facilitating subsequent transactions such as property sales or title transfers. For families in Marin City, this legal action can simplify distribution, protect privacy, and provide peace of mind that the settlor’s documented wishes will be honored under California law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handles estate planning and trust-related litigation for clients across Marin County and the Bay Area. Our firm brings practical knowledge of California trust law to each Heggstad petition, focusing on careful review of trust documents, supporting affidavits, and chain-of-title evidence. We prioritize client communication, ensuring you understand the legal steps, likely costs, and estimated timelines. Our approach balances procedural rigor with sensitivity to family dynamics so that petitions are prepared thoroughly and respectfully, seeking efficient resolution while protecting client interests in a contested or uncertain transfer situation.
A Heggstad petition is a mechanism under California law for asking a court to treat property as owned by a trust despite a transfer never being completed. This occurs when the settlor clearly intended to transfer assets but administrative steps were omitted. The petition requires evidence demonstrating intent, such as trust documents, correspondence, deeds, and witness declarations. Courts consider whether the settlor wanted the property in the trust and whether parties acted in reliance on that intent. Understanding the elements of a petition helps trustees and beneficiaries prepare the necessary documentation and craft a persuasive, legally sound presentation to the court.
Preparing a Heggstad petition typically involves gathering documentary proof, securing declarations from relevant witnesses, and assembling a record showing the settlor’s intent and surrounding circumstances. The petition is filed in the appropriate California probate court, which will consider both legal arguments and factual evidence. Responses from other interested parties may prompt negotiation or court proceedings. Timing and careful attention to title issues are important, especially when real property is involved. Understanding these steps helps petitioners anticipate potential challenges and plan for a resolution that aligns with the settlor’s estate planning goals.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to declare that property should be treated as if it had been transferred to a trust during the settlor’s lifetime. The petition is commonly used when deeds, bank transfers, or retitling did not occur as intended, yet documented evidence indicates the settlor’s desire to place assets in trust. The court evaluates the intent of the settlor and surrounding evidence to determine whether to recognize the trust’s ownership. This remedy is particularly relevant when avoiding probate is a priority, or when title clarification is necessary to carry out the settlor’s estate plan without further delay.
Key elements of a Heggstad petition include demonstration of the settlor’s intent, evidence of an incomplete transfer, and an explanation of why treating the asset as trust property aligns with the settlor’s estate plan. The process involves document collection, drafting the petition, serving interested parties, and presenting evidence to the probate court. Negotiation with potentially opposing parties can sometimes resolve disputes without a contested hearing. The court will look for credible documentation or testimony showing how the settlor intended ownership to be handled, and for any equitable reasons to grant the requested relief under California probate rules.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad petitions helps petitioners and interested parties follow the proceedings and prepare necessary materials. This glossary explains basic phrases such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, chain of title, and constructive trust. Knowing these concepts clarifies how evidence and legal standards relate to your situation, which documents matter most, and what outcome the court might order. Having a clear grasp of these terms supports more effective communication with counsel and smoother preparation of declarations and documentary exhibits for court review.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and whose intent to place assets into the trust is at issue in a Heggstad petition. Evidence of the settlor’s instructions, draft documents, and contemporaneous communications can be critical to proving intent. The settlor’s mental capacity at the relevant time and any relevant changes to estate planning documents also factor into the court’s analysis. Demonstrating a clear line of intent from the settlor to include the asset in the trust strengthens the petition and supports a favorable determination that the asset should be treated as trust property.
Deeds and title instruments are legal documents used to transfer real property ownership. In Heggstad matters, an omitted deed or improperly recorded instrument often triggers the petition. Evidence such as unrecorded deeds, draft transfers, or correspondence showing intent to transfer can be presented to the court. The petition should explain why the deed was not recorded and present supporting declarations or documents showing the settlor’s intention to make the trust the rightful owner. The court reviews the title history and related evidence when considering whether to treat the property as trust-owned.
The trustee is the person or institution responsible for administering the trust and managing trust assets, while beneficiaries are those entitled to receive distributions. In a Heggstad petition, a trustee may petition the court to confirm that the asset is trust property, or beneficiaries may request a determination to ensure proper administration. The roles and interests of trustees and beneficiaries will influence who has standing to file a petition and how the court weighs competing claims. Clear documentation of trustee actions and beneficiary expectations can support the petition.
Chain of title refers to the history of ownership for a particular asset, especially real property. Establishing a clear chain of title is important in Heggstad petitions because the court must determine whether ownership should be recognized in the trust despite a gap in formal transfer. Documents such as prior deeds, escrow instructions, trust documents, and witness declarations can show the intended flow of ownership. Demonstrating a consistent pattern of intent and steps taken toward transfer helps the court conclude that the trust should hold the asset.
When a transfer to a trust is incomplete, there are several potential remedies including a Heggstad petition, corrective deeds, or probate proceedings if title is disputed. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration treating property as trust-owned, which can avoid full probate when successful. Corrective deeds can sometimes fix title issues without court involvement if all parties agree, while probate may be necessary when no trust remedy applies. Choosing among these options depends on factors such as the asset type, parties’ willingness to cooperate, the clarity of documentation, and timing considerations under California law.
If all involved parties agree, a corrective deed or direct transfer of title can resolve the omitted transfer without court intervention. This pathway is often faster and less costly than filing a petition when cooperation is possible. Evidence of mutual agreement, signed acknowledgments, and complete documentation are still essential to prove the intention behind the transfer. Parties should carefully draft corrective instruments to align with the trust terms and record them properly to avoid future disputes related to chain of title or ownership claims.
When strong, undisputed documentation shows the settlor intended transfer and no party contests ownership, a simple recording of the appropriate instrument may suffice. In such situations litigation can often be avoided by presenting the documents to title companies or lenders to clear matters for sale or refinancing. However, even with clear documentation, professionals may advise confirming the record through appropriate instruments to ensure smooth future transactions and to prevent unexpected claims or title issues from arising later on.
When multiple parties dispute whether the settlor intended an asset to be part of a trust, or when competing claims arise, a formal court filing may be the most reliable way to secure a definitive resolution. A Heggstad petition provides judicial determination that addresses title, ownership, and administration questions in a manner enforceable against future claims. Preparing a comprehensive legal filing involves assembling a persuasive record, obtaining witness declarations, and anticipating defenses, which helps protect the trust’s administration and beneficiaries’ interests through a transparent legal process.
When property is encumbered by liens, mortgages, or complex title histories, resolving ownership through a court order can be the most effective approach. A Heggstad petition can address competing interests and instruct the court to treat the assets as trust-owned despite recording gaps. This process helps clear title for sale, refinance, or distribution while addressing creditor or lienholder concerns. Handling such matters requires careful review of recorded instruments and coordination with title companies to achieve clarity and marketable title for trust property.
Taking a comprehensive legal approach to a Heggstad petition helps ensure that all relevant documentation and testimony are gathered to present a convincing case to the court. This reduces the risk of a contested hearing, protects beneficiaries’ interests, and supports efficient administration of the trust after a determination is entered. Thorough preparation can also uncover alternative resolutions, streamline negotiations, and minimize surprises during court proceedings. For Marin City clients, careful attention to both legal and factual details improves the likelihood of a favorable and enforceable outcome.
Comprehensive preparation also helps address potential challenges from creditors, heirs, or third parties who may question the transfer. By documenting the settlor’s intent and presenting a complete evidentiary record, petitioners can limit opportunities for delay and reduce litigation costs over time. A careful review of trust documents, recorded instruments, and supporting declarations ensures the court has the context needed to make an order that aligns with the settlor’s planning goals and supports efficient distribution and management of trust assets going forward.
Securing a court order via a Heggstad petition can preserve the settlor’s estate plan by formally recognizing trust ownership despite a missed transfer. This preserves the settlor’s intended distribution scheme and prevents assets from entering probate unnecessarily. A judicial determination provides legal clarity and can be recorded to assist with title issues, facilitating future transactions or distributions. For families seeking continuity and predictability in administration, a successful petition offers the legal finality needed to carry out the trust’s terms with confidence.
Addressing ownership through a formal petition can reduce the administrative burden on trustees and beneficiaries by resolving uncertainties that might otherwise lead to ongoing disputes. Once a court declares an asset to be trust property, trustees can act with authority to manage, sell, or distribute the asset per the trust terms. This reduces the chance of future litigation over the same issue and streamlines settlement, enabling a smoother administration process that benefits all interested parties and helps protect familial relationships during a sensitive time.
Collecting trust documents, deeds, correspondence, escrow instructions, and any drafts or notes related to the intended transfer is essential. Early documentation helps establish the settlor’s intent and can speed the preparation of the petition. Include affidavits or declarations from individuals involved in the transaction and preserve any electronic records that reflect planning decisions. Organizing these materials before filing can reduce delays and make it easier to present a coherent case that shows the court why the asset should be treated as if it had been transferred to the trust.
If the asset is real property subject to mortgages or liens, coordinate with title companies and lenders early in the process. Lenders may have requirements for recognizing trust ownership, and title companies will want documents that support a clear chain of title. Proactive outreach can identify obstacles and potential solutions, and may reduce the need for contentious litigation. Working with counsel to prepare thorough documentation and a clear explanation of the requested court order helps ensure title issues are addressed efficiently once a judicial determination is obtained.
A Heggstad petition is worth considering whenever an intended transfer to a trust was not completed but documentation indicates the settlor intended to include the asset in the trust. It is particularly valuable when avoiding probate is a priority, when title must be clarified for sale or refinancing, or when trustees need clear authority to manage assets. The court’s ruling can reduce uncertainty for beneficiaries and enable timely administration of the trust. Evaluating your situation promptly helps determine whether documentation and cooperation among parties can yield a simple fix or whether a petition is the best course.
Consider a petition also when third parties such as banks, escrow agents, or title companies require a judicial determination before recognizing trust ownership. In these cases, a court order can provide the official recognition needed to complete transactions. Additionally, when competing claims exist or when assets have complex title histories, the clarity of a court decision helps prevent protracted disputes. Timely legal assessment will reveal whether documentary evidence and witness statements support a petition or whether alternative remedies should be pursued to protect the settlor’s intentions.
Typical scenarios include discovering an unrecorded deed, finding bank accounts retained in the settlor’s name, or learning that a critical instrument was never completed before the settlor’s incapacity or death. Other common circumstances involve transfers interrupted by illness, paperwork lost during a move, or miscommunications with title companies or banks. When the settlor’s written plan or contemporaneous notes show an intent to fund the trust, these facts often give rise to a Heggstad petition to align legal title with the established estate plan and avoid probate for the asset.
When a deed intended to transfer property into a trust was never recorded or is missing, heirs and trustees may face uncertainty about ownership. A Heggstad petition can present proof that the settlor intended the property to be trust-held despite the failure to record. Evidence may include draft deeds, escrow communications, or contemporaneous notes. Demonstrating the settlor’s intention and any steps taken toward transfer helps the court determine whether to treat the property as though the transfer had been completed.
Sometimes accounts or investment assets remain titled in the settlor’s name even though trust documents indicate the settlor intended those assets to belong to the trust. A Heggstad petition can seek a declaration treating those assets as trust property and provide the trustee authority to manage or distribute them. Documentation such as beneficiary designations, trust schedules, and correspondence can help establish the settlor’s intent and support the requested relief from the probate court.
If a settlor became incapacitated or died before completing a planned transfer to the trust, a Heggstad petition can be an appropriate remedy to effectuate the settlor’s documented intent. This situation often requires witness declarations, medical records showing timing, and contemporaneous planning documents that demonstrate the settlor’s decision to fund the trust. The court will evaluate the totality of evidence to determine whether to treat the asset as trust property in line with the settlor’s plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides Heggstad petition assistance for clients in Marin City and surrounding Marin County communities. We help identify the right remedy for your circumstances, collect and organize the necessary documents and declarations, and prepare a petition tailored to your case. Our focus is on clear communication, realistic timelines, and diligent preparation so that clients understand the process and what to expect from the probate court. If title clarification is needed to accomplish the settlor’s wishes, we can guide you through each step of the filing process.
Choosing the right legal partner for a Heggstad petition involves working with a firm knowledgeable about California probate procedures and trust administration. Our office brings years of experience helping clients navigate trust-related disputes and title issues, and we focus on preparing persuasive, well-documented petitions that address court concerns. We communicate clearly about costs, expected timelines, and potential outcomes. Our approach balances thorough preparation with practical problem solving to achieve efficient resolutions when possible.
We prioritize gathering strong documentary support and clear witness statements when preparing a petition to present a concise and credible record to the court. Our team coordinates with title companies, lenders, and other parties as needed to address practical obstacles and to clear title for transactions or distributions. For trustees and beneficiaries seeking resolution, we offer careful litigation preparation, mediation efforts where appropriate, and attention to the administrative tasks that follow a court order, ensuring that the trust’s terms can be implemented effectively.
Client service is central to our work; we keep clients informed at each stage of the petition process and provide straightforward explanations of legal options. Whether the situation is resolved through agreement or requires a contested hearing, we provide diligent representation to protect the settlor’s intent and to facilitate the trust’s administration. For Marin City residents, our local focus enables timely filings and responsiveness to court schedules and local title issues that can influence the resolution of trust ownership matters.
Our process begins with an initial review of trust documents, title records, and any correspondence related to the intended transfer. We then identify required evidence, draft the petition and accompanying declarations, and provide guidance on notices to interested parties. If negotiations succeed, we may secure stipulated orders or corrective instruments. If contested, we prepare a trial-ready record and represent clients in court. Post-judgment, we assist with recording orders and implementing trust administration tasks necessary to manage the asset per the court’s ruling and trust terms.
The first step focuses on thoroughly reviewing trust instruments, deeds, title histories, and all communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. We assess whether documentary evidence and witness declarations can support a petition and whether alternative solutions exist. This includes identifying any encumbrances, outstanding mortgages, or lien issues that could affect the requested relief. A careful case assessment determines the most effective route, whether corrective instruments, negotiated resolution, or filing a petition to seek a judicial determination.
Collecting all relevant trust documents, prior wills, deeds, escrow records, and communications is essential to build a persuasive case. We obtain copies of recorded instruments and search title records to clarify ownership histories. We will advise on what declarations or witness statements are likely to be most helpful and coordinate their preparation. Creating a complete evidentiary package early helps streamline the petition drafting process and reduces the chance of surprises later in litigation or court proceedings.
After gathering documents, we evaluate the strength of the evidence and advise whether a Heggstad petition is the best course or whether other remedies could achieve the same result with less cost or delay. We discuss potential outcomes, risks, and timelines, and outline possible negotiation strategies. This evaluation helps clients make informed decisions about proceeding to court, seeking settlement, or pursuing corrective legal instruments to align title with the trust’s intended ownership.
Once the case assessment supports filing, we draft a petition that details the settlor’s intent, the incomplete transfer, and the legal basis for treating the property as trust-owned. The filing package includes supporting declarations, documentary exhibits, and proposed orders for the court’s consideration. We ensure proper service on interested parties and monitor responses. Clear and precise presentation in the petition increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and positions the case for efficient resolution, whether through agreement or hearing.
We prepare declarations from trustees, witnesses, and other individuals who can attest to the settlor’s intent and the steps taken toward transfer. Exhibits such as drafts, correspondence, and title records are organized to tell a coherent factual story. These documents are crucial to persuading the court that the settlor intended trust ownership. Careful drafting ensures that declarations are admissible and effective in presenting a clear record to the judge.
After filing the petition, we manage the service of process on all interested parties and track any responses or opposition. We handle initial court appearances, respond to procedural inquiries, and seek stipulated resolutions when possible. If a contested hearing is necessary, we prepare witness lists and exhibit binders. Throughout, we keep clients informed about court deadlines and strategic considerations to help them understand the likely trajectory of the matter.
Resolution can occur by settlement, stipulated order, or court ruling following a hearing. Once the court issues an order treating the asset as trust property, we assist with recording the order, updating title, and carrying out trust administration tasks consistent with the trust terms. This final phase ensures that the practical steps needed to manage, sell, or distribute the asset are completed and that the trustee has the authority to act without further delay.
After a favorable order, recording the court decree with the county recorder and coordinating with title companies is important to clear title for resale or refinancing. We prepare the necessary documents and work with title professionals to ensure the marketability of the property. Taking these actions promptly helps trustees exercise their duties and facilitates transactions that rely on clear proof of trust ownership.
Following resolution, trustees may need assistance implementing the trust’s terms, distributing proceeds, or adjusting asset allocations. We advise on the administrative steps required, prepare notices to beneficiaries if needed, and help ensure compliance with trust provisions and California law. Proper post-judgment administration helps prevent future disputes and supports an orderly transition of trust assets.
A Heggstad petition asks a California probate court to declare that certain property should be treated as trust property despite the lack of a completed transfer. It is appropriate when documentary or testimonial evidence shows the settlor intended the asset to belong to the trust but administrative steps such as deeds or re-titling were not completed. The petition explains why the court should treat the asset as if it had been transferred, relying on the settlor’s intent and the surrounding facts. This remedy helps carry out the settlor’s estate plan when recordings or transfers were inadvertently omitted. Determining appropriateness requires reviewing trust documents, title records, and any communications or drafts that reflect the settlor’s plan. If evidence shows clear intent and there are no insurmountable title obstacles, a petition is often a practical path to achieve recognition of trust ownership and to avoid probate for that asset. Where parties agree, corrective measures may be possible without court intervention, but a petition provides judicial certainty when disputes or title complexities exist.
Timing for resolving a Heggstad petition varies with the complexity of the case, the court’s schedule, and whether parties oppose the petition. Simple, uncontested matters that proceed by stipulated order may be resolved relatively quickly once the documentation is complete and properly filed. Contested matters can take longer, requiring discovery, hearings, and additional court appearances that extend the timeline. Local court calendars and procedural requirements influence the overall duration, so early case assessment helps estimate likely timeframes. Filing and service timelines, response periods, and the need for further evidence or hearings all contribute to variability. Working proactively to gather evidence, coordinate with title professionals, and communicate with interested parties can shorten delays. We provide clients with realistic timeline estimates based on the specifics of their case and local court practices in Marin County to help plan next steps and anticipate potential scheduling constraints.
The most helpful evidence includes the trust document itself, drafts or unsigned transfer instruments, escrow records, correspondence indicating intent to transfer, and declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor’s actions or heard their instructions. Documentation that shows a consistent plan to fund the trust and actions taken toward that goal strengthens a petition. Title records and any evidence addressing why a deed was not recorded or why an account stayed in the settlor’s name are also important. Affidavits or declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who assisted with planning can clarify the settlor’s intent and timeline. Photocopies of relevant pages from file folders, email or text communications about the intended transfer, and any notes by the settlor indicating instructions to fund the trust all contribute to a persuasive record. Organizing this evidence into a clear narrative helps the court evaluate the claim efficiently.
Yes, in some cases a Heggstad petition can be avoided if all interested parties agree to corrective actions such as executing and recording a corrective deed or filing stipulated court documents. When parties cooperate, a negotiated resolution can be faster and less costly than contested litigation. Title companies and lenders may accept certain corrective instruments once the parties provide sufficient proof of intent, enabling transfers without formal court orders in straightforward situations. However, when disputes arise, title complications exist, or lenders require judicial recognition, a petition may be necessary to obtain definitive legal recognition of trust ownership. The decision to pursue alternative remedies or file a petition depends on the strength of documentation, the willingness of parties to cooperate, and whether a court order will be required to clear title or satisfy third parties involved in the transaction.
Typically trustees, beneficiaries, or other interested parties with a direct stake in the ownership or administration of the trust property have standing to file a Heggstad petition. Trustees often bring petitions to secure authority to manage or distribute assets, while beneficiaries may also seek a judicial determination when ownership questions affect their interests. The probate court will consider whether the petitioner has a lawful interest in the property and whether the requested relief is appropriate under the circumstances. Determining standing can depend on the trust terms, the nature of the asset, and who has been affected by the omitted transfer. In some situations, third parties such as successor trustees or personal representatives may have the necessary standing to seek a court declaration. Early assessment helps clarify who should file and what procedural steps will be required to ensure proper notice to all interested parties.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent probate for the specific asset by obtaining a court declaration that treats the asset as trust property. This outcome helps the trustee manage, sell, or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms rather than through probate administration. However, a petition’s effect depends on the court’s decision and the clarity of the evidence presented. If the court finds in favor of the petition, the asset is typically treated as trust-owned going forward. While a favorable order can prevent probate of that asset, other unrelated assets not included in the trust or transferred improperly may still require probate. Each asset’s circumstances are considered individually, so comprehensive review of the entire estate plan is important to determine whether other actions are needed to avoid probate for additional property.
If interested parties oppose the petition, the matter may proceed to contested hearings where the court evaluates evidence and legal arguments from both sides. Opposition can introduce factual disputes about intent, capacity, or the adequacy of documentation. In contested cases, thorough preparation of declarations, documentary exhibits, and legal briefing is essential to present a persuasive case. Mediation or settlement negotiations may also be effective in resolving disputes before a hearing. The court will weigh the credibility of evidence and testimony to determine whether the petition meets the necessary legal standards. Even when opposition exists, a carefully prepared petition with strong supporting documentation can succeed. Parties should be prepared for possible discovery, motions, and hearings, and should consider strategies to bolster their position while seeking resolution that aligns with the settlor’s plan.
There are costs and procedural risks associated with filing a Heggstad petition, including filing fees, potential attorney fees, and the time required to gather evidence and prepare declarations. If the matter becomes contested, litigation costs can increase. There is also the possibility of an unfavorable court ruling if the evidence is insufficient to show the settlor’s intent. Considering these factors, parties should evaluate whether alternative approaches may achieve the same objectives with lower expense and delay. Despite these considerations, a petition can provide a definitive legal resolution that prevents ongoing disputes and clarifies title for future transactions. Discussing likely costs, timelines, and procedural steps during an initial consultation helps clients make informed choices about whether to proceed and what resources will be necessary to pursue a successful outcome.
A favorable Heggstad order can be recorded to reflect the court’s declaration that property should be treated as trust-owned, which helps clear title for sale, refinancing, or distribution. Recording the judgment or court order with the county recorder provides public notice that the asset is trust property and assists title companies in issuing policies consistent with the court’s decision. This recorded order is an important step in making the asset marketable and removing uncertainties for third parties. If lenders or title companies raise concerns, coordinating with those entities and providing copies of the court order and supporting documentation can resolve lingering issues. The recorded order typically creates the legal foundation for updating title records and transferring ownership in a manner consistent with the trust, allowing trustees to carry out their duties without further delay.
For an initial consultation, bring copies of the trust document, any deeds or title documents, relevant correspondence or drafts showing intent to transfer, and contact information for witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s instructions. Bank statements or account records that reflect the settlor’s efforts to retitle accounts may also be useful. If available, bring notes, emails, or escrow paperwork that demonstrate steps taken toward funding the trust and any reasons the transfer was not completed. Providing a clear chronology of events and any communications about the intended transfer helps the attorney assess whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed. The more documentation and context you can provide at the outset, the more accurate the assessment of options and potential outcomes will be, and the more efficiently the petition preparation process can begin if that route is recommended.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas