If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Mill Valley, a trust modification petition may be the appropriate legal pathway to update terms, correct oversights, or adapt to new family and financial circumstances. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides clear guidance on the process used in Marin County and across California, helping clients understand eligibility, procedural steps, and potential outcomes. This introduction overviews when a petition is necessary, who may file, and how local courts review requests to modify or reform trusts. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss whether a petition fits your situation and to learn next steps.
Trust modification petitions address a range of situations, including drafting errors, changed family circumstances, tax planning needs, and ambiguities in trust language. In Mill Valley and throughout Marin County, petitions are governed by California statutes and local court procedures that require notice to interested parties and clear factual support for requested changes. We explain the documentation typically required, the timeline for court review, and options for resolving disputes through negotiation or hearing. Understanding these fundamentals helps trustees, beneficiaries, and settlors make informed choices about preserving assets and protecting intended distributions under the trust.
A trust modification petition can provide a formal method to align a trust with current wishes, correct mistakes, or resolve ambiguities without dissolving the trust entirely. In Mill Valley, pursuing a petition can protect beneficiaries’ rights, clarify management instructions for trustees, and address unintended tax consequences. Courts may allow modifications where circumstances have changed substantially or where the original terms produce outcomes the settlor did not foresee. By filing a petition, interested parties seek a judicial determination that preserves the settlor’s intent as accurately as possible while maintaining continuity of trust administration and protection of the trust estate.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California from an office in San Jose, helping families and trustees address trust administration and modification matters. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust documents, communication with interested parties, and preparation of clear petitions and supporting declarations for court consideration. We assist with evidence gathering, negotiation, and representation in court when necessary, always focused on practical, durable solutions that reflect the settlor’s wishes. Clients receive straightforward guidance on prospects for modification, potential opposition, and realistic timelines for court proceedings in Marin County.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in probate court asking the judge to change, reform, or clarify one or more provisions of a trust. Common grounds include mistakes in drafting, changes in law or circumstances, or the need to add or remove trustees and beneficiaries. The petitioner must typically demonstrate that modification will better reflect the settlor’s intent or address issues that impede effective administration. Courts evaluate the petition based on statutory standards and evidence, weighing the interests of all beneficiaries and the integrity of the trust as a legal instrument.
Petitions may seek different outcomes, such as reforming language to correct an obvious drafting error, modifying distribution terms because of changed circumstances, or approving a settlement agreement among interested parties. Notice requirements ensure beneficiaries and other stakeholders have an opportunity to object, and hearings allow the court to assess competing claims. It is important to collect documentary evidence, witness declarations, and any communications that support the requested change. Effective petitions present a clear factual narrative tied to the legal standard the court must apply.
A trust modification petition formally asks the California probate court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust. The petition explains the reasons for the requested change, identifies all interested persons, and provides supporting evidence that the court can rely on to determine whether modification is appropriate. Reasons for filing can include ambiguity in trust language, a mistake in execution, changed financial or family circumstances, or a need to correct an unintended tax result. The court’s role is to balance the settlor’s probable intent with the legal framework governing trusts.
A successful petition depends on careful preparation of documents, accurate identification of interested parties, and persuasive factual support. Key elements include a clear petition statement, declarations from those with knowledge of the settlor’s intent, relevant trust documents, and evidence of changed circumstances when applicable. The process typically involves serving notice to beneficiaries, filing the petition in probate court, and attending any scheduled hearings. Opposing parties may file objections, and the court will consider all submissions before issuing an order that implements or denies the requested changes.
Understanding common terms helps trustees, beneficiaries, and settlors navigate modification petitions. This glossary explains phrases you are likely to encounter during the process, including legal standards for reforming a trust, notice and service requirements, and the role of declarations and exhibits. Familiarity with these terms allows interested persons to engage more effectively with counsel, participate in the process, and evaluate whether proposed changes align with the settlor’s intent. Below are clear definitions and practical notes on frequently used terms in trust litigation and administration.
Settlor refers to the person who created and funded the trust originally. The settlor’s expressed intent, as found in trust documents and related communications, is central to petitions seeking modification or reformation. Courts examine evidence of the settlor’s probable intent when determining whether to grant a petition, looking at drafting history, trust provisions, and any other relevant documentation. Understanding who the settlor is and what they intended helps determine whether a proposed change is consistent with the trust’s purpose and original plan for distribution and administration.
Reformation is the legal remedy used to correct written terms of a trust that do not reflect the settlor’s actual intent due to mistake or clerical error. When a petition for reformation is filed, the court evaluates evidence showing that the written instrument deviated from the settlor’s true intentions and that correction is justified. The process requires convincing factual support, often including declarations, drafts, and contextual evidence of how the error occurred. Reformation differs from modification in that it aims to align the document with what the settlor already intended.
The petitioner is the person who files the motion or petition asking the court to grant a change to the trust. Petitioners may include trustees seeking clarification or authority to act, beneficiaries requesting adjustments for changed circumstances, or sometimes the settlor if still living and seeking amendment through court approval. Petitioners must identify all interested parties, provide required notice, and present evidence that supports the requested relief. Accurate identification and representation of interested parties helps prevent procedural defects that could delay the court’s consideration.
An interested party includes anyone with a present or future beneficial interest in the trust, such as beneficiaries, trustees, and sometimes creditors or other parties claiming rights. Notice to interested parties is required for most petitions and gives them an opportunity to oppose, consent, or request additional information. The court considers objections from interested persons and weighs competing claims when deciding whether to allow a modification. Identifying and properly serving all interested parties is fundamental to securing a court order that will withstand later challenges.
When changes to a trust are needed, there are several paths to consider. Informal approaches include trustee-initiated amendments allowed under the trust terms, beneficiary agreements to vary distributions, or nonjudicial settlement agreements when California law permits. A petition to probate court is a judicial option used when parties cannot reach agreement, when formal reformation is required to correct drafting errors, or when the legal basis for modification must be established by the court. Choosing the right path depends on the trust language, the nature of the change, and the willingness of beneficiaries and trustees to cooperate.
Occasionally, all beneficiaries and the trustee agree that a specific change is appropriate and the trust contains provisions allowing nonjudicial settlements or amendments. In such cases, a written agreement signed by all affected parties can resolve issues more quickly and with less expense than a court petition. These agreements must still comply with California law and the trust’s own modification clauses, and they should be carefully documented to reduce the risk of future disputes. An amicable resolution can preserve family relationships while achieving the desired result promptly.
Some trusts grant the settlor or the trustee specific authority to amend or correct provisions without court approval. When the document itself provides a clear and lawful amendment mechanism, using that internal process is often preferable because it avoids the time and cost of litigation. It is important to follow the required formalities precisely and to record any amendments properly. Even when an internal amendment process is available, consider whether notice to beneficiaries or additional documentation is appropriate to prevent later challenges.
When beneficiaries disagree, when trust language is ambiguous, or when there are allegations of mistake or misconduct, filing a petition in probate court may be necessary to obtain a binding resolution. The court can interpret ambiguous terms, reform the trust to reflect the settlor’s probable intent, and enforce duties owed by trustees. In contested situations, representation at hearings and assistance preparing declarations and evidence are important for presenting a persuasive case that addresses the court’s legal standards and procedural expectations.
Certain modifications involve complex legal or tax implications that are not suitable for informal resolution. For example, correcting language that affects tax planning, retirement assets, or irrevocable trust provisions may require court approval to ensure that changes are effective and defensible. In these scenarios, a detailed petition that outlines the legal basis for modification and anticipates potential objections helps the court understand the full context and potential consequences of proposed relief, protecting the trust estate and beneficiaries.
A comprehensive, court-based approach to trust modification provides finality and enforceability that informal agreements may lack. When a judge approves a petition, the resulting order clarifies the trust’s terms and channels administration under the court’s mandate, reducing the risk of future litigation. This approach can be particularly valuable when beneficiary interests conflict or when meaningful public record of the change is needed. A formal order also helps trustees act with confidence, knowing their decisions align with the court’s ruling and legal standards.
Comprehensive petitions also allow for careful presentation of the facts and law, ensuring the court has a full record on which to base its decision. Evidence can be submitted in an organized way, including declarations, documents, and expert commentary when permitted. The court’s review can address disputes over intent, correct drafting errors, and approve settlement agreements, producing a clear path forward for administration. This process can protect beneficiaries’ interests while promoting orderly management of trust assets.
When a court issues an order resolving a trust modification petition, the result is binding on the parties included in the proceeding and generally reduces the risk of renewed disputes. Clear judicial direction helps trustees administer assets according to terms that the court has ratified and reduces uncertainty about future claims. This finality is especially important for trusts funding long-term plans, retirement assets, or complex family arrangements, where ongoing ambiguity could hinder proper management and distribution of resources.
Judicial oversight ensures that modifications are evaluated under established legal standards, protecting both beneficiaries and trustees from unilateral or improper changes. The court assesses fairness, intent, and statutory compliance before approving reforms, which helps maintain fiduciary accountability and protects beneficiaries from decisions that do not reflect the settlor’s likely wishes. This protective role encourages transparent, well-documented resolutions to disputes and provides a neutral forum for resolving contested issues about trust administration and intent.
Collecting and preserving documents and communications that reflect the settlor’s intent can make a significant difference in the strength of a petition. This includes earlier drafts of the trust, letters, emails, notes from meetings, or other records that show why a particular provision was included or how a mistake occurred. When possible, gather witness statements or declarations from individuals who had direct contact with the settlor. Clear documentation reduces ambiguity and supports a persuasive factual narrative for the court to consider during a petition proceeding.
Before or during litigation, consider alternative dispute resolution like mediation to reach a mutually acceptable resolution without extended court proceedings. Mediated agreements can be presented to the court for approval when needed, streamlining the process and reducing costs. If a settlement resolves the parties’ differences, document the agreement carefully and ensure it conforms to statutory requirements. Mediation can preserve relationships among family members while achieving practical solutions, and courts often encourage settlement as a way to efficiently resolve trust disputes.
Consider a petition when trust language produces unintended results, when a settlor’s original instructions cannot be effectuated due to changes in circumstances, or when parties cannot resolve disagreements through negotiation. A court petition can provide a definitive legal remedy for correcting drafting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous provisions, or updating administrative instructions. It is also an option when dealing with retirement accounts, tax consequences, or other complex assets where judicial approval will protect the trust and its beneficiaries against future challenges.
Another reason to seek a petition is to obtain judicial authority for actions that trustees may be reluctant to undertake without court approval, such as changing distribution schemes, investing trust assets differently, or removing and appointing trustees. When trustees or beneficiaries face uncertainty about the legality of a proposed action, securing a court ruling can prevent personal liability and ensure that the trust is administered consistent with the court’s interpretation of the settlor’s intent and applicable law. This is especially valuable in contentious or high-value estates.
Typical circumstances prompting trust modification petitions include drafting errors, ambiguities that produce conflicting interpretations, changed family situations such as divorce or remarriage, and issues arising from the acquisition or disposition of significant assets. Other triggers include tax planning changes, the discovery of additional assets not contemplated in the original trust, or disputes over trustee powers. Recognizing these circumstances early allows interested parties to collect evidence, communicate with each other, and consider whether a petition or an alternate path is preferable.
Drafting errors and ambiguous provisions are among the most frequent reasons for trust modification petitions. Small clerical mistakes, inconsistent numbering, or unclear beneficiary descriptions can create outcomes unintended by the settlor. When such errors materially affect distribution or administration, a petition for reformation can correct the written terms to reflect the settlor’s probable intent. Submitting drafts, communications, and other evidence that show what the settlor meant can help the court find that reformation is appropriate and consistent with the trust’s overall purpose.
Life events like births, deaths, marriages, divorces, or significant changes in financial status can make existing trust provisions outdated or unfair. When circumstances evolve in ways the settlor did not anticipate, beneficiaries or trustees may petition the court to modify terms to better reflect current realities while honoring the general intent of the trust. Courts will examine whether the proposed modification is reasonable and serves the trust’s purpose, taking into account the interests of all beneficiaries and the long-term goals established by the settlor.
When previously unknown assets are discovered or when legal or tax changes affect the administration of a trust, modification may be necessary to ensure proper distribution and management. A petition can clarify how newly identified property should be handled, resolve conflicts over asset categorization, and adjust administrative procedures to comply with updated laws. Courts consider the impact of such discoveries on the fairness and functioning of the trust and may approve changes that preserve the integrity of the settlor’s plan while addressing practical administration needs.
Although based in San Jose, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout Marin County, including Mill Valley, providing counsel on trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We assist trustees, beneficiaries, and settlors with careful review of trust documents, preparation of petitions, and representation in probate court when necessary. Our office helps clients understand local court procedures, notice requirements, and practical strategies for resolving disputes, aiming to secure clear, enforceable outcomes that reflect the settlor’s likely intentions and protect the trust estate.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for attentive, practical legal counsel grounded in a thorough understanding of California probate and trust law. We focus on preparing well-supported petitions, communicating with affected parties, and pursuing resolutions that minimize conflict and expense. Our goal is to secure legally sound outcomes that align with your objectives while keeping you informed at each step. We emphasize clarity in pleadings and careful documentation to help the court and interested persons see the basis for the requested change.
Our team helps clients evaluate whether informal resolution, mediated settlement, or a formal petition is the most efficient and effective approach. By analyzing the trust document, relevant facts, and potential objections, we provide a candid assessment of likely timelines and costs. When litigation becomes necessary, we prepare thorough declarations and exhibits, pursue negotiation where feasible, and represent clients at hearings to advocate for reasonable, legally grounded solutions that promote responsible trust administration.
We also place a strong emphasis on client communication and planning for post-order administration once the court has acted. After a petition is resolved, trustees often need guidance on implementing the court’s order, updating trust records, and notifying institutions that manage trust assets. Our office assists with these practical follow-up steps to help trustees transition to the new directives and to ensure beneficiaries understand how the order affects their interests and distributions going forward.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust and related documents, followed by a fact-finding discussion with the client to identify the specific change sought and any potential opposition. We then collect evidence, prepare a clear petition and supporting declarations, and identify all interested parties for notice. If negotiation or mediation can resolve the matter, we pursue those options; otherwise we file the petition and represent the client at hearings. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines, potential outcomes, and steps for implementing the court’s order after resolution.
The initial step focuses on reviewing the trust, related estate planning documents, and any evidence relevant to the requested change. This includes prior drafts, correspondence, beneficiary designations, and financial records that shed light on intent. We assess whether the trust contains amendment clauses or whether a court petition is required, then develop a strategy tailored to the facts, the likely positions of interested parties, and the applicable law. A careful start helps avoid unnecessary delay and positions the petition for effective presentation.
Collecting documents that support the proposed modification is a critical part of preparing a petition. This may include earlier drafts of the trust, correspondence with the drafter, financial statements, and witness statements. Well-organized evidence helps demonstrate the settlor’s probable intent or the presence of a drafting mistake, and it strengthens the factual narrative presented to the court. We advise clients on the types of records that will be most persuasive and assist in securing declarations from those with first-hand knowledge.
Accurately identifying and notifying all interested parties is essential to the petition process. California probate rules specify who must receive notice and how service should be accomplished. We prepare the required notices, ensure proper service, and document compliance with procedural requirements to minimize the chance of later procedural objections. Proper notice also opens channels for potential resolution and helps frame the court’s understanding of who may be affected by the proposed modification.
After preparing the petition and supporting declarations, we file the documents in the appropriate probate court and provide proof of service to all interested parties. The filing initiates the court process and sets a timeline for responses, potential hearings, and discovery if contested. While the petition is pending, we continue to pursue negotiation or mediation where possible to secure prompt resolution. If disputes persist, we prepare for hearing by organizing testimony and legal arguments that address the court’s standards for modification or reformation.
Filing the petition requires attention to court rules, filing fees, and proper attachments that support the request. Proof of service must demonstrate that all interested parties received notice in the manner required by the probate code. Clear, complete filings reduce the risk of procedural delays and ensure the court has a full record to consider. We handle the administrative steps of filing and provide clients with copies of all submissions and notices so they have a complete record of the proceedings.
Once the petition is filed, parties sometimes engage in negotiation or mediation to reach a mutually acceptable settlement before a contested hearing. These pre-hearing steps can reduce costs and preserve relationships. If mediation is productive, the settlement can be presented to the court for approval where required. When settlement is not possible, we prepare for hearing by organizing evidence, identifying witnesses, and refining legal arguments to address likely objections and help the court reach a reasoned decision.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, we present the petition, supporting declarations, and any agreed-upon settlements to the probate court for determination. The judge will evaluate the evidence, hear objections, and issue an order granting or denying the requested modification, or sometimes a limited remedy. After the court issues its order, we assist with implementing the changes, updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and advising trustees on administration consistent with the order to ensure a smooth transition and compliance with the court’s directives.
At the hearing, the court hears argument and reviews the written record to determine whether the requested modification meets legal standards. This includes assessing evidence of the settlor’s intent, the nature of any mistake, and the potential effect on beneficiaries. The judge may grant the full relief requested, deny the petition, or craft a narrower remedy that addresses specific issues. Effective presentation at hearing aims to make the factual and legal basis for modification clear and persuasive to the court.
Once the court issues an order approving a modification or reformation, trustees must implement the directive and update trust records accordingly. This often involves delivering a copy of the order to financial institutions, amending account titles, and informing beneficiaries about how distributions will be handled. We assist trustees in executing these post-order steps to ensure compliance and to prevent administrative errors. Proper implementation is essential to realize the benefits of the court’s decision and to protect trustees from liability.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court asking the judge to change, clarify, or reform the terms or administration of an existing trust. This petition explains the factual and legal basis for a change, identifies interested persons, and requests a specific order from the court. Typical reasons for filing include correcting drafting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous language, or adapting the trust to changed family or financial circumstances. The petition process provides a binding resolution when informal fixes are not possible or when judicial authority is required. Courts consider petitions under applicable California statutes and case law, evaluating evidence about the settlor’s likely intent and the impact on beneficiaries. The petition must comply with notice and service rules, so interested persons have an opportunity to respond or object. If the court grants the petition, the resulting order directs trustees on how to administer the trust going forward and provides clearer, enforceable terms that reduce the risk of future disputes.
In California, a range of parties may file a petition to modify a trust depending on the circumstances. Trustees can petition the court for clarification or instructions when uncertainty exists about how to administer the trust. Beneficiaries who believe the trust should be reformed to reflect the settlor’s intent or to address mistakes may also file petitions. Occasionally, a living settlor will seek court involvement to confirm changes when direct amendment is impractical or when the trust document lacks an amendment mechanism. Any petitioner must properly identify and notify all interested persons as defined by probate rules. Interested parties typically include current and remainder beneficiaries, surviving spouses, and sometimes creditors depending on the relief sought. Proper notice is essential to prevent procedural defects and to give the court a clear understanding of who may be affected by the requested modification.
Supporting evidence for trust reformation commonly includes prior drafts of the trust, correspondence between the settlor and the drafter, witness declarations, and other documentation that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Declarations from individuals who had personal knowledge of the settlor’s wishes or the circumstances surrounding the trust’s drafting can be persuasive. Financial records, contemporaneous notes, and any documents showing a clerical mistake or oversight may also be helpful in establishing the factual predicate for reformation. The court evaluates the evidence to determine whether the written trust departs from the settlor’s intent due to mistake or other factors warranting reformation. Effective petitions present a coherent factual narrative supported by documentary proof and sworn declarations, explaining how and why the requested correction aligns with the settlor’s probable objectives and the trust’s overall scheme.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, the level of opposition, and local court schedules. Simple, uncontested petitions resolved by written submissions or short hearings may conclude in a few months, while contested matters involving discovery, multiple hearings, or complex factual disputes can take significantly longer. Court calendars and mandatory notice periods also influence timing, so prospective petitioners should plan for potential delays and allow time for meaningful negotiation where appropriate. Engaging counsel early to prepare a thorough petition and to identify procedural requirements can reduce delays. Pursuing mediation or settlement can shorten the timeline substantially when parties are willing to negotiate. However, when serious objections arise and litigation is necessary, the process can extend into many months or longer depending on the scope of contested issues and court availability.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed trust modification. The probate process requires notice to interested parties so they have an opportunity to oppose the petition. Objections may be based on a belief that the proposed change conflicts with the settlor’s intent, unfairly prejudices certain beneficiaries, or is not supported by adequate evidence. When objections are filed, the court will consider the arguments, evidence, and any relevant legal standards before deciding whether to permit the modification. Objections may lead to negotiation, mediation, or a contested hearing where the court evaluates competing claims. Resolving objections often involves careful examination of the trust documents and supporting evidence, and it may require witnesses or documentary proof to establish what the settlor intended. Parties should be prepared to present clear legal and factual positions in response to objections.
Alternatives to filing a court petition include negotiated settlements among interested parties, nonjudicial settlement agreements permitted under California law, and informal amendments when the trust document allows changes without court approval. Mediation is commonly used to facilitate agreements that resolve disputes and can sometimes produce a written settlement for court approval if necessary. When all affected persons consent and the trust terms permit, these approaches can be quicker and less costly than litigation. Using alternative dispute resolution requires careful documentation and attention to legal formalities, especially when dealing with complex assets or retirement accounts. Even when parties reach an agreement, it is often wise to memorialize the resolution in a manner that prevents future challenges, and to seek court approval where required to ensure enforceability and to protect trustees from liability.
A court-approved modification typically becomes part of the trust record and is enforceable as the court’s order directs, but the extent to which it affects the rest of the trust depends on the nature of the order. Courts generally aim to make changes that preserve the trust’s validity and overarching purpose while correcting specific provisions. When reformation is granted, the corrected language is applied as if it had accurately reflected the settlor’s intent, and the remainder of the trust remains in effect unless the order specifies broader changes. Where a court limits its ruling to particular sections, trustees should follow the order’s terms while continuing administration under unaffected provisions. If uncertainty remains about the interplay between the modified and unmodified terms, additional petitions or court guidance may be appropriate to ensure coherent administration and to avoid unintended consequences for beneficiaries.
Notice and service for trust modification petitions must comply with California probate rules, which require identification and formal notification of interested persons. Notice typically involves personal delivery, mail, or other authorized means set by statute, and proof of service must be filed with the court. The purpose of notice is to give beneficiaries and other interested parties an opportunity to respond or object, ensuring the court hears all relevant perspectives before making a decision. Failing to provide adequate notice can result in delays, procedural challenges, or even the setting aside of a court order. Careful attention to statutory notice requirements and timely filing of proof of service helps protect the integrity of the proceeding and reduces the likelihood of later disputes over whether parties received proper notice.
A living settlor may seek court involvement to modify or reform a trust in certain circumstances, particularly when direct amendment is impractical or when the trust lacks an internal amendment mechanism. If the settlor retains the power to revoke or amend the trust under its terms, they can usually make changes without court involvement by following the document’s procedures. However, when third-party interests are implicated or the settlor seeks judicial confirmation for a proposed change, a petition provides a formal record and court approval that may prevent later disputes. When the settlor is incapacitated or when other parties claim the settlor lacked capacity at the time of creating or revising the trust, the court may be asked to evaluate capacity and intent as part of a petition. Courts will assess the evidence presented and balance the settlor’s rights, the trust’s language, and the interests of beneficiaries when determining whether to grant the requested relief.
Costs associated with filing a petition to modify a trust vary based on the petition’s complexity, whether the matter is contested, and local court filing fees. Simple, uncontested petitions may involve relatively modest court costs and attorney fees, while contested matters can incur substantially higher expenses due to discovery, motions, and hearing preparation. Travel, expert declarations when appropriate, and time spent preparing filings also contribute to overall cost. It is important to receive a candid estimate early in the process to plan for potential outcomes and expenses. Pursuing mediation or negotiation can reduce costs compared with full litigation, but parties should weigh the benefits of a faster, less costly resolution against the protection a court order may provide. Our office can provide an assessment of likely costs for a given matter and recommend approaches designed to achieve lawful, durable results while managing fees and resources prudently.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas