A Heggstad Petition is an important tool in California estate matters when assets are in a decedent’s name but were intended to be part of a trust. Residents of Novato and the greater Marin County area may encounter delays or disputes when trust assets remain titled incorrectly after a trustmaker dies. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we help families address these technical title issues and streamline the transfer of assets into the trust. If you are dealing with property that should pass under a trust, a Heggstad Petition can clarify ownership and prevent unnecessary probate delays or administrative complications for beneficiaries and trustees.
Handling a Heggstad Petition involves preparing court filings that demonstrate assets were always intended to belong to a trust and that transfers were merely administrative oversights. For Novato residents, this process can resolve bank, title company, or county recording concerns and allow trustees to manage trust assets promptly. The petition asks a court to declare that assets are already trust property even though paperwork or record titles show otherwise. Timely filing and clear supporting documentation reduce confusion for heirs and fiduciaries, allowing distribution or continued management of assets in accordance with the decedent’s estate plan.
A Heggstad Petition helps confirm that assets should be treated as trust property even when title or account records are inconsistent. This clarification preserves the trustmaker’s intent, avoids unnecessary probate proceedings, and simplifies transfer or management by the successor trustee. For beneficiaries, a successful petition reduces delays and potential disputes, helping to protect the value and intended distribution of estate property. For trustees, it restores clear authority to act on behalf of the trust. In many cases, resolving these technical title issues through a petition avoids more costly and time-consuming litigation or probate administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across Marin County and Silicon Valley, including Novato residents, with a focus on estate planning, trust administration, and related court petitions. We assist clients in preparing accurate filings, gathering supporting evidence, and navigating local court procedures to resolve title discrepancies tied to trusts. Our approach balances practical legal process knowledge with clear communication so trustees and families understand each step. We work to expedite resolution of Heggstad Petitions while keeping clients informed about timelines, documentation needs, and potential outcomes to minimize stress during administration.
A Heggstad Petition is filed in probate court to declare that assets held in the decedent’s name were always part of a trust, despite inconsistent title or record entries. This remedy is commonly used when banks, registrars, or county recorders require court confirmation before allowing a trustee to manage or transfer property. The petition presents evidence such as the trust document, correspondence, account statements, and affidavits to show the trustmaker intended the asset to be trust property. When accepted, the court’s declaration removes barriers to administration and helps trustees carry out the trustmaker’s directions without full probate.
Filing a Heggstad Petition requires careful attention to proof and procedure. Courts examine documentation and the circumstances that led to the asset remaining titled in the decedent’s name. Evidence that supports a petition includes a properly executed trust, beneficiary designations, transfers in contemplation of the trust, and contemporaneous notes or communications. The process can vary by county, and having clear, organized records improves the likelihood of a smooth resolution. For trustees and family members, pursuing a Heggstad Petition is a targeted way to correct administrative errors without undertaking full probate administration.
A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property was intended to be owned by a trust despite being titled in the decedent’s name. The petition establishes that any transfer or omission was an administrative mistake rather than an actual intent to exclude the asset from the trust. By securing a court declaration, trustees obtain authority to manage, transfer, or distribute the asset consistent with the trust’s terms. This remedy is particularly useful for bank accounts, real estate, and other assets where record title does not match the trust’s provisions and where parties seek a streamlined solution.
Successful petitions rely on well-documented evidence and compliance with local probate rules. Typical elements include the trust document, death certificate, account or title records, affidavit testimony from trustees or witnesses, and any prior transfer documents such as pour-over wills or deeds. The process usually involves drafting a petition, serving interested parties, filing proof of service, and presenting the matter to the court with supporting declarations. Courts look for credible proof that the asset was intended to be governed by the trust and that corrective relief is necessary to implement the trustmaker’s plan.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process. Key definitions include trustmaker, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, and declaration of trust ownership. Knowing what each term means and how it applies to your situation eases communication with the court and with fiduciaries. These terms also clarify which documents will strengthen a petition, such as the trust agreement, transfer deeds, and account statements. Familiarity with the terminology enables trustees and family members to gather the right evidence and to follow procedural steps that courts expect in Heggstad Petition matters.
The trustmaker is the person who created the trust and set its terms, while the trustee is the individual or institution appointed to manage the trust assets according to those terms. In Heggstad matters, it is important to show that the trustmaker intended certain assets to be part of the trust and that the trustee now has authority to manage them. Documentation such as the trust instrument, naming the trustee and describing powers and duties, helps establish the intended ownership and supports the petition seeking court confirmation of trust control over the property.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that transfers assets into a trust upon the trustmaker’s death. While it can move assets that remain in the decedent’s name into the trust, a pour-over will alone may not resolve title issues for third-party institutions. A Heggstad Petition can complement a pour-over will by asking the court to recognize that particular assets should already be treated as trust property, enabling trustees to administer or transfer the assets without separate probate proceedings or prolonged administrative obstacles.
Affidavits and declarations are sworn written statements used to provide factual evidence supporting a Heggstad Petition. These documents often come from trustees, witnesses, or financial institutions and describe the circumstances of ownership or transfers. Properly prepared declarations summarize evidence such as account histories or communications showing the trustmaker’s intent. Courts evaluate these statements along with documentary proof, so clear, consistent, and notarized affidavits can be decisive in demonstrating that assets were meant to belong to the trust.
Title and record discrepancies occur when asset ownership records do not reflect the trust arrangement, often because paperwork was not updated or because accounts remained in the decedent’s name. These discrepancies can impede trustee actions such as closing accounts or transferring property. A Heggstad Petition seeks to resolve these discrepancies by having the court declare that the asset was always intended to be trust property. Correcting records after a court declaration allows trustees to proceed with administration consistent with the trustmaker’s wishes.
When titled assets conflict with trust terms, there are different ways to proceed, each with trade-offs. Filing a Heggstad Petition targets title correction through the probate court and tends to be narrower than full probate administration. Probate can be more time consuming and public, while a petition focuses on confirming trust ownership for specific assets. Alternative options may include informal negotiations with banks or title companies, or using other probate petitions depending on the circumstances. Evaluating which path is appropriate hinges on the asset type, the clarity of supporting evidence, and the urgency of administration.
A limited Heggstad Petition is appropriate when documentation strongly indicates the asset was always meant to be trust property but title records were never updated. Examples include bank accounts labeled as payable on death to a trust, real property where a deed was intended but not recorded, or retirement accounts with trust beneficiary designations. In these situations the court can declare the asset trust property based on clear written evidence, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute the asset quickly without broader probate proceedings or contentious litigation, simplifying administration for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
When the issue involves a single account or modest asset that is otherwise undisputed, a Heggstad Petition offers a focused remedy that avoids full probate administration. This approach is often faster and less intrusive, reducing time and expense while preserving privacy for the trust’s beneficiaries. Trustees can obtain court confirmation of ownership and then proceed to manage or transfer the asset as the trust directs. Using the court’s declaratory authority in this limited way prevents unnecessary expansion of court involvement into unrelated estate matters.
A more comprehensive legal approach is warranted when multiple assets have title issues, when ownership is disputed by heirs or third parties, or when there are conflicting beneficiary designations. In such cases, coordinated filings and possible litigation may be required to protect trust administration and the rights of beneficiaries. Resolving broader disputes may involve additional petitions, negotiation with institutions, and careful litigation strategy to preserve estate property and implement the trustmaker’s intentions while managing risks and timelines effectively.
When documentation is sparse or competing claimants challenge the trustmaker’s intent, a comprehensive approach helps assemble evidence, develop legal arguments, and pursue remedies beyond a single declaratory petition. This may include discovery to obtain records, filing additional petitions to address contested matters, or coordinating multiple court actions to protect trust assets. A broader strategy ensures that all legal avenues are considered and that trustees and beneficiaries have a clear plan to address challenges while aiming to preserve the trustmaker’s objectives.
A coordinated approach to resolving trust title issues promotes thorough evidence gathering and consistent legal strategies, which reduce the risk of future challenges. By addressing related matters together, trustees can secure court orders that cover multiple assets, streamline communication with banks and title companies, and establish a clear record of the trustmaker’s intentions. Consolidating efforts can also reduce total time and expense compared to handling each issue separately, and helps protect beneficiaries from fragmented or inconsistent outcomes during administration.
Comprehensive handling also supports long-term administration goals by clarifying authority and recordkeeping for trustees. When multiple assets or parties are involved, resolving questions in a single, organized process prevents subsequent disputes and reduces the likelihood of reopening matters. Trustees benefit from court rulings that confirm powers and duties, enabling efficient management and distribution. For families, this approach minimizes uncertainty during an already sensitive time and helps ensure the trustmaker’s wishes are implemented with appropriate legal safeguards.
A comprehensive process provides trustees and beneficiaries with greater legal certainty about ownership and administrative authority. When courts issue clear declarations covering multiple assets, trustees can proceed with confidence regarding transfers and distributions. This helps avoid later disputes over whether a particular asset should have been included in the trust and reduces the chance of re-litigation. Clarity enables trustees to focus on fulfilling fiduciary duties and beneficiaries to obtain timely access to their distributions according to the trust terms.
By combining related petitions and evidence gathering into a single strategic effort, trustees can reduce repetitive court appearances, duplicate filings, and separate negotiations with institutions. This consolidated approach saves time and resources and simplifies recordkeeping. It also allows for a unified presentation to the court, which can expedite rulings and streamline subsequent administrative tasks. Ultimately, an efficient resolution minimizes stress on families and helps preserve estate resources that would otherwise be consumed by prolonged administrative procedures.
Begin by collecting the trust document, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence showing the asset was intended for the trust. Early organization of evidence reduces delays and strengthens a petition. Consistency between documents and witness statements helps courts reach a clear conclusion. Where possible, obtain copies of transaction histories and any prior communications with institutions that handled the asset. Detailed records allow for a more persuasive presentation to the court and speed administrative resolution for trustees and beneficiaries.
Prepare concise declarations from trustees, witnesses, or family members that describe the circumstances and demonstrate intent to include the asset in the trust. Declarations should align with documentary evidence and avoid speculation. Clear, factual statements about timelines, actions taken by the trustmaker, and any administrative errors help the court understand why a declaration of trust ownership is appropriate. Well-prepared witness statements reduce ambiguity and support a petition that can achieve timely court approval and administrative resolution.
Residents turn to a Heggstad Petition when assets are improperly titled after a trustmaker’s death, and the trustee needs formal authority to manage or transfer those assets. The petition is often faster and less intrusive than full probate, making it suitable for targeted title corrections. It protects the trustmaker’s documented intentions and reduces administrative obstacles that impede distribution. For families seeking privacy and efficiency in trust administration, the petition offers a focused legal remedy so trustees can proceed without unnecessary delays or broad probate proceedings.
A Heggstad Petition is also useful when banks or county recorders demand court confirmation before releasing funds or updating title records. Using the petition, trustees can obtain a judicial declaration that enables institutions to comply with trust terms. This helps protect beneficiaries’ interests and prevents assets from falling into intestacy or prolonged probate processes. In many scenarios, pursuing a petition preserves estate value by avoiding lengthy court administration and provides a clear path for trustees to fulfill their duties in accordance with the trustmaker’s wishes.
Typical circumstances include accounts or deeds left in the decedent’s name because paperwork was not completed, transfers intended but not recorded, or institutions that refuse to accept trust authority without a court order. Other situations arise when a pour-over will exists but institutions demand direct proof of trust ownership. Disputes among heirs or unclear beneficiary designations can also prompt a petition to establish clear title. Identifying the cause of the title discrepancy guides the necessary evidence to present to the court and shapes the petition strategy.
Bank and brokerage accounts often present problems when account names remain in the decedent’s name despite the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Financial institutions may require a court order to transfer or close accounts, especially when beneficiary designations or payable-on-death arrangements do not align with the trust terms. A Heggstad Petition provides the judicial confirmation needed to update records, enabling trustees to access funds and manage investments according to the trust document without full probate administration, which saves time and reduces administrative expenses.
Real property can remain titled in the decedent’s name when a deed intended to convey ownership to a trust was never recorded or executed properly. This creates problems for successor trustees who need to sell, refinance, or manage the property. A Heggstad Petition asks the court to declare the property trust-owned, allowing for corrected records and necessary transactions. Courts weigh the trust document and surrounding evidence to determine intent, and a favorable ruling facilitates trustee actions consistent with the trustmaker’s estate plan.
Retirement accounts and life insurance policies sometimes show beneficiary designations that conflict with trust instructions or show the decedent as owner without a clarified transfer. These conflicts can block distributions or create uncertainty about who receives proceeds. A Heggstad Petition, along with supporting documentation, can persuade a court to confirm that proceeds are subject to the trust terms. This clarification enables trustees to secure and distribute funds as intended and helps prevent competing claims that would delay administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients throughout Novato and Marin County with Heggstad Petitions and related trust administration matters. We handle filings, coordinate with financial institutions and title companies, and prepare the declarations and evidence that courts expect. Our goal is to provide clear guidance on required documents, local court processes, and realistic timelines. For trustees and families in Novato, we aim to reduce administrative burdens and help achieve timely resolution so trust assets can be managed or distributed according to the trustmaker’s wishes.
Choosing a legal team for a Heggstad Petition means selecting a firm familiar with California probate procedures and local court practices in Marin County. We focus on preparing thorough petitions with well-supported declarations and documentation to present a compelling case to the court. Our approach emphasizes clear communication and attention to detail so trustees understand filing requirements, service obligations, and likely outcomes. We prioritize efficient resolution to help trustees act promptly on behalf of the trust and beneficiaries.
We work directly with banks, title companies, and county recorders to obtain necessary records and clarify what each institution requires to update accounts or deeds. This coordination reduces delays and avoids redundant steps. By handling the drafting, filing, and procedural follow-through, we allow trustees to focus on other administrative duties. Throughout the process, we keep clients informed about expected timelines and next steps so they have confidence in how each matter will proceed through the probate system when a petition is required.
Our firm also reviews related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and advance health care directives to ensure all instruments work together during administration. This comprehensive review identifies any gaps or inconsistencies that could affect the petition or subsequent administration. Addressing those issues proactively helps avoid later challenges and supports a smoother transition for trustees and beneficiaries, allowing the trustmaker’s intentions to be honored with minimal disruption and delay.
Our firm follows a structured process to prepare and file a Heggstad Petition, beginning with a document review and evidence gathering phase to identify the records and declarations needed. We then draft the petition and supporting affidavits, serve interested parties in accordance with probate rules, and file required proofs with the court. We monitor local court procedures and respond to any inquiries or oppositions, presenting the case for a clear declaration of trust ownership. Throughout, we communicate progress and next steps to trustees and beneficiaries so they know what to expect.
The initial review identifies which assets are affected, examines the trust document and related instruments, and compiles relevant account statements, deeds, and communications. We assess whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate or if alternative filings are better suited to the situation. The evidence collection phase ensures that supporting documentation is organized and persuasive, which improves the chances of a favorable court determination and reduces the risk of prolonged disputes or additional filings.
We examine the trust instrument, pour-over wills, deeds, account records, beneficiary designations, and any prior transfer documents to determine the best path forward. This assessment includes identifying witnesses or parties who can provide declarations and locating institutional records that corroborate the trustee’s position. Based on this review we develop a petition strategy tailored to the asset type and the local rules for Marin County probate proceedings, ensuring that filings address the specific concerns institutions or the court may raise.
We prepare clear declarations that describe the facts and the trustmaker’s intent, and we compile supporting documents such as account statements, copies of deeds, and correspondence with institutions. Declarations are written to be factual and concise, aligning with documentary proof to help the court understand the context. Properly prepared supporting materials reduce the likelihood of follow-up requests and strengthen the petition’s presentation to the judge reviewing the matter.
Once the petition and supporting materials are ready, we file with the appropriate probate court in Marin County and serve all interested parties according to California rules. Service ensures that heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties have notice and an opportunity to respond. We then monitor court notices, respond to inquiries, and, if necessary, attend hearings. Proper service and adherence to procedural requirements prevent delays and help move the petition toward a court determination confirming trust ownership of the asset.
Serving interested parties involves delivering notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and any entities with potential claims, following statutory timelines and methods. We prepare and file proof of service documents with the court to demonstrate compliance. Proper and timely service is important to avoid challenges to the petition’s validity. We also track deadlines for responses and prepare replies if objections are filed, maintaining organized records to support the petition throughout the court process.
After filing, courts may request additional information or documentation. We handle these inquiries promptly, providing clarifications and supplemental materials as needed. If an interested party objects, we evaluate the basis for the objection and prepare a reasoned response or consider alternative dispute resolution where appropriate. Timely and thorough responses to court requests increase the likelihood of a favorable resolution and help prevent unnecessary continuances or denials that would prolong estate administration.
Following presentation of the petition and supporting evidence, the court may issue an order declaring that the asset is trust property. After receiving the order, trustees can present it to banks, title companies, or other institutions to update records, transfer assets, or take other actions authorized by the trust. We assist with post-order steps, including recording court orders where necessary, coordinating with third parties to effect transfers, and advising trustees on complying with the trust’s distribution provisions once ownership is clarified.
Once a court issues an order confirming trust ownership, trustees use that document to provide institutions with the authority to transfer or administer the asset. We ensure the order is properly formatted for use with banks and title companies, and we coordinate submission of the order along with any required institutional forms. This step often resolves the administrative barriers that originally prevented trustee action and allows the trust to proceed with management or distribution according to its terms.
After the court’s declaration, it may be necessary to record deeds, update account registrations, or submit forms to close or transfer accounts. We help trustees navigate these administrative tasks, ensuring filings with county recorders or financial institutions are completed properly. Finalizing these changes completes the transition of the asset into the trust’s management and reduces the likelihood of future disputes over ownership, preserving the trustmaker’s intentions for beneficiaries and ensuring the trust can be administered smoothly.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust even though record titles or account registrations show the decedent as owner. It is appropriate when a trustee needs clear legal authority to manage or transfer an asset but institutions or title records do not recognize the trust without a court declaration. The petition is tailored to correct specific title discrepancies so trustees can administer assets according to the trust document rather than through full probate. Gathering strong documentary evidence is important before filing. When considering a petition, evaluate whether the asset can be resolved administratively by providing documentation to the institution, or whether a court order will be required. Small or uncontested items may be resolved more quickly, but when institutions refuse to accept trust documentation or when there are competing claims, a petition provides a formal way to secure authority. Consulting with counsel familiar with local probate rules helps determine whether a petition is the most efficient route for your situation.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition in Marin County can vary depending on court scheduling, the complexity of the evidence, and whether interested parties contest the petition. In uncontested cases with clear documentation, it may be possible to obtain a court order within several weeks to a few months after filing and service. When objections arise or additional evidence is required, the process can extend longer and may involve hearings or further discovery. Local court calendars and administrative procedures also influence how quickly petitions are scheduled and resolved. Preparing thorough supporting documentation and ensuring proper service to interested parties helps reduce delays. Prompt responses to court inquiries and timely coordination with institutions that hold the assets can also speed implementation once an order is obtained. Working with counsel who understands Marin County probate practices increases the likelihood of an efficient process and realistic expectations about timing for trustees and family members.
Key documents to support a Heggstad Petition include the trust document showing the trustmaker’s intent, account statements or deeds that identify the asset, the decedent’s death certificate, and any written communications or forms indicating a transfer to the trust. Additional useful items are copies of pour-over wills, beneficiary designations, affidavits from trustees or witnesses describing the trustmaker’s intent, and institutional records that show prior attempts to retitle the asset. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence, the stronger the petition’s presentation to the court. Declarations from trustees or other knowledgeable persons should be factual, specific, and aligned with documentary proof. Obtaining records from banks or title companies that show account histories or communications can be particularly persuasive. Organizing these materials in advance helps prepare a concise petition and reduces the likelihood of follow-up requests from the court for additional proof.
Filing a Heggstad Petition does not necessarily initiate a full probate administration for the entire estate. The petition is a targeted request to resolve title discrepancies for specific assets so they can be treated as trust property. Courts generally consider these petitions as limited proceedings focused on declaratory relief rather than an open probate administration of all estate affairs. That said, the scope of court involvement depends on the asset types and any objections from interested parties, which could expand the proceedings if contested. When the petition is uncontested and documents are clear, the court typically issues a narrow order that addresses exactly which assets are trust property. This allows trustees to proceed without probate for other estate assets. However, if competing claims or unclear documentation arise, additional petitions or probate actions may be necessary, so understanding the likely scope at the outset is helpful for planning.
A trustee may be able to take certain interim administrative actions, such as gathering documents or communicating with institutions, but many financial institutions and title companies require a court order before allowing a trustee to transfer or access disputed assets. Acting without clear legal authority can expose a trustee to personal liability if challenged. Therefore, obtaining a court declaration through a Heggstad Petition is often the prudent step when institutions insist on judicial confirmation before recognizing trustee control of specific assets. While preparing the petition, trustees should document all efforts to resolve the issue administratively and avoid taking substantive actions that could be contested later. Consulting with legal counsel before making transfers or distributions ensures that trustee actions align with legal obligations and reduces the risk of later disputes or personal liability for improper administration.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad Petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule a hearing to resolve disputed facts or legal issues. Objections often focus on whether the evidence sufficiently demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent or whether competing claims exist to the asset. When objections occur, the process can become more adversarial and may require additional evidence, witness testimony, or legal argument to persuade the court that the asset should be declared trust property. Resolving objections may involve negotiation or alternative dispute resolution to reach an agreement without extended litigation. If an agreement is not possible, the court will evaluate the evidence and issue a ruling. Preparing for potential objections by compiling thorough documentation and credible declarations from witnesses strengthens the petition and helps reduce the chance that disputes will derail timely administration.
A pour-over will moves assets into a trust at death but does not always eliminate title or record discrepancies for institutions that require immediate proof of trust ownership. It is a testamentary tool that operates through probate, whereas a Heggstad Petition seeks a court declaration that specific assets were intended to be trust property and need not be administered through full probate. In practical terms, a pour-over will may initiate probate for assets that remain in the decedent’s name, while a petition focuses on correcting titles so trustees can administer the trust without centralized probate for those items. When both instruments exist, they often work together: the pour-over will shows intent to fund the trust, and the petition provides immediate court confirmation for assets whose records do not reflect the trust. The combined use can be an efficient way to honor the trustmaker’s intentions while minimizing probate where a petition is appropriate.
Not all banks and title companies require a court order in every case. Some institutions will accept trust documents, proofs of identity, and notarized forms and update records administratively. Others have stricter internal policies and will only act upon a court order or if certain account criteria are met. The variance depends on institutional practices, the type of asset, and the clarity of supporting documents. Beginning with direct communication to determine the institution’s requirements is an important early step in deciding whether a petition is necessary. When institutions decline administrative correction, a Heggstad Petition provides the judicial authority to compel recognition of trust ownership. Documenting all communications and attempted administrative remedies is useful evidence when a petition is filed, and it may expedite acceptance by demonstrating that the trustee made reasonable efforts to resolve the matter without court intervention.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad Petition include attempting direct administrative correction with banks, title companies, or county recorders by providing trust documents and identity verification. In some cases, informal agreements among heirs or beneficiaries can allow institutions to act without a court order. Small-claims or simplified procedures may also be available for certain account types depending on institutional policies. However, these options depend on cooperation by all parties and the willingness of institutions to accept documentation in lieu of a court order. When administrative paths fail or when competing claims exist, a petition becomes the more reliable route to secure legal authority. Evaluating alternatives early helps determine the likely need for a petition, and keeping records of attempts at resolution can strengthen a case if court action becomes necessary.
To avoid title issues after death, regularly review and update account registrations, deeds, and beneficiary designations to ensure they align with your trust and estate plan. Where possible, retitle assets in the name of the trust during the trustmaker’s lifetime and confirm that banks, brokerage firms, and plan administrators have the correct trust documentation on file. Maintaining an organized estate plan and communicating intentions to successors can reduce the need for court petitions after death. Also keep originals or certified copies of the trust document accessible and inform trustees where to find relevant records. Periodic reviews of estate planning documents, deeds, and account registrations help catch inconsistencies early. Coordinating with professionals to record deeds and retitle accounts during life is the most effective way to prevent post-death title discrepancies that would otherwise require court resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas