At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in Ross and across Marin County navigate Heggstad petitions when assets were omitted from a trust due to a transfer error or oversight. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that omitted property should be treated as part of the trust based on the settlor’s intent and surrounding documentation. We carefully gather deeds, account statements, and trust documents to assemble persuasive support. Throughout the process we keep communication clear and practical, explain likely outcomes and timelines, and pursue an efficient path that honors the client’s estate planning goals while reducing uncertainty.
A Heggstad petition is often the appropriate remedy when title to property was not properly transferred into a trust, yet the settlor intended for the trust to hold the asset. Filing such a petition requires careful factual presentation and legal argument to show the court the settlor’s intent and the circumstances of the omission. We compile documentary evidence, witness statements when available, and a clear factual narrative to support the petition. Our approach focuses on resolving issues with minimum delay, protecting beneficiary interests, and clarifying title so that the trust can function as intended for estate administration and future asset management.
A properly resolved Heggstad petition restores the intended distribution and administration of trust property by aligning legal title with the settlor’s documented wishes. When property is mistakenly left out of a trust, beneficiaries and trustees encounter uncertainty that can delay administration and affect tax or creditor outcomes. A Heggstad petition clarifies ownership, helps avoid future disputes, and streamlines asset management under the trust instrument. By presenting convincing evidence of intent and a clear legal argument, the process can reduce long-term costs and prevent probate issues that might otherwise arise if the omitted asset remained outside trust control.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides trusted guidance to clients across Marin County and the surrounding Bay Area on trust and estate matters, including Heggstad petitions. Our practice emphasizes practical problem solving: reviewing transactional records, documenting settlor intent, and preparing court filings that present clear and persuasive facts. We work with clients, trustees, and other advisors to preserve family objectives and to minimize delay. Communication is a priority; clients receive regular updates and plain-language explanations so they can make informed decisions throughout the legal process in Ross, San Jose and other California communities.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to treat property as if it had been transferred to a trust when, in fact, an intended transfer was not properly completed. Typical scenarios include a deed that failed to record, accounts not retitled, or paperwork omissions that leave assets outside the trust’s formal title. To succeed, a petitioner must assemble credible evidence that the settlor intended the trust to hold the asset, such as simultaneous declarations, beneficiary documents, or transfer-related communications. The process emphasizes factual clarity and reliable documentation so the court can correct the title in a way that aligns legal form with the settlor’s intentions.
Not every omitted transfer requires court involvement, but when title issues create obstacles to trust administration or risk misalignment with estate plans, a Heggstad petition offers a judicial mechanism to fix the record. The court examines the totality of circumstances, including trust language, contemporaneous deeds or transfers, and any statements indicating intent. The proceeding typically involves filing a petition, providing notice to interested parties, and presenting supporting evidence. Timely action and a carefully prepared record increase the likelihood of a favorable result and reduce the potential for contested litigation among beneficiaries or creditors.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that certain property should be considered part of a trust despite the absence of a proper recorded transfer. The petition explains how the settlor intended the transfer to occur and why title does not reflect that intention. Supporting materials commonly include deeds, trust documents, account records, and sworn declarations. The goal is to eliminate title defects that prevent trustees from managing trust assets as intended, thereby avoiding probate for the omitted asset and preserving the trust’s operation for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
Successful petitions present a coherent narrative supported by documents and testimony showing the settlor’s intent to transfer the asset to a trust. Key elements include proof of the settlor’s ownership, contemporaneous evidence of intent, the trust instrument itself, and any missteps that prevented formal transfer. The process typically involves drafting a petition, identifying and notifying interested parties, filing with the probate court, and, if necessary, attending a hearing. Clear organization of records and early identification of potential objections help streamline the court’s review and reduce the chance of contested proceedings.
Understanding common terms helps clients follow the Heggstad petition process and make informed decisions. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, deed, title, and transfer are central to the petition’s foundation. Knowing what each term means in the context of trust administration clarifies roles, responsibilities, and the evidence needed to support a petition. We provide plain-language explanations and practical examples so clients feel confident about the documentation and steps required to align property title with the settlor’s intent.
A settlor is the individual who creates and funds a trust by transferring assets and defining the trust’s terms. In a Heggstad petition, establishing the settlor’s intent is central; evidence of that intent may include the trust document itself, contemporaneous deeds, correspondence, or recorded actions that indicate the settlor intended a particular asset to belong to the trust. Demonstrating what the settlor intended helps the court determine whether an omitted asset should be treated as if it were included in the trust from the time of the settlor’s action.
A trustee is the person or entity charged with managing trust property according to the trust document’s terms for the benefit of designated beneficiaries. In Heggstad matters the trustee may need clear title to manage or distribute an omitted asset. The trustee often participates in petition preparation, provides trust documents and accountings, and may appear in court to explain how recognizing the omitted asset as trust property promotes proper administration consistent with the settlor’s instructions and the trust’s purpose.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity named in a trust to receive benefits or distributions from trust property. Beneficiaries have a direct interest in the resolution of omitted transfer issues, because whether an asset is treated as trust property affects distribution and management. Beneficiaries may receive notice of a Heggstad petition and can raise concerns to the court. Resolving title questions through a petition protects beneficiary rights by clarifying how the trust should operate and preventing future disputes over assets that were intended to be part of the estate plan.
Deeds and title documents establish legal ownership of real property and are often central to Heggstad petitions. If a deed was not properly recorded or an account was not retitled, the trust may not hold formal title, even though the settlor intended it to. The court can examine deeds, title reports, and transfer records to determine whether the property should be treated as trust property. Establishing clear title through the petition can prevent future challenges and ensure trustees can perform their fiduciary duties without uncertainty.
When property is omitted from a trust, clients face choices: attempt an informal correction, file a Heggstad petition, or proceed through probate if no corrective path is available. Informal transfers may work when all parties agree and title can be corrected through nonjudicial means, but such approaches risk future disputes. Probate is often more time-consuming and public. A Heggstad petition offers a judicial fix that aligns title with the settlor’s documented intent and avoids probate for the omitted asset. Choosing the right path depends on the asset type, the strength of supporting evidence, and the potential for contested claims.
A limited correction may suffice when all interested parties, including trustees and beneficiaries, agree the asset should belong to the trust and documentation establishes the settlor’s intent. In such cases, parties can often execute corrective deeds, transfer account titles, or update beneficiary designations without court involvement. To avoid future disputes, it is important to document the agreement, prepare clear transfer paperwork, and record deeds where necessary. Even when parties agree, careful record-keeping helps protect the trust from later challenges and promotes orderly administration.
Administrative corrections are appropriate when the omission resulted from clerical error and supporting documents such as a recorded deed or contemporaneous statements strongly indicate the settlor intended the transfer. When documentation is robust and there is no dispute, retitling accounts or recording the correct deed may resolve the issue without court filings. Even then, coordination among trustees, financial institutions, and title companies is essential to ensure transfers are properly completed and reflected in official records, preventing later ambiguity that could hinder trust administration.
When interested parties disagree or the documentary record is incomplete, a Heggstad petition provides a formal legal path to resolve title disputes. Courts evaluate the settlor’s intent based on the available evidence and can issue an order clarifying ownership. This judicial determination removes ambiguity, prevents future litigation over the omitted asset, and allows trustees to manage trust property with confidence. Engaging the court is appropriate where informal solutions cannot secure unanimous agreement or where documentation alone does not clearly demonstrate a transfer to the trust.
If omitted property remains outside the trust, it may become subject to probate or hinder efficient trust administration. A Heggstad petition can prevent probate of the omitted asset and reduce delays in distribution. The court order clarifying that the property belongs to the trust allows the trustee to proceed with management and distribution consistent with the trust’s terms. Seeking judicial relief early can protect beneficiaries’ interests and help the trustee fulfill fiduciary duties without prolonged uncertainty over asset ownership.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition provides clarity in title, prevents probate for the omitted asset, and preserves the settlor’s intent by aligning legal ownership with the trust’s terms. A formal resolution reduces the potential for future disputes, enables trustees to manage or distribute the asset under trust directives, and protects beneficiary interests. Because the petition results in a court order, it carries authoritative weight that informal agreements may lack, thereby offering long-term certainty for estate administration and asset protection in the trust context.
A comprehensive approach also includes careful evidence gathering, coordination with fiduciaries, and thorough pleadings to present a persuasive case to the court. The process addresses potential objections proactively and documents the basis for the requested relief. With a court’s determination that the property should be treated as trust property, trustees can act with confidence and beneficiaries can rely on a clear legal outcome. This reduces administrative burden, shortens timelines for distribution, and safeguards the trust’s integrity for long-term estate planning objectives.
One significant benefit of the formal petition process is that a court order provides definitive title clarification, which reduces the risk of later challenges by creditors or disputed heirs. By documenting the settlor’s intent and securing judicial recognition, the trust gains stronger legal footing for asset management and distribution. This clarity can reduce legal costs over time by preventing contested claims and streamlining administration, allowing trustees and beneficiaries to focus on the trust’s intended purposes rather than ongoing title uncertainty.
A Heggstad petition protects beneficiary interests by ensuring assets intended for the trust are administered according to the trust document rather than being diverted to probate or other unintended channels. The court’s recognition of the settlor’s intent helps trustees carry out distributions and investment decisions confidently. This protection preserves the settlor’s purposes, supports consistent administration, and provides beneficiaries with a transparent legal foundation for their entitlements under the trust, reducing the likelihood of later disputes over omitted assets.
Begin by assembling all potentially relevant documentation such as deeds, trust instruments, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Early collection of records helps establish a clear chronological narrative and may reveal contemporaneous actions that support inclusion of the asset in the trust. Accurate records also help identify which parties require notice and reduce delays in preparing a petition. Prompt and organized documentation saves time, avoids unnecessary disputes, and strengthens the factual foundation for any corrective filing.
Expect that a Heggstad petition may involve multiple stages, including records gathering, preparing pleadings, providing notice to interested parties, and potential court hearings. Timeframes vary depending on the asset type, the completeness of the record, and whether objections arise. Discuss anticipated steps early so you can plan for possible delays and costs. Preparing strong documentation and identifying likely issues in advance often reduces the need for prolonged litigation and can shorten the timeline from filing to court resolution, providing earlier clarity for trust administration.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an asset that was intended to be held by a trust remains outside formal trust title and that omission impedes administration, risks probate, or creates potential disputes among beneficiaries. If documentary evidence suggests the settlor intended the asset to belong to the trust but a deed was not recorded or an account was not retitled, the petition provides a court-based remedy to correct the record. Acting sooner rather than later helps preserve evidence, limits complications, and provides beneficiaries and trustees with a reliable foundation for trust management.
Another reason to pursue formal relief is when the omitted asset has material value or when its status could affect tax treatment, creditor claims, or distribution plans. A judicial determination that recognizes the asset as trust property reduces the risk of unintended probate and clarifies management authority. When parties cannot reach consensus on a nonjudicial correction or when the facts are contested, seeking the court’s guidance through a Heggstad petition can protect the settlor’s intentions and promote a lasting, enforceable resolution for all interested parties.
Typical circumstances include deeds that were prepared but never recorded, bank or brokerage accounts that were never retitled to the trust, transfers made close in time to trust execution that were not completed, or administrative oversights where paperwork was incomplete. These scenarios create title defects that may prevent trustees from managing assets as intended. Identifying the specific cause of the omission and documenting contemporaneous evidence is essential for building a persuasive petition that the court can rely on to correct the record.
An unrecorded deed or a deed that was not properly transferred into the trust often necessitates a Heggstad petition. Even when intent is clear, the absence of recorded title can prevent trustees from exercising control or distributing property under the trust’s terms. The petition explains to the court why the deed should be treated as effective for trust purposes, supported by evidence such as draft deeds, signing records, or related documentation indicating the settlor’s intent to include the property in the trust.
Financial accounts, retirement accounts, or investment holdings that were intended to be placed in a trust but not retitled can create serious administrative hurdles. If the settlor took steps indicating an intent to fund the trust but the account title was never changed, a Heggstad petition can provide judicial relief to treat the account as trust property. Effective petitions rely on clear records, such as beneficiary designations, correspondence with financial institutions, and the trust agreement itself to demonstrate the settlor’s objective.
Clerical errors, such as incomplete documentation, missed signatures, or misfiled deeds, commonly result in assets remaining outside the trust. A Heggstad petition addresses these errors by presenting the full factual context and evidence of the settlor’s intent to include the property in the trust. Courts evaluate the surrounding circumstances and supporting documentation to determine whether it is appropriate to treat the asset as if it had been transferred at the time of the settlor’s original action.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is available to assist clients in Ross and nearby communities with the full range of Heggstad petition tasks, from initial review to final court orders. We provide guidance on document collection, evaluate the strength of available evidence, prepare clear petitions, and coordinate service and notice to interested parties. Our goal is to resolve title discrepancies efficiently and professionally so trusts operate as intended. Clients receive practical advice about likely steps, timelines, and options suited to their circumstances.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for measured, practical guidance on trust-related title matters because we focus on thorough preparation, clear communication, and resolving issues with minimal disruption. We assess documentary evidence, recommend the most efficient route—informal correction when feasible or a Heggstad petition when needed—and prepare filings that present a persuasive and organized case to the court. Our approach aims to protect beneficiary interests, clarify title, and preserve the settlor’s intentions while avoiding unnecessary delay.
We collaborate with trustees, beneficiaries, title companies, and financial institutions to gather necessary records and execute corrective steps quickly. When litigation is necessary, we prepare pleadings and supporting declarations that make the factual basis for relief clear to the court. By anticipating potential objections and preparing thorough documentation, we seek to shorten proceedings and achieve enforceable outcomes. Our clients appreciate straightforward explanations of the process, realistic timelines, and ongoing updates as matters progress toward resolution.
Practical planning and attention to detail reduce later complications. We recommend documenting corrective steps after a petition is resolved to prevent recurrence and to ensure trust records are current. Whether the matter requires administrative fixes or a formal petition, we provide clients with options, anticipated outcomes, and clear next steps. Our priority is restoring the trust’s intended operation so trustees can act and beneficiaries can receive their intended benefits with legal certainty.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to gather trust documents, deeds, account records, and any other materials that show the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. We review the facts, advise on whether a nonjudicial correction is feasible, and, if a petition is appropriate, prepare the necessary pleadings, identify interested parties, and file with the probate court. We handle service and responses, negotiate where possible, and present the petition to the court with clear supporting evidence so title can be corrected and the trust can function as intended.
The first step is a thorough evaluation of the available documentation and facts surrounding the omitted transfer. We request trust agreements, deeds, account statements, and any contemporaneous communications. This review determines whether the evidence likely supports treating the asset as trust property and whether nonjudicial correction is feasible. We also identify interested parties who must be notified and prepare a plan for record gathering and petition drafting tailored to the specific issues presented by the asset type and the completeness of the record.
We examine the trust document, deeds, title reports, and any transfer-related records to identify proof of the settlor’s intent. This review looks for signatures, dates, contemporaneous deeds, and communications that link the asset to the trust. Establishing a strong factual record at the outset increases the prospect of a favorable court determination and supports streamlined petition preparation. Clear, organized documentation forms the backbone of a persuasive presentation to the court and reduces the risk of unexpected evidentiary gaps during the proceeding.
Early identification of trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties is essential to satisfy notice rules and to minimize later procedural challenges. We prepare a notice plan, ensuring all potentially affected parties receive appropriate information about the petition and an opportunity to be heard. Proper notice reduces the likelihood of procedural objections and helps the court move efficiently through the matter. We also consider whether settlement or agreement among parties could resolve the issue without hearing, while preserving the option of a formal petition when necessary.
If a petition is warranted, we prepare a carefully drafted petition that lays out the factual basis for treating the asset as trust property, attaches supporting documentation, and requests court relief tailored to the situation. The filing includes declarations or affidavits that explain the settlor’s actions, copies of trust documents, and any other proof demonstrating intent. After filing, we arrange for service and handle responses from interested parties while monitoring court deadlines and following local probate court procedures specific to Marin County and the jurisdiction where the property is located.
We draft pleadings that present a clear timeline, identify legal and factual support for the requested relief, and attach exhibits such as deeds, trust documents, and correspondence. Supporting declarations explain how the documents and facts demonstrate the settlor’s intent. Concise and well-organized pleadings help the court understand the case without excessive delay. Preparing robust supporting declarations is especially important where records are incomplete and the court must rely on a persuasive narrative linking available evidence to the relief sought.
After filing the petition, proper service to interested parties is a critical procedural step, and we ensure all notice requirements are satisfied. If objections arise, we analyze the issues and seek prompt resolution through negotiation or supplemental filings. When hearings are necessary, we present the facts and respond to challenges with targeted evidence. Prompt responses to objections and strategic settlement discussions often shorten proceedings and lead to a clear court order that aligns title with the settlor’s documented intentions.
Once the court reviews the petition and supporting record, it may issue an order recognizing the omitted property as trust property, clarify title, and direct any necessary record changes. After the order, we work with title companies, county recorders, and financial institutions to implement the court’s instructions, record deeds if appropriate, and update account titles. This final step ensures the trust can manage and distribute the asset according to its terms, closing the administrative loop and reducing the risk of future disputes over the property’s status.
After obtaining a court order, it is important to promptly update records, including recording any corrected deed or notifying financial institutions so accounts reflect trust ownership. We coordinate with title companies and recorders to ensure compliance with the court’s directives. Proper implementation avoids lingering ambiguity and provides clear documentary evidence of the asset’s trust status. Taking these administrative steps completes the legal process and permits trustees to manage or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust’s provisions.
Following court recognition of the asset as trust property, trustees often require guidance on administration, distribution timing, and record keeping. We provide practical advice on how to incorporate the asset into trust accounting and distribution plans, recommend updated documentation for trust files, and advise beneficiaries on how the order affects their interests. This post-order assistance helps ensure the trust functions smoothly and that all parties understand their rights and responsibilities under the corrected title arrangement.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to treat an omitted asset as if it had been transferred to a trust, based on evidence that the settlor intended the trust to hold the property. This remedy is used when title defects—such as unrecorded deeds or accounts not retitled—prevent trustees from managing or distributing assets according to the trust instrument. The petition lays out the facts, attaches supporting documents, and requests that the court clarify ownership consistent with the settlor’s intent. The court evaluates the totality of circumstances, including trust language, contemporaneous documents, and any statements or conduct showing the settlor’s intent. When proof is persuasive, the court may issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property, which helps avoid probate for that item and allows the trustee to proceed with administration. The specific requirements and evidence can vary by jurisdiction, so careful documentation and legal presentation are important.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies with the case complexity, the completeness of documentation, whether interested parties object, and local court schedules. In straightforward, uncontested matters with clear supporting records, the process can resolve in a few months after filing, including time for notice and potential hearings. When disputes arise or additional evidence is required, proceedings can take longer, sometimes extending many months until the court reaches a decision. Early preparation and thorough documentation often shorten the timeline. Identifying and notifying interested parties promptly, preparing persuasive declarations, and addressing potential objections in advance can reduce delays. Courts also differ in scheduling and local practice, so working with counsel familiar with the relevant probate department helps set realistic expectations and manage procedural steps efficiently.
Evidence typically includes the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, contemporaneous receipts, and any written or recorded statements reflecting the settlor’s intent to transfer the asset to the trust. Affidavits or declarations from individuals with firsthand knowledge of the settlor’s actions can help fill gaps when documents are incomplete. The court focuses on whether the available evidence reasonably demonstrates that the settlor intended the trust to hold the asset. Organizing records into a clear chronological narrative makes it easier for the court to assess intent. Even when direct documentation is limited, associated records such as tax filings, correspondence with advisors, or draft transfer documents can support a persuasive case. The goal is to present a coherent story backed by credible documentation that the court can rely on when issuing an order.
Yes, in some situations an omission can be corrected without court intervention if all interested parties agree and the necessary documentation supports a straightforward administrative correction. For example, parties might execute a corrective deed, retitle accounts, or update beneficiary designations when no one disputes the settlor’s intent. Documenting these steps carefully helps avoid future challenges and can achieve the same practical result as a court order without the time and expense of litigation. However, when parties cannot agree, evidence is unclear, or a third party such as a title company or financial institution requires judicial clarification, a Heggstad petition provides the authoritative resolution needed to correct title. In contested situations or where official records must be altered in compliance with court directives, the petition is often the most reliable path to finalizing ownership under the trust.
Notice requirements vary by jurisdiction, but generally trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, and any known creditors or other parties with potential interests in the property must be notified of the petition. Proper notice ensures affected parties have the opportunity to respond or object, and it helps the court determine whether to issue relief. Identifying all interested parties early reduces procedural complications and the chance of challenges based on insufficient notice. Working with counsel to compile a comprehensive list of notice recipients is important. Notices must typically be served in a prescribed manner and within required timeframes. Failure to follow notice rules can lead to delays or the need to reissue service, so careful attention to procedural detail is essential to advance the petition efficiently through the court system.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not automatically cause beneficiaries to contest the trust. Many petitions proceed without opposition when the evidence is clear and beneficiaries understand the goal is to honor the settlor’s documented intent. Transparent communication and providing interested parties with an opportunity to review supporting documentation often prevent disputes and promote cooperative resolution. Nonetheless, beneficiaries have the right to object if they believe the evidence does not support the requested relief or if other issues exist. Preparing a thorough factual record and addressing potential concerns proactively reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings. When disagreements occur, the court will weigh the evidence and issue an order that seeks to resolve the matter consistent with applicable law and the settlor’s intentions.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent an omitted asset from being subject to probate by having the court recognize it as trust property, thereby allowing the trustee to manage or distribute it under the trust’s terms. This outcome aligns the asset’s legal status with the settlor’s estate plan and can avoid the time, costs, and public nature of probate for that particular property. The petition is a tool for preserving the trust’s operation and reducing the need for probate where the settlor intended otherwise. If no petition is filed and title remains outside the trust, the asset may be subject to probate administration depending on the settlor’s remaining estate plan. Therefore, timely review and action are important when omitted transfers are discovered, as correcting title through a petition can protect beneficiaries’ rights and maintain the trusts intended administration without resorting to probate for the omitted item.
Common objections include challenges to the sufficiency of evidence showing settlor intent, claims that the settlor changed their intentions, or assertions that procedural notice was inadequate. Opponents may argue that documentary gaps or ambiguous facts do not justify treating the asset as trust property. The court will consider these objections in light of the totality of evidence and applicable law when deciding whether to grant relief. Addressing common objections requires careful preparation: gathering corroborating documentation, presenting a clear factual narrative, and demonstrating compliance with procedural notice requirements. When possible, resolving disputes through dialogue and supplemental evidence reduces the need for prolonged hearings, while a well-supported petition stands the best chance of overcoming objections at court.
Costs vary based on case complexity, the amount of document preparation required, whether contested hearings are necessary, and local filing fees. In straightforward, uncontested matters, costs are generally limited to document assembly, filing fees, and legal preparation. When disputes arise or additional hearings are necessary, costs increase to account for litigation time and court appearances. It is important to discuss anticipated costs early so you can plan and make informed decisions about proceeding. Because outcomes can prevent future probate or disputed litigation, the cost of a properly prepared petition may be modest compared with the potential expenses and delays of unresolved title issues. We provide transparent guidance about expected fees and steps that can help manage costs while working toward a durable legal resolution for the omitted asset.
If an omission is discovered after the settlor’s death, promptly gather all trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any supporting paperwork that indicates the settlor’s intent. Notify the trustee and beneficiaries of the issue and consult counsel to assess whether an administrative correction is possible or whether a Heggstad petition is needed. Early action helps preserve evidence and reduces the risk of disputes or further complications in estate administration. If litigation is necessary, counsel will prepare a petition that sets out the factual basis and supporting documents for the court to consider. Prompt filing, accurate notice to interested parties, and thorough supporting declarations increase the likelihood of a timely court order that aligns title with the trust and allows trustees to carry out their duties without extended uncertainty.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas