A Heggstad petition is a legal action used in California to confirm that assets titled in a decedent’s name were intended to be part of a living trust. If a loved one passed away and certain property never transferred into the trust before death, families can face delays and confusion. This guide explains how a Heggstad petition works in Marin County and outlines practical steps to resolve property title issues. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Sleepy Hollow and beyond, helping families determine whether a petition to the probate court is the right approach to preserve trust administration and reduce delay.
Many families discover funding issues only after a trustee begins administration of a trust. When bank accounts, real estate, or other assets remain in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition provides a pathway to have those items treated as trust property without formal probate. This overview clarifies eligibility, likely outcomes, and typical timelines for petitions filed in Marin County courts. Our office assists clients by gathering documentation, preparing the petition, and presenting evidence that shows the property was intended to be trust property so the court can enter the necessary orders for clear title and smooth trust administration.
A Heggstad petition can prevent the expense and delay of probate by asking the court to recognize assets as trust property based on decedent intent and surrounding evidence. This remedy helps trustees gain clear authority to manage, sell, or distribute assets held in the decedent’s name, aligning actual administration with the settlor’s plan. Benefits include streamlined transfer of property, protection of beneficiary interests, and a judicial determination that reduces future title disputes. For families in Sleepy Hollow and Marin County, a properly prepared petition reduces uncertainty and promotes smoother trust settlement while preserving the overall goals of the estate plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents clients throughout California with a focus on estate planning and trust-related resolutions, including Heggstad petitions. We guide trustees and beneficiaries through document review, evidence collection, and court filings, tailoring each case to local Marin County procedures. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical problem solving, and diligent preparation of court materials. Clients receive hands-on assistance gathering trust documents, bank statements, deeds, and witness declarations needed to support a petition. We aim to reduce delay and help families resolve asset title issues efficiently while protecting fiduciary duties and beneficiary rights.
A Heggstad petition asks a California court to treat property that remained in a decedent’s name as though it had been properly transferred to a living trust before death. Courts evaluate whether the settlor’s intent, declarations, or surrounding circumstances demonstrate that the asset belonged to the trust. This remedy is commonly used for deeds, bank accounts, retirement accounts, and other titled assets that were overlooked during funding. Understanding eligibility, the kinds of evidence typically accepted, and the potential outcomes helps trustees and beneficiaries plan next steps and avoid unnecessary probate proceedings in Marin County.
Timing and prompt action matter: when an asset appears outside the trust, delays can create complications for administration and title transfer. The Heggstad petition process typically requires assembling original trust documents, deeds, beneficiary designations, canceled checks, and statements or declarations illustrating the settlor’s intent. Courts may require testimony or sworn declarations to corroborate documentary evidence. While each case differs, understanding common evidentiary examples and local court practice helps trustees prepare a persuasive petition to achieve a clear order recognizing the asset as trust property.
At its core, a Heggstad petition requests that the probate court declare certain assets to have belonged to the decedent’s trust at the time of death, even if the legal title remained in the decedent’s name. The petition sets out facts and evidence showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust and explains why the asset should be administered under the trust rather than through probate. A favorable court order clarifies title and provides trustees with authority to transfer, sell, or distribute the asset consistent with trust terms, avoiding a longer probate process and protecting beneficiary expectations.
Successful petitions usually hinge on clear documentation and credible supporting evidence. Important elements include the original trust instrument, any amendments, deeds, account statements, canceled checks showing trust-related transactions, and witness declarations about the settlor’s intent. The legal process involves drafting the petition, filing with the probate court in the county where the decedent resided, serving interested parties, and attending any necessary hearing where the court evaluates the evidence. The judge may issue an order confirming that the asset is trust property, allowing trustees to proceed with administration without resorting to full probate for that asset.
Understanding terminology helps clients navigate Heggstad petitions and trust administration. Common terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, funding, and certification of trust. Each plays a role in how a court views property intended for a trust. Clear definitions remove confusion and help families gather appropriate documentation. This glossary covers terms commonly encountered when a petition is needed to treat assets as trust property, and explains how those terms relate to the process of confirming title, avoiding probate where possible, and preserving the settlor’s intent during trust settlement in California.
A Heggstad petition is a specific legal action filed in California probate court asking the judge to declare that certain assets were meant to be held by a decedent’s trust, even though the assets remained titled in the decedent’s name at death. The petition outlines the factual and documentary basis for that conclusion and requests an order recognizing the asset as trust property. The remedy helps trustees obtain clear title for administration, sale, or distribution without full probate for those assets when evidence supports the settlor’s intent to fund the trust.
A pour-over will is a document that directs any assets still in the decedent’s name at death to be transferred into the decedent’s trust. It acts as a backup to capture assets unintentionally left outside the trust. While a pour-over will may channel assets into the trust, assets passing under a will ordinarily require probate. A Heggstad petition can be used in conjunction with a pour-over will to show intent that certain assets belonged to the trust, potentially reducing probate for those items when supported by appropriate evidence.
A certification of trust is a summarized document that provides essential information about a trust—such as the trustee’s authority and the existence of the trust—without revealing the trust’s full terms. It is often used to provide third parties like banks or title companies with proof of authority to act on behalf of the trust. When assets are disputed, a certification of trust can support a trustee’s claim that property should be treated as trust property, and the document may be submitted with a Heggstad petition as part of the evidentiary package.
Funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a living trust so the trust controls those assets during administration and distribution. Examples include retitling real estate into the trust’s name, updating account ownership, and assigning assets like retirement accounts according to trust terms. Failure to fund certain assets prior to death can result in administrative or probate complications. A Heggstad petition addresses funding oversights by asking a court to recognize that an asset was intended to be part of the trust despite remaining titled in the decedent’s name.
When an asset remains in a decedent’s name, families can consider several paths: probate, informal resolution with title companies, or filing a Heggstad petition. Probate is often lengthier and more costly, while direct negotiation with financial institutions may succeed for some accounts. A Heggstad petition provides a formal judicial route to confirm trust ownership and may be appropriate when institutions require a court order or when heirs dispute the asset’s status. Evaluating local court timelines, the strength of documentary evidence, and the presence of interested parties helps determine the best approach for individual cases in Marin County.
Some financial institutions will correct account ownership when presented with a certification of trust, a death certificate, and a copy of the will or trust. If the institution’s internal policies and the documentation are clear, the account can often be retitled without court involvement. This limited approach can be a quick and cost-effective way to resolve funding oversights when no competing claims exist. Trustees should carefully follow the institution’s requirements and maintain complete records of communications and submitted documents to prevent later disputes.
When the asset value is modest and all beneficiaries agree on how the property should be treated, parties may prefer informal resolution to avoid court costs and delay. Simple transfers or releases executed by an institution or a signed stipulation among heirs can be sufficient. However, this path depends on cooperative heirs and clear evidence of the settlor’s intent. If later challenged, informal resolutions may lack the finality that a court order provides, so parties should weigh the benefits of expediency against the desire for long-term certainty.
A Heggstad petition should be considered when institutions refuse to retitle assets without a court order or when there are competing claims from heirs or creditors. In those situations, the petition brings the matter before a judge to evaluate the evidence and issue a binding order. This formal approach provides stronger legal clearance for trustees and helps prevent future disputes by establishing a record of the determination. Preparing a compelling petition, supported by solid documentation and affidavits, increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling in Marin County courts.
Real estate and complex asset holdings often require detailed review of deeds, title histories, and related records. When property has liens, multiple owners, or unclear transfer history, a court order can clarify rights and allow trustees to proceed with sale or distribution. A thorough legal approach helps identify all necessary parties to serve, address potential objections, and assemble the precise documentary evidence courts expect. This level of care helps ensure clean title and reduces the risk of post-distribution challenges that could disrupt the settlor’s intended plan.
A formal petition provides a judicial declaration that an asset belonged to the trust, giving trustees clear legal authority to act. This reduces the chance of post-settlement disputes and gives title companies and buyers confidence when transferring real property. A comprehensive approach also helps ensure that all interested parties are properly notified and that any objections are resolved through the court process. In Marin County, where property values and stakes can be significant, a court-backed resolution often provides long-term clarity and helps trustees fulfill their duties with reduced risk of later challenges.
Beyond immediate title resolution, a Heggstad petition can preserve the settlor’s intent and minimize administrative complications. It prevents ad hoc solutions that may leave unresolved questions and fosters a documented record of the court’s findings. This outcome benefits trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties involved in transactions by establishing a clear legal foundation for transfers. Although court proceedings involve time and expense, the resulting certainty often outweighs those costs for significant assets or contested cases, protecting the trust administration process over the long term.
When a court declares that certain property belongs to a trust, title companies and potential buyers gain confidence to proceed with sales or transfers. The court order serves as authoritative evidence of ownership, reducing the likelihood that a third party will later challenge the transfer. For transactions involving real estate or high-value assets, this assurance can be essential to completing sales, refinancing, or distributions to beneficiaries. Trustees who seek clear title through court process reduce downstream legal friction and ensure smoother administration of trust assets.
A judicial determination provides finality that informal resolutions rarely achieve. With an order recognizing assets as trust property, trustees and beneficiaries obtain a documented ruling that discourages later challenges by heirs or creditors. This finality is especially valuable when the estate involves multiple beneficiaries, blended families, or complex holdings where disputes are more likely. While court involvement requires careful preparation, the resulting peace of mind and legal protection often make a Heggstad petition the preferable route for preserving the settlor’s intent and concluding administration with confidence.
Start by collecting the original trust document, any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, canceled checks, and correspondence that reflect the settlor’s intent. Documentation showing payments, trust-managed expenses, or transfers intended for the trust strengthens a petition. Also assemble death certificates and any prior probate or trust administration filings. Early organization helps streamline the petition process, reduces delays caused by missing records, and provides a clearer picture for the court when determining whether the asset should be treated as trust property.
Declarations from the trustee, witnesses, or third parties can corroborate documentary evidence and explain circumstances showing the settlor intended the asset for the trust. These signed statements should be detailed, referencing dates, transactions, and conversations where appropriate. Clear, organized declarations help the court assess credibility and motive without requiring extensive testimony. Well-crafted declarations paired with primary documents like deeds and bank records increase the chance of a favorable ruling and shorten the time needed for hearings and adjudication.
You might consider a Heggstad petition when assets appear outside a trust at death and transferring them informally is not possible, or when the institution holding the asset demands a court order. Other reasons include preventing probate for particular assets, providing legal clarity for title transfers, and resolving disputes among beneficiaries about whether property belonged to the trust. The petition can be particularly helpful for real estate left in the decedent’s name, accounts that institutions will not retitle without a court order, or situations where a pour-over will alone would still require probate administration.
Filing a Heggstad petition also protects trustees by creating a judicial record that supports their actions in administering and distributing trust property. This protection can be valuable when trustees need to sell or refinance real property, distribute assets to beneficiaries, or defend against later claims about improper handling. For families seeking to honor the settlor’s intent while minimizing administrative delay and cost, a Heggstad petition offers a balanced, legally recognized route to align title with the trust and achieve orderly administration.
Typical scenarios include discovered deeds that remained in the decedent’s personal name, bank accounts or brokerage accounts not retitled into the trust, and retirement accounts with unclear beneficiary designations. Additional situations involve transfers that were started but not completed before death, errors in title transfers, and instances where a financial institution refuses to honor trust authority without a court order. Each circumstance requires careful fact gathering to show that the asset was intended for the trust and that court recognition is appropriate for clear administration.
Real property can be particularly problematic when the deed was never re-titled into the trust. Buyers, lenders, and title companies often require a clear judicial determination before accepting transfers. A Heggstad petition provides the court’s ruling that the property should be handled under the trust, allowing trustees to sell or distribute the property without full probate. The petition typically includes the trust instrument, deed history, and supporting declarations showing the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust.
Financial accounts that remain in the decedent’s name can freeze access and complicate administration. Banks and brokerage firms may accept a certification of trust or other documentation, but sometimes they require a court order to release funds or retitle accounts. Filing a Heggstad petition can secure the authority to manage or transfer these accounts under trust terms. Gathering statements, beneficiary designations, and records of trust-related transactions helps demonstrate the settlor’s intent and supports the petition to obtain the court’s ruling.
When heirs disagree or a financial institution refuses to recognize a trustee’s authority, the trustee may need a judicial determination to move forward. Competing claims can stall administration and cause friction among beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition brings the issue before the court for a formal resolution, requiring proper notice to interested parties and giving the judge the opportunity to weigh documentary and testimonial evidence. The resulting order reduces future litigation risk and clarifies the trustee’s authority to proceed under the trust instrument.
If you are dealing with assets left outside a trust in Sleepy Hollow, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help evaluate your options and pursue appropriate resolution. We work with trustees and beneficiaries to review trust documents, assemble evidence of the settlor’s intent, and prepare the petition for filing in the proper Marin County court. Our goal is to obtain a clear judicial determination that enables trustees to manage, sell, or distribute property without unnecessary delay while preserving the settlor’s plan and protecting beneficiary interests.
Clients rely on our firm for careful case assessment, thorough document preparation, and attentive client communication. We prioritize understanding the family’s objectives and assembling the strongest possible evidentiary record to support a petition. This includes locating deeds, gathering bank statements, drafting declarations, and addressing any procedural issues needed for successful filings in Marin County. Clear, complete filings improve the odds of a smooth hearing and help trustees achieve finality for title and administration matters.
Our team takes a pragmatic approach to each matter, weighing the costs and benefits of informal resolution versus court action. When a Heggstad petition is the best option, we focus on efficient preparation and responsive handling of court deadlines and service requirements. For uncontested matters where institutions will cooperate, we pursue the least costly path. When formal action is required, we prepare robust petitions and supporting declarations designed to present a compelling factual record to the court.
Throughout the process, we emphasize open client communication, clear timelines, and practical guidance for trustees and beneficiaries. Our goal is to minimize stress during administration and to provide a legally sound path to resolve funding oversights. Clients in Sleepy Hollow and across Marin County benefit from an approach that seeks lasting resolution, balancing legal strategy with the family’s needs and the trust’s provisions to achieve orderly administration.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to review the trust, deeds, account records, and any wills or related documents. We identify the assets in question and map out the evidence needed to show the settlor’s intent to place those assets in the trust. Once we assemble the documentation and prepare declarations, we draft the petition and file it in the appropriate Marin County probate court, handle service to interested parties, and represent the trustee at any hearing. We keep clients informed at each step to reduce uncertainty and ensure the matter moves forward efficiently toward resolution.
The initial phase focuses on assessing whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed by collecting and reviewing the trust, deeds, account records, and other relevant documents. We request originals or certified copies when available, identify witnesses or third parties who can provide declarations, and look for transaction evidence that links the asset to the trust. This groundwork is essential to determine the strength of the case and to plan the most effective approach to filing in the local probate court.
We examine the trust instrument and any amendments to confirm trustee powers and distribution terms. This review clarifies the settlor’s intent and identifies whether the trust specifically contemplates the asset at issue. We also look at related documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and prior estate filings to assemble a comprehensive picture of the estate plan. Clear understanding of the trust’s provisions guides our evidence gathering and petition drafting strategy.
Collecting deeds, bank and brokerage statements, canceled checks, and correspondence helps demonstrate that an asset was intended for the trust. We also prepare declarations for the trustee and witnesses to explain the factual basis for the claim. When necessary, we work with title companies to obtain recorded histories and with financial institutions to request account histories. Comprehensive documentation strengthens the petition and reduces the likelihood of contested hearings.
After assembling evidence, we draft the Heggstad petition with detailed factual statements, legal arguments, and supporting exhibits. The filing includes the trust documents, declarations, and any deeds or account statements that corroborate the claim. Proper notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is critical, so we prepare service materials and coordinate filing with the Marin County probate court. Clear, organized petitions help the court understand the requested relief and facilitate efficient scheduling of hearings and rulings.
We organize the petition to present a logical narrative supported by exhibits and declarations. The filing explains why the asset should be treated as trust property, summarizes the factual background, and cites applicable law. Presenting evidence in a clear, concise manner helps the court assess the claim quickly. Attention to procedural detail and accurate service ensures the petition complies with local rules and avoids delays caused by technical defects in the filing process.
Proper service is required on beneficiaries, trustees, creditors when necessary, and any other interested parties. We prepare and process all service documents, file proof of service with the court, and handle any requests for special notice required by local rules. Timely and accurate service prevents objections based on procedural grounds and ensures the court can proceed to evaluate the petition on its merits without unnecessary delay or repeated filings.
Once the petition is filed and served, the court reviews the materials and schedules a hearing if required. We prepare our client for the hearing by summarizing evidence and anticipated questions, and we submit any reply materials if objections are raised. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it will issue an order declaring the asset to be trust property and directing appropriate steps for transfer or distribution. The order provides the trustee with clear authority to proceed under the trust’s terms.
If interested parties object to the petition, the process may involve written opposition and a contested hearing. We prepare responses to objections by highlighting the documentary evidence and witness declarations that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. During hearings, clear presentation of facts and exhibits helps the judge reach a decision. Our preparation focuses on addressing likely concerns and ensuring the trustee is equipped to proceed once a ruling is entered, minimizing the risk of further challenge after the court’s decision.
Following a favorable order, we assist the trustee in implementing its terms, including providing certified copies to title companies, financial institutions, and other third parties. The court order functions as strong evidence for retitling property or releasing account assets to the trust. We also advise trustees on next steps for distribution or sale, ensuring all actions align with the order and trust provisions. Proper implementation helps complete the administration process with clarity and reduces future disputes.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing in California asking the probate court to recognize that certain assets were intended to be part of a decedent’s living trust despite remaining titled in the decedent’s name at death. The petition sets out facts and documentary evidence—such as the trust document, deeds, canceled checks, or account statements—that support the conclusion the settlor intended the trust to own the asset. The court reviews the submitted materials and, if satisfied, issues an order treating the asset as trust property, which helps trustees manage and distribute the asset under the trust. This remedy is used when informal corrections are not possible, when institutions require a court order, or when conflicting claims arise among heirs or creditors. It provides a formal, recorded judicial determination that can reduce future disputes and help third parties accept transfers or sales. The exact approach and evidentiary expectations vary, so careful document preparation and clear declarations strengthen the petition and improve the chance of a favorable ruling.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the completeness of the documentation and local court scheduling. Initial preparation to gather trust documents, deeds, account statements, and declarations can take several weeks to a few months depending on how quickly records and witnesses can be located. After filing, the court must process the petition, serve interested parties, and schedule a hearing if required, which can add additional weeks or months depending on Marin County’s calendar and any objections. Contested proceedings will extend the timeline, especially if opposing parties raise factual disputes requiring additional evidence or a longer hearing. When matters are uncontested and documentation is strong, courts may rule more quickly. Early organization of evidence and prompt response to court requests and service requirements helps minimize delays in the overall process.
Supportive evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes the original trust instrument and any amendments, deeds showing the property’s title history, account statements, canceled checks that demonstrate trust-related transactions, and correspondence referring to the settlor’s intent. Declarations from the trustee, family members, or third parties describing the settlor’s statements or actions regarding the asset are also persuasive. A certification of trust may be used to confirm the trust’s existence and the trustee’s authority without disclosing confidential terms. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Clear documentary links between the asset and trust administration are powerful, and credible, detailed declarations help bridge gaps. The stronger the documentary and testimonial record, the more likely the court will grant the petition and issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property.
A Heggstad petition can allow specific assets to be administered and distributed under the terms of a trust, potentially avoiding probate for those items. However, whether probate is entirely avoided depends on the nature and scope of the remaining assets and whether other property must still pass through probate. A pour-over will, for example, may still require probate for assets not covered by the Heggstad petition, so each case requires evaluation to determine if full probate will be necessary for other parts of the estate. In many instances, successfully resolving title for particular assets through a petition reduces the scope of probate and the related time and expense. Trustees and beneficiaries should assess all estate assets and consider whether additional petitions or transfers are needed to minimize probate exposure while preserving the settlor’s plan for distribution of remaining assets.
When filing a Heggstad petition, the trustee must provide notice to all interested parties, including beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law, and any known creditors who might have claims. The notice requirements ensure that parties with potential rights have the opportunity to object and participate in the proceeding. Proper service of the petition and supporting documents is a procedural necessity and a factor courts consider when scheduling hearings and issuing rulings. Failure to provide required notice can lead to delays or dismissal of the petition, so careful attention to service rules and deadlines is essential. Our office assists trustees in identifying the people and entities entitled to notice, preparing service documents, and filing proof of service with the court to maintain procedural compliance and keep the matter moving forward.
If an interested party objects to the petition, the court will typically schedule a hearing where both sides present evidence and legal arguments. The objecting party may dispute the settlor’s intent, challenge the sufficiency of documentation, or raise competing claims to the asset. The court evaluates the evidence presented by both sides and decides whether the petition should be granted, denied, or modified. Contested proceedings may require additional declarations, discovery, or testimony to resolve factual disputes. Objections lengthen the process and can increase costs, so it is often helpful to try to resolve disputes before filing when feasible. When objections cannot be resolved, careful preparation and presentation of documentary evidence and declarations improve the trustee’s chance of prevailing at the hearing. The court’s order, once issued, provides a binding resolution to the dispute.
Yes, when a court issues an order recognizing an asset as trust property under a Heggstad petition, title companies, banks, and other institutions generally accept the order as authoritative evidence of ownership. Certified copies of the court order, accompanied by trust documents or a certification of trust, provide the documentary support institutions need to retitle property or release funds to the trustee. This court-backed documentation offers practical assurance when third parties are otherwise reluctant to act on trustee authority alone. While most institutions respect a formal court order, implementing the order may involve additional administrative steps such as submitting certified copies, updating records, and coordinating with title insurers. Our office assists with these implementation steps to ensure the court’s ruling is effectively applied to complete transfers or transactions in accordance with the trust’s terms.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include negotiating directly with the financial institution or title company and using a certification of trust and the trustee’s documentation to retitle assets without court involvement. For small or uncontested matters, these informal routes may be faster and less costly. A pour-over will can also operate to transfer some assets to the trust, although assets passing under a will usually require probate. Informal agreements among heirs may work in cooperative situations but lack the finality of a court order. When institutions refuse to cooperate or when competing claims exist, a petition is often the most reliable way to achieve clear title. Deciding between informal resolution and a formal petition requires evaluating the asset’s value, the institution’s policies, the likelihood of challenges, and the desire for long-term certainty provided by a court order.
Trustees can file a Heggstad petition without counsel, but the process involves procedural requirements, careful evidence collection, and an understanding of local probate practice. Working with counsel helps ensure that the petition is properly framed, supporting documents are complete, and notices are correctly served to interested parties. Legal assistance can be especially valuable in contested matters or when real property and title issues are involved, reducing the risk of technical defects that could delay the court’s consideration. For trustees unfamiliar with probate procedures or the specific demands of a petition in Marin County, retaining counsel often provides practical benefits in navigating timelines and court rules. Counsel can manage filings, coordinate service, prepare declarations, and represent the trustee at hearings, allowing the trustee to focus on administration while the legal process proceeds efficiently.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the matter, the need for additional research or title work, and whether the petition is contested. Expenses typically include court filing fees, costs for obtaining certified documents and title reports, and attorney fees when counsel is retained. For uncontested petitions with readily available documents, costs can be moderate, while contested matters or those requiring extensive document retrieval and witness preparation will be more expensive due to additional time and legal work. It is helpful to obtain a clear estimate up front and to discuss potential cost-saving approaches such as attempting informal resolutions when appropriate. We provide transparent fee estimates tailored to each case and discuss options for minimizing expenses while preserving the goals of trust administration and legal clarity.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas