A Heggstad petition can help transfer assets into a trust when property titles were not updated before a person’s death. In many estate plans the decedent intended assets to be controlled by a living trust, but a failure to re-title accounts or deeds can create an obstacle. A Heggstad petition asks a court to declare that the decedent’s interest in specific assets belongs to the trust, allowing those assets to be administered under trust terms rather than through full probate. For families in Strawberry and nearby Marin County, this petition can shorten delays and reduce formal probate steps while honoring the decedent’s written plan.
If you are navigating estate settlement after a loved one’s death and you believe assets should pass through a trust, a Heggstad petition may be an efficient path to correct title without a full probate process. The petition requires presenting admissible evidence that the decedent intended the property to belong to the trust, such as the trust document, beneficiary directions, or consistent estate planning records. Courts review these factors carefully and will consider whether the transfer matches the decedent’s intent. In many cases a well-prepared petition reduces uncertainty and helps trustees distribute assets in line with the trust terms.
A Heggstad petition addresses a common post-death complication: assets that the decedent meant to fund into a trust but were still titled in their individual name. By seeking a judicial declaration that the trust is the proper owner, beneficiaries and trustees can resolve title issues without opening a full probate administration. This can save time and minimize court oversight, preserve privacy, and reduce costs associated with a prolonged probate. Proper handling of a Heggstad petition also helps prevent disputes among heirs and ensures the decedent’s written trust provisions are implemented as intended, providing clearer and more predictable estate administration for families.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients throughout San Jose and surrounding communities with trust-related matters, including Heggstad petitions. The firm focuses on clear communication, thorough document review, and careful case preparation when a court filing is needed. We review trust documents, asset records, and other evidence to present a persuasive case supporting trust ownership. By coordinating with trustees, beneficiaries, and financial institutions, we aim to resolve title concerns efficiently while keeping families informed about expected timelines and options. Our approach emphasizes practical solutions that align with client priorities for privacy and orderly asset distribution.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial filing used to show that certain decedent-owned property should be treated as trust property even though the title was never formally changed. The petition typically includes the trust instrument, proof of the decedent’s capacity and intent, and documentation about how the asset is described and was intended to be handled. Courts consider whether the trust language and surrounding circumstances support the transfer. This remedy is rooted in case law and is often used to avoid full probate when the trust clearly controls ownership, but additional steps or evidence may be needed to satisfy the court.
When preparing a Heggstad petition, it is important to gather all relevant estate planning documents, account statements, deeds, and correspondence that demonstrate the decedent’s intention. The petition may involve notifying interested parties and providing an evidentiary record to the court. A careful review of titles and beneficiary designations identifies assets that are affected. In some cases, banks or custodians will accept a court order declaring trust ownership and will re-title accounts accordingly. The overall goal is to align legal title with the decedent’s expressed estate planning decisions while minimizing delays for trustees and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition asks a court to declare that the decedent’s interest in property belongs to the named trust despite the absence of formal re-titling. The petition is grounded in precedent that permits judicial correction when the written estate plan and the decedent’s actions indicate intent to fund a trust. This legal tool is used to prevent assets from being treated as part of a probate estate when the trust should control distribution. The court evaluates the trust instrument, the description of the property, and any other evidence that clarifies the decedent’s intention to ensure the petition accurately reflects the estate plan.
Successful Heggstad petitions typically include a careful inventory of the contested asset, a certified copy of the trust, evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, and a clear explanation of why re-titling was not completed before death. The process requires drafting the petition, serving notice to interested parties, and providing supporting declarations and exhibits. The court may set a hearing to review the evidence and allow objections. Once the court issues an order declaring trust ownership, financial institutions and title companies can rely on that order to transfer or re-title the asset in the name of the trustee for administration under the trust terms.
Understanding common terms helps clarify the Heggstad petition process. Terms like trustee, settlor, trust instrument, probate, and re-titling frequently appear during review and court proceedings. Knowing what these words mean and how they relate to the petition makes it easier to prepare documentation and communicate with the court and financial institutions. Clear definitions can reduce confusion for trustees and beneficiaries when they are asked to provide records, sign declarations, or respond to notices required by the court during the petition process.
A trust instrument is the written document that creates a trust and sets out its terms, naming the settlor and trustee and describing how assets should be managed and distributed. For a Heggstad petition, the trust instrument is critical because it shows the decedent’s intent for specific property to be governed by the trust. Courts examine the trust language and any schedules that reference property to determine if the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Providing a clear, dated copy of the trust is often the first step in filing the petition and supporting the claim of trust ownership.
Probate avoidance refers to legal strategies intended to transfer assets to successors without the delays and public administration of probate court. A Heggstad petition is one such remedy, used to align asset title with trust ownership when re-titling was incomplete. When a court declares that property belongs to a trust, that asset can typically be administered under the trust’s terms without entering formal probate, saving time and preserving privacy. Achieving probate avoidance through a petition requires careful documentation and persuasive proof that the decedent intended trust administration for the asset in question.
Re-titling is the act of changing the legal owner of an asset from an individual to a trustee in the name of the trust, which is the usual step for funding a living trust during the settlor’s lifetime. When re-titling does not occur before death, a Heggstad petition asks a court to recognize that the re-titling should have taken place and that the trust is the rightful owner. Documentation of attempts to re-title, or explanations why re-titling did not occur, can be important evidence when supporting the petition to bring asset titles in line with the trust terms.
The trustee is the person or entity appointed by the trust instrument to manage trust assets and carry out distributions according to the trust’s terms. In a Heggstad petition, the trustee often petitions the court or responds to a petition that seeks declaration of trust ownership for specific assets. The trustee’s role includes gathering records, presenting evidence to the court, and, once title issues are resolved, administering the assets for the benefit of the named beneficiaries according to the trust document. Clear trustee actions and documentation support the petition process.
When assets are not properly titled to a trust, beneficiaries and trustees should weigh several legal options, including initiating a Heggstad petition, filing a limited probate proceeding, or pursuing a small estate affidavit when eligible. The choice depends on asset value, complexity of ownership, potential disputes among heirs, and the clarity of the trust instrument. A Heggstad petition is targeted at correcting ownership in favor of the trust and is appropriate when the intent to fund the trust is well-documented. Other options may be appropriate when the asset value is low or when different statutory procedures provide faster transfer without a formal court declaration.
California’s small estate procedures may permit distribution of certain assets without a full probate if the estate falls below statutory thresholds and the required affidavits or declarations are filed. When asset values are modest and ownership is clear, a small estate affidavit or summary probate transfer might be a faster solution than a Heggstad petition. Those procedures require strict compliance with statutory requirements and notice to interested parties. Families should confirm eligibility and weigh timelines and institutional acceptance before choosing this route, as banks and title companies may have their own requirements for accepting such affidavits.
Certain assets pass outside of probate by beneficiary designation or payable-on-death designations, and when those designations are current and uncontested, a trustee may not need to file a Heggstad petition. For example, accounts with valid transfer-on-death designations or IRAs that name beneficiaries can transfer directly to designated recipients. When the main issue is documentation rather than title, coordinating with the financial institution to provide required forms and affidavits may resolve ownership without court intervention. Trustees should review account type and beneficiary listings to determine whether a simpler transfer route is available.
When assets are substantial, jointly owned with complex title arrangements, or involve real property and multiple interested parties, a comprehensive legal approach helps avoid future disputes. High-value assets may attract challenges from heirs or creditors, so preparing a thorough petition with complete documentary support and clear notice to interested parties reduces the chance of objections later. The court’s review will be more intensive for complicated holdings, so careful fact-finding, property descriptions, and legal argumentation help ensure the order accurately reflects the decedent’s intent and protects trustees and beneficiaries during distribution.
When there are conflicting estate planning documents, ambiguous trust language, or competing claims about the decedent’s intent, a more comprehensive legal approach is necessary to present coherent evidence to the court. In such scenarios, collecting witness declarations, contemporaneous correspondence, and records of the decedent’s actions can strengthen the petition. The court will weigh the reliability of evidence and the credibility of declarations, so systematic preparation and careful legal presentation aim to resolve ambiguities and minimize the risk of prolonged litigation or later challenges to the trust’s handling of assets.
A comprehensive petition prepares a robust record that clarifies the decedent’s intent and supports a judicial declaration of trust ownership, which financial institutions are more likely to accept without further dispute. Detailed documentation reduces delays in re-titling and allows trustees to move forward with trust administration and distributions. Careful notice and procedure help avoid surprises from unexpected claimants and foster smoother communication among beneficiaries, minimizing the potential for contested proceedings and reducing total time spent resolving title problems.
By addressing evidence gaps proactively and coordinating with all relevant parties, a comprehensive approach can save family members from the emotional and financial costs of drawn-out court battles. It also helps ensure that assets are administered under the trust’s terms, preserving the decedent’s estate plan and maintaining privacy compared with open probate. When a court order is secured, trustees can rely on it to complete transfers and close accounts, providing legal certainty and enabling prompt distribution according to the trust document’s instructions.
A well-prepared petition often shortens the time needed to resolve title problems because courts can act more quickly when presented with complete documentation and clear arguments. This reduces the administrative burden on trustees who otherwise might wait months for institutions to accept transfers. When asset descriptions are precise and evidence of intent is assembled in advance, financial institutions and title companies see the court order as a final step that enables re-titling and account transfers, helping beneficiaries access their inheritances more predictably.
By documenting the decedent’s intent and giving appropriate notice to interested parties, the chance of later challenges to the court’s order is reduced. Thorough preparation helps the court issue a declaration with confidence that the trust is the rightful owner. This legal certainty minimizes the potential for disputes that could require reopening matters in court, which would increase costs and delay distributions. Trustees and beneficiaries benefit from a more final resolution that supports orderly trust administration and preserves family relationships.
Gathering complete documentation before filing reduces delays and strengthens your position. Include the signed trust document, any schedules or amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and correspondence that shows the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust. If there were attempts to re-title the asset during the decedent’s lifetime, include records of those efforts. Declarations from trustees or witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s stated intent are also helpful. A full evidentiary package allows the court to review the matter efficiently and improves the prospects for a prompt declaration of trust ownership.
Speak with banks, brokers, or title companies to understand their re-titling requirements and what evidence they will accept following a court order. Some institutions may request certified copies, original documents, or additional affidavits before transferring title. Coordinating with these entities can clarify the evidence needed and set realistic expectations for timing. After obtaining a court order, provide institutions with the necessary certified documents promptly to complete transfers and close accounts. Clear communication helps trustees avoid additional procedural steps and expedites the administration of trust assets.
Consider a Heggstad petition when a decedent’s trust clearly indicates ownership of particular assets but those assets remain titled in the decedent’s individual name at death. The petition is appropriate where the written plan and supporting evidence demonstrate the intent to fund the trust, particularly for assets of meaningful value or when re-titling is impractical after death. People often pursue this path to reduce probate-related delays, preserve privacy, and ensure assets are administered according to the trust’s provisions rather than under general probate rules.
You should also consider a petition when financial institutions refuse to recognize the trustee’s authority without a court order, or when the absence of a declaration would force a full probate administration that the trust was designed to avoid. A successful petition can provide the legal basis for re-titling accounts and transferring real property to the trustee, enabling distributions to proceed under the trust’s terms. Timely action and careful documentation are key to presenting a compelling case that aligns title with the decedent’s estate planning intentions.
Typical circumstances include real property that remains in the decedent’s name, bank or brokerage accounts lacking trustee title, retirement accounts with unclear beneficiary designations, or assets mistakenly omitted from trust schedules. Also common are cases where the settlor prepared a trust but did not complete administrative steps needed to fund it, or where changes in property ownership occurred close to the time of death and paperwork was incomplete. In each scenario the petition seeks a judicial determination that the trust was intended to own the asset and that re-titling should be recognized.
Real estate is frequently the subject of Heggstad petitions when a deed remains in the decedent’s individual name even though the trust includes language or schedules specifying that property should be held by the trust. Courts will examine the trust, any transfer documentation, and the circumstances surrounding ownership to determine if the trust should now be recognized as the owner. Resolving title issues through a petition allows trustees to manage or distribute the property under the trust terms without a separate probate proceeding, provided the court finds the evidence persuasive.
Bank and brokerage accounts often remain in the individual settlor’s name because re-titling requires account-level requests that were never completed. A Heggstad petition can request that the court declare these accounts trust property where the trust and account records show the decedent intended the trust to control those funds. Financial institutions may then re-title accounts to the trustee or release funds to the trustee for administration under the trust, avoiding probate procedures for those assets when the court’s declaration is granted.
Assets acquired after the trust was created or inadvertently omitted from trust schedules can create gaps between the trust document and actual holdings. A Heggstad petition can bridge that gap by showing the decedent intended those assets to be governed by the trust. Evidence such as contemporaneous statements, documentation of purchase, or notes reflecting the decedent’s plan for the asset can support the petition. This remedy helps bring all intended property within the trust’s administration and ensures distributions follow the settlor’s plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman are available to guide trustees and families through Heggstad petitions and related trust funding matters in Strawberry and surrounding areas. We assist with document assembly, evidence collection, petition drafting, and court filings, and we communicate with banks and title companies to facilitate re-titling after the court order. Our office focuses on clear explanations of options, realistic timelines for court processes, and practical steps to move assets into trust administration while reducing unnecessary delays and keeping beneficiaries informed throughout.
Engaging a local estate planning law office helps ensure petitions are prepared with attention to California law and Marin County court practices. Familiarity with regional clerks, procedural expectations, and typical evidentiary standards streamlines filings and notice procedures. We work to collect the specific documents and declarations the court expects and to present them in an organized manner to reduce questions or requests for supplemental materials. Local relationships with title companies and registrars can also help speed transfers following a court order.
A careful approach to a Heggstad petition includes identifying potentially interested parties and making sure notices are properly served, reducing the risk of objections that could extend the matter. We prepare clear declarations, compile trust and asset records, and coordinate with trustees to ensure all procedural requirements are met. This thorough preparation aims to provide the court with a complete picture of the decedent’s intent so the order can be issued efficiently and relied upon by financial institutions for re-titling and distribution.
When banks or title companies require a court order before transferring assets, having a well-documented petition and follow-up plan minimizes delays in trust administration. We assist trustees after the order by providing the certified documents institutions request and guiding them through re-titling. Clear communication with beneficiaries about expected steps and timing helps reduce confusion and the risk of disputes. Our focus is on practical solutions that honor the decedent’s estate plan while supporting trustees in carrying out their duties responsibly.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust instrument and asset records to identify which items require a petition. We then assemble supporting documents, prepare declarations, and draft the petition with clear factual and legal support. After filing, we ensure proper notice to interested parties and respond to any procedural inquiries from the court. Once an order is obtained, we coordinate with financial institutions and title companies to effect re-titling and transfers. Throughout the matter we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed of expected steps and timelines to support smooth administration.
In the initial stage we review the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any communications that indicate the decedent’s intention for the assets, and we identify gaps or missing items. This review clarifies which assets should be addressed in the petition and what supporting evidence will be required. Gathering witness declarations, copies of prior attempts to re-title, and correspondence with institutions strengthens the petition. Clear organization of records at the outset reduces requests for additional materials and positions the matter for efficient court review.
We compile a thorough inventory of assets that appear to belong to the trust but remain in the decedent’s name, documenting account numbers, property descriptions, and dates. This includes deeds, bank statements, brokerage records, and any schedules attached to the trust. Where possible, we collect evidence of the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust, such as contemporaneous communications or records of transfers. This foundation supports a focused petition that addresses each item with precision and clarity, streamlining the court’s review.
Preparing signed declarations from the trustee, witnesses, or others with direct knowledge of the decedent’s intent provides the factual support the court needs to evaluate the petition. We draft and organize exhibits so the judge can easily match the trust language to the described asset, and we include any documentary proof of attempts to re-title prior to death. These declarations are formatted to satisfy court rules and to make the factual narrative clear, reducing the likelihood of requests for supplemental information and facilitating a timely hearing or ruling.
After preparing the petition and supporting materials, we file with the appropriate probate court and follow statutory notice requirements for interested parties, including beneficiaries and known heirs. Proper service and proof of service ensure parties receive notice and the court’s jurisdictional requirements are met. We monitor any responses or objections and prepare replies as needed. If a hearing is set, we present the affidavits and documentation to the court, responding to any questions or evidentiary concerns to obtain the order that declares trust ownership.
Serving notice correctly is essential to proceed and to avoid procedural delay, and we ensure that all required parties receive accurate service of the petition and accompanying documents. Proofs of service are prepared and filed to demonstrate compliance with court rules, and we track deadlines for responses. Providing clear information to interested parties up front often reduces objections and helps the court consider the petition on the scheduled timetable, avoiding extensions or adjournments caused by defective notices.
We prepare the court filings needed to present the petition, including proposed orders, declarations, and supporting exhibits in a format acceptable to the court. If a hearing is required, we organize witnesses, exhibits, and legal arguments so the judge can evaluate the facts efficiently. Anticipating common questions and providing thorough documentary support helps the court issue an order declaring trust ownership, which in turn facilitates re-titling and asset transfer once the order is final.
Once the court issues an order declaring that the trust owns the asset, we assist trustees in obtaining certified copies and providing them to financial institutions or the county recorder for re-titling. Different institutions may have varying requirements for accepting a court order, so we coordinate closely to complete any forms they request and to communicate deadlines. After re-titling, the trustee can administer the asset under the trust terms and proceed with distributions, investments, or sale as appropriate in accordance with the trust document.
Following a favorable court order, we obtain certified copies and deliver them to banks, brokers, and the county recorder as necessary to effect re-titling. Institutions may require original certified documents or additional affidavits, and we assist trustees in meeting those requirements so transfers are accepted without unnecessary delay. Timely submission of the certified order and related documents completes the legal chain needed for re-titling and enables the trustee to manage or distribute the asset in line with the trust’s provisions.
After title issues are resolved, trustees continue with trust administration tasks such as inventorying assets, notifying beneficiaries, and carrying out permitted distributions. We provide guidance on statutory and trust-based obligations and on recordkeeping that supports transparent administration. If further filings or accountings are necessary, we assist with those steps to close out the matter properly. The result is an orderly transition of the previously mis-titled assets into trust management and distribution consistent with the decedent’s plan.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing asking the probate court to declare that certain property should be treated as trust property even though it was not formally re-titled before the settlor’s death. It is used when a decedent clearly intended the asset to be included in a living trust, but the title remained in the individual’s name. The petition presents the trust document and supporting evidence to show intent and requests an order recognizing the trust as the rightful owner so the asset can be administered under the trust rather than through full probate. Courts assess whether the trust language, schedules, and other records demonstrate the decedent’s plan to fund the trust. The petition includes declarations, copies of the trust, and documentation of the asset and any attempts to re-title before death. When the court grants the petition, trustees can usually present the order to financial institutions or the county recorder to complete re-titling, enabling administration under the trust’s terms and avoiding a longer probate process for those assets.
The timing for a Heggstad petition can vary depending on the complexity of the title issue, the court’s caseload, and whether interested parties file objections. Simple petitions with clear documentary support and no objections can move relatively quickly, whereas disputed matters or those requiring additional evidence may take longer. Preparing a complete petition and properly serving interested parties helps avoid delays caused by procedural defects or requests for supplemental materials. In Marin County courts, scheduling and processing times may differ from other jurisdictions, and coordination with financial institutions can also affect the overall timeline. After the court issues an order, additional time may be needed for banks or the county recorder to accept the order and complete re-titling. Close communication with the court clerk and institutions involved can reduce uncertainty about expected steps and approximate timing.
Courts consider the trust document itself, any schedules or amendments, contemporaneous communications or witness declarations, and records showing the asset’s intended treatment. Declarations from trustees or witnesses who recall the settlor’s expressed intent can be persuasive. The court will also review whether there were documented attempts to re-title the asset before death, and whether the property description in the trust corresponds sufficiently to the asset at issue. Additional admissible evidence might include letters, affidavits describing the settlor’s planning actions, or financial institution records that reflect the settlor’s intention. The strength of the evidence determines how readily the court will declare the trust to be the rightful owner and guides whether further hearings or supplemental filings are required to resolve uncertainties.
A Heggstad petition can prevent a particular asset from entering a full probate administration by obtaining a court declaration that the trust owns the asset, allowing trustee administration instead of probate distribution. However, not all assets are appropriate for a petition, and a court may require additional steps if there are unresolved claims or clear disputes about intent. The petition addresses ownership questions for specific assets but does not replace probate when other estate circumstances require formal administration. In some situations a combination of methods, such as small estate procedures or other probate filings, might be required for different assets. The ultimate effect on probate depends on the scope of assets covered by the petition and whether the court’s order is accepted by institutions so those assets transfer directly into trust-side administration without probate.
Yes, beneficiaries or heirs who receive notice may object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset belongs to the decedent’s probate estate or if they dispute the decedent’s intent. When objections are filed, the court may require additional evidence, hold a hearing, and evaluate conflicting claims. Proper notice and transparency about the petition and the reasons for seeking a declaration reduce surprises and can sometimes prevent contested filings. If a challenge occurs, the court will weigh the competing evidence and decide whether the trust’s documentation and supporting declarations are sufficient to establish trust ownership. Preparing a robust record and addressing potential objections in advance helps to reduce the risk of a prolonged contested proceeding and supports a more definitive judicial resolution.
After the court grants a Heggstad petition, the trustee typically obtains certified copies of the order and presents them to banks, brokers, or the county recorder to effect re-titling. Institutions often require certified documents and may have internal forms or affidavits to accept the court order as the basis for transferring or re-titling the asset. Once re-titled, the asset is administered according to the trust’s terms and provided to beneficiaries as directed. If institutions are slow to act or request additional documentation, trustees may need assistance coordinating the required steps. Having counsel assist with presenting certified orders and responding to institutional requests helps ensure transfers are completed efficiently so trust administration and distributions can proceed.
Alternatives include small estate affidavits, summary probate transfers, or pursuing direct negotiations with financial institutions to accept trust documentation without a court order in some cases. The suitability of alternatives depends on asset value, the institution’s policies, and whether the trust’s ownership can be demonstrated without litigation. For modest estates or accounts with clear payable-on-death designations, those less formal routes can be faster and less costly. However, when institutions refuse to accept trust documentation or when the asset is significant or disputed, a Heggstad petition provides a more definitive legal remedy. Evaluating options with attention to the specific asset types and institutional requirements helps determine the most appropriate path for efficient transfer and trust administration.
Many financial institutions will comply with a court order that declares trust ownership, but acceptance can vary depending on internal policies and the specifics of the order. Some institutions may request certified copies, additional affidavits, or their own forms before they will re-title accounts. Communicating with the institution in advance to learn their requirements can help ensure the court order is drafted to meet those needs and avoid further delays. If an institution resists, additional steps may be necessary, such as providing supplemental declarations or clarifying language in the court order. Legal assistance in coordinating with the institution and, if needed, seeking enforcement or clarification from the court helps ensure that the order is honored and re-titling is completed.
A Heggstad petition itself does not change tax liabilities but it can determine who holds legal title for purposes of administering the asset, which influences reporting and any subsequent transactions. Trustees should consider potential income tax or estate tax consequences when transferring or selling newly re-titled assets, and they may need to obtain tax advice specific to the asset type and the trust’s structure. Creditor claims that affect the decedent’s estate may still need to be addressed under applicable law before distributions are made. Courts and trustees must consider whether filing the petition and effecting transfers affects creditor rights or statutory deadlines. In some cases, the trustee may need to provide notice or follow procedures to preserve creditor rights. Trustees should keep detailed records and consult appropriate advisors when tax or creditor issues could be implicated by transferring ownership into the trust.
To get started, assemble the trust document, any amendments, deeds, account statements, and any records showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Make a list of assets you believe should be moved into the trust and note any attempts to re-title them prior to death. Gathering witness contact information and any correspondence about the decedent’s planning will be helpful. With these materials in hand, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to schedule a review and discussion of potential next steps. During an initial consultation we will review the documents, evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, and outline the likely process, including notice requirements and possible timelines. If a petition is pursued, we will assist with drafting the pleadings, assembling declarations and exhibits, filing with the court, and coordinating with institutions to complete re-titling after an order is obtained so trustees can proceed with administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas