A trust modification petition is a legal process used to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances, law, or the settlor’s intentions evolve over time. Residents of Tiburon and the broader Marin County area turn to careful, locally informed representation to evaluate whether a modification is appropriate, how to proceed under California law, and how to protect beneficiaries’ interests. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused guidance on trust modification petitions, explaining potential outcomes and helping clients make decisions that preserve family goals and asset management while complying with state procedures and court requirements.
When considering a trust modification, it is important to assess the trust instrument, the powers reserved to the settlor, the consent of beneficiaries, and any terms that could limit changes. California law allows modifications in a variety of circumstances, including mistake, changed circumstances, or to achieve tax or Medicaid planning objectives. Our approach begins with a clear evaluation of the trust documents and family dynamics, followed by a stepwise plan to prepare petitions, notices, and supporting declarations. Throughout the process we emphasize clear communication, realistic timelines, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s needs.
Trust modification can prevent unnecessary litigation, resolve ambiguities, and align trust documents with the settlor’s current wishes and circumstances. Changes in family structure, tax law, or financial holdings can make original trust terms impractical or undesirable. By pursuing a modification petition, a trustee or interested party can obtain a court order that clarifies authority, updates beneficiary provisions, or corrects errors in wording. This proactive step can reduce future disputes among heirs, protect assets from unintended consequences, and ensure the governing documents support practical administration and distribution according to modern realities.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout San Jose, Tiburon, and the broader California area in estate planning and trust administration matters. The firm focuses on clear legal counsel for trust amendments, petitions, and related probate matters. We emphasize practical guidance and thoughtful advocacy designed to protect your interests and maintain family harmony when legal changes are needed. Our team handles preparation of petitions, court filings, beneficiary communications, and settlement discussions while keeping clients informed of timelines and likely outcomes at each stage of the process.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a court to change trust terms when informal amendment is not possible or appropriate. Grounds for a petition include ambiguous language, clerical errors, changed circumstances that frustrate the settlor’s intent, or the need to add provisions that were not anticipated at the time the trust was created. The court evaluates the petition in light of the trust instrument, applicable statutes, and the interests of beneficiaries. Preparation requires careful factual documentation, legal analysis of statutory authority, and sensitivity to potential beneficiary objections.
Not all modifications require court intervention; many trusts contain reserved amendment powers allowing the settlor to amend terms directly. When those powers are absent or when parties disagree, a petition provides a structured method to request judicial approval. Proceedings typically involve notices to interested parties, declarations explaining the proposed changes, and supporting evidence of the reasons for modification. Outcomes can range from limited corrections and clarifications to broader revisions approved by the court that carry binding effect for trustees and beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition asks a court to alter or clarify trust provisions because of mistake, ambiguity, or changed circumstances that prevent proper administration. The petitioner must show why the existing terms cannot be carried out as intended, how the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s probable intent, and why the modification serves the interests of beneficiaries. The court’s review balances adherence to the original trust document with equitable considerations, ensuring that any modification respects legal standards and provides fair notice and an opportunity for interested parties to be heard.
Filing a trust modification petition requires assembling the trust documents, drafting a clear petition that outlines the requested changes and factual basis, and serving notice on trustees and beneficiaries. Supporting declarations and exhibits demonstrate the need for modification, such as evidence of changed circumstances or mistakes in drafting. The court may set hearings, require mediation, or request additional information before ruling. After a decision, orders are recorded and trustees implement the changes. Proper preparation and communication can limit disputes and streamline court review.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification petitions helps clients make informed decisions and follow the process with confidence. This glossary clarifies roles, filings, and legal concepts that commonly arise during modification proceedings. Clear definitions of terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, and notice reduce confusion and help set expectations about timing, evidence, and potential outcomes. If unfamiliar terms arise during your case, ask for plain-language explanations to ensure you are fully informed at each stage.
A trust amendment is a voluntary change made by the settlor under powers reserved within the trust instrument, often using a simple written amendment document. A trust modification petition, by contrast, is a court-requested change when the settlor cannot or will not amend the trust directly or when there is disagreement among interested parties. Modifications address issues like mistakes, ambiguous provisions, or circumstances unforeseen by the settlor. A court order provides legal authority to implement changes that may be binding on trustees and beneficiaries, ensuring clarity and enforceability.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and established its terms, while the trustee is the individual or entity charged with managing the trust assets and carrying out the settlor’s instructions. When a settlor cannot act, or when past instructions need clarification, petitions may be brought to adjust administrative powers or modify distribution rules. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries and must follow trust terms unless a court-authorized modification changes those terms. Understanding these roles helps identify who can petition and who must receive notice.
A petition initiates the court process to request a trust modification and sets out the legal and factual basis for the change. Notice refers to the formal delivery of petition documents to trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties who have a right to be informed and to respond. A hearing is the court proceeding where parties can present arguments, evidence, and declarations supporting or opposing the requested modification. The court evaluates the petition, considering statutory law and equitable principles, before making a decision.
Beneficiaries are individuals or entities entitled to benefit from the trust, and they have a right to be notified of proposed changes and to contest a petition if they believe it harms their interests. Courts weigh beneficiary objections carefully, balancing the settlor’s intent against fairness and legal standards. A successful petition typically includes clear justification for the modification and either consent from affected beneficiaries or persuasive reasons why a change should be allowed despite opposition. Open communication can sometimes resolve disputes without prolonged litigation.
When trust terms need adjustment, several options exist: informal amendment by the settlor, family settlement agreements among interested parties, or a court petition for modification. Informal amendment is simplest when the settlor retains power to amend. Settlement agreements can resolve disputes without court involvement but require consensus among parties to be effective. A court petition becomes necessary when there is disagreement, incapacity, or legal barriers to informal change. Each option carries different costs, timelines, and risks, and choosing the best path depends on the trust’s terms and the parties involved.
If the trust instrument expressly reserves amendment powers to the settlor and the settlor is available and able to act, amending the trust outside of court is often the most efficient solution. These amendments can be narrowly tailored to address minor drafting errors, update distributions, or change administrative provisions without court involvement. The process typically involves drafting a concise amendment, executing it according to required formalities, and ensuring all records and trustees are updated. This approach reduces legal costs and avoids public court filings.
When all beneficiaries and trustees agree on the proposed changes, a family settlement or written agreement can resolve disputes without judicial intervention. Such settlements may reallocate distributions, clarify trustee powers, or correct unintended provisions. For these agreements to be durable, they should be carefully drafted, signed by all interested parties, and integrated into trust records. While settlement saves time and expense, it requires full consensus and clear documentation to prevent future disagreements or challenges to the validity of the agreement.
A court petition is often necessary when parties disagree about whether a change is appropriate, when the settlor lacks capacity to amend the trust, or when language in the trust is ambiguous and requires judicial interpretation. In these scenarios, a structured court process ensures that all interested parties receive notice and have an opportunity to present evidence. The court’s involvement helps produce a definitive ruling that clarifies trustee powers and beneficiary rights, allowing trust administration to proceed with legal authority and reduced uncertainty.
When a trust contains drafting errors, contradictions, or terms that hinder administration, a petition can request corrective orders to align the document with the settlor’s intended result. Complex legal questions involving tax consequences, creditor rights, or third-party interests may also require judicial clarification. Proceeding through the court allows evidence and expert declarations to be presented and provides a binding resolution. This comprehensive approach reduces future litigation risk by creating a clear, enforceable order governing trust administration.
A court-approved modification provides durable clarity about the trust’s terms and trustees’ authority, which helps avoid later disputes among beneficiaries and supports smoother administration. Judicial review can resolve ambiguities, correct mistakes, and validate changes that cannot be achieved through amendment or private settlement. Once the court issues an order, trustees can act with confidence that the modification is enforceable, and beneficiaries have a clear understanding of their rights and expectations. This certainty benefits long-term estate and asset management.
Pursuing modification through the court also creates a formal record that can be useful in later interactions with financial institutions, tax authorities, and other third parties. The court’s imprimatur reduces the likelihood of future challenges and provides a transparent roadmap for trustees to follow. Additionally, court procedures ensure that interested parties receive notice and have the opportunity to be heard, creating a fair and orderly resolution process when private agreement cannot be reached or when the trust document requires judicial oversight.
One of the principal benefits of a court-ordered modification is legal finality: the court’s order provides authoritative direction that trustees and beneficiaries must follow. This certainty reduces the risk of subsequent litigation over the same issues and allows trustees to implement changes without repeated challenges. Administrative certainty also simplifies interactions with banks, brokerage firms, and title companies by presenting a clear judicial record supporting the trustee’s authority to manage, invest, or distribute trust assets according to the revised terms.
Court-supervised modification can protect the interests of vulnerable beneficiaries and reduce the risk that administration will deviate from the settlor’s intended protections. When trust terms are unclear or outdated, beneficiaries such as minors or individuals with special needs may be exposed to uncertainty. A judicial order that clarifies distribution timing, conditions, or trustee responsibilities strengthens safeguards and provides a clear path for long-term care, oversight, and financial management consistent with the settlor’s original goals.
Start by collecting the original trust, any amendments, related wills such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and other relevant estate planning documents. Organize account statements, deeds, and beneficiary designations that relate to trust assets, and create a timeline of events that explain why modification is necessary. Clear documentation supports a petition by demonstrating the settlor’s intent, the need for change, and any mistakes that occurred during drafting. Well-organized records also save time and reduce the cost of preparing court filings and declarations.
When a petition is filed, supporting declarations that explain the factual basis for the requested modification are essential. Provide clear narratives, documentary evidence, and, where appropriate, testimony demonstrating changed circumstances, drafting errors, or the settlor’s probable intent. Declarations should be organized, factual, and free of inflammatory language. Strong supporting documentation helps the court appreciate the purpose of the proposed change and can lead to a swifter, more favorable resolution for everyone involved.
Families pursue trust modification for a variety of reasons, including unanticipated life changes, ambiguous language that prevents proper administration, or errors in drafting that create conflicting instructions. Changes in tax law, the birth or death of beneficiaries, divorce, or new asset types can all make original trust provisions impractical. A petition allows the court to align the trust with the settlor’s original intent or to address modern circumstances that could otherwise cause disputes or unintended results during trust administration.
Other common drivers for modification include correcting clerical mistakes, clarifying trustee powers and successor designations, or implementing changes necessary for Medicaid planning or tax efficiency. When the settlor lacks capacity to sign an amendment or when beneficiaries disagree about a change, filing a petition ensures a neutral decision-maker evaluates the matter. The court can issue binding orders that preserve the trust’s purpose and reduce future litigation risk, allowing trustees to manage assets according to clearly defined terms.
Circumstances that commonly require a petition include ambiguous bequests, conflicting provisions between the trust and other estate planning documents, changes in family circumstances like remarriage or adoption, and the need to update trustee compensation or powers. Additionally, newly acquired assets, such as business interests or retirement accounts, may require trust language adjustments to ensure proper management and distribution. These practical concerns often necessitate formal court review when informal amendment is not available or when stakeholders cannot reach agreement.
When a trust contains ambiguous terms or internal inconsistencies, trustees may lack guidance on how to administer assets or make distributions. Ambiguity can lead to disputes among beneficiaries and create delays in administration. A petition asking the court to interpret or modify the language can produce a clear directive that trustees must follow. The court’s determination provides legal certainty and helps ensure distributions and fiduciary actions align with the settlor’s likely intent, reducing the chance of future litigation.
Changes such as births, deaths, divorces, or substantial changes in asset composition can render original trust provisions outdated or unsuitable. In such cases, a modification may be needed to update beneficiary designations, distribution terms, or trustee powers. Petitioning the court ensures changes are properly documented and enforceable. Courts will consider how the proposed changes align with the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s intent, and they may grant orders that allow trustees to manage assets in a manner consistent with new family or financial realities.
Drafting errors, omitted provisions, or clerical mistakes can have significant consequences for trust administration. When such errors are discovered, a petition can request judicial correction to reflect what the settlor intended. Evidence such as correspondence, drafts, or contemporaneous notes may support a petition by showing the settlor’s probable intent. A court-ordered correction helps ensure the trust functions as intended and that trustees and beneficiaries are protected from unintended results caused by erroneous language.
We provide local representation for Tiburon residents seeking trust modification petitions in Marin County courts. Our approach begins with a comprehensive review of trust documents and relevant estate planning materials to identify the best path forward. We work to prepare clear petitions, handle required notices, and advocate for solutions that align with the settlor’s objectives while considering beneficiary concerns. Our goal is to reduce uncertainty, limit adversarial disputes when possible, and obtain judicial orders that provide lasting clarity for trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers focused representation in estate planning, including trust modification petitions, for clients across Marin County and the surrounding Bay Area. We emphasize careful preparation of petitions and supporting declarations, thorough notice to interested parties, and measured advocacy in court. Our goal is to provide well-reasoned legal strategies that minimize conflict and produce enforceable outcomes that serve your family’s long-term interests and asset management objectives in accordance with California law.
We assist clients with a broad range of estate planning documents that commonly interact with trust modification issues, such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives. This integrated perspective helps ensure that proposed modifications fit within the client’s overall plan and address tax, Medicaid, and practical administration concerns. Clear communication and realistic guidance about timing and potential outcomes are central to our representation, allowing clients to make informed choices at every step.
Our office handles all aspects of the petition process, including drafting pleadings, coordinating service and notice, preparing declarations and exhibits, and presenting arguments at hearings when required. We work to keep clients apprised of developments and to pursue negotiated resolutions when they benefit our clients’ goals. Whether seeking minor corrections or significant revisions, our representation aims to produce durable, legally sound outcomes that clarify trustee duties and protect beneficiary interests for the long term.
Our process begins with a document review and fact-gathering phase, followed by a clear recommendation of whether to pursue informal amendment, settlement, or a court petition. If a petition is appropriate, we draft the pleadings, prepare supporting declarations and exhibits, and ensure timely service on all interested parties. We coordinate responses, manage negotiation efforts, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we provide plain-language updates so clients understand timelines, possible outcomes, and next steps for implementing any court-ordered modifications.
The first step is a detailed review of the trust, any existing amendments, related estate planning documents, and the factual circumstances prompting a change. This assessment identifies whether the settlor retains amendment powers, whether beneficiaries may consent, and whether a court petition is prudent. We evaluate evidence supporting a modification, potential objections, and the procedural requirements for filing in Marin County. This stage lays the foundation for a strategic plan tailored to the specific legal and family dynamics at issue.
Collect trust instruments, amendments, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any documents that show the settlor’s intent or demonstrate mistakes in drafting. Prepare a timeline and declarations from knowledgeable parties to support the petition. Organizing this evidence early helps streamline drafting and reduces the risk of overlooked issues. A thorough factual record also strengthens the petition by providing the court with clear context for why modification is necessary and how the proposed changes align with the settlor’s likely intentions.
During the initial consultation we discuss objectives, potential obstacles, and the likely paths forward. We evaluate whether negotiation or a settlement might achieve the same goals without court involvement, and we outline the expected timeline and costs for each option. Based on this discussion, we recommend a strategy that seeks to minimize conflict while protecting your interests. Clear expectations about the process help clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition or alternative approaches.
Once the strategy is set, we prepare the petition, supporting declarations, and all required exhibits. The filing includes clear statements of the requested changes and the factual and legal grounds for them. We also prepare proof of service documents and ensure that all interested parties receive proper notice. Timely and accurate filings help avoid procedural complications and set the stage for meaningful court consideration of the requested modification.
Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or other witnesses describe the facts supporting the petition, such as events showing changed circumstances or evidence of drafting errors. Documentary exhibits like letters, financial records, and drafts of the trust help corroborate these statements. Careful preparation of these materials is essential to present a convincing case to the court and to anticipate potential objections that opposing parties may raise during proceedings.
After filing, we ensure all required parties receive formal notice of the petition and related documents. We monitor responses and coordinate any requested continuances, meet-and-confer efforts, or settlement discussions. If objections arise, we assess their merits and evaluate possible resolutions, including negotiation or litigation. Proper notice and timely response management help preserve the integrity of the process and enable the court to proceed with a full picture of the parties’ positions.
The court may schedule hearings to consider briefs, declarations, and evidence supporting the petition. At hearings, we present legal arguments that demonstrate why the requested modification is justified and consistent with the settlor’s intent. If the court grants the petition, we prepare the final order and assist with implementing the changes, including updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and advising trustees on their duties under the revised terms. We also help clients address any follow-up compliance requirements.
Preparing for hearings involves organizing testimony, exhibits, and legal arguments so the court can efficiently evaluate the petition. We anticipate potential objections and develop responses grounded in law and fact. Clear, concise presentation to the court helps communicate the rationale for modification and the intended result. Adequate preparation increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduces the need for prolonged litigation, saving time and expense for clients and other interested parties.
If the court approves the petition, we draft the final order and assist trustees with the administrative steps needed to carry out the modification. This may include updating beneficiary records, adjusting account titles, and providing institutions with certified copies of the order and any amended trust documents. We also advise on ongoing fiduciary duties and documentation practices to ensure the revised trust is administered consistently and transparently in accordance with the court’s directions.
Certain circumstances commonly justify filing a petition, including ambiguous language in the trust, drafting errors that defeat the settlor’s intent, changed family circumstances such as births or deaths, divorce, or new financial realities that the original trust did not address. When the settlor lacks capacity to amend or when interested parties disagree about appropriate changes, the court provides a venue to secure a binding resolution. The petition should explain the factual basis and legal grounds for the requested modification and include supporting evidence that clarifies why informal amendment or settlement is not viable. The court examines the petition in light of the trust document, statutory law, and equitable considerations, weighing beneficiary interests and any objections. Evidence such as drafts, correspondence, and declarations that reflect the settlor’s intentions can be persuasive. The goal of the petition is to produce an order that resolves ambiguity or error and provides trustees with clear authority to administer the trust in a manner consistent with the court’s decision and the settlor’s probable desires.
A simple trust amendment is typically undertaken by the settlor when the trust instrument grants them the power to make changes and they are able to act. Amendments are usually private and do not involve court proceedings or public filings. By contrast, a trust modification petition is filed with the court when informal amendment is not possible, when the settlor lacks capacity, or when there are disputes among interested parties that require judicial resolution. The petition seeks a court order to change or clarify trust terms in a binding manner. Because a petition involves court oversight, it requires formal pleadings, notices to interested parties, and supporting evidence. The court’s involvement provides a public record and finality that can be important when trustees need clear legal authority to act or when beneficiaries contest changes. Choosing between amendment, settlement, and petition depends on the presence of amendment powers, the level of consensus among parties, and the nature of the issues to be resolved.
When a petition to modify a trust is filed, California procedure requires that all interested parties receive notice. This generally includes trustees, current beneficiaries, remainder beneficiaries, and any individuals or entities with a legally recognized interest in the trust. Proper service is essential so affected parties have an opportunity to object or present evidence. Failure to provide required notice can delay proceedings or result in additional court orders to correct service defects, so careful attention to who must be notified is important early in the process. In addition to those directly named in the trust, other parties such as creditors, contingent beneficiaries, or parties with related claims may need notice depending on the facts. Our practice includes a thorough review of potential interested parties and the preparation of proof-of-service documentation to demonstrate to the court that notice requirements have been satisfied, thereby helping to prevent procedural challenges that could hinder the petition’s resolution.
Yes, beneficiaries may contest a proposed modification, and the court will consider any timely objections in evaluating the petition. Beneficiaries have standing to challenge a modification that they believe harms their interests or departs from the settlor’s intent. Objections commonly focus on procedural defects, disagreements about factual assertions, or legal arguments that the requested change exceeds the court’s authority. When beneficiaries object, the proceeding becomes adversarial and the court will decide based on evidence and applicable legal standards. Because objections can prolong the process and increase costs, resolving disputes through negotiation or mediation when possible can be beneficial. If objections persist, thorough preparation of the petition and compelling supporting documentation are essential to persuade the court that the proposed modification is appropriate and consistent with the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s probable intentions.
Timelines for trust modification petitions vary based on court schedules, the complexity of the issues, and whether contested hearings are required. In Marin County, an uncontested petition may proceed more quickly, sometimes resolving within a few months if documentation is complete and all parties cooperate. Contested matters can extend for longer periods, potentially taking several months to over a year depending on discovery needs, hearing availability, and the complexity of legal questions presented to the court. Early preparation, clear evidence, and effort to resolve disputes informally can reduce delay. We provide realistic timeline estimates after reviewing the case specifics and work to expedite required filings and service. Our goal is to obtain an efficient resolution while preserving client rights and ensuring a legally sound outcome.
Yes, a court-ordered modification is generally enforceable and can help persuade financial institutions and other third parties to recognize changes in trustee authority or distribution terms. Banks and title companies typically accept certified copies of court orders and amended trust documents as proof of a trustee’s authority to act. Having a formal order minimizes institutional reluctance to honor transactions involving trust assets and provides a clear record that supports trustee actions taken pursuant to the revised terms. It is important to present properly executed and certified documents to these institutions, and sometimes additional steps such as re-titling accounts or providing updated beneficiary designations are necessary. We assist clients in the post-order implementation process, ensuring institutions receive the required documentation to reflect the court-approved modifications and to facilitate smooth administration of trust assets.
Helpful evidence includes the original trust document and any amendments, drafts that reveal the settlor’s intent, correspondence related to the trust’s creation or proposed changes, financial records showing assets at issue, and declarations from witnesses with direct knowledge of relevant facts. Documentation demonstrating mistakes in drafting or changed circumstances is particularly persuasive. Clear, organized evidence helps the court understand why modification is necessary and how the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s objectives and the trust’s purpose. Declarations that provide factual narratives and attach documentary exhibits are effective when they are concise, factual, and corroborated by independent records. A well-prepared evidentiary record reduces uncertainty for the court and increases the likelihood of a decisive ruling. We guide clients in assembling and presenting the most relevant documents to support their petition.
Mediation or negotiated settlement can be an effective option before or during trust modification proceedings, especially when parties are open to compromise and wish to avoid the cost and delay of contested litigation. Mediation allows parties to explore creative solutions that balance interests while preserving family relationships. Courts may also encourage or order mediation in some cases to facilitate resolution. Successful mediation can result in a written agreement that accomplishes the parties’ goals without a contested hearing. If mediation succeeds, it should be carefully documented so that trustees and institutions have clear direction for implementation. In cases where mediation does not resolve all issues, it may still narrow the disputes and shorten the time needed for court hearings. Our approach evaluates mediation prospects early and supports clients in negotiating durable agreements when appropriate.
Modifications can have tax and public benefits implications depending on the changes made. Certain revisions might affect estate tax planning results or eligibility for public benefits such as Medicaid, so it is important to consider these consequences before seeking relief. Courts and practitioners evaluate proposed changes with attention to potential tax consequences, creditor rights, and eligibility issues to avoid unintended financial impacts that could undermine the settlor’s objectives or beneficiary protections. When tax or benefits issues are likely, coordination with tax advisors or elder law counsel can be helpful to structure modifications in a way that preserves desired benefits or mitigates negative tax effects. We assist clients in identifying these concerns early and in consulting appropriate advisors to shape petitions that account for financial and benefits-related implications.
Costs for pursuing a petition vary based on complexity, contested issues, and court time required. Simple, uncontested matters tend to be less costly, while contested petitions with hearings and discovery require more attorney hours and court appearances, increasing expense. We provide estimates based on the specifics of a case and discuss fee structures so clients understand likely costs. Early assessment and efficient document preparation can reduce time spent and help control expenses throughout the process. We also discuss payment options and seek to achieve cost-effective solutions, including pursuing settlements or narrower requests when appropriate to limit expense. Transparent communication about fees and realistic planning are central to our approach, and we work with clients to prioritize outcomes that align with both legal objectives and budget considerations.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas