If you are considering changing the terms of a trust in Covelo or elsewhere in Mendocino County, a trust modification petition may be necessary to reflect new circumstances or correct document issues. This guide explains what a trust modification petition involves, why someone might seek one, and how the process typically proceeds in California courts. We include practical considerations about eligibility, timing, required filings, and potential outcomes. Our goal is to help you understand the options available and what to expect so you can make informed decisions about pursuing a modification to an existing trust document.
Many individuals consider modifying a trust because of life changes such as remarriage, the birth of grandchildren, changes in financial circumstances, or the discovery of ambiguous language in the original trust. In California, some adjustments can be handled informally if the trust terms permit, while others require a formal petition to the probate court. This section explains when a formal petition is likely required and the kinds of evidence and documentation courts generally review when deciding whether to approve requested changes to trust provisions or trust structure.
Updating a trust through a formal modification petition can ensure that your estate plan aligns with current intentions, legal requirements, and family dynamics. A court-approved modification provides clear authority and reduces the risk of future disputes among beneficiaries by documenting an official change in the public record. This process can resolve ambiguities, update fiduciary appointments, correct drafting errors, and address changes in tax or asset structures. For trustees and beneficiaries alike, pursuing a modification can bring clarity, prevent litigation later on, and help implement practical solutions that honor the settlor’s current wishes while complying with state law.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose, our approach to trust modification petitions emphasizes clear communication, thorough preparation, and careful attention to both legal and practical issues. We assist clients across a broad range of estate planning matters including revocable living trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and trust-related petitions. When a petition is appropriate, we work to gather supporting evidence, prepare court filings, and explain the likely timeline and possible outcomes. Our focus is on helping clients protect family relationships and financial goals while ensuring legal efforts are efficient and well-supported.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate court to change certain terms of an existing trust when informal amendment is unavailable or insufficient. Reasons for filing can include correcting drafting errors, addressing changed circumstances that frustrate the original intent, clarifying ambiguous language, or accommodating new family or financial situations. The court considers the settlor’s original intent, current circumstances, and applicable legal standards when evaluating whether the requested modifications are appropriate. This section outlines typical grounds for petitions and the kinds of supporting documentation courts look for in California.
Before filing a petition, it is often necessary to attempt resolution with interested parties and to review the trust instrument for amendment provisions. When a petition proceeds, the trustee or interested party prepares declarations, evidentiary exhibits, and a proposed order for court approval. The court may require notice to beneficiaries and possibly a hearing where parties can present arguments for and against the modification. The outcome depends on the facts presented, statutory standards, and whether the proposed changes align with the settlor’s demonstrated or reasonably inferred intentions.
A trust modification petition is a legal mechanism that allows a court to alter the terms of a trust under specific circumstances set forth by statute and case law. It is used when the settlor is no longer able to make changes directly, when the trust lacks a clear amendment clause, or when an informal modification could create ambiguity or dispute. Courts generally require clear justification for any modification, such as changed conditions that make the original terms impractical or evidence that the settlor intended a different result. Understanding the statutory framework and evidentiary standards helps people determine whether a petition is appropriate.
Key elements of a trust modification petition often include a clear statement of the requested changes, factual declarations explaining the reasons for modification, documentation of the settlor’s prior intentions, and notice to beneficiaries. The process typically starts with a review of the trust and relevant documents, drafting the petition and supporting affidavits, serving required notices, and filing with the probate court. Depending on responses from interested parties, the court may hold a hearing or grant the petition on submitted papers. Each step requires attention to procedural rules, timelines, and the evidentiary record that supports the proposed modification.
This glossary explains common legal terms used in trust modification matters so you can follow filings, court orders, and communications more confidently. Understanding terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, and trust amendment helps clarify roles and expectations. Knowing what a petition, declaration, notice, and proposed order are will also make the process less opaque. Below are concise definitions intended to help you read court documents and discussions about modification petitions without needing to interpret legal jargon on your own.
The settlor is the person who originally created the trust and set its terms. In trust modification matters, courts look to the settlor’s intent, prior actions, and any documented statements to determine whether proposed changes align with original objectives. If the settlor is alive and capable, amendments may be made directly in many cases. When the settlor lacks capacity or is deceased, interested parties may petition the court for modifications supported by evidence of the settlor’s intent or changing circumstances that make the original terms impractical or contrary to the settlor’s wishes.
A petition is the formal written request filed with the probate court asking the judge to approve a change to the trust. It must explain the reasons for the requested modification and include supporting evidence such as declarations, documents, and legal arguments. The petition informs the court and the interested parties about the proposed modification and triggers procedural steps like notice and possible hearings. Filing a petition requires attention to local court rules, accurate service on beneficiaries, and a clear presentation of facts that justify the requested relief under California law.
The trustee is the person or institution charged with managing the trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees play a central role in trust modification petitions because they often must implement court orders and may be responsible for initiating petitions when necessary. The trustee has fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests, follow the terms of the trust, and inform beneficiaries about significant trust actions. When seeking modification, a trustee must ensure proper notice and transparent documentation of reasons for the requested changes.
A beneficiary is any person or entity with an interest in the trust who stands to receive benefits under the trust’s terms. Beneficiaries must receive notice of a petition to modify the trust so they can object or consent to the proposed changes. Courts weigh beneficiary rights heavily and consider their positions when deciding whether to approve a modification. Beneficiaries may raise concerns about fairness, changed distributions, or potential harm, and the court will balance those concerns against the settlor’s intent and the reasons presented for altering the trust.
When faced with a need to change a trust, you can sometimes use an informal amendment process if the trust document permits it and all relevant parties agree. In other situations, a formal court petition is the safer and sometimes required route to ensure changes are legally binding and enforceable. Informal methods tend to be faster and less costly but carry the risk of future disputes if documentation is incomplete. Court-approved modifications provide a formal record and clearer authority but involve procedural steps, notice requirements, and potential hearings. Choosing the right path depends on the trust language and the nature of the requested change.
In situations involving straightforward clarifications, such as correcting a typographical error or updating contact information, an informal amendment can often accomplish the goal without court involvement. If all beneficiaries and the trustee agree and the trust instrument permits unilateral amendments by the settlor while alive, a written and properly executed amendment may be sufficient. This avoids court costs and the time associated with formal petitions. However, even minor changes should be documented clearly and retained with the trust records to reduce the chance of future misunderstanding or dispute among beneficiaries.
If every beneficiary and the trustee consent to a proposed change, and the trust document or state law allows nonjudicial modification, it may be possible to carry out the adjustment without filing a petition. Consent-based adjustments can be efficient if properly documented, with signed waivers or written amendments placed in the trust records. Even so, parties should consider whether the change could trigger tax consequences or affect other legal rights. Documenting consent and retaining professional guidance can help ensure the modification is durable and understood by future trustees and beneficiaries.
When the trust language is ambiguous, parties disagree about the settlor’s intent, or the requested changes involve complex asset structures, filing a court petition protects all involved by creating a formal legal record. Courts weigh multiple factors and require evidence to support modifications, so careful preparation and thorough documentation are important. Legal guidance can help identify the strongest grounds for modification, ensure proper notice to beneficiaries, and present a clear factual and legal basis for the court to approve requested changes, which reduces the risk of future challenges or uncertainty.
If the settlor is incapacitated or deceased and the trust requires adjustment to address changed circumstances or to correct drafting errors, a petition to the probate court is often necessary to obtain enforceable changes. In such circumstances, courts balance the evidence of the settlor’s prior wishes with current facts, and they may consider extrinsic evidence to determine intent. Legal assistance ensures that the petition presents clear proof, follows procedural rules, and protects beneficiaries’ rights while seeking a resolution that reflects the settlor’s likely intentions.
Pursuing a comprehensive, court-approved modification can provide legal certainty and reduce the likelihood of future disputes among beneficiaries or trustees. Court approval clarifies authority to carry out new terms and creates an enforceable record that successors and third parties can rely on. For trustees managing investments or distributions, having a court order confirming the modification can simplify administration and lower the risk of challenge. Although the process can take time, the protection it provides often outweighs the initial effort, particularly where ambiguity or contested issues exist.
Another significant benefit of a comprehensive approach is the opportunity to address related estate planning documents at the same time, such as updating pour-over wills, powers of attorney, or healthcare directives to ensure consistency across the overall plan. Coordinating revisions helps avoid contradictions that could cause confusion later. Additionally, a court-approved modification can help preserve tax planning measures and confirm the intended distribution plan for complex assets, providing peace of mind for trustees and beneficiaries who need a reliable roadmap for future administration.
Receiving a court order for a trust modification creates a formal, enforceable directive that clarity and stability to trust administration. This reduces the risk of subsequent disputes by removing ambiguity and providing judicial validation of the changed terms. Trustees can act with greater confidence, and third parties such as financial institutions are more likely to accept modifications supported by a court document. While there are costs and time involved in obtaining court approval, many clients find the protection against future litigation and uncertainty to be worth the investment.
A comprehensive modification process provides an opportunity to align trusts with related estate planning documents and to address multiple concerns in a single proceeding. By coordinating updates to wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives, a petition can produce durable changes that work together cohesively. This reduces the chance that different documents will conflict and avoids piecemeal revisions that create more questions than answers. Beneficiaries and trustees benefit from clear, consistent documentation that guides future administration and safeguards the settlor’s intentions.
Before filing a petition, assemble relevant documents such as the trust instrument, any amendments, wills, prior correspondence, and financial records showing the trust assets. Affidavits or declarations from individuals who can attest to the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances are often persuasive. Detailed documentation helps frame a clear narrative for the court and can reduce the time needed to respond to requests for additional information. Proper preparation increases the likelihood of a successful, streamlined process and reduces the potential for procedural delays or objections by beneficiaries.
While pursuing a trust modification, take the opportunity to review other estate planning documents such as powers of attorney, advance health care directives, pour-over wills, and trust certifications. Ensuring consistency among these documents minimizes the risk of conflicting instructions and helps maintain a cohesive plan for asset management and distribution. Coordinated updates can preserve tax and beneficiary intentions and provide trustees with clearer guidance. A holistic review during the modification process helps avoid piecemeal revisions that could create future complications.
People seek trust modifications for many reasons, including changes in family circumstances like marriage, divorce, births, or deaths, as well as changes in financial conditions such as new assets or altered tax considerations. Sometimes drafting errors or ambiguous language in the original trust create uncertainty and the risk of future disputes. A formal modification can correct errors, clarify intent, or reallocate assets to reflect new wishes. Understanding the specific motivation for change helps determine whether an informal amendment or a court petition is the more appropriate path forward for achieving the desired result.
Other reasons to consider a petition include updating trustee designations, addressing special needs planning, clarifying charitable gifts, or adjusting distributions to account for blended family arrangements. When the settlor’s ability to amend the trust directly is limited by incapacity or death, interested parties may pursue a petition to align trust administration with the settlor’s probable intent. In addition, changes in law or tax rules can prompt revisions to ensure the trust continues to serve its intended estate planning goals effectively and in compliance with current requirements.
Common circumstances include ambiguous provisions that invite differing interpretations, errors in beneficiary designations, newly discovered assets that were omitted, and changed family dynamics that affect distribution plans. Financial events such as the acquisition or sale of business interests or real property may necessitate adjustments to a trust to account for altered asset composition. Additionally, planning for a beneficiary with special needs or updating provisions for guardianship nominations may require formal actions to secure the intended outcomes. These are typical triggers for initiating a petition in probate court.
When trust provisions contain unclear or conflicting instructions, trustees and beneficiaries may not agree on proper administration or distribution of assets. A petition can ask the court to interpret the ambiguous terms and issue a binding determination that clarifies the settlor’s intended meaning. Submitting supporting evidence, such as contemporaneous documents or witness statements, can strengthen the presentation to the court. Judicial interpretation can prevent ongoing disputes and provide a definitive path for trustees to follow in carrying out the trust’s objectives.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or significant changes in assets often lead to a need for revising trust terms to reflect new priorities. For example, new family members may need to be added as beneficiaries or distributions adjusted to provide for dependents. Financial developments like the sale of a business or inheritance of substantial assets can change the appropriate distribution plan. A petition helps align the trust with current circumstances and ensures that administration reflects the settlor’s most recent intentions.
Drafting errors, omitted assets, or lost documents can create uncertainty in trust administration that requires judicial resolution. A petition may correct mistakes in the original instrument, incorporate missing provisions, or allow the court to admit secondary evidence when original documents are unavailable. Addressing these issues through the court process helps prevent misapplication of trust terms and provides authoritative direction for trustees. Properly documenting the reasons for modification and the supporting facts is essential to obtain a favorable and enforceable outcome.
If you live in Covelo or elsewhere in Mendocino County and need guidance about modifying a trust, we can help evaluate your situation, identify appropriate next steps, and prepare the necessary filings. Our approach focuses on understanding the facts and clarifying the legal options so you can decide whether an informal amendment or a court petition is the best route. We assist with assembling supporting documentation, providing required notice to beneficiaries, and representing clients through court procedures to achieve a clear and durable result for trust administration.
Our office combines practical knowledge of California probate and trust procedures with attention to client priorities and family dynamics. We guide clients through complex procedural requirements, ensure that necessary notices are served correctly, and prepare petitions that clearly explain the justification for modification. By anticipating potential objections and addressing evidentiary needs up front, we aim to minimize delays and reduce the chance of contested hearings. The goal is to produce a reliable, enforceable resolution that aligns with the settlor’s likely intentions and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
When handling trust matters, we value open communication and timely updates so clients understand the status of filings, required deadlines, and likely next steps. We work to present options and potential outcomes candidly and to prepare documentation that provides a persuasive factual record for the court. Our practice includes preparing complementary updates to related estate planning documents to maintain consistency and to avoid downstream conflicts. This comprehensive approach helps trustees and beneficiaries make informed decisions and navigate the petition process with greater confidence.
We also assist clients in assessing nonjudicial alternatives when they are appropriate, including negotiated resolutions among beneficiaries and trustees that can avoid court involvement. When a court petition is necessary, we prepare detailed pleadings and supporting declarations to present a clear narrative for the judge. We understand the practical concerns trustees face when administering trusts and aim to provide solutions that are legally sound and administratively workable, while prioritizing the efficient resolution of disputes and preservation of family relationships.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document, related estate planning instruments, and the facts driving the need for change. We identify whether a nonjudicial approach is viable or whether a petition to the probate court is necessary. If a petition is required, we prepare declarations, compile documentary exhibits, draft the proposed order, and coordinate notice to interested parties. Throughout the case we communicate with clients about likely timelines, potential consequences, and alternative dispute resolution options to seek an efficient and enforceable outcome that serves the settlement’s objectives.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust and related documents to determine the legal and factual basis for modification. We examine trust language, any prior amendments, beneficiary designations, and other relevant records. This stage includes identifying potential objections, evaluating the settlor’s available evidence of intent, and discussing desired outcomes with the client. Based on that review, we recommend a strategy that may involve informal resolution efforts, mediation, or preparing a court petition if judicial approval appears necessary to achieve a safe and enforceable result.
Collecting all relevant documents and witness statements is essential to building a persuasive case for modification. We help clients locate original trust documents, amendments, financial records, and correspondence that shed light on the settlor’s intentions. Affidavits or declarations from individuals who can attest to circumstances or conversations with the settlor may also strengthen the petition. Properly organizing and presenting these materials helps the court evaluate the request and can reduce the likelihood of protracted discovery or additional evidentiary hearings.
Before filing a petition, we assess whether beneficiaries and the trustee can reach an agreement that accomplishes the necessary changes without court involvement. When all interested parties consent in writing and state law allows, a nonjudicial modification can be faster and less expensive. We facilitate discussions, prepare settlement documents, and review any consents to ensure they are legally valid and comprehensively address the intended modifications. When nonjudicial resolution is not feasible, we proceed with careful preparation for a court petition.
If a petition is required, we prepare and file the necessary pleadings with the probate court and ensure statutorily required notice is provided to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties. The petition explains the requested changes and includes supporting declarations and exhibits. Proper service and timely filing are critical to avoid procedural defects that could delay resolution. After filing, the court may set a hearing or decide on the petition based on submitted papers, depending on the complexity and responses from interested parties.
Drafting a persuasive petition requires clear articulation of the factual basis for modification and careful citation to governing statutes or precedent where applicable. We prepare detailed declarations that explain the reasons for the request, attach relevant documents, and outline the proposed changes in plain language for the court to review. Including a proposed order helps expedite the judge’s consideration and provides a clear template for the relief sought. Thorough preparation reduces the chance the court will request further information or set additional hearings.
Providing proper notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties is mandated by statute and is essential for due process. We handle service procedures, track deadlines, and respond to any objections that arise. If beneficiaries object, we assess the objections and determine whether settlement discussions, supplemental evidence, or a contested hearing is the best next step. Managing responses proactively and addressing likely areas of objection up front often results in a more streamlined process and reduces the chance of prolonged litigation.
After filing and notice, the court may schedule a hearing where parties present their evidence and arguments, or it may rule on submitted documents. If the court approves the modification, it issues an order reflecting the changes, which becomes part of the estate record. The trustee is then responsible for implementing the court-approved changes, updating records, and communicating the order to financial institutions and other relevant third parties. We assist with enforcement and final administrative steps to ensure the trust administration follows the court order.
When a hearing is necessary, we prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and present the factual and legal arguments that support the requested modification. Clear presentation of the settlor’s likely intent, the factual reasons for change, and the absence of prejudice to beneficiaries are common themes that courts consider. We aim to present a concise and persuasive case built on documentary evidence and credible declarations to improve the chances of a favorable ruling at the hearing stage.
Once the court issues an order approving a modification, the trustee should update trust records, notify financial institutions, and follow the new instructions for distributions and asset management. We assist clients in implementing the order, preparing any additional documentation needed by third parties, and ensuring that all administrative steps are completed so future trustees can rely on a clear record. Proper implementation reduces the likelihood of future disputes and helps trustees carry out their duties confidently and accurately.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate court asking the judge to change certain terms of an existing trust when informal amendment is unavailable or impractical. Reasons for filing include ambiguous language, drafting errors, the settlor’s incapacity or death, or changed circumstances that make the original terms inconsistent with the settlor’s likely intent. The petition explains the requested changes and includes supporting declarations and documentation that the court uses to evaluate whether modification is appropriate under California law. Courts place weight on the settlor’s intent and the equities among beneficiaries. Before filing, parties often explore nonjudicial options where beneficiaries and trustee consent to a change. If a court petition becomes necessary, proper notice to interested parties is required and the court may hold a hearing. The timeline depends on case complexity and any objections. Preparing a clear factual record and supporting evidence helps the judge understand the rationale for modification and can improve the likelihood of a favorable outcome without prolonged litigation.
In some circumstances, beneficiaries and the trustee can agree to modify a trust without court involvement, particularly when the trust instrument or state law permits nonjudicial modifications and all interested parties provide written consent. When everyone affected by the change agrees and proper documentation is prepared and executed, this approach can be faster and less costly than a court petition. Documented consent helps protect against later disputes, but parties should ensure the process complies with statutory requirements to avoid future challenges. However, when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or when all interested parties do not agree, court intervention may be necessary to achieve an enforceable modification. A petition provides a public record and judicial authority for the change, reducing the risk of future litigation. Consulting with counsel helps determine whether a nonjudicial path is appropriate and how to document any agreement properly if that option is pursued.
Courts consider a range of evidence when reviewing a trust modification petition, including the original trust document and any amendments, contemporaneous writings, financial records, and declarations from witnesses who can speak to the settlor’s intentions. Judges evaluate whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and whether circumstances have changed in a way that justifies modification. The credibility and specificity of supporting evidence significantly affect the court’s analysis, so assembling clear documentation is important. In contested matters, the court may weigh conflicting testimony, expert opinions about legal interpretation, and documentary evidence. Demonstrating that the requested modification remedies an ambiguity or responds to genuine changed circumstances, without unfairly prejudicing beneficiaries, increases the likelihood of judicial approval. The court seeks a balanced outcome that respects the settlor’s objectives while addressing practical realities.
The time required to complete a trust modification petition varies based on factors such as the complexity of the issues, the number of interested parties, and whether objections are filed. If parties agree and the court approves on submitted papers, the process can move more quickly. When hearings are necessary and disputes arise, the matter can extend for months. Local court calendars and procedural requirements also influence timing, so scheduling can vary across counties, including in Mendocino County. Preparing a thorough petition with complete supporting documentation and proactively engaging with beneficiaries often shortens the timeline. Anticipating potential objections and addressing them in the initial filing can reduce back-and-forth with the court. Clients should plan for a process that may take several weeks to several months depending on the circumstances and any contested issues.
A trust modification can affect related estate planning documents, so a coordinated review is advisable. Documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and beneficiary designations may need updating to maintain consistency across the overall estate plan. Failing to align these instruments can create contradictory instructions that complicate administration or create conflicts among heirs or fiduciaries. Addressing related documents during the modification process reduces the risk of future disputes and ensures that the settlor’s updated intentions are reflected comprehensively. When court approval is obtained, trustees and attorneys typically revise ancillary documents and notify financial institutions and other third parties to implement the changes smoothly.
If a beneficiary objects to a proposed modification, the court will consider their objections and the supporting evidence from both sides. Objections may raise concerns about unfairness, lack of proper notice, or insufficient justification for the change. The court may schedule a hearing where each party can present testimony and documentary evidence to support their position. A contested process can extend the timeline and increase costs compared to an uncontested proceeding. When objections arise, parties sometimes reach a negotiated settlement or use mediation to resolve disputes without a full contested hearing. Otherwise, the judge decides based on the evidence and applicable legal standards. Preparing thorough documentation and addressing likely points of contention proactively often reduces the risk of prolonged litigation.
Alternatives to filing a petition include pursuing a nonjudicial modification when all interested parties consent, executing a properly drafted amendment if the settlor has capacity and the trust allows, or negotiating a settlement among beneficiaries and the trustee. Those approaches can be faster and less expensive when they are feasible and properly documented. Written consents and clear amendment instruments reduce the chance of later disputes if executed correctly and in compliance with governing law. When parties cannot agree or when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, a court petition may be the only reliable way to implement durable changes. Evaluating alternatives early in the process helps determine whether a negotiated path is realistic or whether the formality and protections of a judicial petition are necessary.
Costs for pursuing a trust modification petition vary depending on case complexity, the need for court appearances, and whether disputes arise with beneficiaries. An uncontested filing that proceeds on submitted papers is generally less expensive than a contested matter requiring multiple hearings and extensive discovery. Legal fees also depend on the time required to gather documentation, draft pleadings, and respond to objections. Each case has unique factors, so obtaining an early assessment can help estimate likely costs and potential alternatives. Many clients weigh the cost against the benefit of achieving a durable, court-approved change that reduces future litigation risk. Exploring nonjudicial options, consolidating related estate planning updates, and preparing a thorough initial filing often help control expenses by minimizing surprises and contested proceedings.
Yes, a trustee may petition the court to modify a trust when circumstances make modification appropriate and the trustee has the authority or standing to seek judicial guidance. Trustees have a duty to administer the trust in beneficiaries’ best interests and may file petitions to clarify ambiguous provisions, correct errors, or respond to changes that affect administration. The trustee must follow procedural rules for notice and serve interested parties so they have an opportunity to object or consent. When trustees initiate petitions, courts evaluate whether the requested changes align with the settlor’s intent and whether the modification is justified by the facts. Trustees should document their reasoning and gather supporting evidence to present a compelling case, keeping beneficiaries informed and minimizing disputes through transparent communication where possible.
To start the process, gather the trust documents, any related estate planning instruments, and records that explain the circumstances prompting a change. Contact an attorney for an initial review to determine whether a nonjudicial amendment is feasible or whether a formal petition to the probate court is warranted. An attorney can help evaluate evidence of the settlor’s intent, identify required parties for notice, and recommend a strategy tailored to the situation and local court practices in Mendocino County. If a petition is appropriate, the attorney will prepare pleadings, declarations, and exhibits, handle service of notice on beneficiaries, and file the petition with the court. Where possible, early communication with interested parties may lead to an agreed resolution that avoids litigation, but when disputes are likely, careful preparation improves the prospects of obtaining a clear and enforceable court order.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas