A Heggstad petition can be a vital tool when property meant to be held in a trust remains titled in a deceased grantor’s name or otherwise was not properly transferred. In Mendocino County and throughout California, families encounter delays and uncertainty when trust assets are not clearly titled. This introductory overview explains what a Heggstad petition seeks to accomplish, how it can help confirm that assets belong to a trust, and why addressing these issues proactively reduces administrative complexity and potential disputes among heirs and beneficiaries after a trustmaker has passed away.
When an asset was intended to be part of a trust but the transfer paperwork was not completed before the trustmaker died, a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s ownership of the asset. This legal procedure helps align asset title with the trustmaker’s intent, safeguards beneficiaries from delays, and limits the risk of property passing through probate unnecessarily. Families often pursue this option alongside other estate planning documents like pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and powers of attorney to create a cohesive plan for managing and distributing assets according to the trustmaker’s wishes.
Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent assets from being trapped in probate and clarify ownership for banks, title companies, and other institutions that require clear proof of authority to handle property. It provides a court-ordered declaration that an asset was intended to belong to the trust, which streamlines transfers, reconciles record issues, and reduces friction among beneficiaries. For families dealing with grief and administrative burdens, the petition offers a legal pathway to resolve title discrepancies and protect the continuity of trust administration, helping fiduciaries carry out the trustmaker’s plan efficiently and with legal recognition.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we provide practical, client-centered assistance for Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. Our team focuses on clear communication, careful document review, and representation that guides clients through each step of the petition process. We combine knowledge of California probate and trust law with an emphasis on reducing delays and avoiding contested proceedings when possible. Clients in Mendocino County and beyond rely on our steady guidance to resolve title irregularities, prepare accurate petitions, and present persuasive evidence that aligns property records with the trustmaker’s documented intentions.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial request to correct or confirm the ownership of property that was intended to be held by a trust but remains in the name of the trustmaker or otherwise is not properly titled. Courts review documentary evidence, testimony, and circumstances surrounding the transfer or attempted transfer to determine the trustmaker’s intent. This process is often used when banks, real estate title companies, or third parties require a court ruling before releasing funds or conveying property. The goal is to align titling with documented estate planning instruments without subjecting assets to unnecessary probate administration.
Not all title problems require court intervention; some can be resolved through informal corrections or by presenting a certification of trust to institutions. However, when there is ambiguity, missing documentation, or resistance from third parties, a Heggstad petition provides definitive legal authority to recognize the trust’s ownership. The petition typically includes factual declarations, copies of trust instruments, and evidence of the trustmaker’s intent. Successful petitions remove roadblocks to transferring or managing assets under the trust, and they help trustees fulfill fiduciary duties without prolonged uncertainty.
A Heggstad petition is named after a California case and functions as a formal petition to the probate court to determine whether certain property should be treated as trust property. The petition sets out the factual background, presents the trust instrument, and explains why the court should declare the asset belongs to the trust. The court considers evidence such as written instructions, the trustmaker’s actions, and relevant correspondence. If the court finds that the property was intended for the trust, it issues an order that clarifies title and authorizes the trustee to manage or transfer the asset consistent with the trust terms.
Preparing a Heggstad petition requires gathering the trust document, any drafts or prior versions, deeds, account statements, and communications that show intent. The petition must describe the asset, explain the discrepancy in title, and present declarations that support the trustmaker’s intent. After filing, the court may set a hearing, permit notice to interested parties, and review any objections. Evidence can include witness declarations and supporting documents. If the court grants the petition, the resulting order clarifies ownership and enables trustees to act, which can include transferring property into the trust or instructing institutions to recognize the trust’s authority.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process. Important phrases include trustmaker, trustee, decedent, probate, title, and order confirming trust ownership. Knowing what each term means and how it pertains to the petition will make interactions with courts and institutions more productive. This glossary provides concise definitions and practical context to help trustees, beneficiaries, and family members follow proceedings, prepare documentation, and know what to expect when seeking a court declaration that an asset belongs to a trust despite a discrepancy in the recorded title.
Trustmaker refers to the person who created and funded the trust during their lifetime. The trustee is the individual or entity charged with managing trust assets for the benefit of the trust’s beneficiaries according to the trust terms. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trustmaker is typically the decedent whose intent is at issue, and the trustee is the person seeking the court’s recognition of trust ownership for property that may still bear the trustmaker’s name. Clear identification of the trustmaker and trustee is central to the court’s evaluation of intent and authority.
An order confirming trust ownership is the court’s written decision that certain property should legally be treated as trust property. This order follows successful presentation of evidence showing the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust. Once issued, the order is presented to banks, title companies, and government agencies to effect transfers, access accounts, or change title records. The order provides trustees with the documented authority needed to administer or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust document.
Decedent denotes the person who has passed away. Probate is the court-supervised process for distributing assets when someone dies without appropriate trust arrangements or when assets are titled solely in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition can reduce reliance on probate by establishing that an asset already belonged to a trust despite its recorded title. Familiarity with these terms helps families understand whether a particular asset will be subject to probate or can be administered privately through trust processes once the court affirms trust ownership.
A certification of trust is a short, redacted document that summarizes key trust provisions without including the full trust text and is often accepted by financial institutions as proof of the trustee’s authority. While certifications can permit transfers in many cases, a Heggstad petition becomes necessary when institutions refuse to accept a certification or when the title record remains inconsistent with the trust’s ownership. Other relevant documents include pour-over wills, deeds, and account statements that together help demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent to have specific assets managed by the trust.
When assets are not properly titled in a trust, families can explore several options. Informal corrections and providing a certification of trust to institutions are often the quickest paths. If those do not resolve the issue because of missing documents or uncooperative third parties, then a Heggstad petition offers a formal court avenue to secure recognition of trust ownership. The choice depends on the level of documentation available, the willingness of institutions to accept nonjudicial evidence, and the urgency of transferring or accessing the asset. A methodical review of documents helps determine the most efficient route.
When the trust document is intact, a certification of trust is available, and banks or title companies are willing to accept the certification, informal transfer or direct retitling can resolve issues without court involvement. If deeds, account statements, and correspondence clearly show the trustmaker’s intent and institutions have established protocols for accepting trust certifications, the trustee can often proceed with administrative transfers. This route saves time and costs associated with court proceedings and usually accomplishes the necessary transfers while preserving the privacy of estate matters.
When beneficiaries and interested parties agree on the trustmaker’s intent and there are no competing claims, trustees may be able to address title problems directly with third parties. Cooperative resolution is particularly effective when the missing paperwork is minor or recent and the assets are not contested. In such circumstances, formal litigation is unnecessary and the trustee can proceed with transfers once institutions accept the evidence provided. This approach minimizes delay and expense while allowing the trustee to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities in a straightforward manner.
When title discrepancies lead to disputes among beneficiaries or when banks and title companies refuse to accept a certification of trust, judicial intervention may be the only means to secure recognition of trust ownership. A Heggstad petition provides a formal mechanism to present evidence and obtain a court order that clarifies ownership despite conflicting records. This path is appropriate when informal negotiations fail or when the legal record must be corrected to allow the trustee to manage or convey assets reliably and with legal authority recognized by third parties.
Sometimes the necessary deeds, account records, or signatures are missing or incomplete, and the circumstances around the intended transfer are ambiguous. In these cases a judicial determination can establish whether the asset should be treated as trust property. The court evaluates all evidence and issues an order based on the trustmaker’s intent and surrounding facts. This legal resolution provides clarity for trustees and institutions and helps prevent future challenges by producing a binding court determination about ownership.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust title issues combines careful document review, proactive communication with institutions, and, when necessary, the preparation and filing of a Heggstad petition. This method reduces the risk of future disputes by ensuring that all available evidence is collected and presented in an organized way. Courts and title companies are more likely to accept a well-supported petition, and trustees can move forward confidently to manage or distribute assets in line with the trust’s terms, reducing administrative delays and protecting beneficiary interests.
Comprehensive preparation also anticipates potential objections by assembling declarations, prior drafts of trust instruments, and financial records that demonstrate intent. This minimizes the likelihood of costly continuances or additional litigation. The approach fosters clear communication with beneficiaries and third parties and produces a durable resolution when formal court action is required. Ultimately, the added effort up front often leads to faster property transfers and a more predictable outcome for the trustee and beneficiaries alike, helping settle affairs efficiently and with legal authority.
By thoroughly preparing documentation and presenting a clear factual record to financial institutions or the court, trustees reduce the time required to clear title issues. Whether the matter is resolved informally or requires a court order, a methodical approach accelerates the process and decreases administrative burdens on families. Faster resolution means beneficiaries can access assets and trustees can fulfill their duties without prolonged uncertainty, allowing for timely distributions and efficient management of estate matters in accordance with the trustmaker’s intentions.
When a Heggstad petition is supported by clear documentary evidence and coherent legal argument, the resulting court order provides a durable remedy that decreases the likelihood of future claims against the asset. This legal certainty protects trustees from disputes and helps ensure beneficiaries receive their intended interests. Institutions are more comfortable acting on a court order, which streamlines transfers and reduces the risk that assets will fall back into probate because of ambiguous title, preserving the trustmaker’s overall estate planning objectives.
Collecting trust instruments, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that shows intent is one of the most important preparatory steps. Early collection reduces delays, strengthens the factual record, and helps determine whether a court petition is necessary. When documents are scattered, institutions may be reluctant to accept a certification of trust and may instead request a court order. Organizing records in advance also allows trustees to identify potential gaps and obtain missing information while memories are fresh, which can be critical to proving that an asset was intended to be part of the trust.
A Heggstad petition typically requires notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties, and there is the possibility of objections. Anticipate potential questions and prepare declarations and supporting evidence to address concerns. Clear, candid communication with beneficiaries can reduce disputes before they arise. When objections do occur, having well-documented evidence and a coherent factual narrative helps the court resolve the matter efficiently. Preparing for these contingencies in advance increases the likelihood of a favorable and durable outcome.
Consider pursuing a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust are still titled in the decedent’s name and institutions refuse to recognize the trust based on the documentation presented. Reasons often include missing deeds, unresolved title issues, or refusal by financial institutions to release funds without a court order. A petition provides a formal resolution that clarifies ownership and helps trustees access and manage assets in accordance with the trust document. This route can prevent unnecessary probate and make the administration process more efficient for all parties involved.
Another reason to file is the presence of contested claims or unclear beneficiary expectations that make informal administrative action risky. When disagreements exist or when the trustee anticipates legal pushback, a court order reduces uncertainty and shields the trustee from future liability. Filing a petition also helps in cases where title companies require judicial confirmation to proceed with transfers of real property, or when governmental agencies need a definitive ruling. The process provides authoritative clarification so trustees can carry out the trustmaker’s wishes responsibly.
Typical circumstances include real property deeds never retitled into the trust, bank or brokerage accounts still in the decedent’s name, retirement accounts with conflicting beneficiary designations, or digital assets lacking clear transfer instructions. Sometimes a last-minute funding attempt failed or a house was purchased without trust retitling. Institutions may refuse to rely on a certification of trust when documentation is incomplete. Under these conditions a Heggstad petition can establish the trust’s claim and enable trustees to proceed with administration or disposition of the asset under the trust terms.
Real estate is a frequent subject of Heggstad petitions when deeds were not updated to reflect trust ownership. This can occur after refinance, purchase, or when a deed was never executed in the trust’s name. Title companies often require an order when records reflect the decedent rather than the trust, and without such an order the trustee may be unable to sell or transfer the property. A Heggstad petition clarifies ownership so trustees can market, refinance, or distribute property according to the trust document.
Even when a trust exists, banks and investment firms sometimes refuse to transfer assets based on a certification alone, especially if prior account paperwork appears inconsistent. In these cases, account custodians may demand a court order to release funds or change registration. A Heggstad petition documents the trustmaker’s intent and can prompt institutions to honor the trust terms. Resolving these issues ensures beneficiaries receive their interests and trustees can manage the assets without further institutional resistance.
When trust documents are incomplete, lost, or have multiple drafts that differ slightly, institutions may hesitate to act without court clarification. Ambiguities in the record about which version of a provision controlled can impede transfers and management. A Heggstad petition lets the court review the totality of the evidence and determine which intent should govern the asset at issue. This legal clarity helps trustees administer the estate consistently and reduces the prospect of later litigation over disputed documents.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Talmage and throughout Mendocino County with focused assistance on trust-related title issues, including Heggstad petitions. We work with trustees and family members to assemble the necessary documentation, communicate with financial institutions and title companies, and prepare court filings when required. Our goal is to reduce delays, address institutional concerns proactively, and obtain clear legal authority for trustees to manage or transfer assets according to the trustmaker’s intentions, helping families move forward with confidence during a difficult time.
Choosing a legal representative matters when title discrepancies impede access to trust assets or threaten to involve probate. Our firm brings years of focused practice in estate planning and trust administration, and we emphasize careful fact gathering to present a persuasive record to institutions and the court. We guide trustees through gathering deeds, account statements, and relevant communications, and we prepare clear petitions that address institutional requirements. Our approach prioritizes efficient resolutions that align property title with the trustmaker’s documented intentions while minimizing unnecessary delay and expense.
We also work to maintain open communication with beneficiaries and interested parties to limit disputes and promote cooperative resolution when possible. When formal court action is necessary, our preparation focuses on presenting a cohesive narrative supported by documents and declarations. That preparation helps ensure trustees can act with legal authority and that institutions accept the orders or documentation presented. This reduces the risk of repeated requests for additional evidence and helps trustees carry out the trust’s terms promptly and reliably.
Throughout the process we explain options clearly, including the potential for informal resolution versus the need for a court filing, and we keep clients informed about expected timelines and costs. Our aim is to provide practical solutions that restore access to assets and preserve the trustmaker’s intent. Whether addressing real property deeds, bank accounts, or other titled assets, we approach each matter with thorough preparation and an emphasis on securing durable results for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Our process begins with a detailed document review to identify gaps between asset titles and the trust instrument. We then advise on immediate steps to pursue informal correction, certification, or court filing as appropriate. If a Heggstad petition is required, we draft a petition that explains the factual background, assembles supporting declarations, handles required notices, and represents the trustee in court. We coordinate with title companies and custodians to present the court order and facilitate transfers once the court issues a ruling, ensuring a smooth transition of property into trust administration.
The first step focuses on collecting trust instruments, deeds, account statements, and any related communications that show the trustmaker’s intent. We identify missing records, review prior versions of trust documents, and assemble witness declarations where helpful. This stage determines whether institutions will accept documentation or whether a petition is necessary. Thorough evidence gathering at the outset strengthens the petition and reduces the chances of follow-up evidence requests, which streamlines the court process and leads to more predictable outcomes for trustees seeking to clear title issues.
We examine the trust document and any amendments, certifications, and related estate planning papers such as pour-over wills or powers of attorney to understand the trustmaker’s intentions. Identifying consistent language and past funding attempts helps establish intent. When original trust documents are unavailable, we search for drafts, copies, or other records that reflect the trustmaker’s planning choices. This careful review provides the foundation for a petition or for informal negotiations with institutions seeking assurance about ownership and authority to manage assets.
Documentation such as recorded deeds, bank statements, and correspondence with institutions often reveals whether an asset was intended to be in the trust. We gather and organize these materials and, when necessary, obtain certified copies from public records. Correspondence with title companies or account custodians can be particularly useful to show how institutions previously treated the asset. Presenting a complete and well-organized evidentiary record increases the likelihood of a favorable resolution either with a court order or through institutional acceptance of trust ownership.
Before filing a petition, we communicate with banks, title companies, and other custodians to determine if they will accept certification or require a court order. This step can save time and expense if the institution agrees to retitle based on documentation. When institutions require additional assurances, we explain what evidence will be included in a petition and attempt to resolve outstanding concerns. These negotiations help narrow issues, clarify whether notice to parties is necessary, and reduce the scope of contested matters if a petition becomes unavoidable.
Direct outreach to institutions clarifies their internal policies and identifies any specific documentation they require to recognize trust ownership. By understanding institutional expectations, we can tailor the petition or certification to address those points and avoid unnecessary court time. Clear communication also documents the institution’s stance, which can be referenced in the petition if court intervention proves necessary. In many cases this collaborative approach leads to a nonjudicial solution that resolves title issues efficiently for trustees.
Open communication with beneficiaries and family members can prevent objections and foster cooperative resolution. We encourage trustees to explain actions and share key documents that substantiate the trustmaker’s intent. When disagreements are present, we seek to address concerns early and, if appropriate, propose mutually acceptable solutions. This proactive engagement reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and supports a smoother administration process when a Heggstad petition or other formal action becomes necessary.
If informal resolution is not possible, we prepare and file the Heggstad petition with the probate court. The petition includes a clear statement of facts, copies of the trust and supporting documents, and declarations from trustees or witnesses. We manage required notices to beneficiaries and interested parties and represent the trustee at hearings. After presenting the evidence, the court may issue an order confirming trust ownership, which trustees then present to institutions to effect transfers. Our goal is to secure a durable court determination that resolves title inconsistencies.
Preparing a strong petition involves drafting a narrative that explains the discrepancy, attaching relevant documents, and compiling declarations that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent. We ensure that legal standards and local court rules are followed so filings are complete and persuasive. Proper preparation reduces the potential for delays and additional evidentiary hearings. Once filed, we notify interested parties and respond to any procedural inquiries from the court, maintaining momentum toward a final ruling that clarifies trust ownership.
At the hearing the court reviews the submitted evidence and hears any objections from interested parties. We present the factual record in a concise and organized way, addressing institutional concerns and beneficiary questions. When the court is satisfied that the asset was intended to be trust property, it issues an order confirming trust ownership. That court order is presented to banks and title companies to effect transfers, change registration, or release funds. The order provides trustees with the legal authority needed to manage the asset in accordance with the trust document.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used to establish that certain property was intended to be part of a trust, even if the title or account registration does not reflect the trust’s ownership. It is typically needed when institutions refuse to accept a certification of trust or when documents are missing or ambiguous, and when title must be clarified before a trustee can manage, transfer, or distribute the asset. The petition identifies the asset, explains the discrepancy, and presents evidence demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent so the court can issue an order confirming ownership. Institutions like banks and title companies sometimes have rigid procedures that require a court order before changing title or releasing funds. When less formal approaches fail, the petition provides a definitive legal mechanism to align title with the trustmaker’s intent. The court’s resulting order is persuasive authority that institutions will accept, enabling trustees to proceed with administration or transfer of the asset in accordance with the trust terms and reducing the need for probate in many cases.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on factors such as the completeness of documentation, the local court’s calendar, and whether interested parties raise objections. In straightforward cases with clear evidence and no objections, the process can move relatively quickly, sometimes within a few months, including preparation, filing, notice, and hearing. In more complex matters, or when objections are raised, the process can take longer as additional discovery or hearings may be necessary before the court issues a ruling. Preparation and proactive communication with institutions and beneficiaries can shorten the timeline. Ensuring that documents are organized and that notice requirements are met reduces procedural delays. While some variation is inevitable, timely assembly of evidence and cooperative resolution efforts often lead to a more predictable schedule and minimize the need for extended litigation or repeated court appearances.
A Heggstad petition can prevent assets from going through full probate when the court recognizes that the asset was intended to belong to the trust. By obtaining a court order confirming trust ownership, trustees can often avoid probate for the particular asset at issue and administer it under the trust provisions. However, whether probate is avoided for an estate as a whole depends on the overall titling of assets and the existence of other nontrust assets that may still be subject to probate proceedings. It is also important to note that a successful petition addresses title issues for the specific asset in question. Other assets titled improperly or governed by separate legal concerns may still require probate or additional filings. A comprehensive review of the estate’s asset titling helps determine whether further action is necessary to minimize probate exposure across the entire estate plan.
Evidence commonly used to support a Heggstad petition includes the trust instrument and any amendments, deeds, account statements, prior drafts or drafts of related documents, and correspondence indicating the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from witnesses, trustees, or individuals familiar with the trustmaker’s intentions can also be persuasive. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether the asset was intended to be part of the trust despite inconsistent title records. Organizing and presenting this evidence in a clear, chronological manner helps the court assess intent and resolve the discrepancy. Certified copies of public records, notarized documents, and any communications with financial institutions that reference the trust or funding attempts reinforce the factual narrative. Thorough documentation reduces the likelihood of follow-up requests and strengthens the petition’s chance of being granted.
Notice requirements vary depending on the nature of the asset and the parties who may have an interest in it. Typically, interested parties such as beneficiaries, heirs at law, and known creditors receive notice of a Heggstad petition so they have an opportunity to respond or object. Proper notice procedures ensure due process and give the court confidence that all potentially affected parties were informed and able to raise concerns if necessary. Failure to provide adequate notice can lead to delays or the need to repeat procedural steps. Our approach includes identifying all required recipients, preparing accurate notice documents, and serving them according to court rules. Ensuring correct and timely notice reduces the risk of objections based on procedural grounds and helps move the petition toward resolution.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties can object to a Heggstad petition. Objections commonly assert competing claims to ownership, challenge the sufficiency of evidence, or raise concerns about the trustee’s actions. When objections occur, the court will consider the arguments and evidence from both sides and may schedule additional hearings or require supplemental documentation. Objections can lengthen the process and may lead to contested proceedings if not resolved through negotiation. When facing potential objections, careful preparation and transparent communication with interested parties can help narrow disputes. Presenting a well-documented petition that addresses foreseeable concerns reduces the likelihood of successful objections. If disputes persist, the court’s role is to weigh the evidence impartially and determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property based on the trustmaker’s intent and the available record.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on court fees, the complexity of evidence collection, and whether the petition is contested. Routine petitions that are uncontested and supported by clear documentation generally involve lower filing and administrative costs. When additional investigation, depositions, or contested hearings are required, legal fees and expenses increase accordingly. We provide an estimate based on the specifics of each matter and discuss ways to limit costs through focused preparation and early negotiation with institutions and interested parties. Understanding potential fees and timelines upfront helps trustees make informed decisions about whether to pursue informal resolution or file a petition. We aim to provide transparent fee estimates and to pursue the most efficient path to resolve title issues while keeping clients informed about expected costs at each stage of the process.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can address bank accounts, investment accounts, brokerage assets, and other financial holdings when their registration does not reflect trust ownership. Financial institutions sometimes require a court order before accepting a trustee’s direction or changing account registration. A successful petition provides the legal authority needed for trustees to access, manage, or transfer these financial assets in accordance with the trust’s terms. The petition should include account statements, documentation showing funding intent, and any prior correspondence with the custodian. Collecting this evidence and presenting it cohesively increases the likelihood that the court will issue an order the institution will accept, enabling trustees to manage accounts and distribute funds without further institutional resistance.
When trustees discover title discrepancies, the first step is to gather all relevant documents related to the asset and the trust. This includes deeds, account statements, trust instruments, and any communications reflecting the trustmaker’s intent. Early organization of these materials helps determine whether institutions might accept a certification of trust or whether a petition will be needed. Prompt action avoids delays and preserves evidence that supports the trustee’s position. Next, trustees should communicate with the institutions holding the assets to learn their requirements and whether informal correction is possible. If institutions indicate that they require a court order, preparing a Heggstad petition with thorough supporting evidence becomes the logical next step. Clear documentation and timely outreach increase the prospect of a swift resolution.
A Heggstad petition interacts with other estate planning documents by providing a means to enforce and align the practical titling of assets with the documented estate plan. Instruments such as pour-over wills, certification of trust, powers of attorney, and deeds often feature in the petition’s supporting evidence. The petition demonstrates how those documents reflect the trustmaker’s overall plan and helps ensure assets are administered in accordance with that plan rather than being diverted into probate. When preparing a petition, it is important to present a coherent narrative that connects the trust instrument and related documents to the asset in question. This contextual approach allows the court to see the trustmaker’s intent in the broader estate plan and to issue an order that supports the trust’s administration while honoring the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas