A general assignment of assets to a trust is an essential step when organizing a comprehensive estate plan in Mammoth Lakes. This document formally transfers ownership of specified assets into a revocable living trust so those assets are governed by the trust terms rather than passed through probate. The process helps ensure continuity of management for property, simplifies administration after incapacity or death, and can provide clear instructions for distribution. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist local clients in preparing and executing assignments that align with their overall estate plan goals while addressing California-specific requirements and practical funding considerations.
Many people assume that signing a trust alone moves assets into that trust, but actual ownership transfers are often still required. A properly drafted general assignment clarifies which assets are being moved and records the transfer consistently with trust documents. This reduces the risk of assets remaining outside the trust and subject to probate. Our approach includes reviewing titles, beneficiary designations, and account registrations to identify gaps, preparing assignment documents tailored to each asset type, and guiding clients through signing and recording steps when necessary to complete the funding process efficiently and accurately.
Funding a trust through a general assignment provides clear, centralized ownership of assets which supports streamlined management and distribution under trust terms. This clarity helps minimize administrative delays and reduces the chance that property will unintentionally remain outside of the trust and subject to probate proceedings. Funding also enables immediate successor trustee authority where that is part of the trust plan, which assists in addressing bills, taxes, and property care without court oversight. For families in Mammoth Lakes and the broader Mono County area, completing a general assignment brings greater certainty about how assets will be handled during incapacity and after death, promoting efficient estate administration and continuity for loved ones.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides practical estate planning services to individuals and families across California, including residents of Mammoth Lakes. Our attorney-led team focuses on plain-language guidance for trust funding, preparation of general assignment documents, and coordination with financial institutions and county recording offices. We emphasize thorough review of all account registrations, deeds, and beneficiary designations to detect gaps that could affect a trust’s effectiveness. Clients receive step-by-step support through signing and recording processes so that transfers are completed properly and the trust functions as intended when it is needed most.
A general assignment transfers legal title or ownership interest of specified assets into a trust and is one of several methods to fund a trust. Depending on the type of asset involved, the assignment may require additional documentation such as deeds for real property or change-of-title forms for vehicles and accounts. The assignment is typically accompanied by careful review of beneficiary designations and retirement accounts since those instruments often follow their own designation rules and may not be subject to trust transfer without specific action. Proper coordination ensures the grantor’s intent is reflected across all asset-holding documents and reduces the risk of unintended probate.
In California, some assets pass by operation of law, others by beneficiary designation, and some require affirmative title changes. Effective trust funding requires attention to detail and a systematic review of each asset category. A general assignment can be tailored to cover tangible property, certain accounts, and personal items, while deeds and account transfer forms address real estate and financial accounts respectively. Following a documented process for assignments and title changes helps maintain a clear chain of ownership and avoids common pitfalls that leave assets outside the trust despite the grantor’s intentions.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is a legal instrument by which a grantor conveys ownership rights in listed assets to the trustee of a trust. It functions as evidence of transfer and complements other documents used to fund a trust, such as deeds for real property or beneficiary change forms. The assignment typically identifies the trust, the grantor, the trustee, and the assets being transferred, and it is signed under the conditions required by California law. While it does not replace necessary title transfers for certain asset types, it serves as an important bridge to confirm the grantor’s intent and to initiate the trust funding process.
Executing a general assignment involves several steps that collectively ensure the trust is properly funded. The process begins with a full inventory of assets, followed by determination of the appropriate transfer mechanism for each asset type. Drafting the assignment requires clear identification of the trust and a precise description of assets. Signatures must be witnessed or notarized where required, and certain assignments may need to be recorded in county records, such as with real estate deeds. Coordination with banks and financial institutions to update account registrations is often part of completing the funding process and preventing future administration issues.
Understanding common terms used in trust funding helps grantors and trustees navigate the assignment process with confidence. This section defines legal and practical vocabulary that frequently appears during transfers, such as trust, grantor, trustee, revocable living trust, deed, beneficiary designation, and funding. Clear definitions reduce confusion about responsibilities and procedural steps. When clients understand these terms, they are better positioned to make informed decisions about which assets to include in a general assignment and how to address title changes or beneficiary updates to align with their estate plan goals.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement created during a grantor’s lifetime to hold property and designate instructions for management and distribution. It is revocable because the grantor retains the ability to change or revoke the trust while alive and competent. Assets placed in the trust are managed according to the trust document and can pass to named beneficiaries without probate, provided the funding process is properly completed. Revocable living trusts are commonly paired with pour-over wills and assignments to centralize estate plan administration and provide continuity if the grantor becomes incapacitated.
A certification of trust is a concise document that confirms the existence of a trust and identifies the trustee without revealing the trust’s full terms. It is often used when financial institutions require proof of the trustee’s authority to act on behalf of the trust but do not need the detailed provisions of the trust document. The certification typically includes trust name, date, grantor, and the trustee’s powers, and it may be requested when transferring accounts or holding assets in the trust’s name. Providing a certification helps streamline interactions with third parties while preserving trust confidentiality.
A pour-over will acts as a safety net to catch assets that were not transferred into the trust during the grantor’s lifetime and directs that those assets be transferred to the trust at death. While a pour-over will does not avoid probate for those assets, it ensures that any property passing through probate will ultimately be distributed according to the trust’s provisions. This document complements a trust by addressing inadvertent omissions and providing a cohesive distribution plan. Proper trust funding reduces reliance on a pour-over will, but it remains an important component of many estate plans.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California when property that the grantor intended to be part of a trust remains titled outside the trust at the time of death. The petition asks the probate court to recognize that the decedent intended those assets to be trust property and to direct distribution according to the trust terms. Filing such a petition can resolve disputes and transfer assets without opening a full probate for those items. Proper pre-death funding and documentation of intent reduce the likelihood that a Heggstad petition will be necessary.
There are multiple ways to move assets into a trust, including general assignments, deeds, change-of-title forms, and beneficiary designations. Each method has different legal and administrative requirements depending on asset type. Real property normally requires a deed recorded with the county; bank accounts may require new account registrations in the trust’s name; retirement accounts often use beneficiary designations which bypass trust ownership unless the trust is a qualified beneficiary. Comparing these options helps identify the most efficient and cost-effective path to funding while minimizing unintended consequences and administrative burdens during trust administration.
A limited funding approach may work for grantors who have only a few assets and those assets can be transferred easily with minimal paperwork. Examples include re-titling bank accounts, moving household items that have clear ownership, or assigning intangible personal property. When the inventory is straightforward and the cost of individual transfers is low, a targeted assignment strategy can accomplish funding quickly. Even in limited cases, careful documentation and confirmation that transfers were completed are important to avoid leaving assets outside the trust unexpectedly and to ensure the trust serves its intended administrative and distribution functions.
Some assets such as retirement accounts and life insurance policies pass by beneficiary designation rather than by title, so managing those instruments carefully can reduce the need for broader title transfers. If the named beneficiaries already align with trust objectives or if the grantor intends certain assets to pass outside the trust, adjusting designations can be a simple alternative to retitling. However, beneficiary designations should be reviewed for consistency with the overall estate plan because mismatched designations may override trust instructions and create distribution problems that require post-death adjustments or court involvement.
When a grantor’s estate includes a mix of real estate, retirement accounts, business interests, and jointly owned assets, a comprehensive funding approach is typically necessary. Differences in transfer rules across asset types create complexity that a coordinated plan can address, reducing the risk of leaving valuable property outside the trust. A comprehensive review identifies assets that require deeds, account retitling, or beneficiary updates and sequences necessary steps to limit tax consequences and administrative burdens. This careful coordination promotes a smoother transition for trustees and beneficiaries when trust administration begins.
Failing to fully fund a trust can result in assets going through probate, which is time-consuming and costly compared with trust administration. A comprehensive approach evaluates each asset for potential probate exposure and implements transfers or designations to prevent that outcome where appropriate. By addressing gaps in ownership titles and beneficiary designations before incapacity or death, the grantor reduces uncertainty and paperwork for successors. This planning helps preserve privacy, expedites access to resources for family needs, and minimizes the administrative delays that can arise when assets are discovered outside the trust during estate settlement.
A comprehensive trust funding strategy brings several advantages, including reduced probate exposure, clearer asset management in the event of incapacity, and predictable distribution of property to beneficiaries. Thorough funding ensures that the trustee can step in immediately and manage assets when necessary, without delay for court appointments. It also helps align account registration and beneficiary designations with the grantor’s overall intentions, preventing conflicting directives. This holistic method provides peace of mind by minimizing surprises during administration and making it easier for family members to carry out the grantor’s wishes efficiently.
In addition to administrative benefits, comprehensive funding can reduce stress and conflict among surviving family members by providing a clear, documented path for asset distribution. Properly executed assignments, deeds, and account transfers create a reliable chain of ownership and reduce the potential for disputes over what was intended to be part of the trust. A complete funding plan also allows for consideration of tax implications and creditor exposure in situations where strategic titling matters. Overall, taking a thorough approach protects the objectives of the estate plan and supports a smoother transition when the trust is administered.
One of the primary benefits of comprehensive funding is the potential to keep assets out of probate, which saves time and expense for beneficiaries. When assets are properly assigned or retitled into the trust, they can be managed and distributed according to the trust terms without court involvement. This streamlines administration, supports privacy by avoiding public probate records, and allows trustees to access resources more quickly to pay expenses and carry out distributions. For families in Mammoth Lakes and nearby areas, this can be especially helpful when immediate access to funds is needed to maintain property or cover ongoing expenses.
Comprehensively funding a trust ensures that if the grantor becomes incapacitated, the trustee can step in seamlessly to manage assets and pay bills on behalf of the trust. This continuity avoids the need for conservatorship proceedings and allows for consistent handling of financial affairs. Having clear title to assets and updated account registrations helps protect property and ensures bills are paid timely. The result is reduced disruption to daily life and a predictable arrangement for caretakers or family members who must support the grantor during periods of incapacity.
Begin the trust funding process by compiling a detailed inventory of all assets, including real property, bank and investment accounts, retirement plans, life insurance, vehicles, and personal property. Note account numbers, titles, ownership types, and beneficiary designations. A complete inventory makes it easier to identify which items require deeds, retitling, or beneficiary updates and which can be assigned through a general assignment. Taking the time to catalog assets now reduces overlooked items later and helps ensure that the trust reflects the grantor’s full estate plan, minimizing the risk of assets unintentionally remaining outside the trust and subject to probate.
Make sure beneficiary designations for retirement accounts and life insurance policies are consistent with the trust and overall plan objectives. Periodically review these designations after major life changes such as marriage, divorce, births, or deaths, because beneficiary forms generally control distribution regardless of trust provisions unless the trust is named as the beneficiary. Updating beneficiary designations when needed prevents conflicting directions and ensures assets pass in the manner the grantor intends. Keeping these documents aligned with the trust reduces the chance of surprises during estate settlement.
There are several compelling reasons to complete a general assignment as part of a broader estate planning strategy. Assignments consolidate ownership under the trust, help avoid probate for assets that are retitled, and provide a clear path for management in the event of incapacity. For property that is otherwise difficult to coordinate, the assignment serves as documented evidence of intent to transfer. Additionally, aligning asset ownership with the trust may reduce administrative burdens for family members and trustees by clarifying authority and reducing the need for court intervention during administration.
Another reason to use a general assignment is to reduce uncertainty about whether assets will be treated as trust property. Without proper transfers, assets discovered outside the trust can delay distribution and require additional legal action to resolve. A documented assignment, together with any required deeds or account updates, creates a reliable record that the grantor intended those assets to be governed by the trust terms. This approach fosters smoother transitions for trustees and beneficiaries and supports practical management of estate matters when the trust is activated.
A general assignment is often used when a grantor has personal property, accounts, or intangible assets that are not easily retitled or when there is a need to document intent to include particular items in the trust. It is also helpful where many small items exist or where ownership is currently ambiguous. People frequently execute assignments when updating an existing trust, consolidating multiple accounts, or preparing an estate plan after a major life event. The assignment helps ensure that these assets are considered part of the trust and managed under its provisions when the time comes.
When a trust is updated or restated, assets that were acquired after the original trust creation often remain titled in the grantor’s name. Executing a general assignment as part of the update helps incorporate newly acquired assets into the revised trust and maintain consistency across the overall estate plan. This step prevents unexpected probate for items acquired after the trust’s formation and ensures the updated trust governs a complete picture of the grantor’s property holdings, permitting the trustee to manage and distribute assets according to the newly stated terms.
A common circumstance is when clients obtain new assets such as a second home, valuable personal property, or accounts that were not previously included in the trust. A general assignment provides a straightforward means of documenting the intent to include these items in trust ownership, particularly for personal property that does not require a deed or separate transfer paperwork. By completing the assignment alongside any necessary retitling, grantors create a clear record of inclusion and reduce the potential for disputes or administrative complications later.
Jointly held property or assets held with rights of survivorship can create ambiguity about how those items will be treated with respect to a trust. A general assignment can help document how certain interests are intended to be handled, particularly when ownership structures change or when one owner wishes to ensure that their share becomes part of their trust. While some joint assets may pass outside the trust by operation of law, documenting intent and coordinating changes to title or ownership can reduce confusion and make it easier to administer the grantor’s estate in accordance with their wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is available to guide Mammoth Lakes residents through each step of assigning assets to a trust. We assist with preparing and reviewing assignment documents, coordinating deed recordings, and communicating with financial institutions to retitle accounts or provide required trust documentation. Our approach is practical and focused on giving clients clear options and next steps so their estate plans function as intended. Clients receive help creating a complete inventory, identifying funding gaps, and documenting transfers to support efficient trust administration when needed.
Choosing an experienced estate planning attorney ensures the steps to fund a trust are performed correctly and aligned with the client’s overall objectives. We bring a thorough, methodical approach to reviewing asset ownership, preparing assignments and deeds, and communicating with banks and title companies. Our goal is to help clients avoid common pitfalls that leave assets outside the trust and create unnecessary probate exposure. Practical guidance during the funding process gives clients confidence that their plan will operate as intended and that trustees will have the authority needed to manage trust property.
We prioritize clear communication and documentation throughout the funding process. That includes preparing concise assignment forms, submitting deeds for recording where required, and obtaining confirmations from institutions when account retitling is completed. This attention to detail helps create a verifiable record of transfers and reduces ambiguity for survivors. We also advise on secondary documents like pour-over wills or certifications of trust to ensure there are multiple layers of protection that support distribution under the trust when appropriate.
Our firm serves clients across California and is familiar with local recording practices and institutional requirements that affect trust funding. We assist with practical steps to execute assignments and follow through to completion so clients do not need to navigate unfamiliar procedures alone. By combining careful documentation with proactive coordination, we aim to make trust funding a manageable process that strengthens the overall estate plan and provides peace of mind for clients and their families.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we follow a clear process to make trust funding efficient and reliable. The process begins with a comprehensive review of assets, titles, and beneficiary designations, followed by preparation of assignment documents and any necessary deeds or account transfer forms. We assist clients with notarization, recording, and communications with institutions to confirm transfers. Documentation is kept organized so trustees and family members can quickly verify ownership changes. The goal is a well-documented funding result that supports smooth administration when a trust becomes active.
The first step is compiling a complete list of assets and reviewing the current state of ownership and beneficiary designations. This inventory identifies items that require deeds, retitling, beneficiary changes, or a general assignment. We look for conflicts or omissions that could leave assets outside the trust and prioritize actions based on complexity and the need for recording or institutional approvals. This review forms the foundation for the funding plan and informs the necessary documents and sequence of tasks to transfer assets into the trust efficiently.
Part of the initial review focuses on real estate and whether deeds need to be prepared and recorded to transfer title to the trust. We verify legal descriptions, mortgage status, and any encumbrances that could affect transfer. Preparing a deed correctly and recording it promptly avoids potential title issues later. We also advise on potential tax and lender implications and coordinate with title companies or county recorders to ensure the recording satisfies local requirements, which helps preserve clear ownership in the trust name for future administration.
The initial assessment includes a review of bank accounts, investment accounts, retirement plans, and insurance policies to determine if beneficiary designations or account registrations need adjustment. Some accounts can be retitled in the trust’s name, while others require beneficiary updates or remain payable on death to designated individuals. We prepare the necessary forms and communicate with account administrators to confirm what documentation they require. Accurate handling of these accounts prevents conflicts with the trust’s distribution plan and promotes coherent estate administration.
Once the asset inventory is complete, the next phase involves drafting the appropriate transfer documents, which may include a general assignment for personal property, deeds for real estate, and forms for account retitling. Documents are prepared to comply with California law and with attention to any institutional or county requirements. Signing often requires notarization and, for real property, recording with the county recorder. We guide clients through execution, obtaining necessary signatures and arranging for recording or submission to financial institutions to effect the transfers.
Preparing assignments and title documents requires accurate identification of each asset and the trust’s correct legal name and date. Each document is drafted to reflect the transfer intent, including any limitations or exclusions the grantor specifies. We ensure the language used will be accepted by third parties and, where necessary, include supporting documentation such as trust certifications. This careful drafting reduces the likelihood of rejection by institutions and ensures recorded deeds conform to county recording requirements for valid transfers.
Execution of transfer documents typically requires notarization and proper witnessing when needed, followed by recording with the county for deeds. We coordinate the signing process to meet formalities and then submit documents to the appropriate recording office or financial institution. After recording or acceptance by an institution, we obtain and retain copies of recorded deeds and confirmations from banks to document completion. This documentation forms part of the estate plan file and assists trustees and beneficiaries in confirming ownership down the road.
After transfers are made, the final step is confirming that retitling and recordings are complete and maintaining an organized record of those changes. We verify that institutions have updated account registrations and provide clients with copies of recorded deeds and any certification of trust documents. Ongoing maintenance includes recommending periodic reviews to ensure new assets acquired later are incorporated into the trust and beneficiary designations remain aligned with the estate plan. Regular reviews help preserve the trust’s effectiveness and reduce the likelihood of future probate proceedings.
Once transfers are processed, obtaining confirmations from banks, financial institutions, and county recorders provides tangible proof that assets were moved into the trust. We collect recorded deed copies and written acknowledgments from account administrators to include in the client’s estate planning file. These records make it easier for trustees and family members to demonstrate ownership and act on behalf of the trust when necessary. Having clear documentation minimizes confusion and supports timely administration of trust assets.
The final phase includes recommending periodic reviews so the trust remains current with life changes and new assets. Events such as purchases, sales, births, deaths, or changes in marital status can affect the alignment of account registrations and beneficiary designations with the trust. Regular check-ups help identify items that require new assignments, deed recordings, or beneficiary updates. Ongoing care preserves the benefits of the trust and makes administration more predictable for trustees and beneficiaries when the trust becomes operative.
A general assignment of assets to a trust is a document that identifies particular property or classes of property and transfers the grantor’s interest into the trust. It is often used for tangible personal property, certain accounts, or other assets that do not require a deed or specialized transfer form. The assignment provides a written record of intent to include those assets in the trust and can be an efficient way to fund items that do not have separate title documents. It complements deeds and account retitling by capturing items that might otherwise remain outside the trust. You should consider using a general assignment when you have personal property, small assets, or multiple items that would be cumbersome to transfer individually, or when you want a clear supplemental record of transfers into the trust. It is important to review each asset type to determine whether additional steps are necessary, such as recording deeds for real estate or updating account registrations, because some assets require formal title changes beyond what an assignment alone can accomplish.
Signing a trust document alone does not automatically transfer ownership of most assets into the trust. The trust is the legal framework for management and distribution, but actual ownership transfers usually require additional actions like re-titling accounts, recording deeds, or completing beneficiary designation forms. Without these steps, assets often remain in the grantor’s name and may be subject to probate at death despite the existence of a trust. To ensure the trust controls your property, conduct a thorough inventory and complete necessary transfers such as deeds for real estate and retitling for bank and brokerage accounts. This coordinated approach ensures that the trust functions as intended, allowing trustees to manage and distribute assets without court involvement and reducing the burden on loved ones after the grantor’s death.
Recording a deed is required when transferring real property to a trust in order to change public records and establish the trust as the recorded owner. For real estate, an unrecorded deed does not protect against claims or properly inform third parties of the trust’s ownership. Recording ensures the change is publicly reflected in county records and helps prevent future disputes about title. For other assets, recording may not apply, but documentation of transfer and confirmations from institutions serve a similar purpose. For personal property and financial accounts, recording is not typically required, but documentation such as account confirmations and notarized assignments is important. Ensure copies of recorded deeds and institutional confirmations are maintained in the estate planning file so trustees and beneficiaries can demonstrate that transfers were completed and there is a clear chain of ownership under the trust.
Beneficiary designations on retirement plans and life insurance policies control how those assets are distributed at death and often operate independently of a trust unless the trust is named as the beneficiary. Because beneficiary forms typically supersede testamentary documents, it is important to coordinate beneficiary designations with trust provisions to avoid unintended distributions. If the goal is to have retirement or insurance proceeds flow into the trust, the trust should be named explicitly as the beneficiary and must meet any institutional requirements. Review beneficiary forms periodically and after significant life events to confirm they remain aligned with the trust plan. In some cases, naming the trust as beneficiary may have tax and administrative implications that deserve attention, so understanding how designations interact with trust goals helps maintain consistency and prevent conflicts during estate settlement.
If an asset is left outside the trust, that property may be subject to probate or require additional steps to transfer to intended beneficiaries. An overlooked asset can cause delays, additional expense, and administrative complexity for those managing the estate. For certain assets, such as those intended to be part of the trust, a Heggstad petition or probate proceeding might become necessary to effectuate the grantor’s intended distribution. To avoid this outcome, conduct a thorough funding review and document transfers with deeds, assignments, and confirmations. If an omission is discovered later, legal avenues exist to correct the record and transfer the asset to the trust, but resolving these matters in advance is generally less burdensome and preserves the benefits of centralized trust administration.
Retirement accounts are governed by beneficiary designation rules and often cannot be retitled into a revocable living trust without careful consideration. Naming a trust as the beneficiary is a common approach if the trust is intended to receive retirement proceeds, but doing so may have tax and distribution consequences that should be evaluated. Alternatively, maintaining appropriate beneficiary designations while coordinating with the trust plan may achieve the grantor’s goals without direct retitling. Consulting about the interplay between retirement accounts and the trust helps determine the best approach for each account. Ensuring beneficiary forms are consistent with overall objectives and understanding distribution rules can minimize unintended tax consequences and administrative complexity for those who will manage proceeds after death.
To ensure a trustee can access funds quickly if the grantor becomes incapacitated, it is important to have assets properly titled in the trust and to maintain updated documentation such as account confirmations and a certification of trust. Where accounts remain in the grantor’s name, establishing a financial power of attorney can provide management authority during incapacity, but trust funding is the most direct way to grant immediate trustee control over trust assets without court involvement. Additionally, providing clear instructions and copies of essential documents to trusted family members or advisors can speed access to funds when needed. Early planning to align account registrations and to prepare transferable documents reduces delays and helps ensure that resources are available for care and household expenses during periods of incapacity.
Many financial institutions request a certification of trust as proof of the trust’s existence and to verify the trustee’s authority without requiring the full trust document. A certification typically provides the trust name, date, and trustee identity, along with a statement of the trustee’s powers. Using a certification protects privacy by omitting detailed trust provisions while satisfying third-party requirements for account administration and transfers. Not all institutions require a certification, but having one prepared expedites interactions and helps prevent unnecessary delays when retitling accounts or establishing trust-owned accounts. Providing the requested documentation promptly increases the likelihood that institutions will accept transfers without additional hurdles, smoothing the overall funding process.
A Heggstad petition may be necessary if, at the time of death, assets that the decedent intended to be included in the trust remain titled outside the trust. The petition asks a probate court to recognize the decedent’s intent and to transfer those assets to the trust for distribution according to its terms. This remedy can resolve ownership disputes and align distribution with the decedent’s documented intent, although it requires court involvement and additional time and expense compared with pre-death transfers. To minimize the need for a Heggstad petition, complete a careful funding review and document transfers clearly. If a petition becomes necessary, retaining documentation of intent and communications about the trust can support the filing and promote a favorable resolution that carries out the decedent’s intentions.
Review your trust and asset assignments periodically and after major life events such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or significant purchases. Regular reviews help ensure that newly acquired assets are incorporated and that beneficiary designations remain consistent with your overall estate plan. Establishing a routine review cadence, such as every few years or upon major changes, reduces the risk of assets falling outside the trust and needing probate later. Keeping the trust current also helps account for changes in law and institutional procedures that could affect funding. During reviews, verify recorded deeds, account registrations, and beneficiary forms, and update documents as needed so the trust continues to function effectively and reflect your current intentions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas