A trust modification petition allows a grantor or interested party to request the court to approve changes to an existing trust when circumstances or intentions have changed. In Mammoth Lakes and throughout Mono County, families and trustees pursue trust modification petitions to reflect new financial realities, address changed family dynamics, or correct drafting issues that prevent the trust from functioning as originally intended. This guide explains what a trust modification petition is, when it may be appropriate, and how the process typically unfolds in California courts, offering a clear starting point for anyone considering this legal step.
Navigating a trust modification petition can involve procedural rules, evidentiary support, and careful drafting to ensure the court understands the proposed changes and the reasons behind them. Whether the modification seeks to change distributions, update trustee powers, or fix ambiguities, preparing a persuasive petition and supporting documents helps avoid delay and reduces the chance of contested litigation. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist residents with trust-related filings, drawing on years of practice serving California clients and providing focused representation for those pursuing trust modifications in Mammoth Lakes and nearby communities.
A properly handled trust modification petition can preserve the original intent of the trust while adapting to changed circumstances, protecting assets and relationships over time. Filing a petition can clarify ambiguous terms, correct errors, or accommodate significant life events like marriage, death of a beneficiary, or major changes in asset types and values. Addressing these issues through the court process can provide legal authority for the changes and reduce later disputes among beneficiaries. For people in Mammoth Lakes, seeking the right modifications ensures that the estate plan remains functional, enforceable, and aligned with current wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California from a foundation in San Jose and accepts matters for residents of Mammoth Lakes and Mono County. The firm provides estate planning and trust administration assistance, including trust modification petitions, trust drafting, revocable living trusts, and related filings such as Heggstad petitions and trust certification. The practice emphasizes careful analysis of trust documents, clear communication with clients, and orderly preparation of court pleadings to pursue modification when needed. Clients can reach the firm by phone to discuss trust modification needs and next steps tailored to their situation.
A trust modification petition is a court filing asking a probate court to approve changes to an existing trust instrument. Reasons for seeking modification include altering distribution provisions, correcting drafting errors, removing or replacing a trustee, or addressing circumstances that make the original terms impractical. The process typically requires providing notice to interested parties, preparing declarations or evidence that justify the requested changes, and drafting proposed amended trust provisions. California law provides specific pathways for some modifications, and in other cases a judicial determination is needed to ensure the changes are valid and enforceable.
Filing a petition involves assembling the trust documents, any related wills or pour-over wills, financial records, and statements explaining why the modification is appropriate. The court will evaluate factors such as the settlor’s intent, the effect on beneficiaries, and whether the proposed changes comply with statutory requirements. In contested situations, the proceeding may include hearings where parties present evidence and testimony. For many clients, seeking professional assistance when preparing a trust modification petition increases the likelihood of a timely and appropriate court decision that supports the revised estate plan.
A trust modification petition seeks judicial approval to change the terms or administration of an existing trust in ways that may not be possible through informal agreement or trustee action alone. The petition should explain the grounds for modification, whether the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, and how the requested change serves the trust’s purpose or corrects a mistake. Courts may approve modifications to settle ambiguities, address unforeseen circumstances, or implement the settlor’s intent when records or prior actions indicate a different outcome was intended. Properly framed petitions provide the court with a clear rationale and supporting documentation.
Key elements in a trust modification petition include the original trust document, any amendments, statements of facts explaining the need for modification, and proposed new trust language for the court to adopt. Procedural steps often include giving notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties, filing the petition with the probate court, and attending a hearing where the court may request additional information. Supporting evidence can be declarations from knowledgeable witnesses, financial records showing changed circumstances, or legal argument demonstrating that the proposed modification is consistent with the settlor’s intent and California law.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the process and discuss options intelligently. Terms you will encounter include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, revocable living trust, pour-over will, Heggstad petition, certification of trust, and notices to interested persons. Each term relates to the roles or documents involved in modifying a trust and informs who must be notified or how the court will evaluate a petition. Familiarity with these concepts streamlines communication and document preparation when a trust modification petition is necessary in Mammoth Lakes or elsewhere in California.
A revocable living trust is a common estate planning tool allowing a person to hold assets in trust during life and provide for management and distribution at death. Because it is revocable, the settlor can generally change or revoke the trust while alive, and changes may sometimes be implemented outside of court when the settlor is capable. However, when the settlor’s capacity changes or the trust terms are unclear, a trust modification petition can be used to seek court approval for necessary adjustments. The revocable trust’s flexibility makes it a frequent subject of petitions to adapt to evolving circumstances.
A Heggstad petition is a type of court filing used in California to determine whether assets transferred to a trust should be treated as trust property despite technical defects in transfer documentation. When the transfer to a trust was intended but paperwork was incomplete or incorrect, a Heggstad petition asks the court to confirm that the asset belongs to the trust and should be administered accordingly. This remedy can prevent unintended distribution outcomes and may be used in conjunction with trust modification petitions when clarifying asset ownership supports the requested changes to trust administration or distributions.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets not already funded into a trust at the time of death into that trust. It acts as a safety net to catch and transfer leftover assets to the trust for administration under its terms. When trust modification is necessary, reviewing related pour-over wills ensures that testamentary provisions and trust modifications remain coordinated. The court may examine pour-over wills alongside a modification petition to ensure the overall estate plan functions harmoniously and that proposed trust changes align with testamentary intentions.
A certification of trust is a short document that confirms the existence of a trust and certain basic facts about it, such as the trustee’s authority to act, without revealing confidential trust provisions. It is often used when dealing with financial institutions or third parties that require proof of trustee authority. In the context of trust modifications, a certification can help show who has authority to seek modifications or to manage trust assets while a petition is pending. It streamlines transactions and clarifies administrative roles during the modification process.
When a problem in a trust is minor, parties sometimes pursue a limited, nonjudicial correction such as an agreement among beneficiaries or a trustee action if the trust permits. In other cases, the issues are substantive and require a formal trust modification petition in probate court. The choice depends on the nature of the defect, whether all interested parties can agree, and whether the proposed change affects material rights or distributions. A careful assessment of the trust language, the settlor’s intent, and the positions of beneficiaries determines which route is appropriate for resolving the issue.
A limited approach is often suitable when the issue is clerical in nature, such as a typographical error, incorrect reference to an asset, or a minor administrative oversight that does not change the substantive distribution or the settlor’s intent. In those situations, trustees may be able to correct records, re-title accounts, or execute a formal amendment according to the trust’s amendment clause if the settlor retained the power to amend. When all interested parties agree and the trust allows for simple corrections, a nonjudicial fix can be faster and less costly than a court petition.
A limited approach may also be appropriate when all beneficiaries and other interested parties consent to the proposed change and the trust document permits amendment by agreement. With clear and informed consent, parties can sometimes sign a formal amendment or enter a written settlement that adjusts trust terms without litigation. However, relying on unanimous agreement requires careful documentation to prevent future disputes, and in cases involving significant assets or competing interests that cannot be resolved, pursuing a formal trust modification petition through the probate court may provide a more definitive and enforceable outcome.
A comprehensive approach and court petition are often necessary when beneficiaries disagree about the proposed change or when there is uncertainty about the settlor’s original intent. In such cases, the probate court can hear evidence, evaluate competing claims, and issue an order that resolves disputes and authoritatively implements the modification. This judicial process helps prevent further litigation over the same issues and provides legal clarity for trustees and beneficiaries going forward, which can be particularly important when large assets or complex family situations are involved.
When a trust modification seeks to alter material aspects of the estate plan, such as beneficiary shares, trustee succession, or the treatment of major assets like real estate or retirement accounts, a comprehensive petition is advisable. These changes can have far-reaching tax, management, and distribution consequences that the court should review. Presenting the court with a well-prepared petition, supporting declarations, and proposed revised trust language increases the likelihood of a clear, enforceable order that reflects the intended outcome and protects the interests of beneficiaries and trustees alike.
A comprehensive trust modification petition provides finality and court approval, reducing the risk of future disputes and giving trustees clear authority to act under the modified terms. Court involvement creates a formal record of the change and resolves competing claims about the settlor’s wishes. For families and trustees in Mammoth Lakes, pursuing a formal petition can be a prudent path when changes are substantive or contested, ensuring that the updated terms are enforceable and reflect a judicial determination rather than informal agreement alone.
Another benefit of a comprehensive approach is the opportunity to address multiple related issues at once, such as correcting defective transfers, clarifying trustee powers, and updating beneficiary designations. Consolidating these matters into a single proceeding saves time and avoids piecemeal disputes. The court can also consider the broader estate plan context, including related wills, pour-over provisions, and beneficiary rights, providing a holistic resolution that protects the long-term functioning of the trust and reduces administrative uncertainty.
One key advantage of pursuing a court-approved modification is legal finality. When a probate court issues an order approving a modification, that order carries legal weight and makes it harder for dissatisfied parties to relitigate the same issues. This reduces the likelihood of repeated disputes and provides trustees and beneficiaries with dependable guidance for administration. For families managing valuable or complex estates, achieving court-confirmed modifications helps protect the estate plan’s stability and fosters smoother administration over time.
A comprehensive petition allows the court to consider the trust in the full context of the settlor’s estate plan, including related documents like pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and Heggstad petitions. Addressing asset transfer issues and trust provisions together ensures consistent outcomes and reduces the chance of conflicting instructions. Coordinated resolution is particularly beneficial when retirement accounts, deeds, or other complex assets are involved, since the court’s order can clarify how those assets should be treated under the revised trust terms.
Before filing a petition, gather every version of the trust document, including original trust instruments, amendments, related wills such as pour-over wills, account statements, deeds, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Clear documentation of asset ownership and prior transfers supports the arguments for modification and helps prevent delays. Collecting this information early enables more accurate analysis of whether a petition is necessary or whether a simpler administrative correction will suffice, and it speeds preparation of declarations and proposed revised provisions for the court.
When modifying a trust, think beyond immediate distribution changes and evaluate potential tax consequences, creditor implications, and the effect on retirement accounts and real property. Some modifications can unintentionally trigger tax events or complicate beneficiary rights if not drafted with those considerations in mind. Reviewing how proposed changes interact with deeds, beneficiary designations, and account ownership helps prevent unintended outcomes. Preparing a petition that anticipates these issues increases the chance that the court will approve a modification that works effectively in practice.
People seek trust modification petitions for many reasons, including the need to correct drafting mistakes, update trustee provisions, change distributions to reflect new family circumstances, or address errors in funding. When the settlor’s intent is unclear or a transfer was not properly completed, a petition can clarify ownership and administration. Filing a petition is often the right option when informal fixes are impractical, when interested parties disagree, or when the changes are substantial enough that court approval provides stronger, longer-lasting protection for the estate plan’s purpose.
Another common reason to pursue a petition is to resolve disputes that could otherwise lead to prolonged litigation. Court review enables presentation of evidence and a formal determination, which in turn provides a clear legal basis for trustees to act and for beneficiaries to rely on the updated terms. For residents of Mammoth Lakes concerned about family harmony and the secure administration of assets, pursuing a carefully supported modification petition helps ensure the trust functions as intended while reducing the risk of future contested proceedings.
Common circumstances prompting petitions include ambiguous wording in the trust, the settlor’s incapacity or death that reveals different intentions, omitted assets that should have been transferred into the trust, changes in family structure such as divorce or remarriage, and mistakes in beneficiary designations. Significant changes in asset types or values can also make prior trust provisions impractical. In these scenarios, a petition helps the court evaluate the appropriate remedy and issue an order that updates the trust to reflect the correct intent or practical needs.
Ambiguous language or drafting mistakes can create uncertainty that prevents trustees from acting confidently. A trust modification petition asks the court to clarify ambiguous terms, correct mistakes, or interpret provisions in a way that aligns with the settlor’s demonstrated intent. Providing declarations, prior drafts, or other evidence can show what the settlor intended, and the court can then approve the modification or interpretation that resolves the uncertainty, allowing administration to proceed without ongoing dispute.
Significant life events such as births, deaths, marriages, divorces, or substantial changes in asset values can render prior trust provisions inadequate or unfair. A petition can update distributions, trustee powers, or other terms to reflect the current reality in a way that honors the trust’s purpose. This process ensures that the estate plan addresses present needs and avoids the risk that outdated provisions lead to unintended outcomes for beneficiaries and trustees alike.
Occasionally assets intended for the trust were never properly transferred, leaving them outside the trust and subject to probate. A petition — sometimes paired with a Heggstad petition — can ask the court to recognize the settlor’s intent and treat those assets as belonging to the trust despite paperwork defects. This remedy helps preserve the overall estate plan, prevents fragmentation of asset administration, and can save the estate from protracted probate proceedings by aligning asset ownership with the expressed plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide assistance to Mammoth Lakes residents who need to pursue trust modification petitions or related trust filings. The firm can help evaluate whether a petition is required, prepare the necessary documents, notify interested parties, and present the matter to the probate court. With a practice focused on estate planning matters including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and trust administration, the office aims to help clients achieve clear, enforceable solutions that preserve their intentions and protect beneficiaries and trustees during transitions.
Choosing experienced counsel familiar with California probate procedures and trust law helps ensure a trust modification petition is framed effectively and supported with appropriate evidence. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can identify the legal basis for the requested modification, gather supporting documentation, and prepare the petition and proposed orders in a manner that addresses court expectations. Clear, organized filings reduce the chance of delay and make it easier for the court to understand the relief sought and to issue an order.
The firm assists with coordinating related documents so that trust modifications proceed in a way that aligns with the broader estate plan, including pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and trust funding issues. Handling these connections in a single process prevents inconsistent outcomes and helps ensure that asset transfers and trustee authorities are clear following the court’s decision. This coordination reduces administrative burdens on trustees and provides beneficiaries with a coherent framework for future trust administration.
Clients benefit from practical guidance about notice, timelines, and likely evidentiary needs for a successful petition. The firm can communicate with beneficiaries, prepare declarations, and present legal arguments in court hearings when necessary. Whether the matter is likely to resolve by consent or requires contested proceedings, having skilled representation focused on trust matters supports an efficient process and a well-documented result that the court can implement and enforce.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and any related estate planning documents to determine whether a petition is necessary and what remedy best serves the settlor’s intent. We then gather supporting records, draft the petition and proposed orders, and prepare declarations that explain the factual and legal basis for the change. After providing required notice, we present the petition to the probate court and respond to any questions or objections. The goal is an efficient, well-supported proceeding that yields a clear court order implementing the requested modification.
The first step involves collecting the trust documents, amendments, related wills, account statements, deeds, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. We assess whether the proposed change can be handled nonjudicially or whether a formal petition is required. This stage includes identifying interested parties who must receive notice and determining the evidence necessary to support the petition. A careful assessment at the outset helps define the strategy and estimate timeframes and potential obstacles.
Gathering complete documentation is essential for preparing a strong petition. This includes the original trust, all amendments, account statements, copies of deeds, beneficiary designations, and any records of attempted transfers. Documentation showing the settlor’s intent, such as prior drafts or correspondence, can be persuasive to the court. Identifying gaps early allows the petition to address defective transfers or to request relief such as a Heggstad determination when necessary to confirm trust ownership of assets.
After collecting documents, we determine whether a nonjudicial resolution is possible, such as a trustee amendment or signed agreement among beneficiaries, and whether that path would produce an enforceable result. When unanimity or trustee authority exists and the change is limited, the nonjudicial route can be efficient. If the matter is contentious, involves substantial assets, or raises questions of intent or funding, preparing a formal petition for court approval provides a more definitive solution with binding legal effect.
If a petition is the appropriate path, we draft the petition, supporting declarations, and proposed order, ensuring that the factual basis and requested changes are presented clearly. Properly prepared filings address notice requirements, identify interested parties, and attach or summarize material evidence. Filing schedules and local probate rules are followed to avoid procedural missteps. Clear pleading and reliable evidence increase the likelihood the court will approve the requested modification without needless delay or surprise objections.
The petition should explain the requested change and provide declarations from those with knowledge of the circumstances, such as trustees, beneficiaries, or individuals familiar with the settlor’s intent. These declarations describe facts, timelines, and evidence supporting the modification. Including proposed amended trust language or a redlined version helps the court envision the practical effect of the change. Clear, factual declarations and a coherent legal argument help the court reach an informed decision efficiently.
Once filings are prepared, we serve notice on all interested parties in accordance with California law and local court rules. Proper notice allows beneficiaries an opportunity to object or to consent, and it is a procedural requirement the court will verify. After filing, the court may schedule a hearing. We monitor the case calendar, respond to any objections, and provide further documentation as needed. Effective case management throughout this phase helps maintain momentum toward a court determination.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition and evidence, hears any objections, and may ask questions aimed at clarifying the settlor’s intent and the requested changes. If the court approves the petition, it issues an order that implements the modification; that order becomes the authoritative direction for trust administration. After entry of the order, trustees can update records, re-title assets as needed, and administer the trust under the revised terms, relying on the court’s determination to guide their actions.
During the hearing, declarations and documentary evidence are highlighted to justify the modification. If objections exist, they are addressed with facts and legal argument demonstrating why the proposed change is appropriate. The court may allow testimony from witnesses or request further briefing. A well-prepared presentation helps the court understand the settlor’s intentions, the effects of the modification, and how the proposed order will benefit the administration of the trust while protecting beneficiaries’ rights.
After the court issues an order approving the modification, trustees must implement the changes by updating trust records, notifying relevant institutions, and re-titling assets if needed. Providing the court order and a certification of trust to banks and title companies helps ensure they recognize the trustee’s revised authority. Proper implementation ensures the court’s decision has practical effect and that trustees can manage and distribute trust assets under the new terms without administrative confusion.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to approve changes to an existing trust when those changes cannot be implemented solely by the settlor or trustee under the trust’s terms. Common reasons for filing include correcting drafting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous language, updating trustee succession, or addressing transfers that were not properly completed. The petition explains the facts supporting the requested change, provides proposed revised language, and seeks an order from the court that authorizes the modification and resolves any disputes. A petition is generally needed when the trust cannot be amended by the settlor due to incapacity or death, when beneficiaries disagree, or when the change affects substantial rights or assets in a way that requires judicial review. The court examines the settlor’s intent, supporting evidence, and the effect on beneficiaries when deciding whether to grant the requested modifications. Preparing a complete petition with supporting declarations and documentary evidence improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome and helps ensure the court can enter a clear, enforceable order.
Beneficiaries can sometimes modify a trust without court involvement if the trust document allows for amendment by agreement or if all interested parties provide informed written consent. When the settlor has retained the power to amend and is capable, the settlor’s own amendment can effect the change. Consent-based modifications are appropriate for noncontroversial changes and practical when everyone impacted agrees on the terms and consequences of the amendment. However, when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or when beneficiaries do not agree, court intervention may be necessary to achieve a binding modification. In contested situations or when the proposed change affects core distribution provisions or trustee authorities, a trust modification petition filed in probate court provides a definitive resolution and reduces the risk of future disputes. The court process also ensures proper notice to interested persons and formalizes the legal basis for the change.
The time it takes to resolve a trust modification petition in California varies based on the case’s complexity, whether objections are filed, and the court’s schedule. For uncontested petitions with clear documentation and agreement among interested parties, the process can be completed in a matter of weeks to a few months, depending on local rules and court availability. Preparing a well-documented petition and serving notice correctly helps avoid procedural delays and speeds up the court’s review. If the petition is contested or requires additional evidence, hearings, or briefing, the timeline can extend significantly. Responding to objections, producing witness testimony, and complying with the court’s requests for further documentation often lengthen the process. Discussing expected timeframes with counsel early on helps set realistic expectations and assists in planning for administrative tasks such as asset re-titling that will follow a final order.
A trust modification can have tax and creditor implications depending on the nature of the changes and the assets involved. Some modifications may affect estate or income tax consequences, while others could alter how creditors can reach assets. Evaluating potential tax effects and creditor exposure before implementing a modification helps avoid unanticipated financial consequences. When tax-sensitive assets like retirement accounts or complex investments are involved, considering tax consequences alongside the legal rationale for the modification is advisable. The court will focus on whether the proposed modification is legally appropriate, but parties should also consider practical effects. Consulting with advisors about tax and creditor matters during the planning phase allows the petition to be designed in a way that minimizes negative financial outcomes. Proper drafting and coordination with related documents such as wills and beneficiary designations helps align the modification with broader financial objectives.
Courts typically require evidence that supports the requested modification, such as the original trust and amendments, account statements, deeds, correspondence reflecting the settlor’s intent, and declarations from those with personal knowledge of the facts. When the petition seeks to correct a mistake or clarify intent, prior drafts, notes, or communications may help demonstrate what the settlor intended. If a transfer was not completed, documents showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust can be persuasive. In contested matters, testimony or additional documentary evidence may be necessary to corroborate assertions in the petition. The quality and relevance of the evidence matter: clear, contemporaneous records and credible declarations reduce ambiguity and make it easier for the court to approve the requested modification. Preparing a cohesive evidentiary presentation is therefore an important part of petition preparation.
Yes. A trustee can file a petition to clarify or change trustee powers or duties when the trust document does not provide sufficient authority or when circumstances require judicial guidance. For example, a trustee may seek court approval to expand or limit powers, to resolve conflicting instructions, or to obtain direction for managing unusual assets. When trustee action is necessary to fulfill fiduciary responsibilities but the trust documents are unclear, a petition can provide the legal authority needed to proceed confidently and protect the trustee from later claims. When filing for such relief, the trustee should present detailed factual statements explaining why the court’s direction is needed, why the proposed change is consistent with the trust’s purpose, and how it will benefit the trust or its beneficiaries. The court will consider whether the requested adjustment is reasonable under the circumstances and whether proper notice and opportunity to be heard were provided to interested parties.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to treat assets as trust property even though formal transfer paperwork was defective or incomplete. When a settlor clearly intended to fund the trust but a title transfer, beneficiary designation, or account retitling was not completed properly, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the asset as part of the trust for administration purposes. This remedy helps align actual ownership with the settlor’s intent and can prevent assets from being administered outside the trust or passing through probate. In trust modification matters, a Heggstad petition is often used in tandem with a modification petition when defective transfers complicate the administration or proposed changes. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent and the circumstances of the defective transfer is key to a successful Heggstad petition, and including this issue within a broader petition can produce a comprehensive court order addressing both ownership and terms.
California probate procedures require that interested parties receive notice of a trust modification petition so they have an opportunity to object or respond. Notice typically includes beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, and other persons named in the trust or who have a financial stake. Serving notice correctly involves following statutory rules regarding how and when documents are delivered, and proof of service must be filed with the court. Proper notice preserves the petition’s validity and prevents claims that parties were unfairly excluded from the process. When parties cannot be located, the petitioner may need to request substituted service or use other methods approved by the court. When notice is given early and clearly explains the proposed changes, interested persons are better positioned to raise concerns or to agree, which often streamlines the court’s consideration of the petition. Maintaining transparent communication and complying with notice rules is therefore an important part of the process.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the matter may become contested and proceed to hearings where each side presents its evidence and arguments. The court will evaluate the objections in light of the trust document, the settlor’s intent, and applicable law. Contesting parties should prepare declarations and documentation to support their positions, and the court may solicit additional information or schedule evidentiary hearings to resolve factual disputes. Contested proceedings typically take longer and may increase costs for all involved parties. When objections arise, pursuing mediation or negotiation sometimes produces a settlement that avoids prolonged litigation. Even in contested matters, having well-organized evidence and clear legal reasoning can expedite resolution by focusing the court on the central issues. Ultimately, the court will decide whether the modification is appropriate and issue an order that governs the trust’s administration going forward.
The cost to file and pursue a trust modification petition depends on factors such as case complexity, court filing fees, the need for contested hearings, and whether additional expert advisors such as tax or valuation professionals are required. Uncontested petitions with straightforward documentation typically incur lower costs, consisting of filing fees and legal preparation time. More complex or contested matters involve additional attorney time for discovery, hearings, and potential settlement negotiations, which increases costs accordingly. Estimating total costs early in the process helps clients plan and consider alternatives such as nonjudicial amendments or negotiated resolutions. Discussing the likely scope and steps with counsel allows for a realistic assessment of costs and timelines. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can provide an initial consultation to outline potential expenses based on the specific facts of a proposed modification in Mammoth Lakes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas