A Heggstad Petition can resolve problems when assets intended to fund a trust were not properly transferred before a trustmaker’s death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we represent clients from Carmel-by-the-Sea and throughout Monterey County to address these gaps in estate plans. This introductory overview explains what a Heggstad Petition seeks to accomplish, why it may be necessary, and how the process can secure the trust’s intended distributions. If property was titled incorrectly at the time of transfer, the petition asks the court to treat those assets as if they were properly transferred, preserving the trustmaker’s intentions for beneficiaries and successors.
Pursuing a Heggstad Petition involves careful review of trust documents, asset records, and the circumstances surrounding failed transfers. We begin by identifying the property at issue, confirming the decedent’s intent through trust provisions and supporting documents, and gathering evidence that the assets were meant to be part of the trust. The legal filing asks the probate court to recognize those assets as trust property despite technical defects in title. This approach helps avoid outcomes that would distribute assets through intestacy or an unintended part of an estate plan, protecting family wishes and reducing the chance of disputes among heirs.
A Heggstad Petition safeguards the trustmaker’s plan by correcting technical errors in property transfers without upending beneficiaries’ expectations. When properly prepared and supported, the petition allows assets that were meant for the trust to be administered and distributed according to the trust document. This avoids probate administration for those particular assets and ensures that beneficiaries receive the property as intended. Additionally, resolving title defects through the courts can reduce conflicts among family members by providing a legal determination that clarifies ownership and honors the deceased’s documented intentions regarding asset distribution and management.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused estate planning and trust administration services throughout California, including Monterey County and Carmel-by-the-Sea. Our practice handles a full range of trust-related matters from initial document drafting to post-death administration, including petitions to remedy asset transfer errors. We work closely with clients to assemble title documents, trust instruments, and supporting evidence needed to present a persuasive case to the court. Our goal is to resolve matters efficiently and with as little disruption to beneficiaries as possible, drawing on practical experience with California trust and probate procedures to guide every step of the process.
A Heggstad Petition is used when property that should have been transferred to a trust was never retitled or formally completed prior to the trustmaker’s death. The petition asks the probate court to declare that the trustmaker’s intent was to place the asset into the trust, and to order that it be treated as trust property. Key elements include demonstrating the decedent’s clear intent, showing efforts made to effect the transfer, and presenting documentation that links the asset to the trust plan. This legal remedy keeps the asset under trust administration and aligns final distributions with the trust document rather than intestacy or a different estate plan route.
The process typically begins with a thorough review of trust documents, deeds, account statements, and correspondence that demonstrate intent. Evidence may include trustee or settlor instructions, draft transfer documents, beneficiary designations, and other records. After preparing the petition and supporting declarations, the petition is filed in the appropriate superior court, followed by notice to interested parties. A court hearing may be required to evaluate the evidence and any objections. If successful, the court’s order clarifies title and allows the trustee to administer or distribute the asset according to the trust terms, reducing the need for separate probate proceedings.
A Heggstad Petition is a specific petition filed in probate court asking the court to declare that certain assets, though not properly retitled, belong to a trust because that was the decedent’s clear intent. It provides a legal mechanism to correct omissions and align the practical ownership of property with the trust’s terms. The petition focuses on intent, documentation of attempted transfers, and any surrounding circumstances showing the asset was meant to fund the trust. When granted, the court order provides the clarity necessary for trustees to manage and distribute the assets in keeping with the trustmaker’s wishes.
Successful Heggstad petitions generally require careful assembly of records that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and actions taken toward transfer. Important components include the original trust instrument, any draft transfer documents, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, account statements showing intended funding, and declarations from witnesses or legal advisors. The petition filing must explain why title was not changed, the steps taken to remedy it, and how the court’s declaration will honor the trustmaker’s wishes. Proper notice to heirs and interested parties and readiness to address objections are also essential parts of the process to secure a favorable judicial determination.
This glossary explains terms you may encounter during a Heggstad Petition. Understanding these definitions helps you follow the petition process and communicates clearly with counsel, trustees, and the court. Terms covered include trust funding, title transfer, settlor or trustmaker intent, probate court declarations, and related procedural concepts. Knowing these phrases and how they apply in practice will help clients and family members recognize documentation that supports a petition and understand the significance of court orders that confirm trust ownership of disputed assets.
Trust funding refers to the process of moving assets into a trust so that the trustee can manage and distribute them according to the trust document. Funding may require retitling real property, changing account ownership or beneficiary designations, or transferring contracts and certificates. If funding is incomplete at the time of the trustmaker’s death, a Heggstad Petition may be used to reflect the trustmaker’s intent and treat specific assets as trust property. Proper documentation of attempted funding, including transfer forms and communications, supports the petition.
A court declaration in the context of a Heggstad Petition is the probate court’s formal determination that particular assets should be considered part of the trust despite technical defects in titling. This judicial declaration clarifies ownership for trustees and third parties and enables the trust to administer or distribute the assets under the trust’s terms. The declaration is based on evidence of the trustmaker’s intent, any transfer efforts, and relevant legal standards applied by the court.
Settlor intent describes the trustmaker’s clear intention that certain assets be held and managed by the trust. Demonstrating intent is central to a Heggstad Petition; evidence can include the trust instrument, draft transfers, correspondence, and witness declarations. Courts examine surrounding circumstances and documentation to determine whether the asset belonged to the trustmaker’s plan, and whether the omission in title was accidental or administrative, rather than reflective of a deliberate change of plan.
Notice to interested parties means providing legally required information about the petition to heirs, beneficiaries, and others who may have an interest in the outcome. Proper notice ensures transparency and gives affected parties an opportunity to object or present additional evidence at the court hearing. Failing to provide appropriate notice can delay proceedings or affect the court’s ability to issue a final declaration regarding the disputed assets.
When assets intended for a trust are not properly transferred, several legal options may be available, including filing a Heggstad Petition, pursuing full probate administration, or negotiating a settlement among heirs. A Heggstad Petition aims to preserve the trustmaker’s plan by obtaining a court declaration that the assets belong to the trust. Probate can be lengthier and subject assets to different distribution rules, while negotiated solutions depend on family agreement. Choosing the right path depends on the strength of documentary proof, the number of interested parties, and whether swift resolution or minimizing court involvement is preferred.
A limited approach may be appropriate when records clearly show the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust and potential heirs agree on that intent. If the title defect was a technical omission and interested parties are cooperative, the parties may be able to file a short, uncontested petition or submit joint documentation to clear title without prolonged litigation. In those cases, focused filings and mutual cooperation can reduce legal fees and speed resolution while ensuring the trustee can proceed to administer or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms.
When the disputed asset is of modest value and the problem stems from an administrative mistake, family members may opt for a straightforward correction rather than complex court proceedings. For example, simple retitling with a declaration signed by heirs or a short declaration submitted to the court may be enough if there are no competing claims. This approach helps minimize conflict and cost, while addressing the practical need to align asset ownership with the trustmaker’s known intentions and allowing the trustee to manage the property efficiently.
A comprehensive legal approach is often required when there are competing claims to the asset or when title and ownership involve multiple parties, lenders, or unclear documentation. In such circumstances the court may need to weigh evidence and issue a binding declaration to resolve disputes. Thorough legal work ensures that petitions are supported by strong records and witness declarations, that all interested parties receive proper notice, and that anticipated defenses or objections are addressed. This reduces the chance of later litigation or re-litigation over the same assets.
When the asset in question has substantial value or when the trust includes complex distribution provisions, seeking a full Heggstad Petition with comprehensive preparation becomes important to protect beneficiaries and the trustee. High-value assets may attract objections, and complex trust language can require careful legal interpretation. A complete approach includes detailed document review, title examination, and preparation for contested hearings, thereby ensuring the court’s order will withstand scrutiny and enable trustees to administer the trust as intended without later challenges.
Taking a comprehensive approach to a Heggstad Petition provides clarity and finality for trust administration. It ensures that evidence is carefully gathered and presented, that notice requirements are met, and that potential objections are anticipated and addressed. This thoroughness reduces the risk of future disputes over the same property and supports a durable court order. For trustees and beneficiaries, a robust petition means assets are properly recognized as trust property, enabling timely management and distribution consistent with the trustmaker’s intentions while minimizing administrative uncertainty.
A full-service approach also helps preserve family relationships by providing an impartial judicial determination rather than leaving contentious issues unresolved. When documentation is incomplete or contested, the court’s role in evaluating evidence can defuse disagreements and produce a clear path forward. This level of preparation is particularly important when creditors, lienholders, or complex ownership histories are involved, as it gives trustees the legal foundation needed to handle third-party claims and to administer assets without ongoing title challenges.
One key benefit of a comprehensive Heggstad Petition is securing a court order that clarifies title and reduces the risk of future claims by heirs or creditors. With a judicial determination, trustees can proceed with confidence to manage or distribute assets as the trust directs. This clarity prevents the same issue from resurfacing later and provides third parties, such as financial institutions or buyers, with the legal assurance they require to transmute or transfer assets. Ultimately, this reduces administrative burden and potential litigation for the trust and its beneficiaries.
A thorough petition supports efficient trust administration by ensuring assets are recognized under the trust and distributed according to the trustmaker’s documented wishes. This alignment prevents assets from being diverted into probate or other unintended distribution routes. By documenting the trustmaker’s intent and the history of attempted transfers, the court helps preserve the overall estate plan, allowing trustees to carry out duties without repeated challenges. This efficiency benefits beneficiaries by reducing delays, legal uncertainty, and the administrative overhead associated with contested asset transfers.
Begin by collecting all documents that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and the steps taken to fund the trust. Important items include the original trust instrument, deeds, bank or brokerage statements, beneficiary designation forms, and any draft transfer paperwork. Correspondence with financial institutions, drafts prepared by attorneys, or notes reflecting the trustmaker’s instructions can be persuasive. Early and organized documentation reduces delays, supports a stronger petition, and makes it easier to identify gaps that may need declarations or additional evidence to satisfy the court.
Anticipate common objections by preparing declarations from witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances of attempted transfers. Declarations may come from family members, trustees, or professionals who assisted the trustmaker with planning. Detailed, factual declarations that reference specific documents and events strengthen the petition. Structuring evidence to address chain-of-title questions, timing of documents, and the reasons transfers were not completed helps the court evaluate the petition and can reduce the likelihood of a contested hearing.
Consider a Heggstad Petition when assets that clearly were intended to fund a trust remain in the decedent’s individual name or otherwise were not formally transferred. The petition is appropriate when there is documentary or circumstantial evidence of intent and when title defects threaten the trustmaker’s distribution plan. It is also useful when immediate clarification is needed to enable a trustee to administer the asset, avoid probate for that property, or resolve disputes among beneficiaries about ownership. Early assessment helps determine whether a petition or another approach is the most effective remedy.
You should also weigh a Heggstad Petition when heirs question distribution paths or when third parties, such as financial institutions, require legal clarification of ownership before releasing assets. The petition provides a clear judicial outcome that allows trustees to proceed. If there are liens, mortgages, or competing claims, a court determination can set priorities and clarify responsibilities. Discussing the situation promptly with counsel experienced in trust administration and litigation strategy helps decide the best course to protect the trustmaker’s wishes while managing cost and potential conflict.
Common scenarios include deeds left in the decedent’s name despite trust language intending the property to be in trust, bank accounts not retitled, or retirement plan beneficiary designations that were never updated. Administrative oversights, timing issues when transfers coincided with declining capacity, or a trustmaker’s reliance on professional advisors who did not complete transfers can all create the need for a petition. A Heggstad Petition addresses these situations by having the court confirm that those assets should be treated as trust property, thereby ensuring distributions follow the trust document.
One frequent circumstance involves real estate that remains in the deceased’s personal name even though the trust directs that the property be held in trust. This can happen when a deed was prepared but not recorded, or when the transfer process was interrupted. A Heggstad Petition can ask the court to declare the property as trust property based on evidence of intent and incomplete transfer efforts. Resolving the title issue in court allows the trustee to manage or distribute the property consistent with the trust without separate probate proceedings for that parcel.
Another common issue arises when bank or investment accounts were intended to be owned by the trust but remained titled in the decedent’s name or lacked updated payable-on-death or transfer-on-death designations. Financial institutions often require a court order or satisfactory paperwork to accept a trustee’s authority. A Heggstad Petition, supported by statements, correspondence, and trust language, can secure a court declaration that permits the trustee to access and manage those accounts for the benefit of the trust beneficiaries.
Transfers interrupted by sudden illness, incapacity, or other timing issues are common scenarios that lead to Heggstad Petitions. When the trustmaker intended to move assets but could not complete steps before death, the resulting title defects may be repairable through a court declaration. Evidence such as draft documents, appointment letters, or communications with advisors can help demonstrate intent. The court’s ruling then allows the trustee to treat the asset as trust property, honoring the trustmaker’s plan even though administrative steps were left unfinished.
Our firm serves Carmel-by-the-Sea and the surrounding Monterey County area, offering legal services to address trust funding problems and related post-death administration needs. If you face a title defect or assets that were not properly transferred to a trust, we can evaluate the documentation, explain available remedies, and file the appropriate petition when court involvement is necessary. We focus on practical solutions that protect the trustmaker’s wishes and provide clear next steps for trustees and beneficiaries to obtain the legal clarity needed to move forward with administration or distributions.
Our practice emphasizes careful preparation and client communication when handling petitions that affect trust administration. We take the time to review trust documents, title records, and supporting evidence to build a persuasive filing that addresses foreseeable objections. This detail-oriented approach helps present a clear narrative to the court about the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances of any incomplete transfers. We also guide trustees through required notices and court procedures so they can fulfill fiduciary duties while protecting beneficiary interests and minimizing delay.
We understand the practical importance of obtaining a definitive court declaration to enable trustees to act with confidence. Our attorneys coordinate with title companies, financial institutions, and other professionals as needed to assemble the record and resolve technical issues. We strive to keep clients informed at each stage, explain likely timelines, and recommend efficient means of resolving disputes where possible. That practical orientation supports quicker resolution and reduces unnecessary legal expense while ensuring the legal basis for treating assets as trust property is sound.
Clients benefit from clear written guidance about options and potential outcomes, including an honest assessment of the strengths and risks associated with filing a petition. We aim to preserve family relationships where possible by encouraging cooperation, while remaining prepared to protect the trustmaker’s plan through court action when required. From initial assessment through court filings and orders, our focus is on obtaining effective legal results that align with the client’s objectives and provide trustees the authority they need to carry out the trustmaker’s wishes.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to determine whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate. We identify the assets at issue, collect trust documents and transfer evidence, and assess potential interested parties. If a petition is warranted, we prepare declarations and supporting exhibits, ensure proper notice to heirs and beneficiaries, and file the petition in the appropriate probate court. We then represent the trustee in hearings and negotiations, aiming for a resolution that confirms trust ownership and allows the trustee to administer or distribute the assets in accordance with the trust terms.
The first step is assembling and reviewing all relevant documentation to determine the strength of a petition. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, communications showing intent, and any draft transfer paperwork. We evaluate how the asset was intended to be funded and whether the available evidence supports a claim that the asset belongs to the trust. This assessment also considers potential interested parties and the likely need for declarations or supplemental evidence to present a persuasive case to the court.
Collecting accurate trust and title records is essential. We gather the trust document, recorded deeds, account statements, transfer forms, and correspondence that suggests the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Where documents are missing, we identify alternative evidence such as drafts, emails, or declarations from third parties who can attest to the trustmaker’s actions. A complete record strengthens the petition and clarifies the timeline of attempted transfers, helping the court understand why a declaration is appropriate despite defective titling.
We identify heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties who must receive notice and who may object to the petition. Evaluating likely objections helps shape the petition’s narrative and the evidence presented to the court. Where possible, we attempt to resolve disputes through communication and negotiation, but we also prepare litigation-ready filings to address objections. Understanding stakeholder perspectives in advance reduces surprises at hearing and helps the court see a well-supported basis for declaring the asset part of the trust.
Once evidence has been compiled, we prepare and file the Heggstad Petition with the appropriate probate court. The filing includes detailed declarations, supporting exhibits, and a proposed order. We then serve notice on all required parties, ensuring compliance with court rules and statutory timelines. Providing clear notice and robust supporting materials increases the likelihood of an uncontested resolution, but we remain ready to address objections that may arise after parties review the filing and supporting evidence.
Declarations and exhibits translate factual circumstances into the record the court will evaluate. We prepare factual declarations from trustees, witnesses, and professionals that describe drafting efforts, transfer attempts, and the trustmaker’s intent. Exhibits may include copies of trust pages, deed drafts, bank statements, and correspondence. Together these materials present a coherent factual narrative that explains why title is defective and why the court should enter an order treating the asset as trust property.
After filing, we serve notice to all interested parties and respond to any inquiries or information requests. Serving correct notice avoids procedural defects that could delay proceedings. We also engage with parties who may be receptive to resolving the matter without contested hearing, seeking stipulations or agreed orders when appropriate. When objections are raised, we evaluate their basis and prepare responses to keep the process moving toward a judicial determination or negotiated resolution that protects the trustmaker’s plan.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence, address objections, and advocate for a declaration that the asset is trust property. The hearing provides the court with an opportunity to assess credibility and evidence. If the petition is granted, the court issues an order that clarifies title and permits the trustee to administer or distribute the asset pursuant to the trust terms. Following the order, we assist with implementing the court’s directives and communicating the outcome to relevant institutions to complete title corrections and asset transfers.
At hearing, testimony and declarations explain the trustmaker’s intent and the context of transfer attempts. We rely on factual statements tied to concrete documents to support the requested declaration. Addressing questions from the judge and responding to objections from other parties requires careful preparation and clear presentation. The objective is to obtain a reasoned order that validates treating the asset as trust property and provides a definitive basis for trustee action following the hearing.
After a favorable order, we work to implement the court’s directives by coordinating with title companies, banks, and other institutions to update records and transfer ownership where required. This may include recording documents, requesting account changes, or filing additional paperwork with third parties. Our role is to ensure the court’s decision is translated into practical changes in title and account control so that the trustee can manage and distribute assets as the trust directs without ongoing legal obstacles.
A Heggstad Petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to declare certain assets as belonging to a trust even though formal title transfer was not completed prior to the trustmaker’s death. It is used when documentation or circumstances indicate the settlor intended the asset to fund the trust, but the asset remains titled in the individual name or otherwise not properly transferred. The petition presents evidence of intent and explains why the court should recognize the asset as trust property, enabling the trustee to manage and distribute it according to the trust instrument. The petition process typically requires gathering trust documents, transfer drafts, account statements, and declarations from witnesses who can corroborate intent. After filing, the court will require notice to interested parties and may schedule a hearing to evaluate the evidence and any objections. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order that clarifies title and allows the trustee to proceed with administration or distribution under the trust’s terms.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition varies with the complexity of the case and whether objections are raised. Preparing the petition can take several weeks to gather documents, prepare declarations, and ensure proper notice. Once filed, statutory notice periods and court scheduling typically add weeks or months to the process. If the matter is uncontested and the court’s calendar permits, a resolution can be reached more quickly, but contested cases will take longer due to briefing, hearings, and potential continuances. Factors affecting timing include the number of interested parties, the clarity of supporting evidence, and the court’s docket. Where title issues involve third-party institutions, additional time may be required to coordinate records. Early organization of documents and proactive communication with potential interested parties can help streamline the timeline and reduce delays in obtaining a judicial declaration.
Persuasive evidence for a Heggstad Petition includes the trust instrument showing the intended disposition of assets, draft deeds or transfer forms, financial account statements indicating funding intentions, and correspondence or notes reflecting the trustmaker’s wishes. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who assisted with planning can corroborate that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. A coherent record that ties the asset to the trust and demonstrates efforts to transfer it strengthens the petition. Documentation that explains why title was not changed is also important, such as evidence of administrative oversight, illness, or other interruptions that prevented completion of transfers. The court evaluates the totality of the circumstances, so organizing the narrative and connecting each piece of evidence to the trustmaker’s intent helps the court reach a clear conclusion about ownership and proper disposition under the trust.
A court hearing is often part of the Heggstad Petition process, especially when interested parties may object or when the court requests oral argument to assess evidence and credibility. In uncontested matters, the petition may be resolved with written filings and a court order on the papers, but a hearing can still be scheduled. Being prepared to present declarations and respond to questions helps the court see that the requested declaration aligns with the trustmaker’s intent and the available evidence. When objections are raised, the hearing becomes an opportunity for both sides to present evidence and legal arguments. Courts expect clear, factual records, and presenting a well-prepared case at hearing increases the likelihood of a definitive order. Whether or not a hearing occurs, complying with notice requirements and preparing supporting materials remain essential parts of the process.
Yes. When the court grants a Heggstad Petition, it may declare the disputed asset to be part of the trust, which allows the trustee to administer or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms rather than through probate. This targeted approach can prevent the specific asset from passing through probate, aligning the outcome with the trustmaker’s plan and reducing the portion of the estate subject to public probate administration. The result depends on the court’s findings and the quality of the evidence presented. However, a Heggstad Petition addresses only the assets identified in the petition; other property not properly titled may still require separate action. Careful review of all assets and timely filings help maximize the benefits of trust administration and minimize the need for broader probate proceedings for those items intended to be in trust.
Notice must be provided to heirs, beneficiaries, and any other parties with a legal interest in the asset, consistent with probate rules and local court requirements. Proper service ensures that interested parties have the opportunity to object and participate in the process. Failure to provide adequate notice can result in delays or procedural challenges that may affect the court’s ability to issue a final declaration regarding trust ownership. Identifying the correct list of interested parties is a key step in petition preparation. This includes named beneficiaries, surviving spouses, heirs-at-law, and anyone else who could claim an interest. Where necessary, we assist in compiling this list and ensuring notice is provided in a manner that complies with court rules to keep the process on track.
If an interested party objects, the court will consider the objection alongside the petition and supporting evidence. Objections may raise factual disputes about intent, challenge the sufficiency of documentation, or allege competing ownership claims. The petitioner must then present additional evidence or argument to address those concerns and demonstrate why the court should still declare the asset part of the trust. Resolution may occur through settlement, stipulation, or a contested hearing where the court resolves the dispute. Preparing for possible objections includes anticipating common lines of challenge and assembling corroborating declarations, documentary proof, and legal argument to support the petition. Effective preparation increases the likelihood of persuading the court that the trustmaker intended the asset to fund the trust and that the court’s declaration is warranted despite disagreements among interested parties.
Alternatives to a Heggstad Petition include voluntary agreements among heirs to recognize trust ownership, correcting title informally when all parties and third parties cooperate, or pursuing probate administration where appropriate. Negotiation and settlement can be efficient when parties agree on intent and disposition, avoiding court proceedings. However, informal solutions require cooperation and may not provide the same level of legal finality as a court order, particularly where third parties such as banks require judicial confirmation of trustee authority. In some cases, filing a petition in conjunction with efforts to negotiate a settlement can be a strategic option. The court filing provides leverage and a legal framework if negotiations fail, while settlement can save time and expense if parties are willing to cooperate. Deciding among alternatives depends on the specific facts, the strength of documentation, and the willingness of interested parties to resolve matters without formal litigation.
The court will grant a Heggstad Petition when the evidence demonstrates the trustmaker’s clear intent and there is a satisfactory explanation for the defective title. While strong proof of intent and documentation increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome, the court evaluates each case on its facts. If evidence is ambiguous or competing claims carry weight, the court may deny the petition or require further proceedings to resolve contested issues. Courts assess credibility, the totality of circumstances, and statutory or case law standards in making their determination. Preparing a thorough record that ties the asset to the trust and addresses potential counterarguments gives the court the best opportunity to issue a declaration aligning ownership with the trustmaker’s documented plan.
After a petition is granted, the trustee must follow the court’s order to correct title and implement the decision with relevant third parties. This often involves recording documents, presenting the order to banks or brokerage firms, and coordinating with title companies to update public records. Ensuring the order is properly formatted and recorded helps third parties accept the trustee’s authority and complete transfers or account changes without further delay. We assist trustees in translating the court’s order into practical steps: preparing paperwork for recording, sending certified copies to financial institutions, and confirming that account registrations reflect the trust’s ownership. These actions complete the legal process and allow trustees to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust instrument with the legal clarity provided by the court order.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas