A Heggstad Petition is a legal tool used in California to transfer property into a trust when documentation shows a decedent intended the property to be held in trust but the transfer was not completed before death. For residents of Pacific Grove and Monterey County, pursuing a Heggstad Petition can avoid the full probate process for specific assets by proving the decedent’s intent and demonstrating that the trust should receive the property. This guide explains what a Heggstad Petition involves, typical evidentiary needs, common outcomes, and how local estate planning practices interact with Monterey County courts and procedures.
When a decedent left instructions or steps taken toward placing property into a revocable living trust but the asset was never formally retitled, beneficiaries or trustees may seek a Heggstad Petition in California courts. The petition asks the court to find that the asset belonged to the trust based on the decedent’s actions, statements, or documents. For many families in Pacific Grove, this can be a faster, more direct way to transfer assets without full probate administration. The process still involves legal filings, potential hearings, and supporting evidence showing the settlor’s intent and steps toward trust funding.
A successful Heggstad Petition can streamline asset transfer, reduce time in court, and preserve estate value by avoiding additional probate procedures for particular assets. It provides a judicial pathway to honor the decedent’s apparent intent, allowing trustees to manage or distribute property according to the trust terms. For families in Pacific Grove, this can mean more privacy, lower administrative costs, and a clearer route to accessing funds or real property when retitling was incomplete. The petition also creates a recorded court determination that can prevent later ownership disputes and allow trustees to proceed with trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has represented clients across the Bay Area and Monterey County on estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad Petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust documents, wills, deeds, account records, and communications that show intent to fund a trust. We work to present clear, organized evidence to local courts and coordinate with trustees and beneficiaries to move matters forward efficiently. We strive to provide practical guidance throughout the filing, hearing, and post-judgment recording stages while keeping families informed of likely timelines and outcomes.
A Heggstad Petition asks the court to declare that property should be treated as trust property despite not being formally transferred before death. California law allows such petitions when there is sufficient evidence that the decedent intended the trust to own the asset. Evidence can include the trust document itself, deeds, beneficiary designations, account statements, signed but unrecorded transfer documents, or testimony from those who assisted with the decedent’s estate planning. This remedy is particularly useful when a Pour-Over Will or other instruments show intent to fund the trust but administrative steps were incomplete at the time of death.
Not every asset qualifies for a Heggstad Petition and the court will evaluate whether the evidence meets the required standard. The process typically begins with a petition filed in the appropriate probate court, followed by notice to interested persons and a hearing where evidence is presented. Results can include a court order directing county recording offices to transfer title or issuing instructions to the trustee about distribution. Parties should be prepared to supply documentary and testimonial evidence showing the decedent’s intent and any steps taken to transfer the asset into the trust.
A Heggstad Petition is a legal request to a probate court asking it to recognize that certain property was meant to be part of a decedent’s trust even though the formal transfer was not completed. The name comes from case law that clarified how courts may use available evidence to determine the decedent’s intent. The petition is commonly used for real property, bank accounts, or other titled assets where the decedent took steps toward placing the asset in the trust but formalities remained. Its purpose is to effectuate the decedent’s wishes and allow trustees to carry out trust administration without unnecessary delay.
Key elements include demonstrating the decedent’s intent to fund the trust and showing steps taken toward that goal. Typical supporting materials are the trust agreement, deeds, account applications, beneficiary designation forms, and any correspondence or notes indicating the settlor’s plans. The process involves preparing a petition, serving notice to interested parties, and presenting evidence at a hearing. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it may enter an order directing transfer or clarifying ownership, which can then be recorded with county offices to reflect the trust’s ownership.
Understanding common terms helps families navigate a Heggstad Petition. This glossary covers the basic concepts you will encounter when pursuing or responding to a petition, including trust documents, probate court filings, and title transfer mechanics. Familiarity with these terms makes it easier to gather the necessary evidence and communicate effectively with the trustee, attorney, and the court. Below are clear definitions of typical terms you will see in filings and court orders relevant to trust funding and post-death transfers.
A Heggstad Petition is a judicial request to have a court declare that certain property should be treated as trust property despite a lack of formal transfer before the settlor’s death. The petition relies on evidence showing the settlor’s intent and any preliminary actions taken to fund the trust. Filing a petition can lead to a court order that allows trustees to access, manage, or distribute the property under the trust terms, often avoiding more protracted probate procedures for those specific assets.
A Pour-Over Will is a type of will commonly used with a revocable living trust that directs any assets remaining in the decedent’s individual name at death to be transferred into the trust. It serves as a safety net to capture assets not retitled prior to death, and when combined with a Heggstad Petition it can strengthen a claim that the decedent intended assets to pass to the trust. A Pour-Over Will typically requires probate to pass assets unless alternative remedies, like a Heggstad Petition, apply.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a settlor transfers ownership of assets to a trustee to manage for the benefit of named beneficiaries under the terms of the trust document. Revocable living trusts are commonly used in estate planning to avoid probate, manage assets during incapacity, and provide structured distribution after death. When title to assets remains in the settlor’s name at death, the trustee may seek court orders, including Heggstad Petitions, to clarify ownership and allow trust administration.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets are held in the decedent’s name and no alternative transfer mechanism applies. Probate typically involves validating a will, appointing an executor or administrator, inventorying assets, paying debts and taxes, and distributing remaining property to beneficiaries. Heggstad Petitions can sometimes limit probate involvement by resolving ownership of specific assets directly in probate court, allowing trustees to move assets into the trust without full estate administration.
When an asset remains titled in the decedent’s name, there are multiple paths to transfer ownership: probate administration, a small estate affidavit, trust administration with a Heggstad Petition, or utilizing beneficiary designations and transfer-on-death instruments. A Heggstad Petition can be more efficient than full probate for specific assets when strong evidence of intent exists. However, depending on the asset value, creditor claims, and family circumstances, probate or other procedures may still be necessary. Assessing the best option requires reviewing the estate plan, asset records, and potential objections from interested parties.
A limited Heggstad Petition approach often works well for assets of modest value or those with clear documentary evidence showing intent to fund a trust. Examples include bank accounts with drafts indicating transfer, real estate deeds with preparatory documents, or beneficiary forms referencing a trust. When the evidence is strong and interested parties do not dispute ownership, the court can resolve the issue relatively quickly. This path can avoid the time and cost of full probate for narrowly defined assets while preserving trust-based distribution plans.
A limited approach is more viable when beneficiaries, trustees, and heirs are generally in agreement about the decedent’s intent and there are no active creditor disputes. Cooperation among interested persons reduces the risk of contested hearings and allows the court to rely on documentary proof rather than extensive litigation. Local procedures in Monterey County tend to favor orderly, evidence-based petitions when parties provide clear records and streamline the court’s review, enabling more efficient resolution of trust ownership questions.
When assets are high in value, involve multiple forms of title, or include competing claims, a more comprehensive legal approach may be needed. Complex assets may require coordinated actions such as quiet title proceedings, tax reviews, creditor claim resolution, or additional filings beyond a Heggstad Petition. Careful, structured handling of these matters helps protect the estate’s value and ensures that transfers do not create unintended liabilities. Working through complex issues also helps prevent later challenges that could disrupt trust administration.
When family members dispute ownership or beneficiaries contest trust terms, a full-service approach becomes important to protect client interests and address litigation risks. Contested claims may require depositions, preparation of robust evidentiary records, negotiation, and possibly trial. Thorough representation anticipates potential objections, manages settlement discussions, and coordinates multiple filings to both resolve disputes and advance trust administration. A comprehensive plan helps minimize delay and provides a clear strategy for resolving disputes in probate court.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad-related matters provides thorough protection against later challenges and addresses multiple legal and administrative needs in a coordinated way. It ensures that title issues, creditor matters, tax consequences, and beneficiary concerns are all reviewed together. This approach reduces the chance of oversight when assets have layered documentation or complex ownership histories, and it allows trustees to proceed with confidence in managing or distributing assets according to the trust terms, while minimizing delay and potential additional expense from unanticipated problems.
Taking a broad view also helps families preserve estate value and avoid piecemeal litigation that can escalate costs and extend timelines. Coordinated filings and settlement efforts can resolve disputes more quickly than reactive, case-by-case responses. In Monterey County and neighboring jurisdictions, proactive preparation of records and strategic negotiation often results in smoother court proceedings and better outcomes for trustees and beneficiaries, including clearer court orders that are easier to record and enforce against third parties.
One of the main benefits of a comprehensive approach is achieving greater certainty about who holds title to an asset and under what terms it should be managed or distributed. Well-prepared petitions and supporting evidence yield clearer court orders that county recorders accept and that third parties will recognize. That certainty simplifies subsequent transactions such as sales, transfers, or distributions to beneficiaries and helps avoid future litigation over ownership. It also protects trustees from potential liability by documenting a judicial determination of trust ownership.
Comprehensive handling reduces the risk that overlooked issues will spawn future claims or disputes. By addressing creditor notifications, potential tax consequences, and the possibility of competing beneficiary claims early, trustees can obtain court orders that minimize exposure. This integrated approach helps ensure that distributions follow the settlor’s intentions while protecting the estate from later challenges that can drain assets and prolong administration. Careful documentation and procedural compliance are central to achieving durable resolutions.
Start by assembling all potential evidence that shows the decedent’s intent to fund a trust: the trust document, deeds, bank or account statements, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence, and any drafts of transfer instruments. Also collect notes, emails, or witness statements from persons who assisted the decedent with estate planning. Early documentation streamlines the petition and reduces the likelihood of contested hearings. A well-organized evidence packet helps the court evaluate the claim efficiently and supports clearer, more enforceable court orders that trustees can rely upon.
Understand that a Heggstad Petition often requires formal filings, notice to interested persons, and presentation of admissible evidence in probate court. Prepare declarations and evidentiary exhibits that clearly link the asset to the trust and show any steps the decedent took to transfer it. Anticipate questions about title history, creditor liabilities, and tax implications. Being prepared for procedural and substantive court requirements helps the trustee present a persuasive case and can reduce the risk of delays or additional filings that prolong resolution.
Consider a Heggstad Petition when you find assets that appear intended for a trust but remain titled in the decedent’s individual name, and when timely access to those assets matters for obligations or distributions. This petition can avoid the need for full probate for that specific asset, reduce administrative delays, and provide a court order to facilitate trustee actions. It is often appropriate when documentation or conduct strongly indicates the settlor’s intent to have the trust own the asset, and when interested persons either agree or can be presented with compelling evidence.
Another reason to consider this service is to obtain a judicial determination that helps prevent future disputes over ownership. A recorded court order resulting from a Heggstad Petition gives third parties such as title companies, banks, and other institutions confidence to recognize the trustee’s authority. Families may opt for this route to protect estate value, expedite necessary transactions like selling property or accessing funds, and align administration with the decedent’s planning goals while keeping court involvement focused and efficient.
Frequent scenarios include when a settlor executed a revocable living trust but left real property or accounts in their individual name, when a Pour-Over Will indicates assets should move into the trust, or when transfer paperwork was prepared but not recorded. Other cases involve beneficiary designation conflicts, changes in deed forms, or transfers interrupted by illness or incapacity. Each situation requires a fact-specific review to determine whether a petition is appropriate and whether the evidence will likely persuade a probate court to recognize trust ownership.
Sometimes a deed or other transfer document was prepared and signed but never recorded prior to death, leaving title in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad Petition can present the unrecorded document along with supporting declarations and other records to show the decedent intended the trust to own the property. When properly supported, a court order can direct the county recorder to accept the court’s determination and update title records accordingly, allowing trustees to manage or convey the property under the trust’s terms.
A Pour-Over Will may direct any remaining assets into the decedent’s trust, but assets left in the decedent’s name may still require a probate process to effectuate the transfer. In some cases a Heggstad Petition can provide a targeted means of transferring a particular asset without full probate by demonstrating intent and relevant steps the decedent took. This can reduce costs and delays for the asset in question while the broader estate is otherwise managed according to the will or trust documents.
Occasionally account records or beneficiary designations conflict with trust documents or were not updated to reflect the trust, creating uncertainty about ownership. A Heggstad Petition can address such discrepancies by presenting documentary evidence and declarations that clarify the settlor’s intent. The court’s determination can then resolve the conflict and allow the trustee to assert control over the asset, ensuring distributions conform to the trust while providing the clarity needed for banks, title companies, and other institutions to release funds or transfer title.
For Pacific Grove and surrounding areas of Monterey County, local knowledge of court procedures and recording requirements can make an important difference in a Heggstad Petition matter. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with gathering records, preparing filings, coordinating notice to interested parties, and presenting the petition in the appropriate probate court. We aim to help trustees and families pursue an orderly resolution so that assets move into the trust and distributions proceed in line with the decedent’s planning documents while respecting local court rules and timelines.
Our firm focuses on clear, thorough handling of trust-related matters for residents across Monterey County, including Pacific Grove. We take time to review trust instruments and gather relevant evidence to support a petition, and we keep clients informed about possible outcomes and procedural steps. Families rely on careful document preparation and consistent communication to minimize surprises, reduce delays, and pursue the most efficient resolution possible under local court practices and statutory requirements.
When preparing a Heggstad Petition, attention to documentary detail and procedural compliance are key to presenting a convincing case to the probate court. We coordinate with trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties such as title and financial institutions to assemble the records courts expect to see. Early preparation of declarations, exhibits, and notice materials helps avoid common pitfalls that can lead to contested hearings or additional filings, and promotes a more predictable path to title resolution and trust administration.
We also assist with post-judgment tasks such as recording court orders, updating title records, and advising trustees on next steps for distribution or management of assets now confirmed as trust property. This continuity helps ensure the court’s determination has practical effect and that trustees can act confidently when selling, transferring, or distributing assets according to the trust terms. Our goal is to provide practical legal support that aligns with your family’s needs and California procedural requirements.
Our process begins with a comprehensive review of the trust document and all related records to determine whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate. We then identify interested parties, gather supporting evidence, draft the petition and required notices, and file with the probate court in the correct jurisdiction. If necessary, we prepare declarations and exhibits for hearing. After obtaining a court order we assist with recording and any follow-up matters, helping trustees implement the court’s directives and proceed with trust administration efficiently and professionally.
The initial step focuses on examining trust documents, deeds, account records, beneficiary forms, and any communications that indicate the decedent’s intent to place assets in the trust. We evaluate the strength of the evidence and identify any procedural hurdles, such as potential heirs, creditor claims, or conflicting records. This assessment shapes the petition strategy and helps estimate likely timelines and costs. Clear assessment up front reduces surprises and helps families decide how to proceed in a manner consistent with their goals and available evidence.
Gathering every relevant document is essential: the trust agreement, deeds, bank statements, account applications, emails, and any other records that reflect transfer steps or intent. We work with trustees and family members to locate original documents and create organized exhibit sets suitable for court review. Properly assembled records increase the likelihood the court will accept the petition and provide a definitive order, reducing the chance of additional hearings or requests for further evidence that can delay resolution.
Identifying and notifying interested persons is a required part of the petition process. This includes beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors who must receive notice of the petition. We prepare required notices and coordinate service to ensure compliance with court rules and statutory timelines. Proper notice reduces the likelihood of procedural objections and helps the court proceed to evaluate the petition on its merits, allowing the matter to move forward without unnecessary delays caused by insufficient service.
After preparing the petition and exhibits, we file the documents with the probate court and serve notice to interested parties. The petition outlines the facts, legal basis, and supporting evidence that the asset should be treated as trust property. If no substantive objections arise, the court may resolve the matter on submitted declarations and exhibits. If objections are raised, we prepare for a hearing where testimony and documentary evidence are presented to support the petition and address opposing claims.
Drafting the petition involves laying out the factual background, identifying the asset, citing relevant trust provisions, and attaching exhibits that show intent to fund the trust. The petition also specifies relief requested, such as an order directing the recorder to reflect the trust’s ownership. Clear, well-organized petitions help the court understand the matter quickly and reduce the need for follow-up filings, saving time and expense for trustees and beneficiaries seeking resolution.
If interested parties object, we respond with additional evidence, declarations, or legal briefing to defend the petition. Preparing for a hearing includes lining up witnesses, organizing exhibits, and anticipating common lines of challenge, such as disputes over document authenticity or competing interpretations of intent. Thorough preparation increases the chances that the court will reach a conclusion consistent with the decedent’s documented plans and will provide clear instructions for recording and trust administration.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we assist with recording the judgment or other required instruments with the county recorder and completing any follow-up tasks necessary to transfer title or release funds. We also advise trustees on distribution steps, potential tax implications, and resolving any remaining estate administration issues. Ensuring the order is properly recorded and implemented is vital to making the court’s determination effective for third parties and future transactions.
Recording the court’s order with the county recorder is the practical step that updates public records and confirms the trust’s ownership for third parties. We prepare the necessary recording documents and coordinate with county offices to ensure the record reflects the court’s decision. Proper recording reduces friction with title companies, financial institutions, and potential purchasers who need clear evidence of ownership to complete transactions or disburse funds to the trustee.
After title issues are resolved, trustees often face additional administrative tasks such as selling property, distributing proceeds to beneficiaries, or managing assets according to trust terms. We provide guidance on trustee responsibilities, help prepare necessary documents for transfers or sales, and advise on interactions with banks or title companies. This follow-through ensures that the court’s order produces practical results and that trustees can carry out the trust’s directives in a compliant and orderly way.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate court filing that requests a judicial determination that a particular asset should be treated as trust property despite not being formally retitled before the settlor’s death. It is typically used when a revocable living trust exists and documentation or actions by the decedent indicate an intent to fund the trust, but the asset still appears in the decedent’s name. The petition presents evidence such as trust documents, deeds, account records, and witness declarations to show that the decedent intended the trust to own the asset and seeks an order to transfer or clarify title for trust administration. Filing a petition is appropriate when the asset’s transfer to the trust would honor the decedent’s documented wishes and when avoiding a separate probate proceeding for that asset is desirable. The court reviews the evidence and may grant an order directing county recording offices to update title or advising trustees on how to manage the asset. Parties should be ready to provide organized evidence and identify interested persons for notice to ensure the court can evaluate the petition efficiently.
Timing for a Heggstad Petition varies by county and the complexity of the evidence or any objections raised. In Monterey County, an uncontested petition supported by clear documents may be resolved within a few weeks to a few months, depending on court schedules and the time needed for notice and recording. Contested matters or cases requiring additional evidentiary development can extend longer. Local practice and seasonal court workloads also influence timelines, so preparing a complete petition and promptly serving notice can reduce delays and help move the matter forward more predictably. Parties should plan for potential follow-up tasks such as responding to objections, attending hearings, and recording the resulting court order. Delays often arise from incomplete documentation or contested ownership claims. Early coordination with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions helps to minimize the risk of extended proceedings. We advise collecting records up front and anticipating potential questions to expedite the court’s review and post-judgment recording steps.
The most persuasive evidence in a Heggstad Petition includes the trust agreement itself, deeds or drafts of deeds, account applications showing the trust as the intended owner, beneficiary designation forms referring to the trust, and contemporaneous communications reflecting the decedent’s intent. Declarations from individuals who assisted with estate planning or who have direct knowledge of the settlor’s intentions can also be influential. Organized documentary exhibits that create a clear chain from the settlor’s planning to the asset in question are especially helpful when the court evaluates the petition. Courts look for reliable, corroborating documentation that demonstrates both intent and steps toward transfer. Documents that are signed, dated, and contemporaneous with the trust formation carry more weight than later recollections alone. Presenting records in a coherent exhibit format and coupling them with sworn declarations that explain the context and actions taken strengthens the petition and reduces the likelihood of additional evidentiary hearings.
A Heggstad Petition is often used for real property and other titled assets, but it has limits with certain account types. Bank accounts and retirement accounts commonly use beneficiary designations or transfer-on-death mechanisms that bypass probate. If those designations name the trust or can be shown to reflect the decedent’s intent to benefit the trust, a petition may help resolve conflicting records. However, retirement accounts have their own rules and tax implications, so handling them may require additional steps beyond a Heggstad Petition to ensure compliance with plan rules and tax law. Financial institutions and retirement plan administrators may require specific documentation, and some accounts are governed by federal or plan-specific rules that affect transferability. When accounts have conflicting designations or lack clarity, presenting detailed account records and correspondence that show intent is important. Coordinating with account custodians and understanding plan-specific procedures helps ensure the transfer aligns with both the court order and the institution’s internal requirements.
A Heggstad Petition resolves ownership issues for specific assets but does not necessarily eliminate the need for probate for an entire estate. If most assets were held in trust and only a few items remain in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad Petition can avoid separate probate for those items. However, when the estate has multiple assets, debts, or disputes that require full administration, probate may still be necessary. The petition is a targeted remedy; its utility depends on the scope of assets and whether other estate administration matters require court supervision. In short, a successful petition can narrow the aspects of an estate that need probate, but it does not substitute for probate when broader estate administration is required. Trustees and families should evaluate the overall estate picture to determine whether multiple filings or a comprehensive probate approach are advisable, and consider both legal and practical implications of each path.
Common objections to a Heggstad Petition include disputes over the authenticity or interpretation of documents, competing claims from heirs or creditors, and arguments that the decedent lacked intent to fund the trust for that asset. Addressing these objections requires presenting stronger documentary evidence, additional witness declarations, and legal argument demonstrating the proper interpretation of trust provisions and transfer steps. Preparing to rebut potential lines of challenge reduces the risk of an adverse ruling or the need for extended litigation, and helps the court reach a clear conclusion based on the record presented. When objections arise, the court may schedule an evidentiary hearing where parties produce testimony and exhibits. Resolving objections often involves clarifying timelines, demonstrating the decedent’s consistent actions toward funding the trust, and explaining any apparent discrepancies in records. Engaging in early communication with objecting parties to explore settlement or narrowing issues can also reduce litigation costs and lead to a more efficient resolution.
Costs to pursue a Heggstad Petition vary depending on the complexity of gathering documents, the need for contested hearings, and attorney involvement in drafting and presenting the petition. Routine, uncontested matters with clear documentation will generally cost less than cases requiring extensive discovery, witness preparation, or courtroom appearances. Additional expenses can include filing fees, costs for certified copies or record retrieval, and fees for recording the resulting court order with the county recorder. Estimating costs requires an initial review of the available evidence and the number of interested parties involved. It is also worth considering the potential savings that a successful petition may bring by avoiding full probate for particular assets. In some cases the expense of pursuing the petition can be offset by lower overall administration costs and quicker access to trust property. We provide transparent discussions about likely fees and potential cost-saving strategies during the initial consultation so families can make informed decisions.
Whether heirs or beneficiaries must attend a hearing depends on the case specifics and whether they object to the petition. If all interested parties are properly noticed and do not object, the court may rule on declarations and documentary evidence without live testimony. However, if objections are filed or the judge requests oral testimony, witnesses or interested persons may be required to appear. Proper notice and voluntary cooperation from interested persons often reduce the need for in-person hearings, while contested matters typically involve live testimony and more extensive court time. Even if attendance is not required, we recommend that interested parties stay informed and review the petition materials so they understand the evidence being presented. Clear communication reduces misunderstandings and may prevent objections that would prolong the process. When hearings are necessary, we prepare clients and witnesses so they can provide concise, focused testimony that supports the petition’s factual record.
After a court grants a Heggstad Petition, the court issues an order that can be recorded with the county recorder or used to effectuate the transfer of title or control to the trustee. We assist trustees in recording the order and completing any steps required by third parties such as banks, title companies, or government agencies to recognize the trust’s ownership. This recorded order becomes a public record confirming the trust’s rights and allows trustees to manage, sell, or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms in a way that third parties will accept. Following entry of judgment and recording, trustees still have administrative responsibilities under the trust, including paying taxes or debts related to the asset and distributing proceeds to beneficiaries as directed. We help by advising on post-judgment compliance and coordinating with institutions that require specific documentation to release funds or transfer title. This follow-through ensures the court’s decision has an effective, practical impact for trust administration.
To begin a Heggstad Petition in Pacific Grove, start by collecting all documents related to the trust and the asset in question, including deeds, bank statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence showing intent. Identify who the interested parties are and gather contact information. With those materials in hand, contact a probate attorney or law firm familiar with local Monterey County practices to review the records and guide you through preparing a petition, notices, and supporting exhibits. An initial case assessment clarifies the strength of the evidence and likely next steps. After an initial review, the firm typically drafts the petition and serves required notices to interested persons. If no objections arise, the court may resolve the matter on submitted evidence. If objections do arise, the firm will prepare for a hearing with declarations and any necessary witnesses. Early organization and timely filing improve the chances of an efficient resolution and reduce delays in moving the asset into the trust for administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas