A trust modification petition lets a settlor, trustee, or beneficiary ask the court to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances or intent no longer align with the original document. In Pacific Grove and across Monterey County, these petitions address issues like ambiguity, changed family circumstances, drafting errors, or the need to correct administrative provisions. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we guide clients through the requirements for filing a petition, explain potential outcomes, and help evaluate alternatives such as amendment, decanting, or reformation. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss whether a petition is appropriate for your situation.
Trust modification matters involve careful analysis of the trust instrument, beneficiary interests, and applicable California law. A court petition may be necessary when parties disagree about the meaning of a provision, when changes are needed to reflect the settlor’s intent, or when unforeseen events have made the original terms impractical. Our approach focuses on clear communication, reviewing evidence that supports the proposed change, and pursuing a resolution that protects client interests while respecting the trust’s purpose. We assist with document preparation, noticing interested parties, and representing clients at hearings when litigation becomes necessary.
Modifying a trust through a petition can restore alignment between the trust’s terms and the settlor’s current intentions or family realities. Benefits include clarifying ambiguous language, correcting drafting mistakes, enabling administration to proceed smoothly, and addressing life changes such as divorce, remarriage, disability, or the death of a beneficiary. A successful petition can prevent future disputes, reduce administration costs, and ensure assets pass as intended. Even when full modification is not granted, petitions can secure judicial guidance that reduces uncertainty and helps trustees and beneficiaries carry out the trust in accordance with the court’s directives.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Pacific Grove and throughout California with a focus on estate planning and trust administration matters. Our team assists with trust drafting, trust interpretation, trust administration issues, and court petitions to modify or reform trusts when appropriate. We emphasize thoughtful review of trust documents, practical strategies to resolve disputes, and careful preparation of the factual record needed for court proceedings. Clients benefit from a local practice that understands Monterey County procedures and seeks efficient resolutions while protecting client rights and the settlor’s intentions.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate or superior court to change one or more provisions of a trust instrument. California law allows courts to reform or modify trusts in certain circumstances, including when the document contains mistakes, when extrinsic evidence shows the settlor’s actual intent, or when changes are needed to achieve tax or administrative goals. The process involves filing pleadings, notifying interested parties, and submitting evidence, which can include declarations, prior drafts, correspondence, or other records demonstrating the need for modification. Courts weigh the settlor’s intent and the impact on beneficiaries when deciding whether to allow changes.
Not every requested change will be approved by the court. Courts consider factors such as whether the requested modification conflicts with the settlor’s clear intent, whether beneficiaries’ rights are unjustly affected, and whether a nonjudicial method of adjustment is available. Trustees and beneficiaries may have opposing views, which can lead to contested hearings. In some cases parties reach settlements or stipulations that resolve issues without prolonged litigation. Understanding the procedural requirements, possible outcomes, and timing considerations helps clients make informed choices about pursuing a petition and minimizing disruption to trust administration.
A trust modification petition asks the court to alter the trust’s terms for reasons recognized by law. Typical goals include correcting typographical or drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous provisions, aligning the document with the settlor’s demonstrated intent, or adjusting administrative provisions that hinder efficient trust management. Petitions may also seek reformation to conform the written trust to a settlor’s actual intent when mistakes are evident. The petition process provides a formal mechanism to obtain judicial authority for changes that otherwise would not be possible, reducing uncertainty for trustees and protecting the interests of beneficiaries.
The essential components of a trust modification petition include a clear statement of the requested change, supporting factual evidence, legal grounds under California probate or trust law, and notice to all interested parties. The process typically begins with an investigation of the trust documents and relevant communications, followed by drafting pleadings, filing them in the appropriate court, serving notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties, and presenting evidence at a hearing if objections arise. Settlement negotiations may occur at any stage, and the court may issue an order that approves, modifies, or denies the proposed changes based on the record and applicable legal standards.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate trust modification matters. This section defines important phrases used during the process and explains how they affect outcomes. Definitions focus on terms found in pleadings, trust instruments, and court orders. Clear definitions reduce confusion when reviewing documents or discussing options with counsel. Familiarity with these terms supports better decision making throughout the petition process and helps parties understand what evidence and legal standards will be relevant in court proceedings regarding trust changes or reformation requests.
Reformation is a legal remedy the court can use to correct the terms of a trust so that the written document reflects the settlor’s actual intent when a mistake in drafting or transcription has occurred. Reformation requires clear and convincing evidence that the settlor’s intent differs from the language used in the trust and that the error was not the result of a changed mind. The remedy is often sought when extrinsic evidence such as prior drafts, correspondence, or witness testimony demonstrates the settlor’s true plan. Reformation aligns the trust with the established intent while preserving the overall estate plan.
Decanting refers to the transfer of assets from an existing trust into a new trust with different terms when state law permits trustees to do so without court intervention. Decanting can address administrative inefficiencies, clarify beneficiary designations, or adjust distribution mechanisms. It is typically available only when the trust instrument grants the trustee appropriate powers or when state statutes authorize the practice. Decanting may provide a nonjudicial alternative to a court petition, but it requires careful analysis of trustee authority, fiduciary duties, and the potential impact on beneficiaries, especially in complex family or tax situations.
A petitioner is the individual or entity who files the petition asking the court to modify the trust, while interested parties include beneficiaries, co-trustees, and other people or entities who have legal or financial interests affected by the trust. The court requires notice to interested parties so they can respond, object, or consent to the requested changes. Understanding who qualifies as an interested party is important because their rights and objections can determine the proceeding’s scope, whether hearings occur, and how the court evaluates the balance between the settlor’s intent and beneficiary protections.
A constructive trust is an equitable remedy imposed by a court to prevent unjust enrichment when someone wrongfully holds property that legally belongs to another. It is not the same as a voluntarily created trust, but courts may impose a constructive trust in situations involving fraud, undue influence, or misappropriation of assets related to estate and trust matters. When a constructive trust is ordered, the court directs that the property be held for the beneficiary’s benefit or returned to the appropriate party, which can influence outcomes in disputes involving alleged wrongful transfers or improper control over trust property.
When addressing a problem with an existing trust, clients may choose between several approaches. A petition to the court seeks formal judicial approval to modify or reform the trust. An amendment or restatement may be possible when the settlor is available and capable of making changes. Decanting is a trustee-initiated administrative transfer permitted in some circumstances. Negotiated settlements among parties can resolve disputes without litigation. Each option carries legal requirements, timelines, and risks. Choosing the right path depends on the trust language, the settlor’s condition, beneficiary positions, and statutory authority, all of which we evaluate carefully for each client.
A limited approach is often suitable when the settlor remains alive and has the legal capacity to amend or restate the trust. In that situation, the settlor can execute a formal amendment that clarifies intent or corrects language without court involvement. This path avoids the costs, time, and publicity associated with court petitions and preserves privacy for the family. Parties should still ensure proper witnessing and notarial procedures and consider whether existing documents grant the trustee authority for certain changes. When the settlor’s wishes are clear and consent obtains from major stakeholders, an amendment can be an efficient solution.
If the trust instrument gives the trustee explicit powers to adjust administrative terms or to exercise discretion over distributions in particular ways, a limited administrative change may be executed without court approval. Trustees must act within their fiduciary duties and document decisions carefully to avoid disputes. Relying on trustee powers can resolve technical or procedural issues quickly, such as updating account procedures or clarifying distribution mechanics, but trustees should assess the potential for beneficiary disagreement and the legal boundaries of their authority before making unilateral changes.
Comprehensive legal action becomes necessary when the trust contains ambiguous provisions, clear drafting errors, or competing claims about what the settlor intended. Courts can examine extrinsic evidence, prior drafts, and communications to determine true intent and fashion an order that resolves the ambiguity. Where beneficiaries contest changes or where the settlor’s mental state at the time of execution is at issue, a carefully prepared record and persuasive legal argument are essential. In such cases, a full petition offers a definitive resolution that minimizes future litigation risk by obtaining judicial authority for the requested correction or modification.
When changes affect tax planning, creditor rights, blended family provisions, or irrevocable arrangements, seeking a court order can provide certainty and reduce downstream disputes. Court involvement may be the safest route when proposed modifications could have unintended tax consequences or when beneficiary rights are materially affected. Complex family dynamics such as contested guardianship nominations, special needs provisions, or competing beneficiary claims may also warrant judicial oversight. Comprehensive legal representation helps gather necessary financial and medical records, prepare legal arguments, and pursue a court-approved solution that addresses both family objectives and legal requirements.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification combines careful document review, targeted evidence gathering, and effective legal advocacy to increase the chances of a favorable result. Court-sanctioned modifications reduce ambiguity and provide a clear roadmap for trustees and beneficiaries. This approach can also reduce the likelihood of future disputes by putting an authoritative order on record, making it easier to administer trust assets in accordance with the settlor’s corrected intent. Comprehensive planning also addresses ancillary issues such as tax consequences, beneficiary protections, and preservation of legacy provisions for heirs or charitable gifts.
Comprehensive representation includes communicating with beneficiaries, exploring settlement opportunities, and preparing a thorough evidentiary record in case the matter proceeds to hearing. This proactive strategy often shortens timelines and reduces the cost of extended dispute resolution by clarifying legal positions early and prioritizing issues that affect administration. When petitions are required, presenting a meticulously prepared case helps courts understand the context and grant relief that accurately reflects the settlor’s intentions without inviting additional litigation down the road.
One key benefit of a comprehensive approach is that it produces clear and enforceable trust terms that guide trustees and beneficiaries moving forward. Judicial modification or reformation results in a court order that removes ambiguity and authoritatively resolves contested interpretations. Clear terms reduce the possibility of trustee hesitation, beneficiary disputes, or administrative errors when managing assets. This clarity also facilitates smoother transfers, distributions, and interactions with financial institutions or successor trustees, helping the trust operate as intended without recurring legal uncertainty.
By seeking a judicial resolution when necessary and carefully documenting changes, a comprehensive approach lowers the risk of future litigation over trust interpretation or administration. Courts can issue definitive orders that future parties and institutions must follow, which reduces administrative burdens and uncertainty. Thorough representation also identifies and addresses potential conflicts before they escalate, preserving estate assets and minimizing the time trustees spend defending decisions. This preventive work can be cost-effective compared to repeated disputes or contested accountings in later years.
Collect trust instruments, prior drafts, relevant correspondence, medical records if mental capacity is an issue, and any emails or letters that reflect the settlor’s intent. Having a complete document set early speeds case assessment and strengthens the factual foundation for a petition or negotiation. Detailed records help demonstrate whether an error is clerical or substantive, and they allow counsel to evaluate whether nonjudicial alternatives like amendment or decanting are possible. Early organization also streamlines communications with beneficiaries and reduces delay when filing deadlines or court hearing dates arise.
Before pursuing a contested petition, evaluate nonjudicial options like amendments by the settlor when possible, trustee-initiated decanting, or negotiated modifications among beneficiaries. These alternatives can save time, expense, and public exposure. However, confirm that any nonjudicial route complies with the trust terms and state law and that the approach will not create future vulnerabilities. If a nonjudicial solution is not feasible, preparing a solid evidentiary record and legal argument for a court petition becomes the prudent next step to secure a durable resolution.
People pursue trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous terms, updating distribution provisions after major life events, or addressing tax planning needs that the original document did not anticipate. When the settlor’s intent is unclear or when administrative provisions interfere with efficient trust management, a petition provides a formal avenue to resolve those problems. Courts can align the written instrument with evidence of intent and issue orders that facilitate proper trust administration while respecting beneficiary rights under California law.
Other circumstances that lead to petitions include disputes over trustee powers, competing beneficiary claims, or situations where the settlor lacked capacity at the time the trust was executed. Petition proceedings also address requests for modification of irrevocable arrangements in limited circumstances and requests to remove or replace trustees. When disagreements threaten the trust’s purpose or assets, seeking judicial clarification or reformation can preserve the settlor’s goals and protect trust property from mismanagement, improper distribution, or prolonged litigation among heirs.
Typical situations prompting petitions include typographical errors in beneficiary names or distributions, changes in family structure such as remarriage or divorce, the birth of additional heirs, discoveries of intent documented in prior drafts, and the need to update administrative provisions for modern financial management. Medical incapacity or cognitive decline that raises questions about the trust’s validity can also trigger petitions. In many cases, petitions aim to preserve the settlor’s original plan while adapting to realities that were not foreseen when the trust was created.
Drafting errors and ambiguous language are frequently at the heart of modification petitions. Small mistakes can have outsized effects on who receives assets and under what conditions. When ambiguity causes disagreement among beneficiaries or prevents trustees from acting, petitioning the court for reformation or clarification helps resolve the issue formally. The court will consider evidence demonstrating the settlor’s original intent and may issue an order that corrects the record so trust administration can proceed in a manner consistent with that intent.
Significant life events such as divorce, remarriage, the addition of grandchildren, or the loss of a beneficiary often necessitate revisiting trust terms. These changes can make the original dispositions unfair or outdated relative to the settlor’s current wishes. When the settlor is unavailable to amend the trust directly, a petition to modify the trust may be the appropriate route to realign distributions and administrative instructions with present-day realities while seeking a court order that manages competing interests fairly.
Sometimes trust provisions impede practical administration or create unintended tax consequences. Issues such as outdated distribution mechanics, references to obsolete account types, or provisions that conflict with current tax planning objectives may require modification. A petition can clarify administrative authority, correct obsolete language, and permit adjustments that allow trustees to manage assets more effectively. In tax-sensitive situations, involving counsel early ensures that proposed changes avoid adverse tax impacts and comply with legal standards applicable to trust modifications.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents clients in Pacific Grove and Monterey County on trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We provide practical guidance on evaluating whether a petition is appropriate, preparing the necessary pleadings, serving interested parties, and presenting evidence at hearings when required. Our office assists trustees, beneficiaries, and settlors with careful document review and strategic advice tailored to the local court environment. We aim to resolve matters efficiently while protecting client interests and preserving the settlor’s intended legacy.
Our firm focuses on estate planning and trust administration matters for clients in Pacific Grove and throughout California. We guide clients through the nuances of trust modification petitions, from initial case assessment and evidence gathering to negotiations and court hearings. Our approach emphasizes clarity, responsiveness, and practical solutions designed to align trust documents with the settlor’s intentions while protecting beneficiary rights. Clients rely on our plain-language explanations and careful preparation when faced with decisions about petitioning the court or pursuing alternatives to litigation.
We take a collaborative approach with clients to understand family dynamics, financial considerations, and long-term objectives. This includes reviewing related estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives to ensure consistency across the plan. Whether the matter involves straightforward corrections or contested petitions, we prioritize efficient resolution and proactive communication with all parties. Our goal is to minimize disruption to trust administration while striving for outcomes that honor the settlor’s intentions.
When court action is necessary, we prepare a thorough factual record and present legal arguments that explain why modification or reformation is warranted under California law. We also explore settlement opportunities to resolve disputes without a lengthy trial when appropriate. For trustees seeking guidance on their duties or beneficiaries concerned about proposed changes, we offer focused advice and representation to protect interests. Contact our office in Pacific Grove to discuss how we can assist with your trust modification needs and next steps.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to understand the trust document, the client’s objectives, and any disputes or practical problems. We then collect and review relevant documents, identify legal grounds for modification, and discuss nonjudicial alternatives. If filing is appropriate, we draft the petition, prepare declarations and exhibits, and ensure proper notice to interested parties. We pursue settlement discussions when feasible and represent clients at hearings to present evidence and legal arguments. Throughout the process we aim to manage timelines, costs, and risks to achieve a durable result.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust, related estate planning documents, and any communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent. This includes prior drafts, correspondence, financial records, and medical reports if capacity is at issue. We assess statutory grounds for reformation or modification, evaluate interested parties, and estimate procedural timelines and potential outcomes. This evaluation helps determine whether a petition, a negotiated amendment, or a trustee-initiated administrative solution is the best path forward for resolving the identified issue.
Gathering a strong evidentiary record is essential for any petition to change a trust. We collect documents such as prior drafts, emails, letters, witness statements, and financial records that support the claimed intent or identify drafting errors. When capacity or undue influence is in question, medical records and testimony may be necessary. A well-organized record allows us to present clear, persuasive evidence to the court or opposing parties and supports efficient settlement discussions when appropriate.
Identifying and notifying all interested parties is a key procedural requirement. Interested parties typically include beneficiaries, co-trustees, and sometimes creditors or guardians. Proper service ensures that everyone has an opportunity to appear, object, or consent. We prepare and manage notices, calculate statutory timelines, and handle filings to prevent procedural missteps. Accurate notice practices reduce the risk of later challenges to the court’s jurisdiction or to the validity of any resulting order.
Once the case assessment and document collection are complete, we draft the petition and supporting declarations, file them with the appropriate court, and serve interested parties as required by law. At this stage we also open channels for settlement discussions to determine whether a negotiated resolution is possible. Filing the petition initiates the formal process and sets deadlines for responses, allowing the court and parties to schedule hearings, mediation, or other dispute resolution measures depending on how the other parties respond.
Preparation of legal arguments and written briefs is essential when a petition is contested. We analyze applicable case law and statutes, craft persuasive legal theories that align with the evidentiary record, and present a clear chronology showing how the requested modification restores the settlor’s intent or corrects an error. These materials help the court understand the legal basis for the requested change and support any evidentiary presentations at hearings or settlement sessions.
We engage in negotiations and explore alternative dispute resolution to minimize court time and expense. Mediation or facilitated settlement discussions can lead to agreements that satisfy most parties and avoid a contested hearing. When settlements are reached, we prepare stipulations and orders that implement the agreed modifications while protecting client interests. Even when negotiations do not result in resolution, they often narrow the issues in dispute and clarify the matters the court will need to decide.
If a petition proceeds to hearing, we present evidence, witness testimony, and legal argument to the court to support the requested modification or reformation. The court then issues an order that may approve, partially grant, or deny the petition. Following an order, we assist with implementing the changes, revising trust documents where necessary, and updating records with financial institutions or title companies. We also advise trustees on required steps and documentation to ensure the court’s order is followed correctly during administration.
At a contested hearing, evidence and witness testimony are presented to establish the basis for modification or reformation. This may include declarants who observed the settlor’s intent, attorneys involved in drafting prior versions, or financial professionals familiar with the trust assets. Clear, credible testimony and documentary proof strengthen a petition and assist the court in making factual findings necessary for relief. Effective presentation focuses on concise, relevant evidence that directly supports the requested change.
After a court grants a modification or reformation, the practical work of implementing the order begins. This can include preparing conforming trust documents, notifying financial institutions and successor trustees, and revising distribution procedures. Trustees must follow the court’s directions and document steps taken to comply with the order. We assist clients with post-order tasks to ensure the trust operates according to the modified terms and to reduce the likelihood of future disputes over administration or interpretation.
Trust modification petitions are typically justified when the written trust does not reflect what the settlor intended due to drafting errors, omissions, or ambiguous language that prevents proper administration. Other common grounds include changed family circumstances such as divorce or the death of a beneficiary, errors discovered after execution, or situations where administrative provisions impede practical management of assets. Courts also consider requests to modify terms that have unintended tax or creditor ramifications, provided legal standards for reformation or modification are met. Each case depends on the trust language and the evidence available to support the requested change. Before filing, it is important to evaluate whether the settlor is still able to amend the trust directly, whether trustee powers allow a nonjudicial remedy, or whether a negotiation among beneficiaries can achieve the same goal without court involvement. If nonjudicial alternatives are not viable, a carefully prepared petition with supporting evidence increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and clarifies expectations for all parties involved.
The length of a trust modification petition process varies depending on case complexity, the number of interested parties, and whether the petition is contested. Uncontested matters that proceed by agreement or stipulated order may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, while contested petitions that require discovery, declaration development, and hearings can take several months to more than a year. Court schedules and local procedural requirements also influence timing. Early case assessment and focused evidence gathering help streamline the process. Clients should plan for potential delays and discuss realistic timelines with counsel, especially when urgent administrative decisions depend on the outcome. Regular communication with the attorney handling the matter can provide updates on critical deadlines and expected next steps throughout the proceeding.
In some circumstances a trustee can make certain administrative changes without court approval, particularly if the trust instrument expressly grants the trustee authority to adjust administrative provisions or to decant assets into a new trust. Decanting and trustee-initiated administrative adjustments may resolve practical problems and avoid court proceedings, but trustees must act within fiduciary duties and verify statutory authority or explicit trust powers before proceeding. When trustee action affects beneficiary rights or when the trust lacks clear authority for decanting, court approval may be necessary to prevent disputes. Trustees should document their reasoning and communicate with beneficiaries to reduce the risk of future challenges. When uncertainty exists about the appropriate path, consulting counsel early helps determine whether nonjudicial avenues are legally sound or whether filing a petition is the safer course to secure an authoritative resolution.
The most persuasive evidence for reformation typically includes prior drafts, contemporaneous correspondence, emails, or witness statements that clearly show the settlor’s intent at the time the trust was executed. Documentation from the drafting attorney, handwritten notes, and communications with family members or financial advisors can demonstrate that a mistake occurred between the settlor’s instructions and the trust’s final language. Medical records may be relevant if capacity is disputed. Providing a coherent timeline and consistent documentary evidence strengthens a petition. Courts generally seek to align the written document with the settlor’s true intentions when the record supports that outcome. Careful collection and organization of evidentiary materials significantly improves the clarity and effectiveness of a petition seeking reformation.
Most filings in probate or superior courts become part of the public record, including petitions to modify or reform trusts, unless the court orders sealed records for particular reasons. Parties concerned about privacy can discuss options with counsel, such as seeking stipulated orders that narrow public disclosure or requesting the court to seal sensitive information when appropriate legal standards are met. While sealing is not guaranteed, taking procedural steps to limit public filings or redact certain personal details can reduce exposure. Clients should balance privacy concerns against the legal benefits of a court order and consult counsel about strategies that minimize public disclosure while achieving necessary relief.
California law requires that interested parties be notified of trust modification petitions so they have an opportunity to appear, object, or consent. Interested parties generally include beneficiaries, co-trustees, and sometimes creditors or persons with potential claims against the trust. Proper service follows statutory rules and includes mailing or personal delivery as required. Timely notice helps prevent jurisdictional challenges and ensures that all parties can protect their rights. Counsel handles preparation and service of notices, tracks deadlines for responses, and can facilitate communication among parties to explore settlement options before a contested hearing.
Whether a settlor can reverse changes made by a trustee through decanting depends on the trust’s terms and relevant state law. If the settlor retains the power to revoke or amend the original trust, they may be able to take corrective steps. However, decanting can sometimes create separate legal structures that complicate reversal, particularly when third parties or beneficiaries have relied on the new terms. When potential reversal is contemplated, it is important to assess the legal instruments involved and any actions taken by trustees or beneficiaries. Early consultation helps determine whether corrective measures through amendment, agreement, or court petition are feasible to restore the settlor’s intended arrangements.
Alternatives to filing a contested petition include negotiating a settlement among interested parties, pursuing a nonjudicial amendment by the settlor when capable, or using trustee powers such as decanting where authorized by the trust or statute. Mediation is another option that can bring parties together to reach a mutually acceptable resolution without the formality of a court hearing. Each alternative has advantages and limitations related to enforceability, privacy, and risk. Parties should weigh the benefits of quicker, private resolutions against the certainty that a court order can provide. Counsel can help evaluate which approach best balances cost, timeline, and the likelihood of a durable outcome.
Tax implications may affect decisions about trust modifications, especially for irrevocable trusts or trusts with tax-sensitive provisions. Changes that alter distribution timing, change beneficiaries, or affect taxable events can have estate, gift, or income tax consequences. Counsel should coordinate with tax advisors to evaluate potential impacts before pursuing modifications. In some cases, the tax cost of pursuing a particular change may outweigh the intended benefits, while in others, modification may prevent larger adverse tax outcomes. A careful review helps ensure that any proposed change achieves estate planning objectives without creating unintended tax exposure.
For an initial consultation about a trust modification, bring the current trust document and any prior drafts, related estate planning documents such as wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives, and any correspondence or notes that reflect the settlor’s intent. If capacity or undue influence is at issue, gather medical records or other documentation that may be relevant. A list of interested parties and their contact information is also helpful. Providing a clear summary of the events or issues that prompted concern allows counsel to evaluate options efficiently and recommend next steps tailored to the client’s objectives and the trust’s particular language.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas