A Heggstad petition can be an important step when trust property was never properly retitled into a trust even though the settlor intended that result. In Deer Park and across Napa County, resolving title problems and confirming that assets belong to a living trust helps preserve the settlor’s plan and prevents future disputes. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients understand whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, how the process works, and what outcomes to expect. This introduction explains the petition’s purpose, the common scenarios that trigger it, and why clear documentation matters for estate planning goals in California.
When a property was conveyed into a trust but the deed was not recorded, a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that transfer and confirm trust ownership. This remedy is typically used to avoid probate for real estate and to align recorded title with the settlor’s intent. For families in Deer Park, the petition can prevent surprises at the time of a settlor’s incapacity or death. Understanding the procedural steps, necessary evidence, and typical timelines helps clients make informed decisions. Our explanation covers what you should gather and what outcomes to expect before filing the petition.
A Heggstad petition protects the integrity of a trust when property transfer paperwork is incomplete or missing from the public record. For individuals and families, the petition reduces the chance that real estate will undergo probate, which can be time-consuming and costly. It also clarifies ownership for title companies, mortgage lenders, and beneficiaries who depend on accurate records. In many situations the petition stabilizes estate administration, allowing trustees to manage or sell property without prolonged controversy. For those focused on preserving privacy and avoiding court-supervised probate administration, the Heggstad remedy can provide a practical and reliable path forward.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to clients across Napa County and the surrounding Bay Area. Our team is familiar with California probate law and the specific procedural requirements for Heggstad petitions, including the documentation and factual showing courts typically require. We work closely with clients to gather deeds, trust instruments, correspondence, and other evidence that shows the settlor’s intent to transfer property to a trust. Our approach emphasizes careful preparation, clear communication, and practical solutions aimed at achieving a timely resolution while minimizing disputes among interested parties.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial proceeding in California used to declare that property belonged to a trust despite the absence of a recorded deed naming the trust. The petition is grounded in proof that the settlor intended to place the property into the trust and that the trust instrument or other contemporaneous documents support that intent. Common supporting evidence includes unrecorded deeds, trust provisions referencing the property, transfer paperwork, escrow records, or communications with title companies. The court considers the facts and issues an order that clarifies ownership, which then allows the trustee to act consistent with the trust terms.
Filing a Heggstad petition typically involves preparation of a petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits establishing the settlor’s intent and the chain of title. Notice to interested parties such as beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors is required so they can respond. The court may set a hearing where evidence is considered, and if the judge finds the factual showing persuasive, the order confirms that the property is trust property. The resulting order can be recorded to correct public records and provide clarity to title companies and subsequent purchasers, avoiding future claims that might otherwise complicate trust administration.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that certain real estate is part of a trust even though the deed is not reflected in public records. It is a remedy for addressing technical defects in title transfer when there is credible evidence the settlor intended the transfer to be into the trust. The petition explains the factual background, attaches the trust instrument and any relevant deeds or escrow documents, and requests the court to enter an order confirming trust ownership. Once granted, the order can be recorded to align the property’s title with the settlor’s documented plan.
Successful petitions generally rely on three categories of proof: the trust instrument showing the settlor’s plan, evidence of an attempted or intended transfer such as an unrecorded deed or escrow instruction, and additional corroborating documentation like correspondence or witness declarations. The procedural process includes preparing the petition, serving notice to interested parties, submitting evidence, and attending a hearing if necessary. Courts examine whether the settlor had the capacity and intent to transfer the property to the trust and whether the evidence supports recognizing that transfer despite the lack of recorded title.
Understanding common legal terms helps clarify the Heggstad petition process. Terms such as settlor, trustee, grant deed, chain of title, probate, and order to correct title frequently appear in filings and court rulings. Familiarity with these words helps clients read documents and participate in discussions about strategy and outcomes. This glossary explains the most frequently used terms and their role in resolving title issues related to living trusts, so you can better follow the procedural steps and know what evidence the court will consider important when reviewing a petition to confirm trust ownership.
A settlor is the person who creates a trust and transfers assets into it for management and distribution according to the trust terms. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the settlor is typically the individual who intended to place a property into their living trust but for some reason the public record does not reflect that transfer. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent and authority is central to the petition, and the trust instrument itself is often the best evidence of how the settlor wanted property handled during incapacity or after death.
An order to correct title is a judicial determination that clarifies who holds legal title to property for recording purposes. When a Heggstad petition is granted, the court issues an order that can be recorded to make the county public records consistent with the trust’s ownership. This order is particularly useful for dealing with title companies, lenders, and potential purchasers who rely on recorded documents, and it reduces the likelihood of future ownership disputes by creating an authoritative public record of the trust’s interest in the property.
A grant deed is a common instrument used to transfer real property in California and the chain of title refers to the recorded history of ownership for a parcel of land. In Heggstad matters, an unrecorded grant deed or discrepancies in the chain of title can create uncertainty about whether property was effectively moved into a trust. Establishing how the transfer was intended to occur, and showing documentation that ties the property to the trust, helps the court reconcile the recorded chain of title with the settlor’s plan.
Probate avoidance refers to estate planning techniques that keep assets out of the court-supervised probate process after death. One of the main reasons clients seek a Heggstad petition is to confirm that real property is trust property so it will pass under the trust without probate administration. The order from a successful petition allows trustees to manage or transfer real estate according to the trust, thereby preserving privacy, saving time, and often reducing estate administration expenses compared with probate proceedings.
When facing unrecorded transfers or title issues, there are several paths to consider. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that property belongs to the trust, while other approaches may include corrective deeds, quiet title actions, or probate administration if ownership is unclear. Corrective deeds can fix recording errors if the parties agree and the circumstances allow, but they may not address past transfers. Quiet title actions resolve disputes about ownership more broadly, and probate may be required when no clear trust remedy applies. Choosing the best approach depends on the facts, the willingness of interested parties to cooperate, and the long-term estate planning goals.
If the issue is a straightforward recording omission where the settlor clearly intended the transfer and all relevant parties consent, a corrective deed or simple administrative recording may suffice to fix title. In such situations, parties can sometimes prepare and record the appropriate documents without formal court involvement, provided there is clear documentation and cooperation among heirs, trustees, and title companies. This route can be quicker and less costly than litigation, but it requires reliable evidence and agreement to ensure the change is recognized by lenders and future purchasers.
When the trust instrument, unrecorded deed, escrow records, or other contemporaneous documentation plainly show the settlor’s intent and other interested parties do not contest the transfer, administrative steps may be enough. Cooperation from beneficiaries or heirs, and support from a title company, can allow a relatively simple resolution that aligns recorded title with trust ownership. Even in these limited cases, careful documentation and proper recording are essential to prevent future challenges and to ensure the trustee can carry out trust duties without interruption.
If heirs, creditors, or other parties dispute ownership or the facts around a transfer, a Heggstad petition or other court proceeding may be necessary to obtain an authoritative determination. Litigation can resolve conflicting testimony, reconcile competing documentation, and provide the formal order needed to clear title. Courts are asked to weigh evidence and make a binding ruling when private agreement is not possible. In those cases, preparing a thorough petition with well-documented evidence is critical to minimizing delays and securing a reliable result for trust administration.
When the chain of title is complicated by lost deeds, multiple transfers, or gaps in documentation, informal fixes may not be sufficient. A court proceeding provides a structured way to present evidence, examine witnesses, and obtain an enforceable order that resolves ambiguity. A Heggstad petition can encompass detailed factual presentation and legal argument showing why the court should recognize trust ownership. This comprehensive approach helps ensure the property can be managed or conveyed with confidence, protecting the interests of trustees and beneficiaries.
A comprehensive approach to resolving title issues brings clarity, finality, and recordable outcomes that protect long-term estate planning objectives. When a court determines property belongs to a trust, the resulting order becomes part of the public record and reduces the risk of future disputes. Comprehensive preparation reduces the likelihood of procedural setbacks, supports smoother trust administration, and strengthens the position of trustees when dealing with title companies or potential buyers. For families seeking certainty and protection of assets, thorough legal workup and formal resolution often pay dividends in time and money saved down the road.
Taking a complete legal path also ensures that all relevant parties receive notice and have the chance to be heard, which further reduces the chance of collateral challenges. Comprehensive filings provide the court with a clear factual record so orders are less vulnerable to reversal or attack. In addition, a well-documented petition can facilitate subsequent transactions involving the property by making title insurers and lenders comfortable with the recorded chain of title, thereby enabling sales, refinances, or other trust-related transfers without unnecessary obstacles.
One major benefit is achieving clarity in title records so trustees can administer the trust without fear of competing claims. When title is corrected through a court order, the trustee gains documented authority to manage, sell, or transfer property according to the trust’s terms. That clarity reduces delays in asset distribution and decreases the administrative burden associated with contested property. Clear title also simplifies interactions with title companies and financial institutions, which typically require unequivocal documentation before allowing conveyances or encumbrances involving trust assets.
A thorough legal resolution lowers the risk that someone will later challenge ownership and trigger new litigation. By providing the court with a complete factual record and obtaining a formal order, the risk of lingering uncertainty diminishes substantially. This stability benefits beneficiaries, trustees, and potential purchasers alike, and can prevent costly and protracted disputes that might otherwise arise when title is clouded. Taking steps to secure a definitive legal remedy therefore protects the integrity of the trust plan and promotes smoother estate administration over time.
Collecting deeds, trust instruments, escrow records, correspondence, and any draft transfer documents early in the process significantly strengthens a Heggstad petition. The court will want a coherent record that links the property to the trust and shows the settlor’s intent. Gathering these materials before filing reduces delays and helps identify gaps that may require additional investigation. Early organization also enables clear communication with title companies and other interested parties, which can facilitate a smoother path toward recordation or judicial correction of title.
Engaging a title company early can identify recording defects and determine what form of remedy will be acceptable for future transactions. Title insurers can advise on documentation that will satisfy their underwriting requirements once a court order is obtained or corrective documents are recorded. Title company involvement helps anticipate obstacles to refinancing or sale and can guide the preparation of the petition so that the resulting order meets industry standards. This coordination reduces surprises when the trustee later seeks to market, encumber, or transfer the property.
Clients pursue a Heggstad petition for several interrelated reasons: to prevent probate for real property, to make title records consistent with the settlor’s trust, and to provide trustees with recorded authority to manage trust assets. When deeds are missing or were never recorded, uncertainty about ownership can impede sales, refinancing, or administration. Seeking a judicial determination preserves the settlor’s intent and helps avoid administrative delays. This remedy is often chosen when informal corrective measures are not feasible or when there is a risk of future disputes among beneficiaries or third parties.
Another common motivation is to protect family privacy and reduce estate administration costs. Probate proceedings are public and can be expensive, while a recorded order recognizing trust ownership keeps matters more private and can simplify distribution according to the trust terms. Additionally, resolving title problems sooner rather than later gives trustees greater flexibility to manage or transfer property when needed, and often reduces the time and expense associated with handling the estate after the settlor’s death or incapacity.
Typical circumstances include deeds that were signed but not recorded, transfers that were handled by escrow but never completed in public records, or situations where multiple transfers created ambiguity in the chain of title. A Heggstad petition may also be necessary when a trustee needs to confirm title after the settlor’s death or when an intended transfer was overlooked during estate planning. In each case, the petition provides a judicial mechanism to reconcile the record with the trust instrument and support efficient administration of trust assets.
This circumstance arises when a deed transferring real estate into a living trust was prepared and possibly executed but never recorded. Even though the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust, the absence of a recorded deed can prevent trustees from acting confidently. A Heggstad petition can establish that the deed or other evidence demonstrates the settlor’s intent and that the property should be treated as trust property, allowing the trustee to manage or dispose of the asset without resorting to probate.
Errors in escrow, mistaken omissions during closing, or clerical mistakes can leave gaps between the settlor’s intent and the public record. When documentation in escrow files or communications indicates the settlor intended a transfer but the title company records do not reflect it, a Heggstad petition offers a means to reconcile those differences. The petition presents the factual history and asks the court to enter an order aligning recorded title with the trust, addressing issues that administrative corrections alone cannot resolve.
If heirs or beneficiaries dispute whether property belongs to the trust, the disagreement can stall administration and create risk of litigation. A Heggstad petition allows the court to evaluate the evidence and issue a binding order clarifying ownership. This reduces the need for protracted contests over property and enables the trustee to proceed with management or distribution in a legally secure manner. The court’s involvement helps ensure fair notice and consideration of competing claims so the trust plan can be implemented effectively.
If you are dealing with unrecorded trust transfers in Deer Park or Napa County, local legal assistance can help you navigate the specific procedural and documentary requirements of a Heggstad petition. We review trust instruments, deeds, escrow files, and related evidence to determine whether a petition is appropriate and to prepare the necessary filings. Our goal is to secure a clear, recordable order that aligns title with the settlor’s intent and supports efficient trust administration. We also guide clients about notice and potential timelines so they know what to expect.
Choosing legal counsel familiar with California trust and probate procedures helps ensure a Heggstad petition is drafted and supported effectively. Our office focuses on estate planning and trust administration, and we know the documents and factual records courts expect to see when evaluating these petitions. We work to gather clear evidence of the settlor’s intent, prepare precise filings, and coordinate notice and service to reduce procedural hurdles. That careful preparation improves the chances of a timely court determination and a recordable order that reflects the trust’s ownership.
We prioritize communication with clients and other interested parties to identify potential objections early and address them constructively. By engaging with title companies, beneficiaries, and heirs as appropriate, we aim to reduce disputes and move the matter toward resolution. Our approach emphasizes practical solutions to align public records with the settlor’s plan, minimize delays, and facilitate estate administration. We also explain the possible outcomes and next steps so you can make informed decisions at every stage of the process.
When a Heggstad petition is necessary, thorough preparation and organized evidence make a meaningful difference. We assist clients in assembling deeds, trust documents, escrow records, and witness statements that support the petition. Our objectives are to obtain a court order confirming trust ownership, enable the trustee to act with confidence, and create recorded documentation that title companies will accept for future transactions. If issues or objections arise, we present a clear factual record to help resolve them efficiently and with attention to preserving the settlor’s plan.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust documents and any deeds or escrow records related to the property. We identify the facts that establish the settlor’s intent, determine which parties must be noticed, and prepare a petition with supporting declarations and exhibits. We handle filing and service, respond to any inquiries from title companies or interested parties, and represent you at any hearings. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines, likely outcomes, and steps needed to obtain a recordable order confirming trust ownership for the property in question.
The initial stage requires compiling all relevant records that connect the property to the trust and demonstrate the settlor’s intent. This includes the trust instrument, executed deeds, escrow files, correspondence, and witness statements that corroborate actions taken around the time of the alleged transfer. Thorough fact-gathering reduces uncertainty, identifies potential gaps, and helps the attorney draft persuasive declarations that present the court with a coherent narrative supporting the petition. Proper document organization also expedites interactions with title companies and other involved parties.
We assist in obtaining copies of trust instruments, grant deeds, escrow instructions, and any related communications that demonstrate the settlor’s plan for the property. This may involve requesting records from prior counsel, title companies, or escrow officers, and interviewing individuals who witnessed the transfer or closing. Accurate and complete documentation is the foundation of a compelling petition, and we help identify and preserve evidence that supports recognition of the property as trust-owned for court review and eventual recording.
We evaluate who must receive notice of the petition, including heirs, beneficiaries, and any parties with recorded interests. Anticipating potential objections allows us to address weaknesses in the record or to secure supporting affidavits in advance. Proper service is essential for a court to enter an order with finality, and we manage the notice process to ensure compliance with statutory requirements. Early assessment of obstacles increases the likelihood of a smooth court process and a conclusive order recognizing trust ownership.
Once the evidence is assembled, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations tailored to the facts of the matter. The filings explain the factual background, attach the trust and any relevant documents, and request a judicial order declaring the property belongs to the trust. We file the petition with the appropriate court, serve the required parties, and handle any follow-up matters such as responses to informal inquiries from interested parties. Our filings aim to present a clear, persuasive record that supports a favorable court order.
Supporting declarations typically explain the factual circumstances around the transfer and attach documentary evidence that ties the property to the trust. Witness or attesting declarations can corroborate escrow activities or the settlor’s intent. Exhibits may include copies of the trust instrument, deeds, escrow statements, correspondence, and other contemporaneous records. Presenting organized and persuasive exhibits helps the judge understand the situation without unnecessary delay and increases the chances that the court will grant the requested order.
After filing the petition, we ensure all required parties are served and follow up on any procedural inquiries or requests for additional information. If an interested party raises objections, we evaluate those concerns and prepare appropriate responses or settlement discussions as needed. Our goal is to keep the process moving efficiently toward a hearing or an agreed resolution, and we handle the procedural and substantive tasks that help secure an order that can be recorded to correct public records.
If the court sets a hearing, we present the evidence and legal argument supporting recognition of the property as trust-owned. When the judge is satisfied by the record, the court issues an order declaring the property belongs to the trust. That order can then be recorded with the county recorder to correct title. Recording provides public notice and assists with future transactions, such as sales or refinances, by aligning the chain of title with the trust’s terms and protecting the trustee’s ability to act.
At the hearing, we summarize the documentary evidence and any witness testimony that supports the petition and address any objections raised by other parties. The objective is to present a coherent factual narrative demonstrating the settlor’s intent to include the property in the trust. Clear presentation of records and legal argument helps the court understand the relief requested and the appropriate form of order to resolve the title issue, enabling the judge to issue a directive that can be recorded and relied upon going forward.
Once the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, we prepare the necessary documents to record that order with the county recorder. Recording the order creates a public record that aligns the property’s title with the trust and informs title companies, lenders, and future purchasers of the court’s determination. This step finalizes the resolution by correcting the chain of title and enabling the trustee to manage or transfer the property in accordance with the trust instrument and the court’s directive.
A Heggstad petition is a court proceeding in California that asks a judge to declare that specific real property should be treated as part of a living trust, even when the deed transferring the property into the trust was never recorded. The petition attaches the trust document and other supporting records and requests a judicial order to correct the public record. It is commonly used when a settlor intended to fund a trust but an administrative or recording oversight left title in the settlor’s name, creating uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries. The petition is appropriate when documentary evidence and contemporaneous records support the claim that the settlor intended the transfer. Examples include executed but unrecorded deeds, escrow instructions showing trust funding, or communications reflecting the settlor’s intent. The court will consider the totality of the evidence and may hold a hearing before issuing an order that can be recorded to correct the chain of title, thereby allowing the trustee to manage or convey the property under the trust’s terms.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the title issue, the completeness of the supporting evidence, and whether any parties object. In straightforward cases with cooperative interested parties and clear documentation, the process may be resolved in a matter of months, allowing sufficient time to file, serve notices, and obtain a court order. More complex matters that involve contested facts, missing records, or multiple interested parties typically take longer and may require additional discovery or hearing dates set by the court. Preparation and thorough document gathering often shorten the overall timeline by minimizing procedural delays. Early coordination with title companies and careful attention to notice and service requirements helps avoid continuances. If objections arise, additional litigation steps may be needed, elongating the process, so anticipating potential challenges and preparing a detailed factual record at the outset is generally the most efficient path to resolution.
Supportive evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust instrument itself, any executed deeds or escrow instructions indicating the intended transfer, closing statements, correspondence with title or escrow officers, and affidavits from witnesses who observed the transaction or closing. These documents help show that the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust and that the failure to record was a technical oversight rather than a change in intent. The petition should present a coherent chain of facts linking the property to the trust. Supplementary evidence can include attorney or escrow files, bank records indicating payment for closing costs, or other contemporaneous records that corroborate the transaction. When possible, witness declarations from individuals involved in the closing or preparation of documents can reinforce the factual narrative. Courts weigh the cumulative evidence, so assembling multiple corroborating records strengthens the petition and increases the likelihood of a favorable order.
A court order from a successful Heggstad petition is strong evidence and can usually be recorded to correct the chain of title, which many title companies will accept. Title underwriters often rely on recorded court orders to clear clouds on title and issue insurance for subsequent transactions. However, acceptance by a particular title company may depend on the specifics of the order, the jurisdiction, and the company’s underwriting guidelines. Close coordination with a title insurer during preparation can help ensure the order will meet underwriting standards. In some instances, title companies may request particular language in the order or additional documentation to satisfy underwriting requirements. Addressing title company concerns early in the process and tailoring the petition and proposed order accordingly increases the likelihood that the insurer will approve the corrected title, enabling sales, refinances, or other property transactions to proceed smoothly after recording.
Yes, notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and any parties with a potential interest in the property is a required step in the Heggstad petition process. Proper service ensures that interested individuals have an opportunity to review the petition and raise objections if they believe the facts are incorrect or that their rights are affected. Courts require notice to provide due process and to ensure that any order entered will have final effect and not be subject to attack on the basis of inadequate notice. Failure to properly notify required parties can lead to continuances or even dismissal, so careful attention to identifying and serving all interested individuals is important. Our process includes identifying those who should receive notice, preparing appropriate service documents, and confirming service so the court record clearly shows that notice requirements were met before a final order is entered.
While the Heggstad petition arises from California case law and is commonly used within the state, the general concept of seeking judicial recognition of an intended trust transfer exists in many jurisdictions under different procedures. For properties located outside Napa County, local court rules and title recording practices may vary, so the exact steps and forms required will differ. For properties within California but outside Deer Park, the underlying legal principles remain similar, but filing location and local procedural requirements must be observed. If your property is outside Napa County, we can coordinate with counsel familiar with the local county recorder and court practices or advise on how the process differs in that jurisdiction. Ensuring compliance with local rules and customs helps avoid procedural setbacks and increases the likelihood of obtaining a recordable order that will be accepted by title companies and other stakeholders in the relevant county.
If someone objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule a hearing to resolve disputed facts. An objection can raise questions about the settlor’s intent, the authenticity of documents, or whether the petitioner provided adequate notice. When objections arise, it becomes especially important to present strong documentary evidence and credible witness testimony to support the petition. In many cases, objections can be addressed through additional evidence or clarification without extensive litigation, but contested matters sometimes require more formal adjudication. Responding to objections may involve exchanging declarations, offering further documentary proof, or conducting discovery to resolve factual disputes. Our role is to prepare a clear factual record and present legal arguments that address the objector’s concerns while protecting the rights of trustees and beneficiaries. The court will weigh the competing evidence and issue a ruling that resolves the dispute and, if warranted, produces an order that can be recorded to correct title.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include corrective deeds, quiet title actions, or, where appropriate, probate administration. A corrective deed may resolve the issue if the parties with an interest agree and there is no question about the settlor’s intent. Quiet title actions address broader disputes about ownership and can be used when competing claims exist. Probate may be necessary when there is no viable trust remedy or when assets must pass through the probate court for other reasons. Selecting the best approach depends on the facts, the degree of cooperation among interested parties, and the desired outcome. A careful review of the documents and stakeholders will indicate whether an administrative correction will suffice or whether a judicial remedy like a Heggstad petition or quiet title action is the most appropriate path to achieve a lasting resolution of title matters.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the facts, the time needed to gather evidence, and whether the matter is contested. Typical expenses include court filing fees, service costs, title company fees for recording the order, and attorney fees for preparing the petition, declarations, and supporting exhibits. In uncontested matters with well-organized documentation, overall costs are generally lower. Contested cases requiring discovery, hearings, or extended litigation can be more costly and take longer to resolve. We provide an initial consultation to assess the situation and outline expected steps and likely costs based on the available evidence and potential objections. Transparent discussion of fees, anticipated expenses, and possible ranges of outcomes helps clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition or exploring alternatives that may be more economical or expedient in their circumstances.
If you think a Heggstad petition may be needed, begin by gathering all relevant documents such as the trust instrument, any deed drafts or executed deeds, escrow records, closing statements, and correspondence relating to the property transfer. Make a list of potential interested parties who may need notice, including beneficiaries, heirs, and any recorded lienholders. This preparation helps a legal professional evaluate the situation efficiently and determine whether a petition is appropriate. Contact our office to schedule a consultation where we will review the documents, assess the strength of the evidence, and recommend the best course of action. We will explain procedural steps, timelines, and likely outcomes, and describe how we will proceed to prepare and file the petition, handle notice requirements, and pursue an order that can be recorded to correct title and support trust administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas