A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool for beneficiaries when a decedent’s assets intended to fund a trust were never formally transferred into that trust. In Napa County, addressing this issue promptly can prevent probate delays and reduce the administrative burden on family members. Our firm provides clear guidance on when a petition is appropriate, how to gather the required documentation, and what the local court will look for when considering whether assets can be treated as having been transferred into a trust. This introduction explains the basics and sets expectations for timelines and likely outcomes in typical Napa trust administration matters.
Many families encounter unexpected complications after a trustmaker’s death when assets remain titled in the deceased’s name rather than the trust. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that those assets should have been in the trust and to direct their transfer accordingly. In Napa, the process involves working with trustees, named beneficiaries, and sometimes third parties holding assets. Understanding the legal standards, gathering proof of intent, and presenting clear evidence are all important steps. This paragraph clarifies when a Heggstad petition can help avoid prolonged probate and supports an orderly transition of assets consistent with the trustmaker’s plans.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the trustmaker’s intentions by correcting title issues without a full probate administration, potentially saving time and cost for heirs and beneficiaries. When the court grants the petition, property that should have been in the trust is recognized as trust property, allowing trustees to distribute and manage assets according to the trust terms. This remedy helps avoid fragmentation of estate administration and reduces the risk of disputes among family members. It also provides legal clarity, which can expedite asset transfer, simplify tax reporting, and protect privacy by limiting public probate proceedings in favor of trust-based distribution.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout Napa and the broader Bay Area, handling trust and estate planning matters with practical attention to detail. Our attorneys guide clients and trustees through the evidence-gathering, petition drafting, and court presentation phases of Heggstad matters, emphasizing clear communication and timely progress. We work with financial institutions, title companies, and family members to assemble the documentation courts require, such as trust instruments, account statements, and affidavits of intent. Our approach balances litigation readiness with a focus on negotiated resolutions where appropriate, always aiming to uphold the trustmaker’s documented wishes and minimize disruption for the family.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to treat certain assets as though they were transferred into a trust, based on the trustmaker’s intent and surrounding circumstances. Courts look at documentary evidence, such as signed trust documents, account statements, beneficiary instructions, and communications that demonstrate an intent to fund the trust. The petition typically includes declarations from trustees or family members and may require notice to interested parties. Understanding the evidentiary standard and the procedural steps helps beneficiaries and trustees prepare a thorough filing, respond to any objections, and present a compelling case for judicial recognition of the transfer.
The outcome of a Heggstad petition may be an order that recognizes title in the trust and directs relevant institutions to transfer assets, or it can be limited to a clarification of rights among parties. In some cases, the court may require further proof or set conditions for transfer. Parties should be prepared for potential contest proceedings if other heirs or creditors raise objections. Early attention to recordkeeping and timely action after a trustmaker’s death can make the process smoother. Working with counsel experienced in local practice can help ensure that filings conform to Napa County court expectations and expedite resolution.
A Heggstad petition is a probate procedure named after a leading case where a court allowed assets to be treated as trust property when evidence showed they were intended for the trust. It is used when tangible or financial assets remain titled in the deceased’s name despite instructions or documentation indicating they were meant to be part of a revocable living trust. The petition explains the discrepancy, presents supporting proof, and asks the court to direct the necessary transfers. This legal mechanism helps align formal title with the trustmaker’s plan, reduces the need for a full probate, and supports orderly trust administration for beneficiaries and trustees.
Successful petitions typically include a clear statement of the trustmaker’s intent, the trust instrument itself, documentation showing the asset was intended for the trust, and declarations or affidavits from those with knowledge of the circumstances. The process starts with assembling records such as account statements, transfer authorization forms, and previously executed documents like pour-over wills or beneficiary designations. Courts also consider the trustee’s plan for distribution and whether there are competing claims. Proper notice to interested parties and compliance with procedural rules are essential, and the petition must present a coherent factual narrative supported by admissible evidence to persuade the court to grant relief.
This short glossary clarifies terms often used in Heggstad matters and trust administration. Understanding vocabulary like grantor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, and transfer-on-death designation helps beneficiaries and trustees follow court proceedings and document preparation. Familiarity with these terms makes it easier to collect the necessary records, communicate with financial institutions, and complete pleadings. Knowing the role each document plays can prevent unnecessary delays and help ensure that the court has what it needs to decide whether assets should be treated as trust property. Accurate terminology is also helpful when coordinating with title companies and other third parties during asset retitling.
The grantor, sometimes called the trustmaker, is the person who creates a trust and sets its terms. They decide which assets to include, name trustees and beneficiaries, and establish instructions for distribution. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the grantor’s documented intent is central: courts evaluate whether the grantor intended certain assets to be part of the trust despite how title appears. Evidence of the grantor’s intent can include the trust instrument, written instructions, communications with financial institutions, and consistent behavior such as managing assets as trust property. Accurate records from the grantor’s lifetime often make Heggstad petitions more straightforward to resolve.
A trustee is the person or institution responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s terms for beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ interests, inventory assets, and distribute property as specified. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee often plays a central role in assembling documentation, providing declarations, and, after court approval, arranging for the transfer of assets into the trust’s name. Trustees should maintain clear records and communicate with beneficiaries and financial institutions to avoid disputes and to demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and the proper administration of trust affairs.
A beneficiary is someone designated to receive benefits from a trust or estate. Beneficiaries may be individuals, charities, or other entities named in the trust instrument. In Heggstad proceedings, beneficiaries often seek to ensure that assets intended for the trust are recognized and available for distribution under the trust terms. Beneficiaries may be required to receive notice of petitions and can sometimes appear in court to support or contest the requested relief. Maintaining open communication with the trustee and reviewing trust documents helps beneficiaries understand their rights and what evidence will support a petition for transfer.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs probate assets to be transferred into a trust upon the grantor’s death. Although a pour-over will can ensure assets ultimately flow to the trust, it typically requires probate to administer estate assets. When assets were intended to be funded into a trust during the grantor’s life but remain titled in the grantor’s name at death, a Heggstad petition may offer a way to treat those assets as trust property without resorting to a full probate administration. Evidence of the pour-over will and other estate planning documents can support a petition and clarify the grantor’s overall plan.
When assets are not properly titled, beneficiaries and trustees face options such as filing a full probate petition, using a smaller limited proceeding, or pursuing a Heggstad petition to have the court recognize the intended trust ownership. Probate can be time-consuming and public, while Heggstad petitions may keep matters within the trust framework and shorten administration time. The right approach depends on case facts, asset types, creditor issues, and potential disputes among heirs. A careful evaluation of risks and benefits helps determine whether a Heggstad petition, a formal probate, or negotiated transfers with institutions will best serve the trustee’s and beneficiaries’ objectives in Napa County.
A limited approach can be appropriate when the assets in question are modest in value and the ownership discrepancy is straightforward to document. If account statements, beneficiary designations, or clear written instructions show the grantor’s intent, a targeted petition or administrative action may resolve the matter without full probate. Financial institutions may accept a combination of the trust document and supporting affidavits to retitle property. This path can save time and expense for families, but it still requires careful assembly of evidence and proper notice to interested parties to avoid challenges or delays in the transfer process.
When all beneficiaries and relevant financial institutions agree that assets should be treated as trust property, informal resolution or limited court filings may complete the transfer without contentious litigation. Clear communication among trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties can facilitate voluntary retitling after presenting the trust instrument and supporting declarations. This cooperative path reduces court involvement and keeps matters private. However, it requires unanimity among interested parties and documented proof of the trustmaker’s intent. If disagreements exist or institutions require a court order, a formal Heggstad petition may still be necessary.
A comprehensive approach is often necessary when assets are complex—such as business interests, retirement accounts, or properties with title complications—or when there are potential competing claims from heirs or creditors. In such situations, thorough legal review and formal court filings help protect beneficiaries’ interests and ensure compliance with procedural requirements. A careful strategy includes investigating account histories, preparing declarations, and coordinating with opposing parties and institutions. The objective is to secure a reliable court order that will be accepted by third parties and withstand challenges, allowing trust administration to proceed without lingering uncertainty.
When documentation is incomplete or there are conflicting indications about the grantor’s intent, a comprehensive legal approach helps build a persuasive record for the court. This may involve collecting correspondence, meeting notes, affidavits from witnesses, and patterns of conduct that indicate how the grantor treated the asset. Presenting a well-organized factual narrative and anticipating likely objections improves the chance of a favorable ruling. Where necessary, formal discovery or additional hearings may be pursued to clarify contested issues and arrive at a judicial determination that reflects the most accurate understanding of the grantor’s intentions.
A comprehensive approach reduces the risk of future disputes by securing a court order that conclusively recognizes trust ownership, which third parties are more likely to accept. It can provide certainty for trustees and beneficiaries, prevent subsequent litigation, and help ensure that transfers are effective for tax and reporting purposes. With a clear judicial determination, title companies and financial institutions will typically cooperate in retitling assets. This level of protection can be especially valuable for complex assets or where there are meaningful creditor concerns, because it reduces ambiguity and supports a smooth transition under the trust terms.
Comprehensive preparation also helps trustees fulfill fiduciary duties by documenting the steps taken to identify and transfer assets properly. Detailed records and court orders reduce future friction among family members and provide a defensible record in the event of disputes. Additionally, a thorough process often results in a more efficient administration overall, as the court’s guidance can settle contested issues early. While a comprehensive approach may involve more up-front effort, the added clarity and protection typically yield longer-term savings of time and stress for those responsible for completing the trustmaker’s estate plan.
Securing a formal court order that recognizes assets as trust property provides stronger legal certainty than informal transfers. This finality helps prevent later disputes and gives trustees confidence in making distributions that comply with the trust terms. For beneficiaries, the order reduces the possibility of future challenges that could reopen asset distribution. Courts in Napa County will consider comprehensive evidence and well-prepared declarations more favorably, which can shorten overall administration and make the outcome more predictable for all involved parties.
Financial institutions and title companies are more likely to accept retitling requests when accompanied by a clear court order recognizing trust ownership. A comprehensive filing anticipates common institutional requirements, such as certified documents and specific declarations, reducing back-and-forth and minimizing delays. Trustees can rely on the court’s determination to instruct banks, brokerage firms, and title agents to change account registrations and property deeds. This coordinated approach streamlines post-death administration and helps ensure assets are available for timely distribution under the trust.
Begin collecting key documents immediately after the trustmaker’s death. Account statements, trust instruments, beneficiary designations, canceled checks, and relevant correspondence can all help demonstrate intent to fund the trust. Early document gathering prevents loss of evidence and reduces delays in preparing a petition. Make copies and keep original records secure, and compile a timeline of actions and communications related to the assets. Clear organization of materials will support a persuasive submission to the court and improve the chance of quick resolution with minimal court intervention.
Collect evidence showing the grantor treated assets as trust property, such as records of account management by the trustee, written instructions, or repeated statements indicating trust funding plans. Patterns of conduct and contemporaneous notes can be persuasive to a court. Obtain sworn statements from witnesses or family members who can attest to the grantor’s intent. Consistent documentation helps bridge gaps where formal title was never changed, and it strengthens the factual narrative presented in a Heggstad petition, increasing the likelihood that the court will recognize the assets as trust property.
You may consider a Heggstad petition if the deceased intended for assets to be held by a trust but clear title transfers were never completed, leaving property in the decedent’s name and subject to probate. This situation can arise with real estate, investment accounts, or bank accounts not retitled before death. A petition asks the court to recognize the trustmaker’s intent and direct the transfer of those assets into the trust, simplifying administration and enabling distribution under the trust terms. Timely action can prevent unnecessary probate, reduce administrative burdens for family members, and align the outcome with the trustmaker’s documented plan.
Another reason to pursue this process is when financial institutions refuse to retitle accounts without a court order, even though the trust instrument clearly indicates the grantor’s intentions. Additionally, when heirs disagree or when creditor concerns exist, obtaining judicial recognition through a petition can provide finality and protect trustees acting in good faith. Using this procedure often results in clearer authority for trustees, allowing them to manage and distribute assets without prolonged uncertainty. It also helps preserve privacy by avoiding broader public probate proceedings when possible.
Typical circumstances include recently established trusts with incomplete funding, assets purchased or titled in the grantor’s name after a trust was created, retirement accounts lacking beneficiary updates, and real property where deeds were not changed. Other situations involve successor trustees encountering accounts or property that financial institutions will not release without a court order. Family members may also file petitions when they learn assets intended for a trust were overlooked at death. Recognizing these common patterns can help trustees and beneficiaries act quickly to assemble evidence and pursue an appropriate remedy.
Assets such as bank accounts, brokerage holdings, or real estate that remain titled in the decedent’s name at death frequently prompt Heggstad petitions. Even when a trust exists, a formal transfer may not have been completed, leaving ownership unclear. Trustees should identify such assets during an estate inventory and gather supporting documents that show the grantor intended these items to be trust property. Bank and brokerage records showing trustee involvement or prior funding attempts can be particularly persuasive for a court evaluating the petition.
Some banks and investment firms require a court order before they will retitle accounts to a trust, even when a trust instrument is provided. In these cases, filing a Heggstad petition can obtain the necessary judicial authorization to effect the transfer. Preparing thorough documentation to meet institutional and court requirements reduces cycles of additional requests and expedites retitling. Trustees should confirm each institution’s procedures early in the process to avoid delays and ensure the petition includes the information most likely to prompt the court to grant relief.
When beneficiaries or potential heirs dispute whether certain assets belong to the trust or the decedent’s estate, a Heggstad petition can provide a judicial determination to resolve the conflict. Courts will weigh the available evidence of intent, including the trust language, witness statements, and account histories, to reach a conclusion. Obtaining a court ruling reduces the likelihood that disagreements will escalate and helps provide a definitive path forward for distribution consistent with the grantor’s plan, protecting both trustees and beneficiaries from future uncertainty.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists families and trustees across Napa County with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. We understand local court procedures and can help prepare the necessary pleadings, declarations, and exhibits to support a petition in Napa. Our team coordinates with trustees, beneficiaries, and financial institutions to assemble the documentation the court and third parties typically require. Whether matters can be resolved cooperatively or require formal court intervention, we work to advance the trustmaker’s intent while keeping clients informed of likely timelines and procedural steps in Napa County.
Choosing representation that is familiar with local practice and trust administration processes helps ensure petitions are filed correctly and efficiently. Our firm brings focused experience in estate planning and trust disputes, and we prioritize clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries to assemble strong factual records. We prepare petitions that address typical evidentiary questions and anticipate potential objections, seeking to obtain court orders that third parties will accept for retitling. Our goal is to minimize delays and support a transition of assets consistent with the grantor’s documented plan while preserving family relationships where possible.
We also emphasize proactive steps such as early document collection and coordination with financial institutions to reduce needless follow-up requests. This preventative approach often shortens the time to resolution by ensuring filings include the records courts expect. Trustees receive guidance on their duties and on compiling declarations that reflect the trustmaker’s intentions. By preparing complete and well-organized submissions, we aim to secure orders that facilitate prompt retitling and distribution under trust terms, helping beneficiaries access assets without unnecessary public probate proceedings.
When contested issues arise, we pursue practical resolution strategies while preserving clients’ rights at court. We present clear factual narratives supported by admissible documentation, and we work to settle disputes where appropriate to avoid protracted litigation. Throughout, we keep clients informed of options, timelines, and likely outcomes so decision-making is based on realistic expectations. Our priority is to achieve durable results that reflect the trustmaker’s wishes and protect the interests of trustees and beneficiaries during asset transfer and trust administration.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust documents and relevant asset records, followed by identification of any title discrepancies that may require court intervention. We gather supporting evidence, draft the petition and declarations, and coordinate with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions to obtain necessary documents. After filing, we serve required notices and respond to any challenges while keeping clients informed of developments. If a hearing is required, we present the factual record to the court and seek an order directing the transfer of assets to the trust, then assist with post-order retitling and implementation steps.
The initial phase focuses on collecting the trust instrument, account statements, deeds, correspondence, and any written instructions that show the grantor’s intent to fund the trust. We assess which assets appear to have been intended for the trust, identify parties with interests, and evaluate the strength of available evidence. This early assessment shapes filing strategy, determines whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, and helps predict potential issues. Clear organization of records at this stage saves time later and establishes a foundation for drafting persuasive declarations and exhibits for the court.
Collecting accurate documentation includes obtaining original trust documents, bank and brokerage statements, property deeds, and any transfer authorization forms. We also look for supporting communications such as letters, emails, or notes that reflect the grantor’s plan. Witness statements from family members or professionals who recall the grantor’s intent can strengthen the case. A thorough evidentiary record at this stage makes it easier to present a coherent narrative to the court and increases the likelihood that financial institutions will cooperate after an order is obtained.
We identify beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, and potential creditors who must be notified or who might object to the petition. Understanding likely objections early allows us to address them in the initial filing. Proper notice and inclusion of relevant party details reduce the risk of procedural delays. When disputes are likely, we prepare declarations and documentary evidence that directly respond to anticipated arguments, helping the court reach a reasoned conclusion and avoiding unnecessary hearings where possible.
After assembling evidence, we draft the petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits to present the factual basis for treating the assets as trust property. The filing explains the discrepancy between title and intent, outlines the documentary support, and requests a court order directing transfer. We ensure compliance with Napa County’s procedural rules and file the documents with the appropriate probate department. This stage also involves arranging service on required parties and preparing for any initial court inquiries or objections that may arise following filing.
Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who can attest to the grantor’s intent are compiled alongside documentary exhibits. Exhibits often include the trust instrument, account histories, and correspondence showing the grantor’s intent to fund the trust. Presenting a well-documented record helps the court evaluate the merits of the petition and gives financial institutions the assurance they need to comply after an order is entered. Clear, organized exhibits reduce the need for additional discovery and help move the matter toward resolution.
Once the petition and supporting materials are complete, we file them with the Napa County probate court and serve required notices to beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors as appropriate. Proper service is essential to preserve the court’s jurisdiction and to allow interested parties the opportunity to respond. Timely and accurate service practices reduce procedural challenges and position the petition for efficient consideration by the court. We track deadlines and follow up on any filing requirements to avoid unnecessary delays in the court’s review process.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the evidence and explain why the assets should be treated as trust property. The court may issue an order recognizing the trust ownership and directing institutions to transfer or retitle assets. After obtaining the order, we assist trustees in presenting it to banks, title companies, and other entities to effect retitling and implement distributions under the trust. We also prepare any follow-up filings or record updates needed to finalize administration and ensure the transition of assets is completed in accordance with the court’s directives.
At any required hearing, we explain the documentation and witness testimony that supports treating assets as trust property. The court evaluates whether the trustmaker intended the transfer and whether the evidence meets applicable standards. When the court finds the record persuasive, it issues an order directing the transfer or recognizing the trust’s ownership. This order provides the authority trustees need to present to financial institutions and title companies, facilitating retitling and distribution according to the trust’s terms and reducing the need for additional court involvement.
After obtaining a court order, we work with trustees and institutions to implement retitling, update property records, and complete any required filings. This involves supplying certified copies of orders, assisting with deed preparation, and coordinating with banks and brokerage firms to change account registrations. We also advise trustees on proper distribution and recordkeeping to ensure that trust administration proceeds smoothly. Completing these steps carefully helps prevent future disputes and ensures that asset transfers reflect the trustmaker’s documented plan.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the decedent’s name. It is appropriate when the trustmaker clearly intended the assets to belong to the trust but formal title changes were not completed before death. Filing is considered when informal retitling with institutions is not possible or when a formal court order will provide the necessary authority for trustees to manage and distribute assets under the trust’s terms. Preparing a petition requires gathering the trust document, account records, and supporting declarations to demonstrate intent and the factual basis for the requested relief.
A Heggstad petition is narrower than a full probate administration because it seeks recognition that specific assets are trust property rather than initiating a general probate estate process. Probate typically involves appointing an executor, inventorying estate assets, paying creditors, and distributing property under a will, which can be time-consuming and public. By contrast, a Heggstad petition aims to keep matters within the trust framework and avoid full probate where possible. However, if significant creditor claims or other estate issues exist, probate may still be necessary, so the appropriate path depends on the specific facts and the types of assets involved.
Courts look for convincing evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and a factual record showing why the asset should be treated as trust property. Useful evidence includes the trust instrument, account statements or deeds reflecting the asset, correspondence or instructions indicating the grantor’s plan, and declarations from witnesses or trustees describing relevant circumstances. The strength of the documentation and consistency of the grantor’s actions are important. Presenting a well-organized set of exhibits and declarations that tie documentary records to the grantor’s intent increases the likelihood the court will grant the petition and direct the retitling of the assets into the trust.
A court order obtained through a Heggstad petition generally gives trustees stronger authority to present to financial institutions and title companies for retitling. Many institutions are more willing to accept a judicial determination than informal documents alone. However, institutional policies vary, and some organizations may require additional certifications or procedures even after an order is issued. Working with counsel to provide the exact documents institutions require, such as certified copies of the order and supporting trust materials, helps ensure compliance and smoother retitling after the court’s decision.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the evidence, whether objections are filed, and local court scheduling. Simple, uncontested matters with clear documentation can resolve more quickly, potentially within a few months, while contested or complex cases may take longer. Gathering records and preparing the petition typically takes several weeks, followed by court processing and any required hearings. Local practice in Napa County influences scheduling, so early assessment and prompt assembly of evidence help shorten the overall timeline and allow trustees and beneficiaries to plan accordingly.
Yes, heirs or creditors can object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the assets belong to the decedent’s estate or if they dispute the evidence of intent. Courts provide interested parties an opportunity to respond to petitions, and objections may lead to hearings or additional discovery. Preparing a petition with thorough documentation and declarations that anticipate common objections reduces the chance of successful challenges. When disputes arise, the court weighs the totality of the evidence to determine whether the assets should be treated as trust property based on the grantor’s documented intent and surrounding circumstances.
Costs vary depending on the complexity of the matter, the need for hearings, and whether disputes arise that require additional litigation or discovery. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs of preparing declarations and exhibits, and legal fees for drafting and presenting the petition. When matters are uncontested and institutions accept the court’s order readily, costs tend to be lower. More complex or contested proceedings, involving multiple parties or detailed evidentiary work, can increase the overall expense. Discussing likely scenarios with counsel early helps estimate costs and plan strategy within budget considerations.
A trustee can file a Heggstad petition without the agreement of all beneficiaries when they have a legitimate basis to seek court recognition of trust ownership. Proper notice to interested parties is required, and beneficiaries will have an opportunity to respond. Where beneficiaries object, the matter may proceed to hearing to resolve the dispute. Filing without unanimous consent is sometimes necessary to protect trust administration and ensure assets are handled in accordance with the trustmaker’s documented plan, but it requires careful preparation to address potential opposition and comply with procedural rules.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the assets in question may remain part of the decedent’s probate estate and could require alternative proceedings such as probate administration or negotiated settlement. The denial may reflect insufficient evidence of the grantor’s intent or unresolved disputes among parties. After a denial, parties can consider whether additional evidence or different legal avenues might support relief, such as pursuing probate with a pour-over will, negotiating with institutions, or seeking settlement agreements. Counsel can evaluate next steps to protect beneficiaries’ interests and consider whether an appeal or new petition is appropriate.
To reduce the likelihood of needing a Heggstad petition, grantors should take proactive steps to fund trusts during their lifetimes, including retitling real property, updating account registrations, and confirming beneficiary designations. Maintaining clear records of funding efforts and keeping copies of correspondence with financial institutions helps document intent. Trustees and family members should also know where key documents are stored and ensure successor trustees understand their duties. These preventive measures minimize title issues at death and help ensure the trust functions as intended without requiring additional court proceedings to align title with the trust terms.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas