A Heggstad petition can resolve problems when assets meant for a trust were never formally transferred during life. In Nevada City and elsewhere in California, these petitions are used to ask the court to treat property as if it had been placed into a revocable living trust, so the trustee can manage or distribute it according to the trust terms. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in preparing clear petitions that show the property owner intended the assets to belong to the trust, and that moving them into the trust now serves the estate plan and the best interests of beneficiaries.
People discover Heggstad issues for many reasons, including overlooked deeds, retirement accounts not retitled, or assets that were intended to be covered by a pour-over will but never transferred. Addressing these gaps promptly can prevent probate delays and preserve privacy. Our firm in San Jose and Northern California reviews trust documents, deeds, and account records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, and then prepares the needed declarations and supporting evidence. We aim to provide practical, court-ready pleadings that explain the factual and legal basis for treating property as trust assets under California law.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the intent of a decedent or settlor by asking a California court to recognize property as part of a trust even when formal transfer steps were missed. That recognition can avoid probate, reduce administrative delays, and ensure that trust terms govern distribution and management. For families in Nevada City, this approach protects beneficiary interests and keeps sensitive affairs private. The petition also provides a clean legal path for trustees to access and manage assets without uncertainty. The process is particularly valuable when deeds, beneficiary designations, or account registrations are inconsistent with the settlor’s documented plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California, including Nevada City residents, on matters involving trusts, wills, and related petitions. Our team focuses on careful review of trust instruments, deeds, beneficiary forms, and financial records to build a factual record that supports a Heggstad petition when appropriate. We provide clear guidance about potential outcomes, court timelines, and the documentation necessary to prove trust ownership. Clients receive straightforward communication about the legal standards and practical steps involved, and our goal is to minimize disruption while securing the trust-based disposition of assets.
A Heggstad petition is a legal remedy under California practice used to treat property as having been transferred to a trust when the transfer was intended but not completed. The petitioner typically must show written evidence of the settlor’s intent and facts demonstrating the asset was meant to be trust property. Courts evaluate declarations, contemporaneous documents, deeds, and account statements to determine whether the property should be deemed part of the trust. This avenue is often preferable to full probate because it can allow the trust’s terms to control distribution and administration, preserving privacy and often saving time and expense for beneficiaries.
Not every instance of a missed transfer qualifies for a Heggstad petition, and outcomes depend on the particular facts and available evidence. Common situations that lead to petitions include deeds left in a decedent’s name, beneficiary forms inconsistent with trust language, or assets that the settlor intended to be covered by a pour-over will but which did not transfer automatically. Preparing a convincing petition requires careful collection of supportive documents and declarations from individuals with knowledge of the settlor’s intent. The court then weighs whether treating the asset as part of the trust aligns with the settlor’s estate plan and applicable law.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to recognize property as trust property despite formal transfer omissions, based on the settlor’s intent and supporting evidence. Its name comes from case law that authorizes courts to correct failures in transferring assets to a trust when the intent to make those assets trust property is clear. The petition typically includes declarations, copies of trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any written indications of intent. Courts consider these materials to determine whether the asset should be administered under the trust and whether the trustee has authority to manage, sell, or distribute the property under the trust terms.
Successful petitions generally include a clear statement of facts showing the settlor intended the asset to be in the trust, documentary evidence such as a trust instrument and related account or deed records, and legal argument tying the facts to applicable law. The process begins with document review and evidence gathering, followed by drafting the petition and supporting declarations. The court may set a hearing and allow interested persons to respond. If the court grants the petition, the order will state that the property is to be treated as trust property and identify how it should be administered consistent with the trust terms.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petitions helps clients follow the process and the court’s decision. This section explains common phrases and legal references you will encounter when discussing trust asset transfers, petitions, and orders. Clear definitions reduce confusion about roles such as settlor and trustee, and clarify documents like deeds, pour-over wills, and trust certifications. Knowing these terms makes it easier to collect relevant evidence and to understand the practical effects of a court order recognizing property as trust-owned. Use this glossary as a quick reference while preparing for or responding to a petition.
The settlor is the individual who created the trust and placed assets under its terms. In Heggstad matters, the settlor’s intent is central to the court’s evaluation, and statements or documents reflecting that intent carry weight. Evidence of intent can include the trust document language, contemporaneous notes, communications, or actions that show the settlor intended particular property to be governed by the trust. When a settlor fails to retitle assets properly, a Heggstad petition seeks to align legal ownership with that original intent so the trustee can carry out the trust’s provisions for management and distribution.
A petition to treat property as trust asset is the pleading filed in probate court that requests a judicial determination that specific property should be administered as part of a trust. The petition sets forth facts, attaches supportive documents, and asks the court to issue an order declaring the asset belongs to the trust or that the trustee has the power to manage it. The petition is often used where formal transfer documents are missing or where the legal title is inconsistent with the settlor’s documented estate plan.
The trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust property pursuant to the trust document’s directions. When a Heggstad petition is granted, it clarifies the trustee’s authority over assets that were not formally titled in the trust’s name. That authority can include managing investments, selling property, paying debts, and distributing assets to beneficiaries according to the trust. Clear judicial recognition helps trustees act with confidence and reduces the risk of disputes over asset control or the validity of trustee actions taken to administer the estate.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets remaining in a decedent’s name at death to be transferred into a designated trust. When assets intended to be covered by a pour-over will are not automatically retitled or otherwise transferred, a Heggstad petition may be an appropriate remedy to effectuate the settlor’s overall estate plan. The petition asks the court to treat those assets as trust property so that the trust’s distribution scheme applies, avoiding separate probate administration of the assets and preserving the settlor’s plan of distribution.
When property that should belong to a trust remains out of trust, the available options can include filing a Heggstad petition, pursuing full probate, or negotiating transfers with account custodians or title holders. A Heggstad petition can be faster and more private than probate, but it requires sufficient evidence of intent and may involve contested hearings if heirs disagree. Probate is a formal court process that administers assets in a decedent’s estate but may take more time and become public. Choosing the best approach depends on the property type, the strength of supporting documentation, and the family dynamics surrounding the estate.
A limited approach, such as a focused Heggstad petition or dealing directly with a title company, can be sufficient when there is clear written evidence showing the settlor intended the asset to be held in the trust. Documents like the trust instrument, deeds referencing the trust, or contemporaneous correspondence can make a concise petition effective. When facts are straightforward and there is minimal likelihood of contestation, a short, well-supported filing may resolve the issue without prolonged litigation, while preserving the trust’s disposition and minimizing cost and delay for beneficiaries.
If family members and beneficiaries agree about the settlor’s intent and support transferring assets into the trust, a limited approach can streamline results. Cooperation reduces the risk of contested hearings and may allow for quicker filing and fewer evidentiary disputes. Where all interested parties consent or do not object, the court process can proceed more smoothly, and trustees can take necessary steps to administer the property under the trust terms. Nevertheless, thorough documentation should still be assembled to satisfy the court and protect trustee actions against later challenges.
A comprehensive approach is wise when asset titles are complex, multiple accounts have conflicting beneficiary designations, or deed records are unclear. In these cases, gathering extensive documentation, preparing detailed declarations, and pursuing broader court relief can ensure that all ownership issues are resolved. A thorough review may reveal the need for additional petitions, corrections of title, or coordination with financial institutions. When records do not plainly support treatment as trust property, a more robust legal plan prepares for potential objections and helps protect trustee and beneficiary rights over the long term.
When heirs or beneficiaries dispute the intent behind transfers or the validity of trust provisions, a comprehensive legal strategy is necessary to address contested issues in court. That strategy includes investigating facts, preparing declarations from witnesses, and developing legal arguments that establish why the property should be viewed as trust assets. Contested matters may require discovery, hearings, or negotiation, and carefully constructed pleadings help the court evaluate competing contentions. Comprehensive preparation is important to reduce the risk of post-judgment challenges and to secure a stable resolution that advances the settlor’s plan.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad petitions and related trust issues increases the likelihood that the court will accept the factual record and rule in favor of treating the property as trust-owned. Detailed documentation and careful legal argument reduce ambiguity, help answer creditor or beneficiary inquiries, and provide a stronger foundation for trustee actions. For Nevada City clients, this approach can prevent future disputes by producing clear court orders and supporting records. It is particularly helpful when assets are substantial, ownership is disputed, or the documentation of intent is indirect and requires corroboration.
Another important benefit of thorough preparation is protection for the trustee and beneficiaries. A well-documented petition and supporting materials give trustees confidence to administer trust assets, make distributions, and resolve debts without fear of later claims. Comprehensive filings can also address multiple assets at once, coordinate corrective steps with financial institutions, and produce court orders that simplify future administration. This level of care helps maintain the settlor’s intended plan and reduces administrative burden and costs over time by minimizing the chance of subsequent litigation.
Creating a strong evidentiary record supports the court in issuing clear orders that describe which assets are now trust property and the trustee’s authority to act. This clarity reduces ambiguity that could spark future disputes among heirs or require additional litigation. By documenting intent and the chain of title carefully, the petition helps ensure that the trustee’s subsequent management and distributions are protected from challenge. In practice, a clear order also simplifies interactions with banks, title companies, and other institutions that must recognize the trustee’s authority to access or transfer assets.
Comprehensive legal work reduces the likelihood of future litigation by addressing potential objections and documenting the factual and legal basis for treating assets as trust property. That preventive approach shortens administrative timelines, helps avoid contested probate proceedings, and makes it easier for trustees to finalize estate matters efficiently. When the court record anticipates common challenges, the trust’s administration proceeds more smoothly and beneficiaries receive distributions with less delay. This reduces stress and financial uncertainty for family members during an already difficult time.
Start assembling relevant documents as soon as you suspect a missed transfer, including trust instruments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, correspondence, and any notes reflecting the settlor’s intent. Early collection prevents delays and helps preserve evidence that might otherwise be lost. Gathering complete records also allows counsel to assess whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed and to prepare a thorough declaration. Prompt action reduces the time needed for research and court preparation and increases the chances of a decisive, favorable outcome that puts property under the trust’s control.
Contact banks, brokerage firms, and title companies early in the process to determine their documentation requirements for transferring accounts or deeds to the trust. Some institutions may accept court orders or affidavits, while others require additional paperwork. Understanding institutional procedures helps avoid surprises and facilitates a smoother transfer once a court order is obtained. Professional coordination reduces the risk of administrative setbacks after the petition is granted and ensures that trustee instructions can be implemented promptly to manage, sell, or distribute assets according to the trust terms.
Consider a Heggstad petition when property that should be in a trust remains titled outside the trust, as this remedy can align legal title with the settlor’s documented intent and avoid unnecessary probate. Petitions are often appropriate when deeds, beneficiary designations, or account registrations do not reflect the trust plan, or when a pour-over will leaves assets that did not transfer automatically. The petition helps preserve privacy, speed administration, and allow the trust’s terms to guide management and distribution. Early assessment can identify whether the petition or another remedy is the best route.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to provide trustees with clear legal authority to act, which may be necessary for selling property, accessing accounts, or resolving debts. Without court recognition, third parties may refuse to cooperate, resulting in administrative delays. A properly prepared petition produces an order that clarifies ownership and reduces the risk of disputes with heirs or creditors. For families in Nevada City and across California, the ability to enforce the settlor’s plan through a court order often outweighs the cost and time of the filing process.
Typical circumstances include deeds left in the decedent’s name, retirement accounts not retitled, bank or brokerage accounts without proper beneficiary designations, and property that a pour-over will was intended to cover but did not. Other scenarios arise when a settlor moved residences without updating title or when closing statements and financial records show intent to include assets in the trust but the formal transfer steps were incomplete. Recognizing these patterns early helps determine whether a petition can effectively correct the title and align administration with the trust.
When real estate remains titled in the decedent’s individual name despite the existence of a trust, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare the property part of the trust based on the settlor’s intent. This is common when owners believed the property was already covered by their estate plan but neglected to execute a new deed. The petition includes deeds, trust copies, and supporting declarations to show the transfer was intended. A favorable order allows the trustee to manage or sell the property without separate probate.
Financial accounts such as bank, brokerage, or retirement accounts sometimes remain in the deceased’s name because retitling was overlooked. If the account holder intended those assets to be controlled by the trust, a petition can seek judicial recognition so the trustee may access funds or change account ownership. Supporting documentation like account statements, beneficiary forms, and trust provisions helps establish intent. The court’s declaration then provides the evidence institutions often require to accept trustee authority and complete transfers or distributions.
A pour-over will is designed to funnel remaining assets into a trust, but some items may not transfer smoothly at death. When assets intended to pour into the trust remain outside it, a Heggstad petition can help effect that transfer by asking the court to treat those assets as trust property. The petition documents the settlor’s estate plan and the factual reasons why the automatic transfer did not occur, enabling the trust to govern distribution and preventing separate probate administration of those assets.
Residents of Nevada City can rely on experienced counsel in trust and estate matters to evaluate potential Heggstad petition claims and pursue appropriate remedies. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman reviews documents, explains options, and prepares court filings tailored to the local probate rules and judicial practices. We communicate clearly about likely timelines, evidence needs, and possible outcomes so clients know what to expect. Our approach emphasizes practical solutions that honor the settlor’s intent while minimizing delays and interference with trust administration.
Choosing counsel experienced in trust and probate proceedings matters because careful preparation affects outcome. Our firm focuses on assembling the needed records, drafting persuasive declarations, and presenting the legal arguments that align the facts with California law. We prioritize clear communication so you understand each step of the process, including document collection, filing deadlines, and possible hearings. For clients in Nevada City and surrounding areas, this measured approach aims to secure a court order that places assets under the trust and enables efficient administration without unnecessary conflict.
We also work proactively with financial institutions, title companies, and other parties to facilitate transfers once the court order issues. That coordination helps translate legal results into practical outcomes, allowing trustees to gain access to accounts, retitle assets, or complete sales as permitted by the trust. By handling both the court filings and the post-order administrative steps, the firm supports a seamless transition of property into trust administration and reduces the administrative burden on families dealing with estate matters.
Client-focused service includes careful attention to confidentiality, respectful handling of sensitive family matters, and clear explanation of costs and timing. We provide realistic assessments of likely results and prepare clients for potential responses from interested parties. When disputes arise, we pursue efficient resolution while protecting beneficiary interests and the settlor’s documented plan. Our goal is to secure a stable legal foundation for trust administration so families can move forward with clarity and confidence during a difficult time.
Our process begins with an intake and document review to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We identify relevant records, assess the strength of evidence showing the settlor’s intent, and advise on the likely scope of relief. Next, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, file in the appropriate probate court, and notify interested persons. If objections arise, we respond with additional evidence and legal argument. After the court issues an order, we assist with implementing the order by coordinating transfers and working with institutions to retitle assets in the trust name.
The first step focuses on collecting trust documents, deeds, account records, beneficiary forms, and any contemporaneous writings that show the settlor intended particular assets to be held in the trust. We interview relevant witnesses and prepare declarations that explain the facts surrounding each asset. This preparation builds the factual foundation required in a petition so the court can evaluate the settlor’s intent and the reasons the asset remained out of trust. Thorough documentation at this stage streamlines later filing and improves the clarity of the petition.
We identify and gather relevant documents including the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds, title history, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence that supports intent. Each document is reviewed for consistency with the trust and to detect possible issues. This stage may require requesting records from financial institutions or title companies and interviewing family members who can attest to the settlor’s intentions. A careful compilation of records forms the backbone of a persuasive petition that explains why the property should be treated as trust-owned.
Alongside documentary evidence, declarations from those with firsthand knowledge are drafted to narrate the settlor’s intent and the circumstances of the missed transfer. These declarations explain relevant facts, such as conversations, prior planning steps, or actions that demonstrate intent. The combined package of declarations and documents is assembled to present a coherent, chronological account that supports the legal request to treat the asset as part of the trust. Clear, consistent evidence is essential for persuading the court of the proper remedy.
After preparing the petition and supporting documents, we file in the appropriate probate court and serve interested parties according to court rules. The filing includes a clear statement of requested relief and the evidence supporting it. Interested parties may file responses or objections, which we evaluate and address through additional declarations or legal briefing. If a hearing is scheduled, we present the factual record and legal argument on your behalf. The goal is to secure an order that treats specified property as trust assets and authorizes the trustee to act accordingly.
Proper filing requires compliance with local probate rules and precise service on all parties who might have an interest in the asset. We prepare the required forms, file them with the court clerk, and arrange service by mail or other authorized methods. Accurate service and adherence to procedural rules are essential to avoid delays or challenges to the petition. Clear notice allows interested persons an opportunity to respond and facilitates a fair resolution while protecting the integrity of the court process.
If objections arise, we evaluate their merits and respond with additional evidence, declarations, or legal argument, and we seek to negotiate where appropriate. Some disputes can be resolved by clarifying facts or providing documents that corroborate the settlor’s intent. When negotiation is not possible, we present the court with a full evidentiary showing at hearing. Our aim is to resolve contested issues efficiently while preserving the chances of securing an order that places the asset in the trust and protects trustee and beneficiary interests.
If the court grants the petition, the order will identify the asset as trust property and authorize the trustee to manage or distribute it according to the trust. We assist by preparing the certified order, coordinating with banks or title companies, and taking steps to retitle accounts or real property. This post-judgment phase translates legal victory into practical results so the trustee can carry out the trust plan. We follow through to ensure institutions accept the court order and complete transfers or distributions in line with the trust.
Once the court issues its order, we obtain certified copies and send them to relevant institutions to effectuate transfers or allow trustee access. Banks, brokerages, and title companies often require a certified order to retitle accounts or accept trustee directions. We handle that coordination and address any administrative requirements. Clear documentation and direct communication with institutions reduce the risk of post-order delays and ensure that the trustee can manage trust assets without further procedural hurdles.
With the court order recognized, we help implement necessary transfers, retitling, or sale of assets as allowed by the trust terms. We work with financial institutions and title services to complete paperwork, and we advise trustees on fulfilling fiduciary duties while distributing assets to beneficiaries. Completing these administrative tasks finalizes the corrective process and enables trust administration to proceed according to the settlor’s instructions. Our assistance extends to recordkeeping and guidance to reduce the chance of subsequent disputes.
A Heggstad petition is a court request asking a probate court to treat specific property as trust property despite the absence of formal transfer documentation. It is typically used when an individual created a trust but some assets were left titled in the decedent’s name or otherwise not retitled into the trust as intended. The petition presents evidence of the settlor’s intent and asks the court to issue an order declaring the asset to be part of the trust so the trustee can manage or distribute it according to the trust terms. The petition is commonly employed to avoid separate probate administration and to keep asset disposition private under the trust’s provisions. Success depends on the strength of the evidence and the clarity of the settlor’s intent. Courts evaluate documents, declarations, and account records to determine whether the requested remedy faithfully implements the settlor’s estate plan and whether treating the asset as trust property aligns with applicable law.
A Heggstad petition seeks judicial recognition that a specific asset should be treated as trust property, while probate is the formal court process that administers a decedent’s estate when assets are not otherwise transferred by trust or beneficiary designation. Heggstad petitions are narrower and focus on aligning title with a trust, often avoiding the broader and public probate process. Probate administers all estate affairs under court supervision, which can be time-consuming and public, whereas a successful petition can allow the trust to govern disposition instead. Choosing between a petition and probate depends on the assets involved, the available documentation, and the likelihood of disputes. Where evidence supports a petition and heirs are not strongly opposed, a Heggstad petition can achieve results more privately and efficiently than full probate, but each matter requires case-specific evaluation to determine the best path.
Evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust instrument and any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence showing the settlor’s intent, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to planning discussions or actions. The goal is to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the settlor intended the property to be trust-owned. Documentation that ties the asset to the trust or demonstrates planning steps toward transferring it is particularly valuable. In some matters, forensic review of title history or financial institution records can reveal steps taken toward transfer that were never completed. Declarations that describe conversations and the settlor’s consistent planning behavior help the court assess intent, and thorough assembly of such materials strengthens the petition and reduces the risk of contested outcomes.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on the complexity of the asset title, the court’s schedule, and whether objections are filed. A straightforward petition with cooperative parties and clear documentation may be resolved in a matter of weeks or a few months, while contested matters or those requiring additional discovery can take longer. Factors such as the need to obtain records from financial institutions or to correct deed issues also affect timing. Local probate court calendars and the need for hearings influence the schedule, so early preparation is important. Communicating with the court clerk, promptly serving interested parties, and providing full documentation at filing can help expedite the process. Where disputes arise, negotiation and additional declarations may extend the timeline before a final order issues.
A Heggstad petition cannot automatically guarantee transfer in every case, but a successful court order does direct that the property be treated as trust property and often provides sufficient authority for institutions and title companies to process transfers. The court’s ruling clarifies ownership for the purposes of trust administration, and certified copies of the order are used to retitle assets or gain access to accounts. Institutions generally accept a clear court order as the legal basis for change, though they may also request supporting documents. In some situations additional administrative steps are required after the order issues, such as submitting certified copies, completing institutional forms, or clearing defects in title. The firm assists with these post-order tasks to help translate the court’s decision into practical transfers and to ensure that trustee authority is recognized and implemented.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested persons can object to a Heggstad petition. Objections may raise questions about the settlor’s intent, the sufficiency of the evidence, or competing claims to the property. When objections are filed, the court may hold a hearing to evaluate the contested issues, and additional evidence or testimony may be required. A well-prepared petition aims to anticipate likely objections by presenting persuasive documentation and declarations to support the requested relief. If objections cannot be resolved through discussion or additional evidence, the matter proceeds to judicial resolution. Preparing a thorough factual record and clear legal argument increases the chances of favorable resolution and can reduce the scope of contested issues, helping the court reach a decision that aligns with the settlor’s plan and legal standards.
Heggstad petitions commonly address deeds for real estate left in the decedent’s name, bank or brokerage accounts not retitled, retirement accounts with conflicting beneficiary designations, and other assets that the settlor intended to be managed by the trust. Durable or financial instruments that were not properly updated at the time of a change in circumstances may require court action to place them under trust control. The variety of assets reflects the importance of reviewing all potential holdings when assessing a trust’s completeness. Each asset type may present unique evidence requirements and administrative steps. For real property, title history and deeds are central; for accounts, statements and beneficiary forms matter. The petition process tailors the evidence gathering to the asset type and seeks an order that enables the trustee to exercise the trust’s authority over the identified property.
Financial institutions generally accept a certified court order as the legal basis for retitling or granting trustee access, though practices vary among institutions. Some banks and brokerages will request additional documents such as a certified copy of the trust, trustee identification, and specific institutional forms. Title companies may also require record updates and completion of deed forms in accordance with the court order. Anticipating these requirements and providing complete documentation speeds institutional compliance. When institutions request further paperwork, coordination is needed to complete their forms and meet internal procedures. Assistance in liaising with institutional representatives can smooth the process and reduce delays in transferring or accessing assets after a Heggstad order issues.
Costs associated with filing a Heggstad petition vary with the complexity of the matter, the number of assets involved, and whether objections arise. Typical costs include court filing fees, potential service fees, and professional fees for preparing the petition, declarations, and supporting documents. A straightforward petition with clear documentation and no objections generally costs less than a contested matter requiring additional evidence or hearings. The firm provides an initial assessment and cost estimate after reviewing the facts so clients can make informed decisions. When disputes occur, additional time and resources may be needed and fees can increase accordingly. We discuss likely scenarios and associated costs in advance, aim for efficient preparation, and advise on steps that may reduce overall expense while preserving the chances of obtaining the requested relief.
To start the process for a Heggstad petition in Nevada City, gather trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence that shows the settlor’s intent. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to schedule an initial review so counsel can assess whether a petition is appropriate. During the intake we will identify missing records, interview relevant witnesses, and outline the documentation needed to prepare a convincing petition for the probate court. After the initial review, we advise on likely timelines, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and handle court filing and service. We work to coordinate post-order implementation with institutions to ensure that the court’s decision results in the practical transfer or recognition of assets under the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas