A Heggstad petition can be essential when an asset intended for a trust was mistakenly transferred to an individual’s name instead of the trust before the grantor’s passing. This legal tool helps confirm that the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust, allowing courts to place the property into the trust so the trustee can administer it according to the trust terms. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist families in Cypress and throughout Orange County by preparing and filing petitions, gathering required evidence, and presenting arguments to the probate court to establish the trust’s ownership of misdirected assets.
When trust-funded assets are overlooked or titled incorrectly, beneficiaries may face delay, added expense, and uncertainty. A Heggstad petition addresses those problems by offering a clear path to resolve title issues without resorting to a full probate proceeding. The process typically involves drafting pleadings, compiling contemporaneous documentation and testimony, and demonstrating to the court that the decedent intended the property for the trust. Our approach focuses on thoughtful preparation and calm advocacy, guiding families through each step while protecting estate plan goals and minimizing court involvement whenever possible.
A Heggstad petition provides a practical remedy when assets intended for a trust were not properly retitled before the grantor’s death. Filing this petition can avert lengthy probate procedures, reduce administration costs, and ensure that trust distribution instructions are honored. The petition offers a focused court review to determine whether the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust, using written documents and witness testimony to support that intent. For Cypress families, using this procedure can help maintain privacy, speed asset transfer to beneficiaries, and reduce friction among heirs by resolving title problems through the trust framework established during estate planning.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services across California from our San Jose base, supporting clients in Cypress and Orange County. Our team handles trust drafting, funding guidance, Heggstad petitions, will preparation, durable powers of attorney, and advanced health directives. We prioritize clear communication, practical problem solving, and careful legal documentation to help reduce the likelihood of disputes. Our attorneys have years of courtroom and administrative experience representing trustees and beneficiaries in trust funding and probate matters, and we focus on helping families carry out the grantor’s intentions with minimal delay and disruption.
A Heggstad petition is a petition to the probate court that asks the judge to determine that a decedent intended particular property to be owned by the trust created during their lifetime, even though the title might still reflect the decedent’s individual name. The petition typically recites evidence such as trust documents, contemporaneous trust transfer instructions, declarations, and testimony from witnesses who observed the grantor’s intent or actions. The court evaluates whether, at the time of the transfer or death, it is more likely than not that the property was meant to be trust property, and if convinced, the judge may order the title corrected to reflect the trust’s ownership.
The petition procedure does not attempt to rewrite the trust or challenge its terms; rather, it confirms ownership of specific assets under an existing trust structure. Successful petitions generally involve careful chronological documentation such as bank records, correspondence, notarized transfer instructions, and statements from the person who handled the grantor’s finances. The goal is to present a persuasive narrative showing the grantor’s consistent intent to fund the trust. Courts in California consider the totality of evidence to determine whether the property should be treated as trust property and transferred to the trustee accordingly.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that a decedent intended certain assets to be part of a living trust and that title should be corrected to reflect that trust ownership. It is commonly used when deeds, account registrations, or other formalities were overlooked or misapplied before death. The petition references applicable trust documents and supporting materials to show intent, and asks the court to enter an order placing the property in the trust so the trustee can administer or distribute it. This remedy helps preserve the advantages of trust administration, including privacy and speedier distribution, without full probate administration.
Successful petitions require a coherent package of evidence and properly drafted pleadings. Important elements include a copy of the trust and any amendments, documentation showing the grantor’s ownership and attempts to transfer the asset, declarations from persons with firsthand knowledge of the grantor’s intent, and records demonstrating related actions such as transfers of funds or insurance changes. The petition must be served on interested parties and include a proposed order for the court. Preparing a clear evidentiary presentation and anticipating likely questions helps move the matter efficiently through the probate court.
Familiarity with key legal terms helps trustees, beneficiaries, and family members follow the petition process. Definitions include terms like trustee, grantor, trust funding, probate, and title correction. Understanding these basic concepts clarifies who has standing to petition, what type of evidence is persuasive, and how the court’s order will affect property ownership and administration. This glossary summarizes frequent terms encountered in trust funding disputes and provides plain-language explanations so clients can feel more confident when reviewing pleadings and supporting documentation in preparation for filing a petition.
Grantor refers to the person who created and funded the trust during their lifetime. The grantor establishes the trust’s terms, appoints trustees and beneficiaries, and may transfer assets into the trust for management and eventual distribution. When assets intended for the trust remain in the grantor’s individual name at the time of death, a Heggstad petition may be needed to confirm that the grantor intended those assets to belong to the trust. Evidence of the grantor’s actions and written instructions are often central to proving that intent to the court.
A trustee is the person or entity charged with managing trust assets for the benefit of the named beneficiaries according to the trust’s terms. The trustee has fiduciary duties to preserve trust property, invest prudently, and make distributions as directed. When property has not been properly retitled, the trustee may file a petition to have the court recognize that the asset belongs to the trust. The trustee’s role in a Heggstad petition often includes submitting declarations, providing documentation of trust administration, and explaining why the property should be placed under trust control.
Funding a trust is the process of transferring legal title of assets from the grantor to the trust so the trustee can manage them under the trust’s terms. Funding may involve changing deed titles, re-titling financial accounts, and assigning beneficiary designations consistently with the trust document. When funding steps are incomplete, the trust may not include intended property, creating the need for corrective actions like Heggstad petitions. Proper funding is essential to streamline administration and avoid unnecessary court proceedings after the grantor’s death.
Probate is the court-supervised process for validating wills, identifying assets, paying debts and distributing property when there is no effective living trust or when assets are not correctly titled in the trust’s name. A Heggstad petition can sometimes avoid a full probate administration by securing a targeted court order to place specific assets into a trust. Avoiding probate preserves privacy and can reduce time and expense, though in some situations limited probate steps may still be necessary depending on the nature and value of the assets involved.
When an asset intended for a trust remains improperly titled, there are several possible remedies depending on circumstances. A Heggstad petition offers a focused court declaration to place that asset into the trust based on evidence of the grantor’s intent. Alternatives can include full probate administration, informal claims and negotiated transfers among heirs, or corrective conveyances when parties agree. Each route has trade-offs in terms of time, cost, and privacy. Choosing the best approach requires evaluating the size and type of asset, the clarity of supporting documents, the level of agreement among beneficiaries, and the urgency of access to funds or property.
A limited petition or informal transfer is often appropriate when contemporaneous documents and witness statements unambiguously show the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust. Examples include signed transfer instructions, trust amendments referencing the asset, or banking records demonstrating intent to fund the trust. When documentation is strong and interested parties are cooperative, the trustee may be able to present evidence and obtain corrective title changes without extensive court involvement, resulting in a faster and less costly resolution that honors the grantor’s plan while minimizing conflict.
If heirs and potential claimants agree on the grantor’s intent and there are no competing claims, an informal corrective transfer or simplified petition may resolve the issue swiftly. Cooperation reduces the need for adversarial proceedings, and voluntary agreements can lead to direct re-titling of assets into the trust with minimal court oversight. When parties are aligned, time and expense are reduced, and the trustee can proceed with administration. However, even cooperative situations benefit from careful documentation and formal filings to prevent future disputes over ownership and distributions.
Comprehensive legal action is often necessary when there are conflicting beneficiary claims, ambiguous or missing documentation, or disputes about the grantor’s intent. In such cases, thorough investigation, preparation of sworn declarations, and a detailed evidentiary presentation to the court are critical to resolve ownership and prevent future litigation. The trustee may need to subpoena records, obtain formal testimony, and prepare for contested hearings. A careful, well-documented approach helps the probate court reach a clear conclusion that aligns with the estate plan and protects the trust’s administration from subsequent challenges.
Complex property types, such as real estate with title issues, retirement accounts, or assets located in multiple jurisdictions, often require a comprehensive legal plan. These situations may involve additional regulatory forms, tax implications, or coordination with outside institutions and counsel in other states. A broader legal approach ensures all necessary steps are taken to secure title, comply with applicable laws, and address any creditor or tax-related consequences. Proper handling of complex assets helps ensure the trust can fulfill distribution instructions as intended without unintended liabilities or delays.
A comprehensive approach to correcting trust funding errors reduces the risk of future disputes and ensures that all legal and administrative steps are completed correctly. By compiling complete records, preparing coherent petitions, and coordinating with financial institutions, trustees can secure clear title and reduce potential liabilities. This thoroughness preserves the integrity of the estate plan, protects beneficiaries’ interests, and reduces the chance of later contests. It also promotes transparency and trust among family members by providing documented reasons for actions taken and clear evidence supporting the trust’s ownership claims.
Taking a comprehensive route helps expedite access to assets for lawful administration and distribution while minimizing ancillary legal disputes. A well-prepared petition or corrective process addresses both legal title and ancillary issues such as beneficiary designations, tax documentation, and insurance matters. The careful resolution of these elements creates a smoother administration experience for trustees and beneficiaries, reduces administrative friction, and helps ensure that the decedent’s wishes are implemented in an orderly, defensible manner that withstands scrutiny from courts or potential challengers.
A thorough process reduces the likelihood of future litigation by establishing a strong factual record and obtaining a court order confirming trust ownership when appropriate. Clear, documented steps make it harder for later challengers to dispute title or intent and facilitate continuity in trust administration. This approach provides beneficiaries with confidence that assets will be distributed according to the trust terms, limits surprises during estate distribution, and supports smoother interactions with financial institutions and title companies tasked with completing transfers or sales of property in the trust’s name.
A comprehensive approach streamlines administration by resolving title and record issues proactively, allowing the trustee to focus on managing and distributing trust assets. Addressing potential problems up front reduces administrative delays, ensures fiduciary obligations are met, and protects beneficiaries from protracted disputes or financial uncertainty. Comprehensive documentation and clear court orders also make it easier for trustees to carry out their duties responsibly, provide necessary accounting, and comply with court or institutional requirements for transferring or selling trust property.
Start by collecting all documents that show the decedent’s intent to place assets in the trust, including trust agreements, signed transfer instructions, bank statements, emails, and canceled checks. Deeds, account change forms, and correspondence with financial institutions are particularly useful. Statements from individuals who assisted with finances or witnessed transfer discussions can supplement written records. A well-organized file of contemporaneous evidence strengthens a petition and can shorten the court process by presenting a coherent chain of intent and actions that support treating the asset as trust property.
Identify and preserve statements from individuals who can attest to the decedent’s intent, such as family members, caregivers, attorneys, or financial advisors. Witness declarations describing conversations, instructions, or observable actions help corroborate written evidence. Avoid delays that might result in lost memories or misplaced documents. Preserving records promptly and obtaining clear written statements where possible can be decisive in a Heggstad proceeding, providing the court with reliable testimony that the asset was meant to be part of the trust and supporting a favorable ruling to place the property under trustee control.
A Heggstad petition should be considered when assets intended for a trust were not retitled before death and those assets are significant to the administration of the estate. The petition helps avoid full probate administration for specific assets, supports the trustee’s authority to manage and distribute trust property, and protects beneficiary expectations under the trust. Families facing title errors, immediate need to access funds, or potential disputes among heirs often find this remedy aligns with their goal of efficiently carrying out the decedent’s estate plan while preserving privacy and reducing overall administration costs.
Filing a Heggstad petition can also be helpful when financial institutions require a court order to release funds to a trustee or when there is uncertainty about whether title transfers were completed. The petition clarifies ownership and simplifies subsequent transactions such as selling real property or transferring account ownership. Even where parties initially agree, a formal court order adds a layer of protection and finality, reducing the risk of future contests. For trustees and beneficiaries in Cypress, this process often restores intended distributions while minimizing further legal complications.
Typical circumstances include real property still in the decedent’s name, bank or brokerage accounts not retitled to the trust, transfers initiated but incomplete at death, and clerical errors when documents were prepared. Other situations involve retirement accounts with conflicting beneficiary designations or life insurance policies that were not coordinated with the trust. When such gaps arise, trustees may need court assistance to place the assets into the trust so distributions can proceed according to the trust terms, avoiding unnecessary delay or contested probate matters.
Real estate that was intended to be owned by the trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name is one of the most common triggers for a Heggstad petition. Deeds may not have been executed or recorded, or the grantor may have planned to retitle the property but passed before completing the transaction. A petition can ask the court to confirm the grantor’s intent and order correction of title so the trustee can sell, manage, or distribute the property as the trust directs, reducing the need for full probate and enabling timely administration.
Bank, brokerage, or investment accounts that remain registered to the decedent rather than the trust can create access issues for the trustee and may require a Heggstad petition. Institutions frequently decline to transfer funds without a court order or clear documentation. Filing a petition provides the necessary judicial backing to compel institutions to re-title or release funds to the trustee. This is especially important when immediate access to funds is needed to pay debts, taxes, or ongoing expenses tied to estate administration.
Clerical mistakes, incomplete transfer instructions, or miscommunication during document preparation can leave assets out of a trust despite the grantor’s intent. Such errors are often discoverable only during estate administration, triggering the need for corrective legal action. A Heggstad petition addresses these issues by presenting evidence that the grantor intended the transfer, allowing the court to fix the title and place the property under trust control. Correcting these errors helps ensure the estate plan functions as the grantor intended and beneficiaries receive their intended inheritances.
We assist Cypress residents with completing the necessary legal steps when trust funding errors occur. Our services include evaluating documents, advising trustees on evidence collection, preparing and filing petitions, and representing trustees in court hearings when required. We strive to provide clear guidance throughout the process, explain choices and likely outcomes, and pursue timely resolutions that align with the decedent’s trust terms. Our goal is to reduce administrative delay, secure title to trust assets, and help trustees carry out their duties with confidence and minimal disruption to beneficiaries.
Choosing a firm familiar with trust administration and probate procedures helps ensure petitions are filed correctly and supported with persuasive evidence. We bring practical courtroom experience and a methodical approach to compiling contemporaneous documents, drafting clear pleadings, and presenting factual narratives that reflect the grantor’s intent. Our practice emphasizes attentive client communication, careful preparation, and strategic planning to achieve title corrections that allow trustees to manage trust assets and fulfill distribution duties under the trust’s terms with as little delay as the circumstances permit.
We provide personalized attention to each case, helping trustees understand the legal standards and likely timelines for petition resolution. From collecting bank records and transfer documents to securing witness declarations and preparing courtroom filings, we aim to make the process as straightforward as possible. Our familiarity with Orange County probate courts enables efficient navigation of local procedures, reducing avoidable setbacks. Clients receive pragmatic advice about whether a Heggstad petition or alternative remedy best suits their situation, together with a clear plan for moving forward.
Our goal is to preserve the decedent’s intentions while minimizing administrative costs and emotional strain on families. We work closely with trustees to assemble convincing documentation and propose solutions that expedite retitling or court approval. By focusing on clear evidence, respectful communication with other parties, and careful legal drafting, we seek to resolve title issues so the trust can be administered and distributed as intended. For clients in Cypress and surrounding areas, we provide responsive counsel and practical support throughout the funding correction process.
Our process begins with a detailed document review to assess whether a Heggstad petition is the best course. We identify and collect relevant evidence, prepare declarations and supporting exhibits, and draft the petition and proposed order for court consideration. We serve interested parties and handle responses or objections if they arise, seeking to resolve disputes through negotiation if possible. If a hearing is required, we present the evidence clearly and respectfully to the court. Throughout, we keep trustees informed about timelines, anticipated costs, and next steps to facilitate efficient trust administration.
The initial stage focuses on determining whether the facts support a Heggstad petition and identifying the documentation needed. We review trust instruments, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any signed funding instructions. We also interview witnesses who can attest to the grantor’s intent, and request records from institutions holding the assets. This comprehensive evidence-gathering phase helps build a persuasive presentation for the court and can reveal whether alternative, quicker resolutions may be viable based on institutional policies or agreement among heirs.
We examine the trust instrument, any amendments, and property records to determine whether the trust terms clearly reference the asset and how title currently appears. This review identifies discrepancies between intended trust property and recorded ownership and informs the strategy for correcting title. Obtaining certified copies of trust documents and recorded deeds is important, as is checking for beneficiary designations or liens that could affect the retitling process. A careful document review clarifies the legal grounds for the petition and highlights any issues to address before filing.
Collecting bank statements, account applications, emails, and other communications that demonstrate transfer attempts or intent is crucial. Records showing transfers, payments, or instructions to change account ownership help corroborate the claim that the asset was meant for the trust. Gathering this documentary support early allows us to prepare detailed declarations and exhibits for the petition and ensures that the narrative presented to the court is consistent, persuasive, and supported by contemporaneous evidence rather than memory alone.
With evidence assembled, we draft the formal petition and supporting declarations, prepare a proposed order for the court, and arrange service on interested parties. The petition explains the factual and legal basis for treating the asset as trust property and attaches exhibits such as the trust document, deeds, and witness declarations. We also prepare notices and proof of service forms to comply with local probate rules. Filing the petition initiates the court’s review and starts the timeline for resolution, whether by agreement or after a hearing if needed.
Declarations from trustees, witnesses, or professionals form the backbone of the petition’s factual showing. Each declaration is drafted to provide clear, chronological statements about the grantor’s actions and intent, supported by documentary exhibits. Exhibits are organized and labeled for easy reference, and the petition’s legal arguments are tailored to applicable California probate law. Well-crafted declarations and exhibits make it easier for the court to follow the evidence and issue an order confirming trust ownership when the factual record supports that outcome.
After filing, we serve interested parties and monitor for any objections or petitions that could complicate matters. If objections arise, we evaluate their merits and pursue negotiated resolutions when appropriate, while preparing to present the factual record at a hearing if necessary. Addressing objections proactively, with supplemental declarations or additional evidence as needed, increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and helps limit extended litigation. Our objective is to obtain a clear court order that places the asset in the trust so the trustee can proceed with administration.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, we present the evidence and argue that the requested order is consistent with the grantor’s intent and trust terms. Upon a favorable ruling, the court issues an order directing the title correction or other relief requested in the petition. The trustee can use that order to obtain cooperation from financial institutions or title companies to re-title the asset into the trust. Finalizing the court order and completing necessary recordings or account changes concludes the corrective process and enables trust administration to continue as planned.
At hearing, we focus on clear, organized presentation of the documentary record and witness declarations that demonstrate the grantor’s intent. The goal is to persuade the judge that placing the asset in the trust aligns with the trust document and the grantor’s actions. We anticipate likely questions from the court and prepare witnesses to provide straightforward, factual testimony. A calm, evidence-driven presentation helps the court reach a reasoned decision and issue an order directing the necessary title correction so the trustee can proceed with administration.
Following a favorable order, we assist trustees with implementing the court’s directives, including recording corrected deeds, submitting court orders to financial institutions, and completing any necessary account transfer forms. We coordinate with title companies and banks to ensure all administrative steps required to reflect trust ownership are completed properly. This final phase confirms the asset is under the trustee’s control, allowing distributions, sales, or management consistent with the trust’s terms and preventing later disputes over the asset’s status.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used when property intended for a trust remains titled in the decedent’s individual name at the time of death. The petition asks the probate court to declare that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and to order correction of title so the trustee can manage and distribute the property under the trust’s terms. It is commonly used for real estate, bank or brokerage accounts, and other assets where the formal retitling process was not completed. When the documentation and witness statements show the grantor’s clear intent, a Heggstad petition can provide a streamlined remedy that avoids full probate for the specific asset. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence, including trust documents, transfer attempts, and contemporaneous communications, before deciding whether to order the title correction requested by the trustee.
Timing depends on the complexity of the case, the volume of evidence, and whether interested parties object. If the facts are straightforward and parties cooperate, a petition can sometimes be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. Courts in Orange County vary in scheduling, and processing time includes notice periods, filing, and any required hearings. When disputes arise or additional evidence is needed, the process can take longer. Preparing a thorough petition with organized exhibits and witness declarations helps shorten review time. Early coordination with institutions that hold the assets and prompt service on interested parties can also reduce delays in reaching a court decision.
Persuasive evidence generally includes the trust instrument and any amendments, contemporaneous transfer instructions, bank or title records showing attempted transfers, and communications reflecting the grantor’s intent. Deeds, account change forms, and canceled checks showing payment or transfer of funds are particularly valuable. Declarations from individuals who handled the grantor’s affairs or who witnessed transfer-related conversations can also be powerful when they are consistent with the documentary record. Organizing evidence in chronological order with clear exhibits attached to declarations improves its impact. Courts look for reliable, contemporaneous documentation rather than vague recollections, so assembling records early and presenting them in an accessible format strengthens the petition and increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Beneficiaries or other interested parties can object to a petition, claiming different ownership or arguing the evidence does not support the grantor’s intent. When objections are filed, the matter may require additional briefing, supplemental declarations, or a contested hearing where each side presents its evidence. The court then weighs the competing claims and decides if the asset should be placed in the trust based on the preponderance of evidence. If disputes arise, pursuing negotiation or mediation can sometimes resolve objections without a protracted hearing. When resolution is not possible, a careful factual presentation at hearing is necessary, and the court will issue an order after evaluating all evidence and testimony presented by the parties.
A Heggstad petition can avoid full probate for the specific asset at issue by securing a court order that places the property into the trust. However, it does not automatically eliminate the need for probate for other assets that are not trust property or where probate is otherwise required. The petition is a focused remedy aimed at correcting title to particular items rather than serving as a substitute for broader estate administration when multiple non-trust assets exist. Whether probate is avoided depends on the overall estate situation. When the bulk of significant assets are properly funded to the trust and only a few items require correction, filing targeted petitions can often limit court involvement to those discrete issues and allow the trust administration to proceed without a larger probate process.
Costs vary depending on document preparation, evidence collection, and whether the petition is contested. Expenses include filing fees, costs for obtaining certified records or recordings, and attorney fees to draft the petition and declarations. When a hearing becomes necessary or parties contest the petition, additional time and expense can increase the overall cost. Institutions may also require fees to process transfers once a court order is obtained. Early organization and cooperation among interested parties can reduce costs by limiting the need for court hearings. Providing clear documentary evidence and preparing persuasive declarations at the outset helps streamline the process, lowering the time and expense necessary to secure an order placing the asset in the trust.
If the court denies the petition, the asset will remain in its current legal status and may require other legal pathways to resolve ownership, such as probate administration or negotiated settlements with heirs. A denial may follow a finding that the evidence was insufficient to show the grantor intended the asset to be part of the trust. When denied, parties can reassess available options and consider gathering further evidence or pursuing alternative remedies appropriate to the circumstances. A denial is often an encouragement to re-evaluate the supporting documentation and witness testimony that was presented. In some situations, additional records or clarification from institutions may allow a renewed effort, while in others the parties may proceed with probate or other resolution strategies to accomplish the estate’s objectives.
Access to funds before petition resolution depends on institutional policies and whether emergency relief is justified. Banks and other institutions typically require a court order or agreement among interested parties before releasing funds to a trustee. In urgent situations, interim court relief or temporary orders may be sought to allow access to funds needed to pay debts, taxes, or immediate expenses, but the court evaluates such requests carefully and requires convincing justification. Trustees should avoid informal withdrawal of assets without clear legal authority, as doing so can create liability and disputes. Seeking prompt legal advice and pursuing appropriate interim relief through the court or negotiated agreements ensures that trustees act within legal boundaries while addressing pressing financial needs of the estate.
Alternatives include negotiated transfers among heirs and beneficiaries, where all interested parties agree to re-title the asset into the trust without court involvement. In cooperative situations with clear documentation, institutions may accept written agreements and proper forms to complete transfers. Another route is formal probate administration where the court supervises distribution of non-trust assets, although this is typically more time-consuming and public compared to trust administration. The right alternative depends on the level of dispute, the type of asset, and institutional requirements. When parties are willing to cooperate and documentation supports the grantor’s intent, informal resolution can be quicker and less expensive. When disagreement exists, a Heggstad petition provides a judicial mechanism to resolve title issues while preserving the trust’s role.
To avoid the need for a Heggstad petition later, grantors should periodically review their estate plan and ensure assets are properly retitled to the trust. Maintaining clear records of funding transactions, updating deeds and account registrations, and coordinating beneficiary designations with trust terms reduces the likelihood of assets unintentionally remaining outside the trust. Working with counsel to confirm that real estate, financial accounts, and other property are properly titled helps prevent posthumous title corrections. Keeping an organized record of instructions, transfer documents, and communications with financial institutions helps trustees later demonstrate intent if questions arise. Regularly reviewing these steps and updating documentation after major life changes such as relocation, marriage, or asset purchases helps preserve the integrity of the estate plan and reduces the chance of needing corrective petitions after death.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas