A trust modification petition can help Foothill Ranch residents update an existing trust to reflect changed circumstances, shifting family dynamics, or revised financial goals. Our firm provides clear guidance on when a petition is appropriate, how the process typically unfolds in Orange County probate courts, and what documentation is usually required. We emphasize careful planning, clear communication, and compliance with California law to protect your assets and the interests of those you care about. This introduction outlines the purpose of a trust modification petition and sets expectations for timelines, potential court involvement, and steps you can take to prepare.
Whether you are addressing ambiguous language, correcting drafting errors, or seeking to adjust distribution terms, a trust modification petition can be an effective remedy when informal solutions are unavailable. Many clients come to us after discovering that a trust no longer reflects their intentions due to changes in family structure, tax law, or asset mix. This paragraph explains how a petition differs from informal amendment procedures and why some situations require court approval, including disputes among beneficiaries, unclear trustee authority, or the need to alter trust terms that affect third party rights.
A properly pursued trust modification petition can preserve the original purpose of a trust while adapting it to new realities. Benefits include clarifying ambiguous provisions, resolving inconsistencies, and enabling changes that cannot be handled through trustee actions or simple amendments. This process helps minimize later conflicts among beneficiaries and can prevent costly litigation by remedying defects early. For trustees, it can provide court authorization for actions that might otherwise be questioned. Overall, pursuing a petition when appropriate helps maintain the integrity of an estate plan and ensures that the grantor’s intent remains meaningful and enforceable.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Foothill Ranch and throughout California with a focus on estate planning and trust matters. Our team approaches trust modification petitions with careful analysis of trust documents, relevant case law, and procedural requirements. We prioritize clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries to identify goals and potential challenges. By preparing thorough petitions, supporting declarations, and documentation, the firm aims to present the strongest possible case to the probate court while managing timelines and client expectations for a predictable process and respectful handling of sensitive family matters.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate court to alter the terms or administration of an existing trust when informal methods are insufficient or contested. In California, petitions may be necessary to correct drafting errors, adjust trustee powers, remove or add beneficiaries, or address changed circumstances that affect the trust’s operation. The process typically involves filing a petition, providing notice to interested parties, and, in many cases, submitting declarations and evidence supporting the requested modification. Understanding the reasons courts grant modifications and the available remedies is essential before beginning the process.
Before filing a petition, it is often helpful to attempt good faith discussions among parties and consider mediation to avoid court involvement. When those paths fail or are impractical, a petition allows the court to weigh the grantor’s intent, the trust language, and equitable principles to determine whether modification is appropriate. Courts consider factors such as ambiguity, impossibility of performance, changed circumstances, and whether a modification aligns with the grantor’s likely intent. Knowing these considerations helps clients set realistic goals and gather the evidence needed for a persuasive filing.
A trust modification petition formally asks the probate court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust. The petition should explain why modification is necessary, identify the provisions at issue, and propose precise changes. It will list interested parties, provide legal authority, and attach supporting documents like the trust instrument and relevant correspondences. The court reviews the petition, considers any objections, and evaluates whether the modification aligns with state law and the grantor’s probable intent. The outcome can range from approval of the requested changes to denial or referral to further hearings for contested issues.
Successful petitions include clear identification of the trust document, explanation of the legal basis for modification, and evidence supporting the need for change. Key procedural steps include drafting the petition, providing statutory notice to beneficiaries and trustees, filing with the appropriate probate court, and responding to any objections or requests for additional information. Supporting declarations or exhibits may include the trust, correspondence that demonstrates intent or ambiguity, and affidavits from persons with pertinent knowledge. Attention to procedural timelines and proper service is essential for the petition to proceed without technical issues.
Understanding common terms related to trust modification petitions will help you follow the process and communicate effectively with counsel. Terms such as grantor, trustee, beneficiary, trust instrument, petition, notice of hearing, and decree are frequently used in filings and hearings. Familiarity with these terms reduces confusion during the legal process and clarifies each party’s role. This section highlights the most relevant vocabulary you are likely to encounter while pursuing or responding to a trust modification petition so you can approach the matter with confidence and clear expectations.
The grantor is the person who originally created the trust and set its terms. The grantor’s stated intentions within the trust document guide the court’s analysis when considering a modification petition. In many proceedings, demonstrating the grantor’s intent, whether through the trust language or supporting evidence, is central to the court’s decision. Understanding who the grantor is and what they intended helps beneficiaries and trustees assess the strength of grounds for modification and craft appropriate arguments to support a proposed change.
A trustee is the individual or entity charged with administering the trust according to its terms and in the beneficiaries’ best interests. Trustees have fiduciary duties, including loyalty, prudence, and impartiality, and may be named or appointed through the court if removal or replacement is requested. When a trust modification petition affects trustee powers or duties, the court may evaluate the trustee’s current actions, decision-making, and adherence to the trust terms. Clarity on trustee authority and responsibilities helps the court determine appropriate modifications and safeguards.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiary interests and objections play a central role in modification petitions because courts must consider the impact of changes on those who stand to gain or lose. Notices are required to inform beneficiaries of a proposed petition so they may respond or participate. A well-prepared petition will address the interests of each beneficiary and explain how the proposed change aligns with the grantor’s intent while minimizing undue harm to current rights.
A petition is the formal court filing that requests modification, interpretation, or other relief related to a trust. It outlines the legal and factual basis for the requested action, identifies interested parties, and proposes specific changes. The petition must comply with local probate court rules and include necessary attachments like the trust instrument and supporting affidavits. The petition serves as the starting point for judicial review and frames the issues the court will decide, making thorough preparation and accurate presentation essential to achieving a favorable resolution.
When a trust needs revision, parties can explore informal amendment options or file a petition with the court. Informal methods, such as trustee action where permitted or a signed amendment by the grantor, can be quicker and less costly but are only available when all relevant parties agree and the trust terms allow it. A court petition is appropriate for disputes, unclear authority, or when the proposed change affects third party rights. This comparison describes factors like cost, timing, evidentiary needs, and the likelihood of resolving disputes without litigation so clients can choose the best pathway.
For minor drafting errors or simple clarifications that do not affect beneficiary rights or substantive trust terms, less formal approaches can be effective. Examples include correcting typographical mistakes, clarifying ambiguous language with supporting affidavits, or executing a restatement when allowed by the trust. These solutions often require agreement among interested parties and careful documentation to prevent future disputes. Pursuing a limited approach can save time and expense while still ensuring the trust accurately reflects the grantor’s intended meaning and operational needs.
When the grantor is available and the trust permits it, the grantor may execute an amendment or restatement to achieve the desired changes without court involvement. This path is often suitable when beneficiaries consent or when the changes do not interfere with existing third party rights. Proper execution formalities, including signatures and witnessing requirements, should be followed to ensure validity. An agreed, well-documented amendment can preserve relationships among parties and address the issue quickly without the complexity of court proceedings.
When beneficiaries disagree or a trustee’s authority is disputed, a comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary to protect rights and present a persuasive case to the court. Contested situations require detailed factual development, careful drafting of legal arguments, and strategic handling of notices and hearings. A thorough approach includes preparing declarations from witnesses, collecting relevant documents, and anticipating opposing arguments so the petition addresses concerns preemptively. This level of preparation helps the court resolve disputes fairly and minimizes the risk of future litigation over the same issues.
Complex trusts involving multiple subtrusts, tax-sensitive provisions, or creditor issues may require court action to ensure changes are legally sound and do not expose assets to unintended consequences. A comprehensive approach analyzes the interplay of trust provisions, tax implications, and creditor rights to design a modification that protects beneficiaries. This often involves consultation, document review, and coordination with financial advisors. Courts will look closely at the proposed changes when complexity is present, so detailed legal work is essential for a successful outcome.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification provides a structured path to resolve disputes, clarify intentions, and protect the interests of beneficiaries and trustees. By thoroughly documenting the reasons for change, preparing evidence, and complying with procedural rules, parties increase their chances of obtaining clear court approval that withstands future challenges. This reduces uncertainty, helps prevent later litigation, and can result in a durable solution that aligns trust administration with the grantor’s objectives while addressing practical concerns like taxation and creditor exposure.
Beyond legal protection, a comprehensive process helps maintain family relationships by creating an opportunity for transparent discussion and documented resolutions. Even in contentious matters, structured proceedings can channel disagreements into a legal framework for resolution and provide neutral evaluation by the court. The certainty of a judicial decree can give trustees confidence to act and beneficiaries reassurance about the stability of distributions and administration. Overall, the benefits include legal clarity, reduced long-term costs, and a clearer path for carrying out the grantor’s intent.
When the court approves a modification, the resulting order provides clear, enforceable guidance for trustees and beneficiaries, reducing ambiguity about rights and duties. This clarity helps trustees act confidently in administering the trust and reduces the risk of future disputes over interpretation. An enforceable court order clarifies how distributions should occur, what powers the trustee holds, and how contested provisions should be implemented. The durability of a judicial resolution enhances long-term planning and ensures the trust functions as intended under judicial supervision when necessary.
A well-documented, court-approved modification diminishes the likelihood of subsequent litigation by addressing ambiguities and disputed terms definitively. By resolving contested issues through the legal process, parties obtain a record of the court’s reasoning and an authoritative resolution that binds the parties. This reduces uncertainty and the incentive for relitigation. Having a formal decree in place makes it easier for trustees to follow instructions and for beneficiaries to understand their entitlements, which can lead to fewer challenges and more predictable administration over time.
Begin by collecting the original trust, any amendments or restatements, supporting correspondence, and related financial documents. Organizing these materials early helps identify ambiguous provisions, track changes over time, and build a clear narrative for the court. Include records showing the grantor’s intent, such as letters or estate planning notes, and any communications with trustees or beneficiaries about the disputed language. A complete and organized file reduces delays, supports the petition’s factual basis, and makes it easier to respond to court inquiries and opposition claims.
Declarations and exhibits are central to demonstrating why the proposed modification is necessary and appropriate. Prepare concise, factual declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the circumstances, and attach documentary evidence that corroborates those statements. Avoid speculative or argumentative language; focus on demonstrable facts such as dates, communications, and examples of ambiguity or changed circumstances. Well-prepared evidentiary support strengthens the petition, helps the court understand the issues, and can reduce the need for lengthy contested proceedings.
Individuals often seek trust modification petitions when a trust no longer aligns with family dynamics, contains drafting errors, or cannot be administered as intended due to changed circumstances. Other reasons include adding or removing beneficiaries, adjusting trustee powers, correcting scrivener errors, or addressing tax and creditor concerns that were unforeseen at the time the trust was created. Seeking formal relief through the court provides a definitive path to resolve these issues when informal remedies are unavailable or when parties cannot reach agreement.
Some situations require judicial involvement because they affect third party rights or involve contested interpretations that could lead to future contests if left unresolved. Filing a petition can provide clarity and a public record of the court’s determination, which can be valuable to trustees and beneficiaries seeking certainty about administration and distributions. Petition-driven modifications can prevent misunderstandings, align administration with current law and circumstances, and provide a measured process for addressing complex or disputed trust matters.
Common circumstances that lead to petitions include ambiguous or conflicting provisions within the trust, an unavailable or incapacitated grantor, disputes over trustee authority, and changes in family structure such as divorce or the addition of new heirs. Other triggers include discovered drafting errors, changes in tax law that affect trust administration, or creditor claims that require restructuring. Recognizing these triggers early can help parties evaluate whether a petition or another remedy is the most practical way to address the issue and preserve the grantor’s intent.
Ambiguities or inconsistencies in trust language are a frequent reason to pursue a court petition because unclear provisions can paralyze administration and invite disputes. When trustees and beneficiaries interpret the same clause differently, the court may be asked to determine the grantor’s intended meaning and issue an authoritative interpretation or modification. Addressing ambiguity early through a petition can prevent repeated disagreements and provide guidance for ongoing administration, ensuring that distributions and trustee actions align with the clarified intent.
Significant life changes, such as divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths, can render existing trust provisions unsuitable or unfair. When a trust does not reflect the current family reality, a petition can help realign terms to match the grantor’s intentions or to address unintended outcomes. Courts can consider the circumstances and, when appropriate, approve modifications that account for new relationships or changed needs, while ensuring that proper notice and procedural safeguards are observed to protect all parties involved.
When trustees and beneficiaries disagree about proper administration or when a trustee lacks clear authority to act, a petition can resolve deadlocks and authorize necessary steps. Courts may grant relief to empower trustees to manage assets, make distributions, or take protective measures when ambiguity or conflict hinders effective administration. Seeking judicial guidance in these scenarios protects fiduciary duties and helps avoid actions that could later be challenged, while enabling the trust to operate smoothly under clarified authority and oversight.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides assistance to Foothill Ranch residents facing trust modification matters, offering practical guidance on documenting issues, preparing petitions, and navigating Orange County probate procedures. We work to clarify your goals, identify the most appropriate remedies, and pursue resolutions that protect interests while minimizing expense and delay. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with all parties, careful preparation of filings, and courtroom readiness if hearings are necessary. Our goal is to help you achieve a durable, court-approved solution that addresses the problem at hand.
Clients choose our firm for our focus on estate planning and trust matters, commitment to clear communication, and practical approach to problem solving. We prioritize listening to your goals, reviewing documents thoroughly, and presenting well-supported petitions that address legal and factual issues. Our process emphasizes careful preparation to reduce procedural pitfalls, provide persuasive documentation, and work toward resolutions that align with the grantor’s intent. We also coordinate with financial advisors and other professionals when needed to ensure comprehensive consideration of related issues like tax or creditor exposure.
From initial analysis to court filings and hearings, we provide step-by-step guidance so clients understand what to expect at each stage. We assist in collecting supporting documents, drafting legally sound petitions, and communicating with interested parties in a manner that seeks resolution while protecting client interests. Our approach balances advocacy with a desire to preserve family relationships where possible by encouraging constructive dialogue and exploring settlement options before litigating, while remaining prepared to present a strong case when court involvement is required.
We also offer practical guidance on alternatives to petitioning the court, including negotiation and mediation when appropriate, and can counsel trustees and beneficiaries on interim administration to avoid missteps during a pending matter. Our goal is to secure a resolution that is durable and enforceable, reducing the likelihood of future conflicts and providing clarity for ongoing trust administration. We handle the procedural requirements and courtroom protocols so clients can focus on protecting their family’s interests and the integrity of the estate plan.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust document, related amendments, and supporting records to identify the core issues and determine whether a petition is warranted. We then outline possible solutions, explain procedural requirements and likely timelines, and help you gather evidence. If filing is appropriate, we draft a petition tailored to the court’s rules, provide notice to interested parties, and coordinate filings. We prepare declarations and exhibits, respond to objections, and present the matter at hearing, aiming for a resolution that provides clear, enforceable guidance.
The first step involves a comprehensive review of the trust instrument, amendments, and any communications or documents that shed light on the grantor’s intent and the reasons for modification. We assess whether informal amendment is an option or whether a petition is required. This stage includes identifying interested parties, potential objections, and the type of relief to request. Establishing a strategy early allows us to plan the necessary evidence, timeline, and desired outcomes while advising clients on likely costs and procedural steps.
Collecting contemporaneous documents, witness statements, and communications that support the need for modification is essential. These materials may include letters from the grantor, prior drafts of the trust, accountant or advisor notes, and emails that clarify intent. Well-documented evidence strengthens the petition and helps the court understand the context of the requested changes. We assist clients in identifying and organizing relevant materials and in preparing clear, persuasive declarations that present the factual basis for modification.
Understanding and complying with procedural requirements, including who must receive notice, statutory timelines, and local court rules, is critical to avoiding delays. We evaluate which parties must be served and ensure that notice documents are properly prepared and delivered. Early attention to procedural details reduces the risk of technical challenges that could derail the petition. This preparation also provides an opportunity to discuss potential settlement or alternative dispute resolution avenues prior to filing, which can save time and expense when parties are willing to cooperate.
In this stage we prepare a focused petition that identifies the precise relief sought, the legal basis for modification, and the supporting facts. The petition includes the trust instrument as an exhibit, detailed factual declarations, and any other documentary evidence necessary to support the claims. We file with the appropriate Orange County probate department and serve the notice to interested parties, ensuring all procedural requirements are met. Clear drafting and thoughtful presentation of the issues increase the likelihood of efficient court review and favorable resolution.
A persuasive petition frames the relief in precise language and links factual evidence to applicable legal standards. We craft arguments that explain why the requested modification is consistent with the grantor’s intent and statutory authority. The filing includes requested orders, proposed forms of decree, and any interim relief needed to protect trust assets. Careful drafting helps the court grasp the issues quickly and enables the judge to issue targeted relief, whether that involves interpretation, modification, or authorization of specific trustee actions.
Once the petition is filed and served, interested parties may file written responses or appear at hearings to object. We monitor filings, prepare responses to opposition, and seek to resolve disputes where possible through negotiation or court-managed alternatives. If objections proceed to hearing, we present declarations and arguments to counter opposing positions and support the requested relief. Active case management and timely responses are essential to moving the matter forward and minimizing delays caused by procedural disputes or discovery requests.
After briefing and any necessary discovery, the court typically schedules a hearing where parties may present argument and evidence. The judge will consider the petition, any objections, and supporting declarations before issuing an order or decree. If the petition is granted, we assist with implementing the court’s order, updating trust records, and advising trustees on the decree’s scope. If additional corrective steps are required, such as clarification hearings or follow-up filings, we manage those proceedings to ensure the trust administration proceeds in accordance with the court’s determination.
Preparing for hearing involves organizing evidence, preparing declarants for testimony if needed, and presenting concise legal argument tailored to the judge’s preferences. Clear exhibit lists, admissible supporting materials, and focused declarations help the court assess the merits efficiently. We prepare clients for what to expect during hearings and ensure that presentation emphasizes facts rather than speculation. Thoughtful courtroom preparation increases the likelihood of achieving durable relief and minimizes surprises during judicial consideration.
Once a court grants relief, it is important to implement the order correctly by updating trust records, notifying stakeholders, and taking any authorized actions such as transferring assets or adjusting trustee authority. We assist with drafting conforming documents, preparing certified copies of orders for financial institutions, and advising trustees on ongoing administration under the new terms. Proper implementation helps ensure compliance with the decree and reduces the risk of future disagreement or litigation over how the trust should operate post-modification.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court to change or clarify the terms or administration of an existing trust when less formal methods are unavailable or inappropriate. Common grounds for filing include ambiguity in trust language, drafting errors, changes in family circumstances, or disputes about trustee authority. The petition explains the requested relief, provides supporting evidence, and lists interested parties who must be notified, enabling the court to evaluate whether the proposed change aligns with the grantor’s likely intent and applicable legal standards. Filing a petition provides authoritative court guidance when informal solutions are insufficient. This process helps ensure clarity for trustees and beneficiaries and can prevent ongoing disputes. By documenting facts and presenting them in a structured legal format, the petition allows the court to issue an enforceable order that governs future administration and reduces uncertainty about rights and duties.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on the complexity of the issues, the court’s schedule, and whether the petition is contested. Simple matters with cooperative parties and clear evidence may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, while contested petitions involving discovery, multiple hearings, or complex factual disputes can take significantly longer. Court processing times and local probate calendars in Orange County also influence timing. Planning for potential delays and maintaining clear communication with all parties helps manage expectations. Early organization of documents and focused legal arguments can shorten the timeline by reducing the need for additional fact-finding. When objections arise, additional hearings and briefing can extend the process, so anticipating likely areas of dispute and addressing them in the petition can mitigate delay and help the court reach a resolution efficiently.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties must be notified of a trust modification petition under California probate rules. Proper notice ensures that affected parties have an opportunity to review the petition and object if they believe the requested change is inappropriate. The notice requirements specify which parties must receive information and the manner of service. Providing accurate notice is essential to preserve the court’s jurisdiction and to prevent future challenges based on defective service. Fulfilling notice obligations also supports a transparent process and can sometimes lead to negotiated resolutions before a contested hearing becomes necessary. Careful attention to notice details, including identifying all potentially affected beneficiaries and their contact information, reduces procedural risks and fosters a process in which concerns can be addressed early to avoid later disputes.
Yes, a trust can often be modified after the grantor has died, though the grounds and procedures differ from post-creation amendments by the grantor. After death, courts may approve modifications to correct mistakes, resolve ambiguities, or adapt terms that cannot be carried out as written. Petitioners must demonstrate why the court’s intervention is necessary and how the proposed change aligns with the grantor’s intent or equitable considerations. The probate court evaluates evidence such as the trust document itself, communications, and other corroborating materials in determining whether to grant relief. Post-mortem modifications usually require careful documentation and may be more contested because beneficiaries’ rights are directly affected, so a thorough presentation to the court is important to secure lasting resolutions and clear guidance for trustees.
Evidence supporting a modification petition often includes the trust instrument, prior drafts or amendments, contemporaneous communications from the grantor, and declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the circumstances. Documentary evidence such as letters, emails, or meeting notes that reflect the grantor’s intent can be persuasive. Financial records, tax documents, and professional adviser’s notes may also be relevant when demonstrating changed circumstances or unintended consequences. The court looks for concrete facts that show why modification is necessary and how it serves the trust’s overall purpose. Presenting organized, credible evidence reduces reliance on speculation and helps the court assess the appropriate remedy. Clear, factual declarations and corroborating documents increase the chance of a favorable outcome by establishing a reliable factual basis for the requested modification.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiation among interested parties, mediation, or executing a valid amendment or restatement when the trust instrument and parties allow. Negotiation and mediation can preserve relationships and reach solutions more quickly and inexpensively than court proceedings, particularly when beneficiaries and trustees are willing to cooperate. When the grantor is available and the trust permits, executing a formal amendment or restatement may resolve issues without court involvement. However, when parties cannot agree or when changes affect third party rights, a petition may be the only viable path to secure authoritative relief. Evaluating alternatives early helps determine whether court action can be avoided or should be pursued promptly to protect interests and achieve long-term clarity.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary with complexity, court fees, the need for discovery, and whether the matter is contested. Simple petitions with cooperative parties typically incur lower attorney fees and fewer court costs, while contested matters requiring extensive evidence, hearings, or appeals may be substantially more expensive. Factors influencing cost include document drafting, preparation of declarations, expert involvement where necessary, and time spent responding to objections. Courts also charge filing and service fees that add to total costs. Discussing cost estimates and potential fee structures early in the process helps clients plan financially and weigh alternatives. In many cases, targeted preparation and efforts to reach agreement can reduce overall expense by shortening proceedings and lessening the scope of contested litigation.
Yes, trustees may file petitions when they need court authorization to take actions not clearly permitted by the trust or to resolve disputes that obstruct administration. A trustee petition can request clarification of duties, authorization to sell or invest assets, or confirmation of distribution methods. Courts evaluate trustee petitions to ensure proposed actions align with fiduciary duties and the grantor’s intentions. When trustees seek judicial guidance, obtaining a court order protects them from future claims of misconduct by providing approved directions on administration. Trustees should carefully document the reasons for court involvement and present evidence that demonstrates why judicial authorization is necessary to fulfill their duties and protect beneficiaries’ interests.
If beneficiaries object to the proposed modification, the court will consider their arguments along with supporting evidence before deciding whether to grant relief. Objections often focus on claims that the modification would contradict the grantor’s intent or unfairly prejudice certain beneficiaries. The court may hold hearings to resolve factual disputes, review declarations, and weigh competing positions. Successful resolution depends on demonstrating that the modification is consistent with legal standards and the trust’s purpose. Where objections raise legitimate concerns, the court may limit or deny relief or seek alternative remedies that balance competing interests. Engaging in early dialogue and providing clear, persuasive evidence helps address objections and can increase the likelihood of a resolution acceptable to multiple parties.
A court order modifying a trust can affect tax consequences and creditor rights, depending on the nature of the changes. Some modifications might alter the classification of trust assets or affect timing of distributions, which in turn can have tax implications. Similarly, changes that alter beneficiary rights may influence creditor claims or collection efforts. It is important to assess potential fiscal and creditor impacts when proposing modifications and to coordinate with financial or tax advisors where appropriate. Courts consider these consequences when evaluating petitions, and well-crafted petitions address potential implications to reduce unintended results and ensure that the modification achieves its intended objectives while minimizing adverse effects.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas