If you are considering a trust modification petition in Huntington Beach, this guide explains when and how to seek changes to an existing trust. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients evaluate whether a proposed modification is appropriate given the settlor’s intent, current family circumstances, and applicable California law. A modification can address life changes such as remarriage, shifting financial goals, property transfers, or changes in beneficiary needs. Understanding the petition process, potential obstacles, and likely timelines can help you make informed decisions about preserving and updating your estate plan while minimizing disputes and preserving family relationships.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to alter the terms or administration of a trust when negotiation with trustees or beneficiaries is not possible or when the change affects legal validity. In Huntington Beach, petitioning the probate court may be necessary to correct drafting errors, respond to changed circumstances, or interpret ambiguous provisions. This process can involve gathering trust documents, financial records, and statements from interested parties. Proper preparation and a clear legal strategy increase the likelihood the court will grant an appropriate modification that reflects the current needs of the trust and its beneficiaries.
Filing a trust modification petition can provide clarity and legal authority to implement changes that better reflect current intentions and circumstances. Petitioning the court can resolve ambiguities, correct mistakes, or permit adjustments when the settlor’s wishes cannot be carried out under the existing trust terms. This service helps protect beneficiaries’ interests, update distributions, and secure proper asset management. In many cases, a court-approved modification prevents future disputes by documenting the change and creating a clear record for trustees, financial institutions, and heirs, which can simplify administration and reduce the risk of contested proceedings later.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout Huntington Beach and Orange County in matters related to estate planning and trust administration. The firm assists individuals and families with trust drafting, trust modification petitions, probate matters, and related documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and powers of attorney. With a focus on practical, client-centered representation, the office guides clients through complex procedural requirements and court filings. The team prioritizes clear communication, thorough document review, and a steady approach to resolving disputes and achieving durable outcomes that reflect each client’s goals.
A trust modification petition asks a court to change the terms, administration, or enforcement of an existing trust when informal solutions are unavailable or ineffective. In California, petitions may seek court approval for modifications due to changed circumstances, corrections to drafting errors, or to interpret ambiguous trust language. The petition process requires demonstrating why the change is necessary or appropriate and often involves notifying interested parties, submitting relevant documents, and addressing possible objections. A successful petition results in a court order that clarifies authority and implements the requested changes under state law.
The trust modification process typically begins with document review and attempts at agreement among trustees and beneficiaries. If consensus cannot be reached, a petition is filed in the appropriate California court and supporting evidence is presented. The court will consider the settlor’s likely intent, the language of the trust, and the impact of any proposed change on affected parties. Hearings may be scheduled, and the court may appoint a mediator or require additional information. The outcome can range from minor clarifications to substantial revisions, always with an eye toward honoring the settlor’s original objectives where possible.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing that requests a court to modify, reform, or interpret a trust instrument. Reasons for filing can include ambiguous language, changes in family circumstances, errors in drafting, or practical difficulties in administration. The petition explains the factual and legal grounds for the requested action, identifies interested parties, and proposes a precise modification for the court to consider. The court evaluates whether the change aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether it is equitable for beneficiaries, ensuring the modification complies with California trust and probate statutes.
Core elements of a trust modification petition include a clear statement of the requested change, supporting factual evidence, legal authority, and the identification of affected parties. Process steps include filing the petition, serving notice to beneficiaries and trustees, presenting declarations and exhibits to the court, and attending hearings if objections arise. Courts may require mediation or additional documentation, including trust instruments and financial records. Effective petitions combine organized factual presentation with applicable legal standards to help the court find that the requested modification is justified and consistent with the settlor’s intent.
Understanding common terms helps demystify petitions and court procedures. Useful terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, modification, decanting, pour-over will, and trustee powers. Knowing these definitions clarifies roles and remedies available under California law. A clear grasp of terminology allows clients to participate meaningfully in discussions about proposed changes, anticipate potential disputes, and understand what evidence the court will weigh when considering a petition. This knowledge supports informed decisions and improves collaboration with counsel throughout the process.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and set its original terms. A trust modification petition often seeks to effectuate what the settlor intended or to adapt a trust when circumstances have changed since the settlor established it. Courts consider the settlor’s original objectives and documented statements when evaluating whether a requested change aligns with the underlying purpose of the trust. Understanding the settlor’s role is central to assessing whether a modification is appropriate and how the court may interpret ambiguous provisions.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered correction of a trust document to reflect the actual intent of the settlor when a drafting error or mistake has altered the meaning of the terms. A petition for reformation presents evidence showing the intended language or effect and explains why the current wording is inconsistent with that intention. Courts in California may grant reformation when the evidence establishes that a mistake occurred and reforming the trust will better reflect the settlor’s documented wishes without harming beneficiaries’ legitimate expectations.
The trustee is the individual or institution responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust in accordance with the settlor’s directions. When a trustee’s administration is disputed or when authority is unclear, petitioning the court can clarify powers, remove or replace trustees, or direct trustees to take specific actions. The trustee’s duties include loyalty, prudence, and impartiality, and the court will consider whether proposed modifications affect those responsibilities or the balance among beneficiaries.
Modification is the legal alteration of trust terms approved by the court, either to correct an error, accommodate changed circumstances, or update administrative provisions. A modification can adjust distribution provisions, trustee powers, or administrative procedures to better match the settlor’s intent or changing realities. Courts assess whether the modification is consistent with legal standards and with the trust’s purpose, and may require notice to beneficiaries and a showing that the change is necessary or appropriate under the law.
When a trust needs change, several legal options exist, including unilaterally modifying by settlor action if powers remain, reaching an agreement among beneficiaries and trustees, decanting assets to a new trust, or petitioning the court for reformation or modification. Each option has legal implications based on the trust’s terms and California statutes. Informal agreement can be quickest but requires consensus. Court petitions provide authoritative resolution when parties disagree or when the change affects legal rights. Evaluating the risks and likely outcomes helps determine the most appropriate path.
If the settlor remains alive and retained explicit amendment powers in the trust instrument, making changes directly through the procedure outlined in the trust can avoid court involvement. This route is typically faster and less costly because it follows the trust’s own modification clause and requires fewer formal steps. However, the settlor must follow the trust’s formalities and ensure that all parties with interests are properly informed when the change affects beneficiary rights. Proper documentation of the amendment helps prevent later disputes and clarifies intentions for trustees and institutions.
When all beneficiaries and trustees reach a unanimous written agreement to modify the trust, the parties can often implement changes without court intervention. This cooperative approach preserves privacy and reduces costs. It works best when the proposed changes are straightforward, do not affect third-party rights, and all interested persons are capable of consenting. Clear written agreements, notarization when necessary, and updated trust documents or amendments ensure the changes are recognized by financial institutions and future trustees, minimizing the chance of later disputes.
If beneficiaries disagree or the trust contains ambiguous language that cannot be resolved by negotiation, filing a petition with the court may be the appropriate course. Judicial involvement provides an authoritative ruling that clarifies intent, rectifies errors, or resolves contested administration issues. This process typically requires thorough factual support, legal argument, and careful notice to all interested parties. While a court petition is more time-consuming and can involve hearings, it reduces the risk of continuing disputes and creates a clear legal record for future administration of the trust.
When requested changes significantly affect distributions, creditor rights, or trustee powers, a court petition helps ensure the modification is legally sound and enforceable. Significant revisions may impact expectations of multiple beneficiaries or third parties, and judicial approval can balance competing interests while confirming that the change complies with statutory standards. In such situations, careful preparation of evidence and legal briefing supports a favorable outcome and reduces the likelihood of subsequent challenges to the modified terms.
A comprehensive, court-approved modification secures a permanent, enforceable change to a trust and provides clarity for trustees, beneficiaries, and financial institutions. Court orders resolve disputes and create a public record that documents the rationale and legal basis for changes. This approach reduces ambiguity in future administration, protects the interests of vulnerable beneficiaries, and establishes a clear chain of authority for trustees to follow. While it can require more time and resources upfront, it often prevents prolonged litigation and preserves estate plan objectives over the long term.
Pursuing a comprehensive modification through the courts also helps ensure that complicated or sensitive issues, such as beneficiary incapacity, creditor claims, or tax consequences, are addressed carefully. Courts can supervise implementation to avoid unintended consequences and can structure remedies that balance competing concerns. The formal process also encourages full disclosure and equitable treatment of interested parties, thereby fostering finality and stability in trust administration and reducing the chance of renewed disputes after the change is implemented.
A court-ordered modification provides finality that informal changes may lack, protecting trustees and beneficiaries from later challenges when the modification is properly documented. Legal protection through a court order assures financial institutions and fiduciaries that they can follow the revised terms without fear of liability. This stability benefits long-term administration of the trust and gives beneficiaries confidence that distributions and management will adhere to the modified plan. The court’s oversight ensures the change meets legal standards and reflects a reasoned resolution of conflicting interests.
Courts can tailor remedies to the unique facts of a case, which is especially helpful when adjustments are complex or multifaceted. Supervised implementation ensures that trustee duties are redefined as needed and that distributions or administrative changes occur under judicial oversight. This approach can accommodate sensitive family dynamics, special needs trusts, retirement plan issues, or tax-related concerns in ways that protect vulnerable beneficiaries and respect the settlor’s overall goals. Judicial supervision also minimizes the risk of misinterpretation or misapplication of revised terms.
Before filing a petition, compile the trust document, all amendments, related wills, financial statements, beneficiary designations, and records of prior distributions. Accurate and comprehensive records support factual assertions in the petition and simplify the court’s review. Clear documentation of asset ownership, account numbers, and recent trustee actions reduces delay and helps identify potential conflicts. Early organization also aids in crafting a focused petition that explains the need for modification and demonstrates how the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent and the trust’s purpose.
Evaluate the timing of any proposed modification with regard to potential tax consequences, creditor claims, or impacts on government benefits for beneficiaries. Some changes can alter tax treatment of distributions or affect eligibility for public benefits. Anticipating these consequences and presenting possible safeguards to the court helps ensure the modification serves the best interests of beneficiaries. Consulting with financial or tax counsel in coordination with legal representation can result in better-structured petitions and outcomes that preserve assets and benefits while implementing the settlor’s updated intentions.
People seek trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting errors, updating distribution rules to reflect family changes, clarifying trustee powers, or addressing unforeseen administrative problems. A court-approved change can reconcile the trust’s text with the settlor’s true intent or adapt to new facts such as changes in beneficiaries’ needs, relocations, or significant changes to the trust’s assets. When informal remedies are not available or there are competing interests among beneficiaries, a petition provides a formal mechanism to resolve issues and secure legal authority for the revised plan.
Another reason to consider a petition is to remove ambiguity that hinders trustees’ ability to manage assets or fulfill duties. Unclear terms can cause delays, lead to inconsistent administration, and create opportunities for conflict. A court ruling can eliminate uncertainty, authorize needed transactions, and delineate responsibilities for trustees and beneficiaries. In cases where third-party institutions require judicial confirmation before honoring changes, a court order often unlocks the ability to transfer assets, change account ownership, or carry out distributions according to the revised terms.
Typical situations prompting a trust modification petition include ambiguous trust language, mistakes in drafting, a trustee’s refusal to act, changes in beneficiary circumstances such as disability or financial hardship, and asset changes like retirement accounts or closely held business interests. Other triggers include newly discovered assets, unforeseen tax issues, or the need to remove or replace a trustee. Recognizing these circumstances early and preparing supporting evidence increases the chance of a favorable outcome and helps protect the interests of all parties involved.
When trust provisions are ambiguous or conflict with one another, trustees may be unable to act confidently, and beneficiaries may disagree over entitlement. A petition can ask the court to interpret the language, determine the settlor’s intent, and provide instructions for administration. This remedy is particularly helpful when documentary evidence such as drafts, correspondence, or contemporaneous notes sheds light on the intended meaning. A judicial interpretation resolves ongoing uncertainty and enables trustees to manage assets and distributions in a manner consistent with the settlor’s goals.
Significant changes in a beneficiary’s life, such as incapacity, long-term medical needs, or financial distress, can justify a modification to ensure appropriate care and support. A petition can restructure distributions, create targeted provisions like a special needs trust, or adjust timing to better meet current needs. Courts review these requests with attention to the trust’s purpose and the fairness among beneficiaries. Proper documentation of the beneficiary’s circumstances and the proposed protective measures strengthens the petition and helps secure a practical solution.
Drafting errors or omissions discovered after a trust is executed can produce unintended results that undermine the settlor’s plan. A petition for reformation asks the court to correct the document to reflect the true intent when evidence shows a mistake occurred. This may involve clarifying beneficiary designations, restoring omitted assets to the trust, or correcting technical language that affects administration. Courts will consider evidence such as earlier drafts, communications, and surrounding circumstances to determine whether reformation is warranted and what corrective wording should be adopted.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation for trust modification petitions in Huntington Beach and Orange County. The firm assists clients with document preparation, court filings, notice requirements, and hearing preparation. Local knowledge of county court practices and procedural rules can be an asset when navigating filings and calendar scheduling. Clients receive clear guidance on options, expected timelines, and potential outcomes, and the office works to preserve family relationships and financial interests while pursuing the appropriate legal remedy for trust modifications.
Choosing the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman means partnering with a Huntington Beach firm focused on thoughtful, thorough representation for estate planning and trust disputes. We prepare petitions with careful attention to evidentiary support and procedural detail, helping to minimize delays and address objections efficiently. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with clients and interested parties so that everyone understands the case strategy, potential outcomes, and next steps. This steady approach helps protect beneficiaries’ interests and supports effective resolution of trust-related disputes.
The firm guides clients through pre-filing steps such as document collection, beneficiary outreach, and settlement efforts, and then proceeds with court filings when litigation is necessary. We tailor petitions to the facts of each case, explaining legal standards and likely timelines. By preparing thorough declarations, exhibits, and legal arguments, the office seeks to present a persuasive case to the court while being mindful of cost and time. Clients receive practical recommendations about when to pursue court action and how to limit the scope of contested issues.
In addition to handling modifications, the firm assists with related estate planning instruments like revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, HIPAA authorizations, and guardianship nominations. Where tax or benefit impacts may arise, we coordinate with financial and tax advisors to protect beneficiaries and preserve assets. Our goal is to implement modifications that reflect current needs while ensuring durable, enforceable results that facilitate future administration and reduce the potential for renewed disputes.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and related documents to determine whether a petition is appropriate and what grounds support the requested change. We then organize evidence, prepare a clear petition, and handle required service and notice to interested parties. If settlement efforts fail, we represent clients in court hearings and present declarations and exhibits supporting the requested modification. Throughout the process, we keep clients informed of strategy, timeline, and potential risks, working to secure an outcome that aligns with the trust’s purpose and the client’s objectives.
In the first stage we review the trust documents, amendments, beneficiary designations, and relevant financial records to identify the legal basis for modification. We interview clients and gather any contemporaneous communications or drafts that shed light on the settlor’s intent. This preparation allows us to recommend the most efficient route—whether informal agreement, decanting, or a court petition—and to outline a strategy that balances speed, cost, and the likelihood of success.
Collecting all relevant documents is essential to support a petition or negotiate a settlement. We obtain trust instruments, amendment records, financial statements, account histories, and any correspondence reflecting the settlor’s intentions. These materials form the foundation of declarations and exhibits that explain the need for modification. Organizing this evidence early reduces delays and strengthens the factual record presented to the court or other parties.
We identify and evaluate the interests of trustees, beneficiaries, and other stakeholders to anticipate objections and consider potential compromises. Early assessment of likely positions allows us to tailor the petition and settlement offers to address reasonable concerns, and to propose narrowly tailored remedies that limit litigation. Understanding the viewpoints of all interested parties increases the chance of a negotiated resolution and prepares us for effective advocacy if court action is required.
When negotiation is not possible, we prepare and file the trust modification petition with the appropriate California court and ensure that all required parties receive proper notice. The petition presents factual declarations, legal arguments, and proposed revised language for the trust. Proper service and compliance with procedural rules are critical to avoid delays or dismissal. We handle filing deadlines, prepare necessary exhibits, and coordinate with the court clerk to schedule hearings and meet local requirements.
Drafting the petition requires clear, concise statements of facts and a legal theory that supports the requested modification. We prepare declarations from relevant witnesses, attach supporting exhibits, and draft an order for the court’s consideration. Attention to detail in these filings helps the court understand the requested remedy and the evidence supporting it, which is particularly important when addressing drafting errors or complex family situations.
Once the petition is filed, we serve notice to beneficiaries, trustees, and any other interested parties and monitor responses. If objections arise, we prepare replies, negotiate where possible, and represent clients at hearings. The firm seeks to resolve objections through settlement or persuasion while remaining prepared to present the matter to the court for resolution. Properly documenting service and responses preserves procedural rights and supports a focused hearing on the merits of the requested change.
At hearings, we present evidence and legal argument supporting the modification and address counterarguments from opposing parties. The court evaluates the petition under California law and issues an order granting or denying the requested relief, with any conditions the judge deems appropriate. If the petition is granted, we assist with implementing the court order, updating trust documents, notifying financial institutions, and ensuring trustees and beneficiaries comply with revised terms to facilitate smooth administration going forward.
Our hearing preparation includes organizing witness testimony, finalizing declarations, and preparing a concise argument that helps the judge understand why the modification is warranted. We anticipate potential lines of attack and prepare responses supported by evidence and applicable law. Presenting a well-organized case at the hearing increases the likelihood the court will adopt the proposed wording and grants the relief necessary for reliable trust administration.
After the court issues an order, we guide implementation by revising trust documents as required, preparing certified copies for financial institutions, and advising trustees on new duties. We also assist with any recordation, account retitling, or formal notices needed to effectuate the change. These follow-up steps ensure that the court’s decision translates into practical administration and that trustees and beneficiaries understand and comply with the revised terms.
A trust modification petition is a formal court request to alter the terms or administration of an existing trust when informal measures are not available or sufficient. Typical reasons include correcting drafting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous language, or adapting the trust to changed circumstances such as beneficiary needs or asset composition. The petition explains the requested change, presents supporting evidence, and asks the court to issue an order implementing the modification. Courts evaluate whether the change aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether it complies with California trust law. Many situations that appear to require court action can begin with efforts to reach agreement among trustees and beneficiaries. When consensus is not possible or when significant rights are affected, filing a petition ensures a binding resolution. The process involves notice, supporting declarations, and often a hearing. A successful petition results in a court order that clarifies administration and reduces the risk of future disputes over trust terms.
If the settlor is alive and retained the power to amend or revoke the trust, they can usually modify the trust according to the procedures set out in the document without involving the court. This direct method is often simpler and faster, provided the settlor acts in accordance with the trust’s formalities and any relevant state statutes. Written amendments or a restated trust that comply with the trust’s terms are generally effective to change provisions while the settlor has capacity. However, if the settlor’s authority is unclear, if the settlor lacks capacity, or if beneficiaries dispute the change, court involvement may become necessary. Courts can step in to interpret ambiguous powers, determine capacity questions, or authorize modifications when the settlor’s intent must be established through evidence or when third-party approvals are required.
In a reformation case, the court considers evidence that sheds light on the settlor’s actual intent and whether a drafting mistake or omission occurred. Relevant materials may include earlier drafts of the trust, correspondence, contemporaneous notes, statements from individuals involved in drafting, and surrounding circumstances at the time the trust was executed. The court weighs documentary evidence and testimonial declarations to determine whether the written instrument diverged from the settlor’s intended language. The standard for reformation requires persuasive proof of a mistake or a clear demonstration that the trust’s terms fail to reflect the settlor’s intent. Courts balance the need to honor the settlor’s true wishes with the requirement to protect beneficiaries’ rights and ensure fairness in administration, so well-organized evidence is critical to success.
Timelines for trust modification petitions vary based on the complexity of the issues, the level of disagreement among parties, and court scheduling. Simple, uncontested petitions that address minor clarifications may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months if there are no objections and the court’s calendar permits. More complex or contested matters that require hearings and extensive evidence can take several months to over a year to reach final resolution. Early preparation, thorough documentation, and efforts to narrow disputed issues can shorten the timeline. Local court practices in Orange County, including mandatory mediation programs and hearing availability, also influence the pace of proceedings. Clients benefit from a realistic timetable and periodic updates so they can plan accordingly.
A court-ordered modification can have effects on creditor claims and public benefits depending on the nature of the change. If the modification alters asset ownership or distribution timing, creditors may assert claims against assets depending on the timing of changes and applicable creditor protection rules. Similarly, changes that affect eligibility for government benefits, such as Medicaid or Supplemental Security Income, must be handled carefully to avoid unintended loss of benefits for vulnerable beneficiaries. Because these issues can be complex, petitions that could affect creditor rights or public benefits often require coordination with financial and benefits advisors. Courts can sometimes structure orders to limit adverse effects, and careful planning helps align the modification with legal protections for both assets and benefits eligibility.
Yes, a petition can request removal or replacement of a trustee when grounds for removal exist, such as failure to perform fiduciary duties, conflicts of interest, incapacity, or breach of trust. The petition should present factual evidence showing the trustee’s conduct and explain why removal is necessary for proper administration. The court will consider the trustee’s performance, the interests of beneficiaries, and whether removal serves the trust’s purpose and asset protection. If removal is granted, the court can appoint a successor trustee or direct an alternative solution to maintain continuity of administration. When requesting removal, it is important to propose a practical successor plan to minimize disruption and ensure that trust assets continue to be managed responsibly under the court’s supervision or transition plan.
Alternatives to filing a petition include attempting to negotiate a written agreement among all beneficiaries and trustees, using decanting powers if allowed by the trust instrument and state law to move assets into a new trust with revised terms, or seeking mediation to reach a compromise. These alternative solutions can preserve privacy, reduce expense, and produce faster resolutions when parties are willing to cooperate. The feasibility of these options depends on the trust’s language and the willingness of interested parties to participate. When informal approaches fail or when legal authority is required to effect certain changes, a court petition may remain the most reliable route. Before choosing a path, carefully consider the trade-offs between privacy, cost, enforceability, and the potential for future disputes, and document any agreements reached to prevent future misunderstandings.
Costs and attorney fees in trust modification cases vary with complexity, the need for hearings, and whether the matter is contested. Many courts allow recovery of reasonable attorney fees only in limited circumstances, such as when a statute or the trust instrument authorizes fee shifting or when a party’s conduct warrants sanctions. Parties should expect initial costs for document preparation, filing fees, and service, with additional costs if hearings, discovery, or expert consultation become necessary. We discuss fee structures and likely costs during the initial consultation and strive for cost-effective representation. Where possible, we seek to contain expenses through focused filings, negotiation, and settlement efforts, and we provide clear estimates and periodic billing so clients can make informed decisions about proceeding.
When beneficiaries reside in different states, jurisdictional questions may arise about where to file a petition and which state’s laws govern certain trust issues. Typically, petitions are filed in the state where the trust is administered or where the trust assets are located, but specific facts about the trust’s situs and governing law may affect the appropriate forum. Serving out-of-state beneficiaries requires adherence to service rules and may extend timelines for responses. Coordination with counsel in other jurisdictions may be required to ensure proper notice and to address conflicts of law. Identifying the trust’s designated governing law and administration location early in the process helps determine the correct venue and ensures that all interested parties receive proper notice and opportunity to respond.
To begin a trust modification petition with the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, contact our Huntington Beach office to schedule an initial review. During that consultation we will gather relevant documents, discuss the circumstances prompting the requested change, and explain possible routes for resolution. We will also review likely timelines and costs and recommend next steps, including any immediate measures to preserve rights or prevent irreversible actions by trustees or third parties. If you decide to proceed, we will organize your documents, communicate with interested parties, and prepare a targeted petition or settlement approach. Our goal is to provide a clear plan and steady representation through filing, hearings, and implementation to secure a solution that aligns with your objectives and protects the trust’s intended purposes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas