If you are considering changes to an existing trust in La Habra, a trust modification petition can provide a legal route to update terms, address life changes, or correct drafting issues. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients across Orange County and California with practical legal support for matters involving revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related estate planning documents. This introductory overview explains when a modification petition may be appropriate, what the general process involves, and how we approach each situation with an emphasis on minimizing conflict and preserving the trust maker’s intent while complying with state law and local court procedures.
Many people face situations where a trust no longer reflects their current circumstances, such as remarriage, changes in assets, the birth of a child, or evolving tax considerations. A trust modification petition may be needed when formal amendments are not feasible or when the trust terms are ambiguous or outdated. Our office helps clients determine whether a judicial modification or other remedy is the right path, and we prepare petitions, supporting affidavits, and documentation required by the court. We also coordinate related documents like financial powers of attorney and advance health care directives to maintain an integrated estate plan across life changes.
A trust modification petition can provide clarity and updated authority when a trust’s terms no longer serve the trust maker’s intentions or when circumstances make the original provisions impractical. By pursuing a petition, beneficiaries and trustees may resolve ambiguities, correct drafting mistakes, and realign distributions or trustee powers to reflect current family and financial realities. This process reduces the risk of costly disputes later and helps safeguard assets for intended heirs. Properly framed petitions can also address changes in law or tax treatment that affect the trust, ensuring the trust continues to function as an effective component of an overall estate plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized estate planning and trust administration services to clients throughout California. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful document drafting, and thoughtful planning to reduce later litigation and family conflict. We counsel clients on a range of estate planning tools, including revocable living trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, special needs trusts, and pet trusts, and we represent clients in the preparation and filing of trust modification petitions when changes are necessary. Our focus is on practical solutions tailored to each client’s circumstances and on helping families preserve wealth and peace of mind.
Trust modification petitions are formal requests to the probate or superior court to change, reform, or modify the terms of an existing trust. In California, a petition may be appropriate when the trust maker’s intent is unclear, when a drafting error creates unintended consequences, or when all interested parties agree on a change but the trust document lacks a valid amendment procedure. The petition process typically requires factual declarations, legal argument, and sometimes evidence of consent from beneficiaries or proof of changed circumstances. Courts evaluate petitions with an eye toward honoring the settlor’s intent while ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and public policy.
There are different legal grounds for seeking a modification, including reformation to correct mistakes, modification to reflect changed circumstances, or court approval of nonjudicial settlement agreements where permitted by law. The procedural steps can include preparing the petition, serving notices to interested parties, providing the court with evidence and legal authority, and attending hearings. Parties may negotiate solutions to avoid contested litigation, and mediation can be an effective tool. Throughout the process, the focus is on achieving a result that aligns the trust with the settlor’s intentions while protecting beneficiary rights under California law.
A trust modification petition is a court pleading that asks the judge to modify, reform, or interpret a trust document. It is used when informal amendment is impossible or when there is a disagreement about the trust’s terms or intent. The petition explains the legal basis for change, provides factual background, and requests specific relief, such as reformation to correct a mistake or modification to accommodate new circumstances. Supporting documents and declarations typically accompany the petition to establish why the change is necessary and how it will further the trust maker’s original objectives while complying with statutory and case law standards.
Successful petitions require clear documentation of the trust maker’s intent, evidence supporting the need for change, and precise proposed revisions to the trust instrument. Essential steps include reviewing the original trust and related estate planning documents, gathering declarations from interested parties, providing legal citations for the requested relief, and ensuring proper notice to beneficiaries and other parties with standing. Courts may consider extrinsic evidence, such as correspondence or draft documents, to determine intent. Effective petitions frame the requested modification as the most reasonable way to honor the settlor’s wishes while protecting the interests of current beneficiaries and complying with statutory constraints.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, modification, pour-over will, and certification of trust are frequently used in pleadings and court proceedings. Knowing these definitions assists clients in following legal documents and in communicating their goals. This section provides clear, practical definitions and examples so that clients can better understand filings, requirements, and possible outcomes. A well-informed client can collaborate more effectively with legal counsel and make decisions that align with long-term planning objectives while reducing the likelihood of future disputes.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s intentions, as expressed in the trust instrument and related documents, guide courts when interpreting or modifying a trust. In many cases, the settlor has the power to amend or revoke a revocable trust during their lifetime, but if the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, a court petition may be necessary to address errors, ambiguities, or unexpected circumstances. Understanding the settlor’s documented objectives is essential when proposing a modification to ensure the adjustment aligns with the original purpose of the trust.
Reformation is a judicial remedy used to correct mistakes in a trust document so that the written terms reflect the settlor’s true intent. Reformation petitions typically rely on extrinsic evidence showing that a drafting error or mutual mistake led to language that does not match what the settlor intended. Courts will evaluate the totality of evidence, including drafts, correspondence, and testimony, to determine whether reformation is warranted. The goal is not to rewrite the trust for convenience but to correct a defect so the trust performs as the settlor originally intended.
Modification involves changing the terms of a trust to reflect new circumstances or to permit an arrangement the settlor likely would have approved if aware of the changed facts. Unlike reformation, which corrects errors, modification often addresses changed needs, such as tax law shifts, family dynamics, or asset changes. When all interested parties consent, courts sometimes approve modifications more readily; when there is disagreement, the court evaluates whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent and public policy considerations under California law.
Certainty of intent refers to the clarity with which a trust maker expressed their wishes in the trust document. Courts prefer to honor the settlor’s documented intent, and when language is ambiguous, judges may allow extrinsic evidence to clarify meaning. Petitions that clearly demonstrate the settlor’s intent and how the proposed change restores or preserves that intent are more persuasive. Ensuring that trust language is precise at the outset reduces the need for later petitions, but when ambiguity exists, objective evidence and consistent planning documents can support a request to reform or modify the trust.
When a trust requires adjustment, there are several legal avenues to consider: informal amendment by the settlor, nonjudicial settlement agreements, petitions for reformation or modification, and, in limited situations, trust decanting or judicial termination. Each option has different procedural requirements and implications for notice, timing, and potential challenges by beneficiaries. Choosing the right route depends on the settlor’s capacity, whether all parties agree, the nature of the change, and whether the original trust permits certain nonjudicial actions. We evaluate each option carefully to recommend the approach most likely to achieve a durable, enforceable result.
If the trust maker is alive and of sufficient capacity, the simplest approach is often a direct amendment or restatement of the trust document itself. This avoids court involvement and allows immediate implementation of changes, such as updating beneficiaries, adjusting trustee powers, or clarifying distributions. Proper drafting is essential to prevent future disputes, so amendments should be prepared carefully and executed according to the trust’s amendment provisions. Even when changes seem straightforward, coordinating related documents—like powers of attorney or advance health care directives—ensures a consistent plan across all estate planning instruments.
When all interested parties agree on a modification, a nonjudicial settlement agreement can often accomplish the desired change without formal litigation. This approach depends on the trust’s terms and applicable law but can be faster and less adversarial. Parties negotiate the terms, document agreements, and, when necessary, record or file paperwork that conveys the new arrangement. It is important to confirm that such agreements are permissible under the trust document and state law, and to ensure the agreement protects the rights of all beneficiaries and addresses potential tax or creditor implications before finalizing any nonjudicial resolution.
If beneficiaries or trustees dispute the meaning of trust provisions, or if the trust contains ambiguous clauses that cannot be resolved through nonjudicial means, a comprehensive legal approach including a court petition may be necessary. Litigation can be sensitive and lengthy, requiring careful preparation of evidence, persuasive legal argument, and clear proposals for how the trust should be reformed or modified. The objective is to arrive at a legally sound outcome that reflects the settlor’s intent while minimizing damage to family relationships and preserving trust assets for their intended purpose.
Major life events such as divorce, remarriage, the birth of new family members, or substantial changes in asset composition can make existing trust terms inadequate or unfair. In such cases, a full legal review and possible court petition ensure that trust terms are updated in a way that aligns with both the settlor’s objectives and current legal requirements. A comprehensive approach also considers tax consequences, creditor exposure, and the interaction between the trust and other estate planning tools like irrevocable life insurance trusts, retirement plan trusts, and special needs trusts to create a cohesive and durable plan.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification provides legal certainty and reduces the likelihood of future challenges by clearly documenting the reasons for change and obtaining court approval where appropriate. Court-sanctioned modifications tend to carry greater finality, which can protect trustees and beneficiaries from later disputes. Additionally, a comprehensive review allows for coordination among all estate planning instruments, such as pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and guardianship nominations, ensuring consistent directions for asset distribution and health care decisions. This holistic review helps preserve family harmony and protect assets for intended beneficiaries over time.
Beyond dispute avoidance, a thorough process identifies secondary issues that might otherwise be overlooked, such as outdated beneficiary designations on retirement accounts or incomplete certification of trust documents. Addressing these matters during a single review reduces administrative burdens later and helps trustees carry out their duties efficiently. Where tax or creditor considerations are involved, a comprehensive strategy can recommend parallel planning steps to mitigate negative impacts. Ultimately, the goal is a durable, legally sound trust structure that advances the settlor’s objectives while minimizing friction and administrative complexity for trustees and beneficiaries.
One key advantage of pursuing a court-approved modification is the added finality it provides. When a judge approves a modification or reformation, the resulting order can limit future challenges and provide trustees with clear authority to act. This outcome can be particularly valuable when trust terms affect multiple beneficiaries or when significant assets are involved. By securing judicial confirmation, parties can move forward with confidence that the trust will operate according to the revised terms, reducing uncertainty and the chance of future litigation that could deplete trust assets and strain family relationships.
A comprehensive modification process allows for simultaneous review of related estate planning documents, ensuring they all work together harmoniously. For example, updating a trust might require revisiting a pour-over will, power of attorney, advance health care directive, HIPAA authorization, and beneficiary designations on retirement accounts. Addressing these elements together reduces inconsistency and prevents gaps in the plan that could create administrative complications or unintended distributions. Coordinated planning helps preserve the settlor’s overall goals and makes future administration more straightforward for trustees and family members.
Gathering all relevant documents at the outset can streamline the petition process and shorten the timeline to resolution. Important items include the original trust instrument, any amendments or restatements, prior wills such as pour-over wills, beneficiary designations, related powers of attorney, and correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intentions. Early collection of bank statements, property deeds, and retirement account documents also helps identify assets that may be governed by the trust. Having complete records reduces the need for repeated information requests, supports clear factual declarations, and strengthens the presentation to the court or other parties during negotiation.
When disagreements arise, mediation can be an effective, less adversarial alternative to contested hearings. A mediated resolution allows parties to explore creative solutions, preserve relationships, and avoid the expense and uncertainty of litigation. Mediation sessions focus on mutual interests and practical outcomes, and any resulting agreement can often be presented to the court for approval to give it legal effect. Preparing documentation and a clear presentation of the trust maker’s intent before mediation increases the likelihood of a productive outcome and reduces the chance that unresolved issues will resurface later.
There are many circumstances that prompt consideration of a trust modification petition, including changes in family structure such as marriage or divorce, the birth of grandchildren, the death of key beneficiaries or trustees, and significant shifts in asset values or tax law. Additionally, a trust may contain drafting errors or ambiguous language that prevents orderly administration. In these situations, a petition can clarify intent, correct mistakes, and adapt trust terms to new realities. Addressing problems proactively through legal channels helps avoid administrative delays and protects assets for their intended recipients.
Other common triggers include outdated beneficiary designations on financial accounts, failure to account for newly acquired property, or the settlor’s desire to change fiduciary powers. Sometimes trustees need explicit court authority to act in unusual circumstances or to resolve conflicts among beneficiaries. A petition can also be useful when updating a trust to incorporate new planning techniques or to coordinate with other instruments like irrevocable life insurance trusts, special needs trusts, or retirement plan trusts. Each case requires careful assessment to ensure that the requested change is appropriate and legally supported.
Common scenarios include correcting drafting mistakes, clarifying ambiguous distribution instructions, accommodating changed family circumstances, and addressing conflicts among beneficiaries or trustees. Other reasons include updating trustee succession provisions, resolving issues related to blended families, and adjusting terms when assets have significantly appreciated or depreciated. Courts also consider petitions to modify trusts for tax planning reasons or to permit trustee actions that the original document did not clearly contemplate. Identifying the specific trigger helps determine the best legal approach and whether a nonjudicial agreement or court petition is the proper remedy.
Drafting errors or ambiguous language in a trust instrument can lead to confusion about distribution instructions or trustee powers, making administration difficult and increasing the risk of disputes. When a drafting mistake is evident from the document and supporting evidence, a petition for reformation may be appropriate to correct the language and reflect the trust maker’s true intentions. The process typically involves presenting extrinsic evidence, such as earlier drafts or communications, that demonstrates the discrepancy between the document as written and what the trust maker actually intended to accomplish.
Events such as divorce, remarriage, births, and deaths alter the family dynamics that often underlie a trust maker’s planning choices. These changes can render existing trust provisions unfair or inconsistent with current wishes. A modification petition can realign the trust with current family circumstances, updating beneficiaries, trustee instructions, or distribution timing to better reflect new priorities. Courts will consider whether the proposed change honors the settlor’s documented objectives and whether it is consistent with legal standards for trust modification under California law.
Substantial changes in the composition or value of assets, as well as shifts in tax law, can affect how a trust should function to meet estate planning goals. For instance, the addition of business interests, significant real estate holdings, or changes in estate tax exposure may prompt a review and modification of trust terms. A court-approved change can ensure that trustees have appropriate authority to manage new asset types and that distributions are structured to account for tax consequences and creditor considerations, preserving the settlor’s objectives while adapting to new financial realities.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves families in La Habra and throughout Orange County by providing practical legal guidance for trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We help clients assess options, prepare petitions, coordinate notice to beneficiaries, and represent clients in court or in negotiated settlements. Our goal is to achieve clear, defensible outcomes that preserve the trust maker’s intent and reduce conflict among family members. Contact us to discuss your situation and explore whether a petition or another approach is the right solution for your trust-related needs.
Clients work with the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we provide attentive, practical counsel tailored to each family’s circumstances. We focus on clear communication and careful documentation to support petitions for reformation or modification. Our process includes a comprehensive review of the trust and related instruments, identification of legal and factual issues, and preparation of pleadings and declarations that present a persuasive case to the court or facilitate negotiated resolutions. We aim to protect client interests while promoting efficient, durable outcomes for trustees and beneficiaries.
Our representation extends beyond filing petitions: we help coordinate updates to associated documents like pour-over wills, financial powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and certification of trust forms so that all elements of the estate plan work together. We also advise on practical administration steps trustees should take during and after any modification, including recordkeeping and distribution procedures that minimize liability and confusion. The result is a streamlined process that reduces administration delays and supports orderly trust management for the future.
We understand that trust disputes and modification proceedings can be emotionally charged, so we strive to handle matters with sensitivity and professionalism. Whether negotiating a nonjudicial agreement or presenting a petition to the court, our approach emphasizes clear legal reasoning, thorough preparation, and practical solutions. We work to preserve relationships when possible and to secure legally sound resolutions when litigation is unavoidable. Clients benefit from focused attention, timely communication, and a commitment to achieving outcomes that reflect the trust maker’s intentions and protect beneficiary interests.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to understand the trust’s terms, related instruments, and the facts prompting a change. We identify the legal grounds for modification, collect supporting evidence, and propose specific revisions. When appropriate, we initiate communication with interested parties to explore nonlitigation solutions. If a petition is necessary, we prepare and file the petition, serve required notices, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we prioritize clear timelines, regular updates, and practical guidance for trustees managing trust administration during the process.
The initial review stage focuses on understanding the trust instrument, any prior amendments, related estate planning documents, and the specific reasons prompting a change. We gather evidence that may include earlier drafts, communications, and financial records to support the proposed modification. This phase also includes evaluating whether nonjudicial options are viable and discussing likely timelines and costs. By carefully planning from the outset, we aim to present a clear, well-supported case that either resolves issues without court involvement or positions a petition for success if judicial intervention becomes necessary.
Collecting and analyzing relevant documents is essential to framing a persuasive petition. This includes the original trust, amendments, pour-over wills, beneficiary designations, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that illuminates the trust maker’s intent. Detailed analysis helps identify drafting defects, conflicts among documents, or changed circumstances that justify modification. The evidence gathered supports declarations and legal arguments in the petition and can also form the basis for negotiated resolutions with interested parties, reducing the likelihood of time-consuming litigation.
After reviewing documents, we prepare a preliminary legal assessment that outlines viable avenues for change and recommends a strategy tailored to the client’s objectives. This assessment considers whether reformation, modification, or a nonjudicial agreement is most appropriate, and it anticipates possible challenges from interested parties. We also discuss likely timelines, potential costs, and steps required to protect assets during the process. The assessment helps clients make informed decisions about pursuing court action versus negotiation or amendment where permissible.
If a court petition is required, we prepare pleadings, declarations, and exhibits that concisely present the factual basis and legal authority for the requested relief. Proper service to interested parties is handled according to court rules, and we file the petition with the appropriate court. Preparation also includes drafting proposed orders and redlined trust language for the judge’s consideration. During this stage, clear and organized documentation increases the chances of a favorable resolution, whether by court ruling or negotiated settlement following the petition’s filing.
Drafting the petition involves presenting a clear narrative of the facts and law that justify modification or reformation. Supporting declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or others with personal knowledge provide the factual foundation. Exhibits—such as original drafts, financial documents, and correspondence—demonstrate inconsistencies or changes in circumstances. The petition must also propose specific language changes or other relief for the court to consider. Meticulous drafting and careful organization of exhibits help the court understand the requested relief and the reasons it serves the settlor’s intent.
After filing, proper service and notice to interested parties ensure everyone with standing has an opportunity to respond. Notice requirements vary depending on the relief sought and the identities of beneficiaries and trustees. Providing clear notice supports due process and can encourage early negotiation or resolution. Parties who receive notice may raise objections or enter into settlement discussions. Handling service correctly and documenting responses protects the integrity of the proceeding and positions the case for efficient handling by the court.
Following filing and service, the case may proceed to hearings where the court evaluates evidence and legal arguments. In many matters, parties reach a negotiated settlement before a contested hearing, which can then be presented to the court for approval. If the court approves the petition, it will issue an order reflecting the modification or reformation and provide guidance for implementation. After resolution, we assist with updating trust records, communicating changes to trustees and beneficiaries, and ensuring that related documents and asset titles reflect the new terms.
Court hearings focus on the admissible evidence and legal arguments that support the requested modification. Declarations, exhibits, and witness testimony, where necessary, are used to demonstrate the settlor’s intent and the need for change. Counsel presents proposed revised language and explains why it aligns with the settlor’s objectives and legal standards. Judges evaluate whether the proposed change is legally permissible and whether it appropriately balances the interests of beneficiaries and trustees, often seeking to avoid results that would unfairly harm any interested party.
After the court issues an order approving the modification, implementation steps include updating trust records, retitling assets if necessary, and updating ancillary documents such as certification of trust forms and financial institution records. Trustees should receive clear written instructions and maintain records of distributions or transfers. We also review beneficiary designations, retirement account assignments, and related documents to ensure consistency with the revised trust. These post-approval measures help trustees administer the trust efficiently and reduce the chance of future disputes.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the court asking for changes to an existing trust when informal amendment is not possible or when disputes arise that cannot be resolved by agreement. Reasons for filing include ambiguous language, drafting errors, changed family circumstances, or asset changes that make the original trust terms impractical. The petition explains the legal and factual basis for the requested change and proposes specific revisions. Filing often requires supporting declarations, exhibits, and proper notice to beneficiaries and trustees to ensure that the court has all relevant information to decide the matter. The court evaluates whether the requested relief aligns with the settlor’s likely intent and statutory standards under California law.
Reformation can correct genuine drafting mistakes when clear evidence shows that the written trust does not reflect the trust maker’s actual intent. Evidence may include earlier drafts, correspondence, or other documentation demonstrating the discrepancy between what was intended and what was drafted. Courts are cautious and require a persuasive showing that reformation is needed to correct an error rather than to rewrite terms for convenience. The reformation petition must clearly present the evidence and explain why the corrected language accurately reflects the settlor’s goals and avoids unfair outcomes for beneficiaries.
Beneficiary agreement can simplify changes and sometimes enable nonjudicial resolutions that avoid court petitions. When all interested parties consent and the trust document and law permit, a settlement agreement can effect a modification without litigation. However, unanimous consent is not always possible, and courts may still be necessary when parties disagree, when the settlor lacks capacity to amend directly, or when statutes require judicial oversight. Even when beneficiaries do not all agree, the petition process provides a formal forum to resolve disputes in a manner that seeks to honor the settlor’s intentions while protecting beneficiaries’ rights.
Timing varies depending on the complexity of the matter, whether parties agree, and court schedules. An uncontested modification with cooperative beneficiaries can be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months if documentation and consent are in place. Contested matters that require extensive discovery, multiple hearings, or complex factual records can take longer, depending on court availability and the need for evidentiary presentations. Early preparation, thorough documentation, and efforts to negotiate or mediate disputes can help reduce delays and move the matter to resolution more efficiently.
A court-approved modification generally provides greater finality than an informal change because the judge’s order clarifies the trust’s terms and the legal authority for trustees to act. While no outcome is completely immune from future challenge, a properly documented court order reduces the risk of successful subsequent disputes and gives trustees clearer direction for administration. Courts weigh the settlor’s intent and statutory standards, and a judicially sanctioned change is more defensible than an informal arrangement that lacks documentation or proper notice to interested parties.
Evidence for reformation typically includes drafts, communications, or other contemporaneous documents that show the settlor’s intent and the existence of a mistake in the final instrument. Affidavits or declarations from individuals with direct knowledge can corroborate the trust maker’s objectives and the circumstances surrounding execution. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence, the stronger the presentation to the court. Legal argument must connect the factual showing to the statutory or case law standards that permit reformation in the jurisdiction where the trust was created or is being administered.
Alternatives to a petition include direct amendment by the settlor if they have capacity, nonjudicial settlement agreements where all interested parties consent, and, in limited circumstances, trust decanting if the trust permits it and state law allows. Mediation can also resolve disputes without court involvement and may produce a settlement that the court will later approve. Each alternative has advantages and limitations, and selecting the right path depends on the trust’s terms, the parties’ willingness to cooperate, and the legal constraints applicable to the requested change.
A modification may require coordinated updates to related estate planning documents to ensure consistency. For instance, a modified trust should align with a pour-over will, beneficiary designations on retirement accounts, powers of attorney, and HIPAA authorizations. Failing to update these instruments can create gaps or conflicts that complicate administration. Part of the modification process typically includes a review of related documents and recommendations for any necessary revisions or administrative steps trustees must take to reflect the new trust terms across all relevant accounts and records.
Costs vary based on complexity, the need for contested hearings, and whether parties cooperate. Reasonable fees include time for document review, drafting petitions and declarations, court filing fees, and representation at hearings. Contested litigation increases costs due to discovery, depositions, and multiple court appearances. Where parties negotiate a nonjudicial agreement, costs are often lower. During the initial consultation we discuss likely costs and develop a strategy aligned with the client’s priorities, seeking efficient pathways when possible to limit expenses while still pursuing a durable resolution.
To begin, gather the original trust documents, any amendments, associated estate planning instruments, and records of the trust’s assets. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to schedule an initial consultation to review the materials and discuss objectives. We will evaluate whether an amendment, nonjudicial agreement, or petition is appropriate and outline the steps involved, including timelines and estimated costs. Early document collection and clear communication among interested parties help accelerate the process and improve the chances of achieving a favorable outcome with minimal disruption to trust administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas