If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Laguna Hills, a trust modification petition may be necessary to reflect new circumstances, correct errors, or address changed family dynamics. The process involves filing specific documents with the appropriate California court and demonstrating the legal basis for the requested modification. Our office assists clients in evaluating the trust language, advising on available statutory and equitable remedies, and preparing pleadings that make a clear case for the court to approve the requested changes while protecting the interests of beneficiaries and trustees under California law.
A trust modification petition can be an effective way to adapt an estate plan without creating an entirely new trust, particularly when the settlor’s intent can still be honored with limited adjustments. These petitions are often used to fix drafting issues, update administrative provisions, correct asset distributions, or respond to changed tax or family situations. Understanding the potential impacts on tax consequences, creditor rights, and beneficiary expectations is important. Our approach focuses on thorough analysis, careful drafting, and clear presentation to the court so the requested modification is legally sound and aligned with the client’s objectives.
Modifying an existing trust through a petition can preserve the original planning framework while accommodating new realities, such as remarriage, additional children, or changes in assets. A properly supported petition helps avoid unintended outcomes, reduce conflicts among beneficiaries, and maintain continuity in trustee administration. It can also resolve ambiguity in trust language, incorporate updated tax considerations, and ensure the settlor’s current wishes are respected. Pursuing a modification petition when appropriate often prevents future litigation, protects estate assets, and provides beneficiaries with clearer guidance on the trust’s intent and administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California from San Jose and provides estate planning services tailored to individual needs, including trust modification petitions. We guide clients through evaluating trust provisions, identifying legal grounds for change, and preparing court filings that address procedural and substantive requirements. Our team emphasizes clear communication, timely action, and practical solutions that protect family relationships and financial interests. Whether the goal is a minor correction or a more significant restructuring of trust terms, we work to achieve outcomes that are legally defensible and reflect the client’s updated intentions.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the superior court to change the terms of a trust document when circumstances make the original terms unsuitable or ambiguous. Under California law, petitions can be based on the settlor’s intent, changed circumstances, mistake, or other equitable grounds. The process requires careful factual support and legal argument to show why modification is warranted. Understanding the distinctions among revocable amendments, court-ordered modifications, and reformation actions helps clients choose the right path to achieve their estate planning goals without compromising legal protections for assets and beneficiaries.
Trust modification may involve different parties including the settlor, trustees, beneficiaries, and sometimes creditors or other interested persons. The court will consider notice to interested parties and any objections they raise. Evidence such as the original trust document, subsequent communications, and factual circumstances that justify alteration are often necessary. We work to assemble the documentation and legal arguments needed, including proposed revised trust language, declarations that explain the reasons for change, and any supporting exhibits. This preparation helps streamline the court process and improves the prospect of a favorable ruling.
A trust modification petition asks a court to alter the terms or administration of an existing trust when the original document no longer produces the intended results or contains errors. Modifications can range from correcting clerical mistakes to addressing significant changes such as beneficiary circumstances or tax law impacts. California statutes and case law allow courts to reform or modify trusts when there is clear and convincing evidence of a mistake or when equitable considerations support a change. Filing a petition requires careful drafting to clearly state the requested relief and the grounds supporting it, along with proper notice to interested parties.
Successful trust modification petitions rely on several elements: a valid trust instrument, demonstrable grounds for modification, documented facts supporting the requested change, and compliance with procedural requirements such as notice and filing rules. The process typically begins with a review of the trust and related documents, followed by drafting pleadings and proposed modified trust provisions. Notice must be given to trustees and beneficiaries, and the court may require hearings or additional evidence. Anticipating potential objections and preparing persuasive declarations and exhibits helps present a coherent case to the judge.
Understanding common terms helps navigate the trust modification process. Definitions clarify roles, legal standards, and procedural concepts such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, redecoration, and notice. Familiarity with these terms allows clients to better understand petitions, court orders, and the likely outcomes of different modification strategies. Accurate use of terminology in filings and communications also reduces misunderstandings and supports a clear presentation to the court, which can be decisive in obtaining the requested changes while protecting the legal rights of all involved parties.
The settlor is the person who created and funded the trust, establishing its terms and distributing assets into the trust. In many trust modification matters, the settlor’s current intent and circumstances are central to the court’s decision. If the settlor is alive and retains certain powers, some modifications may be accomplished through amendment rather than court petition. When the settlor is unavailable, the court evaluates evidence of original intent and changed conditions to determine whether reformation or modification is appropriate in order to give effect to what the settlor intended.
Reformation is a legal remedy that allows the court to correct a trust when the written document does not accurately reflect the settlor’s actual intent due to mistake or miscommunication. To obtain reformation, the petitioner must present clear evidence showing the discrepancy between the settlor’s intent and the trust language. Reformation can address drafting errors and ambiguous language so the trust operates as the settlor intended. This remedy focuses on aligning the written terms with proven intent while preserving the original structure of the trust.
A trustee is the individual or entity charged with administering the trust assets in accordance with the trust document and applicable law. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including duties of loyalty and prudence. When a trust modification petition is filed, trustees often play a central role: they may implement changes, contest proposed modifications, or help provide factual background. Trustees must balance their obligations to follow trust terms with practical concerns about administration and potential court rulings that alter fiduciary responsibilities or distribution instructions.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits or distributions from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have rights to notice and may object to proposed modifications that could negatively affect their interests. Courts consider beneficiary rights when evaluating petitions, weighing evidence of settlor intent and the fairness of proposed changes. Advance planning and clear communication with beneficiaries can mitigate disputes and streamline court approval, helping ensure that changes achieve the settlor’s goals while maintaining beneficiary protections and avoiding unnecessary litigation.
There are multiple paths to change a trust, and choosing the right one depends on the facts. Simple, permitted changes may be made through an amendment if the settlor is alive and retains amendment power. Reformation addresses mistakes in the trust’s expression of intent when evidence supports correction. A trust modification petition is appropriate when court approval is needed to address more complex issues, disagreements, or when statutory authorization is required. Evaluating each option helps clients pursue the most efficient and effective route to align the trust with current objectives and legal requirements.
When a trust contains simple clerical errors, incorrect names, or minor drafting defects that do not change fundamental distribution directions, a targeted correction can resolve the issue without a full court adjudication. If the settlor is available and the trust permits amendments, these straightforward adjustments can be implemented through careful documentation and follow-up to ensure trustees and beneficiaries understand the change. Correcting these matters proactively reduces the risk of confusion during administration and helps maintain the continuity of the trust’s operation for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
Sometimes the need is limited to updating administrative provisions such as trustee succession procedures, distribution timing, or trustee powers. These adjustments may be achievable through amendment or agreed modification when parties are cooperative. Making administrative updates can improve trust management, clarify authority for trustees, and ensure distributions occur smoothly. Even when changes are administrative, proper documentation and communication with interested parties are important to avoid misunderstandings or challenges during later trust administration.
A comprehensive petition is often necessary when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about the meaning of trust provisions, when substantial assets are affected, or when changes could materially alter beneficiary rights. In these situations, court involvement helps provide a binding resolution that protects all parties and clarifies future administration. Preparing a thorough petition with supporting declarations and evidence is important to address likely objections and demonstrate why the proposed modifications are appropriate under the circumstances and consistent with the settlor’s intent.
When proposed trust changes involve complex tax considerations, creditor claims, or impacts on public benefits, a court-supervised petition helps ensure changes are legally sound and do not create unintended liabilities. Court approval can provide clarity for trustees and beneficiaries regarding tax treatment, asset distribution, and creditor rights. Addressing these complexities requires careful legal analysis and documentation to present the court with a comprehensive view of consequences and benefits, minimizing the risk of future disputes or adverse tax outcomes.
Pursuing a comprehensive, court-approved modification protects the integrity of the estate plan by creating a clear, enforceable record of changes. Court orders reduce ambiguity for trustees and beneficiaries, lower the likelihood of later challenges, and can resolve contentious issues in a single proceeding. This approach can also address multiple interrelated issues at once, such as correcting mistakes while updating administrative provisions, thereby saving time and reducing overall legal uncertainty. The outcome provides a durable solution that trustees can rely upon in future administration.
A comprehensive approach allows for careful evaluation of tax, creditor, and beneficiary implications before finalizing changes, which helps protect estate assets and beneficiaries’ interests. Court involvement provides a neutral forum to balance competing claims and ensures legal standards are met when modifying trust terms. By thoroughly documenting the reasons for change and obtaining a judicial ruling, trustees gain confidence in implementing amendments, which promotes smoother administration and preserves family relationships by reducing ongoing disputes over the trust’s meaning or effect.
One key benefit of a court-approved modification is the clarity it provides: the resulting order becomes part of the official record and reduces future disagreements about interpretation. Legal finality protects trustees when making distributions and ensures beneficiaries understand their rights and expectations. This formal resolution is especially valuable when the trust governs significant assets or complex distributions. By securing a court order, parties gain confidence that subsequent administration will proceed on a firm legal footing, minimizing uncertainty and the risk of further litigation.
Obtaining judicial approval for modifications helps protect trustees against allegations of fiduciary breach and provides beneficiaries with assurance that changes were reviewed under legal standards. The process ensures that notice requirements are observed and that interested parties have an opportunity to be heard, which strengthens the legitimacy of the outcome. This balanced approach reduces future contention and provides a clear framework for administering the trust in accordance with updated terms and the court’s directives, supporting transparency and fairness for all involved.
Before filing a petition, assemble clear, dated documentation that explains why the trust term should be changed, including correspondence, financial records, and any contemporaneous notes of the settlor’s intent. Demonstrating objective evidence of changed circumstances or drafting mistakes strengthens the petition and helps the court understand the necessity of modification. Detailed records also assist in addressing potential objections from beneficiaries or creditors. A well-documented factual record makes it easier to propose precise revised language and to show that the modification serves the settlor’s true wishes while minimizing conflicts.
Evaluate the potential tax consequences and effects on public benefits before seeking a modification, particularly for trusts holding retirement accounts, life insurance, or assets tied to government benefits. Certain changes can trigger unexpected tax liabilities or affect eligibility for benefits. Consult with tax or benefits advisors where appropriate and present the court with analysis of these implications so the judge can weigh the broader consequences. Proper planning reduces the likelihood of creating financial issues for beneficiaries and helps ensure the modification achieves the intended practical and fiscal outcomes.
There are several reasons to consider a trust modification petition, including correcting errors in the document, addressing unanticipated changes in family circumstances, or aligning trust administration with current law and tax rules. A petition can also be used to clarify ambiguous language that has resulted in conflicting interpretations among beneficiaries or trustees. By requesting judicial confirmation of changes, you gain a defensible path to update the trust while minimizing future disputes. Evaluating the specific facts and desired outcomes helps determine whether a petition is the most suitable solution.
Other common reasons include handling newly acquired assets, adjusting distributions for changed financial needs, and updating trustee powers and succession plans. Sometimes changes are needed to address creditor claims or to respond to marriage, divorce, birth, or death events that alter the settlor’s intentions. A petition provides a formal mechanism for the court to adjudicate contested issues and grant modifications tailored to the settlor’s current wishes. Thoughtful analysis of the effects of modification, including tax and inheritance consequences, is essential before proceeding.
Common circumstances prompting a petition include ambiguous trust provisions that yield conflicting interpretations, trust language that contains drafting errors, or changes in family structure such as remarriage, divorce, or the birth of a new child. Other triggers include significant changes in assets, tax law developments, or the need to correct administrative procedures to ensure effective trustee management. Recognizing these circumstances early and addressing them through a measured legal process can protect beneficiaries and preserve the settlor’s intended distribution plan.
Ambiguities in trust language can create disputes over how assets should be distributed or how trustee powers should be exercised. When terms are unclear, beneficiaries and trustees may interpret provisions differently, which can disrupt trust administration and lead to litigation. A trust modification petition seeks to resolve such ambiguities by presenting evidence of the settlor’s actual intent or by asking the court to select an interpretation that best furthers the trust’s purpose. Resolving ambiguities through the court helps ensure consistent administration going forward.
Significant life events like marriage, divorce, births, or deaths may necessitate changes in a trust to reflect altered relationships or financial realities. Similarly, substantial changes in asset composition or tax positions can make existing provisions unworkable. A carefully prepared petition allows the court to consider updated circumstances and approve modifications that maintain the settlor’s intent while adapting to present needs. Addressing these shifts promptly helps avoid unintended consequences and protects the long-term functioning of the estate plan.
Occasionally, trusts contain drafting errors or omissions that prevent proper administration or contradict the settlor’s intentions. Whether due to oversight or changes that occurred after drafting, these defects can hinder distributions or create uncertainty. A petition to reform the trust or otherwise modify its terms can correct such mistakes when supported by credible evidence of the original intent. This remedy preserves the settlor’s plan to the extent possible while remedying issues that would otherwise impede the trust’s operation.
We provide dedicated assistance for clients in Laguna Hills seeking trust modifications, helping evaluate whether amendments, reformation, or a court petition is the right path. Our team reviews trust documents and related records, advises on legal options, drafts necessary pleadings, and coordinates notice to interested parties. We aim to make the process as efficient as possible while protecting your interests and minimizing disputes. Whether the need is corrective or driven by significant changes in circumstances, we support clients through each step of the petition process with practical legal guidance.
Our office blends a strong foundation in California estate planning law with practical experience handling trust modifications and related court matters. We emphasize careful analysis of trust language, thorough documentation of facts, and clear presentation to the court to support requested changes. Clients receive individualized counsel tailored to their family and financial situation, including guidance on notice requirements, potential objections, and likely outcomes. This thorough approach helps ensure proposed modifications are legally sound and aligned with the settlor’s present intentions and goals.
We assist clients in evaluating alternative paths such as amendments when the settlor is available, reformation for correcting mistakes, and court petitions for more contested or complex matters. Our team prepares proposed modified language, supporting declarations, and exhibits to present a persuasive case. We coordinate with trustees and beneficiaries as appropriate to explore resolution before litigation and to limit costs where possible. Our goal is to achieve durable, practical results that protect both assets and relationships among beneficiaries.
Clients benefit from clear communication about timing, procedural steps, and potential impacts including tax and creditor considerations. We provide pragmatic counsel to help clients weigh the costs and benefits of each option and to select an approach that meets legal requirements while preserving estate planning objectives. Whether handling straightforward corrections or managing contested petitions, we aim to produce outcomes that are understandable, enforceable, and respectful of family dynamics and legal obligations.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the existing trust and related documents to identify grounds for modification and to determine the most efficient legal route. We gather supporting evidence, draft petitions and proposed modified trust provisions, and ensure proper notice to interested parties. If disputes arise, we prepare declarations and exhibits to support the petition and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we communicate timelines and potential outcomes so clients understand each stage of the legal process and can make informed decisions about proceeding.
The initial review focuses on understanding the trust’s terms, the settlor’s intent, and the specific reasons for seeking modification. We assess whether the settlor can amend the trust directly or whether court intervention is required. This stage includes collecting documents, identifying interested parties, and outlining legal grounds such as mistake, changed circumstances, or ambiguity. Based on this review, we propose a strategy tailored to the client’s objectives, considering the likely timeline, notice requirements, and potential responses from beneficiaries or trustees.
We review the trust instrument, related estate planning documents like wills and powers of attorney, and any correspondence or records that shed light on the settlor’s intent or the events prompting modification. Gathering affidavits, financial statements, and witness accounts may be necessary to support a petition. This factual investigation is critical for demonstrating the rationale for change and helps shape the proposed revised language to avoid future disputes and ensure the court has a complete factual record.
After gathering facts, we evaluate applicable statutes and case law to determine the strongest legal basis for modification, whether reformation to correct a mistake or a petition based on changed circumstances. We then outline a strategy that addresses likely objections, notice obligations, and timing considerations. This includes drafting proposed modified provisions and planning for possible settlement discussions with interested parties to narrow issues or achieve voluntary agreement when feasible.
Once the strategy is set, we prepare the petition and required supporting documents including declarations, proposed orders, and the revised trust language. We ensure compliance with local court rules and statutory notice procedures so the filing proceeds without procedural defects. This stage involves coordinating with the client to finalize documents, serving notice to trustees and beneficiaries, and filing the petition with the appropriate California superior court. Thorough preparation here reduces the likelihood of delays and strengthens the presentation to the judge.
Supporting declarations explain the underlying facts and provide documentary evidence such as correspondence, financial records, or witness statements that justify the requested modification. Exhibits are organized to present a clear narrative and to help the court understand both the original trust language and the reasons for change. Clear, well-supported declarations and exhibits are often decisive in persuading a court that modification is warranted and should be included in any proposed order granting relief.
Proper service of notice to trustees, beneficiaries, and any other interested parties is required by law and by court rules. We prepare and execute service documents, file proof of service, and address any procedural requirements for hearing dates or interim orders. Ensuring accurate and timely notice prevents delays and potential challenges to the petition’s validity. Clear communication with all interested parties at this stage can also lead to agreements that narrow contested issues before a hearing.
If objections are raised, the court may schedule a hearing to evaluate the facts and legal arguments. We represent clients at hearings, presenting declarations, witness testimony if appropriate, and legal briefing to support the requested modification. The court will weigh evidence, consider objections, and make a ruling. Many matters are resolved through negotiated agreements prior to hearing, while others require a final order. Our goal is to secure a resolution that implements the settlor’s intent and provides durable guidance for trust administration.
Before and during the hearing process we explore opportunities to resolve disputes through negotiation, mediation, or limited agreement among interested parties. Reaching a settlement can reduce costs and preserve family relationships while still achieving meaningful modifications. When settlement is possible, we draft agreed orders that reflect the parties’ resolution and present them to the court for approval, providing a faster path to enforceable changes than contested litigation.
If the matter proceeds to a contested hearing, we present the legal arguments and factual record to the judge and respond to opposing positions. The court will issue an order resolving the petition, which may reform the trust, grant specified modifications, or deny relief depending on the evidence. A final order creates a clear legal basis for trustees to act and beneficiaries to expect distributions under the modified terms, providing certainty for future administration and reducing the likelihood of subsequent disputes.
A trust modification petition is a formal court request to change the terms or administration of an existing trust when informal amendment is not possible or when legal grounds such as mistake, changed circumstances, or ambiguity justify court intervention. Petitions are used to correct drafting errors, adapt trust provisions to changed family or financial situations, or obtain judicial authority for changes that affect beneficiaries and trustees. The petition sets out the proposed modifications, the factual and legal reasons for the change, and asks the superior court to enter an order reflecting the revised terms. The court evaluates the petition along with any objections, declarations, and exhibits to determine whether modification is appropriate. Notice to interested parties is required so beneficiaries and trustees can participate or object. If the court is persuaded by the evidence and legal argument, it may grant the petition and issue an order that becomes part of the official record, enabling trustees to administer the trust under the modified terms with clarity and legal protection.
When the settlor is alive and retains the power to amend or revoke the trust, many updates can be handled through a direct amendment rather than a court petition. Amendments are typically faster and less costly because they do not require court involvement, provided the trust instrument permits such changes and the settlor has capacity to sign the amendment. Proper execution and recordkeeping are important to ensure the amendment is effective and later recognized by trustees and third parties who rely on the trust document. However, if the settlor is unavailable, incapacitated, or the change involves correcting a mistake or resolving a dispute among beneficiaries, court action may be necessary. In those cases, a petition seeks judicial approval to modify or reform the trust to reflect the settlor’s intent or to address circumstances that prevent straightforward amendment, ensuring the change is enforceable and addresses the interests of all affected parties.
To reform a trust for a drafting mistake, the petitioner must present credible evidence showing that the written trust fails to reflect the settlor’s actual intent. This evidence can include prior drafts, correspondence, witness testimony, notations, or other contemporaneous documents indicating the settlor’s intentions. Declarations from persons familiar with the settlor’s wishes and the drafting process are often important to establish the discrepancy between intent and the written instrument. The court looks for clear and convincing proof of the mistake and the correction requested. Strong documentary support and consistent witness statements make a persuasive case for reformation. When the evidence demonstrates that the trust language deviates from what the settlor intended, the court may reform the document to align it with proven intent while preserving the trust’s overall structure and purpose.
Notice procedures vary depending on the type of petition and local rules, but generally trustees and beneficiaries must be given formal notice of the petition to modify a trust. This often requires serving the petition and any supporting documents by mail or personal service and filing proof of service with the court. Notice gives interested parties an opportunity to review the proposed changes, ask questions, or file objections within the timeframe set by law or court rules. In some cases, more extensive notice may be required, including notice to other persons with potential claims. Properly documenting notice and following procedural requirements is essential to prevent delays or challenges to the petition. Counsel coordinates service and ensures proof of notice is filed so the court can proceed to consider the petition on its merits.
Modifying a trust can have tax consequences depending on the nature of the change and the types of assets involved. Changes that affect ownership, beneficiary designations for retirement accounts, or the character of estate assets may influence income tax, gift tax, or estate tax considerations. Trust modifications that alter distribution timing or shift assets between taxable and tax-advantaged structures may trigger unintended liabilities if not carefully planned. Evaluating tax implications before proposing modifications helps avoid surprises and ensures the court and trustees are aware of potential fiscal impacts. Where tax consequences are likely, consulting with tax counsel or incorporating tax analysis into the petition can help the court understand the full ramifications and choose a path that protects the financial interests of the estate and beneficiaries.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on case complexity, notice requirements, and whether objections arise. Simple petitions with no objections may be resolved in a matter of weeks to months, while contested matters that require hearings, discovery, or extensive briefing can take longer. Local court calendars, the need for additional evidence, and scheduling of hearings all affect duration. Early preparation of supporting documentation and attention to procedural details helps minimize delays and move the petition toward resolution more efficiently. If parties reach a voluntary agreement, the process can be significantly faster because agreed orders can be presented to the court for approval without a contested hearing. When disputes persist, the court may schedule multiple hearings, requiring more time for resolution. Counsel will provide an estimate of expected timelines based on the specifics of the case and local court practices to help clients plan accordingly.
Yes. When a court issues an order approving modifications, trustees who follow that order are generally protected from liability for actions taken in accordance with the court’s directive. A judicial order provides clear authority for trustees to administer trust assets and carry out distributions under the modified terms, reducing the risk of later claims for breach of fiduciary duty. Ensuring the order is properly drafted and broad enough to address the necessary administrative steps is important for trustee protection. Counsel works to secure orders that expressly authorize trustees to act and to resolve ambiguities that could invite future disputes. When trustees comply with the court-approved modifications and follow required reporting or accounting practices, they gain significant confidence that their administration aligns with judicial guidance and minimizes exposure to later claims from beneficiaries.
If beneficiaries object to proposed changes, the court will consider their objections along with the petitioner’s supporting evidence and legal arguments. Objections may lead to negotiation, mediation, or a contested hearing where each side presents declarations, documents, and legal authorities. The judge evaluates whether the requested modification is supported by evidence of the settlor’s intent or by other lawful grounds such as changed circumstances or mistake. Resolving objections often involves clarifying factual issues and demonstrating why the modification serves the trust’s purpose without unfairly harming beneficiary interests. Counsel may seek compromise solutions or present a full evidentiary showing to persuade the court. The final decision rests with the judge, who balances the legal standards and the equities presented by both sides.
Alternatives to filing a petition include executing a direct amendment if the settlor is available and retains amendment powers, negotiating an agreed modification among beneficiaries and trustees, or pursuing mediation to resolve disputes. Agreed solutions can be faster and less costly and may preserve family relationships. When parties reach an agreement, they can present an agreed order to the court for approval, which streamlines the process and reduces the need for contested litigation. However, when the settlor is unavailable, when there is a drafting error needing reformation, or when parties cannot reach consensus, a court petition may be the most reliable route to obtain a binding resolution. Assessing the pros and cons of each approach helps determine the most appropriate path for the particular circumstances at hand.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary widely depending on the complexity of the case, whether interested parties object, and the amount of preparation and court time required. Simple petitions with little opposition may incur modest legal fees and standard court filing costs, while contested matters that require declarations, discovery, and hearings can be more expensive. Local filing fees and costs for serving notice are additional items to consider in the overall expense. We discuss fee structures, estimated costs, and potential alternatives during the initial consultation so clients can make informed decisions. Exploring options to resolve issues by agreement or through limited discovery can sometimes reduce costs compared to full contested litigation, while still achieving meaningful and enforceable modifications to the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas