A Heggstad petition helps resolve situations where property intended to pass to a trust remains in a deceased person’s name, creating obstacles to transfer. Residents of Las Flores often encounter this issue when titles, bank accounts, or real property were not retitled before incapacity or death. This page explains what a Heggstad petition is, why it may be needed, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist you in navigating California procedures. We focus on clear communication, protecting your family’s interests, and pursuing the legal relief needed to transfer assets into the trust efficiently and lawfully.
Many families delay trust administration steps because retitling assets can be confusing and time consuming. When trust property remains in an individual’s name after death, beneficiaries may face delays in access to assets, difficulties with financial institutions, and potential disputes. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that specific property was intended to belong to the trust despite formal title remaining in the decedent’s name. That judicial declaration can clear title, allow distributions according to the trust, and prevent unnecessary probate. We explain the petition process, typical evidence used, and realistic timelines for resolving these disputes in Orange County and Las Flores.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be essential when assets meant for trust administration remain titled in the decedent’s name, as it creates a judicial record aligning legal title with the trust’s intent. The declaration helps banks, county recorders, and other parties accept trust-directed distributions without resorting to full probate. This reduces delay and can preserve estate value by avoiding extended administration expenses. For families in Las Flores, a successful petition clarifies legal ownership, prevents disputes among heirs, and facilitates efficient asset transfer according to the trust’s terms, protecting beneficiaries and ensuring the decedent’s wishes are followed.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide estate planning and trust administration services for individuals and families across California. Our team assists with a broad range of trust-related matters including Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, and ancillary filings needed to transfer assets into a trust. We are committed to practical legal solutions, thorough documentation, and client-centered communication. Whether you are in San Jose, Las Flores, or elsewhere in the state, we guide clients through the procedural steps and evidentiary requirements necessary to secure court recognition of trust ownership and resolve title disputes efficiently and respectfully.
A Heggstad petition is a court action that seeks a declaration that certain property was held in trust, even though formal title remained in the decedent’s name. This petition relies on evidence such as the trust agreement, intent shown by the decedent’s estate planning documents, beneficiary designations, bank records, and other contemporaneous actions demonstrating trust ownership. The petition can be used for real property, bank accounts, or other titled assets when transfer at death was intended to occur outside probate. Understanding the types of evidence typically accepted and the procedural path helps families prepare their documentation and approach the process with realistic expectations.
The Heggstad petition proceeds through the probate court and requires a clear presentation of why property should be treated as trust property. The court evaluates whether the decedent intended the asset to be controlled by the trust and whether steps were taken to effectuate that intention. In many cases, the petition results in an order allowing the trustee to take title and distribute assets consistent with the trust terms. Timely action and accurate documentation reduce the risk of delays and disputes, and help beneficiaries access trust assets when needed by aligning legal title with the trust instrument.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that specific assets belong to a trust despite being titled in an individual’s name at the time of death. The petition shows the court that the decedent created a trust with the intent for those assets to be governed by the trust, and that circumstances prevented formal retitling. Evidence often includes the trust document, related estate planning paperwork, correspondence with financial institutions, and testimony or declarations from persons familiar with the decedent’s intent. The court’s order clarifies ownership, allowing the trustee to manage and distribute the property according to the trust.
Key elements of a Heggstad petition include establishing the trust’s terms, proving the decedent’s intent to transfer the asset to the trust, and presenting documentary and testimonial evidence showing the asset was meant to be trust property. The process often begins with gathering records and preparing a petition for the probate court, followed by serving interested parties, filing supporting declarations, and attending hearings if contested. The court may issue an order declaring ownership in the trust, which can then be recorded or used to persuade banks and other institutions to recognize the trustee’s authority to distribute or manage the asset.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petitions helps clients follow the process and know what documentation to assemble. Important terms include trust, trustee, beneficiary, probate, decedent, and recordable instruments. Each term has practical significance when preparing a petition and supporting evidence. For example, the trustee is the person or entity authorized to manage trust assets, while probate refers to the court-supervised process for distributing assets outside of trusts. Familiarity with these terms helps reduce confusion when dealing with court filings and communications with financial institutions during trust administration.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which one or more people (settlors) place assets under the control of a trustee to be managed for the benefit of designated beneficiaries. Trusts often outline how assets are to be held, invested, and distributed at specific times or under certain conditions. A living trust created during life permits property to pass outside probate when properly funded, while testamentary trusts are created by will and take effect after death. For a Heggstad petition, the trust document and related evidence are central to proving that particular property was intended to be trust property.
Probate is the court-supervised process for proving a decedent’s will, appointing an executor or administrator, and overseeing the distribution of assets under a will. Probate can be time consuming and costly, which is why many people use trusts to transfer assets outside probate. A Heggstad petition serves as an alternative pathway to resolve specific title issues without initiating full probate when the asset was meant to be controlled by a trust. The petition seeks a judicial declaration to align legal title with the trust’s intent so that probate can be avoided for those assets.
A trustee is the person or institution named in a trust to hold and manage trust assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries. The trustee has a fiduciary duty to follow the trust’s terms, act prudently in asset management, and distribute property according to instructions. After a settlor’s death, the successor trustee steps in to administer the trust. When property remains titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition may be needed to confirm the trustee’s authority to take title and carry out distributions consistent with the trust instrument.
A Heggstad petition is a specific court filing used in California to request that the probate court recognize that certain property was intended to be part of a trust even though title was not transferred before death. Named after a California case that established this remedy, the petition requires evidence of the decedent’s intent and any steps taken to fund the trust. A favorable ruling enables the trustee to obtain title or authority to manage the asset, providing a practical means to align formal ownership with the trust’s terms and avoid unnecessary probate for those assets.
When assets remain in a decedent’s name, families can consider several paths including initiating probate, pursuing a Heggstad petition, or negotiating directly with institutions to clear title. Probate can resolve title issues but often involves greater delay and expense. A Heggstad petition targets specific assets and can be quicker when evidence is strong. Direct negotiation with banks or the county recorder may work in straightforward cases but can fail when institutions require judicial confirmation. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each route helps families choose the approach most likely to secure timely transfers and protect estate value.
A limited approach is often sufficient when the trust document and contemporaneous records clearly show that the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust and the title omission resulted from oversight. Examples include bank statements naming the trust, correspondence with financial institutions, or notarized documents indicating intent. When such evidence is strong, a focused Heggstad petition or direct submission of documents to an institution may lead to recognition of trust ownership without a lengthy contested process. Timely preparation of records and declarations strengthens this targeted path.
A limited approach works best when beneficiaries and interested parties are in agreement about the trust’s terms and the intended transfer. If heirs accept the trust’s disposition and there are no competing claims, a petition or cooperative negotiation often proceeds smoothly. This collaborative environment reduces the need for contested litigation and helps expedite court approval or institutional acceptance. Clear communication among family members and early documentation of consensus can prevent misunderstandings and enable efficient administration of the trust property.
Comprehensive legal services are warranted when ownership of property is disputed, when multiple entities claim rights, or when title issues involve complicated chains of ownership. In such cases, resolving the matter may require formal litigation, forensic review of records, and coordination with title companies, banks, and county recorders. A thorough legal approach includes preparing robust evidentiary filings, anticipating likely defenses, and representing the trustee’s interests in contested hearings to protect beneficiaries and preserve estate assets under the trust’s terms.
When the estate includes various asset types such as real estate, retirement accounts, and out-of-state property, or when matters involve multiple jurisdictions, a comprehensive strategy is often necessary. Coordinating filings, ensuring compliance with differing recording rules, and managing creditor or tax implications require careful planning. A broad legal approach addresses these layered challenges by assembling necessary documentation, coordinating with local counsel where appropriate, and crafting petitions and motions that achieve clear title across all affected assets while protecting beneficiary interests and minimizing delay.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust title problems reduces the likelihood of future disputes and ensures that court orders are durable and enforceable. By preparing detailed evidence, addressing potential competing claims, and coordinating with institutions in advance, trustees can secure clear title and facilitate efficient distribution. This reduces administrative burdens for beneficiaries and protects estate assets from unnecessary erosion. For residents of Las Flores, taking a careful, document-driven path minimizes surprises and helps ensure that the trust’s terms are honored when transferring property to beneficiaries.
Another benefit of a comprehensive strategy is that it creates a clear record that supports later transactions, such as sales or refinancing of real property. When the court confirms trust ownership through a Heggstad order, title companies and lenders are more likely to accept the trustee’s authority without requiring additional litigation. This smoother transition enhances marketability of real estate and provides beneficiaries with more certainty. Investing time to build a strong legal record often pays dividends by preventing further court action and enabling practical estate settlements.
By thoroughly documenting the trust’s terms and the decedent’s intent, a comprehensive approach diminishes the chance that alternative claimants will successfully challenge ownership later. Robust evidence and formal court recognition create a durable record that supports trustee authority and beneficiary rights. This proactive step protects estate assets from erosion by contested claims and helps ensure that distributions proceed according to plan, reducing long-term costs and uncertainty for families managing sensitive post-death transitions.
Although assembling documentation may take time up front, a complete approach often leads to quicker asset access overall because financial institutions and title companies will be more comfortable accepting a court order that aligns title with the trust. Rather than reopening issues later, trustees can rely on the judicial declaration to proceed with distributions, sales, or transfers. For beneficiaries in need of timely access to funds or property, this clarity reduces friction and helps families move forward with fewer administrative delays.
Start assembling trust documents, title records, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence with financial institutions as soon as possible. Early collection of these materials shortens the time needed to prepare a petition and helps identify gaps that may require additional investigation. Record the chain of events showing intent to fund the trust, such as signed trust documents or evidence of trustee appointments. Timely organization reduces stress for trustees and beneficiaries, and allows legal counsel to evaluate the strength of a petition and recommend the best path forward for resolving title issues.
When preparing a petition, collect supportive declarations from those who can attest to the decedent’s intent, such as family members, advisors, or former attorneys. Also review possible defenses like claims of competing ownership or creditor issues, and gather documentation to address them proactively. Anticipating likely objections and addressing them in the initial filing increases the chance of a favorable outcome and reduces the need for costly follow-up litigation. A well-supported petition presents a persuasive narrative showing why the asset belongs to the trust.
Consider filing a Heggstad petition when assets clearly intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name and institutions refuse to transfer ownership without a court order. Other indications include delays in distributions to beneficiaries, conflicting records about ownership, or when a transfer would otherwise require expensive probate. If the trust was prepared to avoid probate but administrative steps were not completed before death, a Heggstad petition can align legal title with the trust’s expressed intent, helping families access property and carry out distributions without the time and expense of full probate proceedings.
You should also consider this service when an estate involves real property that must be sold or refinanced but cannot proceed because title remains in the decedent’s name. Lenders and title companies frequently require clear title, and a court declaration that the property belongs to the trust can remove barriers to these transactions. Additionally, if there is potential for disagreement among heirs, early action clarifying ownership reduces the chance of contested litigation and provides a formal basis for trustee actions, supporting smoother administration of the estate.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include recently created trusts with assets still in the settlor’s name, real estate purchased in the decedent’s name even though a trust existed, bank or brokerage accounts not retitled, and situations where beneficiary designations are ambiguous or incomplete. Life changes, oversight, or delays in retitling often create these gaps. When institutions decline to accept trust documentation alone, and probate is undesirable or unnecessary for the specific assets, a Heggstad petition provides a courtroom mechanism to reconcile title with the trust’s stated intentions.
A frequent scenario involves a trust created but assets were never retitled into that trust before the settlor’s death or incapacity. This can happen because of procrastination, confusion about the retitling process, or reliance on beneficiaries to complete transfers later. When this occurs, banks and recorders may require court action to accept trustee authority. A Heggstad petition helps by establishing that, despite the absence of formal title changes, the asset was intended to be governed by the trust and should be treated accordingly for distribution purposes.
Sometimes property acquired shortly before death or during estate planning efforts is titled in the individual’s name rather than the trust. This situation can arise when a transaction closes quickly or the trust details are still being finalized. Even when a trust clearly exists, the formal record shows individual ownership. A Heggstad petition presents evidence to demonstrate that the settlor intended the asset to be trust property, enabling the trustee to assume control, record new deeds where appropriate, and proceed with trust administration without converting the matter into full probate proceedings.
Financial institutions, title companies, and county recorders may refuse to transfer assets to a trustee based solely on submitted trust documents, particularly when the asset’s title issues are complex or institutional policies are strict. In such cases, a Heggstad petition can provide the necessary judicial backing for institutions to accept a trustee’s request. The petition clarifies legal ownership and resolves institutional hesitancy, allowing the trustee to complete transactions, distribute assets, or record deeds under the trust’s authority.
If you face a title issue involving trust property in Las Flores, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide practical legal guidance to evaluate options, prepare petitions, and coordinate with institutions. Our goal is to help trustees and beneficiaries obtain clear title and carry out distributions according to the trust. We prioritize responsive communication and careful document preparation to reduce delays and uncertainty. Contact us to discuss the specifics of your matter, what evidence will be most persuasive, and realistic timelines for resolving the issue through a Heggstad petition or alternative methods.
The firm focuses on providing practical legal solutions tailored to trust administration and estate settlement needs. We assist clients by reviewing trust documents, gathering supporting evidence, drafting petitions that clearly present the decedent’s intent, and navigating court procedures. Our approach emphasizes thorough preparation and clear communication so trustees understand the likely path forward and what steps are required. That preparation often leads to smoother proceedings, quicker acceptance by institutions, and reduced chances of later disputes, benefiting trustees and beneficiaries alike.
When approaching a Heggstad petition, we work to assemble the strongest possible record by identifying and preserving relevant documents, preparing supportive declarations, and anticipating potential objections. We coordinate with title companies, banks, and county recorders where appropriate, and we advise on supplementary actions such as recording court orders or preparing corrective deeds. This methodical preparation helps minimize delays and ensures that fiduciary obligations are met as trust property is transferred and distributed according to the settlor’s intentions.
We treat each client matter with discretion and respect, recognizing that trust administration often involves sensitive family dynamics and complex financial arrangements. Our goal is to reduce stress by providing clear steps and realistic timelines, keeping trustees informed at every stage. Whether the situation calls for a targeted petition or a wider legal strategy, we help clients weigh options and select the most appropriate approach to secure title and protect beneficiary interests throughout the administration process.
Our process begins with an initial evaluation of the trust documents and asset records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then advise on evidence to collect, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and handle service of process and filing with the probate court. If needed, we represent the trustee in hearings and communications with institutions. Throughout, we focus on documenting intent and creating a clear record that secures recognition of trust ownership, helping prevent future disputes and enabling efficient administration of the trust assets.
In the first phase, we review the trust, wills, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence relevant to ownership to determine whether a petition is warranted. We identify missing items and advise on how to obtain them, such as requesting account histories or declarations from witnesses. This stage is critical to building a persuasive petition because courts rely heavily on contemporaneous documentary evidence and clear narratives demonstrating how the decedent intended assets to be held in trust.
We carefully examine the trust instrument and related estate planning documents to confirm the trust’s terms and the settlor’s intent regarding particular assets. This review includes scrutiny of deeds, titles, account records, and beneficiary forms. Identifying inconsistencies or gaps early allows us to plan how to address them in the petition and what supplemental declarations or evidence will be needed. A detailed document review provides the foundation for an effective legal strategy to resolve title issues without unnecessary delay.
After reviewing the core documents, we assist in collecting supporting evidence such as account statements, closing escrows, and written communications showing intent to fund the trust. Where appropriate, we prepare declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s wishes and actions. These declarations, combined with documentary proof, create a persuasive record showing that the asset was meant to be owned by the trust and justify the court’s recognition of trust ownership.
Once evidence is assembled, we draft the Heggstad petition and supporting papers tailored to the asset type and the court’s requirements. The filing includes detailed declarations, exhibits, and any proposed orders necessary to effectuate the transfer or recognition of title. We ensure all procedural requirements are met for filing and service on interested parties. Careful drafting anticipates likely questions from the court and helps present a clear, persuasive case for recognition of trust ownership.
Drafting focuses on a coherent narrative supported by documentary evidence and witness declarations. Exhibits such as trust excerpts, deeds, bank records, and correspondence are attached to demonstrate intent and actions taken by the decedent. The petition lays out the legal basis for a judicial declaration and requests specific relief, such as an order vesting title in the trustee, authorization to record deeds, or permission to manage the asset under the trust’s terms.
After finalizing the petition, we file it with the appropriate probate court and serve all required parties. Service may include beneficiaries, heirs, and any known creditors or claimants. Proper service ensures the court has jurisdiction and that interested persons have an opportunity to respond. We monitor the filing process, address any procedural questions the court raises, and prepare for hearings if opposition arises, ensuring the trustee’s position is presented effectively throughout the proceedings.
Once the petition is filed and served, the court may issue tentative rulings, schedule hearings, or grant relief on written submissions depending on the circumstances. We attend hearings as needed to present evidence and respond to objections, working to secure a clear order recognizing trust ownership. After obtaining the court’s order, we assist with post-decree steps such as recording the order with the county recorder, notifying institutions, and taking actions necessary to transfer or manage the asset in accordance with the trust.
During court proceedings, it may be necessary to present oral argument or additional declarations to address any objections raised by interested parties. We prepare witnesses and organize exhibits to demonstrate a consistent and compelling record of the decedent’s intent. Addressing potential challenges early in the hearing process increases the likelihood of a decisive order and limits opportunities for renewed disputes, enabling the trustee to proceed with trust administration once the court issues its ruling.
After the court enters an order, we guide trustees through practical implementation steps such as recording the order, delivering a certified copy to financial institutions, and arranging for corrective deeds if needed. We also advise on related tasks such as distributing assets, paying valid creditors, and completing any additional filings required to close the trust administration. This post-decree assistance ensures the court’s decision translates into effective control and distribution of the trust property.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing in California probate court seeking a declaration that specified assets were intended to be held in a trust even though title remains in the decedent’s name. This remedy is used when documentary evidence and surrounding circumstances indicate the settlor meant to fund the trust but formal retitling was overlooked or incomplete. The petition presents evidence to demonstrate intent and asks the court to vest title in the trustee so the asset can be administered under the trust’s terms. The petition is particularly useful when institutions refuse to accept trust documents alone or when immediate access to particular assets is needed without initiating full probate. The court evaluates trust documents, account records, and declarations attesting to intent. When the court grants relief, it issues an order that institutions and recorders can rely on to recognize the trustee’s authority and transfer or record title accordingly.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the evidence, whether the petition is contested, and the court’s calendar. In straightforward, uncontested matters with clear documentation, the process may be resolved in a few months. More complex or contested cases can take longer as the court may require additional hearings, supplemental declarations, or discovery to resolve disputes among interested parties. Preparation significantly affects timing. Promptly gathering trust documents, title records, and witness declarations shortens the preparation phase and improves the likelihood of a quicker resolution. Working with counsel to anticipate likely objections and prepare persuasive filings helps expedite the court’s consideration and limits delays associated with procedural issues or incomplete evidence.
Courts typically require clear and convincing evidence showing the decedent’s intent to have the asset governed by the trust. Useful evidence includes the trust instrument itself, deeds or other title records indicating intent, beneficiary designations, bank statements, escrow instructions, and correspondence demonstrating steps taken to fund the trust. Declarations from individuals familiar with the decedent’s intentions, such as family members or advisors, can also be persuasive when combined with documentary proof. Additional evidence may include deposit slips, account opening forms, or escrow closing documents showing the trust name, and any draft deeds or recorded instruments prepared prior to death. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence, the stronger the petition appears to the court, increasing the likelihood of obtaining an order recognizing trust ownership.
Costs for a Heggstad petition depend on the complexity of the matter, potential contested issues, and the amount of evidence that must be gathered. In many cases, a Heggstad petition can be less expensive than a full probate administration because it targets specific assets and does not require opening a full probate estate for all property. However, if the matter becomes contested or involves extensive title research, costs can rise accordingly. Comparing costs requires evaluating the alternatives: probate can be more time consuming and generate ongoing administration fees, while a well-prepared petition may resolve particular title issues with less overall expense. Discussing the case specifics with counsel helps estimate likely fees and determine the most cost-effective approach for the estate and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a remedy within California courts and is aimed at resolving California title and trust issues. If the asset in question is located or recorded outside California, different jurisdictional rules may apply. For properties outside the state, similar petitions may exist under local law, or it may be necessary to coordinate with counsel in the other jurisdiction to obtain appropriate recognition and transfer of title. When multi-jurisdictional issues arise, the trustee may need to pursue supplemental proceedings or obtain ancillary recognition in the other state. Coordination between California counsel and local counsel in the other jurisdiction ensures that title issues are addressed in both places so the trustee can manage and distribute the asset according to the trust terms.
If a beneficiary contests a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objections and may schedule hearings to evaluate competing evidence. Contests commonly raise questions about the decedent’s intent, alleged alternative ownership, or creditor claims. When opposition is anticipated, thorough pre-filing preparation and persuasive documentation are especially important to counter challenges and present a clear record supporting trust ownership. Contested proceedings can extend timelines and increase costs, but courts decide based on the evidence presented. Counsel can conduct discovery, prepare witnesses, and handle hearings to protect the trustee’s position. In many cases, mediation or negotiated settlements between interested parties can also resolve disputes without protracted litigation, preserving estate value and family relationships where possible.
After obtaining a court order declaring title in the trust, the trustee generally has authority to sell, refinance, or otherwise manage the property in accordance with the trust’s terms, subject to any limitations in the trust and applicable law. Lenders and title companies commonly accept a certified court order to proceed with transactions. The trustee should ensure all post-order recording and notification steps are completed so third parties have clear evidence of the trustee’s authority. Before proceeding with a sale or refinancing, trustees should confirm that all necessary steps have been followed, such as recording deeds and providing required documentation to the title company and lender. Seeking legal guidance on post-order implementation helps prevent future challenges and ensures that the transaction is supported by the court’s declaration.
If a bank or other institution accepts the trust documents and transfers assets to the trustee without a court order, a Heggstad petition may not be necessary for that particular asset. When institutions voluntarily recognize the trust, transfers can often be completed more quickly, avoiding court involvement. However, bankers sometimes request a court order in unclear or contested situations, and voluntary acceptance is not guaranteed in every case. Carefully documenting the institution’s acceptance and retaining certified copies of any new account titles or deeds is important. If other assets present title problems or if there is any risk of future disputes, seeking judicial confirmation through a Heggstad petition may still be advisable to provide a lasting resolution and prevent later complications.
Common pitfalls include failing to collect contemporaneous evidence showing the decedent’s intent, overlooking necessary witnesses for declarations, and not addressing potential competing claims early. Another frequent issue is inadequate service or procedural errors when filing the petition, which can delay proceedings or require refiling. Preparing a clear, well-documented record and complying with procedural rules helps avoid these pitfalls and improves the petition’s chances of success. Relying solely on oral assertions without supporting documents, neglecting to consider ancillary jurisdictional issues for out-of-state assets, and underestimating institutional requirements for title transfer are additional common mistakes. Thorough preparation, attention to procedural details, and early consultation with counsel reduce the likelihood of these errors derailing the petition process.
To avoid the need for a Heggstad petition later, take proactive steps during estate planning such as retitling assets to the trust, updating beneficiary designations, and ensuring deeds and account titles reflect the trust where intended. Regularly reviewing estate documents and transactions especially after major life events helps maintain alignment between title records and the trust instrument. These preventative measures reduce the risk that property will remain titled in an individual’s name at death. Also maintain clear records of transactions intended to fund the trust and keep copies of trust documents accessible. Communicate trust arrangements with family members and financial institutions when appropriate so that transfers occur smoothly. Working with counsel during life to confirm retitling and documentation provides added assurance that assets will pass as intended without court intervention.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas