A Heggstad Petition is a legal action used to confirm that assets which should have passed to a trust were in fact intended to be trust property at the decedent’s death. For residents of Midway City, California, this process can help avoid prolonged probate by establishing that an asset belongs to a trust and should be distributed according to trust terms. The petition typically explains how the asset was managed and why it was never formally retitled, asking the court to direct the property to the trust without full probate administration, which can save time, expense, and public disclosure compared with traditional probate.
Many families find the Heggstad Petition useful when a decedent used living trust tools but failed to transfer certain assets before death. In Orange County, courts review the circumstances surrounding ownership and the trust documentation to determine whether the asset was intended for the trust. The petition often includes declarations, supporting documentation, and a proposed order. For clients in Midway City, careful preparation and clear presentation of facts help the court see that the decedent’s intent was to have the trust control distribution, enabling an efficient resolution that honors the estate plan without unnecessary delay.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can be a practical step to carry out a decedent’s trust-based plan when assets were not formally transferred before death. The principal benefits include reduced court involvement compared with full probate, a faster route to transferring assets to beneficiaries, and preserving privacy by limiting public filings. For families in Midway City, achieving a judicial determination that an asset was intended for a trust can prevent estate disruption, lessen legal costs over time, and allow trustees and beneficiaries to focus on settling affairs and administering the trust according to the settlor’s wishes rather than dealing with a drawn-out probate process.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services throughout California, including representation for Heggstad Petitions in Orange County. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful document review, and practical pathways to resolving title and trust transfer issues. We work closely with trustees and family members to compile declarations, gather supporting evidence like trust documents and records of intent, and present a concise petition to the court. Our goal is to help clients move assets to the trust efficiently, minimize unnecessary court proceedings, and maintain respect for the decedent’s planned distributions and wishes.
A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property was intended to belong to a living trust despite the absence of formal title transfer before death. Courts evaluate evidence of intent, such as trust documents, beneficiary designations, account statements, and actions showing the decedent treated the asset as trust property. In Midway City and Orange County, petitions must clearly show the chain of events and provide a legal basis for ordering transfer to the trustee. Properly prepared petitions often include declarations from the trustee or other witnesses and copies of relevant documents that support the claim.
The Heggstad Petition may be used for many asset types, including real property, bank or brokerage accounts, and other assets that were intended for the trust. The court’s decision depends on the totality of evidence demonstrating that the decedent intended the trust to control the asset at death. When accepted by the court, the order will provide clear title direction and allow trustees to distribute or manage the asset per the trust. This process helps avoid full probate administration, which can be longer and more public, helping families preserve confidentiality and speed distribution to beneficiaries.
A Heggstad Petition requests a judicial finding that an asset should have been part of a trust at the decedent’s death and therefore should be transferred to the trustee rather than probate. The petition explains the facts showing intent, such as consistent trust-funded accounts, instructions within the trust, or documents reflecting the trust’s role. The court then decides whether to grant an order directing the title transfer to the trust. The remedy is focused on honoring the decedent’s intended estate plan by aligning asset ownership with trust terms, streamlining settlement, and reducing administrative burdens on family members and trustees.
A well-prepared Heggstad Petition includes a clear statement of the asset at issue, evidence of the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust, relevant trust documents, and declarations or affidavits from those with knowledge of the decedent’s actions. The filing must comply with California probate rules, provide notice to interested parties, and propose a specific court order for transfer. Supporting evidence can include financial statements, correspondence, and testimony showing that the decedent treated the property as trust property, which together assist the court in determining the proper disposition without resorting to full probate.
Understanding common terms used in trust and probate proceedings helps petitioners and beneficiaries follow the court process. Definitions cover trust, trustee, settlor, probate, title transfer, order confirming trust property, and related procedural concepts. Familiarity with these terms clarifies what supportive documents must be gathered and how the court evaluates claims. In Midway City matters, having a clear grasp of these definitions enables trustees and family members to communicate effectively, provide accurate evidence, and anticipate the procedural steps needed to obtain a favorable order that transfers the asset into the trust and allows distribution per the settlor’s wishes.
A trust is a legal arrangement where a settlor transfers assets to a trustee to hold for the benefit of named beneficiaries, often with terms for distribution and management during life or after death. Trusts can be revocable or irrevocable and are commonly used to avoid probate, provide privacy, and set conditions for inheritance. In Heggstad Petition matters, the trust document and its terms are central evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent for assets to pass under the trust, and the petition seeks to have the court confirm that specific assets are governed by the trust rather than by probate procedures.
A Heggstad Petition is a type of probate court filing asking the court to determine that property which remained in the decedent’s name at death was intended to be trust property. The petition provides a legal mechanism for transferring title to the trustee when documents or actions indicate the settlor’s intent but formal retitling was not completed. The petition often includes declarations, financial records, and the trust instrument, and seeks a court order clarifying ownership so trustees can manage or distribute the asset according to the trust terms without undergoing full probate administration.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed to manage the trust property in accordance with the terms of the trust and for the benefit of the beneficiaries. The trustee’s responsibilities include gathering trust assets, managing investments, paying debts and taxes, and distributing property as directed by the trust instrument. In the context of a Heggstad Petition, the trustee typically files or supports the petition to obtain a court order confirming the trustee’s authority to take title to the asset and carry out the settlor’s instructions for distribution and management.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets do not pass by trust, joint ownership, or beneficiary designation. Probate includes validating wills, identifying assets, paying debts, and distributing property to heirs. A Heggstad Petition seeks to avoid full probate for specific assets by showing they were intended to be trust property, allowing those assets to transfer directly to the trustee under an order. Avoiding probate can reduce administrative delays, public filings, and some costs associated with estate settlement.
When an asset remains in the decedent’s name, families must choose between full probate or pursuing a Heggstad Petition to transfer that asset to the trust. Probate is comprehensive and addresses all estate matters under court supervision, which can be necessary in complex scenarios or when the trust approach is not supported by evidence. A Heggstad Petition focuses on a specific asset and relies on proof of intent to include it in a trust. This limited path can be quicker and less public, but it requires convincing documentation and legal argumentation tailored to the asset and surrounding circumstances.
A limited Heggstad Petition may be sufficient when there is persuasive documentation showing the decedent treated the asset as trust property, such as trust provisions, account records, or correspondence indicating intent. If evidence demonstrates the settlor’s consistent plan to fund the trust and the asset’s status fits within that plan, the court may grant an order transferring the asset to the trustee. In these situations, families often prefer a focused petition because it can resolve title quickly and allow the trustee to manage or distribute the property according to the trust, avoiding the broader probate process.
A narrow Heggstad Petition is more viable when there is minimal dispute among beneficiaries and interested parties regarding the decedent’s intent. If beneficiaries and potential heirs agree that an asset belonged to the trust and are willing to support the petition, the court is more likely to order transfer without full probate. Consensus reduces litigation risk and simplifies the evidentiary presentation. When conflicts are unlikely and records support the trust claim, the limited approach can achieve timely asset transfer while conserving legal resources and preserving family relationships.
Comprehensive legal service, including full probate administration, becomes necessary when there are substantial disputes among heirs or when the decedent’s intentions are unclear or contradicted by documentation. In such cases, the court must supervise a thorough process to identify creditors, validate claims, and resolve ownership. When title records, beneficiary designations, or trust documents are ambiguous, a full probate approach provides a structured mechanism for resolving contested matters and ensuring all parties have notice and an opportunity to present their positions before assets are distributed.
Full probate may also be appropriate when an estate includes numerous or complex assets, significant creditor claims, or potential tax issues that require court oversight and formal accounting. When transferring multiple properties or dealing with complex creditor priority questions, the structured procedures of probate offer clarity and finality. In such circumstances, legal representation assists in navigating filings, notices, and required court appearances to ensure a complete and compliant administration of the estate under California law, protecting the rights of beneficiaries and creditors alike.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust transfer issues ensures all legal bases are covered, evidence is properly documented, and any potential disputes are identified early. This thorough preparation can prevent later challenges, clarify title for third parties such as banks or county recorder offices, and support a durable court order transferring assets to the trustee. For families in Midway City, taking a complete approach reduces the risk of reopening matters later, helps secure clear chain-of-title documentation, and allows trustees to manage assets with confidence that the transfer was legally validated.
Thorough preparation also aids in communication with beneficiaries and other interested parties, providing a defensible record of the settlor’s intent and the steps taken to honor that intent. This can lessen friction among family members and make external transactions, such as selling real property or re-titling accounts, smoother. When courts issue orders after careful review, third parties are more likely to accept the trustee’s authority, facilitating timely distributions and asset management consistent with the trust’s terms and the decedent’s wishes.
A comprehensive petition with well-organized evidence increases the likelihood of a clear judicial finding and an order that third parties will rely upon. Courts appreciate submissions that present documented intent, consistent records, and credible declarations, enabling trustees to obtain conclusive direction about title. This clarity is particularly helpful when dealing with county recorders, financial institutions, or potential buyers who require assurance that property is held by the trustee. The result is a more reliable path to effectuate the settlor’s plan while reducing later challenges.
Addressing trust transfer issues comprehensively helps to identify and mitigate potential points of contention before they arise, often preventing later disputes that can result in costly litigation. By collecting full documentation and offering clear legal arguments, the petition creates a record that supports the trustee’s authority and the trust’s terms. This diligence can discourage parties from contesting transfers and offers courts a clear factual basis for their rulings, which ultimately protects beneficiaries and preserves estate assets for their intended distribution.
Collecting comprehensive documentation is the foundation of a successful Heggstad Petition. Relevant records include the trust instrument, any amendments or certifications of trust, account statements, deeds, beneficiary forms, correspondence indicating the decedent’s intent, and notes of actions taken to fund the trust. Clear organization of these items, with copies and dates, helps the court see the sequence of events. For trustees in Midway City, assembling a complete file reduces back-and-forth, speeds review, and strengthens the petition by presenting coherent evidence of the settlor’s plan to include the asset in the trust.
Be mindful of the requirement to notify interested parties and potential heirs about the petition. Providing appropriate notice and addressing likely objections in the petition itself can reduce opposition and streamline proceedings. Where possible, securing the assent of beneficiaries or explaining their positions in declarations helps the court understand the level of consensus. Thoughtful notice practices and transparent communication among family members in Midway City can prevent surprises, limit contested litigation, and help the court reach an orderly resolution that serves the trust’s purposes.
Filing a Heggstad Petition is an option when a trust exists but certain assets remain titled in the decedent’s name. If you want to transfer such assets to the trust without a full probate, the petition can provide a court order directing that transfer, helping to carry out the settlor’s intended distribution. For families in Midway City, this approach can mean quicker access to funds or property, reduced public exposure of estate details, and a smoother transition of asset control to the trustee for administration or distribution according to the trust terms.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad Petition is to reduce administrative burden and costs compared with a full probate estate. When documentation supports the conclusion that an asset belonged to the trust, the petition allows a targeted remedy focused on that asset alone. This can be particularly helpful for single-asset disputes, such as a single parcel of real estate or a bank account, enabling trustees to obtain the necessary court directive to re-title the asset and manage it under the trust without engaging in an exhaustive probate administration.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad Petition include when a decedent intended to fund a living trust but did not complete title transfers, when assets were overlooked during estate administration, or when jointly held property has conflicting documentation. Other scenarios involve changes in property records, bank or brokerage accounts lacking clear beneficiary designations, or deeds not yet recorded in the name of the trustee. In such cases, a focused petition can clarify ownership and expedite transfer to the trust so distributions proceed according to the settlor’s plan rather than default probate rules.
One common situation is real property that the decedent intended to place in a living trust but failed to record a deed transferring ownership to the trustee. When evidence like the trust deed, mortgage records, payment history, or correspondence shows the property was treated as trust property, a Heggstad Petition can ask the court to transfer title to the trustee. Obtaining a court order enables the trustee to record a new deed or otherwise clear title, facilitating sale, refinancing, or distribution to beneficiaries without full probate proceedings.
Bank and brokerage accounts are often overlooked when funding a trust. If the decedent intended those accounts to be part of the trust but did not complete retitling before death, a Heggstad Petition may be appropriate. Supporting evidence may include trust terms naming the trustee, account statements showing management consistent with trust funding efforts, or beneficiary forms directing disposition to the trust. The court’s order can allow the financial institution to recognize the trustee’s authority and transfer the account into the trust for administration or distribution.
Assets sometimes have confusing records, conflicting beneficiary designations, or incomplete paperwork that leaves unclear whether they should pass through trust administration. In those cases, a Heggstad Petition compiles the facts and asks the court to confirm ownership once intent is established. Documents such as certification of trust, correspondence, or actions showing the settlor intended trust control can resolve ambiguity. A judicial order then clarifies title and reduces the risk of later claims by providing authoritative direction for trustees and third parties handling the asset.
If you are dealing with assets that were not fully transferred into a living trust, local guidance can make a substantive difference in preparing a successful petition. For residents of Midway City, we provide support gathering trust paperwork, drafting declarations, and organizing the evidence the court needs to evaluate intent. We also help with the necessary notices and filings required by Orange County probate courts. Our priority is to present a clear, organized petition so the court can issue an order transferring the affected asset to the trustee and enabling trust administration to move forward.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has long assisted California families with trust funding, trust administration, and court petitions that clarify ownership of assets. Our approach focuses on careful document review and clear legal presentations tailored to Orange County procedures, helping trustees make a persuasive case to the probate court. We work to collect the records and declarations that demonstrate intent, prepare notice to interested parties, and submit a coherent petition that supports transfer to the trust while minimizing unnecessary delays and procedural hurdles.
We recognize the sensitivity of family matters involving estate transfers and aim to handle each situation with practical guidance and transparent communication. From initial intake to filing and court appearances, we help trustees navigate the process and understand what evidence will be most compelling. Our goal is to secure a court order that the trustee can rely upon to obtain title or asset control, enabling distribution or management according to the trust, all while treating family members and beneficiaries respectfully throughout the proceedings.
In Midway City and across Orange County, we assist with related estate planning tools that often accompany a Heggstad Petition, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certification of trust, and guardianship nominations. By addressing both the immediate petition and any follow-up funding actions, we help ensure the trust functions as intended and that the settlor’s plans are implemented efficiently. Having coordinated plans and clear records reduces risks of future disputes and supports smoother administration for trustees and beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust documents and the specific asset, followed by assembling evidence that supports the conclusion the asset was intended for the trust. We prepare required declarations, collect supporting records, and draft the petition and proposed order for the probate court. We also handle notice to interested parties and respond to any procedural requirements. Throughout, we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed so the court filing proceeds smoothly and the trustee can obtain authority to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms.
The first step involves gathering all relevant documents and information, including the trust instrument, any amendments, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and correspondence. We interview the trustee and family members to understand the decedent’s actions and intent. This stage is focused on assembling a clear factual record to support a petition. Organizing documents chronologically and labeling key items helps to streamline petition drafting and reduce the need for additional discovery or follow-up requests during court review.
We carefully review the trust document and supporting records to identify provisions and facts relevant to the asset at issue. This includes confirming trustee authority, understanding distribution terms, and noting any language indicating the settlor’s desire to transfer the asset into the trust. We also look for prior attempts to fund the trust or actions showing intent, which are critical in persuading the court. Thorough review at this stage ensures the petition will address anticipated questions and present a coherent narrative about the asset’s intended ownership.
We help draft declarations from the trustee and other knowledgeable individuals that describe the decedent’s actions, statements, and conduct regarding the asset. These declarations are factual and focus on observable behavior, such as the decedent referring to the asset as part of their estate plan or taking steps to manage it with trust purposes in mind. Clear, corroborated declarations strengthen the petition and provide the court with a reliable factual foundation for finding that the asset belonged to the trust at the decedent’s death.
After assembling the necessary documents and declarations, we prepare the petition, proposed order, and supporting exhibits for filing with the probate court. The petition explains the legal basis for the requested transfer, cites relevant trust provisions and evidence, and identifies all interested parties who must receive notice. Filing includes paying filing fees, following local court rules for formatting and service, and initiating the formal process to request the court’s determination that the asset should be treated as trust property and transferred to the trustee.
We draft a concise petition that identifies the asset, summarizes the evidence of intent, and attaches key exhibits such as the trust instrument, account statements, and declarations. The petition proposes an order directing transfer to the trustee and explains why the court should grant the requested relief. Well-organized exhibits and a clear legal argument make it easier for the court to evaluate the matter and issue an order that resolves the ownership question without requiring a full probate administration for that specific asset.
Proper service of notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and interested parties is a required element of the process. We ensure that all required parties receive appropriate notice and that any local probate court requirements are met, including timelines for objection and hearing dates. Compliance with procedural rules reduces the risk of delays or defects that could undermine the petition. Providing clear notice also allows affected parties an opportunity to raise concerns, which can then be addressed in declarations or during hearings to avoid future disputes.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence to the judge, explain the factual record, and respond to any objections. The court may issue an order granting the petition and directing the transfer of title to the trustee, sometimes with conditions. If the petition is unopposed and well-documented, the court may act more quickly. After the order is entered, we help record deeds, notify financial institutions, or take other steps needed to reflect the trustee’s authority over the asset and facilitate administration under the trust’s terms.
When required, we attend court hearings and present the factual record and legal arguments in support of the petition. If any interested party objects, we work to resolve concerns through declarations, clarifying evidence, or negotiation to narrow issues for the court. Our preparation anticipates likely objections and addresses them in the petition to minimize the need for extended litigation. Securing a clear court order allows trustees to proceed with confidence in managing or distributing the asset as directed by the trust.
Once the court grants the petition and signs an order, we assist with implementing the court’s directives, such as recording a new deed for real property or providing the order to a financial institution to change account ownership. We ensure any follow-up filings meet county recorder or institutional requirements and that the trustee’s actions comply with the trust’s terms. Proper implementation closes the loop on the transfer, enabling trustees to administer trust assets and distribute property to beneficiaries without further delay or uncertainty.
A Heggstad Petition is a court filing that seeks a judicial determination that an asset which remained in the decedent’s name at death was intended to be part of a living trust. The petition asks the probate court to transfer title or otherwise recognize the trustee’s authority over the asset so it can be administered under the trust terms. It is commonly used when funding errors, oversights, or timing issues left property titled outside the trust despite the settlor’s intent to include it. The petition presents evidence of the decedent’s intent, such as trust provisions, account histories, deeds, and declarations from those with direct knowledge. If the court is satisfied the asset should be treated as trust property, it issues an order directing transfer to the trustee. This procedure provides a targeted remedy for specific assets and can avoid the time and public nature of full probate for those items.
A Heggstad Petition focuses on a particular asset and asks the court to confirm that it belonged to a trust at the time of the decedent’s death, allowing that asset to pass via the trust rather than through probate. Probate is a comprehensive court process that oversees distribution of all assets that do not pass outside probate, requiring formal administration, creditor notices, and accounting in many cases. The Heggstad route is narrower and intended to resolve title questions for specific property. While a successful petition can prevent probate for the asset at issue, it does not replace probate when the estate requires formal administration for other reasons, such as significant creditor claims or disputes over the will or other assets. The Heggstad process complements estate administration options by offering a focused legal tool to clarify ownership and facilitate trust-based distribution for particular assets.
Courts weigh the totality of evidence showing the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Relevant items include the trust instrument and any amendments, account statements, deeds, affidavits, correspondence, and actions taken by the decedent that indicate trust funding efforts. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who observed the decedent’s planning can be important, provided they stick to factual observations and avoid speculation about motives. The court evaluates consistency between the asset and the trust plan, looking for documentation or conduct showing the decedent treated the property as belonging to the trust. Clear, contemporaneous records tend to carry more weight than informal statements, and the petition’s strength depends on presenting a coherent factual narrative supported by exhibits that demonstrate intent at the relevant times.
California probate rules require notice to all interested parties when filing a Heggstad Petition, which typically includes trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, and persons entitled to receive notice under the trust or probate statutes. Proper service ensures that individuals with potential rights to the asset have an opportunity to object or participate in the proceeding. The petition must list and serve these parties according to local court rules to ensure the process is procedurally sound. Providing notice early and clearly can reduce surprises and help identify potential objections that may be resolved before a hearing. If an interested party objects, the court will consider the objection and the evidence presented by both sides before making a determination. Addressing notice requirements carefully also helps avoid procedural defects that could delay transfer or invite later challenges.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the completeness of documentation, the court’s schedule, and whether objections arise. Uncontested petitions with clear evidence and proper notice can sometimes be resolved more quickly than full probate, potentially within a few months, though exact timing depends on the local probate calendar and any required publication or service deadlines. If the matter is contested or additional evidence is needed, the process can take longer. Preparing a thorough petition with complete supporting documents and accurate service can shorten the timeline and reduce the risk of continuances. Consulting with counsel early helps anticipate potential delays and prepare a strong record to move the matter efficiently through the court.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties may contest a Heggstad Petition if they dispute the claim that the asset belonged to the trust or if they assert competing rights to the property. Objections might focus on lack of evidence of intent, conflicting documents, or questions about the trust’s validity. If an objection is filed, the court will consider the arguments and supporting evidence from all sides before issuing a decision. Contested matters can extend the process, requiring additional declarations, evidentiary support, and possibly hearings. Addressing likely objections proactively through comprehensive documentation and clear declarations can reduce the likelihood of contest and help the court reach a prompt resolution that reflects the settlor’s documented intentions.
After the court grants a Heggstad Petition and issues an order, the trustee can rely on that order to transfer title or manage the asset under the trust. For real property, the order may be recorded to update the county records; for financial accounts, the trustee can present the order to a bank or brokerage to change ownership or access funds. The order provides a judicial basis for the trustee’s authority and helps third parties accept the trustee’s direction. Following the order, trustees should complete any ministerial steps required to reflect the new ownership, such as recording deeds, updating account registrations, or providing copies of the order to institutions. Those steps finalize the transfer and allow trustees to administer and distribute the asset according to the trust’s provisions.
A successful Heggstad Petition prevents probate only for the asset at issue by obtaining a court order that the asset should be treated as trust property. It does not automatically prevent probate for other assets that remain outside the trust or when the estate as a whole requires formal administration. Whether probate is necessary depends on the overall estate circumstances, including the types and values of assets and any outstanding creditor or family issues. Where the Heggstad Petition resolves title for specific items, trustees can handle those assets through the trust, reducing the scope of any probate process. This targeted approach is useful when most estate assets are correctly titled but a small subset requires court clarification to honor the settlor’s trust-based plan.
Begin by locating the trust document, any amendments, certifications of trust, deeds, account statements, and correspondence reflecting the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Make copies of all relevant records and prepare a timeline of actions taken regarding the asset. Identifying potential interested parties early helps with required service and notice. Prepare factual notes on conversations or conduct indicating the decedent’s plan to include the asset in the trust, focusing on observable behaviors rather than assumptions. Organizing this material and presenting it clearly will assist in drafting a persuasive petition. Planning ahead and collecting corroborating documentation minimizes the need for later discovery or additional court submissions. Practical preparation helps present a coherent narrative that supports the trustee’s request for a court order transferring the asset to the trust.
Review the trust instrument, any amendments, certification of trust, deeds, account agreements, beneficiary designations, and related financial records. Also examine correspondence or notes that reflect the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. A pour-over will, which directs assets to the trust upon death, is relevant but may not be sufficient on its own to avoid a Heggstad Petition if title was not transferred before death. Having these documents organized is critical to supporting a petition. Additionally, consider documents related to guardianship nominations, powers of attorney, and health care directives as they can provide broader context about the decedent’s planning objectives. While these items may not directly prove intent to fund a specific asset, they help demonstrate the overall estate planning framework and the settlor’s intent to manage assets through trust arrangements.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas