A trust modification petition can be the appropriate legal path when circumstances change after a trust has been established. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist California clients, including residents of Mission Viejo, who need to adjust trust terms to reflect new family dynamics, changes in assets, tax planning adjustments, or unforeseen events. This guide explains the petition process, eligibility considerations, and practical outcomes so that you can make informed decisions. If you are unsure whether a modification petition is right for you, a consultation with our firm can clarify options and next steps tailored to your situation.
Trust modification petitions involve court-authorized changes to a trust when parties cannot or should not modify the document informally. Common reasons include correcting drafting errors, addressing changed beneficiary needs, or adapting to legislative or financial changes. Although many trusts are amended privately when all parties agree, some situations require filing a petition in probate court to ensure changes are legally effective and enforceable. This guide outlines why a petition may be necessary and what the court looks for when evaluating requests, helping you approach the process with realistic expectations and sound preparation.
A trust modification petition can restore fairness, correct mistakes, or adapt a trust to reflect current circumstances while maintaining the trust structure that the grantor intended. Petitioning the court can provide clear legal authority for changes, reduce later disputes, and create an official record of the updated terms. This approach is particularly beneficial when beneficiaries disagree, when the trust instrument lacks clear amendment language, or when state law requires judicial approval for certain alterations. The resulting clarity can help protect family relationships and ensure assets are managed and distributed as contemplated under the revised terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves California families with a focus on estate planning and trust-related matters. Our approach emphasizes careful analysis of existing trust documents, thoughtful consideration of client goals, and clear communication throughout the petition process. For Mission Viejo clients, we combine local knowledge with a statewide practice in probate and trust proceedings, helping clients navigate deadlines, court rules, and procedural requirements. We prioritize practical solutions and advocate for results that protect beneficiaries and preserve the grantor’s wishes while minimizing unnecessary delay and expense.
Trust modification petitions are legal requests submitted to probate court seeking permission to change a trust’s terms when private amendment is impossible or disputed. Court intervention may be necessary if potential beneficiaries contest a change, if the original trust lacks clear amendment language, or if the modification involves altering dispositive provisions that affect beneficiaries’ rights. The petition process typically requires detailed documentation of the trust’s existing terms, evidence supporting the proposed change, and notice to interested parties. The court will weigh the petition against statutory standards and the grantor’s intent in deciding whether to authorize the change.
Not every desired alteration requires a petition; many trusts include clear amendment procedures that allow private changes when parties consent. A petition is more likely when there are conflicting claims, concerns about capacity at the time of amendment, or potential undue influence claims. The court’s primary concern is upholding the settlor’s intent while ensuring changes are legally valid and equitable. Preparing a strong petition involves gathering evidence, communicating with beneficiaries where possible, and presenting a persuasive legal argument to the court that the change serves the trust’s purpose and honors the settlor’s objectives.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a California probate court to alter the terms of an existing trust when informal amendment is not feasible. The petition lays out the specific changes sought, explains the reasons for those changes, and identifies affected parties. The court evaluates whether the requested modification aligns with governing statutes and the grantor’s intentions, and whether notices and procedural safeguards have been observed. The petition can address a wide range of issues, from correcting language and clarifying administrative provisions to changing beneficial interests when circumstances have materially changed since the trust was created.
A successful trust modification petition typically includes a clear statement of the requested changes, a factual basis for the changes, supporting documents such as the trust instrument and related amendments, and proof of notice to interested parties. The petitioner must explain why the court’s intervention is necessary and how the modification preserves or restores the settlor’s intent. The process involves filing the petition with the appropriate probate court, serving notice to beneficiaries and interested parties, attending any hearings, and complying with court orders. Attention to procedural detail is essential to avoid delays or dismissal.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process. This glossary covers words and phrases you are likely to encounter, explains their significance in the modification context, and describes how they relate to rights and duties of trustees and beneficiaries. Becoming familiar with these terms allows clients to participate more effectively in planning and court proceedings, understand notices and orders, and evaluate the options available for achieving modification. Clear definitions also help reduce confusion when multiple parties interpret the trust language differently or when court intervention is requested.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. In modification matters, the settlor’s original intent and capacity at the time of creation or subsequent amendment are central considerations. If the settlor is alive, the court may consider their wishes and any documented statements. If the settlor is deceased, the court relies on the trust document and admissible evidence to interpret intent. Questions about capacity, coercion, or changed circumstances often hinge on what the settlor intended when establishing or amending the trust.
Beneficiary rights refer to the legal interests that individuals or entities hold under the trust, including rights to receive distributions, information about trust administration, and the ability to challenge certain trustee actions. In modification petitions, beneficiaries must be notified of proposed changes because those changes may affect their distributions or other rights. The court evaluates how modifications impact beneficiaries and whether notice and opportunity to be heard were provided. Protecting beneficiary rights is a key function of the court review process to ensure fairness and transparency.
A trust amendment is typically a private, unilateral change made according to procedures set forth in the trust document, often requiring the settlor’s action and possibly trustee involvement. A modification, as sought through a court petition, is a judicially authorized alteration when private amendment is impractical, disputed, or insufficient to address the issue. Court-ordered modifications are binding and ensure enforceability but require adherence to legal standards and notice requirements. Understanding the distinction helps determine whether to pursue a private amendment or a formal petition.
Judicial reformation is a court process to correct mistakes or clarify ambiguous trust language so that the document reflects the settlor’s actual intent. Reformation can be part of a modification petition when the trust contains drafting errors or inconsistent provisions. The court reviews extrinsic evidence, trust language, and the surrounding circumstances to determine whether reformation is warranted. This remedy aims to ensure the trust operates according to the settlor’s goals without unintentionally disadvantaging beneficiaries or disrupting the trust’s administration.
When considering changes to a trust, you may choose private amendment, a trust modification petition, or other probate court remedies depending on the situation. Private amendment works when all relevant parties agree and the trust allows for it. A petition is appropriate when formal court approval is needed to resolve disputes, address capacity concerns, or obtain a clear judicial ruling. Other options include reformation petitions or trust decanting when permitted. Evaluating costs, timelines, and the potential for contested proceedings is essential in choosing the approach that best protects interests and achieves the desired outcome.
A private amendment can be effective when the settlor and all affected parties agree to the change and the trust’s terms permit amendment without court involvement. When there is consensus, amendments can often be processed quickly and with minimal expense, allowing the trust to reflect current intentions without formal judicial review. Proper documentation and notarized signatures reduce future disputes. It remains important to ensure that the amendment complies with governing law and is executed in a way that preserves the legal integrity of the trust and its administration over time.
Administrative changes, such as updating a trustee’s contact information, changing the trust’s governing law provision when allowed, or clarifying procedural aspects, may not require a court petition if the trust grants the trustee or settlor the authority to make such adjustments. These kinds of revisions typically pose less risk to beneficiaries’ economic interests and can often be handled through proper documentation and communication. Even for administrative changes, keeping beneficiaries informed helps prevent misunderstandings and preserves trust in the administration process.
When beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes or when competing claims arise, filing a trust modification petition with full legal representation is often the most effective course. The court process allows presentation of evidence, examination of trust language, and resolution under applicable California law. Professional support helps manage procedural requirements, develop persuasive factual records, and represent client interests at hearings. Comprehensive representation aims to reduce the risk of future litigation and secure a stable, enforceable outcome that reflects the court’s thorough review of the situation.
Trust changes involving significant assets, retirement accounts, business interests, or tax-sensitive transfers present legal and practical complexities that benefit from a comprehensive approach. Court oversight can clarify how a modification interacts with tax treatment, creditor claims, or beneficiary entitlements. Carefully prepared petitions and supporting documentation minimize unintended tax consequences and ensure the trust administration aligns with broader financial and estate planning goals. Professional guidance assists in structuring proposed changes to preserve asset management objectives while complying with legal requirements.
A comprehensive, court-authorized modification helps establish a clear, enforceable record of the trust’s updated terms, which can reduce ambiguity and deter future disputes. The judicial process provides impartial oversight, ensures notice to interested parties, and confirms that required legal standards are met. When a trust is modified through the court, beneficiaries and trustees have assurance that the changes are recognized under state law and can be relied upon for administration, distribution, and tax purposes. This stability is particularly valuable for families seeking long-term certainty in trust management.
Another benefit of pursuing a formal petition is the ability to address multiple issues in a single proceeding, including clarification of trustee powers, correction of drafting errors, or resolution of competing claims. Consolidating these matters into one process can reduce cumulative legal costs and streamline judicial review. The resulting court order provides a definitive statement of the trust’s terms, which can simplify ongoing administration and provide trustees with authoritative guidance when carrying out their duties on behalf of beneficiaries.
A court-approved modification creates a formal judgment or order reflecting the revised trust terms, which helps prevent repeated challenges and clarifies the rights of beneficiaries and trustees. This legal finality reduces the uncertainty that can accompany private agreements and makes the trust easier to administer over time. When disputes are resolved through court process, the reasons for the modification and the court’s findings become part of the record, offering protection against subsequent claims based on ambiguity or misunderstanding about the settlor’s intent.
Court involvement yields explicit judicial guidance about how the amended terms should be interpreted and applied, which helps trustees perform their duties with confidence and beneficiaries understand their entitlements. This clarity can prevent administration errors, reduce conflict, and promote efficient distribution of trust property. Trustees benefit from knowing that changes have been judicially vetted, reducing personal liability concerns and enabling smoother management of trust assets consistent with the court’s directions.
Start by collecting the trust instrument, any existing amendments, related estate planning documents, and financial records for trust assets. Having complete documentation helps clarify the current trust terms, demonstrates the factual basis for proposed changes, and supports claims about the settlor’s intent. Early document gathering also identifies potential discrepancies or competing claims that may require additional evidence. Well-organized records streamline the petition drafting process, reduce court delays, and make it easier to communicate with beneficiaries and the court about the requested modifications.
Build the petition around objective facts, contemporaneous documents, and a clear explanation of why the requested change reflects the settlor’s intent or is necessary for proper administration. Courts weigh evidence of intent, capacity, and fairness when deciding on modifications. Presenting a reasoned, well-documented case reduces the likelihood of extended litigation and increases the chances of a favorable outcome. Objective supporting materials may include prior communications, account statements, appraisals, and affidavits addressing relevant circumstances that support the proposed modification.
Consider a petition if the trust contains drafting errors, ambiguous language, or provisions that no longer reflect family or financial realities. Changes in relationships, the discovery of additional assets, or tax law developments may all prompt consideration of formal modifications. If beneficiaries are likely to challenge proposed changes or if the trust lacks clear amendment authority, a petition provides the court’s imprimatur and ensures enforceability. Evaluating the reasons for change, potential objections, and the expected benefits helps determine whether a petition is the appropriate path forward.
Other reasons to pursue a modification petition include correcting mistakes made in earlier documents, clarifying trustee powers to manage new types of assets, or addressing issues that could impair the trust’s administration. When dealing with diverse asset types such as retirement accounts, business interests, or out-of-state property, court approval can reduce future friction and provide certainty. A well-prepared petition can align the trust with present needs while minimizing the risk of prolonged disputes that could deplete trust resources and harm beneficiaries’ interests.
Typical circumstances include when beneficiaries object to proposed changes, when the settlor has died and the trust’s terms do not anticipate changed conditions, or when the trust document contains ambiguous provisions that create interpretive disputes. Other triggers include the discovery of new assets, errors in trust drafting, or changes in family structure such as divorces or births. In these scenarios, petitioning the court provides a formal mechanism to clarify terms, address competing claims, and reestablish a workable plan for trust management and distribution.
When beneficiaries disagree about the meaning of trust provisions or about proposed amendments, filing a petition can bring the dispute before the court for impartial resolution. The judicial process can reconcile competing interpretations, determine whether proposed modifications are consistent with the settlor’s intent, and rule on claims such as incapacity or undue influence. By addressing disagreements in court, parties gain a definitive ruling that supports future administration and reduces the chance of repeated litigation over the same issues.
Drafting errors, ambiguous clauses, or omitted provisions discovered after the trust’s creation often require court action to correct or clarify the instrument. A petition for reformation or modification asks the court to interpret the trust according to the settlor’s original intent and to fix mistakes that could undermine administration. Addressing these issues early through a formal petition helps prevent future disputes and ensures that trustees have clear authority to manage and distribute assets in a manner consistent with the corrected terms.
Major life events such as remarriage, the birth of a child, divorce, or significant changes in asset composition can make existing trust provisions unsuitable. When private amendment is not feasible or when parties disagree about the appropriate response, a trust modification petition provides a legal avenue to adjust the trust terms responsibly. The court evaluates whether the proposed changes are reasonable and consistent with the settlor’s intent, helping ensure that the trust structure remains aligned with current family and financial realities.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman extends services to Mission Viejo residents needing trust modification guidance. Whether you are facing a disputed amendment, discovering drafting errors, or seeking court approval for necessary changes, our approach focuses on practical solutions and thorough preparation. We coordinate with clients to assemble documents, prepare compelling petitions, and navigate local probate court procedures. Our goal is to achieve clear, enforceable results that allow trustees and beneficiaries to move forward with confidence in the trust’s administration and distribution plans.
Selecting counsel for a trust modification petition is about finding a team that understands both the legal framework and the human dimensions of estate matters. Our firm has a longstanding practice assisting California families with trust issues, and we focus on building the factual record and legal argument necessary for court consideration. We guide clients through notice requirements, evidence collection, and court hearings so that proposed changes are presented clearly and persuasively, with attention to minimizing delay and expense.
We emphasize clear communication with clients and interested parties, helping to identify potential objections early and to explore opportunities for limited agreement where possible. When disputes cannot be resolved informally, we prepare petitions that explain the reasons for modification and support the requested relief with admissible documentation. This structured approach seeks to reduce contentious proceedings and to obtain court orders that will be durable and practical for trustees to implement in administering trust assets.
Our representation includes careful attention to procedural deadlines and local court practices that can affect the timing and outcome of petitions. We assist in drafting petitions, compiling supporting affidavits, and representing clients at hearings to communicate the policy and factual bases for requested modifications. The goal is to secure a resolution that upholds the settlor’s intent and provides clear guidance for ongoing administration, while avoiding unnecessary expense or delay in caring for beneficiaries’ interests.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust instrument and related documents to determine whether a private amendment is feasible or whether a petition is necessary. We then develop a strategy that considers notice requirements, evidentiary needs, and potential objections. Drafting the petition involves clear legal argumentation and supporting declarations that document relevant facts. Once filed, we manage service of process, monitor responses, and represent clients at hearings, working to achieve a timely and enforceable court order that reflects the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
We begin by reviewing the trust, amendments, beneficiary designations, and related estate planning documents to identify the legal issues and factual support for modification. This assessment clarifies whether a petition is necessary or whether a private amendment could suffice, and it identifies parties who must be notified. Gathering comprehensive documentation and understanding the trust’s objectives help shape the petition strategy and determine the strongest path for resolving disputes or securing approval for the requested changes.
Collecting all relevant records is essential to support a petition. These materials include the original trust document, any amendments, account statements, property descriptions, and correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Clear documentation helps establish the basis for requesting modifications and provides the court with a full picture of the trust’s terms and assets. Organized records also simplify preparation of the petition and supporting declarations, reducing the risk of procedural objections based on incomplete information.
During the initial stage, we identify beneficiaries, successor trustees, and any other interested parties who must receive notice of the petition. We also assess potential legal issues such as questions of capacity, undue influence, or conflicting beneficiary expectations. Early identification of these factors allows us to prepare appropriate evidence and consider whether negotiation or mediation might resolve some disputes without full litigation, always keeping the client’s goals and the settlor’s intent at the forefront of strategy.
Once the factual foundation is assembled, we draft the petition to the probate court describing the requested modifications and supporting facts. The petition includes proposed revised trust language or a clear statement of the relief sought, as well as declarations and exhibits that document the trust and rationale for change. Filing must comply with local court rules and statutory requirements, and we coordinate service of notice to interested parties. Thoughtful petition drafting is critical to presenting a persuasive case and avoiding procedural pitfalls.
Drafting involves crafting a clearly worded petition that explains why court approval is necessary and how the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent or the trust’s purposes. Supporting declarations present factual evidence, such as contemporaneous statements, financial records, or other materials that substantiate the petition. Properly organized exhibits and legal citations help the court understand the context and authority for modification. Comprehensive drafting reduces the risk of adjournments or requests for additional information from the court.
After filing the petition, we ensure that all required parties receive proper notice under California law and local court procedures. Compliance with service rules and filing protocols is closely tracked to prevent procedural objections. We prepare proof of service documents and respond to any immediate procedural inquiries. Ensuring strict compliance at this stage protects the petition from technical challenges and keeps the case on schedule toward hearing or resolution.
Following filing and service, the court schedules hearings where parties can present evidence, argue legal points, and address objections. Our role is to present a clear, well-documented case to the judge, support client testimony when appropriate, and counter opposing arguments with admissible evidence. The court may grant the petition, deny it, or fashion narrower relief. Once the court issues an order, we assist in implementing the changes and updating trust administration practices to reflect the court’s directives.
Preparing for hearings involves organizing exhibits, drafting witness declarations, and rehearsing key testimony points that demonstrate the factual basis for the requested modification. We anticipate likely objections and prepare legal arguments and evidentiary responses to address those concerns. Clear presentation of evidence and legal authority supports the petition and helps the court reach a reasoned decision. Strong preparation reduces the likelihood of surprise and increases the odds of obtaining an order that faithfully reflects the settlor’s intended outcome.
After the court issues an order, it is important to implement the changes correctly in trust administration, update financial accounts, and notify relevant institutions. We assist with preparing conforming documents, advising trustees on distribution steps, and ensuring that account custodians recognize the modified trust terms. If further clarifications or supplemental petitions are needed, we handle those matters to preserve continuity and legal clarity. Proper post-order implementation helps prevent future disputes and ensures the trust functions according to the court-approved changes.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate court asking for judicial authorization to change the terms of an existing trust when private amendment is not feasible or when parties disagree. This petition sets out the specific revisions sought, provides factual support explaining why the change is warranted, and identifies interested parties who must be notified. Courts review petitions to ensure any modification aligns with statutory standards and the settlor’s intent, particularly when changes affect beneficiaries’ rights. A petition becomes necessary in situations such as when beneficiaries contest a proposed amendment, when the trust lacks clear amendment provisions, or when there are concerns about capacity or undue influence at the time of a prior amendment. The judicial route provides a definitive legal determination that can prevent future disputes and ensure the trust operates in accordance with the court-approved terms.
The duration of a trust modification petition varies depending on case complexity, court schedules, and whether the petition is contested. Simple petitions with consent or minimal opposition can resolve in a matter of months, while contested matters involving significant factual disputes or numerous interested parties may take longer. Local probate court calendars and procedural requirements also affect timelines, and cases that require additional evidence or multiple hearings will naturally extend the process. Preparing a thorough petition and complying with notice and filing requirements helps avoid procedural delays. Early communication with interested parties and efforts to resolve issues through negotiation may shorten the timeline. During your initial consultation, we can provide a more tailored estimate based on the trust’s specifics, the number of parties involved, and the documentation available to support the requested modification.
Yes. California law and probate court rules generally require that beneficiaries and other interested parties receive notice of a trust modification petition so they have an opportunity to respond. Proper notice is a fundamental procedural safeguard that allows affected persons to raise objections or present supporting evidence. Failure to provide adequate notice can lead to procedural challenges and may jeopardize the petition’s validity. Notice requirements include identifying all parties with an interest in the trust and serving them according to statutory methods. In some cases, additional or substitute notice procedures may apply if parties cannot be located. Ensuring accurate and timely notice is a critical step in the petition process and is handled carefully to maintain compliance with legal standards.
A trustee generally cannot unilaterally change the dispositive terms of a trust that dictate who receives assets or how distributions are made unless the trust instrument expressly grants that authority. Trustees owe fiduciary duties to beneficiaries and must act within the powers provided by the trust and state law. When a trustee believes change is needed but lacks clear amendment authority, seeking court approval through a petition may be required to ensure any alteration is legally valid. Administrative adjustments related to trust management may be within a trustee’s authority, depending on the trust terms. However, significant changes that affect beneficiaries’ rights or the fundamental distribution plan typically require either the settlor’s action, unanimous beneficiary agreement where permitted, or a court-modified order. Clarifying trustee powers through proper legal channels prevents unauthorized actions and protects all parties involved.
Courts consider a range of evidence when evaluating a trust modification petition, focusing on whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent and meets applicable legal standards. Relevant materials may include the trust document and any prior amendments, contemporaneous notes or communications, financial records, and affidavits or declarations from witnesses. Evidence addressing capacity, lack of coercion, or changed circumstances is often essential, especially when beneficiaries contest the petition. The court also examines whether proper procedural steps were taken, such as providing notice to interested parties and complying with statutory requirements. Clear, organized documentation that explains the factual basis for the requested change and demonstrates how it advances the trust’s purpose strengthens the petition and helps the court reach a reasoned decision.
Alternatives to filing a formal petition include negotiating a private amendment when all interested parties agree, exploring mediation to resolve disputes, or using available trust provisions such as decanting if authorized by the trust and state law. Private amendment can be quicker and less expensive when consensus exists, while mediation offers a structured forum to resolve conflicts without adversarial litigation. Decanting allows a trustee to transfer assets to a new trust with revised terms if the trust grants such authority. However, when parties cannot agree, when the trust lacks amendment authority, or when there are concerns about capacity or undue influence, court intervention may be the most reliable method to secure durable changes. The appropriate route depends on the specific circumstances, the parties’ willingness to cooperate, and the trust’s written provisions.
Costs for a trust modification petition depend on the complexity of the matter, the amount of preparation required, and whether the petition is contested. Expenses typically include attorney time for document review and petition drafting, court filing fees, costs of serving notice, and potential fees for appraisals or expert declarations if needed. Contested proceedings increase costs due to additional motion practice, discovery, and hearings. Every case is different, and a clear scope of work helps estimate likely expenses. We provide clients with an initial assessment that outlines anticipated tasks and associated costs so they can weigh the potential benefits of filing a petition against projected expenses. In some situations, resolving matters through agreement or mediation can significantly reduce overall costs while still addressing the important legal issues at stake.
Modifying a trust can affect tax consequences depending on the nature of the change and the types of assets involved. Certain revisions could alter estate tax exposure, income tax reporting, or the treatment of retirement accounts and life insurance. Courts and trustees may need to consider tax implications when structuring modifications to avoid inadvertent negative outcomes. Consulting with tax counsel or financial advisors in conjunction with the petition can help identify and mitigate potential tax consequences. When proposing modifications that affect tax-sensitive assets, it is prudent to analyze how the changes interact with existing estate and tax planning strategies. Coordinating trust modifications with broader financial plans helps preserve intended tax benefits and prevents unexpected liabilities for beneficiaries or the trust itself.
Yes. A petition can request judicial reformation to correct drafting mistakes or clarify ambiguous language so that the trust reflects the settlor’s actual intent. Reformation is commonly sought when there is evidence that the trust terms do not accurately express the settlor’s objectives due to typographical errors, drafting oversights, or inconsistent provisions. Courts consider extrinsic evidence to determine whether reformation is appropriate and whether it will align the trust with the settlor’s intent. Successful reformation requires a well-documented factual record demonstrating the error and the intended meaning. Presenting clear contemporaneous evidence, such as drafts, correspondence, or witness statements, strengthens the case for judicial correction and helps the court grant the relief necessary to restore the trust’s proper operation.
Bring the original trust document, any amendments or related estate planning documents, account statements for trust assets, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent or the reasons for proposed changes. Identifying beneficiaries, trustees, and successor trustees as well as contact information is also important. Providing a clear chronology of events that led to the desire for modification helps evaluate the strength of a petition and what evidence may be needed. If there are particular disputes or contested issues, bring any communications, medical records, or other documentation that address capacity, undue influence, or changed circumstances. The more documentation available, the more efficiently we can assess options, determine whether a petition is necessary, and prepare a strategy tailored to your goals while respecting procedural requirements.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas