A trust modification petition is a legal request to change the terms or administration of an existing trust when circumstances make the original provisions impractical, unclear, or inconsistent with the settlor’s intent. Many families in North Tustin and Orange County turn to this process when life events, tax considerations, or beneficiary needs evolve. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman helps clients understand whether a petition is appropriate, what evidence is needed, and what the likely timeline looks like. Early planning and clear communication with beneficiaries can reduce conflict and help preserve assets and legacy plans.
Filing a trust modification petition often requires careful documentation, clear legal grounds, and appropriate notice to interested parties. In North Tustin, local courts follow California law and established procedures that affect timing, required filings, and potential hearings. Our approach emphasizes a thorough review of the trust and related documents, thoughtful analysis of available legal options such as Heggstad petitions or trust modification requests, and practical guidance about likely outcomes. Clients benefit from a realistic assessment of costs, timelines, and strategies to resolve disputes while protecting family relationships and intended distributions.
A trust modification petition can address ambiguities, correct drafting mistakes, adapt to family changes, or resolve issues that cannot be fixed informally. When a trust cannot be modified by agreement or the governing document lacks clear amendment procedures, a petition to the court can provide a formal path to clarify terms and ensure the trust is administered as intended. Benefits include securing court-approved instructions for trustees, reducing future litigation risk, and permitting adjustments that align the trust with current tax laws or beneficiary needs. This process can preserve the settlor’s goals and improve certainty for all involved parties.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents clients across California, including North Tustin and greater Orange County, in estate planning and trust litigation matters. The firm focuses on clear, practical representation tailored to each client’s circumstances, whether that involves preparing trust modification petitions, handling Heggstad matters, or assisting with related documents like pour-over wills and powers of attorney. Clients appreciate straightforward communication, careful preparation of filings, and a commitment to resolving disputes efficiently while protecting family relationships and preserving estate objectives.
A trust modification petition asks a court to change a trust when informal amendment is not an option or when the trustee or beneficiaries disagree about the proper course. In California, petitions may be appropriate for correcting errors, addressing ambiguous provisions, removing or replacing a trustee under certain circumstances, or changing distribution rules due to changed financial or family situations. The court evaluates the settlor’s intent, the trust language, and the interests of beneficiaries before granting relief. Clear documentation, witness testimony, and legal grounds are often necessary to support the requested modification.
Certain situations require judicial intervention, such as when a trust was intended to be irrevocable but the settlor’s intent is unclear, when a trustee’s actions are contested, or when third parties have claims that affect administration. Other procedures related to trust disputes include Heggstad petitions, which address whether certain assets pass to the trust even without formal transfer, and petitions to modify or reform a trust to reflect the settlor’s true intent. Understanding the distinctions among these options helps clients choose the most efficient path while complying with California rules for notice and due process.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that seeks authority to change or reinterpret trust terms. The petition explains the legal and factual reasons justifying the change, identifies interested parties, and requests relief such as reformation, modification, or clarification of trust provisions. The court reviews the evidence, including the trust document, communications, and any supporting testimony, to determine whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent or corrects a mistake. Outcomes can include a court order that formally alters the trust, clarifies trustee powers, or resolves competing claims among beneficiaries.
The trust modification process typically begins with a detailed review of the trust and related estate documents, identification of interested parties, and drafting a petition that explains the legal basis for modification. Required elements include an accurate description of the trust, the reasons for the change, and evidence supporting the requested relief. The petition must be served on beneficiaries and other interested persons, who may respond or negotiate a resolution. If parties cannot reach agreement, the court schedules a hearing where evidence is presented and the judge decides whether to grant the modification or other relief.
Familiarity with common terms can make the process easier to navigate. Important concepts include modification, reformation, Heggstad petitions, pour-over wills, trustee duties, and beneficiary rights. Clear definitions help clients understand their options and the likely steps in court. This glossary provides concise explanations that clarify the differences among procedures and how they affect trust administration. Knowing the terminology makes communications with counsel and the court more effective and helps set realistic expectations about timelines, required evidence, and potential outcomes.
A Heggstad petition is a court request to determine whether certain assets that were intended to be part of a trust but were not properly transferred nonetheless pass to the trust for distribution. This procedure examines the settlor’s intent and surrounding circumstances to determine whether title defects or administrative oversights prevent the trust from receiving assets as intended. Heggstad petitions can resolve disputes with banks, transfer agents, or other institutions and help ensure that the trust receives assets that should have been included according to the settlor’s plan.
A trust modification petition requests that a court alter the terms of an existing trust for reasons such as mistake, changed circumstances, or to correct ambiguous language. The petition asks the court to reform or reinterpret provisions to reflect the settlor’s intent or to accommodate new realities while protecting beneficiary interests. The court will consider evidence and legal standards applicable in California before approving any change. A successful petition results in a documented court order that updates how the trust will be administered going forward.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to catch assets that were not transferred into a trust during the settlor’s lifetime and direct them into the trust at death. It operates as a backup to ensure a settlor’s property ultimately becomes part of the trust estate for distribution according to the trust terms. While it helps consolidate asset distribution, assets passing through a pour-over will may still be subject to probate before they can be transferred to the trust, so coordinating trust funding with other estate planning documents remains important.
A certification of trust is a shortened summary of trust terms used to provide third parties with key information without revealing the entire trust document. It typically includes the name of the trust, the identity of the trustee, the trustee’s powers, and the trust’s existence and date. Financial institutions and title companies often accept a certification of trust to verify authority for transactions without requiring full disclosure of sensitive trust provisions, which can simplify administration while protecting privacy.
When a trust needs to change, parties can sometimes rely on informal agreements or written amendments if the trust allows and beneficiaries agree. Where that is not possible, filing a petition in court provides a formal remedy. The right choice depends on the trust’s terms, the nature of the dispute, and whether beneficiaries or trustees are cooperative. Informal solutions are often quicker and less expensive when all parties agree, but court petitions offer finality and enforceable orders when agreement cannot be reached or when legal uncertainties must be resolved by a judge.
If a trust includes explicit amendment or revocation provisions and the settlor is available to sign changes, an informal amendment may be appropriate. Similarly, if all adult beneficiaries and the trustee agree to a proposed change in writing and the trust’s terms allow for such agreement, parties can often avoid court involvement. This route can be faster and less expensive, and it preserves privacy by keeping the matter out of public court records. Documentation of any agreement and careful updating of records are important to prevent future disputes.
When beneficiaries are in agreement and there are no creditor claims or competing interests, a consensual approach to modify or clarify trust provisions can work well. Parties can execute amendments, restatements, or agreements that reflect the new terms, often with assistance to ensure legal formalities are met. This cooperative path reduces cost and delay and keeps family matters private. However, it is important to document the basis for changes and ensure that notices and signatures comply with California law to reduce the chance of later challenges.
Certain trusts are drafted as irrevocable or contain provisions that are ambiguous or internally inconsistent, which may necessitate court involvement to interpret or reform the document. When a trustee or beneficiaries dispute the meaning of terms, or when the trust’s operation produces inequitable results, a petition provides a mechanism to obtain a binding judicial interpretation. The court can issue orders that clarify trustee authority, reallocate assets, or reform the trust to reflect the settlor’s intended plan, ensuring administration proceeds under a clear legal mandate.
When beneficiaries or third parties bring competing claims, or when questions arise about a trustee’s actions or qualifications, the protections of a formal court process can be necessary. Judicial oversight enables discovery, examination of evidence, and enforceable rulings to address breach of fiduciary duty, removal of a trustee, or redistribution of trust assets. While litigation can involve time and expense, it provides a structured forum to resolve contested issues and to obtain orders that enforce rights and duties under California trust and probate law.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification seeks to address immediate problems and potential future disputes to provide durable solutions. By thoroughly reviewing the trust, related estate planning documents, and the circumstances leading to the requested change, counsel can design a petition or settlement that reduces ambiguity and limits opportunities for later challenges. Comprehensive preparation, including clear pleadings and supporting evidence, increases the likelihood of a favorable and enforceable court order, which protects beneficiaries and clarifies trustee obligations for the long term.
Taking a holistic view also identifies related items that may need attention, such as updating pour-over wills, financial powers of attorney, healthcare directives, or trust certifications. Addressing these elements in tandem helps ensure that asset transfer, beneficiary designations, and administrative processes work together as intended. A well-planned approach can minimize the need for repeated court filings, lower the risk of unintended tax consequences, and provide families with a clearer, more stable plan for trust administration moving forward.
Resolving ambiguities and obtaining clear court orders reduces the likelihood that beneficiaries will face conflicting interpretations or competing claims down the road. By addressing potential procedural and substantive issues now, parties can avoid repeated litigation and the stress of ongoing disputes. A comprehensive strategy includes clear documentation, proper notice to interested parties, and careful drafting of any resulting court order to ensure enforceability. This proactive approach helps families preserve relationships and provides trustees with direction to carry out the settlor’s intentions consistently.
When legal authority or clarity is required, securing a court order ensures that the relief obtained is binding and enforceable. This can be particularly important where banks, title companies, or third parties require proof of authority to transfer assets. Court approval also protects trustees and beneficiaries by providing documented directives that reduce personal liability risk. A thorough presentation of facts and law to the court increases the likelihood that the requested modification will be recognized by institutions and will withstand later challenges.
Collecting the trust instrument, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, certificates of trust, account statements, and communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent is essential. Records such as bank account statements, transfer documents, and correspondence with trustees or financial institutions help establish the factual foundation for a petition. Having organized documentation reduces delays, enables a focused review of legal options, and strengthens the ability to present a persuasive petition or negotiate a resolution with other interested parties without unnecessary discovery disputes.
Evaluate how a proposed modification interacts with taxation, retirement plans, beneficiary designations, and estate administration to avoid unintended consequences. Timing matters when litigation could affect funding deadlines, distributions, or creditor claims. Understanding likely costs and timelines helps families make informed decisions about pursuing a court petition versus cooperative solutions. Reviewing ancillary documents like pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives ensures that any trust changes fit within the broader estate plan and do not create inconsistencies that could prompt further disputes.
Families consider trust modification petitions for a variety of reasons including changes in family relationships, incapacity of a trustee, errors in drafting, changes in tax law, or when the trust no longer reflects the settlor’s wishes. Seeking court approval can clarify ambiguous language, adjust distribution mechanics, or provide authority for trustees to take necessary actions. In many situations, obtaining a formal order prevents future uncertainty and aligns administration with the settlor’s latest intent, which can be particularly important when significant assets or complex beneficiary needs are involved.
Another common reason to pursue a petition is when third parties such as financial institutions require judicial instructions before transferring assets to or from a trust. Where beneficiaries dispute the trust’s interpretation or assert competing claims, a court decision can resolve conflicts and preserve estate value. Additionally, when trust funding was incomplete or assets were left out unintentionally, procedures like Heggstad petitions or pour-over will coordination may be necessary. Taking appropriate steps early reduces the likelihood of protracted disputes and helps protect the settlor’s intentions.
Typical circumstances include changes in family dynamics such as births, deaths, divorce, or remarriage, trustee incapacitation or misconduct, discovery of drafting errors, or the need to adapt to new tax rules or asset types. Financial institutions may also require judicial clarification when titles do not match trust provisions. In other cases, a settlor’s later oral statements or evidence suggest the trust does not reflect their true intent, prompting a petition to reform the document. Each scenario requires careful factual development and legal analysis to choose the best path forward.
Life events such as births, deaths, marriages, divorces, or changes in financial needs can render trust provisions outdated or impractical. Adjustments may be needed to provide for new beneficiaries, modify distributions, or protect assets in light of changed circumstances. Where all parties agree, amendments can address these needs; when disagreement or ambiguity exists, a petition may be necessary to secure a binding resolution. The goal is to align trust administration with current realities while respecting the settlor’s underlying goals and priorities.
Trust documents may contain typographical mistakes, conflicting clauses, or unclear language that affects how assets are distributed or how trustees exercise their powers. When a drafting error has the potential to frustrate the settlor’s intent or create competing beneficiary claims, a petition to reform or clarify the trust can provide a judicial remedy. Identifying the precise nature of the ambiguity and presenting persuasive evidence of intended meaning helps the court correct the document so it functions as intended.
Problems may arise when a trustee fails to act, acts improperly, or lacks the ability to manage trust assets effectively. Beneficiaries may seek modification to remove or replace a trustee, to clarify trustee duties, or to obtain instructions for administration. When internal resolution is not possible, a court petition can provide orders that protect beneficiaries’ interests and direct trustees on proper steps. Addressing these issues promptly can prevent asset depletion and ensure trust administration moves forward in compliance with the settlor’s intentions.
We provide dedicated guidance to clients in North Tustin and Orange County who are facing trust interpretation issues, trustee disputes, or the need for formal modification. Our office assists with preparing petitions, coordinating required notices, and presenting evidence to the court. We also help with related documents including pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and powers of attorney to ensure a consistent estate plan. For an initial consultation or to discuss next steps, call our office at 408-528-2827 to schedule a focused review of your situation and options.
Clients choose our firm for clear communication, careful preparation, and practical solutions tailored to family and financial realities. We focus on assessing the trust documents, identifying likely legal paths such as reformation or Heggstad petitions, and advising clients on timelines and likely outcomes. Our goal is to resolve issues efficiently while protecting the settlor’s intent and minimizing disruption to beneficiaries. We work to keep clients informed throughout the process and to pursue the most appropriate resolution for each situation.
Our approach emphasizes detailed case preparation, meaningful communication with interested parties, and thorough documentation to support petitions or settlements. We assist with coordinating necessary notices, gathering supporting evidence, and presenting a clear factual narrative to the court when judicial relief is required. By anticipating potential objections and addressing legal and practical concerns up front, we aim to reduce the likelihood of prolonged litigation and to secure an outcome that is durable and enforceable.
We also help clients address ancillary estate planning tasks that often accompany trust modifications, such as updating pour-over wills, certifying trust documents for institutions, and ensuring powers of attorney and healthcare directives align with updated trust provisions. Addressing these related documents together creates a cohesive plan that supports seamless administration and reduces future complications. Clients benefit from coordinated guidance that aligns trust changes with broader estate planning goals and practical needs.
Our process begins with a focused intake and detailed review of the trust document and related materials. We identify the legal basis for relief, outline likely timelines and costs, and recommend the most appropriate approach whether that is negotiation, an uncontested amendment, or a court petition. When litigation is required, we prepare a thorough petition, coordinate service and notices to interested parties, and pursue resolution through mediation or court hearings as needed. Throughout, we emphasize clear communication to keep clients informed.
The initial phase focuses on compiling the trust, amendments, wills, account records, correspondence, and any documents that evidence the settlor’s intent. We interview clients and interested parties to understand objectives and potential obstacles. Based on that review, we recommend a strategy that may include negotiation, drafting amendments, or preparing a petition for court resolution. The goal is to identify the most effective route while minimizing cost and time, and to ensure that all necessary documentation and witnesses are prepared to support the chosen approach.
Gathering complete and accurate documents is critical to any trust modification matter. We assist clients in locating trust instruments, amendments, account statements, deeds, wills, and relevant correspondence. This phase includes assessing who must be notified, identifying potential claimants, and deciding which records will support a petition or settlement. A careful assessment helps prioritize issues, clarifies the evidence needed for court proceedings, and informs cost projections and expected timelines, allowing clients to make informed choices about next steps.
In the initial consultation we set expectations, discuss objectives, and map out a notice plan to ensure compliance with California requirements. We advise on who qualifies as an interested person, what notices are necessary, and how to engage beneficiaries in discussions to explore resolution possibilities. Proper notice and early engagement can lead to settlements that avoid court hearings. When litigation is necessary, the initial planning phase ensures that notices, pleadings, and evidence are coordinated and ready for filing.
This phase involves preparing the petition that sets forth the factual basis and legal authority for the requested modification. The petition must clearly identify the trust, the relief sought, and the interested parties. After filing, proper service of the petition and related documents is required so that beneficiaries and other interested persons have an opportunity to respond. We also pursue settlement discussions where feasible to narrow issues or resolve matters without a contested hearing.
Preparing the filing includes drafting a clear petition, compiling declarations, attaching the trust and supporting documents, and organizing exhibits that demonstrate the settlor’s intent or the existence of a mistake. Witness declarations and documentary evidence are critical to persuade a judge when judicial relief is sought. Properly organized filings help the court understand the issues and often influence whether the matter can be resolved by agreement or requires a hearing to decide contested questions.
After filing, the petition must be served on all required parties under California rules. Interested persons have an opportunity to respond, and that exchange often frames the scope of contested issues. Many matters resolve through negotiation or mediation, and we pursue those options where appropriate to save time and cost. When settlement is not possible, the pleadings and responses define the issues for a court hearing where evidence and legal arguments will determine the outcome.
If the court grants the petition or approves a settlement, the next step is implementing the court order and updating trust records and related documents. That may include preparing amended trust instruments, notifying financial institutions, and transferring assets as directed. Implementation ensures that institutions accept the new authority and that the trust administration proceeds according to the updated terms. Proper follow-up avoids confusion and ensures that distributions and trustee actions align with the newly established directives.
Court hearings allow presentation of evidence and witness testimony to support the petition. The judge issues an order based on the record, which may reform or clarify trust provisions, direct a trustee to take specific actions, or provide other remedies. A formal court order provides enforceable authority that third parties can rely upon when transferring assets or accepting trustee instructions. Ensuring that orders are precise and enforceable is key to avoiding future disputes or implementation problems.
After obtaining an order, it is important to update the trust document file, create an amended or restated trust if required, and provide certifications or court orders to banks, brokerages, and title companies. Institutions often require specific documentation to accept changes or to transfer assets, so preparing clear records and certifications streamlines administration. Providing accurate documents and assisting trustees with the implementation steps ensures the court’s directives are followed and assets are handled in accordance with the updated plan.
Many common situations prompt a trust modification petition, including ambiguous or conflicting trust provisions, changes in family circumstances such as divorce or death, trustee incapacity or misconduct, and unintended omissions in funding the trust. When a trust’s terms no longer reflect the settlor’s intent or when parties cannot reach agreement on how to proceed, a petition provides a formal mechanism for the court to resolve the issue and issue enforceable orders to guide administration. This helps prevent ongoing disputes and clarifies future distribution and trustee duties. Another frequent reason is when assets that should belong to the trust were not properly retitled, creating uncertainty about ownership and distribution. In such cases, procedures like Heggstad petitions address whether those assets are treated as trust property despite administrative defects. Petitioning the court can also rectify typographical mistakes or reallocate trust shares where necessary to reflect the settlor’s true intentions, providing finality and legal certainty for all interested parties.
A Heggstad petition specifically seeks a judicial determination that certain assets which were intended to be part of a trust nevertheless pass to the trust despite imperfect title or transfer formalities. It focuses on ownership of particular assets and whether they should be treated as trust property. By contrast, a trust modification petition seeks to alter, reform, or clarify the terms of the trust itself, often for reasons such as mistake, changed circumstances, or the need to correct ambiguous language. Both procedures involve filing with the court and providing notice to interested persons, but they address different legal questions. A Heggstad petition resolves asset ownership problems, while a modification or reformation petition changes how the trust operates or how distributions are determined. The proper choice depends on the underlying issue, and sometimes both types of relief are pursued in the same matter to achieve a comprehensive resolution.
Yes, beneficiaries can sometimes agree to change a trust without court intervention if the trust’s terms allow for amendment or if all interested parties sign a written agreement to modify the trust. When the settlor is alive and the trust contains explicit amendment provisions, changes can often be made through formal amendments or restatements executed according to the trust’s requirements. When all beneficiaries are adults and there are no competing claims, a consensual approach can be efficient and preserves privacy by avoiding public filings. However, when the trust is irrevocable, when all interested persons cannot agree, or when third parties such as creditors or financial institutions require judicial instructions, court involvement may be necessary. In those situations, a petition provides enforceable orders and resolves disputes that cannot be settled informally. Careful documentation of any agreement is essential to prevent later challenges and to ensure that institutions recognize the changes.
To support a petition to modify or reform a trust, important evidence can include the original trust and any amendments, correspondence or memos reflecting the settlor’s intent, declarations from witnesses, and financial records showing intended transfers. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent is often central, so affidavits, emails, letters, or testimony that clarify what the settlor intended can be persuasive. Documentary evidence that shows errors or inconsistencies in the drafting also supports reformation requests. Additional evidence might include transaction documents, bank statements, deeds, or other proof that assets were meant to be part of the trust. Expert opinion testimony is sometimes used to explain technical issues, and careful organization of exhibits helps the court understand the factual narrative. Properly presenting these materials, with clear declarations and chronology, increases the chance of obtaining the requested relief from the court.
Timing for a trust modification petition varies depending on complexity, court schedules, and whether parties reach a settlement. Simple uncontested petitions or cases resolved by agreement can be handled more quickly, sometimes within a few months. Contested matters that require discovery, multiple hearings, or substantial evidence often take longer, potentially many months to over a year, depending on the scope of issues and court availability. Planning for potential delays and gathering documents early helps streamline the process. Local court procedures and the need for mediation or settlement conferences can also affect timing. Engaging in early negotiation and clear communication with interested persons can shorten timelines by narrowing contentious issues. When a matter must proceed to hearing, thorough preparation of declarations and exhibits helps present the case efficiently and reduce the need for repeated continuances.
While a petition is pending, trustees generally remain responsible for managing trust assets prudently and in accordance with existing trust terms unless the court orders otherwise. Beneficiaries retain their rights but may be limited by temporary orders if the court issues protective measures such as injunctions to preserve assets. Parties should avoid unilateral actions that could prejudice the court’s ability to resolve the dispute and should provide requested documentation and cooperation in the litigation process. If a trustee’s conduct is in question, interested parties can request the court to impose temporary directives, appoint a neutral third party, or take other steps to protect trust assets during the dispute. Open communication and adherence to court rules and deadlines are important to maintain proper administration and to present a strong record when the matter is decided.
Yes, court orders resulting from trust modification petitions are generally enforceable and accepted by banks, brokerages, and title companies when properly presented. Financial institutions often require certified copies of the court order or a certification of trust reflecting the court’s directives before they will transfer assets or recognize new trustee authority. A clear, well-drafted order makes it easier for institutions to comply and reduces the likelihood of additional requests for documentation. To ensure smooth implementation, it is important to provide institutions with the exact documentation they require and to assist trustees in making the necessary changes to account registrations, deeds, and beneficiary records. Coordinating with institutions ahead of time and anticipating their requirements helps translate judicial relief into practical changes in asset custody and control.
Yes, court filings and hearings in trust modification matters typically become part of the public record, which is why some parties prefer to resolve matters through private agreements when possible. Public records can include the petition, supporting declarations, and the court order. If privacy is a concern, parties may explore settlement options or ask the court to seal sensitive documents in exceptional circumstances, though sealing is not guaranteed and requires a separate showing to the court. Even when filings are public, it is often possible to limit the information disclosed by submitting redacted documents where appropriate or by structuring settlements to avoid unnecessary disclosure. Discussing privacy concerns early helps identify strategies that reduce public exposure while achieving the desired outcome for trust administration.
Yes, a petition can address drafting mistakes made years earlier if evidence supports that a provision does not reflect the settlor’s actual intent or contains errors that frustrate the purpose of the trust. Courts can reform documents to correct mistakes or clarify ambiguous provisions when there is persuasive evidence of the settlor’s intended meaning. Presenting contemporaneous communications, witness declarations, or other documentary evidence that shows the settlor’s intent strengthens a petition to reform the trust. Longstanding practices by trustees or beneficiary conduct can also be relevant to the court’s understanding of how the trust was intended to operate. Even when significant time has passed, a well-documented factual record can convince a judge that reformation or clarification is warranted to align the trust with its intended purpose.
Costs associated with a trust modification petition vary based on complexity, the need for discovery, the number of interested parties, and whether settlement is possible. Simple, uncontested matters typically involve lower attorney fees and court costs, while contested litigation requires more time for drafting pleadings, preparing declarations, conducting discovery, and attending hearings, which increases expense. Expected costs should be discussed during an initial consultation to set realistic expectations and consider alternative resolution paths. Many clients find that early negotiation and focused preparation reduce overall costs by narrowing disputed issues and avoiding extended litigation. In some cases, the court may award fees or allocate costs depending on the circumstances, but parties should plan for the likely expenses associated with filing fees, service costs, and legal representation when deciding how to proceed.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas