A Heggstad petition can be an effective legal pathway when a trust appears not to have received assets that should have been transferred into it at the settlor’s death. This page explains how a Heggstad petition works for residents of Northwood and the surrounding Orange County communities, what steps are involved, and how our office approaches these matters. We aim to clarify when a petition is appropriate, the types of evidence commonly used, and what the petition can achieve for trustees, beneficiaries, and family members seeking to correct or enforce a trust transfer. Practical information is presented with clear next steps.
Navigating claims that property should have been in a trust requires careful review of documents, account activity, and the circumstances of transfer or retention. A Heggstad petition is typically used to ask a court to recognize that property belonging to a decedent was intended to pass to a trust despite not being formally retitled. This guide provides an overview of how a petition is prepared, what proof may be persuasive to a judge, and common outcomes that resolve disputes without protracted litigation. The goal is to inform Northwood residents so they can make sound decisions about protecting trust intentions.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the settlor’s intended distribution plan and help avoid the delays, costs, and public exposure that can come with probate. When a decedent’s assets were meant to be governed by a trust but were left in the decedent’s name, a petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s ownership. This legal route can return assets to trust management, uphold beneficiary expectations, and simplify estate settlement. In many cases a successful petition reduces conflict among heirs, clarifies title for banks and other institutions, and restores the efficient administration of the estate according to the trust instrument.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represent clients in estate planning and trust administration matters with focused attention to detail and client service. Our approach emphasizes a thorough document review, careful collection of transactional evidence, and tailored strategy for resolving trust transfer disputes through negotiation or court proceedings when necessary. We work to explain options clearly and develop persuasive filings that address the factual and legal elements required for a Heggstad petition. Clients in Northwood and throughout California receive responsive communication and practical guidance at each stage of the process.
A Heggstad petition is a legal claim filed in probate court that seeks a judicial determination that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the decedent’s name at death. The petition typically includes factual evidence showing the decedent intended for the asset to be placed in the trust, such as trust provisions, transfer instructions, bank or brokerage transfers, beneficiary designations, and correspondence. The petition must show a clear connection between the decedent’s intent and the property at issue. Understanding the elements that courts consider helps beneficiaries and trustees prepare a persuasive case.
The court will evaluate whether the decedent manifested the intention that the property be part of the trust and whether any act or transaction occurred that supports that intention. This may involve examining deeds, beneficiary forms, account statements, and testimony from witnesses who were involved in trust funding or financial management. If the court finds in favor of the petitioner, the asset may be declared trust property and administered under the trust’s terms, avoiding probate for that asset. Knowing typical evidentiary requirements and procedural steps can improve prospects for a favorable result.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain assets should be distributed according to a trust even though title was not formally transferred before the settlor’s death. The petition relies on legal principles that respect the settlor’s intent when there is sufficient proof of an intent to fund the trust. Often referred to by practitioners as a remedy to give effect to trust terms, the petition addresses administrative gaps where assets were overlooked or could not be retitled. The court’s role is to determine ownership for estate administration consistent with evidence of intent.
Successful petitions generally include a clear statement of the trust terms, documentation showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, evidence of ownership or control over the asset at death, and any communications that support transfer intentions. The filing process requires careful preparation of pleadings, service on interested parties, and often an evidentiary hearing if the matter is contested. Courts weigh both documentary evidence and witness testimony. Preparing a petition with a well-organized factual narrative and supporting exhibits increases the chance of a judicial ruling that aligns property ownership with the trust.
This glossary defines common terms encountered in trust funding and Heggstad petitions. Understanding these terms helps clients follow the process and communicate effectively with trustees, attorneys, and the court. Entries cover concepts such as trust, settlor, beneficiary, probate, funding, title, and petition, each explained with practical examples. Clear definitions reduce confusion about roles and expectations during administration and litigation, and they help parties identify what documentation and proof may be required to support a petition or other trust-related filing.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a person known as the settlor transfers property to be managed by a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries according to the trust’s terms. Trusts can be revocable or irrevocable, and they set out how assets are to be managed, distributed, and protected. Trusts are commonly used to avoid probate, provide privacy, and specify detailed distribution plans. Trust documentation typically includes the trust instrument and any amendments, which are central to determining how disputed assets should be administered.
Funding refers to the process of transferring ownership or beneficiary designation of assets into a trust so that the trust controls those assets upon the settlor’s incapacity or death. Funding can involve changing titles on real property, reassigning bank and brokerage accounts, or naming the trust as beneficiary on retirement accounts and insurance policies. Proper funding ensures assets pass under the trust’s terms and can prevent assets from going through probate. When funding is incomplete, a Heggstad petition may be necessary to correct the record and honor the settlor’s intended distributions.
The settlor is the person who creates the trust and transfers assets into it by executing the trust document. The settlor’s intent, as expressed in the trust instrument and supporting evidence, is the primary consideration when courts evaluate whether assets should be treated as belonging to the trust. Evidence of intent can include the trust terms, declarations made by the settlor, transfer instructions, and financial records. Establishing the settlor’s intent is often central to the success of a Heggstad petition when property appears outside the trust at the time of death.
Probate is the public court process for administering a decedent’s estate and transferring property that is titled in the decedent’s name at death. Probate includes validating wills, paying debts and taxes, and distributing remaining assets to heirs or beneficiaries. Trust administration can avoid probate for assets properly funded into a trust. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial ruling that certain property should be treated as trust property, thereby removing it from probate administration and allowing distribution according to the trust terms instead of probate processes.
When assets are not properly titled in a trust, there are several avenues to consider, including probate administration, informal settlement among heirs, or filing a Heggstad petition. Probate can be costly and public, while a petition seeks to align property ownership with the trust privately where possible. Informal resolution may work when parties agree, but a petition provides a formal court determination when disputes arise. The right choice depends on case specifics: the strength of evidence of intent, the willingness of involved parties to cooperate, and the value or importance of the asset at issue.
A limited approach may suffice when the untransferred asset is of modest value and paperwork clearly shows the settlor intended the trust to own the asset. In those situations, informal communications or cooperation with custodial institutions can resolve title issues without court involvement. Banks and title companies sometimes accept documentation that demonstrates intent and will retitle assets accordingly. Parties often prefer this route because it is less costly and faster than litigation, as long as all interested individuals agree and the evidence is convincing to the institution holding the asset.
When beneficiaries and trustees are in agreement about the intended disposition of an asset, the parties can often take cooperative steps to transfer title or update beneficiary designations to reflect the trust. Documentation such as written statements, notarized affidavits, and proof of prior dealings can support such transfers. Cooperation reduces cost and time, and can maintain family harmony by avoiding contested court proceedings. However, if any party objects or if institutions decline to act without a court determination, a Heggstad petition may become necessary.
A comprehensive legal strategy is often needed when trust funding disputes involve significant assets, conflicting evidence, or contested accounts from heirs and trustees. In these situations, preparing a Heggstad petition requires compiling a persuasive record, anticipating counterarguments, and being prepared for hearings. Gathering transactional evidence, locating witnesses, and drafting clear legal arguments are part of a robust approach that aims to protect the trust’s intent and obtain a favorable ruling. Strong preparation can reduce the risk of litigation delays and unexpected outcomes.
Sometimes banks, title companies, or government agencies will resist retitling assets without a court order, especially where records are incomplete or ambiguous. Addressing institutional resistance requires legal filings and the presentation of convincing proof in court. A comprehensive approach anticipates such hurdles by securing documentary evidence, preparing declarations, and presenting a coherent timeline of events. When title defects or competing claims exist, a well-organized legal strategy improves the likelihood that the court will find in favor of treating the asset as trust property.
A comprehensive approach to trust funding disputes combines careful factual investigation with effective legal advocacy to increase the odds of a successful court determination. This includes thorough document collection, detailed witness preparation, and a clear presentation of the trust’s terms and transfer history. The benefits include a stronger evidentiary record, clearer communication with courts and institutions, and better protection of beneficiary rights. Taking a full-scope view can also reveal alternative resolution paths, allowing for settlement discussions grounded in the factual record, which can save time and resources over contested litigation.
Another benefit of comprehensive representation is risk management: by identifying potential weaknesses early, counsel can prepare responses and mitigation strategies that reduce surprises at hearing. This approach supports efficient case management, helps set realistic expectations, and ensures that filings conform to court requirements to avoid procedural delays. Comprehensive preparation also helps trustees and beneficiaries understand the process and their roles, fostering informed decisions and better collaboration where possible, which contributes to faster and more durable resolutions.
Compiling and organizing documents, witness statements, and transactional histories creates a compelling evidentiary record for the court. A persuasive presentation explains the settlor’s intent, reconciles discrepancies, and addresses opposing arguments proactively. This level of preparation helps judges understand why an asset should be recognized as trust property and can lead to more decisive rulings. Clear exhibits and chronologies reduce confusion and make it easier for the court to apply legal standards to the facts presented, improving the odds of an outcome that reflects the settlor’s plan.
Resolving funding disputes thoroughly minimizes the chance that remaining questions will spark additional litigation later. A court decision that is supported by a robust record tends to be more durable and less vulnerable to attack. Comprehensive resolution also clarifies titles and account ownership, making it easier for trustees to administer assets without recurring disputes. By addressing both legal and factual issues, clients can achieve finality, protect beneficiary expectations, and preserve estate assets that would otherwise be consumed by ongoing conflict and expense.
Gathering all relevant documents at the outset can make the difference when preparing a Heggstad petition. Useful materials include the trust instrument and amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, correspondence that references transfers or trust intentions, and prior tax returns or trust funding lists. Early collection allows time to obtain certified copies, trace transactions, and identify witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent. A complete and organized evidence file supports persuasive pleadings and reduces delays caused by missing records during the court process.
Creating a detailed timeline of events and obtaining written statements from witnesses who observed the settlor’s intent or were involved in asset transfers strengthens a petition. Witnesses might include family members, financial advisors, attorneys, or bank personnel. Signed declarations explaining conversations, instructions given by the settlor, or steps taken to fund the trust can corroborate documentary evidence. Combining a clear chronology with contemporaneous records helps present a coherent narrative to the court, making it easier to explain why an asset should be considered trust property.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when assets that were meant to be governed by a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name or lack formal transfer documents. The petition can clarify ownership, return assets to the trust, and honor the settlor’s intended distribution plan. It is particularly appropriate when probate would otherwise be necessary, when there is disagreement among heirs about asset ownership, or when institutions decline to retitle property without a court order. Seeking a judicial determination can provide certainty and preserve the trust’s privacy and administration framework.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to avoid the additional time and expense that probate can impose on an estate administration. When evidence supports the settlor’s intent, a favorable ruling transfers assets to trust administration and may allow for faster, more private settlement according to the trust’s terms. Filing a petition also protects trustees and beneficiaries by clarifying who holds authority over particular assets, reducing the risk of improper distributions or creditor claims arising from ambiguity in ownership at the time of death.
Typical circumstances include real estate that was never retitled into the trust, financial accounts left in the decedent’s personal name, retirement or insurance proceeds with conflicting beneficiary designations, and cases where the settlor instructed transfers but the paperwork was incomplete. Estate transitions, sudden illness, or changes in advisors can leave assets unfunded. These scenarios often prompt beneficiaries or trustees to seek a court determination that the asset belonged in the trust, enabling administration under the trust terms rather than probate or intestacy rules.
Real estate intended to be trust property but still titled in the decedent’s name is a frequent issue. Deeds may have been overlooked or not recorded, or the owner may have lacked time to complete paperwork. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare the property as belonging to the trust based on evidence such as the trust document, transfer instructions, and correspondence. Achieving a judicial declaration helps provide clear title for buyers, lenders, or title companies and enables the trustee to manage or distribute the property according to the trust.
Accounts such as checking, savings, or brokerage accounts sometimes remain in the decedent’s individual name rather than the trust. Statements, transfer records, or account-holder instructions can support a petition showing the settlor intended those funds to be trust assets. Resolving ownership through a petition allows the trustee to access funds for debt payment or distribution and avoids the need to open probate estate accounts. It also reduces delays in administering bills and taxes that depend on timely access to funds.
Retirement accounts and life insurance policies with inconsistent or outdated beneficiary designations may lead to disputes about whether proceeds should pass under the trust or directly to named beneficiaries. When the settlor’s intent favors trust distribution but paperwork differs, a Heggstad petition can provide a court ruling to reconcile the discrepancy. The petition will consider the trust terms, any designation forms, and communications indicating the settlor’s wishes, and a favorable ruling can ensure proceeds are handled according to the broader estate plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist Northwood residents and nearby communities with trust funding issues, Heggstad petitions, and related estate administration matters. We focus on identifying the documentation needed to support a petition, communicating with institutions that control assets, and seeking efficient resolutions that reflect the settlor’s intentions. Clients receive clear guidance on likely paths forward, possible outcomes, and practical steps to preserve assets and minimize delay. We are available to review your situation and explain potential remedies tailored to your circumstances.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we offer focused legal representation in estate planning and trust administration matters. We prioritize detailed investigation of the factual record, careful preparation of court filings, and proactive communication with all parties involved. Our goal is to secure a result that aligns with the settlor’s expressed intentions while managing costs and timelines. We work to identify the most efficient path to resolution, whether through negotiation with institutions or through court proceedings when necessary.
When proceedings are required, our approach emphasizes clear organization of evidence and presentation of a coherent legal narrative. This includes drafting a petition that explains the relevant trust provisions, demonstrating the settlor’s intent with supporting documents, and preparing witness statements where helpful. We also assist trustees in understanding their duties and help beneficiaries know what to expect during the process. Our practice is built on responsive client service, careful case management, and practical legal solutions for estate and trust issues.
We work with clients throughout California and maintain familiarity with local probate court practices and institutional procedures so that each matter proceeds as smoothly as possible. From initial evaluation and evidence collection through filing and hearings, we provide guidance about timelines, likely obstacles, and options for resolving disputes. Our goal is to achieve a definitive resolution that protects the trust’s aims while reducing the emotional and financial strain commonly associated with estate disputes.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document and any potentially relevant records to assess whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We identify the assets at issue, gather supporting documentation, and prepare a timeline and witness statements to support the settlor’s intent. If filing is required, we draft and submit the petition, serve interested parties, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we communicate with institutions and opposing parties to explore settlement opportunities and work toward an efficient resolution that honors the trust’s directives.
The first step is a comprehensive intake to identify the asset or assets at issue and collect all relevant documents. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, transfer records, beneficiary forms, and any written or electronic communications indicating intent. We also interview potential witnesses who can attest to conversations or transactions. Building a complete factual record is crucial to determine whether a petition is likely to succeed and to shape the strategy for court filings or institutional requests.
Reviewing the trust and related documents is essential to understand the settlor’s direction and identify provisions that support the case. We analyze the trust terms, amendments, and any recorded declarations to see how the trust contemplates ownership and distribution. The review also uncovers any potential conflicts or ambiguities that the petition must address. A detailed document analysis helps form the narrative presented to the court and identifies which records will be most persuasive when seeking recognition of trust ownership.
We gather transaction histories, account statements, transfer receipts, and other records that demonstrate how the settlor managed or intended to manage the asset. This might involve contacting financial institutions for historical records, obtaining certified copies of deeds, and assembling correspondence that reflects intent. Establishing a clear timeline of events and transactions supports the petition by showing a pattern of behavior consistent with funding the trust, which can be central to persuading the court to recognize trust ownership.
Once the factual record is assembled, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, organizing exhibits to present a coherent narrative of the settlor’s intent and the asset’s history. The filing includes legal arguments tailored to local court requirements and the particular facts of the case. After filing, the petition must be served on interested parties, and we manage communications with those parties, including creditors or institutions that hold the asset. The goal is to present a clear and thorough submission to the court.
Drafting involves assembling a clear explanation of the trust terms, summarizing the evidence, and attaching supporting exhibits such as deeds, statements, and witness declarations. We focus on creating an organized filing that the court can follow easily, with exhibits referenced in chronological order to support key factual points. This attention to structure helps judges assess the evidence more efficiently and reduces the risk of procedural objections or requests for clarification that could delay resolution.
After filing, proper service on all interested parties is essential. We ensure notices and pleadings are delivered in accordance with court rules and respond to any objections or petitions filed by others. If disputes arise, we evaluate settlement possibilities and prepare for hearings. Clear communication and early attention to objections often narrow contested issues and help focus the court’s attention on the most important questions about intent and ownership, which can streamline the resolution process.
If the matter goes to hearing, we present the evidence, call or submit witness declarations, and make legal arguments in support of the petition. The court may rule immediately or take time to consider the record. If the ruling recognizes trust ownership, we assist with implementing the decision, which may include updating titles, instructing institutions, and communicating the outcome to beneficiaries. If the ruling is unfavorable or partial, we discuss next steps and potential appellate or settlement options where appropriate.
At hearing, the presentation focuses on a clear timeline, corroborating documents, and witness testimony that collectively demonstrate the settlor’s intent. We highlight key facts that support adjudication in favor of trust ownership, anticipate counterarguments, and explain how the law applies to the record. Effective presentation at hearing helps the court resolve factual uncertainties and reach a decision that aligns with the settlor’s expressed wishes and the trust instrument’s provisions.
Following a favorable ruling, we assist with the practical steps required to transfer title or instruct institutions to treat the asset as trust property. This may include obtaining certified orders, recording deeds, updating account registrations, and coordinating with trustees to administer or distribute assets. Ensuring that the court’s order is properly executed prevents future disputes and clarifies authority for third parties such as banks, title companies, and purchasers. Clear implementation closes the loop on the dispute and enables efficient trust administration.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that seeks a judicial determination that certain property should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the decedent’s name at death. It is used when there is evidence showing the settlor intended to fund the trust but the formal transfer was not completed. The petition asks the court to give effect to the settlor’s intent so the asset can be administered under the trust, avoiding probate for that particular asset. This remedy respects the trust’s terms when sufficient proof of intent exists. The petition typically details the trust provisions, the nature of the assets, and the factual circumstances that support the claim that the asset belonged to the trust. It may include deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, correspondence, and witness declarations. The court weighs this evidence to determine whether the asset should be recognized as trust property. A successful petition clarifies ownership, enabling trustees to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust’s instructions rather than through probate proceedings.
Evidence commonly relied upon includes the trust document and any amendments, deeds showing transfer instructions, account statements that indicate transactions consistent with funding, beneficiary designation forms, and written communications that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. Declarations from witnesses who can attest to conversations or actions taken by the settlor are also important. Chronologies of events and organized exhibits that link the asset to the settlor’s planning help present a cohesive narrative to the court. Additional supporting material may involve certified copies of deeds, broker or bank records showing attempts to retitle accounts, and affidavits from institution personnel. The strength of the evidence determines whether a court will grant the petition. Preparing a clear and well-documented case improves the likelihood that a judge will conclude the settlor intended for the asset to be part of the trust, even if formal title transfer was not completed before death.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the evidence, whether parties contest the petition, and local court schedules. A straightforward, uncontested petition with clear documentation and cooperative institutions may be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months. However, contested matters, extensive discovery, or complex title issues can extend the process and lead to a longer timeline before a hearing and final ruling. Courts may require time for service on interested parties, briefing, and scheduling hearings, and delays can occur when additional evidence is sought or when objections require resolution. Clients should expect some variability and plan for procedural steps such as gathering records, serving notices, and potential hearings. Regular communication with legal counsel helps set realistic expectations about likely timing and potential milestones in the process.
Yes, in some cases a Heggstad petition can be resolved without a contested hearing if all interested parties agree or if institutions accept documentary proof of the settlor’s intent and retitle the asset administratively. Cooperative resolution is possible when beneficiaries, trustees, and custodial institutions are willing to act based on the evidence provided. Handling matters informally can save time and expense and preserve privacy by avoiding court proceedings. Nonetheless, institutions may decline to retitle assets without a court order, especially when records are incomplete or when competing claims exist. In such situations, a petition may be necessary to obtain a definitive judicial determination. Counsel can often attempt negotiation or informal requests first, and proceed to filing when cooperation is not achievable or when the risk of conflicting claims warrants a court resolution.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not inherently force beneficiaries into divisive litigation, but it does involve formal court action that may prompt responses or objections from interested parties. In many cases, filing a petition clarifies rights and can lead to settlement discussions that resolve disputes without a full contested hearing. When parties communicate openly and accept the evidence, the petition may lead to an efficient resolution that honors the settlor’s intent while preserving relationships among heirs. However, if beneficiaries or other interested parties disagree about ownership or interpretation of trust terms, the petition may become contested. That contested process can require hearings and additional legal work. Early and clear exchange of information often reduces the likelihood of prolonged disputes, so initiating dialogue and providing thorough documentation are important steps before or alongside filing a petition.
If a court denies a Heggstad petition, the asset will typically remain part of the decedent’s probate estate or subject to other ownership rules unless another legal remedy is pursued. A denial may result from insufficient evidence of the settlor’s intent or conflicting proof presented by opposing parties. After a denial, the parties can review the court’s reasons and consider options such as gathering additional evidence, resolving disputes through settlement, or exploring appellate review where appropriate and justified by legal grounds. Denying the petition can lead to alternative administration steps, including probate distribution according to the will or intestacy rules. Because denial can have significant consequences for the estate’s administration and beneficiary expectations, careful pre-filing preparation and realistic assessment of evidentiary strength are important. Counsel can help evaluate whether additional proof could be developed or whether alternative strategies should be pursued to achieve the settlor’s intended outcomes.
A successful Heggstad petition effects a judicial determination that specific assets should be administered under the trust, thereby removing those assets from probate administration. This outcome narrows the scope of probate by allowing trust terms to govern distribution and management of the recognized assets. As a result, trustees can apply trust provisions directly, which often speeds distribution and preserves estate privacy compared with probate processes. If a petition is unsuccessful, assets remain subject to the probate court’s administration, potentially requiring appointment of an executor and public probate procedures. That can involve additional cost and delay. Understanding how a petition interacts with probate helps clients make informed choices about pursuing court remedies to align property ownership with the settlor’s plan and avoid unnecessary public procedures.
In California, interested parties such as trustees, beneficiaries, executors, or other individuals with an interest in the estate may file a Heggstad petition when they believe assets should be treated as trust property. The petitioner must show a legal interest and present evidence supporting the claim that the decedent intended to fund the trust. Courts require proper service on all interested parties so that everyone with potential claims has notice and an opportunity to respond to the petition. Selecting the appropriate petitioner and ensuring proper representation is important for procedural and strategic reasons. Trustees often bring petitions to establish authority over assets, while beneficiaries may file to enforce the settlor’s intentions. Counsel can advise who should file based on the facts and potential procedural requirements to maximize the likelihood of a timely and favorable resolution.
Banks, title companies, and other custodial institutions often play a central role because they hold or control the assets in question. These institutions may require specific documentation or a court order before they will retitle property or release funds to a trustee. Their policies vary, and institutional resistance is a common reason parties seek a court determination. When institutions are cooperative, they may act on documentary proof without court intervention, facilitating administrative resolution of funding issues. When institutions decline to act, the petition provides a formal mechanism to obtain orders that compel recognition of trust ownership. Part of preparing a petition involves documenting interactions with institutions, including any refusals, and presenting evidence that addresses their concerns. Working with institutions constructively and documenting their requirements can streamline the post-ruling implementation process and reduce administrative delays.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary with the complexity of the case, the amount of evidence to collect and organize, whether hearings become necessary, and whether the matter is contested. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs to obtain certified records, and legal fees for preparing the petition and supporting materials. Contested matters that proceed to hearing require more time and resources and therefore increase costs. Clients should expect an initial discussion about budget and fee structure so they can make informed decisions about proceeding. There may also be additional transactional costs such as recording fees, title company charges, and fees for obtaining copies of historical records. When a favorable result avoids probate for the asset, the savings in time and probate expense can offset petition costs. A careful assessment of likely outcomes and potential savings versus the expense of court proceedings helps clients evaluate whether to pursue a petition.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas