A Heggstad petition can be a critical legal pathway for families in Portola Hills who discover that a deceased loved one intended assets to pass to a living trust but failed to retitle property before passing away. This situation often leads to uncertainty over who holds title and whether the trust’s terms control distribution. The petition asks a court to find that the property was always intended to be part of the trust, allowing the trustee or beneficiaries to complete transfers without full probate. Our office helps clients evaluate whether a Heggstad petition fits their circumstances and outlines the steps to move forward within California law.
Many families find it overwhelming to sort out trust administration after someone dies, especially when deeds, titles, or account registrations do not match trust documents. A Heggstad petition may resolve these issues without prolonged probate by asking the court to declare that assets should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s intent and supporting documentation. This process typically involves gathering trust instruments, related deeds or account statements, and testimony or records showing the decedent’s intent. We provide clear guidance to Portola Hills residents on compiling evidence and filing a petition that seeks to align property ownership with the decedent’s estate plan.
Filing a Heggstad petition can streamline administration and help beneficiaries obtain property without the delays and expense of a full probate proceeding. When a court recognizes that property was intended to be held in a trust, title can be corrected and assets transferred according to the trust’s terms, protecting family wishes and conserving estate resources. Additionally, a Heggstad petition provides legal clarity that reduces the likelihood of future disputes over ownership. For families in Portola Hills, pursuing this remedy can resolve title issues efficiently, preserve estate value, and provide peace of mind during an already difficult time.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California, including Portola Hills and the surrounding Orange County communities, providing comprehensive estate planning and trust administration services. Our team focuses on clear communication, careful document review, and practical procedural guidance to help clients resolve trust title issues through Heggstad petitions when appropriate. We assist with gathering trust documents, preparing declarations, coordinating necessary testimony, and filing the petition in the proper court. Our goal is to guide families through the process in a way that minimizes delay and gives them confidence that their loved one’s estate plan will be honored.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial proceeding in California where a petitioner asks the probate court to determine that certain assets should be treated as part of a trust, usually because the decedent intended the assets to be held in the trust but legal title was not transferred prior to death. The petition relies on documentary evidence such as trust instruments and deeds, along with declarations that explain the circumstances. Successful petitions allow trustees to complete transfers and manage assets under the trust, avoiding broader probate actions. This approach is tailored to resolving title discrepancies while honoring the decedent’s estate planning intent.
The Heggstad petition process typically requires careful preparation to show clear and convincing evidence that the decedent intended the property to be held in the trust. Evidence may include contemporaneous documents, beneficiary statements, signed trust provisions, and records showing administration consistent with trust ownership. The court examines the totality of the evidence and may hold a hearing to review testimony and documentation. If the court grants the petition, it issues orders that allow title to be corrected and assets to be distributed according to the trust, facilitating a smoother administration process for trustees and beneficiaries in Portola Hills.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used to ask a judge to confirm that property should be considered part of a trust even when the formal title was not transferred during the decedent’s lifetime. It is named after a leading California case and is often used to avoid or limit probate for assets that were intended to pass under a trust. The petition sets out the factual and legal basis for the court to make that determination, including an explanation of why the title discrepancy occurred and documentation supporting the decedent’s intent. The remedy aims to honor estate planning goals while providing a judicial resolution of title questions.
Preparing a Heggstad petition involves assembling trust documents, corroborating records, and sworn declarations that explain the circumstances surrounding the asset’s ownership. Evidence should show the decedent’s intent that the asset be in the trust, such as a trust instrument describing the asset, trust funding actions, or consistent administration. The petition is filed in probate court with supporting exhibits, and notice is provided to interested parties. The court reviews the materials and may schedule a hearing to consider testimony. If successful, the court’s order clarifies ownership and directs title changes so the trustee can manage or transfer assets according to the trust.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad petitions helps clients follow the process and communicate with counsel. Important concepts include trust instrument, trustee, beneficiary, title, probate, declaration, and court order. Knowing these definitions aids in gathering the correct documents and understanding what the court will consider when evaluating intent. We walk clients through each term and explain how it applies to their situation in practical terms so they can make informed decisions about whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate path to clear title and enforce the decedent’s estate plan.
A trust instrument is the legal document that creates a trust and outlines how the grantor’s assets should be held and distributed. It identifies the trustee, beneficiaries, distributions, and any specific instructions from the grantor. In Heggstad petition matters, the trust instrument is central evidence of the grantor’s intent to place particular assets in trust. Copies of the trust instrument and any amendments are commonly submitted with the petition to show the court the trust’s terms and help establish that the asset at issue was meant to be part of the trust estate.
A declaration is a written, sworn statement presented to the court that describes facts relevant to the petition. In Heggstad proceedings, declarations may be provided by the trustee, family members, or other witnesses to explain the circumstances that demonstrate the decedent intended the asset to be held in the trust. Declarations often include documentary attachments such as account statements, deeds, or correspondence and serve to organize the evidence for the judge’s review. Clear, detailed declarations improve the court’s ability to evaluate the petition.
Probate court is the judicial body that oversees matters involving wills, trusts, and the administration of decedents’ estates. Heggstad petitions are filed in the probate division of the superior court in the county where the decedent lived or where the property is located. The court evaluates submitted evidence and issues orders that resolve disputes about title and trust ownership. Filing a petition in probate court is a formal legal step to correct title and align asset ownership with the decedent’s estate plan when informal transfers are not possible.
Title correction is the process of legally amending public records or issuing court orders so that ownership of property reflects the decedent’s intended plan. In the context of a Heggstad petition, title correction often follows a favorable court ruling that the asset should be treated as trust property. The court’s order can be recorded with the county recorder or otherwise used to effect the transfer, which enables the trustee to manage, sell, or distribute the property according to the trust. Correcting title helps prevent future ownership disputes.
When assets intended for a trust remain titled outside the trust, families must choose between several legal options, including initiating a Heggstad petition, pursuing a full probate administration, or using informal transfer methods when feasible. A Heggstad petition can provide a focused, court-supervised remedy to align title with the trust while avoiding the broader requirements of probate. Probate may be required when multiple contested claims exist or when the evidence for trust ownership is insufficient. We help Portola Hills clients weigh the procedural timelines, costs, and evidentiary standards for each option to determine the most appropriate path.
A narrow judicial approach is often appropriate when clear documentary evidence demonstrates the decedent intended the property to be governed by the trust. Documents such as the trust instrument, recent deeds, account statements, or correspondence that reference the trust can show the decedent’s intent. If the paperwork and supporting declarations present a coherent picture of intent and no significant parties contest the claim, a Heggstad petition may be the efficient route. This path can reduce the cost and duration of resolving title issues, allowing trustees to proceed with administration and distribution under the trust’s terms.
A focused petition may be sufficient when potential heirs or interested parties agree with the characterization of the property as trust assets or when disputes are limited and resolvable by a court declaration. When beneficiaries and other stakeholders are aligned, the court can issue orders quickly to effect title changes. This cooperative context reduces litigation risk and expense, enabling a more streamlined process. Our role includes facilitating communication among parties, collecting supporting documentation, and presenting a clear petition that helps the court make an informed decision without a drawn-out contested process.
Comprehensive legal attention is often necessary when documentation conflicts or when multiple parties assert competing ownership or beneficiary claims. In those scenarios, the court may need a full evidentiary record and legal briefing to reconcile contradictions. A more extensive approach includes formal discovery, depositions, and legal motions that help clarify facts and legal rights. For Portola Hills residents facing disputes over property intended for a trust, this thorough path helps protect interests and seeks a binding resolution that addresses both the title claim and any contesting assertions.
When the asset portfolio is complex or when title issues interact with other estate matters—such as inconsistent beneficiary designations, retirement accounts, or competing wills—a comprehensive approach can help coordinate remedies and prevent overlapping disputes. In such cases, legal counsel assists with cross-referencing documents, pursuing necessary petitions, and resolving interconnected issues in a cohesive strategy. The goal is to ensure that the overall estate plan functions as intended and that any title corrections dovetail with distributions, creditor claims, and related administration tasks.
A carefully managed legal approach ensures that title corrections are handled with attention to evidentiary support, procedural requirements, and long-term estate administration needs. This reduces the chance of future challenges by producing a clear court record and proper recording of title changes. It also helps trustees avoid personal liability by following court-approved orders and documented steps for transferring assets. For families in Portola Hills, a measured approach balances efficiency with legal protection, providing a durable solution that aligns property ownership with the decedent’s documented intentions.
Comprehensive handling also helps identify and resolve related issues that might otherwise be overlooked, such as unpaid taxes, title encumbrances, or creditor notifications that could affect distribution. Addressing these matters as part of the title correction process preserves estate value and protects beneficiaries from unexpected claims. Ensuring filings and recordings are properly completed with county offices and that required notices are delivered reduces downstream complications. A careful process provides clarity, finality, and a smoother transition of property according to the trust.
A thorough approach reduces the likelihood of future ownership disputes by creating clear court orders and recorded documents that reflect the corrected title. When the court has reviewed evidence and entered a formal ruling, the legal standing of the trustee and beneficiaries is strengthened and the pathway for managing or distributing the property is clarified. This durability benefits families by offering greater predictability and diminishing the possibility of subsequent litigation. The process provides a defensible foundation that helps preserve family relationships and estate assets over time.
When title issues are resolved through a careful legal process, trustees can proceed with administration tasks such as selling property, transferring ownership, or distributing proceeds without uncertainty. Completing the necessary court actions and recordation clears practical obstacles that otherwise delay transactions. A streamlined administration benefits beneficiaries by accelerating access to estate assets and reducing administrative costs. Properly documented title corrections also facilitate interactions with banks, title companies, and county recorders, making post-petition transfers more efficient and reliable.
Collecting all relevant trust documents, deeds, account statements, and correspondence is essential when preparing a petition. Records that show the trust’s terms, any funding actions, and communications that reference the trust help establish the necessary evidence of intent. Also look for amendments, certification of trust documents, and any recent transfers that relate to the asset. Organizing these materials early streamlines the preparation of declarations and exhibits, and enables counsel to evaluate strengths and gaps in the case before filing the petition in probate court.
Well-organized declarations that explain the facts and attach relevant documents strengthen a petition by presenting a coherent narrative for the court. Declarations should describe the relationship of the asset to the trust, the circumstances that led to the title discrepancy, and any actions taken by the trustee or decedent consistent with trust ownership. Attaching exhibits such as copies of deeds, trust pages, and account statements helps the judge assess intent. Clear presentation of facts and exhibits reduces ambiguity and supports a favorable decision when the evidence aligns with the trust’s terms.
Families often consider a Heggstad petition when a decedent intended assets to pass under a trust but paperwork was not updated before death. This remedy can be faster and more narrowly focused than full probate administration, especially when the evidence of intent is strong and there are few or no credible disputes. By seeking a judicial declaration, trustees can obtain court authority to transfer title and distribute assets according to the trust, helping preserve estate value and honoring the decedent’s estate plan. The process is particularly useful for avoiding unnecessary probate on specific assets.
Other reasons to pursue a Heggstad petition include correcting public records to prevent future challenges and enabling trustees to manage or sell property without uncertainty. A court order provides a clear legal framework for downstream transactions with title companies, banks, and potential buyers. For those who inherit property or serve as trustees in Portola Hills, obtaining judicial clarity can reduce personal exposure and make estate administration more efficient. Legal guidance helps determine whether the petition is the appropriate route based on the strength of evidence and the presence of any conflicting claims.
Typical circumstances include a decedent executing a trust but not transferring real estate deeds or bank accounts into the name of the trust, changed beneficiary designations that do not match trust terms, or mixed records showing inconsistent ownership. These gaps often become apparent when a trustee attempts to administer the trust after death. Instances of clerical mistakes, oversight, or sudden illness can leave assets titled improperly. A Heggstad petition addresses these situations by asking the court to reconcile title with the documented intent, thus enabling proper trust administration and distribution to beneficiaries.
A common example is real estate that was meant to be in a revocable living trust but remained titled in the decedent’s name at the time of death. This can occur when the deed was never recorded in the trust’s name or when an attempted transfer was incomplete. When the trustee needs to manage, sell, or transfer the home, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare the property is trust property based on the trust instrument and supporting evidence. This remedy helps avoid opening a full probate for a single item of property.
Another frequent issue is accounts that were intended to be controlled by the trust but remain registered in the decedent’s name due to oversight or administrative delay. Financial institutions sometimes require court orders or corrected title documentation before allowing transfers or distributions. A Heggstad petition can be used to obtain a judicial finding that the accounts were meant to belong to the trust, accompanied by supporting statements and account records. This process can clear the way for trustees to access funds and fulfill trust distribution provisions.
Conflicts between beneficiary designations on accounts or policies and the language of a trust can complicate administration. When discrepancies exist, a Heggstad petition may be used alongside other probate tools to clarify which assets should be handled by the trust. The court evaluates the evidence of the decedent’s intent and may issue orders that resolve inconsistencies. Careful review of beneficiary forms, account agreements, and trust provisions is essential in preparing the petition and supporting material for court consideration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused assistance to Portola Hills residents facing trust title challenges. We help clients gather trust documents, prepare declarations, identify interested parties, and file the Heggstad petition in the appropriate Orange County probate court. Our approach emphasizes clear communication about required documentation, likely timelines, and potential outcomes. We strive to make the process as predictable as possible while representing your interest in securing a court order that aligns property ownership with the decedent’s estate planning intentions.
Selecting the right legal guidance matters when seeking a judicial declaration about trust ownership. Our team brings practical experience in trust administration and probate procedures, helping clients evaluate documentary evidence and craft petitions that present a clear case to the court. We work to minimize delays and guide trustees and beneficiaries through each procedural step, including required notices and court filings. Our goal is to secure a durable result that allows trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust’s terms.
We emphasize clear planning and thorough preparation so petitions submitted to the court are supported by organized evidence and persuasive declarations. That preparation reduces the risk of contested hearings and helps resolve title issues efficiently. For Portola Hills families, this means less administrative uncertainty and a smoother transition during trust administration. Our firm also coordinates with title companies, county recorders, and financial institutions after a favorable ruling to complete necessary recordings and transfers.
Communication is a priority throughout the process. We discuss likely timelines, required documents, and potential outcomes in plain language so clients can make informed decisions. If additional matters arise—such as competing claims or related estate issues—we identify strategies to address those alongside the petition. Our work focuses on practical solutions that help families move forward and preserve the decedent’s estate plan while minimizing unnecessary expense and delay.
Our process begins with an initial case review to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We request trust documents and any related records, identify interested parties, and advise on evidence that will support the petition. After thorough document assembly and drafting of sworn declarations, we file the petition and serve the required notices. We prepare the court submission to present a concise factual narrative and attend hearings if scheduled. Post-order, we assist with recording documents and completing transfers as directed by the court.
The first step involves a detailed assessment of the trust, deed, and any other documents that relate to the asset at issue. We help identify gaps in the record and gather supporting materials such as account statements, prior deeds, or correspondence that supports the trust funding intent. This phase also includes identifying and locating potential interested parties who must be notified of the petition. Building a strong factual record at the outset promotes a smoother court filing and supports the credibility of the petition.
We conduct a careful review of the trust instrument and any recorded documents to determine what evidence exists that links the asset to the trust. This review looks for language in the trust that references specific property, relevant amendments, certification of trust pages, and any documentary actions taken to fund the trust. Identifying these items early allows us to craft declarations and exhibits that connect the asset to the trust and explain why title correction is necessary.
Gathering supporting evidence includes collecting account statements, deeds, certification of trust, and witness statements or declarations that describe how the decedent handled the asset during life. Declarations prepared by trustees and knowledgeable witnesses present a narrative for the court and attach documentary proof. This preparation ensures the petition is accompanied by a cohesive set of exhibits that present the decedent’s intent and the surrounding circumstances in a clear, organized manner for judicial review.
With evidence compiled and declarations drafted, the petition is filed in the appropriate probate court in Orange County. The filing includes the petition form, supporting exhibits, and proposed orders. Concurrently, required notices are served on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties in accordance with statutory rules. Proper service and adherence to timelines are essential for the court to proceed. We manage the filing and service process to ensure compliance and minimize procedural delays that could affect the petition’s progress.
We draft the petition and prepare proposed orders that, if approved, will direct title corrections and other relief sought. The filing package is organized to highlight the relevant trust provisions and supporting evidence, making it easier for the judge to review. Clear proposed orders help expedite the court’s decision-making when the facts support the requested relief. Accurate preparation at this stage sets the foundation for an effective presentation of the case to the court.
Serving notice to interested parties is a critical procedural requirement. Notices must be delivered according to statutory methods so that beneficiaries, heirs, and potential claimants have an opportunity to respond. Proper service reduces the risk of procedural challenges that could delay resolution. We ensure that notice is carried out correctly and maintain records of service so the court has evidence that parties were properly informed of the petition and the scheduled hearing, if any.
If a hearing is set, we present the petition and supporting declarations to the court and respond to any inquiries the judge or opposing parties may raise. When the court is satisfied with the evidence of intent and procedural compliance, it can issue an order declaring the asset to be part of the trust and directing title corrections. After the order is entered, we assist with recording the order with the county recorder or completing other actions necessary to effect the transfer and ensure that the trustee can administer the asset according to the trust.
At any hearing, we present the facts and declarations that support the petition and address questions from the court or other parties. Clear presentation of the documentary record and testimony helps the judge evaluate the claim that the asset was intended for the trust. If objections arise, we work to resolve them through clarification of the evidence or legal argument. Our objective is to secure a court order that reflects the decedent’s intent and provides a practical path for title correction.
Following a favorable order, we guide trustees through recording the court order with the appropriate county offices, updating title records, and coordinating with financial institutions or title companies to finalize transfers. These closing steps are essential to ensure the court’s decision is reflected in public records and that trustees can manage or distribute assets without further legal obstacles. Proper completion of these tasks helps close the administration chapter and allows beneficiaries to receive their distributions as specified by the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare that certain assets should be treated as part of a trust despite the absence of formal title transfers before the decedent’s death. It is often used when a trust was properly executed but property, such as a deeded home or financial account, remains titled in the decedent’s name. The petition presents evidence and sworn statements showing the decedent intended the asset to be held in the trust, and it seeks a judicial order to correct title and permit administration under the trust’s terms. When the court grants a Heggstad petition, it issues orders that enable the trustee to transfer or manage the asset in accordance with the trust instrument. The remedy can be narrower and less time-consuming than full probate when the evidentiary record is strong and parties are cooperative. However, the success of the petition depends on the quality of the documentation and the presence or absence of competing claims, so a careful review of records and preparation of supporting declarations are essential steps before filing.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on the complexity of the record, the availability of evidence, and the court’s calendar. Preliminary work such as gathering the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and declarations can take several weeks depending on document accessibility. After filing, the court’s schedule and required notice periods impact when a hearing can be held. In relatively straightforward cases with cooperative parties, the process can move more quickly, while contested matters or missing documentation lengthen the timeline. It is also important to account for post-order tasks, such as recording the court’s judgment with the county recorder and coordinating with title companies or financial institutions to complete transfers. These administrative steps add time after the court issues its ruling. We provide realistic timeline guidance based on local Orange County practice so clients understand both the court process and the subsequent tasks necessary to effect title changes.
The court typically looks for clear, probative evidence that the decedent intended for the asset to be part of the trust. This evidence may include the trust instrument itself, pages of the trust that reference the asset, deeds or beneficiary designations consistent with trust terms, account records showing trust funding attempts, and contemporaneous correspondence or notes that indicate intent. Declarations from trustees or witnesses who can describe the decedent’s actions and statements also play a central role in building the factual narrative for the judge. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether it is convincing enough to declare the asset part of the trust. Documentary support that aligns with the trust’s provisions and shows consistent treatment of the asset as trust property strengthens the petition. Where the record contains ambiguities or conflicting claims, the court may request additional proof or schedule a contested hearing to resolve disputes, making careful preparation essential before filing.
A Heggstad petition can avoid full probate for the specific asset at issue if the court finds the evidence supports treating the asset as trust property. This targeted remedy focuses on correcting title and enabling trust administration for that asset, rather than opening a comprehensive probate administration for the entire estate. When successful, it provides a judicial basis to transfer or manage the property under the trust and can save time and cost compared with probate for that particular item. However, it does not automatically resolve all estate matters or eliminate probate if other assets, creditors, or contested issues require broader court supervision. If significant disputes exist, or if other estate administration requirements are present, separate probate proceedings may still be necessary. Consulting about the full estate picture helps determine whether a Heggstad petition sufficiently addresses the primary concerns or whether additional steps are advisable.
Statutory notice rules require that certain interested parties be informed of a Heggstad petition filing. These often include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs who might have an interest in the decedent’s estate, and known creditors in some circumstances. Providing proper notice gives those parties an opportunity to review the petition and object if they believe the evidence is insufficient or their rights are affected. Failing to provide required notices can lead to delays or procedural invalidation of the petition. Identifying and serving notice on the correct parties is therefore a critical procedural step. We assist clients in determining who qualifies as an interested party under California law, preparing the required service documents, and maintaining proof of service for the court record. Proper compliance with notice requirements helps ensure the petition proceeds on a sound procedural footing.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can be opposed by parties who believe the asset does not belong to the trust or who assert competing claims. When opposition arises, the matter may proceed to a contested hearing where the court reviews evidence from all sides and weighs testimony and documents. Contested proceedings typically require more extensive preparation, including responses to objections, potential discovery, and courtroom argument. The process becomes more fact-intensive and may extend timelines and costs compared with an uncontested filing. If a petition is contested, careful legal strategy is important to present the strongest available evidence and counter opposing claims. The court will evaluate credibility and documentary support, so clear, organized declarations and corroborating exhibits are essential. We help prepare responsive filings and represent clients at hearings to pursue a resolution that aligns with the facts and legal standards applicable to the case.
After a Heggstad order is entered, the court’s judgment typically provides the authority needed to correct public records or direct how title should be reflected going forward. For real estate, the order is often recorded with the county recorder to update deed records and show that the property is held in trust per the court’s determination. Recording the order completes the public record change and helps banks, title companies, and potential buyers recognize the trust’s interest in the property. We assist with the recording and follow-up steps required to implement the court’s order, including preparing any required grant deeds or recordable documents and coordinating with title companies when necessary. Properly recording the order ensures the trustee can proceed with post-order actions such as sale or transfer in a manner consistent with the court’s directive and the trust’s provisions.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition may include pursuing a full probate administration, seeking informal resolution with financial institutions or title companies when acceptable evidence is available, or using other probate petitions tailored to the situation. In some cases, institutions will accept a certification of trust or other evidence to allow transfers without court action. When parties agree and documentation is persuasive, institutional procedures can sometimes effect transfers administratively without filing a petition. However, when institutions decline to act or when legal clarity is needed, a Heggstad petition offers a judicial mechanism to resolve title questions. Choosing between alternatives depends on the strength of the documentary record, the willingness of third parties to accept trust documentation, and the presence of disputes. We evaluate the available paths and recommend the option that best aligns with the client’s objectives and the practical realities of title correction.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary based on complexity, the need for contested proceedings, court filing fees, and the effort required to gather and prepare supporting evidence. Uncontested petitions with a clear documentary record and cooperative parties generally incur lower attorney fees and court costs, while contested matters or cases requiring additional discovery and hearings will be more expensive. Recording fees and post-order administrative expenses also contribute to the overall cost. We provide transparent estimates up front and discuss fee structures so clients understand the expected financial outlay for their situation. Considering the potential savings compared with a full probate administration for specific assets, a well-presented Heggstad petition can be cost-effective when it resolves title issues efficiently. We work to keep clients informed about likely fees, required court costs, and any additional expenses so they can make informed decisions about pursuing the petition versus alternative routes.
To begin the process, start by gathering the trust document, any recorded deeds, account statements, and related paperwork that show the decedent’s handling of the asset. Gather contact information for beneficiaries and any other parties with a potential interest. With these materials in hand, schedule an initial consultation to review the documents and discuss whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and what evidence will be needed. Early evaluation helps identify gaps and plan next steps to build a strong petition. If you decide to proceed, counsel will assist in preparing declarations, assembling exhibits, and filing the petition with the probate court. We also help coordinate the required notice to interested parties and prepare for any hearings. Taking these initial steps early preserves evidence and positions the petition for the best possible outcome in court, enabling trustees to move forward with estate administration once the matter is resolved.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas