If you are considering changing the terms of an existing trust in Portola Hills, a trust modification petition can help update the document to reflect new wishes, changed family circumstances, or corrected drafting issues. The process involves petitioning the court when a straightforward amendment is not possible under the trust’s terms or where parties disagree about intent. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients across California with careful review of trust instruments, assessment of applicable law, and preparation of clear filings. This service helps preserve the settlor’s intent while addressing contemporary needs and potential conflicts among beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition may be necessary for a variety of reasons, such as changes in marital status, relocation, changes in tax law, or to correct ambiguities that could lead to future litigation. Although many trusts allow administrative amendments, some adjustments require court approval to ensure validity and enforceability. Our firm brings practical experience in estate planning matters for San Jose and Portola Hills residents, helping clients identify the best path forward whether that involves agreement among beneficiaries or a judicial determination to modify trust terms for fairness and clarity under California law.
Filing a petition to modify a trust can prevent disputes, align the trust with the settlor’s current intentions, and address practical complications that arise over time. A properly handled modification preserves family relationships by clarifying responsibilities and distributions, reduces the risk of costly litigation in the future, and ensures that trustees have clear authority to act. It can also resolve errors in the original instrument or adapt to changes in beneficiaries’ needs, such as health concerns or dependency matters. Taking timely action through a petition helps protect assets and promotes smoother administration of the estate.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California with focused attention on trust and estate planning matters. Our team works directly with clients to review trust documents, advise on options for amendment or modification, and guide them through court proceedings when required. We emphasize clear communication, careful document preparation, and practical strategies to achieve clients’ objectives while minimizing conflict. Whether a trust requires a simple clarification or a formal judicial modification, our approach prioritizes protecting family relationships and preserving the settlor’s wishes in a predictable and legally sound manner.
A trust modification petition is a legal request to the probate or superior court to alter trust terms when private amendment is not feasible or when beneficiaries disagree about interpretation. California law provides mechanisms for nonjudicial settlements and court-ordered modifications where issues such as mistake, changed circumstances, or ambiguity exist. Preparing a petition requires documenting the trust’s history, the reason for modification, the proposed changes, and the parties’ positions. The court evaluates whether the requested changes align with public policy and the settlor’s probable intent while protecting beneficiaries’ rights and ensuring proper administration of trust assets.
The process often involves serving notice to interested parties, submitting supporting declarations and evidence, and presenting legal arguments demonstrating why the modification serves the trust’s purpose. Courts may approve modifications to correct technical errors, clarify vagueness, or adapt to unforeseen circumstances that frustrate the original plan. Mediation and negotiation among beneficiaries can sometimes resolve disputes without full litigation, but when agreement is impossible a petition allows the court to make a binding determination. Accurate paperwork and persuasive legal framing are essential to securing the result that preserves the settlor’s intended distribution and management of assets.
A petition to modify a trust asks the court to change specific provisions or to grant authority to alter administrative terms in the trust document. Requests can range from technical corrections, such as fixing ambiguous language or clarifying trustee authority, to substantive changes addressing distributions or beneficiary designations where circumstances make original terms impractical. The petition must explain why ordinary amendment procedures are not sufficient and how the proposed change better effectuates the settlor’s intent or rectifies a mistake. The court’s decision balances legal standards with fairness to beneficiaries and fiduciary responsibilities.
Successful petitions include clear identification of the trust, the settlor, and all interested parties, along with a detailed statement of the proposed modifications and the factual and legal basis for them. Supporting evidence might include declarations, documentary proof, and affidavits describing the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances. Procedural steps typically include serving notices, filing a petition in the appropriate court, attending hearings, and complying with local rules governing trust proceedings. Attention to detail, thorough factual support, and careful adherence to procedural requirements all contribute to a smoother judicial review and a higher likelihood of achieving the desired modification.
Understanding common terms can clarify the process: definitions for trust-related terminology, procedural concepts, and fiduciary duties help clients follow each stage of a petition. Terms such as settlor, beneficiary, trustee, trust instrument, and petition are central to filings. Additional concepts include modification versus amendment, nonjudicial settlement agreements, and Heggstad matters relating to trust property transfers. Familiarity with these ideas reduces confusion and allows informed decision making when considering court involvement to modify trust provisions or resolve disputes among interested parties.
The settlor is the person who originally created the trust and established its terms and objectives. The settlor’s intent directs how the trust is interpreted, and courts often look to evidence of that intent when evaluating modification requests. When the settlor is still alive, their current wishes and capacity may affect whether changes can be implemented nonjudicially. If the settlor is deceased, petitions must rely on documentary evidence and contextual information to determine what modifications would best effectuate the settlor’s original purpose while adapting to changed circumstances.
The trustee is the individual or entity charged with managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act prudently, in good faith, and in the best interests of the beneficiaries. When trust terms are unclear or impractical to administer, a trustee may seek court guidance or petition for authority to make necessary changes. Court-approved modifications can clarify trustee powers, resolve disputes, and authorize actions that protect trust property and fulfill the settlor’s objectives.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive distributions or benefits from the trust according to its terms. Beneficiaries have legal standing to object to proposed modifications that they believe would harm their interests. Courts weigh beneficiary rights heavily when considering petitions, aiming to balance protection of those rights with the settlor’s intent and practical needs of administration. Open communication and negotiation among beneficiaries can sometimes produce agreements that avoid lengthy litigation and result in a mutually acceptable modification.
A nonjudicial settlement agreement is a private resolution between interested parties that settles issues arising under a trust without court intervention, provided the agreement complies with applicable law and does not violate public policy. When beneficiaries and trustees can reach consensus, this option can be faster and less adversarial than a court petition. The agreement can address interpretation, modification, or administration issues, and later be submitted to the court for approval if desired. Well-drafted agreements reduce uncertainty and help preserve relationships while ensuring lawful trust administration.
When trust issues arise, parties can pursue negotiation, mediation, or a nonjudicial settlement agreement as alternatives to filing a petition in court. These options are generally less costly and more private, and they work well when beneficiaries and trustees can communicate effectively. A court petition becomes necessary when parties cannot agree, when the trust lacks mechanisms for amendment, or when a formal judicial determination is needed to protect interests. Choosing the right path depends on conflict levels, urgency, clarity of the settlor’s intent, and the practical need for enforceable authority over trust administration.
Limited approaches are often adequate for correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous language, or updating administrative details that do not alter substantive distributions. When all interested parties agree on the nature of the correction, a nonjudicial settlement or simple amendment permitted by the trust instrument can resolve the issue without court involvement. This preserves privacy, reduces costs, and maintains family harmony. Even in seemingly minor matters, documenting the agreement thoroughly and following required formalities helps prevent future disputes and ensures consistent administration of the trust.
If the trust grants the trustee sufficient discretionary powers and the issue relates to exercise of those powers, internal adjustments or trustee determinations may be adequate. Trustees can sometimes resolve management questions, change investment approaches, or address distribution timing without modifying the trust terms. When beneficiaries accept the trustee’s reasonable exercise of discretion, formal judicial action is unnecessary. Proper trustee documentation, transparent communication with beneficiaries, and compliance with fiduciary duties remain essential to avoid challenges and to keep trust administration stable and predictable.
Comprehensive legal intervention is often required when beneficiaries contest trust terms, when there are competing claims to assets, or when alleged mistakes in drafting raise questions about the settlor’s true intent. In these situations, filing a petition helps secure a court order that resolves disputes and provides enforceable guidance for trustees and beneficiaries. The process requires a detailed factual record, legal analysis, and sometimes litigation to protect the rights of all parties. A thorough approach reduces the risk of ongoing contention and clarifies responsibilities for future administration.
When proposed modifications would materially change how assets are distributed or the fundamental objectives of the trust, court approval may be necessary to ensure the changes are lawful and consistent with public policy. Complex situations can include altering beneficiary classes, redirecting significant assets, or modifying protective provisions such as spendthrift clauses. These changes can have tax, creditor, and public policy implications that require careful legal evaluation and court review to protect all involved parties and to ensure the trust continues to operate as intended.
A comprehensive approach ensures that proposed changes are thoroughly vetted for legal validity, practical effect, and potential unintended consequences. By assembling a clear factual record, obtaining needed evidence, and carefully framing legal arguments, petitioners improve the court’s ability to issue a durable order. This method reduces the likelihood of subsequent challenges and clarifies the trustee’s duties, protecting beneficiaries and preserving family assets. Attention to procedural requirements and strategic planning also helps streamline court proceedings and supports a timely resolution that respects the settlor’s intent.
Comprehensive handling also provides beneficiaries and trustees with confidence that changes are implemented lawfully and equitably. Where disputes exist, thoughtful legal advocacy and mediation efforts can encourage settlements that avoid protracted litigation. For complex assets, tax-sensitive provisions, or blended family situations, a careful legal review flags issues early and proposes solutions that minimize future uncertainty. The goal of a deliberate approach is to create enforceable modifications that facilitate efficient trust administration and protect the interests of all parties involved.
Securing formal court authorization for significant changes gives trustees and beneficiaries confidence that the modifications are enforceable and will withstand later challenge. A judicial order provides a definitive ruling on interpretation or restructuring of trust terms, reducing ambiguity in administration. This formal resolution benefits trustees by clarifying duties and protecting them from liability for following an approved modification. For beneficiaries, court action can settle disputes once and for all, providing peace of mind that distributions and management will proceed according to a validated plan.
By addressing complex legal and factual issues up front and obtaining a thorough judicial determination when needed, parties reduce the chance of recurrent disputes and additional court proceedings later on. A comprehensive process anticipates potential objections and seeks to resolve ambiguities before they escalate, which protects family relationships and trust assets. When modifications are implemented through a well-documented legal framework, trustees can administer the trust with greater certainty and beneficiaries receive clearer guidance about their rights and expectations.
Begin by collecting the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, and records of trustee actions. Detailed documentation helps demonstrate the trust’s history and supports arguments about the settlor’s intent or technical errors. Obtain financial statements for trust assets, beneficiary contact information, and any correspondence relevant to the trust’s administration. Well-organized records enable quicker assessment of whether a nonjudicial solution is viable or whether a court petition is necessary, and they form the backbone of a persuasive factual record for filings.
A persuasive petition relies on a thorough factual record explaining why modification is necessary or appropriate. Collect declarations from individuals with firsthand knowledge, document any mistakes or changed circumstances, and include evidence that proposed changes align with the settlor’s intent. Courts weigh facts heavily, so presenting clear, credible documentation increases the likelihood of a favorable decision. Anticipating potential objections and addressing them in the record also reduces the risk of delay and helps the court reach a reasoned resolution more efficiently.
Consider a petition when trust terms no longer reflect the settlor’s wishes, when administrative provisions prevent practical management, or when beneficiaries dispute interpretation in ways that jeopardize efficient administration. Changes in family dynamics, retirement plans, or tax considerations can all justify seeking modification. If the trust document lacks a mechanism for the needed adjustment or parties cannot agree, a court petition may provide the most reliable path to a lasting resolution. Thoughtful timing and documentation are central to a successful petition and to protecting the trust’s purpose.
Other reasons to pursue a petition include correcting drafting mistakes, addressing unintended consequences of earlier provisions, and enabling trustees to act with clear authority. Where ambiguity threatens to derail distributions or exposes trustees to liability, a judicial determination can restore order. The decision to petition should weigh the cost and time of court proceedings against the risks of leaving problematic provisions unchanged. Many clients find that a focused petition ultimately saves resources by preventing prolonged disputes and ensuring effective trust administration for the long term.
Frequent triggers include remarriage or divorce, the birth of new children or grandchildren, changes in beneficiaries’ needs, unclear language in the trust, and transfers of property not reflected in trust records. Financial changes such as large asset transfers or tax law updates can also make former provisions impractical. When one or more beneficiaries object to a trustee’s intended action or when trustees lack clarity about powers, parties may need a court ruling to resolve disputes. Identifying the specific circumstances helps determine whether a nonjudicial path is possible or whether a petition is appropriate.
Life events, including divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths, often change the fairness or practicality of original trust terms. When family changes affect beneficiary needs or relationships, trust provisions may no longer achieve the settlor’s intent. A petition can adjust distributions, change trustees, or redefine classes of beneficiaries to better reflect current realities. Early evaluation and candid discussion with family members can prevent prolonged conflict and help determine whether a streamlined amendment or formal judicial modification is the best course of action.
Drafting mistakes such as unclear language, conflicting clauses, or omitted provisions can render a trust difficult to administer. Ambiguities can provoke disputes about the settlor’s intent and lead to conflicting interpretations among beneficiaries and trustees. In these circumstances, a petition for modification or clarification helps the court interpret the trust and resolve inconsistencies, ensuring trustees have a clear mandate to act. Thorough review and correction of the trust document reduce future misunderstandings and protect assets from avoidable disputes.
When assets intended to be held by a trust are not properly transferred or recorded, questions about ownership and administration can arise. Issues like property held in an individual’s name, retirement accounts with outdated beneficiary designations, or assets left out of the trust may require petitions such as Heggstad petitions to confirm inclusion in the trust. Addressing these gaps through appropriate petitions or trust modifications ensures that the settlor’s overall estate plan functions as intended and reduces the risk of probate or competing claims against those assets.
Residents of Portola Hills and surrounding Orange County communities can rely on focused legal support when trust terms require adjustment or when disputes make court intervention necessary. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides practical guidance on documentation, negotiation, and court filings that align with California law. We prioritize clear communication, timely action, and solutions aimed at minimizing friction among family members. Whether you need a petition to correct an error or to seek judicial modification, our office assists clients in navigating the process with attention to legal detail and client priorities.
Our approach blends careful document review with strategic planning tailored to each family’s circumstances. We focus on understanding the settlor’s original intent, identifying practical alternatives, and preparing persuasive filings that present the facts clearly to the court. We also emphasize communication among interested parties to explore settlement possibilities before resorting to litigation, which can save time and preserve relationships. For clients in Portola Hills and across California, we provide dependable representation aimed at achieving durable, legally sound outcomes.
Clients benefit from a firm that is familiar with local court procedures, probate practice, and the subtleties of trust law in California. We assist with evidence collection, drafting of petitions, negotiation with beneficiaries, and representation at hearings when needed. The goal is practical resolution that protects assets and clarifies trustee authority while limiting disruption to family dynamics. Our firm places a premium on responsiveness, clear explanations of legal options, and methodical preparation to support each client’s objectives under state law.
When trust matters involve sensitive family relationships or complex asset structures, having a consistent, attentive legal resource helps reduce stress and uncertainty. We guide clients through each procedural step, keep parties informed of developments, and pursue resolutions that reflect the settlor’s wishes and legal requirements. From modest clarifications to substantial modifications and court petitions, our office assists clients in selecting the pathway that best protects beneficiaries and preserves the integrity of the estate plan.
Our process begins with an in-depth review of the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, and the facts that motivate a proposed change. We assess whether a nonjudicial resolution is possible and beneficial, and if not, we prepare a petition that organizes the factual record and legal arguments in a clear and persuasive way. We handle service of process, comply with court filing requirements, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout the process we prioritize transparent communication, practical timelines, and efforts to resolve disputes efficiently whenever feasible.
The first step is a comprehensive intake and review of the trust, amendments, related estate documents, and factual circumstances prompting change. We collect necessary records, interview relevant parties, and identify legal theories and procedural options available under California law. This assessment determines whether a nonjudicial settlement is likely or whether a formal petition is the appropriate path. Clear documentation established at this stage supports subsequent filings and helps shape an effective negotiation or litigation strategy.
We examine the trust document, any amendments, deeds, beneficiary designations, and financial records to understand ownership and intended distributions. This review looks for drafting inconsistencies, administrative impediments, or evidence of the settlor’s intent that bear on the requested modification. Identifying these factors early clarifies potential challenges and informs decisions on whether a private resolution is feasible or whether court intervention is necessary to resolve disputes or enforce modifications.
Gathering supporting evidence, including declarations from family members, trustees, or others with direct knowledge, strengthens a petition. Documentary proof of communications, financial transactions, and decisions made during administration helps explain why a modification is appropriate. A well-organized evidentiary package supports settlement discussions and prepares for court review, demonstrating the factual basis for proposed changes and addressing foreseeable objections from interested parties.
Once the record is prepared and the factual and legal bases are established, we draft and file the petition with the appropriate superior court and serve notice on all interested parties according to California rules. Proper notice allows beneficiaries to participate and raises the potential for negotiation. Filing initiates a formal process that may include scheduling hearings, exchanging evidence, and engaging in settlement discussions. Accurate filings and strict compliance with procedural requirements are essential to avoid delays and to preserve all parties’ rights.
The petition must clearly state the legal authority sought, the factual basis for modification, and any relief requested, supported by exhibits and declarations. Clear, concise drafting that anticipates questions and addresses legal standards improves the court’s ability to evaluate the request. Supporting exhibits that document the trust’s terms and historical context are attached to the petition to provide the court with a full picture of the circumstances warranting modification.
After filing, all interested parties must be served and given an opportunity to object or respond. Managing communications and responses carefully can lead to negotiated settlements or clarify issues that require court action. When objections arise, we analyze their merits, seek discovery when necessary, and pursue resolution strategies aimed at protecting our client’s interests while remaining open to compromise where appropriate to save time and expense.
Following filing and service, the court may schedule hearings to consider evidence, hear argument, and decide whether to approve the requested modifications. Some matters resolve through settlement or mediated agreement prior to a contested hearing. If the court grants the petition, it issues orders reflecting the approved changes and directing steps for implementation. We assist with implementing court orders, updating trust records, and advising trustees on administration under the modified terms to ensure compliance and avoid future disputes.
We represent clients at hearings, present evidence and arguments, and engage in negotiations aimed at obtaining a favorable outcome while limiting disruption. Effective courtroom presentation and preparedness for alternative dispute resolution options help secure practical resolutions. When negotiations succeed, we prepare the necessary settlement documentation for court approval; when litigation is required, we proceed with a full presentation to support the requested modification and protect client interests.
After the court issues an order approving a modification, we work with trustees and beneficiaries to implement the changes, updating trust records, asset titles, and any related documents to reflect the new terms. Proper implementation reduces the chance of future disputes and ensures that trustees act in accordance with the court’s directives. We also advise on practical steps for ongoing administration and document retention to preserve a clear record of actions taken under the modified trust.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing asking the court to alter the terms of an existing trust when private amendment is not possible or when disputes prevent informal resolution. Petitions are used to correct mistakes, clarify ambiguous provisions, address changes in circumstances, or obtain judicial authority for significant changes that affect distributions or trustee powers. The court evaluates whether the proposed changes align with the settlor’s probable intent and public policy, balancing beneficiary rights and fair administration. A petition becomes necessary when the trust instrument lacks appropriate amendment provisions, when beneficiaries disagree, or when the settlor’s current wishes cannot be implemented through normal administrative powers. Preparing a successful petition requires a clear factual record, documentary evidence, and legal arguments that explain why a court-ordered modification best serves the trust’s purpose. Proper notice to interested parties and compliance with procedural rules are essential elements of the process.
Yes; many trusts permit nonjudicial amendments or allow the settlor, while alive, to revoke or modify the trust according to specified procedures. Additionally, beneficiaries and trustees can sometimes reach a nonjudicial settlement agreement to resolve interpretation or administrative disputes without court involvement, provided the agreement conforms to applicable law and does not violate public policy. Private resolution is typically faster, less expensive, and more private than court proceedings. However, when parties cannot agree, when the trust lacks an amendment mechanism, or when changes would significantly alter distributions or key protective provisions, court involvement may be the most reliable path. In those cases, filing a petition ensures an enforceable outcome and protects trustees who need judicial authorization before taking consequential actions under the trust.
California rules require notice to all interested parties, which generally includes beneficiaries, trustees, the settlor if alive, and anyone entitled to distribution or with an interest in the trust. Proper service ensures that parties have the opportunity to object or to participate in settlement talks. Failing to notify required individuals can delay proceedings or lead to challenges to the court’s jurisdiction over the matter. Determining exactly who qualifies as an interested party depends on the trust’s terms and the nature of the requested modification. Careful identification and service avoid later claims of inadequate notice and help create an orderly record for the court to consider when evaluating the petition’s merits and potential objections from those affected by the proposed change.
Timing varies based on complexity, whether parties agree, and local court schedules. Nonjudicial resolutions can be completed in a matter of weeks to months if parties cooperate and documentation is straightforward. A contested petition that requires evidentiary hearings, briefing, and multiple court appearances can take several months to over a year, depending on discovery needs and court availability. Early preparation, complete documentation, and efforts to negotiate can shorten the timeline. When prompt action is necessary to protect assets or prevent administration problems, courts can sometimes expedite matters, but this requires demonstrating urgency and presenting a compelling factual record to justify accelerated consideration.
Yes; beneficiaries can challenge proposed modifications if they believe the changes harm their rights, misinterpret the settlor’s intent, or contravene the trust’s terms. Challenges can raise issues such as undue influence, lack of authority, or improper notice. The court weighs objections against the evidence supporting the petition and the legal standards for modification. Successful challenges depend on the strength of the opposing party’s factual and legal arguments. To minimize the likelihood of successful challenges, petitioners should assemble strong documentary support, pursue mediation to resolve reasonable disputes, and ensure procedural compliance. Courts tend to favor solutions that protect beneficiary rights while honoring the settlor’s intent, so addressing potential objections proactively increases the chance of an orderly resolution.
Key evidence includes the trust document and any amendments, declarations from trustees and family members explaining relevant facts, financial records showing asset ownership and transfers, and correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent or administrative history. Evidence demonstrating changes in circumstances, drafting errors, or other factual bases for the proposed modification strengthens a petition. Clear timelines and documentary proof reduce ambiguity and support persuasive argumentation. Affidavits from those with direct knowledge, supporting exhibits such as deeds or beneficiary designation forms, and records of trustee actions all contribute to a credible factual record. Including comprehensive evidence that anticipates common objections helps the court evaluate the petition and reduces the risk of extended discovery or contested hearings.
Modifying a trust can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change and the assets involved. Some modifications may alter how assets are characterized for estate or income tax purposes, or affect beneficiaries’ tax situations. It is important to consider tax consequences and to coordinate with financial advisors when contemplating substantive changes to trust distribution schemes or ownership of assets. When substantial tax consequences are possible, careful planning and documentation help ensure that modifications align with broader estate and tax strategies. Courts can approve changes that are legally permissible, but practical implementation should account for tax reporting, potential liabilities, and timing considerations to minimize unintended fiscal impacts.
If a trustee refuses to take necessary actions to correct or administer the trust properly, interested parties can seek court intervention to compel performance, remove the trustee, or obtain authorization for a different course. A petition can request relief such as appointment of a successor trustee or court orders directing specific actions to protect trust assets and beneficiaries’ interests. Courts take fiduciary duties seriously and can grant remedies to enforce proper administration. Before seeking removal, courts typically examine the trustee’s conduct and any justification for the refusal. Documenting attempts to resolve the issue informally and demonstrating how the refusal harms beneficiaries strengthens the case for judicial relief. Remedies are tailored to the circumstances and aim to preserve trust value and ensure lawful administration moving forward.
A Heggstad petition is used to confirm that assets transferred in the name of the settlor should be considered trust assets, even if formal title was not properly transferred during the settlor’s lifetime. Such petitions help bring assets into the trust for administration purposes and can be relevant when trust modification petitions involve assets not clearly titled in trust name. Heggstad petitions clarify property status and reduce the risk of probate or competing claims against the assets. When trust modifications involve assets with unclear title, combining a Heggstad action with other modification requests can provide a comprehensive resolution. Demonstrating intent to include the assets in the trust through documentary evidence and trustee declarations supports a Heggstad petition and helps courts align asset ownership with the settlor’s estate plan.
After a court approves a trust modification, the order becomes the controlling document for the changed terms, and trustees must follow its directives in managing and distributing assets. Implementing the order often requires updating asset titles, trust records, and related documents such as beneficiary designations or deeds. Trustees should document each step of implementation to create a clear record for future administration and to guard against later disputes. If the court’s order includes directives for further actions, such as accountings or notifications, trustees must comply promptly. When changes affect third parties like financial institutions, trustees should provide certified copies of the order and take required steps to retitle assets. Careful follow-through ensures the modified trust functions as intended and protects trustees and beneficiaries by demonstrating compliance with the court’s judgment.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas