A Heggstad petition can be a vital step when assets intended for a trust remain titled in the name of the deceased. For San Joaquin Hills and Orange County families facing this issue, understanding how a Heggstad petition works and when to pursue it helps avoid prolonged probate and secures the transfer of property to the trust. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with estate planning matters including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and trust administration. This introduction explains the purpose and potential benefits of a Heggstad filing and sets expectations for timing and court involvement.
When property that should be held by a trust remains in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that those assets were intended to be trust property. This process allows trustees or beneficiaries to have court confirmation that title should be treated as having passed to the trust, avoiding full probate for those items. In practice, preparation includes gathering trust documents, proof of funding intent, asset records, and beneficiary information. Families in San Joaquin Hills often pursue this path to streamline administration and protect privacy while resolving technical title issues efficiently and calmly.
A Heggstad petition provides a legal remedy when formal title to assets was not retitled in the name of the trust despite the settlor’s clear intent. The petition allows the court to declare that certain assets are trust property, which can prevent those assets from being caught up in probate and may shorten the administration process. Additional benefits include preserving the decedent’s privacy, avoiding public distribution proceedings for trust assets, and ensuring beneficiaries receive property as the trust intends. This remedy is especially useful for personal property, bank accounts, or real estate that were overlooked during trust funding.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves California families with a focus on practical and thorough estate planning, trust administration, and related court filings throughout Orange County and beyond. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful document review, and tailored solutions such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certification of trust, and petitions like Heggstad filings. We work closely with clients to collect necessary documents, assemble records proving the settlor’s intent, and present a persuasive, orderly petition to the probate court when that step is needed. Our goal is to resolve title issues with minimal delay and confusion for heirs and trustees.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to confirm that certain property should be treated as trust property even though title remains in the decedent’s name. The petition typically includes evidence such as the trust document, schedules of trust property, correspondence or documentation showing intent to transfer assets, and affidavits. The outcome clarifies title and permits the trustee to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust terms without resorting to a full probate for those items. This procedure is governed by California probate rules and often requires careful organization of documentary proof.
When preparing a Heggstad petition, the petitioner compiles records that demonstrate the decedent planned for the asset to be part of the trust during their lifetime. Common supporting documents include trust schedules, beneficiary designations, bank statements showing payments into trust accounts, or contemporaneous correspondence indicating an intent to fund the trust. The petition process also notifies interested parties and gives them an opportunity to object. Successful petitions simplify administration by allowing trustees to treat the subject property as trust property, thereby aligning legal title with the settlor’s intentions and accelerating distribution to beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition seeks a court declaration that certain assets are trust property despite being titled elsewhere. The legal theory rests on evidence of the decedent’s intent to transfer assets to the trust and actions taken to that effect. The court evaluates documentation and testimony to determine if title should be recognized as belonging to the trust. This outcome can correct clerical errors, oversights during trust funding, or delayed transfers. The ruling allows trustees to administer, sell, or convey the asset under the authority of the trust without formal probate for those specific items, which saves time and expense.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires assembling core documents, drafting the petition with clear factual statements, and providing evidence of the settlor’s intent to have the asset held by the trust. Notice to heirs and beneficiaries is typically required, and the court may set a hearing to consider any objections. Evidence may include trust instruments, account records, deeds, or contemporaneous communications. Once the court issues an order, title can be treated as held by the trust and the trustee can proceed with administration consistent with the trust’s terms. Timely and accurate filing reduces complications during trust settlement.
Understanding common terms helps those pursuing a Heggstad petition follow the process confidently. Terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiaries, trust funding, petition, declaration, probate court, and title. Each term relates to the roles and legal mechanics involved in confirming that assets should be treated as trust property. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to gather supporting evidence and understand the court’s analysis. For families in San Joaquin Hills, grasping these terms enhances communication with counsel and speeds resolution of funding oversights so assets pass as intended without unnecessary delay.
A settlor is the person who creates a trust and transfers assets into it during their lifetime or by will. A Heggstad petition often centers on proving the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Documents such as the trust instrument, trust schedules, or contemporaneous notes can show that the settlor meant for particular property to be held by the trust. Establishing the settlor’s intent is essential because the court must be satisfied that the asset was meant to be governed by the trust terms rather than to pass through probate or by intestacy.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed by the trust document to hold, manage, and distribute trust property for beneficiaries according to the trust’s terms. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trustee may file the petition to secure court recognition that certain assets are trust property, enabling the trustee to act on those assets. The court evaluates the trustee’s evidence to determine whether title should be treated as held by the trust, and once confirmed, the trustee exercises the powers and duties set forth in the trust document for managing and distributing the subject property.
A beneficiary is someone designated to receive benefits from a trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have an interest in ensuring that assets intended for the trust are recognized as such so distributions reflect the settlor’s wishes. When a Heggstad petition is filed, beneficiaries are notified and can raise objections if they believe the petition is improper. If the court grants the petition, beneficiaries may receive trust property according to the trust’s distribution provisions, helping to avoid delays or public proceedings associated with probate administration.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring ownership of assets into the name of the trust so they are governed by the trust instrument. Proper funding includes retitling bank accounts, deeds, and other assets; listing assets on trust schedules; and executing beneficiary designations consistent with the trust. A Heggstad petition is a remedy when intended funding was not completed. By showing the settlor’s intent and supporting documents, the court can confirm that specific assets are trust property and allow the trustee to manage them under the trust terms without unnecessary probate.
When someone dies leaving assets that should be in a trust but remain titled in their name, families can pursue several routes. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare those assets trust property. Probate is an alternative when assets are distributed through court supervision and can be lengthier and more public. Other options include informal settlement if all heirs agree or quiet title actions when ownership disputes exist. Choosing the best path depends on the asset type, clarity of intent, whether beneficiaries agree, and the desire to avoid probate expense and privacy loss. A careful review of documents and circumstances informs the best approach.
A targeted Heggstad petition may be sufficient when clear, contemporaneous documentation shows the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust. Examples include trust schedules listing the asset, account statements reflecting trust transfers, or written correspondence referencing the transfer. When documentation is strong and beneficiaries are not disputing the status of the property, the court can often grant a Heggstad petition without the need for full probate administration. This streamlined path conserves time and resources while aligning legal title with the decedent’s estate plan.
A limited filing is frequently appropriate when heirs and beneficiaries agree about the asset’s status and there is little risk of dispute. When parties consent, a Heggstad petition can proceed more quickly, often minimizing court appearances and contested hearings. Agreement simplifies the evidentiary record because fewer objections are expected, and the court can focus on documentary proof of intent. In such situations, pursuing a narrowly tailored petition to correct title helps trustees administer trust property with minimal interruption to distribution plans and family relationships.
A comprehensive approach is advisable when the estate includes complex assets, multiple properties, or when disputes among heirs arise. In those circumstances, additional filings or coordinated proceedings may be necessary, such as inventory and appraisal, full probate, or quiet title actions. A broader legal plan ensures all potential legal obstacles are considered and that trustees are prepared to address challenges. Working through complex asset portfolios also often requires reviewing beneficiary designations, retirement accounts, and business interests to determine how each item should be handled relative to the trust.
When intent to fund a trust is unclear, or when records conflict, a more thorough legal process can be necessary to resolve uncertainties. This may include taking testimony, collecting affidavits, engaging in pre-hearing discovery, or pursuing alternate court procedures. A comprehensive route helps ensure that the court receives a full evidentiary picture and that trustees postpone no more actions than necessary. This careful, systematic approach reduces the risk of later challenges and helps protect the trustee and beneficiaries by clarifying rights and title before distributions occur.
A comprehensive legal approach protects the long-term goals of the estate plan by addressing potential title issues, conflicting documents, and beneficiary concerns proactively. It can help avoid future litigation by resolving ambiguities up front and ensuring that all necessary legal steps are completed in the correct order. For trustees and beneficiaries in San Joaquin Hills, this often means smoother administration, clearer property records, and increased confidence that distributions align with the settlor’s wishes. It also helps preserve family relationships by reducing surprises and clarifying expectations earlier in the process.
A thorough approach also helps avoid piecemeal proceedings that could increase fees and delay distributions. Addressing title defects, beneficiary questions, and funding gaps together enables more efficient court resolution and can reduce the need for multiple filings. When properly documented and supported, comprehensive filings present a persuasive record that helps the court reach a clear decision. This approach is especially valuable when estates include real property, business interests, or retirement accounts that require coordinated review to determine how each asset should be administered under the trust.
A key benefit of a comprehensive approach is that it provides trustees and beneficiaries with clear direction about ownership and distribution, reducing uncertainty and helping avoid costly mistakes. By resolving title and funding issues in a single, cohesive process, families can move forward confidently with administration tasks such as asset management, sale, or distribution. The resulting court order or settlement clarifies rights, limits future challenges, and streamlines ongoing trust administration responsibilities, which helps preserve estate value and family relationships over the long term.
Taking a comprehensive approach lowers the risk of later litigation by addressing ambiguities and potential objections early in the process. When the court makes a clear determination regarding title and the settlor’s intent, there is less basis for future disputes about the same assets. This legal certainty reduces the likelihood of costly, time-consuming contests among heirs and beneficiaries. For families, that means less stress and fewer delays in receiving distributions, and for trustees it means reduced personal exposure to claims arising from unclear property status or incomplete funding.
Collecting complete documentation is essential when preparing a Heggstad petition. Useful items include the trust document, trust schedules, deeds, bank and brokerage statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence showing the settlor’s intent to transfer assets into the trust. Having these materials organized before filing saves time and reduces the chance of delays. Clear records also strengthen the petition by showing consistent behavior and intent. For trustees in San Joaquin Hills, organizing digital and paper records in a single accessible folder helps streamline the court process and communication with interested parties.
Maintain records that show efforts to fund the trust, such as attempted transfers, signed forms, or communications with banks, title companies, or financial institutions. These records can be persuasive evidence of intent, especially when formal title changes were overlooked. Documenting dates, names, and the nature of communications strengthens the factual basis of a Heggstad petition. Accurate logs and copies of correspondence also help the court understand the settlor’s steps toward funding the trust and can shorten the time needed to reach a resolution in the probate court.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name and those items are significant enough to impact the administration or distribution of the estate. Typical scenarios include overlooked real property, bank accounts that were never retitled, or personal property excluded from trust schedules. Pursuing a petition can prevent those assets from entering full probate, help align title with the settlor’s documented wishes, and speed distributions to beneficiaries. Families seeking privacy and efficiency often find this approach beneficial compared with longer probate proceedings.
Additionally, a Heggstad petition is appropriate when the settlor clearly intended to fund the trust but the transfer was never completed due to oversight or administrative delays. It is also useful when transferring title through routine means is impractical or contested by third parties. Filing the petition can be the most efficient route to resolving title inconsistencies, particularly when documentary evidence supports the settlor’s intent. Trustees should evaluate the strength of documentation and the likelihood of objections to determine whether this tailored court filing is the right path.
Common circumstances include property left in the decedent’s name because retitling was overlooked, bank or investment accounts that still list the decedent as owner, or assets acquired shortly before death that were intended to be added to the trust. Business interests or retirement accounts with inconsistent beneficiary designations can also create the need for court clarification. In these situations, the Heggstad petition helps align legal title with the trust plan, allowing trustees to administer the specific assets under the trust without resorting to broader probate administration for each item at issue.
Real property intended for the trust but left titled in the decedent’s name is a frequent reason families seek a Heggstad petition. This situation can arise when deeds were not prepared or recorded before death, or when closing paperwork was delayed. A court declaration that the property should be treated as trust property enables the trustee to manage or transfer the real estate according to the trust terms. Resolving title issues through the petition avoids a separate, potentially costly real estate probate process and helps ensure the property’s distribution aligns with the estate plan.
Bank accounts and investment accounts sometimes remain in the decedent’s name because institution procedures were not completed or forms were misplaced. When those accounts were intended to fund the trust, a Heggstad petition can provide court confirmation so that the trustee can access or transfer the funds under trust authority. Documentation such as statements, signed transfer requests, or beneficiary designation forms can be used to show intent. Securing court recognition reduces delays in administration and helps prevent funds from being subject to broader probate proceedings.
Assets acquired shortly before death, like newly purchased vehicles, recently closed real estate, or recently opened accounts, may not have been retitled to the trust before the settlor’s passing. A Heggstad petition can address these gaps by proving the decedent’s intent to include such assets in the trust. Evidence might include purchase documents, closing statements, or contemporaneous notes. When the court confirms trust ownership, the trustee can address those assets without initiating separate probate proceedings, simplifying administration and honoring the settlor’s overall estate plan.
If you are in San Joaquin Hills or nearby Orange County communities and are dealing with trust funding gaps or title issues, local legal support can guide you through the Heggstad petition process. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman helps clients gather required documentation, prepare and file petitions, coordinate notices to interested parties, and represent clients at hearings if needed. We focus on practical, timely resolutions that aim to align legal title with the settlor’s intent while minimizing delay and expense for trustees and beneficiaries navigating these transitional matters.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers a client-focused approach to trust administration and court filings, emphasizing careful document review and clear communication. We assist with trust-related petitions, review funding records, prepare petitions that present a clear factual case to the court, and help trustees fulfill their duties responsibly. Our practice covers a broad range of estate planning tools including revocable living trusts, wills, advance health care directives, and trust modifications. Clients appreciate practical guidance that moves matters forward without unnecessary formality or delay.
Our approach includes preparing detailed petition documents, assembling supporting evidence, and ensuring proper notice to heirs and interested parties. We help trustees and beneficiaries understand court timelines, likely outcomes, and steps needed to preserve estate value while maintaining privacy. In many cases we coordinate with financial institutions, title companies, and other professionals to gather records that demonstrate intent and support the petition. This thorough preparation increases the likelihood of a favorable court determination and streamlines the administration process for involved parties.
We serve clients throughout Orange County and tailor solutions to each family’s circumstances, whether the issue involves a single overlooked bank account or multiple properties requiring coordinated review. Our work also encompasses related filings such as certifications of trust, trust modification petitions, and pour-over wills when necessary. By focusing on practical outcomes and careful documentation, we help trustees move through the filing process with confidence and enable beneficiaries to receive assets in accordance with the settlor’s plan, while minimizing unnecessary court involvement where possible.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and relevant asset records to identify which items were intended to be trust property. We then gather supporting documentation such as deeds, statements, trust schedules, and communications showing intent. After preparing the petition and required notices, we file with the probate court and provide notice to interested parties. If a hearing is necessary, we present the factual evidence and legal arguments to the court. Once the court issues an order, we assist in implementing the ruling to transfer title or confirm trust ownership as appropriate.
The initial step focuses on a thorough review of the trust document and all relevant records to assess the strength of evidence supporting a Heggstad petition. This includes evaluating trust schedules, deeds, bank and brokerage statements, and any correspondence or forms that indicate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. We identify gaps in documentation and outline the best strategy to establish trust ownership. This assessment also considers potential objections and the most efficient route to court confirmation, balancing speed with a careful evidentiary approach.
Gathering trust documents and detailed asset records is essential for a persuasive petition. We help clients locate the trust instrument, schedules, deeds, account statements, closing documents, and related correspondence. Where records are incomplete, we assist in obtaining duplicates from financial institutions or title companies. These materials form the factual foundation of the petition and are organized to show consistent intent and actions taken by the settlor to fund the trust. Comprehensive documentation reduces delays and provides the court with a clear basis for its decision.
Identifying heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties is a key early step because proper notice is required for the petition to proceed. We compile a list of persons and entities entitled to receive notice under California probate rules, prepare the necessary notice documents, and arrange service in compliance with court requirements. Proper notice reduces the chance of procedural challenges and ensures that any objections can be raised and addressed in a timely manner. Clear notice practices support an orderly and defensible petition process.
Preparing the petition involves drafting a clear statement of facts, attaching supporting documents, and setting forth the legal basis for recognizing the asset as trust property. We ensure pleadings comply with local court rules and include evidence that supports the settlor’s intent. Filing also includes submitting any required fee waivers or other court forms. After filing, the court schedules any required hearing dates and we serve notice to interested parties. Accurate preparation and timely filing help position the case for a favorable and efficient resolution.
Drafting the petition requires organizing facts chronologically, attaching key documents such as the trust instrument and account statements, and preparing affidavits or declarations that explain why the court should recognize the asset as trust property. We present the evidence to show consistent intent and to address any potential alternative explanations. Properly prepared evidentiary attachments make it easier for the court to evaluate the petition without unnecessary discovery or continuance, which can speed the process and reduce administrative expense for trustees and beneficiaries.
Once the petition and supporting documents are assembled, we file the packet with the probate court and arrange for formal notice to all interested parties according to statutory requirements. The court clerk sets deadlines and a hearing date if necessary. Timely and correct service minimizes procedural challenges and helps ensure that the court has jurisdiction to resolve the matter. This step also provides interested parties a formal opportunity to review the evidence and raise any concerns, allowing the court to make an informed decision.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence, respond to any objections, and request a judicial determination that the asset is trust property. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order confirming trust ownership, which the trustee can use to retitle property, access accounts, or proceed with distribution according to the trust. After the order, we assist with the administrative steps such as recording deeds, updating account titles, and implementing the trust’s distribution instructions so the estate plan is honored efficiently and properly.
At a hearing, the court will consider whether the evidence supports the petition. We prepare witnesses, declarations, and documentary records that demonstrate the settlor’s intent and the steps taken toward trust funding. The presentation focuses on clarity and directness so the judge can assess whether the asset should be treated as trust property. If objections arise, we address them with evidence and legal argument. A well-prepared hearing often leads to prompt orders that resolve title issues and allow trustees to proceed with administration.
After the court grants a Heggstad petition, the order becomes the primary instrument for correcting title and implementing the trust’s instructions. We assist trustees in using the court order to retitle assets, record deeds, or present orders to financial institutions to transfer accounts to the trust. Proper implementation ensures that the asset is managed or distributed under the trust’s terms and prevents it from reverting to probate. These final administrative steps complete the process of aligning legal title with the settlor’s estate plan and closing the loop on trust funding issues.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks the probate court to recognize that specific property should be treated as trust property despite title remaining in the decedent’s name. It is commonly used when assets were intended to be transferred into a revocable living trust but the formal retitling did not occur before death. The petition presents evidence of the settlor’s intent, such as trust documents, schedules, bank and closing statements, or written communications, and requests a judicial declaration to align legal title with the settlor’s estate plan. This process is distinct from full probate because it targets particular assets rather than requiring a complete probate administration. When granted, the court’s order allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms, avoiding the broader probate process for those items and often saving time and expense while maintaining privacy for the estate.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, the quality of supporting documentation, and whether interested parties object. In uncontested cases with complete records, the process can be relatively quick, taking a few weeks to a few months from filing to order. When the court requires a hearing and waiting periods for objections, the timeline may extend. Gathering records, serving notice properly, and preparing declarations all affect how long the proceeding will take. If objections arise or additional evidence is needed, the matter can take longer as the court may set multiple hearings or require discovery. Working with counsel to prepare a clear, well-documented petition and to notify interested parties properly can reduce delays and increase the likelihood of a timely resolution that allows trustees to implement the trust’s instructions.
Supporting evidence typically includes the trust instrument, schedules of trust property, deeds, account statements, closing documents, signed transfer requests, and contemporaneous correspondence showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from trustees or other witnesses describing the settlor’s actions and intentions can be especially helpful. Where direct documentary proof is limited, affidavits and other credible testimony may assist the court in determining the settlor’s intent. Organized and consistent records are persuasive to the court because they show a pattern of intent and actions toward funding the trust. The stronger and more complete the documentary record, the more likely a petition will proceed without objection, reducing the need for extended hearings or additional discovery that could prolong resolution.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties may object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property or if they dispute the evidence of intent. The petition process includes notice to interested parties so they have an opportunity to evaluate the documentation and raise objections. If objections are filed, the court will consider evidence from both sides and may hold a hearing to resolve conflicting claims or test the credibility of documents and testimony. When objections are possible, thorough preparation and open communication can help address concerns before litigation escalates. Providing clear documentation and explaining the basis for the petition often reduces the chance of contested proceedings. If objections persist, the court will weigh the evidence and issue a ruling that resolves title according to the law and the facts presented.
Not necessarily. A Heggstad petition is designed to resolve title for specific assets and can often be pursued without initiating a full probate administration. The goal is to have the court declare that particular items are trust property so trustees can manage or distribute those assets under the trust. This avoids broader probate procedures for those assets and preserves privacy for the estate. However, if many assets were left out of the trust or there are other estate issues, probate may still be required for unrelated items. Courts will evaluate each situation based on the assets at issue and the evidence presented. Where the petition is narrowly tailored and well-supported, trustees commonly obtain court orders that permit administration of the identified assets under the trust, limiting the need for full probate for those specific property items.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the case, the amount of evidence required, and whether objections necessitate hearings or extended proceedings. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs for serving notice, possible appraisal fees, and professional fees for preparing the petition and supporting documents. When cases are straightforward with complete documentation and no opposition, costs are generally lower compared to contested matters requiring hearings or litigation. Proactive organization of records and early communication with interested parties can reduce time and expense. Estimating costs early in the review process helps trustees and families plan appropriately, and many firms provide an initial assessment to give clients a clear sense of likely fees and court costs associated with the petition.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can be used for real estate when a deed intended to transfer property to the trust was not recorded or when closing paperwork did not retitle the property before the settlor’s death. In these cases, the petition asks the court to recognize the real property as trust property based on the settlor’s intent and supporting documentation such as purchase agreements, closing statements, and trust records. When granted, the court order can be recorded to correct title and enable trustees to manage or transfer the property under the trust terms. Because real estate often involves recorded title and third-party interests, careful documentation and precise pleadings are important. Ensuring proper notice to all parties with an interest in the property reduces the likelihood of disputes and facilitates a smoother transition of title consistent with the settlor’s estate plan.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the asset in question may remain in the decedent’s name and could be subject to probate or other transfer procedures. A denial typically means the court found insufficient evidence of the settlor’s intent to place the asset in the trust or found competing claims stronger. After a denial, parties may consider alternative remedies such as filing a full probate petition, pursuing a quiet title action, or seeking other appropriate legal avenues depending on the asset type and factual circumstances. Careful pre-filing assessment and gathering stronger supporting evidence can improve chances of success on reconsideration or in a revised petition. If a petition is denied, counsel can advise on next steps, including whether additional documentation, witness testimony, or alternative legal strategies would be appropriate to protect the interests of trustees and beneficiaries.
Not all interested parties must agree for a Heggstad petition to succeed, but proper notice to all interested persons is required so the court can give them an opportunity to object. If parties do object, the court will evaluate the evidence and determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property despite disputes. Agreement among beneficiaries and heirs makes the process smoother and often shorter, but the court can grant the petition over objection when the evidence convincingly shows the settlor’s intent. When disagreements exist, documenting efforts to notify and addressing objections head-on with clear records and testimony helps the court resolve competing claims. Even when parties disagree, a well-supported petition can obtain a judicial determination that clarifies title and enables trustees to proceed under the trust’s terms.
Filing and obtaining a favorable Heggstad order clarifies the trustee’s authority over the specific asset at issue, enabling the trustee to manage, sell, or distribute it according to the trust terms. The court order reduces uncertainty about the trustee’s legal power and can protect the trustee from later claims that they acted without authority. However, trustees must still follow fiduciary duties such as acting in beneficiaries’ best interests, keeping accurate records, and providing accounting where required. If a petition is contested, trustees should continue to document decisions and communications carefully while the matter is pending. Clear documentation and compliance with statutory notice requirements help preserve the trustee’s position and reduce the risk of personal liability for actions taken in good faith once the court confirms title.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas