If you are considering changes to a living trust in San Joaquin Hills, a trust modification petition can help address altered family circumstances, changed financial goals, or legal developments that affect your original plan. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists residents of Orange County with clear explanations of when a petition may be appropriate, what documentation is typically required, and how local courts handle modifications. We provide step-by-step guidance so you understand options, timelines, and likely outcomes for both minor adjustments and more significant trust revisions under California law.
A trust modification petition is often needed when the original trust no longer reflects your intentions or when unforeseen events make the current terms impractical. Whether the change involves beneficiaries, trustees, distribution schedules, or asset management provisions, it is important to approach the process methodically and with attention to legal formality. The goal is to secure an outcome that honors the grantor’s current intent while protecting heirs and trust assets from unnecessary litigation. Clear communication, up-to-date paperwork, and careful drafting reduce the risk of disputes and help preserve family relationships over time.
Filing a trust modification petition can preserve the original intentions of the grantor while adapting to life changes such as remarriage, births, deaths, changing tax laws, or new assets. A properly prepared petition helps prevent misunderstandings among beneficiaries, establishes a clear legal record of the change, and can prevent future litigation by addressing problems proactively. By documenting the reasons for modification and following court procedures, the process provides certainty in distribution and administration and protects the trust’s ongoing management under California probate and trust statutes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves families across California, including San Joaquin Hills and the greater Orange County area, with practical estate planning services and litigation support when disputes arise. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust documents, clear client communication, and disciplined case preparation for filings and hearings. Clients receive straightforward explanations of legal requirements, likely timelines, and what supporting evidence will be needed to pursue a successful modification in court. We prioritize resolving matters efficiently while protecting clients’ long-term estate planning goals.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances make the original provisions impractical, ambiguous, or inconsistent with the grantor’s present intent. California law provides specific statutory and procedural pathways for modifying trusts, which may depend on whether the grantor is alive, incapacitated, or deceased. Gathering the necessary documentation, demonstrating the reasons for change, and ensuring that notice requirements are met are essential steps. Early assessment of goals and constraints helps determine the most appropriate legal route.
Not every requested change requires formal court approval; some modifications can be implemented through trust provisions that allow amendment or through unanimous agreement of all interested parties. When a petition is required, it is usually because parties disagree, the trust lacks amendment language, or the change concerns matters that affect third-party rights. The petition process can address issues such as trustee removal or replacement, clarification of beneficiary intent, reallocation of assets, or correction of drafting errors to reflect the grantor’s current wishes and to avoid unintended distributions.
A trust modification petition asks the court to alter terms of a trust so it better matches current circumstances or the grantor’s updated intentions. Common grounds include changes in family structure, newly discovered assets, ambiguous language needing judicial interpretation, or the need to adapt to tax or creditor considerations. The petition typically outlines proposed amendments, explains factual developments that justify the change, and requests specific relief such as removing restrictive clauses, updating trustee powers, or changing distribution conditions in a way that preserves the trust’s purpose while addressing present realities.
A successful modification petition usually contains a clear statement of the relief sought, factual background showing why the current trust terms are problematic, and legal authority supporting the requested change. The process requires serving proper notice to interested parties, submitting proposed trust language or amendments, and, if necessary, presenting evidence at a hearing. Courts weigh whether the request aligns with the grantor’s intent, whether the change is equitable to beneficiaries, and whether statutory requirements for notice and capacity were satisfied before granting relief.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process and enables informed decision making. Definitions include grantor, trustee, beneficiary, fiduciary duties, petition, notice, amendment, and revocation. Clear grasp of these concepts helps you evaluate whether your trust permits amendment, whether consensus among beneficiaries is achievable, and when court intervention becomes necessary. Reviewing these terms in the context of your own documents prepares you to collect relevant evidence and to anticipate likely next steps during a petition proceeding in Orange County courts.
The grantor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. Understanding the grantor’s original intent, expressed in the trust document, is central to any petition to modify trust terms. When the grantor is alive and has capacity, some trusts allow direct amendment; when the grantor is incapacitated or deceased, courts may need to evaluate surrounding circumstances, prior communications, or corroborating evidence to determine the appropriate relief. The petition narrative typically focuses on why the modification aligns with the grantor’s current or original intent.
The trustee is the individual or institution responsible for administering the trust in accordance with its terms and applicable law. Trustee duties include managing assets prudently, providing accountings, and following distribution directions. A petition may involve requests to replace a trustee, expand trustee powers, or clarify administrative responsibilities. Courts evaluate whether changes protect beneficiaries’ interests, maintain proper stewardship of trust assets, and reflect the grantor’s anticipated governance structure.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits or distributions from the trust. Beneficiaries may have differing interests that affect willingness to consent to changes. Notice to beneficiaries is typically required in petition proceedings so they may review proposed changes and object if necessary. Courts consider how modifications will impact beneficiaries’ rights, whether changes are equitable, and whether notice and due process protections were observed before approving adjustments to distribution terms or conditions.
A petition is a formal court filing requesting specific relief regarding a trust. It sets out the legal and factual basis for the requested modification and includes proposed amended language or instructions to the court. Petitions must comply with procedural rules, provide adequate notice to interested parties, and supply evidentiary support as required. The court may grant the petition, deny it, or request additional information or mediation to resolve contested issues before a final decision is reached.
When considering a change to a trust, there are generally two pathways: an informal amendment when the trust permits it and all parties agree, or a formal court petition when there is disagreement, incapacity, or absent amendment authority. Informal amendment can be quicker and less costly when the grantor is present and the trust’s terms allow modification. A court petition provides a structured process when parties cannot reach consensus or when legal clarity is required. Each route carries different timelines, costs, and evidentiary burdens that should be weighed against your objectives and family dynamics.
If the grantor is competent and the trust document expressly permits amendments without court involvement, a limited update can be implemented through the trust’s amendment provisions. This option is appropriate when changes are straightforward, such as substituting trustees, updating contact information, or reallocating small assets. Ensuring that the amendment follows the trust’s execution formalities and that copies are distributed to relevant parties reduces the chance of later disputes. Keeping a clear record of the amendment helps preserve continuity in trust administration.
When beneficiaries and trustees agree to a change and the trust permits modification by consent, a written agreement can often accomplish the update without court involvement. This process works well for straightforward reallocations or administrative clarifications and can save time and expense. It is important that consent is informed, documented, and executed in accordance with any formal requirements set by the trust document and California law. Proper documentation minimizes uncertainty and helps finalize the update cleanly.
A court petition becomes advisable when beneficiaries disagree on proposed changes, when the grantor’s mental capacity is in doubt, or when contested claims raise complex factual issues. In such situations, comprehensive legal attention is necessary to gather evidence, meet procedural requirements, and present a persuasive case to the court. Detailed review of medical records, correspondence, and prior estate planning documents may be required to show why the requested modification serves the trust’s underlying purpose and to protect the rights of all interested parties in the process.
If the trust contains drafting errors, ambiguous language, or competing claims from creditors or other third parties, comprehensive legal analysis and court involvement are often necessary to clarify intent and to resolve disputes. Courts may be asked to construe ambiguous provisions, validate or void actions taken by trustees, or adjudicate competing beneficiary claims. A systematic approach that compiles evidence, proposes clear remedial language, and anticipates opposing arguments helps obtain durable outcomes and reduces the likelihood of future litigation.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification identifies all legal and factual issues, secures required notices, and documents the justification for changes in a manner that courts and beneficiaries can rely upon. This thoroughness reduces the risk of future challenges, ensures that any amendments align with applicable law, and clarifies fiduciary duties and distribution instructions. By addressing potential pitfalls upfront, parties often avoid costly delays and achieve outcomes that preserve the grantor’s intent and the long-term integrity of the trust.
Comprehensive preparation also improves negotiation leverage, whether the modification is pursued by agreement or through litigation. Detailed documentation helps counsel explain the rationale behind changes, facilitates settlement discussions, and provides the court with a complete factual record if a hearing is required. This methodical work protects beneficiaries’ rights and provides a solid foundation for trust administration going forward, avoiding ambiguity that could otherwise give rise to administrative confusion or conflict among heirs.
A careful modification process helps ensure that adjustments truly reflect the grantor’s objectives and leave a clear legal record for trustees and beneficiaries. That clarity minimizes future disputes and streamlines administration, since trustees can follow revised terms with confidence. When courts are asked to approve changes, a well-documented petition that ties proposed amendments to the grantor’s intent and contemporary circumstances is more likely to produce an order that withstands later challenges and provides predictable guidance for carrying out distributions and fiduciary responsibilities.
Addressing legal, procedural, and factual risks early reduces the chance that a seemingly small change will produce unintended tax implications, creditor exposure, or beneficiary disputes. Comprehensive review considers how proposals affect related documents such as wills, powers of attorney, or beneficiary designations, and it plans for contingencies. By anticipating potential objections and ensuring procedural compliance, the modification process minimizes the likelihood of protracted litigation and unwanted expense for the trust and its beneficiaries.
Before initiating any petition, collect the original trust document, signed amendments, beneficiary designation forms, trust funding records, account statements, and any related wills or powers of attorney. Also assemble correspondence that reflects the grantor’s intent and medical records if capacity is a possible issue. Comprehensive records support factual claims, demonstrate consistency of intent, and speed the court process. Detailed documentation reduces back-and-forth discovery, helps identify whether informal amendment is possible, and fosters clear communication among trustees and beneficiaries.
A trust modification should be assessed in the context of the entire estate plan, including wills, powers of attorney, tax planning vehicles, and beneficiary designations on retirement accounts and insurance. Changes in the trust may create inconsistencies elsewhere that need concurrent updates to avoid unintended results. Reviewing related documents together ensures that new trust provisions work in harmony with the rest of the plan and reduces the likelihood that assets will bypass the trust or that distributions will occur in ways the grantor did not intend.
People pursue a trust modification petition for many reasons, including changes in family dynamics such as divorce, remarriage, births, or deaths, which alter distribution goals or trustee selections. New assets or changes in estate value, tax law updates, or the discovery of drafting mistakes in the original trust can also make modification necessary. A petition can update the trust to reflect current realities, ensure fair administration, and remove ambiguities that might otherwise cause disputes among heirs or impair the trust’s intended function.
Other common motivators include concerns about trustee conduct, the need to protect vulnerable beneficiaries, or the desire to add provisions for long-term care, special needs, or charitable allocations. Petition proceedings may also be appropriate when third-party claims arise that challenge trust terms or when beneficiaries seek clarification of ambiguous language. The petition process creates an official record of the change and, if granted, produces a court order that helps guide trustees and reduce the risk of later conflict.
Typical circumstances include the grantor’s incapacity or death with unclear provisions, the need to replace or remove a trustee, beneficiaries contesting distributions, or newly discovered assets that were omitted from the original trust. Other triggers are changes in family relationships that affect equitable distribution, or ambiguities in drafting that create conflicting interpretations. In each instance, the petition process provides a formal mechanism for resolving disputes, clarifying intent, and updating the trust to reflect current expectations and legal requirements.
Events such as marriage, divorce, births, or deaths often prompt reconsideration of distribution plans. These changes can alter how assets should be shared or who is best suited to serve as trustee. A petition can realign the trust’s provisions with contemporary family structure and financial realities. When beneficiaries’ needs or circumstances evolve, revisiting the trust terms helps ensure that distributions support current priorities, such as education, care, or equitable division among heirs.
If a trustee is failing to administer the trust properly, is acting in a way that harms beneficiaries, or there is a conflict of interest, a petition can ask the court for removal or replacement. Courts consider evidence of mismanagement, breaches of fiduciary duty, or incapacity when evaluating such requests. Proper documentation of incidents, accountings, and correspondence is crucial to support claims and to demonstrate that a change serves the beneficiaries’ best administrative and financial interests under the trust’s terms.
Drafting errors, vague language, and unintended gaps in trust documents create uncertainty in administration and invite disputes. A petition can seek judicial construction to clarify ambiguous terms or request modification to correct obvious mistakes that frustrate the trust’s purpose. Courts will typically examine the trust’s text, related documents, and extrinsic evidence to determine the grantor’s intent and whether the proposed remedy accurately reflects that intent while preserving fairness to beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized assistance for trust modification matters in San Joaquin Hills and across Orange County. We help clients evaluate whether an informal amendment is feasible, gather necessary records, provide guidance on notice requirements, and prepare petitions with proposed revised language when court involvement is necessary. Our focus is on practical solutions that reduce conflict and align with the grantor’s intentions. Contact our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss how a trust modification petition might apply to your circumstances and next steps.
Choosing representation for a trust modification petition matters because the process involves nuanced legal procedures, evidentiary preparation, and careful drafting to protect beneficiaries’ rights and the grantor’s intent. Our firm helps clients navigate notice requirements, assemble supporting documentation, and draft proposed amendments or court orders that clearly state the relief sought. We work to translate complex legal standards into practical steps, keeping clients informed at each stage and prioritizing efficient resolution over unnecessary litigation whenever possible.
We place emphasis on communication and tailored planning that reflects each client’s unique family dynamics and estate planning goals. From initial assessment through potential settlement or court hearing, we coordinate with trustees, beneficiaries, and other advisors to create a cohesive strategy. This approach helps anticipate opposing arguments, preserve evidentiary strength, and streamline the petition process. Our goal is to produce modifications that are durable, enforceable, and aligned with both the trust’s stated purpose and the grantor’s current wishes.
Clients receive clear guidance on related estate planning matters that may be affected by a trust change, including updates to wills, powers of attorney, beneficiary designations, and ancillary documents like certifications of trust or pour-over wills. Addressing these related items concurrently reduces the likelihood of conflicting instructions and ensures that assets are administered according to the updated plan. We also advise on practical steps to preserve family relationships and to minimize administrative burdens for trustees and heirs moving forward.
Our legal process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents, a fact-gathering interview with the client, and an assessment of whether informal amendment is possible. If a petition is recommended, we prepare a detailed plan, draft the petition and proposed amendments, handle required notice and service, and represent clients at any hearings. Throughout the process we provide regular updates, recommend pragmatic settlement efforts where appropriate, and aim to obtain a court order that resolves disputes while preserving the grantor’s intent and the trust’s integrity.
The first step involves collecting and reviewing the trust instrument, amendments, accountings, beneficiary information, and any relevant correspondence or medical records. We assess whether the trust’s amendment clauses permit changes without court intervention, identify potential challenges, and determine the appropriate legal pathway. This evaluation clarifies timing, evidentiary needs, and anticipated costs. It also helps identify opportunities for informal resolution versus the likely need for a formal petition and prepares the client for the types of documents the court may require.
Collecting comprehensive documentation supports the factual narrative for any petition. Relevant items include the original trust and its amendments, financial statements showing trust funding, correspondence indicating the grantor’s intentions, and, when appropriate, medical records regarding capacity. Establishing a clear timeline of events and a record of communications reduces ambiguity and strengthens the presentation to the court or to opposing parties during settlement discussions. Organizing this material early facilitates efficient drafting and reduces delays.
Based on the document review, we evaluate whether the trust permits amendment by the grantor or by consent, whether notice can resolve disputes, or whether a petition is required. We consider alternative dispute resolution options, potential defenses, and the likely evidentiary burdens. This strategic evaluation shapes the drafting of the petition, identifies key witnesses and documents for support, and helps estimate potential timelines and costs so clients can make informed decisions about how to proceed.
If a petition is necessary, we draft a clear, organized pleading that states the factual basis for modification, provides proposed revised language, and requests specific judicial relief. We ensure all procedural and filing requirements are met, prepare supporting declarations and exhibits, and coordinate proper service on interested parties. Drafting includes attention to proposed orders and to any interim relief that may be appropriate. We strive to present a persuasive, well-supported petition that facilitates either settlement or judicial resolution.
The petition must describe the requested changes, present factual evidence supporting the need for modification, and attach the proposed amended language. Supporting declarations may include testimony from those with firsthand knowledge of the grantor’s intentions or professional records establishing capacity issues. Properly prepared exhibits and declarations provide the court with a complete picture and reduce the likelihood of continuances or evidentiary disputes. A clear petition also helps frame settlement talks with other parties.
After filing, parties must be properly notified according to court rules, giving beneficiaries and other interested persons an opportunity to respond. Timely, correct service preserves the court’s jurisdiction and ensures due process. If objections arise, we prepare responsive briefs, offer evidence to counter claims, and explore negotiation or mediation where appropriate to resolve disputes without an extended trial. Skilled handling of notice and objections increases the chance of an efficient and favorable resolution.
If settlement is not reached, the court will schedule a hearing to evaluate the petition and any objections. At the hearing, parties present evidence and argument supporting their positions. The court may grant the petition, deny it, or require modifications, additional evidence, or mediation. Once an order is issued, we assist with implementing the changes, updating trust records, notifying relevant institutions, and ensuring trustees have clear instructions to carry out the court-approved terms efficiently and in compliance with the order.
Preparing for a hearing includes organizing witness testimony, preparing exhibits, and anticipating opposing arguments. We focus on presenting a coherent narrative that ties the requested changes to the grantor’s intent and legal standards for modification. Clear, well-prepared testimony and documentary evidence improve the court’s ability to reach a reasoned decision. We also explore settlement opportunities before trial to avoid additional costs and to reach solutions that preserve relationships where possible.
After a court issues an order modifying the trust, practical steps are required to implement the changes: updating trust records, informing financial institutions, revising related estate planning documents, and ensuring trustees follow the new directives. We assist clients in completing these administrative tasks and in preparing any filings required to finalize changes. Proper implementation prevents confusion, ensures compliance with the court’s order, and helps trustees manage assets according to the revised plan.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing that asks a judge to alter the terms of an existing trust where circumstances require judicial intervention. Reasons for filing include ambiguity in trust language, conflicts among beneficiaries, omission of assets, changes in family structure, or concerns about the grantor’s capacity at the time of prior actions. The petition outlines proposed changes, sets forth the factual basis, and requests a court order to implement amended provisions, providing a clear legal pathway when informal amendment is not feasible. The petition process requires careful attention to procedural rules, evidence, and notice requirements so that interested parties may respond. Courts consider the grantor’s intent, any applicable statutory provisions, and whether the requested change equitably serves beneficiaries. Preparing a thorough petition involves gathering records, drafting proposed language, and anticipating objections. When granted, a judicial order clarifies the trust’s terms and guides trustees in future administration, reducing the likelihood of further disputes among heirs.
Yes, a trust can often be changed without court involvement when the trust document itself grants the grantor the power to amend or revoke the trust, and the grantor is alive and has capacity. When all interested parties agree, written consents or signed amendments may be sufficient to update trustee appointments, beneficiary designations, or administrative provisions. This informal route tends to be faster and less expensive, provided the trust’s formal execution requirements are followed and relevant financial institutions are notified to prevent inconsistencies. However, informal changes are not appropriate when beneficiaries disagree, the grantor lacks capacity, or when the trust lacks amendment provisions. In those cases, a formal petition may be required to ensure changes are valid and enforceable. Even when informal amendment is possible, documenting the rationale and distributing copies of amended documents to trustees and beneficiaries helps prevent future disputes and provides a clear record of the intended modifications.
When filing a petition to modify a trust, California rules generally require notice to interested parties, which typically includes beneficiaries, trustees, and other persons entitled to receive information under the trust. Notice must be served in accordance with court procedures so that those individuals have an opportunity to review the petition and to object if they choose. Proper notice protects due process rights and helps ensure any court order applies to all relevant stakeholders. Failing to provide adequate notice can result in delays or invalidation of filings, so careful attention to service rules is essential. If some parties cannot be located, alternative notice methods or special motions may be necessary. Documenting efforts to provide notice and obtaining waivers or consent from parties when possible can streamline the process and demonstrate good faith efforts to involve all interested persons.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, the court’s calendar, and whether parties reach a settlement. Simple matters with cooperative parties may be resolved in a matter of weeks to months, especially if informal resolution is possible. Contested petitions that require hearings, evidentiary submissions, or multiple rounds of briefing can take several months or longer to reach a final decision, particularly if appeals are possible or if additional discovery is necessary to establish facts. Preparation time for a petition includes document collection, drafting, and providing notice, which can add weeks to the timeline. Courts may schedule hearings based on their docket and the need for supplemental evidence. Clients should plan for potential timelines and consider whether mediation or alternative dispute resolution might shorten the process and reduce costs while achieving a fair and durable outcome.
The evidence needed to support a petition depends on the grounds asserted, but common items include the original trust document, any amendments, financial records showing trust funding, correspondence that sheds light on the grantor’s intent, and medical or capacity records if capacity is at issue. Declarations from witnesses with relevant knowledge of the grantor’s intent or the facts surrounding the trust’s creation may also be important. Documentary evidence that clarifies ambiguities or demonstrates changed circumstances strengthens the petition. When factual disputes arise, the court may require additional discovery, such as depositions or expert reports, to resolve questions. Thorough preparation and organization of records before filing help avoid delays and improve the clarity of the petition. Presenting a coherent factual narrative with supporting documentation increases the petition’s chance of favorable resolution, whether by settlement or court order.
Yes, a trustee can be removed or replaced through court proceedings when there is demonstrated misconduct, incapacity, conflict of interest, or failure to perform fiduciary duties. Petitioners must present evidence showing that removal is in the best interests of the beneficiaries and that the trustee’s conduct has impaired trust administration. Courts carefully examine allegations and the trustee’s record of administration, balancing the need for continuity in management against any harm caused by the trustee’s actions or omissions. Replacement may be ordered with appointment of a successor trustee, and the court can provide guidance on transition steps to protect trust assets. Proper documentation of accountings, communications, and specific instances of misconduct or breach of duty supports a removal request. When removal is contested, thorough preparation and clear presentation of evidence are essential to persuade the court that a change is warranted to safeguard beneficiaries and the trust’s purpose.
Modifying a trust can have implications for related estate planning documents, so it is important to review the entire plan together. Changes to trust distributions or trustee powers may require updates to beneficiary designations on retirement accounts, life insurance policies, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives to ensure consistency. Overlooking related documents can lead to conflicting instructions that frustrate the updated trust provisions and create administration challenges for trustees and heirs. Coordinating updates across all relevant documents at the time of modification helps ensure that assets flow according to current intentions and reduces the risk of unintended distributions. Clear communication with financial institutions, insurers, and retirement plan administrators is also advisable to implement changes and to maintain alignment between the trust and other components of the estate plan.
Common objections from beneficiaries include disputes over whether the proposed change reflects the grantor’s true intentions, concerns that the modification will unfairly reduce their share, or claims that the grantor lacked capacity or was unduly influenced when changes were made. Beneficiaries may also raise procedural objections related to inadequate notice or improper service. Courts take such concerns seriously and require sufficient evidence to address these issues before granting relief, focusing on fairness and statutory compliance. Addressing objections early through communication, mediation, or supplemental evidence can sometimes resolve disputes without a contested hearing. When objections persist, the court evaluates the credibility of evidence, consistency with the trust instrument, and whether procedural protections were observed. Providing clear documentation and transparent reasoning for the requested modification helps overcome objections and facilitates a more predictable outcome.
Alternatives to a contested court petition include negotiating a written agreement among interested parties, using mediation to reach consensus, or utilizing amendment provisions in the trust when the grantor is capable and willing to execute changes. These approaches can preserve family relations and save time and expense compared with litigation. Voluntary settlements and signed amendments that comply with the trust’s formal requirements often provide efficient solutions when parties are willing to cooperate. When alternatives are exhausted or inappropriate, pursuing a petition becomes necessary to resolve impasses. Even then, courts may encourage mediation or settlement discussions to avoid prolonged litigation. Exploring alternatives early can result in a tailored resolution that addresses each party’s concerns while limiting the costs and emotional strain associated with contested hearings.
The cost of pursuing a trust modification petition varies based on the complexity of the issues, the need for discovery, the amount of preparation required, and whether the matter settles or proceeds to a contested hearing. Simple amendments agreed to by all parties can be relatively economical, while contested petitions requiring extensive documentation, witness preparation, and court appearances can be significantly more costly. Factors such as the number of interested parties and the need for specialist records influence overall fees and expenses. To manage costs, we work with clients to identify the most efficient path, including exploring settlement, narrowing issues, and preparing clear, focused petitions. We also provide estimates based on likely scenarios and explain where expenses are driven by procedural requirements or opposing party conduct. Transparent budgeting and careful planning help clients make informed decisions about how to proceed while seeking a durable result.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas