If you are considering changing the terms of an existing trust in Santa Ana, a trust modification petition can help you update provisions to reflect changed circumstances or correct drafting problems. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients across California with petitions to modify, clarify, or revoke trust provisions when permitted by law. Our approach focuses on identifying the specific legal basis for modification, assessing the trust language, and advising on strategies that minimize family conflict while protecting your interests. We can explain whether a petition is the appropriate path and guide you through the procedural steps before the Orange County probate court.
Trust modification petitions often arise when a settlor becomes incapacitated, when tax or financial circumstances change, or when beneficiaries and trustees need formal court action to resolve ambiguities. In Santa Ana, local court procedures and timelines shape how a petition is filed and decided, so familiarity with Orange County probate practices matters. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we take time to gather facts, review trust documents such as pour-over wills or certification of trust, and recommend practical options. Our goal is to clarify expectations and support a resolution that aligns with the settlor’s likely intent and the family’s needs.
A properly prepared trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s intent while addressing unforeseen changes in family dynamics, tax law, or asset structure. Filing a petition provides a formal mechanism to resolve disputes over interpretation and to obtain an enforceable court order when parties cannot reach agreement. The benefits include legal clarity, reduced risk of future litigation, and the ability to document changes that protect beneficiaries and trustees alike. In many cases, initiating a petition early prevents further complications and provides a predictable timeline for resolving disagreements under California probate rules.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients throughout California with a focus on estate planning and trust-related litigation. Our team handles trust modification petitions, Heggstad petitions, and trust modification petitions for both individual and family trusts. We emphasize clear communication, careful document review, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s circumstances. Whether addressing a general assignment of assets to trust, a certification of trust, or contested trust provisions, our attorneys work to secure orderly outcomes through negotiation or court proceedings when needed, and we keep clients informed at each step.
A trust modification petition in California asks the probate court to change or interpret trust terms when parties cannot accomplish the change outside court. Grounds for filing include ambiguities in trust language, changes in the settlor’s capacity, mistakes in drafting, or changed circumstances that make original terms impractical. The petition process involves filing papers with the Orange County probate court, providing notice to interested parties, and presenting evidence supporting the requested modification. The court evaluates whether the proposed adjustment aligns with the trust’s intent and California trust law before issuing an order.
Petition proceedings often require factual declarations, supporting documents such as the original trust instrument, related wills, and any prior amendments, and sometimes testimony. Parties may attempt to resolve issues through mediation, settlement, or stipulated orders, which can avoid prolonged litigation. When a resolution cannot be reached, the court will weigh evidence and legal standards to determine whether modification is justified. Understanding the procedural timeline, potential costs, and practical outcomes helps clients choose the path that best protects the trust’s purpose and the interests of beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a probate court to change, interpret, or remove provisions of a trust document. It may seek correction of drafting errors, clarification of ambiguous language, or permission to alter terms because of changed circumstances or incapacity. The court’s role is to determine whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and applicable law. In California, petitions must comply with statutory requirements and provide notice to all interested parties. The process is intended to create a clear, enforceable resolution that updates the trust in a manner consistent with legal standards.
Filing a trust modification petition involves gathering the trust and related documents, identifying interested parties and beneficiaries, drafting a petition that explains the requested change and legal basis, and serving notice as required by California probate rules. The petitioner will typically submit declarations and evidence supporting the change, and the court may schedule hearings to allow parties to present arguments. Settlement discussions or mediation can occur at any stage to resolve disputes. The judge evaluates whether the modification is consistent with the settlor’s intention, statutory standards, and public policy concerns before issuing any order.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate the petition process. Definitions such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, amendment, modification, Heggstad petition, and pour-over will are central to discussions about trust changes. Knowing these terms clarifies roles and procedural obligations, including notice requirements and the types of evidence a court will consider. Reviewing a certification of trust, assignment documents, and any earlier trust amendments helps frame the legal arguments. This glossary provides plain-language explanations so clients can make informed decisions about petitions and potential outcomes.
A settlor is the person who created the trust and established its terms. The settlor’s documented intent, as reflected in the trust instrument and any valid amendments, guides the court when deciding modification petitions. When circumstances change or the original document contains ambiguous language, a petition may be filed to align the trust with what the settlor likely intended. In some cases, issues about settlor capacity or undue influence may arise and require careful factual presentation to the court to determine the proper course of action.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for administering the trust, following its terms, and acting in the beneficiaries’ interests. When a trustee seeks guidance or a modification, they may petition the court to approve changes or interpretations that clarify duties and enable proper administration. If a trustee’s actions or decisions are disputed, beneficiaries can petition the court to review or modify trust terms. Court-ordered modifications can help trustees carry out their duties without fear of later challenges when the changes reflect the trust’s objectives.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust according to its terms. Beneficiaries have the right to be notified about petitions that affect their interests and may oppose requests they believe are inconsistent with the settlor’s intent. When modifications are sought, beneficiaries often provide declarations or evidence to support their positions. Courts strive to balance the settlor’s intent with fairness to beneficiaries while ensuring that any modification adheres to California law and procedural safeguards.
A Heggstad petition seeks to have property transferred to a trust by operation of law, typically when assets intended to fund a trust were not properly titled. This petition asks the court to recognize that certain property is trust property despite documentation errors. It is a distinct but related proceeding to modification petitions, and it can be combined with other trust actions when necessary to resolve disputes about asset ownership, trust funding, or the settlor’s intent. Proper documentation and evidence are essential to support such a petition.
When considering changes to a trust, parties can pursue informal amendment procedures if the trust permits, negotiate agreements among beneficiaries and trustees, or file a formal petition in probate court. Informal modifications through signed amendments or restatements are fastest when all parties agree and the settlor has capacity. Negotiated settlements can preserve relationships and reduce costs. Filing a petition becomes necessary when parties disagree, when capacity or intent is disputed, or when the court’s intervention is needed to correct legal defects. Each option carries different timelines, costs, and risks that should be evaluated carefully.
A limited approach may be appropriate when changes are minor and all interested parties consent. If the settlor is available and able to sign an amendment or a restatement, updating trustee names, beneficiary addresses, or successor trustee provisions can often be done without court involvement. Similarly, if beneficiaries and trustees reach an agreement on resolving ambiguous language, they can document that agreement in writing. Pursuing informal resolution reduces court costs and preserves privacy, but it requires clear documentation and careful attention to the trust’s amendment clauses and California legal requirements.
Sometimes assets can be properly titled or transferred into the trust without seeking court approval, avoiding formal petitions. For instance, retitling real property or transferring bank accounts with appropriate documentation can fund a trust as intended. Coordination with financial institutions, review of beneficiary designations, and preparing pour-over wills or certification of trust can resolve funding issues. However, when ownership disputes or drafting errors are present, or when a settlor lacks capacity, the limited approach may not be effective and a petition could be necessary to secure clear title and legal recognition of trust assets.
Comprehensive legal support is important when disputes involve settlor capacity, alleged undue influence, or competing beneficiary claims. These matters often require detailed factual investigation, medical or financial records, and carefully drafted pleadings to present a persuasive case to the court. A thorough approach helps identify all interested parties, gather necessary evidence such as medical declarations or trust histories, and develop procedural strategies that aim to protect the trust’s integrity. When relationships are strained and legal positions conflict, comprehensive representation can reduce the risk of later challenges and promote orderly resolution.
When trusts involve assets across multiple jurisdictions, retirement accounts with complex beneficiary rules, or potential tax consequences, a comprehensive legal review becomes essential. Modifying a trust without addressing related tax or title matters can create unintended liabilities or fail to achieve the intended estate planning result. A careful analysis considers retirement plan trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, or retirement plan trust documents and ensures any proposed modification aligns with tax planning goals and applicable rules. This holistic review helps avoid costly oversights and positions clients for predictable outcomes.
A comprehensive approach addresses legal issues, asset titling, and family dynamics together, producing solutions that are durable and administrable. It reduces the likelihood of future disputes by ensuring that modifications are legally sound and properly recorded. Coordinating with financial institutions, preparing supporting documents like certifications of trust or pour-over wills, and communicating with beneficiaries can streamline administration and provide clarity. The result is a cohesive plan that protects the trust’s purpose while offering beneficiaries and trustees a clear path forward under California law.
Taking a broad view also identifies potential pitfalls such as inconsistent beneficiary designations or unfunded trust assets that could undermine the intended outcome. Addressing these matters during the petition process preserves the settlor’s goals and reduces the need for later corrective actions. In addition, comprehensive representation often includes negotiation and alternative dispute resolution options that can save time and expense compared with contested litigation. For families in Santa Ana and throughout Orange County, this holistic service supports both legal clarity and practical administration.
When a petition is prepared with attention to evidentiary support, notice requirements, and procedural detail, parties obtain greater legal certainty in the court’s decision. A well-documented petition that anticipates likely objections and addresses the settlor’s intent reduces the chance of protracted appeals or subsequent contests. By resolving ambiguities and securing a court order that reflects the trust’s proper interpretation, beneficiaries and trustees can move forward with confidence. This reduces the administrative burden and preserves assets that might otherwise be spent on extended disputes.
Comprehensive work ensures that the trust is administered in a way that aligns with the settlor’s original goals and current circumstances, from lifetime care provisions to final distributions. Addressing related documents such as a revocable living trust, pour-over will, or general assignment of assets to trust at the same time helps ensure consistency. This protects the assets and clarifies trustee responsibilities, which benefits all parties by reducing confusion and the risk of mismanagement. The result is smoother administration and greater predictability for beneficiaries.
Begin by assembling the trust document, any amendments, pour-over wills, certifications of trust, deeds, account statements, and related correspondence. Having these records ready makes it easier to assess whether a petition is needed and to craft persuasive declarations. Documentation helps establish the settlor’s intent and the timeline of events that led to the requested change. It also allows counsel to identify unfunded assets that may require parallel actions, such as a Heggstad petition or retitling efforts, which can prevent delays during the court process.
Timing matters for petitions; California procedural rules dictate notice periods and hearing schedules that affect how quickly a matter resolves. When trusts involve assets or beneficiaries in multiple states, coordinating filings and addressing differing rules may be necessary. Evaluating the benefits of immediate court action versus negotiation or supplemental estate planning can inform a cost-effective strategy. Careful planning helps avoid rushed filings and ensures the petition is supported by complete evidence, which increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Consider a petition if trust language is ambiguous, if there are disputes about the settlor’s intent, or if changes in circumstances—such as a beneficiary’s changed needs or tax law updates—make existing terms impractical. Petitions also address problems like incorrect asset titling, conflicts over trustee decisions, or errors in drafting that affect distribution outcomes. When informal amendments are not possible because the settlor lacks capacity or parties cannot agree, the court provides a formal avenue to adjust terms in a way that is enforceable and transparent.
A petition can be appropriate when you need certainty about asset ownership or when competing claims threaten efficient administration. For example, a Heggstad petition can confirm that certain assets belong to the trust despite titling mistakes, and a modification petition can update trust provisions for changing family or financial circumstances. Courts review evidence and may permit adjustments that best carry out the settlor’s likely intent, offering a reliable mechanism to resolve disputes and safeguard beneficiaries’ interests for the long term.
Typical circumstances include drafting mistakes that lead to ambiguous distribution clauses, omitted assets that require recognition as trust property, changes in family structure such as divorce or births that affect distributions, or the settlor’s incapacity where original plans no longer function as intended. Trustees may also request judicial interpretation when faced with conflicting instructions or competing beneficiary claims. Recognizing these triggers helps families address potential problems sooner and decide whether negotiation or a court petition is the most practical path forward.
When the trust contains language that can be interpreted in more than one way, a modification petition may seek clarification or a judicial construction to resolve competing interpretations. Ambiguities often arise from drafting errors, unclear beneficiary categories, or inconsistent amendment language. Clarifying the trust through a court order helps trustees act with confidence and reduces the risk of later disputes. Gathering evidence about the settlor’s intent and the context of the document’s drafting supports the petition and assists the court in reaching an appropriate decision.
If assets intended to be in the trust were never properly retitled, a Heggstad petition or related trust action may be necessary to confirm that those assets belong to the trust. Mistakes in beneficiary designations on retirement accounts or failure to execute deeds to transfer real property can disrupt estate plans. Addressing funding issues alongside a modification petition ensures that the trust functions as intended and that administration proceeds without surprise claims or probate complications.
Life events such as divorce, remarriage, significant health changes, or financial reversals can make existing trust provisions impractical or unfair to beneficiaries. When agreed-upon updates cannot be achieved informally, filing a petition can adapt the trust to reflect present-day realities while maintaining legal enforceability. Courts look for solutions that honor the settlor’s likely preferences and ensure the trust remains an effective tool for managing assets and supporting beneficiaries under changing conditions.
For Santa Ana residents facing trust disputes or considering a modification petition, local representation helps navigate Orange County probate procedures and timelines. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offer counsel on filing petitions, preparing declarations, and coordinating notice to beneficiaries and trustees. We work to identify practical resolutions that minimize conflict and protect assets. Clients can expect straightforward guidance about the process, the likely steps involved, and how to prepare evidence and documentation to support a successful petition or negotiated outcome.
Choosing legal representation for a trust modification petition matters because careful preparation affects outcomes and costs. Our firm provides personalized attention to each case, reviewing trust documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related estate planning instruments. We focus on clear communication, timely filings, and strategies that emphasize resolution where possible. Our goal is to be a steady resource through negotiations and court proceedings, helping clients understand options and make informed decisions as the matter progresses.
We assist with detailed drafting of petitions and supporting declarations, coordination of notice to all interested parties, and preparation for hearings in Santa Ana and Orange County. Practical knowledge of local procedures and the types of evidence courts expect can reduce delays and help secure a durable result. Whether the matter points toward settlement or requires litigation, we work to advance the client’s objectives while preserving relationships when possible and protecting the assets that the trust is intended to manage.
Clients receive clear guidance on related estate documents such as certifications of trust, general assignments of assets to trust, and HIPAA authorizations that may be needed to obtain medical or financial records. We also coordinate with financial institutions and other counsel when retirement plan trusts or irrevocable life insurance trusts are implicated. Our practical, methodical approach helps ensure petitions are supported by complete documentation and persuasive factual presentation to the court.
Our process begins with a comprehensive case review to identify the trust documents, interested parties, and factual issues. We gather evidence, prepare the petition and declarations, and ensure proper service and notice under California probate rules. When possible, we explore negotiation or mediation to resolve disputes efficiently. If court proceedings are necessary, we file the petition, present factual and legal arguments, and advocate for orderly remedies such as modifications, confirmations, or Heggstad relief. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timing, options, and potential outcomes.
The first step is to collect all relevant documents and conduct interviews to establish the history and goals related to the trust. This includes reviewing the trust instrument, any amendments, related wills, deeds, account statements, and previous communications among parties. We identify interested persons and potential conflicts, obtain necessary authorizations such as HIPAA releases if medical issues are relevant, and create a litigation or negotiation plan that matches the client’s priorities. A thorough start sets the stage for a focused petition.
We thoroughly review the trust document, certification of trust, assignment records, and any prior amendments to confirm the relevant provisions and potential defects. Gathering supporting evidence such as medical records, financial statements, or witness declarations helps build a persuasive record. Properly organized evidence supports petitions to clarify intent, address capacity concerns, or confirm that assets belong to the trust. Clear documentation reduces surprises during hearings and strengthens the client’s position when negotiating with other parties.
Identifying and notifying all interested parties is essential to comply with California probate procedure and to avoid challenges based on lack of notice. We prepare a list of beneficiaries, nominees, trustees, and other parties who must receive formal notice of the petition. Timely and correct service reduces procedural risk and ensures that the court can proceed without delays. In some cases, service methods require additional steps such as publication or special proof of service when parties cannot be located.
After preparing the petition, declarations, and supporting exhibits, we file the papers with the appropriate Orange County probate court and serve all required parties. The court sets deadlines for responses and schedules hearings as necessary. During this stage we may engage in settlement discussions, provide supplemental briefing, and handle any contested discovery or evidentiary matters. The goal is to resolve as much as possible without trial while preserving the client’s rights and preparing a strong record for the judge if unresolved issues remain.
Many disputes can be narrowed or resolved through negotiation or mediation, which saves time and expense while limiting family conflict. We evaluate settlement proposals, draft stipulations and agreed orders when appropriate, and seek creative solutions that reflect the settlor’s likely intentions. When agreements are possible, we memorialize them in court-approved orders to create binding, enforceable results and avoid future litigation. Mediation also allows parties to preserve relationships and reach tailored outcomes that a judge may not be able to order.
When hearings are necessary, we prepare declarations, exhibits, witness testimony, and legal briefing to support the petition. Preparation includes coordinating with medical or financial professionals for affidavits, drafting direct and rebuttal declarations, and anticipating opposing arguments. Thorough preparation helps present the client’s position clearly to the judge and increases the likelihood of a favorable resolution. We also advise on courtroom procedures and practical presentation strategies to make the record complete and persuasive under California standards.
Once the court issues an order modifying or interpreting the trust, we implement the decision by preparing documents to reflect the change, assisting with retitling of assets, and advising trustees on administration under the new terms. If the order requires further actions, such as distribution plans or accounting steps, we help ensure compliance with the judgment. When necessary, we also handle appeals or enforcement matters to protect the client’s rights and to carry out the trust’s revised objectives effectively in practice.
After obtaining a court order, it is important to update trust records and retitle assets in accordance with the decision. This includes preparing deeds for real property, coordinating with financial institutions to transfer accounts, and updating beneficiary designations where appropriate. Proper implementation prevents future disputes and ensures trustees can administer the trust under the clarified terms. We assist with these administrative tasks to minimize delays and to confirm that the trust functions as intended following the court’s direction.
We provide follow-up guidance to trustees and beneficiaries on ongoing administration, including preparing accountings, advising on distribution timing, and helping to address any further questions that arise from the modification. If additional estate planning updates are advisable, such as drafting new powers of attorney, HIPAA authorizations, or trust amendments, we can assist with those documents as well. Ongoing advice helps ensure the trust remains aligned with family needs and legal requirements over time.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change, interpret, or correct a trust’s terms when parties cannot accomplish those changes outside of court. You should consider filing a petition when trust language is ambiguous, when there are disputes among beneficiaries or trustees, when the settlor lacks capacity and an amendment is not feasible, or when asset titling problems require judicial recognition. The petition process provides a binding court order that clarifies rights and responsibilities for trustees and beneficiaries. Preparing a petition involves assembling the trust and related documents, drafting declarations that explain the factual basis for the requested change, and complying with California notice requirements to interested persons. The court evaluates whether the requested modification is consistent with the settlor’s likely intent and statutory standards. It is often helpful to explore settlement or mediation before filing, but when parties cannot agree, the petition is a reliable way to obtain legal clarity.
Determining whether a disputed asset is part of a trust depends on how the asset was titled, any transfer documents, and the settlor’s intent as evidenced by the trust and related records. A Heggstad petition may be necessary when property was meant to fund the trust but was never retitled. In such cases, declarations, deeds, bank statements, beneficiary designation records, and contemporaneous communications can support the claim that the asset should be treated as trust property. Courts review the totality of evidence to decide whether to recognize an asset as trust property. Clear documentation and timely action are important. If the asset involves retirement accounts or other complex holdings, additional steps such as coordinating with plan administrators may be required to ensure the trust’s interests are protected and to avoid probate or tax complications.
When reviewing a modification petition, the court considers documentary evidence such as the trust instrument, any amendments, related wills, deeds, and financial records. The court also evaluates factual declarations from parties and witnesses, medical records if capacity is at issue, and any contemporaneous communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Credible facts that establish the context and purpose of the trust are central to the court’s decision. Legal standards require careful presentation of evidence that supports the requested change. The petition should explain why the modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent or corrects a legal defect. Demonstrating notice to all interested parties and addressing potential objections proactively strengthens the petition and helps the court reach a clear and enforceable outcome.
Beneficiaries can challenge a modification if they believe the court’s order was not supported by evidence or if proper procedures were not followed. Grounds for challenge may include lack of notice, errors in the court’s factual findings, or new evidence suggesting the modification was inappropriate. California law provides mechanisms for appeal or post-judgment relief, but such challenges require timely filings and factual or legal bases that can persuade a reviewing court. Because appeals and post-judgment disputes consume time and resources, thorough preparation and clear documentation at the petition stage reduce the likelihood of successful challenges. When parties reach a stipulated resolution that is approved by the court, that agreement typically creates a durable outcome that is more difficult to overturn than unilateral actions without court approval.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Orange County varies based on the complexity of the issues, the number of interested parties, and whether disputes are contested. Simple matters with agreement among parties can be resolved relatively quickly, whereas contested petitions that involve capacity questions, extensive evidence, or multiple parties may take several months to a year or longer to reach resolution. Court scheduling and mandatory notice periods also influence timing. Engaging in settlement efforts or mediation can shorten the process if parties are willing to negotiate. Early organization of documents, prompt service of notice, and proactive resolution of procedural issues reduce delays. Your attorney can provide a more specific estimate after reviewing the case details and the anticipated scope of evidence and hearings.
Yes, there are alternatives to filing a petition, including informal amendments by the settlor if capacity exists, negotiated agreements among beneficiaries and trustees, and mediation to resolve disputes. When all interested parties consent, a signed amendment or restatement can often achieve the desired changes without court involvement. These approaches preserve privacy and reduce costs when feasible and appropriate. However, when the settlor lacks capacity, parties disagree, or legal defects must be corrected to protect the trust’s function, a court petition becomes necessary. Choosing the right path depends on the facts, the trust’s amendment provisions, and the parties’ willingness to cooperate. An initial consultation can clarify whether informal resolution is realistic or whether a petition is advisable.
Costs for a trust modification petition include court filing fees, service and notice expenses, and legal fees for preparing petitions, declarations, and supporting evidence. The total expense depends on the complexity of the matter, the need for expert affidavits or medical records, the number of hearings, and how much contested litigation is required. Settlement or mediation can reduce overall costs compared with prolonged contested litigation. Discussing fee structures and likely expenses early helps clients plan and avoid surprises. In some cases, parties agree to share costs or resolve matters through stipulated orders that reduce courtroom time. A clear strategy that prioritizes efficient evidence gathering and explores negotiated solutions can help manage legal fees while achieving durable outcomes.
A Heggstad petition is commonly used when assets intended for a trust were not properly retitled, and it asks the court to recognize those assets as trust property despite titling defects. It often complements a trust modification petition when ownership and administration issues overlap. Filing a Heggstad petition can eliminate obstacles to funding the trust and allow the trustee to administer assets consistent with the trust’s terms. Combining Heggstad relief with modification or interpretation petitions ensures that the court’s orders address both the legal construction of trust terms and the practical question of which assets are subject to them. Proper evidence such as transfer documents, statements, and communications demonstrating intent to fund the trust supports such petitions and improves the chance of a favorable court ruling.
While a petition is pending, trustees should follow the trust’s existing terms to the extent possible and avoid taking actions that could be construed as inconsistent with any party’s rights. Trustees should preserve assets, maintain clear records, and refrain from distributions that could be disputed. Communicating with beneficiaries about the process and providing requested information, while protecting sensitive records, helps maintain transparency and reduces conflict. Trustees may also need to secure documentation such as account statements and property records and obtain necessary authorizations like HIPAA releases if medical evidence is relevant. Consulting counsel before making significant decisions ensures compliance with fiduciary duties and protects trustees from claims of improper administration during litigation.
If the settlor is incapacitated, preparing a petition requires careful collection of medical records, statements from treating providers, and declarations from witnesses about the settlor’s prior intent and capacity history. HIPAA authorizations and other releases may be necessary to obtain medical evidence that supports the petition’s factual basis. These records help the court determine whether the trust should be modified given current circumstances and past intentions. Coordinating with caregivers, family members, and treating physicians can facilitate thorough documentation. Where appropriate, a guardian nomination or related conservatorship context may influence the strategy. Careful planning, prompt collection of records, and clear presentation of the settlor’s intent and best interests give the petition the strongest factual foundation possible.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas