A Heggstad petition can resolve transfer and title issues following the death of a trustmaker, and the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Walnut Village residents with clear, practical guidance. Located in California and serving clients across Orange County, our firm helps families understand when a petition is needed, how it affects trust administration, and the necessary documentation. If you are facing property recorded in the decedent’s name but intended to be held in trust, a Heggstad petition may be the solution to reflect the trust’s ownership. Contact our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss whether filing a petition is appropriate for your situation and next steps to protect assets and beneficiaries.
Many people encounter obstacles when real property remains titled in a deceased person’s name despite the existence of a trust. A Heggstad petition provides a legal pathway to have court recognition that certain property should be treated as trust property for title purposes. Our Walnut Village practice helps clients prepare the factual record, gather trust documentation such as a revocable living trust, certification of trust, and pour-over will, and present the petition effectively to the court. This service reduces delays in real estate closings and clarifies ownership for banks, title companies, and family members, helping keep trust administration moving forward without unnecessary disputes.
A Heggstad petition can be decisive when title to property does not accurately reflect trust ownership, which often occurs after death. Pursuing this route can prevent protracted disagreements, enable clean title transfers, and allow beneficiaries to access trust assets in a timely manner. For real estate transactions, banks and title companies frequently require a clear court determination before issuing title insurance or allowing a sale to proceed. The process also provides a formal record that the decedent intended certain assets to flow under the terms of the trust, reducing the potential for conflicting claims and helping trustees fulfill their duties with legal clarity and reduced risk of future litigation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused estate planning and trust administration services to clients in Walnut Village and throughout California. Our approach emphasizes careful preparation of trust documentation, attention to recorded title issues, and collaborative resolution when property is not properly transferred. We guide clients through the Heggstad petition process by assembling the trust instruments, drafting factual declarations that support the petition, and coordinating with title companies and courts to achieve timely resolutions. Practical communication, respect for family dynamics, and thorough documentation are central to how we handle these matters on behalf of trustees and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used to establish that certain property, although titled in the name of a deceased person, is in fact trust property and should be treated as such for transfer and title purposes. This procedure typically requires submitting the trust instrument or certification of trust, evidence showing intent to include the asset in the trust, and factual statements from the trustee outlining why the court should recognize the trust’s interest. The petition creates a judicial determination that assists title companies and other third parties in accepting the trust as the rightful owner and allows the trustee to manage or transfer the property in accordance with trust terms.
The practical benefit of a Heggstad petition is that it often avoids the need for a full probate administration when the only issue is title or record discrepancies. Courts review the documentation and declarations to confirm that the decedent intended to hold the asset in trust and that the trustee has authority to act. When successful, the petition will produce an order recognizing the trust’s ownership, enabling record changes and facilitating sales or refinancing. Because the process requires careful evidence gathering and precise pleading, many trustees find it helpful to have legal assistance in preparing a persuasive petition and accompanying declarations.
A Heggstad petition is a specialized court action named after a case that allows trustees to seek judicial confirmation that specific assets should be treated as trust property despite being recorded in the decedent’s name. This remedy is commonly used for real property and other titled assets where the public record does not reflect the trust’s interest. The petition explains the factual and legal basis for the requested order, provides copies or summaries of trust instruments, and includes declarations from the trustee and other witnesses as needed. The court evaluates the evidence and issues an order that clarifies title for third parties and supports the trustee’s authority to manage or dispose of the asset under trust terms.
Successful Heggstad petitions depend on clear documentation and a well-organized factual record. Essential elements typically include a copy or certification of the trust, declarations from the trustee describing how and why the asset should be treated as trust property, proof of the decedent’s trust ownership intent, and supporting evidence such as closing statements or correspondence. The petition must also comply with local court rules, including proper service on interested parties and any required notice periods. Attention to these details reduces the risk of objections and helps the court reach a timely decision that facilitates title corrections and trust administration.
Understanding the terminology used in Heggstad petitions makes the process more accessible for trustees and beneficiaries. Common terms include trust instrument, trustee, beneficiary, record title, certification of trust, pour-over will, and order confirming trust ownership. Each term relates to the roles and documents required to demonstrate that a given asset belongs to the trust. Familiarity with these concepts helps trustees gather the correct paperwork and anticipate what courts and title companies will require when a petition is filed to correct recorded ownership and facilitate trust administration and transfers.
A trust instrument is the foundational legal document that creates a trust and sets out its terms, including the identity of the grantor, trustee, beneficiaries, and instructions regarding asset management and distribution. For a Heggstad petition, the trust instrument or a certification of trust is often a central piece of evidence used to show that the decedent intended certain property to be held in trust. Presenting clear excerpts or a certification of the trust’s relevant provisions helps the court and title companies understand the trustee’s authority and the trust’s scope with respect to the asset at issue.
A trustee declaration is a sworn statement by the trustee outlining facts that support the petition, such as how and when the asset was intended to be included in the trust, the trustee’s authority under the trust terms, and any relevant communications or transactions. This declaration helps the court evaluate the factual basis for the petition and provides narrative context for documentary evidence. A thorough trustee declaration addresses chain-of-title issues, explains discrepancies in recorded ownership, and ties the facts to the legal grounds for recognizing the trust’s interest in the property.
A certification of trust is a condensed document that confirms the existence and basic terms of a trust while omitting private details, allowing third parties to verify the trust without seeing the entire trust instrument. Title companies and financial institutions commonly accept a certification of trust to verify the trustee’s authority during transactions. When filing a Heggstad petition, a certification of trust can be submitted alongside the petition to demonstrate that the trust holds the asset and that the trustee has legal authority to act, helping streamline the court’s review and satisfy third-party requirements.
An order recognizing trust ownership is the court’s formal determination that a specified asset should be treated as trust property for title and transfer purposes. Issuance of such an order typically follows a Heggstad petition when the court finds the necessary evidence demonstrates the decedent’s intent and the trustee’s authority. That order provides the documentation title companies and recording offices rely on to update public records, issue title insurance, or allow sales and refinances, thereby resolving the disconnect between recorded title and trust ownership.
When property remains recorded in a deceased person’s name, trustees and beneficiaries can consider different remedies, including a Heggstad petition, probate administration, or negotiation with title companies for quiet title or corrective deeds. A Heggstad petition often offers a narrower, faster route tailored to recognizing trust ownership without full probate, making it well-suited when the trust is otherwise valid and the issue is limited to recorded title. Probate may be necessary when assets lack trust documentation or when intestacy applies. Understanding the pros and cons of each path helps families choose the most efficient way to clear title and finalize estate matters.
A limited approach through a Heggstad petition is appropriate when the trust exists and the only obstacle is that an asset remains recorded in the decedent’s name. In those cases, the petition focuses on demonstrating the trust’s ownership and clarifying title for creditors, buyers, and banks. Because the remedy addresses the specific title discrepancy rather than opening a broad court administration, the process can be more efficient and less invasive for families who already have trust documents in place. This option preserves trust privacy while resolving the record ownership issue for practical transactions like sales or refinancing.
A Heggstad petition tends to proceed smoothly when beneficiaries and other interested parties accept the trustee’s position and do not object to recognizing the trust’s interest. Agreement among interested parties reduces the chance of contested hearings and accelerates court approval. Even when notice is required, a lack of opposition simplifies the factual presentation and lowers the chance of extended litigation. In such cooperative situations, the petition serves as a formal confirmation that resolves title issues while keeping administration focused on the trustee’s responsibilities rather than protracted disputes among family members.
When title records reveal complex histories, competing claims, or potential flaws in trust formation, a comprehensive legal review becomes essential before filing a Heggstad petition. Such situations may involve previous transfers, liens, or questions about the decedent’s capacity when the trust was created. A broader review allows the trustee to identify documentary gaps, assess risk of objections, and consider alternative remedies like negotiated settlement or supplemental pleadings. Preparing stronger evidentiary support and anticipating defenses increases the likelihood of court approval and minimizes delays or subsequent challenges to the trustee’s authority.
If beneficiaries or other interested parties dispute the trust’s terms or the trustee’s actions, a comprehensive legal strategy is necessary to manage objections and protect fiduciary duties. In contested situations, counsel may need to pursue additional discovery, prepare for evidentiary hearings, or recommend alternative dispute resolution to resolve conflicts without protracted litigation. Detailed legal analysis helps clarify rights, evaluate potential claims, and design a court filing that anticipates objections, reducing the risk of adverse rulings and guiding trustees through the complexities of contested trust administration.
Taking a comprehensive approach to title discrepancies and trust administration helps avoid downstream complications and ensures that the trustee’s actions are well supported. By thoroughly documenting the trust, gathering supporting declarations, and addressing potential third-party concerns in advance, trustees can obtain orders that are more readily accepted by title companies and recording offices. This diligence reduces the likelihood of re-litigation, streamlines transactions like sales or refinances, and helps trustees meet fiduciary responsibilities with confidence, all while preserving the privacy of trust contents to the extent possible under applicable rules.
Comprehensive preparation also builds a stronger record in case of disputes, providing clear evidence of the decedent’s intent and the trustee’s authority. That strength can shorten court proceedings, limit discovery disputes, and create a clearer pathway for resolving conflicting claims. When trustees anticipate and address potential objections proactively, the result is usually faster resolution, reduced expense over time, and a more predictable outcome for beneficiaries, preserving assets and family relationships by reducing uncertainty around title and distribution matters.
A comprehensive filing strategy improves the likelihood that title companies will accept the court’s order and issue title insurance or permit closings to proceed, ensuring assets can be sold or refinanced in accordance with the trust. Thoughtful assembly of trust documentation, factual declarations, and any required supporting materials reduces procedural objections and provides clarity for lenders and buyers. This readiness accelerates transactions that depend on clear title and reduces the risk of delays that can increase costs or threaten favorable market opportunities for trustees handling trust-owned property.
Careful preparation and comprehensive presentation of the trust’s background and the trustee’s authority help minimize the risk of future challenges to actions taken under the order. A full factual record and clear legal arguments make it harder for later claimants to reopen settled title questions or challenge distributions. This stability benefits beneficiaries by making the administration process more predictable, protecting trust assets from unnecessary depletion by litigation, and helping trustees fulfill their duties with a defensible record that supports their decisions and protects their liability exposure.
Collecting the full trust instrument or a properly prepared certification of trust before beginning a Heggstad petition streamlines the process and helps avoid delays. Ensure you have accurate copies of the trust, any amendments, and related documents such as a pour-over will or certification of trust. Also assemble closing statements, deeds, and correspondence that show the asset was intended to be part of the trust. Having these materials ready supports a clear factual narrative in the petition and reduces the chance that the court or title company will request supplemental evidence.
Early communication with title companies, banks, and other interested parties can reveal what documentation they require and help shape the petition to meet those expectations. Inform beneficiaries and potential objectors about the planned filing so they have notice and the opportunity to raise concerns. Addressing foreseeable issues before filing reduces the risk of objections or requests for additional proof, making the court proceeding smoother and increasing the likelihood that the order will be readily accepted in subsequent transactions.
Consider a Heggstad petition when real property or other titled assets are recorded in the decedent’s name despite trust documentation indicating intent to hold the asset in trust. This situation commonly arises after a change in ownership was not properly recorded, when deeds were not transferred, or when the trust was funded informally. Filing a petition can provide a judicial determination that clarifies ownership and allows trustees to proceed with sales, refinancing, or distribution to beneficiaries without initiating full probate, which can be time-consuming and public compared to targeted petitions that focus on title recognition.
Other reasons to consider this service include pending real estate transactions that require clear title, disputes over whether a particular asset belongs to the trust, or when third parties such as banks or title insurers request a court order to proceed. A Heggstad petition can also be appropriate when recording offices need an order to accept a change in title or when beneficiaries seek formal confirmation of ownership to avoid future conflicts. The remedy balances efficiency with legal clarity and often preserves privacy relative to broader probate proceedings.
Typical circumstances include a house that was always intended to be held in a revocable living trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name, retirement accounts showing inconsistent beneficiary designations, or deeds that were never recorded properly. These circumstances are especially common where a grantor moved assets into a trust informally or where administrative oversights left records unchanged. In each case, a Heggstad petition helps align public records with the trust maker’s documented intent, clarifying ownership for lenders, title companies, and heirs and enabling the trustee to manage, transfer, or sell assets in accordance with the trust.
When deeds or transfers intended to fund a trust were not recorded, the property may appear to be owned by the decedent rather than the trust. This discrepancy can impede closings, refinancing, and effective trust administration. A Heggstad petition can explain the circumstances of the intended transfer and request a court order recognizing the trust’s interest, enabling necessary corrections to public records and facilitating subsequent transactions that depend on clear title. Gathering supporting documents and witness statements is key to demonstrating intent and resolving the issue.
Title companies and lenders may refuse to insure or process transactions when title appears inconsistent with trust documents, often requesting a court order to proceed. In those cases, a Heggstad petition can satisfy the title company’s requirements by providing a judicial determination recognizing trust ownership. This judicial confirmation helps clear the way for sales, refinances, and transfers, and reduces the administrative burden on trustees who otherwise face repeated requests for additional documents or legal opinions before a transaction will move forward.
Errors or omissions in public records can leave assets appearing in the decedent’s name even though trust instruments show a different intent. Such discrepancies can arise from clerical mistakes, delayed recordings, or transfers that were not completed. A Heggstad petition allows the court to review the trust documentation and take judicial action to recognize the trust’s interest, reconciling the trust’s internal records with public documentation so trustees and beneficiaries can proceed confidently with administration and disposition of the asset.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves Walnut Village and nearby communities with practical legal support for trust administration and title correction petitions. We guide trustees through collecting documents, preparing clear declarations, and presenting the petition to the probate court so that public records reflect the trust’s intended ownership. Whether you are dealing with a single parcel of real estate or multiple assets recorded inconsistently, our team helps create a complete factual record that courts and title companies will accept, minimizing delay and helping trustees fulfill their duties responsibly while protecting beneficiary interests.
Choosing a firm familiar with trust administration and title issues helps ensure that a Heggstad petition is prepared and presented accurately. Our practice emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, careful assembly of trust instruments and supporting records, and coordination with title companies to understand their requirements. That preparation increases the likelihood that courts will issue orders that third parties accept, enabling timely sales or refinances and reducing administrative friction for trustees handling trust property in Walnut Village and nearby communities.
We assist clients by drafting persuasive declarations, organizing documentary evidence, and handling the procedural aspects of filing and serving the petition in compliance with local court rules. Early engagement allows us to identify potential obstacles, recommend steps to strengthen the record, and liaise with third parties who need assurances before completing transactions. This proactive approach helps trustees avoid repetitive requests for additional documentation and fosters a smoother path to resolving title issues tied to trust administration.
In addition to Heggstad petitions, our office can prepare related estate planning documents that prevent future title issues, such as revocable living trusts, certifications of trust, pour-over wills, and powers of attorney. These complementary documents support coherent property planning and streamline administration. By addressing both immediate title needs and long-term estate planning, we help families create a durable framework that reduces the chance of similar complications for future generations, while providing clear documentation to satisfy title companies and courts.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents and the recorded title to identify the issue clearly. We then advise on necessary evidence, assist in drafting a trustee declaration, and prepare a certification of trust or excerpts from the trust instrument as appropriate. After preparing the petition and required notices, we file with the probate court and handle service to interested parties. Throughout the process we communicate with title companies and respond to any inquiries, aiming for a resolution that clarifies ownership while minimizing delay for trustees and beneficiaries.
In the first phase we conduct a detailed review of trust documents, deeds, and any supporting materials to determine the factual basis for a petition. This assessment identifies any gaps in documentary evidence and evaluates whether a Heggstad petition is likely to be the most efficient remedy. We also assess potential objections and outline what additional declarations or records may be necessary. Clear identification of assets and review of title histories at this stage reduces the chance of surprises later in the process.
We work with trustees to gather a complete set of relevant documents, including the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds, closing statements, and correspondence related to the asset. This collection is reviewed for consistency and to identify the best evidence demonstrating the trust maker’s intent. If a certification of trust is appropriate, we prepare that document to provide third parties with the necessary information while limiting disclosure of private trust provisions. Organized document packet preparation is critical to a coherent petition.
At the outset we identify potential interested parties and determine required notice and service procedures under local rules. Anticipating who may object allows us to draft arguments and gather additional proof preemptively. Where family members or creditors might raise concerns, we recommend steps to reduce disputes, such as early communication or targeted supplemental documentation. Proper assessment of how the court and third parties will view the petition increases the likelihood of a favorable, uncontested outcome and saves time for all involved.
Once documentation is collected, we draft the Heggstad petition and the supporting declarations tailored to the facts. The petition explains the legal basis for recognizing the asset as trust property, attaches necessary trust certifications or excerpts, and includes factual declarations showing intent. We ensure the filing complies with local court formatting and service rules, then file the petition and arrange service on interested parties. Attention to procedural detail at this stage reduces the potential for technical challenges that could delay resolution.
Carefully drafted declarations that tie documentary evidence to the trustee’s factual assertions are fundamental to convincing the court. We prepare exhibits that include certified copies, deeds, and related records, and annotate them where helpful to provide clear context for the court. These materials are organized to tell a coherent story showing the decedent’s intent and the trustee’s authority, which makes it easier for judges and title companies to accept the petition’s conclusions and issue an order recognizing trust ownership.
After filing the petition, proper service on all interested parties is essential, and we handle the logistics to ensure compliance with court rules. We also monitor responses and coordinate any communications with title companies or lenders who ask for clarifications. If objections or requests for additional proof arise, we prepare responses and supplemental materials promptly to keep the matter moving forward. Prompt attention to inquiries helps prevent unnecessary continuances and supports timely judicial resolution.
When the court is satisfied with the evidence, it issues an order recognizing the trust’s ownership of the specified asset. That order is then provided to title companies or recording offices to effect the needed changes in public records, support issuance of title insurance, or allow a sale or refinance. We assist with providing the order and any required follow-up documentation to complete the transaction and confirm that records reflect the trust’s ownership as intended by the decedent, bringing the matter to a practical and enforceable close.
If a hearing is scheduled, we prepare a concise presentation that highlights the most persuasive factual and legal points from the petition and supporting declarations. We organize evidence for easy judicial review and prepare the trustee to answer potential questions. Our goal in court is to obtain a clear order that title companies and third parties will accept, minimizing the need for further litigation and ensuring the trustee can move forward with administration consistent with the court’s directives.
Once the order is obtained, we assist with recording or providing the document to the county recorder and title companies so public records can be corrected or updated. We ensure the order meets the format and content requirements of recording offices and help trustees obtain any additional acknowledgements or title insurance requested by lenders. These final administrative steps complete the process and allow trustees to manage, sell, or refinance trust assets without the uncertainty caused by inconsistent recorded ownership.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used to obtain judicial recognition that a specific asset should be treated as trust property despite being recorded in the decedent’s name. It is appropriate when the trust instrument and supporting evidence demonstrate the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust but public records do not reflect that intention. The petition presents the factual and legal basis for recognizing trust ownership and requests an order that clarifies title for third parties such as title companies and lenders. Filing a petition is especially useful when the only problem is recorded title, and the trust itself is otherwise valid and in effect. The process can avoid a full probate administration when the matter is limited to title correction, but it requires careful documentary support and proper notice to interested parties to succeed in court and be accepted by third parties.
Key documents for a Heggstad petition typically include the trust instrument or a certification of trust, any amendments, deeds or other recorded documents related to the asset, closing statements, and any correspondence that shows the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. A trustee declaration that outlines the facts of the case and ties the documentary evidence to the legal grounds for the petition is also essential. Together, these materials form the factual record the court reviews when deciding whether to recognize the trust’s ownership. Additional documents may be required based on the asset type and local court rules, such as title reports or affidavits from witnesses. Early coordination with title companies and a careful review of the recorded title history reduce the chance that the court or third parties will ask for supplemental evidence, making the process more efficient and predictable.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, whether notice periods are required, and whether any parties file objections. In straightforward, uncontested matters where documentation is complete and all interested parties accept the filing, the process can move relatively quickly, potentially concluding in a matter of weeks to a few months after filing. This speed is one reason trustees choose the petition as an alternative to broader probate proceedings when title correction is the primary issue. If objections arise or the court requests additional evidence, the process may take longer and involve hearings or supplemental filings. Preparing a thorough petition with strong supporting documentation up front helps shorten the timeline and reduces the chance of procedural delays or extended litigation.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not necessarily open a full probate proceeding; it is a targeted remedy designed to resolve discrepancies between trust records and public title. When the trust is valid and the issue is limited to title recognition, the petition seeks a narrow court determination that the asset is trust property, avoiding a broader administration that would otherwise be required for probate assets. This preserves the privacy of trust terms better than full probate and limits court involvement to the specific title issue presented. However, if the petition reveals problems such as unclear trust formation, competing claims, or unresolved creditor matters, the court may require broader proceedings or additional steps. A thorough pre-filing review helps ensure the petition remains focused and reduces the likelihood of expanding into full probate administration.
Interested parties who must be notified typically include beneficiaries named in the trust, known heirs of the decedent, and any parties who have recorded interests in the property, such as lienholders or mortgagees. Local court rules govern the scope and manner of required notice, and failure to provide proper notice can result in delays or procedural challenges. Ensuring accurate and timely service is a vital part of the petition process to provide due process and reduce the chance of objections based on inadequate notice. When potential claimants or distant heirs are unknown, courts may require publication or additional searches to identify interested parties. Early identification of these parties and careful compliance with notice requirements helps the petition proceed without remand or dismissal for procedural defects.
Yes, title companies and lenders sometimes require a Heggstad order before issuing title insurance or completing a closing when public records conflict with trust documentation. The order provides a judicial determination that clarifies ownership and reduces the title company’s risk, allowing the transaction to proceed. Title companies vary in their thresholds for accepting certifications of trust versus requiring a court order, so it is common to coordinate with the title insurer early to determine what proof they will accept. Working with the title company before filing helps tailor the petition to meet their requirements and can prevent unexpected requests that delay closings. Providing an order from the court is often the definitive way to resolve title concerns and satisfy lenders and insurers.
If beneficiaries object to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider those objections and may require hearings or additional evidence to resolve the dispute. Objections might raise questions about the trust’s formation, the trustee’s authority, or the facts supporting the claim that the asset belongs to the trust. When objections occur, counsel may recommend negotiation, mediation, or supplemental filings to present a stronger factual record that addresses the objector’s concerns while seeking an order that protects trustee and beneficiary interests. Preparing for potential objections by assembling a thorough evidentiary record and clear declarations reduces the likelihood of contested hearings. If objections persist, the court will resolve the dispute based on the presented evidence, and a carefully prepared petition improves the chances of obtaining an order consistent with the trust’s terms and the decedent’s intent.
A single Heggstad petition can sometimes address multiple assets if they share a common factual and legal basis and the court’s procedures allow grouping them in one filing. Consolidating assets can be efficient when the trust instrument and supporting evidence demonstrate the same intent and ownership issues across several items. However, each asset should be clearly identified and supported by the necessary documents and declarations so the court can make specific findings for each one included in the petition. When assets have disparate histories or require different types of proof, separate petitions or tailored pleadings may be more appropriate. Evaluating the best approach depends on the nature of the assets, the title issues involved, and the preferences of the court and any third parties such as title insurers.
Costs to prepare and file a Heggstad petition vary based on complexity, the number of assets involved, and whether the proceeding is contested. Typical expenses include court filing fees, fees for preparing certified copies of trust documents, service costs for notifying interested parties, and professional fees for drafting the petition and declarations. When matters are straightforward and uncontested, costs are generally lower, but contested petitions or those requiring significant documentary tracing or hearings will increase overall expenses. Discussing fees and anticipated costs early helps trustees budget for the process. Many firms provide an initial assessment to estimate fees and recommend strategies to manage expenses, such as targeting the petition narrowly or addressing documentation gaps before filing to reduce the chance of additional proceedings.
You can reduce the likelihood of future title issues by properly funding trusts during the grantor’s lifetime, ensuring deeds and other records are updated to reflect trust ownership, and maintaining a clear, accessible set of trust documents including a certification of trust for third parties. Periodic reviews of estate planning documents and recorded assets help identify discrepancies early. When changes in ownership or residence occur, taking prompt steps to transfer title into the trust or update beneficiary designations prevents many common problems that later lead to petitions. Working with counsel to prepare comprehensive documents such as a revocable living trust, pour-over will, financial power of attorney, and health care directive ensures a coordinated plan. Clear recordkeeping and regular communication with successors and trustees helps avoid confusion and reduces the potential need for court filings after a decedent’s death.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas