If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Walnut Village, a trust modification petition may be the right path to align the trust with new circumstances. This process allows interested parties to ask a court to approve specific changes when direct amendment through the trust’s terms is impractical or impossible. Our page explains why this legal step is used, who may file, and the kinds of adjustments commonly requested, such as clarifying intent, correcting drafting errors, or addressing changes in family circumstances. We provide clear information to help you decide whether a petition is appropriate for your situation.
Navigating a trust modification petition requires careful review of the trust document, the relationships of beneficiaries and trustees, and applicable state law. In many cases, mistakes or unanticipated events make the original trust provisions difficult to carry out or unfair to intended beneficiaries. This guide helps Walnut Village residents understand what to expect from the petition process, how courts consider requests to modify trusts, and the potential outcomes. Our goal is to give practical, plain-language information so you can move forward with confidence and clarity when addressing trust changes.
A trust modification petition can prevent prolonged uncertainty and conflict by giving a formal route to correct or update trust provisions when simpler methods are unavailable. Courts may allow changes that honor the settlor’s likely intent while resolving ambiguities, fixing administrative issues, or accommodating life changes such as remarriage, a beneficiary’s disability, or changes in asset structure. Pursuing a petition promotes clarity and can mitigate disputes among interested parties. For Walnut Village clients, the petition process often preserves family harmony and protects the long-term administration of trust assets.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on thoughtful estate planning and trust administration. Our attorneys work to understand each client’s goals and the specific trust documents involved, then recommend practical steps to resolve issues through negotiation or petition when needed. We draw on experience with revocable and irrevocable trusts, trust amendment mechanisms, and court procedures to guide clients through the process while protecting their interests. Every matter receives personalized attention to pursue the best possible outcome for the family and fiduciaries involved.
A trust modification petition is a court filing asking a judge to approve changes to an existing trust when the trust itself cannot be directly altered under its terms. Typical petitioners include trustees seeking clarification to fulfill duties, beneficiaries seeking equitable adjustments, or conservators acting on behalf of an incapacitated settlor. The court examines the trust’s language, the settlor’s intent, and the circumstances prompting the request. Outcomes can range from an order permitting limited corrections to a broader modification that better aligns the trust with current realities while preserving the settlor’s core goals.
The petition process involves gathering documentation, articulating the legal basis for the requested change, and demonstrating that the modification serves the trust’s purpose or corrects an error. In many cases, parties attempt negotiation or mediation before seeking court approval to minimize cost and conflict. If agreements cannot be reached, a judge will weigh evidence and may authorize the requested change if it is consistent with the settlor’s intent or necessary for proper trust administration. Clients should expect to present clear factual and legal support for the petition.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in a probate or superior court to alter the terms, interpretation, or administration of a trust. The petition sets out the proposed changes and explains why those changes are needed, such as correcting drafting errors, addressing unforeseen events, or resolving ambiguities that hinder administration. The court evaluates whether the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and serves the trust’s purpose. If approved, the court issues an order that becomes part of the trust record and guides trustees in carrying out their duties under the revised terms.
Successful petitions rely on careful fact-gathering, a clear articulation of the legal basis for the change, and persuasive documentation of the settlor’s intent or the administrative need. Common elements include the original trust instrument, evidence of the settlor’s intent when available, declarations from trustees or beneficiaries, and a proposed revised trust provision or court order. The process often begins with a thorough review and negotiation, followed by filing, service of notice to interested parties, and either a stipulated order if parties agree or a contested hearing if they do not.
Understanding the vocabulary used in petitions helps you follow the process and participate effectively. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, conservator, and cy pres describe different roles and doctrines that may arise. Familiarity with common procedural terms like petition, order, notice, and hearing is also important. This glossary outlines the concepts you are likely to encounter, so you can discuss options with confidence and understand how courts approach requests to alter trust arrangements to achieve fairness and proper administration.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The settlor’s intent, as expressed in the trust document and related communications, is the primary guide for determining whether a court should permit modifications. When the settlor’s intent is unclear, the court may consider external evidence to interpret provisions. Understanding who the settlor is and what they intended guides trustees and beneficiaries when evaluating proposed changes and supports a reasoned request to the court for correction or modification.
The trustee is the person or institution responsible for managing the trust assets in accordance with the trust document and any court orders. Trustees have fiduciary duties to administer the trust prudently, act in beneficiaries’ best interests, and follow the settlor’s instructions. When trustees face ambiguities or practical problems, they may petition the court for instructions or modifications. Trustees often play a central role in identifying needed changes and presenting factual and legal support for a petition to ensure proper administration.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity designated to receive benefits from a trust. Beneficiaries can sometimes bring or oppose petitions to modify a trust, depending on their interests and the nature of the requested change. Courts consider beneficiaries’ rights alongside the settlor’s intent when evaluating modification petitions. Open communication among beneficiaries, trustees, and the court can reduce conflict and help identify solutions that reflect the settlor’s goals while addressing present-day needs or unanticipated circumstances.
Cy pres and related doctrines allow courts to revise charitable or purpose-oriented trusts when the original objective becomes impossible or impracticable. Under these principles, a judge can approve modifications that closely align with the settlor’s general intent while adapting the trust to current realities. For family trusts and other private trusts, courts use comparable reasoning to preserve the core purposes of the trust when circumstances change. Petitioners must show why strict adherence to original terms would frustrate the settlor’s intent or administration.
When trust issues arise, interested parties can often pursue informal negotiation, mediation, or a formal court petition. Negotiation and mediation are typically less costly and less adversarial, and they can preserve relationships by allowing parties to reach a mutually agreeable solution. However, when parties cannot agree or the trust’s terms prevent straightforward amendment, a petition provides a clear legal path to obtain a binding court order. Each option has trade-offs in time, cost, confidentiality, and predictability, and the best approach depends on the case specifics and the parties’ willingness to cooperate.
If the issue involves a clear typographical error, ambiguity in wording, or a simple administrative problem, parties may address the matter with a limited amendment or an agreed clarification without involving the court. Trustees and beneficiaries can sometimes document an agreed interpretation and proceed with administration accordingly. This approach reduces expense and preserves privacy. However, it depends on cooperation among interested parties and may not be appropriate if the trust explicitly restricts amendment or if other stakeholders object to the proposed resolution.
When all interested parties can reach a written agreement to revise the trust, they may be able to implement changes by executing permissible amendment documents or by filing a stipulated petition for court approval if required. An agreed solution can address distribution timing, trustee powers, or administrative provisions without protracted litigation. It is important to document the agreement clearly, ensure compliance with the trust’s amendment provisions, and consider whether court confirmation is advisable to preempt future disputes about the validity of the change.
A court petition becomes necessary when parties cannot agree on needed trust changes or when the settlor is incapacitated and cannot validly amend the document. Disputes over interpretation, beneficiary interests, or trustee actions may require judicial intervention to resolve competing claims and produce a binding order. In such cases, the court carefully examines the trust language and surrounding evidence to determine whether a modification is justified and to craft a remedy that serves the trust’s purpose while respecting the settlor’s likely intentions.
When requested changes affect fundamental distribution schemes, impose new conditions, or require altering a trust that is irrevocable under its terms, judicial approval may be the only viable option. Courts consider whether proposed changes are necessary for effective administration or to correct mistakes that frustrate the original plan. Petitioning allows the court to balance competing interests, provide clear instructions to trustees, and issue an enforceable order that protects all parties and the trust’s ongoing function.
Taking a comprehensive approach to trust modification often reduces ambiguity, limits future disputes, and ensures the trust operates as intended. By thoroughly evaluating the trust document, financial implications, and family dynamics, parties can craft solutions that preserve assets and honor the settlor’s goals. Comprehensive work tends to produce durable results that trustees can implement without repeated court involvement. This broader perspective can prevent piecemeal changes that later create new conflicts or administrative burdens for successors and beneficiaries.
A thoughtful process typically incorporates clear documentation, court-approved orders when appropriate, and coordinated revisions to related estate planning documents. That coordination protects retirement accounts, beneficiary designations, and tax considerations that might otherwise be overlooked. By addressing the trust holistically, parties reduce the risk of unintended consequences and ensure that updates align with broader estate planning goals. For Walnut Village families, this approach supports smoother trust administration and greater predictability for future generations.
A comprehensive resolution provides trustees with clear legal authority and beneficiaries with a reliable understanding of their rights, reducing the potential for disputes and administration delays. When courts issue orders or parties document agreed changes, trustees can act confidently in managing assets and making distributions. Clear guidance reduces the need for repeated legal interventions and protects fiduciaries from liability for reasonable actions taken in good faith under clarified terms. This certainty benefits all parties by streamlining trust administration and reducing long-term costs.
By focusing on the settlor’s overarching goals when proposing modifications, the process helps ensure that changes support the original purpose of the trust rather than altering it in unforeseen ways. Courts and parties aim to honor the settlor’s probable intent while adapting to changed circumstances. This alignment preserves the integrity of the estate plan and protects beneficiaries’ expectations. Well-documented changes reduce the risk that future parties will challenge administration decisions, keeping the trust consistent with the settlor’s wishes across generations.
Begin by locating and reviewing the original trust instrument and any related documents such as amendments, pour-over wills, or declarations. Understanding the trust’s language and the settlor’s stated objectives makes it easier to determine whether a petition is needed and what relief to request. Gather records of trustee actions, beneficiary communications, and any evidence of the settlor’s intent, such as letters or prior legal drafts. A thorough document review helps identify whether a negotiated amendment, a stipulated court filing, or a contested petition best addresses the problem.
Before petitioning to modify a trust, assess how changes will affect related estate planning documents such as beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives. Revisions to a trust may interact with retirement accounts, life insurance trusts, and provisions for guardianship nominations. A comprehensive review ensures that a modification does not create unintended tax consequences or conflicts among documents. Planning across the estate strategy preserves the settlor’s overall intentions and minimizes surprises for trustees and beneficiaries in the long term.
Residents often consider a petition when the trust’s terms prove impractical or when the settlor could not foresee life events that affect beneficiaries or asset management. Common motivations include correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous instructions that hinder administration, adjusting distributions following a beneficiary’s disability or changed needs, and resolving disputes that threaten the trust’s purpose. When the settlor is incapacitated and formal amendment is impossible, a petition allows the court to authorize changes that preserve the settlor’s intent and promote fair administration.
Other reasons include adapting to changes in asset structure, such as retirement accounts or business interests, that the original trust did not anticipate. Petitioning may also address situations where a trustee needs explicit judicial instruction to perform complex duties or when competing beneficiary claims require a neutral resolution. Pursuing a petition can protect the trust from later challenges by providing a court-validated order, which reduces uncertainty and helps trustees carry out distributions with legal authority and reduced exposure to dispute.
Several circumstances commonly lead families to seek trust modification through the courts, including ambiguous language that creates conflicting interpretations, a settlor’s incapacity preventing formal amendments, substantial changes in beneficiary needs, and administrative inefficiencies that impede asset management. Other triggers include errors in the drafting process, omitted assets that were not transferred properly into the trust, and changes in laws that affect tax treatment or fiduciary powers. Each scenario calls for careful analysis to determine the appropriate remedy and whether court approval is recommended.
Ambiguities in a trust document can leave trustees uncertain about how to proceed and can prompt disputes among beneficiaries. When language is unclear about distributions, successor trustee powers, or contingencies, a petition can seek a judicial interpretation or correction to clarify the intent. Courts consider the trust instrument, surrounding circumstances, and available evidence of the settlor’s wishes when resolving ambiguous terms. Clarifying the language through a court determination promotes smoother administration and reduces the chance of ongoing litigation among interested parties.
If the settlor becomes incapacitated or passes away without executing necessary amendments, beneficiaries or trustees may need to petition for changes that reflect current realities while honoring the settlor’s wishes. Incapacity prevents the settlor from signing a valid amendment, and death may leave assets or contingencies that the original document did not address. A court petition can authorize changes that allow the trust to function effectively under changed circumstances, balancing respect for the settlor’s design with practical administration needs.
Administrative obstacles, such as assets that were never properly transferred into the trust or unclear trustee powers that hamper management, can threaten efficient trust administration. In some cases, a petition is necessary to resolve title issues, incorporate omitted assets through a pour-over will, or confirm trustee authority to take specific actions. Addressing these problems through the proper legal channels helps ensure that assets intended for the trust are protected and that trustees have the authority they need to manage and distribute property according to the settlor’s plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides guidance and representation for trust modification matters in Walnut Village and surrounding Orange County communities. We assist clients in evaluating trust language, collecting necessary documentation, and pursuing negotiated resolutions or court petitions when required. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful preparation, and practical solutions that reflect the settlor’s objectives and beneficiaries’ needs. Clients receive focused attention to the legal and personal considerations that accompany trust modifications so they can move forward with confidence.
Clients turn to our firm when they need clear guidance on whether to pursue negotiation, mediation, or a court petition to modify a trust. We evaluate the trust document, identify likely legal arguments, and outline the risks and benefits of each approach. Our team prepares thorough petition filings and supporting declarations when court action is necessary, and we work to minimize conflict whenever possible. Throughout the process, we prioritize communication with trustees and beneficiaries so that clients understand the path forward and what to expect at each stage.
We also assist with coordinating revisions to related estate planning documents to ensure consistency across a settlor’s overall plan. By reviewing powers of attorney, healthcare directives, beneficiary designations, and pour-over wills, we help prevent unintended consequences that can arise from isolated changes. This comprehensive review helps preserve the settlor’s goals and provides trustees with clear, enforceable authority to administer the trust as intended under updated provisions or court orders.
Our firm aims to balance efficient resolution with careful attention to procedural requirements and the rights of all interested parties. When negotiation is possible, we work to reach agreements that avoid unnecessary expense. When court involvement becomes necessary, we prepare rigorous filings and advocate for orders that provide durable solutions. Clients appreciate practical counsel designed to protect assets, respect family dynamics, and deliver reliable outcomes for trustees and beneficiaries across generations.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and related documents to identify the nature of the issue and whether a negotiated resolution is feasible. If a petition is appropriate, we gather supporting evidence, prepare declarations, and draft a proposed order or revised provision. We provide notice to all interested parties and pursue amicable solutions where possible. If disputes remain, we present the matter to the court and advocate for a resolution that reflects the settlor’s intent and supports efficient trust administration while reducing the likelihood of future contestation.
In the first phase, we collect the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents, and evidence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. This step includes reviewing trustee actions, beneficiary communications, and any existing disputes. The assessment clarifies whether the issue can be resolved through negotiation, a stipulated petition, or requires a contested hearing. A careful assessment prepares the foundation for any filing and helps identify the most practical, cost-effective path to a binding resolution that serves the trust’s purpose.
We assist in gathering all relevant materials, including trust instruments, deeds, beneficiary designations, correspondence, and any notes reflecting the settlor’s intent. Often, external evidence like letters or prior drafts helps clarify ambiguous provisions. Collecting comprehensive documentation early improves the clarity and persuasiveness of any petition and can make it easier to negotiate an agreed solution. This preparation also helps identify parties who must be notified and any procedural steps required under California law for filing the petition.
After compiling evidence, we evaluate the legal grounds for a petition, the likelihood of agreement among parties, and potential objections. This evaluation informs the strategy, whether that involves mediation, a stipulated filing, or a contested hearing. We weigh procedural requirements, timeline considerations, and the impact on related estate planning instruments. Advising clients on these factors ensures informed decisions about next steps and helps tailor a petition that addresses both legal and practical concerns.
Once strategy is set, we prepare and file the petition and serve notice on all required parties. We aim to facilitate productive discussion and negotiation among interested parties to resolve disputes without a hearing when possible. If parties reach agreement, we prepare a stipulated order for court approval. If disagreements persist, we prepare for a hearing with declarations and evidence organized to support the requested modification. Throughout this step, we maintain transparent communication to keep clients informed about timelines and potential outcomes.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties is essential to the petition process. We handle service requirements, respond to inquiries, and coordinate discussions to explore resolution options. Engaging parties early can identify areas of agreement and narrow contested issues, which often reduces time and cost. If parties agree, we memorialize the terms in a stipulated petition or order. If not, we ensure the court record contains clear, organized evidence supporting the requested relief and addressing likely objections.
We prepare the case for mediation or a court hearing by organizing evidence, drafting declarations, and outlining legal arguments that demonstrate why the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and administrative needs. Even when pursuing formal proceedings, we remain open to settlement opportunities that resolve disputes efficiently. Thorough preparation reduces surprises at hearing and increases the chances of a favorable outcome. Clients receive realistic guidance about timing, costs, and the likelihood of achieving desired modifications.
After the court issues an order, we assist in implementing the changes and updating trust records, asset transfers, and related documents. We coordinate with trustees, financial institutions, and other professionals to ensure that the court’s directive is executed smoothly. Follow-up work includes amending beneficiary records where appropriate, recording any required documents, and advising trustees on ongoing fiduciary duties under the modified terms. This final phase helps ensure that the intended changes are effective and enforceable.
Once a court approves a modification, we prepare the necessary documentation to reflect the order in trust records and communicate with financial institutions and title holders to effect changes. Implementation may involve re-titling assets, updating account beneficiaries, or preparing revised trust schedules. Clear documentation and communication reduce administrative errors and help trustees manage assets in accordance with the new terms. We also advise on follow-up steps to ensure compliance and minimize the chance of future disputes about the order’s meaning or scope.
After changes are implemented, we remain available to advise trustees and beneficiaries on applying the modified terms and addressing any follow-up issues. This includes coordinating updates to related estate planning instruments and helping trustees understand new distribution rules or powers. Ongoing guidance helps prevent inadvertent conflicts and ensures the estate plan continues to reflect the settlor’s goals. Our follow-up work emphasizes clarity and compliance so that the trust functions efficiently for current and future generations.
A trust modification petition is a court filing requesting a change to a trust’s terms or a judicial interpretation of ambiguous provisions. Parties who commonly file include trustees seeking clear authority to administer the trust, beneficiaries requesting adjustments to distributions, and conservators acting for an incapacitated settlor. The petition explains the specific change sought and the legal and factual reasons supporting it. Courts evaluate whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent and the trust’s purpose before granting relief. Petitions may be contested or agreed among all interested parties. When parties reach an agreement, they can prepare a stipulated petition and seek judicial approval, which can streamline the process and reduce costs. If a dispute remains, the court conducts a hearing on the evidence presented and issues an order that resolves the contested issue. Clear documentation and early communication with interested parties improve the prospects of obtaining a favorable ruling or settlement.
Timing for a trust modification petition varies based on case complexity, whether parties agree, and the court’s schedule. If parties reach a stipulated agreement, the process can conclude in a matter of weeks or a few months, depending on how quickly documents are prepared and the court calendars. Contested petitions typically take longer because they involve discovery, declaratory evidence, and hearings, which extend the timeline and require additional preparation. In Orange County, the court’s calendar and procedural requirements influence how quickly a matter moves. Preparing a complete petition with organized evidence, notifying all interested parties promptly, and pursuing negotiation where possible can reduce delays. Anticipating probable objections and preparing thorough declarations also helps move a contested matter more efficiently through the judicial process.
In some situations, trustees can act under the trust’s existing provisions to resolve minor administrative problems without court involvement, especially when beneficiaries agree and the trust allows for amendment or trustee discretion. However, when the trust’s terms prevent a needed change, when beneficiaries disagree, or when the settlor is incapacitated, court approval may be necessary to create a binding solution. Trustees must exercise care to avoid actions that could expose them to challenge or liability. When uncertainty or opposition exists, seeking court guidance through a petition provides legal protection and an authoritative resolution. A court order clarifies trustee powers and beneficiary rights, which reduces the risk of future disputes. Trustees should document their reasoning, consult with legal counsel, and consider negotiation before taking steps that alter the trust’s administration in contested circumstances.
Courts consider the trust document’s plain language first, then look to extrinsic evidence when the language is ambiguous or incomplete. Evidence may include prior drafts, correspondence, statements of the settlor, or testimony that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Courts also weigh the practical implications of a requested modification for proper administration and whether the change preserves the trust’s fundamental purpose while addressing present-day needs. Judges balance competing interests, including beneficiary rights and trustee duties, as they assess whether a modification is appropriate. Courts are cautious about altering a settlor’s expressed wishes without compelling reasons; petitioners should present clear factual support and a well-reasoned legal basis for relief. Demonstrating that a change will avoid frustration of the settlor’s intent or eliminate an administrative impediment strengthens a petition.
A trust modification can interact with other estate planning documents, and changes should be considered in the context of the settlor’s broader plan. For example, modifications may affect beneficiary distributions that are tied to retirement accounts, life insurance, or pour-over wills. It is important to review and, if necessary, update related documents so that all elements of the estate plan remain aligned and enforceable after any modification is implemented. Coordinating revisions reduces the risk of conflicting instructions and unintended tax or distribution consequences. When court approval is obtained, updating beneficiary designations, trust schedules, and related instruments ensures that financial institutions and fiduciaries implement the modified terms correctly. Thoughtful coordination helps maintain a consistent estate plan that reflects the settlor’s intent across all relevant documents.
Costs for a petition vary widely depending on complexity, whether parties agree, and the need for contested hearings or expert testimony. If parties reach an agreement and prepare a stipulated petition, fees are generally lower because the matter can be resolved without protracted litigation. Contested matters involve additional attorney time, possible discovery, and hearing preparation, which increase costs. Filing fees and court costs also apply and vary by jurisdiction. Planning and early negotiation help manage expenses. Clear documentation and focused legal strategy can limit unnecessary work, and communicating with other interested parties may produce a cost-effective settlement. Clients should discuss fee expectations upfront and consider the potential long-term benefits of a binding court order versus the upfront cost of litigation when weighing options.
If beneficiaries object to a requested change, the court will consider those objections as part of the decision-making process. Objecting parties may file responses, present declarations, and provide evidence that supports the trust’s original terms or offers an alternative interpretation. The court balances objections against the petitioner’s proof that the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or is necessary for administration, and it may hold a hearing to resolve disputed issues. Often, parties attempt mediation or negotiation to narrow contested points before a hearing. Settlement can preserve relationships and reduce costs. When objections persist, thorough preparation and clear documentary evidence help the court reach a fair resolution. Ultimately, a court order resolves competing claims and provides a binding outcome that trustees can implement.
Modifications made for tax planning or creditor protection must be carefully evaluated because courts scrutinize changes that appear designed to evade obligations or create unfair results. Some changes may be permissible when they reflect the settlor’s legitimate intent or address unforeseen circumstances, but courts will reject petitions that undermine creditors’ rights or contravene public policy. Tax consequences should be reviewed with financial advisors to ensure that proposed changes do not trigger adverse results. When protections are appropriate and lawful, a petition can clarify trust powers or adjust provisions to improve administration in light of financial realities. Any change aimed at tax or creditor issues should be supported by legal and factual analysis and coordinated with tax professionals when necessary. Transparent documentation demonstrating legitimate purposes increases the likelihood of court approval while reducing legal risk.
Alternatives to a contested hearing include negotiation, mediation, or preparing a stipulated petition for court approval if all interested parties agree. These approaches reduce time and expense and foster cooperative solutions that can be tailored to family needs. Mediation allows a neutral facilitator to help parties reach a mutually acceptable resolution. When successful, agreed changes can be presented to the court for confirmation, often with less adversarial impact than litigation. Even when a contested hearing becomes necessary, attempting alternative dispute resolution first often narrows issues and clarifies the points of disagreement, making court proceedings more focused. Counsel can help structure mediation or settlement discussions so that any agreement is clear, enforceable, and consistent with legal requirements, which preserves the trust’s purposes and reduces the likelihood of future disputes.
Prepare your case by assembling the trust document, any amendments or related estate planning papers, and evidence that helps explain the settlor’s intent, such as correspondence, prior drafts, or witness statements. Gathering financial records and documents showing trustee actions or administrative impediments also supports the petition. Thorough preparation helps clarify the legal issues and makes negotiations or court presentations more effective. Consultation with legal counsel early in the process helps identify potential objections and procedural requirements, such as who must be served with notice and which filings the court expects. Counsel can advise on evidence to gather, whether alternative dispute resolution is feasible, and the likely timeline. Being well-prepared increases the prospects of a favorable outcome, whether through agreement or a court order.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas