A Heggstad petition is a legal remedy in California used when property that should have been held in a trust remains titled in the name of the deceased. This situation often arises during estate administration when assets were intended to fund a revocable living trust but were never properly transferred. The petition asks the court to recognize those assets as trust property and transfer title to the trustee. For residents of Granite Bay and surrounding Placer County communities, understanding how a Heggstad petition works can help avoid prolonged probate and preserve the intentions of the trust maker while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist trustees, family members, and fiduciaries in navigating the procedural and evidentiary requirements for a successful Heggstad petition. The process typically involves assembling documentary evidence showing the decedent’s intent that the asset be part of the trust, such as the trust document, correspondence, prior transfer attempts, and contemporaneous estate planning records. Courts evaluate both the intent and whether the transfer aligns with the terms of the trust. Timely and thorough preparation of a petition increases the likelihood that title will be quieted in the trust and probate avoided.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be an effective way to honor a decedent’s estate plan while minimizing time, cost, and public exposure that comes with probate. When successful, the petition results in the court declaring the asset to be trust property and directing the county recorder to transfer title to the trustee or issue a new deed in the trustee’s name. This process can preserve privacy, accelerate distribution to beneficiaries under the trust, and reduce administrative burdens. For many families in Granite Bay, resolving lingering title issues through a Heggstad petition restores clear ownership and helps preserve the continuity of asset management under the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide estate planning and trust administration services to clients throughout California, including Placer County and Granite Bay. With a focus on practical solutions for trust-related issues, our team assists trustees and family members in gathering necessary documentation, preparing petitions, and representing clients in hearings when needed. We emphasize clear communication about process, likely timelines, and evidence required to support a court determination that property should be treated as trust property. Our goal is to help fiduciaries achieve outcomes that reflect the decedent’s intentions and minimize administrative delay.
A Heggstad petition addresses situations where property intended to be in a trust was not retitled before the decedent’s death. California courts require proof that the decedent had the intent to place the asset in the trust and that the failure to transfer was accidental or administrative. Evidence commonly used includes the trust agreement, deeds, transfer documents, beneficiary designations, bank records, and correspondence showing intent. Trustees must present a clear narrative and supporting documentation so the court can find that title should be quieted in favor of the trust, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms.
The petition typically asks the probate court to declare that the asset was trust property and to order appropriate corrective action, such as recording a deed in the trustee’s name or directing a county recorder to accept a trust-related instrument. While Heggstad petitions can often be resolved without prolonged litigation, they require careful attention to evidentiary detail and procedural rules. Trustees should be prepared to explain prior transfer attempts, the relationship between the asset and the trust, and to supply any contemporaneous documents that show the decedent’s intention to fund the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a request to the probate court that assets titled in the decedent’s name be treated as trust assets because the decedent intended them to be part of the trust. The court evaluates the decedent’s intention and decides whether to recognize the trustee’s authority to control or transfer the asset. This legal remedy derives from case law and is commonly used where deeds, account registrations, or other formalities were overlooked. The petition helps bridge technical title defects and the decedent’s estate plan so that trust administration proceeds according to the trust terms rather than through probate distribution.
Successful Heggstad petitions rely on several core elements: a valid trust document that names a trustee and beneficiaries, demonstrable intent to include the asset in the trust, and evidence showing that the asset remained in the decedent’s name due to oversight rather than intent to exclude it. Supporting materials may include prior deeds, trust schedules, communications about the trust, and declarations from individuals with knowledge of the decedent’s intent. The process usually involves drafting the petition, filing it in the appropriate probate court, serving interested parties, and, if necessary, presenting evidence at a hearing for the court to make its determination.
Understanding terms such as trustee, trust property, title, quiet title, and petition is important when pursuing a Heggstad petition. These terms describe the roles and mechanisms used to correct asset ownership to match the trust. A trustee is the individual or entity authorized to manage trust assets. Quiet title refers to a court declaration resolving competing ownership claims. Documentation showing intent is often decisive. Familiarity with these terms helps trustees and family members follow the procedural steps and gather the necessary records to support a petition and achieve a prompt resolution.
A trustee is the person or institution empowered by a trust document to hold, manage, and distribute trust assets on behalf of beneficiaries. Trustees act under the terms of the trust and may have authority to transfer title, sell property, or make distributions as directed. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trustee is typically the petitioner asking the court to recognize certain assets as trust property. Trustees owe fiduciary duties such as loyalty and prudence in administering the trust, and must follow proper procedures when presenting evidence and seeking court approval for actions that affect trust assets.
A quiet title determination is a court ruling that settles disputes over ownership and clears defects in the chain of title. In Heggstad petition matters, the relief sought often includes a quiet title declaration that an asset is trust property, permitting the trustee to record a new deed or take other steps to reflect proper ownership. Quiet title remedies remove clouds on title and help prevent future disputes. The court examines documentation and testimony to ensure the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust before granting such relief to the trustee or beneficiaries.
Trust property refers to assets placed into a trust and managed by the trustee for the benefit of the named beneficiaries. Examples include real estate, bank accounts, and personal property. When an asset remains titled in the decedent’s individual name despite being intended for the trust, a Heggstad petition seeks to have that asset recognized as trust property. Demonstrating that the asset was meant to fund the trust is central to the petition, often requiring documentary evidence and a demonstration that any failure to transfer title was accidental or administrative rather than the decedent’s express intent to exclude the asset from the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing in probate court asking the judge to declare that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust and to order corrective measures so those assets are treated as trust property. The name comes from case law that recognized this remedy. Petitioners typically provide the trust agreement and corroborating evidence to show the decedent’s intention. If granted, the court’s order allows the trustee to transfer or record title under the trust and to manage the asset in accordance with the trust terms, thereby reducing the need for full probate administration.
When an asset remains in a decedent’s name, there are multiple legal paths to resolve ownership: formal probate, summary procedures, small estate affidavits, or a Heggstad petition to treat the asset as trust property. Formal probate can be time-consuming and public, while summary options have eligibility limits. A Heggstad petition targets the core issue of intended trust ownership and, if supported by evidence, can result in a court declaration that moves the asset into the trust without full probate. Choosing the right option depends on asset value, the strength of documentation showing intent, and whether interested parties will contest the petition.
A limited approach to resolving title may be appropriate when the asset’s value is relatively low and ownership facts are straightforward. For example, small bank accounts or low-value personal property with clear evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund a trust can sometimes be resolved through simplified procedures or an informal correction. If heirs agree and documentary proof is clear, the parties may record corrective instruments without extensive court involvement. However, even in simple cases, having a clear written record of intent and appropriate trust documentation helps ensure a smooth outcome and prevents disputes later.
When all beneficiaries and interested parties agree that the asset should be treated as part of the trust, resolution can be faster and less costly. Agreement among parties can allow trustees to gather the necessary documents and present a joint statement or stipulation to the county recorder, or to proceed with a cooperative filing that avoids contested hearings. Even with unanimous agreement, some formalities may still be required for real estate transfers, so careful documentation and proper recording are necessary to ensure the transfer is legally effective and that future title challenges are minimized.
If there are conflicting claims to an asset, ambiguous documents, or disagreements among heirs, a formal petition to the probate court is often the best route to achieve a definitive resolution. In such circumstances, a Heggstad petition provides a procedural framework for presenting evidence, examining witnesses, and obtaining a court order that clarifies ownership. The court’s involvement reduces the risk of future litigation because its judgment resolves uncertainties about whether the asset was meant to be part of the trust, and the resulting order can be recorded to protect the trustee’s rights in perpetuity.
Certain title defects cannot be corrected through administrative filings alone and require a judicial declaration to convince a county recorder or third parties to accept a change in ownership. Real estate often falls into this category, especially when deeds are unclear or prior conveyances are incomplete. A Heggstad petition produces a court order that directly addresses these defects and provides the legal authority to record new documents in the trustee’s name. Judicial intervention also offers legal certainty for banks, title companies, and subsequent buyers who rely on clear chain-of-title documentation.
Pursuing a formal Heggstad petition offers several benefits, including a clear court order that resolves title uncertainties, the ability to record corrected instruments, and reduced likelihood of future disputes. This process protects beneficiaries by aligning legal title with the decedent’s documented intent. It also can streamline trust administration because assets recognized by the court can be managed or distributed under trust terms without the delays of probate. For trustees, a court order provides confidence to act on behalf of the trust and simplifies interactions with financial institutions and title companies.
Additionally, a comprehensive approach anticipates potential challenges and addresses them proactively. By compiling robust evidence and following formal procedures, trustees reduce the risk of contested litigation and create a public record that supports future transactions. The court’s oversight ensures that all interested parties are notified and have the opportunity to raise concerns, which can help prevent unexpected claims later. In many cases, obtaining a judicial declaration is the most reliable way to secure long-term clarity and to protect family assets in compliance with California law.
One of the primary benefits of a successful Heggstad petition is obtaining a court declaration that resolves defects in title and enables recordable relief. This means a trustee can record a new deed, obtain clear ownership documentation, and proceed with management or sale under trust terms. Recordable relief reduces the risk that subsequent purchasers or lenders will encounter title issues. For families in Granite Bay, securing recordable documentation ensures that the decedent’s intended estate plan is honored and that assets can be handled efficiently in the years ahead without lingering questions about rightful ownership.
A judicial determination through a Heggstad petition protects both trustees and beneficiaries by creating a formal record that supports trustee actions and beneficiary rights. Once the court recognizes assets as trust property, trustees can distribute or manage those assets under the trust terms with greater certainty and less fear of later challenges. Beneficiaries gain assurance that distributions align with the decedent’s intentions. This protection is especially valuable when dealing with real estate, financial institutions, or third parties who require a court order to accept changes in ownership.
Begin by collecting the trust document, any deeds or deeds of trust, account statements, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that indicate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Having a complete record makes it easier to demonstrate that an asset was meant to be trust property. Also look for earlier transfer attempts or notes that reference funding the trust. A well-documented file reduces delays and clarifies the chain of events for the court. Organization and completeness are key to presenting a persuasive petition and avoiding unnecessary follow-up requests for evidence.
Be ready to explain the factual circumstances surrounding the failure to transfer title, including any administrative or paperwork oversights. Courts examine the decedent’s intent and whether the omission was inadvertent. Prepare declarations from individuals who can attest to intent and collect contemporaneous documents that support the claim. Anticipating common judicial questions and addressing them in the initial filing improves efficiency and demonstrates that the trustee has conducted a careful review. Proper preparation often leads to quicker court decisions and reduces the likelihood of contested hearings.
If an asset that should be in a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, pursuing a Heggstad petition can align legal title with the decedent’s intentions and avoid the expense and delay of probate. The petition can be particularly helpful for real estate, retirement accounts, or bank accounts where title inconsistencies could prevent distribution under trust terms. By obtaining a court declaration, trustees enable the trust to govern management and distribution, preserving privacy and speeding up administration. The process safeguards beneficiaries and provides a clear path forward when documentation supports the trust funding intent.
A Heggstad petition also offers protection when third parties like title companies or financial institutions require judicial confirmation before accepting a change in ownership. The court’s order provides formal recognition of trust ownership and reduces the risk of future disputes over title. For families in Granite Bay and across Placer County, this option is a practical tool to address oversight in estate transfers and to ensure that the decedent’s estate plan is followed. Trustees who act promptly and gather compelling evidence improve the probability of a favorable outcome.
Heggstad petitions often arise when deeds were never transferred into a trust, bank accounts were not retitled, jointly titled property has ambiguous intent, or when a trust funding schedule omitted a recently acquired asset. Other situations include transfers intended to occur by pour-over will, failed recording of a deed, or mismatches between trust schedules and actual asset titles. These circumstances leave assets technically outside the trust despite the decedent’s expressed plan. A Heggstad petition helps reconcile these discrepancies and brings titled assets under the trust’s management.
Real estate often triggers a Heggstad petition because deeds are the primary mechanism for transferring ownership and are subject to strict recording requirements. If a home or parcel was intended to be held by the trust but the deed remains in the decedent’s name, the trustee may seek a court order to quiet title in the trust. The petition should show the trust document, any attempted transfer documents, and evidence that the decedent intended the property to fund the trust. Courts will examine the totality of evidence to determine whether the asset should be recognized as trust property.
Bank and brokerage accounts can remain in the decedent’s individual name if retitling paperwork was overlooked. When these types of accounts are at issue, trustees compile account statements, correspondence with the financial institution, trust funding instructions, and other records showing intent. Some institutions accept affidavits or court orders, while others require a judicial declaration before allowing transfers. A Heggstad petition provides the court-supported authority needed to move accounts into the trust and to permit the trustee to manage or distribute funds consistent with trust terms.
When assets were acquired shortly before death or when a planned transfer was initiated but not completed, the paperwork may not reflect the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. In those scenarios, contemporaneous documents such as purchase agreements, funding instructions, or email correspondence can show the decedent’s plan. A Heggstad petition allows the trustee to present that evidence to the court and request an order recognizing those assets as trust property. This helps ensure the estate plan functions as intended even when administrative steps were incomplete.
For individuals and families in Granite Bay and nearby Placer County communities, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offer guidance on preparing and filing Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. We help trustees collect supporting documents, draft the petition, and navigate procedural requirements such as notices and filings. Our approach focuses on clear communication, practical timelines, and achieving lawful resolution so the trust can be administered according to the decedent’s wishes. Call our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and next steps for resolving title issues efficiently.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman bring focused legal support to trustees and families addressing trust funding issues and Heggstad petitions. We prioritize compiling persuasive documentation that demonstrates intent and meets courts’ evidentiary expectations. Our services include reviewing trust instruments, locating relevant records, preparing petitions and declarations, and coordinating required notices to interested parties. We strive to minimize delays and provide clear guidance throughout the process so trustees can proceed with confidence in administering trust assets in accordance with the trust’s terms.
We emphasize practical solutions tailored to each case, recognizing that every estate plan and family circumstance is different. Our team helps identify the most efficient route to correct title issues, whether through cooperative documentation, a negotiated approach with interested parties, or a formal petition when necessary. We also work with title companies and financial institutions to ensure recorded outcomes reflect the court’s order. By focusing on thorough preparation and transparent communication, we help clients achieve lasting clarity for trust administration.
Our office serves clients across California, including Granite Bay and Placer County, and is available to answer initial questions and explain procedural steps and likely timelines. We can assist with all elements of the filing process and represent trustees in court if a hearing becomes necessary. If you are unsure whether a Heggstad petition is the right path, contact us to review your documents and determine the best strategy to align title with the decedent’s estate plan while protecting the interests of trustees and beneficiaries.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents and any relevant asset records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is warranted. We then help gather supporting evidence, prepare the petition and declarations, and serve required notices to beneficiaries and interested parties. If a court hearing is necessary, we present the evidence and legal arguments on behalf of the trustee. Throughout this process we coordinate with title companies and financial institutions to implement the court’s order and ensure corrected records are properly recorded and reflected in public filings.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust document, title records, deeds, account statements, and any communications that show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We identify gaps, collect corroborating evidence, and determine the strongest factual showing to support the petition. This stage also involves identifying interested parties who must receive notice and preparing declarations from witnesses or fiduciaries. Careful preparation at this stage lays the groundwork for a well-supported petition and reduces the chance of delays or evidentiary objections at later stages.
Collecting complete documentation is essential. This includes the trust agreement, schedules, deeds, bank or brokerage statements, transaction records, and any notes or correspondence indicating funding intent. We also look for draft or executed transfer instruments and evidence of prior conversations with attorneys or financial institutions. These materials form the backbone of the petition and help establish a timeline and narrative the court can evaluate. Thorough documentation increases the petition’s persuasiveness and reduces the likelihood of contested factual disputes.
Proper notice is a procedural requirement for petitions that affect trust property and beneficiaries. We prepare and serve notices to heirs, beneficiaries, and any known creditors or claimants as required by California law. Timely and accurate notice helps preserve procedural compliance and gives interested parties an opportunity to object or provide supporting evidence. Handling notice correctly prevents avoidable delays or jurisdictional challenges and ensures the court can proceed to consider the petition’s merits without procedural obstacles.
Once documents and notice lists are prepared, the petition is filed in the appropriate probate court. Filing triggers statutory timelines for responses and hearings, and we ensure all required attachments and declarations accompany the petition. Service of process to interested parties follows established rules, and we track compliance so the court has confidence that all parties were properly informed. Accurate filing and service support a smoother court review and reduce procedural grounds for objections that could delay resolution.
Declarations from the trustee and witnesses are critical to explain the circumstances of the attempted transfer and the decedent’s intent. These statements should be factual, detailed, and accompanied by documentary exhibits where possible. We draft declarations that align with legal standards and anticipate likely questions from the court. Including comprehensive supporting exhibits with the petition strengthens the factual record and helps the court evaluate whether the asset should be treated as trust property without the need for extensive additional discovery.
Before and after filing, it is often necessary to communicate with title companies, banks, and other third parties to determine documentation they require to accept changes in ownership. We coordinate these communications and prepare the court order language and recordable instruments that title companies will accept. Early coordination avoids surprises at recording and helps ensure that, once a court order is obtained, it can be promptly implemented to update public records and facilitate management or sale of the asset by the trustee.
If a hearing is necessary, we present the petition, declarations, and documentary evidence to the court and respond to any objections raised by interested parties. Following the hearing, if the court finds in favor of the petition, it issues an order declaring the asset to be trust property and specifying the corrective action to record title or transfer ownership. We then take steps to record the court order, prepare any required deeds or instruments, and coordinate with the recorder’s office and financial institutions to implement the court’s directive and ensure the trust can administer the asset as intended.
At the hearing, the trustee’s declarations and documentary exhibits form the primary basis for the court’s decision. We prepare witnesses and organize evidence to clearly show the decedent’s intent and the chain of events. If objections arise, we address them with legal arguments and additional documentary support. The goal is to secure a clear, enforceable order that resolves title issues and enables the trustee to carry out trust duties without ambiguity. Thorough preparation helps streamline the hearing and increase the chance of a favorable resolution.
After obtaining an order, it is necessary to record any required deeds or submit the order to banks and title companies to effectuate the transfer. We prepare recordable documents that comply with county recorder requirements and assist with submission and follow-up until records are updated. Ensuring the court’s order is properly recorded completes the process and provides the trustee with the documentation needed to manage or distribute the asset under the trust, reducing the likelihood of future title disputes or administrative complications.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing asking the judge to declare that certain assets that remain titled in the decedent’s name were intended to be trust assets and should be treated as such. This remedy is used when funding of a revocable living trust was incomplete or when an asset was mistakenly left out of trust title. The petition requests a judicial declaration and, where appropriate, an order allowing the trustee to record corrective instruments so the asset is managed or distributed under the trust terms. You should consider a Heggstad petition when documentary evidence and witness statements strongly indicate the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust but formal transfer was not completed. This option is often preferable to full probate when the facts are clear, the value of the asset and the identities of interested parties make probate undesirable, or when third parties require a court order to accept a title change. Proper documentation and compliance with notice rules are essential for success.
Proving that an asset was intended to be part of a trust relies on documentary and testimonial evidence. Key documents include the trust agreement, any trust funding schedules, deeds or transfer forms, correspondence that references funding the trust, and records of meetings or communications with attorneys or financial institutions. Declarations from the trustee or individuals who discussed the decedent’s intentions can corroborate the documentary record and help create a persuasive narrative for the court. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence, the stronger the petition will be. Notes, emails, drafts of transfer documents, and statements from professionals involved in the estate planning can be particularly helpful. Courts look for a combination of objective documentation and credible testimony that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and that any failure to retitle was inadvertent rather than intentional.
While a successful Heggstad petition can result in court recognition that an asset is trust property and thus avoid probate for that asset, it does not guarantee avoidance of all probate-related proceedings in every case. If other assets or circumstances require formal probate, or if heirs assert competing claims, additional proceedings may still be necessary. The Heggstad petition specifically addresses the ownership status of particular assets and can reduce the need for probate for those assets when the court grants the requested relief. Whether probate is entirely avoided depends on the totality of the estate’s assets and any legal obligations such as creditor claims or contested issues. In some situations, combining a Heggstad petition with other estate administration steps results in efficient resolution, but trustees should be prepared for the possibility that further probate procedures might still be required for unrelated matters.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the case, the court’s calendar, and whether interested parties object. In uncontested matters with complete documentation, a petition may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. The filing, service, and waiting periods for responses are set by court rules, and some counties have longer processing times. The process is generally faster when records are organized and beneficiaries are cooperative. If objections arise or additional evidence is needed, the process can extend several months or longer. Real estate matters that require separate title company review or additional litigation to clear complications will also increase timeframes. Early preparation and clear evidence help keep the process on an efficient track and reduce the likelihood of extended court involvement.
When filing a Heggstad petition, the trustee must provide notice to interested parties as required by California probate rules. Notice typically goes to beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law who would stand to inherit if there were no trust, and any known creditors or lienholders. Proper service ensures that those with potential claims or objections have an opportunity to respond and protects the procedural validity of the court’s eventual order. Failing to serve required parties can lead to procedural delays or challenges to the petition’s validity. It is important to prepare accurate notice lists and to track service to demonstrate compliance. When parties are cooperative, notice can sometimes lead to stipulations that streamline the court’s consideration, while contested notice scenarios often require additional time and legal briefing.
Heggstad petitions commonly address real estate, bank accounts, brokerage accounts, and other titled assets that were intended to be held in a trust but remain under the decedent’s name. Real estate is a frequent subject because deeds are the formal mechanism for ownership and are often overlooked in the funding process. Financial accounts can also be affected when retitling paperwork was not completed or beneficiary designations conflict with trust intentions. Less common but possible subjects include vehicles, business interests, or tangible personal property where title or registration documents show individual ownership despite a trust intent. Each asset type may have specific evidentiary and recording requirements, so tailoring the petition to the asset and coordinating with appropriate third parties is necessary to effectuate corrected ownership.
Yes, banks, title companies, and other third parties may require additional documentation or specific recording language even after the court issues an order. Title companies often request certified copies of the court order and may have particular forms or affidavits they require to issue title insurance or to accept a corrective deed for recording. Financial institutions may need additional verification before transferring accounts into the trustee’s name or releasing funds to the trust. Coordination with these entities early in the process reduces surprises. Preparing recordable instruments and communicating with title officers or bank representatives before filing can ensure that the court’s order will satisfy their internal requirements and that the change in ownership will be recorded and accepted without further complications.
If an heir objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule a hearing to resolve factual disputes. Objecting parties can present contrary evidence about the decedent’s intent or about the circumstances of the transfer. The trustee must then demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the asset was intended to be part of the trust. Objecting parties can prolong the process, require additional discovery, and increase legal costs. When objections arise, effective resolution depends on the strength of documentary evidence and the credibility of witnesses. Sometimes objections are resolved through negotiation or stipulated outcomes that accommodate legitimate concerns. In other cases, the court’s fact-finding process will determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property, resulting in a binding decision that resolves competing claims.
Trustees preparing for a Heggstad hearing should organize and review all pertinent documentation, prepare clear declarations that detail the facts and timeline, and gather any witness statements that corroborate the decedent’s intent. It is important to anticipate questions the court might ask about attempts to fund the trust, communications with financial institutions, and any administrative steps that were taken or overlooked. Preparing exhibits and a succinct narrative of events will help the court understand the basis for the petition. Additionally, trustees should be ready to address potential objections by interested parties and to explain why a judicial declaration is the appropriate remedy. Ensuring that notice procedures were properly followed and that all procedural requirements are met reduces the risk of hearing delays. A calm and well-documented presentation increases the likelihood the court will grant the requested relief.
To get started with a Heggstad petition for an asset in Granite Bay, gather the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Make a list of beneficiaries and potential interested parties who must receive notice. Contact our office to arrange an initial review so we can assess the documentation and advise on the most efficient route to correct title, whether through cooperative measures or a formal petition to the probate court. Once we review your materials, we will outline the procedural steps, potential timelines, and likely evidence needed to support the petition. We assist in preparing the petition, serving required notices, coordinating with title companies or financial institutions, and representing the trustee at any hearing necessary to obtain a court order recognizing the asset as trust property.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas