If you are considering changing the terms of an existing trust in Granite Bay, a trust modification petition may be the legal path to follow. Trust modifications can address changed family circumstances, updated property holdings, or errors in the original trust document. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients in evaluating whether a petition is appropriate, what evidence will support the request, and how state law in California will influence the outcome. This introductory discussion explains reasons for modification, the typical court process, and practical considerations for trustees and beneficiaries when pursuing changes to trust terms.
Understanding the trust modification process early can save time, reduce conflict, and protect assets for heirs and beneficiaries. In many cases, parties seek modifications to correct drafting mistakes, address changed care needs for family members, or account for new assets not contemplated by the original document. The decision to file a petition involves legal strategy, factual development, and careful drafting to convince a probate court to allow the requested change. This overview explains who may petition, how notice works, and the kinds of relief courts typically grant so you can make informed choices about moving forward.
A trust modification petition offers a formal legal route to adjust trust terms when circumstances have changed or errors must be corrected. Pursuing a petition can preserve family wealth, ensure intended distributions are honored, and avoid future disputes among beneficiaries. When handled correctly, modification petitions provide clarity and enforceability under California law, helping trustees fulfill fiduciary duties and petitioners secure relief that aligns the trust with current realities. The process also creates a public record of changes, which can reduce ambiguity and limit later litigation by providing a court-approved solution for managing complex asset or family dynamics.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California, including Granite Bay, with a focus on estate planning and trust administration. Our office guides clients through the full lifecycle of trust matters, from drafting trust instruments such as revocable living trusts and pour-over wills to addressing contested issues like modification petitions and Heggstad petitions. We combine careful legal analysis with practical planning to help clients manage family concerns, protect assets, and secure court approvals when necessary. Communication, thorough document review, and thoughtful courtroom preparation are central to how we serve families facing trust modification matters.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court to alter the terms of an existing trust. Reasons for filing vary, including correcting mistakes, reflecting changed intentions of the settlor, addressing changed family or financial circumstances, or resolving ambiguities that cause disputes among beneficiaries. The petitioner must present legal grounds and supporting evidence, and notice is typically provided to interested parties. The court evaluates whether modification is permissible under the trust terms and California law, balancing the settlor’s original intent with current needs. This process ensures changes are legally enforceable and protects the rights of beneficiaries and trustees.
Not every desired change will qualify for a modification, and some adjustments may be handled outside of court through agreement among beneficiaries and the trustee. When a court petition is necessary, the filing typically includes a proposed amended trust instrument, declarations supporting the requested change, and legal citations explaining the requested relief. The court considers procedural requirements, such as proper notice and the capacity or consent of the settlor if living. Procedural complexities and evidentiary rules mean careful preparation is essential to maximize the likelihood of a favorable outcome and to reduce the chance of subsequent challenges.
A trust modification petition asks a court to authorize changes to an existing trust document or its administration. The petition can request anything from a narrow correction of language to a broader amendment of trust terms to reflect a changed intent or circumstances. Petitioners commonly seek clarification of ambiguous provisions, removal or replacement of trustees, or reallocation of trust assets. The court may modify the trust if it finds legal authority to do so, including consent provisions in the trust, the settlor’s intent as demonstrated by evidence, or statutory authority when equitable relief is proper. The result is a court-ordered amendment that binds future administration.
Successful trust modification petitions depend on clear grounds, persuasive documentation, and compliance with procedural rules. Key elements include identifying the parties with standing, preparing a proposed amended trust, assembling declarations and exhibits to support the requested change, and serving appropriate notice to beneficiaries and interested parties. The court may hold a hearing to evaluate objections and evidence. In some matters, settlement discussions or alternative dispute resolution can resolve disputes without a contested hearing. Attention to filing requirements, statutory timelines, and local probate rules helps ensure the process moves forward efficiently and with the best chance of a durable resolution.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters makes it easier to follow the legal process and participate in decisions. Important concepts include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, Heggstad petition, petition to modify, notice of petition, and capacity. Each term relates to roles, documents, or procedures that shape how a trust is interpreted and modified in court. Familiarity with these terms can reduce confusion during filings and hearings, and helps clients grasp the legal rationale courts use when deciding whether to permit a change to trust provisions under California law.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and set out its original terms. The settlor’s intent, as expressed in the trust document and related evidence, is central to any petition seeking modification. Courts will interpret whether the requested changes align with what the settlor intended when establishing the trust, and whether subsequent events or errors justify a change. In some cases, a living settlor can consent to modification, while courts may allow changes after a settlor’s death when the original intent is ambiguous or no longer workable due to changed circumstances.
A Heggstad petition is a specific probate court filing used to transfer assets that were intended to fund a trust but were never properly transferred. The petition asks the court to impose trust terms on those assets as if they had been included. Heggstad petitions often accompany trust administration and can affect modification matters when asset classification or distribution is in dispute. The petition requires evidence showing the settlor intended certain assets to be part of the trust and explanation for why the transfer did not occur as planned, so the court can equitably correct the oversight.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets, administering distributions, and carrying out the terms of the trust. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including the duty to act prudently and in beneficiaries’ best interests. When a trust modification petition seeks changes to administration or trustee powers, the role of the trustee and potential conflicts of interest are closely examined by the court. Trustees may also be petitioners seeking guidance or court approval for actions that affect trust terms or asset distribution.
A pour-over will works alongside a trust by directing assets that were not transferred into the trust during the settlor’s lifetime to be distributed into the trust at death. When trust modification or funding issues arise, a pour-over will can influence estate administration and the court’s considerations about asset allocation. If assets are left outside the trust, petitions like Heggstad petitions or other probate filings may be necessary to place those assets under trust terms, and modifications to the trust may be requested to address how pour-over assets should be handled once they reach the trust.
When trust issues surface, there are several legal options to consider, including informal agreement among beneficiaries, nonjudicial settlement agreements, and formal court petitions for modification. Informal resolution can be faster and less expensive but requires the consent of all relevant parties. A court petition provides a binding, enforceable decision that can address contested matters, correct errors, and protect fiduciary duties, though it may be more time-consuming. Evaluating the risks, the likelihood of agreement, and the need for a public record will guide the choice between negotiation and filing a petition in probate court.
A limited or informal approach is often suitable when all interested parties, including beneficiaries and the trustee, agree on the desired change. In such situations, parties can execute a written amendment or a nonjudicial settlement agreement that documents the new terms without court involvement. This route can save time and expense and maintain privacy. Proper documentation and careful review are essential to ensure the amendment complies with the trust instrument and applicable California law, and to minimize the risk of later disputes that might require court resolution.
When proposed changes are procedural or administrative in nature, such as updating contact information for trustees or correcting typographical errors, a limited approach can be adequate. Trustees may be able to implement these adjustments through internal records and beneficiary notifications without seeking judicial approval. Still, careful documentation helps prevent confusion and ensures transparency. For more substantive changes or when beneficiaries disagree, seeking court approval may be a safer alternative to ensure changes are legally binding and enforceable.
Comprehensive legal support becomes important when trust modifications are contested or when trust language is ambiguous and open to differing interpretations. In such cases, evidence, witness declarations, and legal argument are often required to persuade a court. A skilled legal team guides the collection of relevant records, prepares persuasive filings, and represents clients at hearings so the court can render a clear ruling. This structured approach reduces the risk of future litigation by creating a definitive, enforceable outcome that addresses the ambiguity or dispute that prompted the petition.
When a trust involves substantial assets, blended family dynamics, or competing creditor claims, comprehensive legal support helps protect the interests of beneficiaries and the integrity of trust administration. Complex factual issues may require forensic accounting, valuations, or coordination with financial advisors. Legal counsel coordinates these efforts and presents cohesive evidence and legal arguments in court. Thorough preparation and careful legal strategy reduce uncertainty, safeguard assets, and help ensure that any court-approved modifications serve the settlor’s intentions and the beneficiaries’ legitimate needs.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification provides clarity and legal protection when making changes to trust terms. By addressing potential objections, documenting the rationale for change, and securing court approval when needed, the process helps prevent future disputes and creates a clear administrative framework. This approach also assures beneficiaries that the change was considered carefully, with legal standards applied to protect their interests. Strategic planning in advance of a petition can streamline court proceedings and result in a durable modification that aligns with current circumstances.
Comprehensive legal handling also helps manage relationships among family members and beneficiaries during what can be a sensitive transition. Clear communication, mediation where possible, and well-drafted court filings contribute to smoother outcomes. Financial and tax implications can be identified and addressed as part of the process, reducing unintended consequences. Ultimately, a thoughtful, well-documented approach provides peace of mind and legal certainty for trustees and beneficiaries who want the trust to function as intended for the long term.
When a modification petition is supported by thorough documentation and persuasive legal argument, the court can issue an order that provides finality and reduces the likelihood of future challenges. A court-approved modification clarifies the trust’s terms and creates an enforceable directive for trustees and beneficiaries. This legal certainty helps trustees administer assets with confidence and provides beneficiaries with a clear understanding of their rights. By addressing foreseeable objections and providing supporting evidence up front, comprehensive preparation strengthens the position presented to the court.
A comprehensive process helps protect beneficiary interests by ensuring any modifications serve legitimate needs and are consistent with legal standards. Careful review of asset ownership, trust funding, and potential creditor issues helps preserve estate value. Addressing tax considerations and coordinating with financial professionals can minimize negative consequences. By proactively resolving disputes through court-approved modifications or well-documented agreements, families can reduce litigation risk and keep trust assets focused on the long-term benefit of intended recipients.
When pursuing a trust modification, carefully document why the change is needed and how it reflects the settlor’s intent or changing circumstances. Collect communications, medical records if capacity is at issue, financial statements, and any drafts of the trust that show the settlor’s prior intent. Clear evidence helps the court understand the rationale for modifying the trust and protects petitioners from later challenges. Good documentation also facilitates discussion with beneficiaries and provides a written record that can be used to support a nonjudicial agreement when possible.
Before pursuing a contested petition in court, explore opportunities for settlement or mediation between trustees and beneficiaries. Open discussions can lead to mutually agreeable amendments or nonjudicial settlement agreements that avoid the time and cost of litigation. When settlement is not possible, having a record of good-faith negotiation can be helpful in court. If litigation becomes necessary, maintain professionalism in communications and preserve relevant documents, as courts often consider whether parties attempted resolution before seeking judicial intervention.
People consider trust modification petitions for a range of reasons, including correcting drafting errors, updating distributions to reflect new family circumstances, or addressing trustee incapacity or misconduct. Other common motivations include incorporating newly acquired assets into the trust, resolving ambiguities that cause administration problems, or aligning trust terms with changed tax or financial planning goals. A petition provides a formal avenue to make changes when informal amendment is impossible or when a binding court order is needed to protect beneficiaries and trustees from future disputes.
Trust modifications can also be appropriate when a settlor’s original wishes are difficult to carry out due to unforeseen changes, such as property transfers that were never completed or the death of a named beneficiary. In those scenarios, a court-approved modification can preserve the settlor’s overall intent while adjusting specifics to current realities. Where family dynamics or conflicting interests exist, obtaining judicial approval through a petition creates clarity, offers enforceable guidance to trustees, and reduces the risk of protracted litigation after the modification is implemented.
Certain recurring situations prompt trust modification petitions, such as mistakes in the original trust instrument, the need to replace an unavailable or unwilling trustee, or changes in beneficiary needs. Additional reasons include dealing with assets that were intended for the trust but never transferred, managing blended family issues, or addressing elder care needs that require reallocation of assets. Courts review the facts and legal basis for a modification request, and filing a petition can provide a definitive resolution that addresses these practical and relational challenges.
One common circumstance leading to a petition is when assets that should have funded the trust were never properly transferred, leaving them in the settlor’s name or elsewhere. A Heggstad petition or related filing can ask the court to recognize those assets as part of the trust as the settlor intended. This factual issue often requires documentary evidence showing intent and demonstrates why a court order is appropriate to align asset ownership with the trust’s terms and preserve the settlor’s estate plan.
Changes such as births, deaths, marriages, divorces, or altered financial needs of beneficiaries frequently lead to requests to modify trust terms. Courts may permit changes when the original trust language no longer serves the settlor’s intent or when adjustments are necessary to provide for dependents. Petitioners must demonstrate that the proposed modification is consistent with the overall plan and that it fairly addresses the new circumstances while protecting the rights of other beneficiaries.
Drafting errors, omissions, or ambiguous provisions can make administering a trust difficult or lead to disputes among beneficiaries. When such issues prevent proper administration, a modification petition can correct mistakes and clarify the settlor’s intent. Evidence such as earlier drafts, communications from the settlor, or surrounding circumstances may be used to support the proposed change. Courts aim to preserve the settlor’s intent where possible while ensuring the trust can be administered fairly and effectively.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local support for residents of Granite Bay and surrounding Placer County communities seeking trust modification assistance. We help clients understand their options, prepare petitions, and pursue appropriate court orders when informal resolution is not possible. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful document preparation, and practical solutions to help families navigate the emotional and legal challenges that often accompany trust disputes. Clients can expect timely responses and focused representation tailored to the local probate procedures and rules.
Choosing legal representation for a trust modification matter requires trust in the attorney’s ability to manage both legal and interpersonal aspects of the dispute. Our firm emphasizes meticulous preparation, clear explanation of options, and steady guidance through each procedural step. We work closely with clients to gather necessary evidence, prepare filings, and address beneficiary concerns while keeping clients informed about likely timelines and potential outcomes. The goal is to achieve a durable solution that aligns with the settlor’s intentions and protects beneficiary interests.
We prioritize practical solutions that minimize time in court when resolution outside of litigation is possible, while remaining prepared to present a persuasive record when court action is necessary. Our office coordinates with financial professionals, accountants, and mediators as needed to address valuations, tax implications, and family dynamics. Clients benefit from a methodical process that anticipates questions, addresses disputes proactively, and aims to reach outcomes that reduce the likelihood of later challenges or administrative complications.
Clients in Granite Bay and across California turn to our firm for clear guidance on how to proceed with trust modification petitions, Heggstad matters, or related probate filings. We help petitioners gather documentation, prepare declarations, serve notice properly, and present proposed amendments in a manner consistent with state statutes and local probate court expectations. Our goal is to minimize stress for families, provide a predictable process, and secure court orders that support effective trust administration for the future.
When engaged on a trust modification matter, we begin with a comprehensive review of the trust document and related records to identify legal grounds for change and potential obstacles. Next, we collect evidence to support the petition, draft the proposed amended trust and declarations, and handle service of notice to all interested parties. If settlement is possible, we pursue negotiation or mediation. If litigation is necessary, we prepare concise appellate-ready pleadings and represent clients at hearings. Throughout, we emphasize clear client communication and timely updates on next steps and expected timelines.
The first step involves a detailed intake and document review to determine whether a trust modification petition is appropriate. We examine the trust instrument, related wills, asset titles, correspondence, and any prior amendments to identify inconsistencies or grounds for change. We also review beneficiary lists, trustee appointments, and funding status of the trust. This assessment helps determine the legal theory for a petition, whether settlement is feasible, and what evidence will be needed to support the requested modification in probate court.
Collecting evidence is critical to showing why a modification is justified. This may include financial records, trust drafts, communications from the settlor, medical records if capacity is at issue, and documentation of asset ownership. We guide clients in identifying and preserving these materials, prepare declarations summarizing key facts, and coordinate any necessary third-party records. Strong factual support improves the clarity of the petition and helps the court evaluate whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intentions and the legal standards for modification.
Simultaneously with evidence gathering, we evaluate opportunities for settlement or a nonjudicial settlement agreement. When beneficiaries and trustees are willing to negotiate, formalizing an agreed amendment can avoid court involvement. We draft proposals that protect client interests and include clear terms for execution and implementation. If settlement discussions fail or are impractical due to disagreement, we prepare to file a petition supported by the assembled evidence and legal argument to seek judicial resolution.
Once the necessary documents and evidence are prepared, we file the petition for trust modification in the appropriate probate court and ensure all required parties receive notice. The filing typically includes the petition, proposed amended trust, supporting declarations, and a proposed order for the court. Proper service is essential and may involve personal service, mail, or publication depending on the circumstances. We handle the procedural details to reduce the risk of delays or challenges based on defective notice.
Drafting clear, persuasive court filings is a central part of the petition process. We prepare a petition that lays out the legal basis for modification, attaches supporting evidence, and submits a proposed order for the judge to consider. The proposed order is drafted to reflect the specific relief requested and to assist the court in issuing a precise and enforceable decision. Attention to local court rules and formatting requirements helps prevent procedural setbacks and keeps the case on schedule.
Proper notification of beneficiaries and interested parties is required so those affected have an opportunity to respond. We coordinate service of the petition and related documents in compliance with California probate rules, ensuring each party receives adequate notice and an explanation of rights to object. Ongoing communication with interested parties can sometimes produce agreements that render a contested hearing unnecessary, but when objections arise, the record will reflect that proper notice was provided and parties had a fair opportunity to participate.
After filing and service, the court may set a hearing to consider objections and evaluate the evidence. We represent clients at hearings, present declarations and testimony as needed, and respond to opposing arguments. If the court approves the modification, it will issue an order that becomes part of the trust record. We then assist with implementing the order, updating trust instruments, retitling assets as necessary, and advising trustees on administration consistent with the modified terms so the trust operates smoothly going forward.
At the hearing, the court evaluates the evidence supporting the petition and considers objections from interested parties. We present clear factual declarations, documentary proof, and legal argument tailored to the court’s standards. Addressing objections may involve highlighting the settlor’s intent, clarifying ambiguous provisions, or demonstrating why a proposed modification furthers the trust’s purpose. Effective presentation at this stage can secure the court order needed to finalize changes and provide a strong, defensible record in the event of later disputes.
Once the court approves a modification, implementing the order requires updating trust documents and making any necessary transfers or administrative changes. We prepare the amended trust documents, assist with re-titling assets into the trust if needed, and advise trustees on fulfilling new duties or distribution instructions. Clear implementation helps prevent administrative errors and ensures that the modified trust functions as intended for beneficiaries, reducing the risk of further litigation or confusion.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing requesting a change to the terms or administration of an existing trust. It is typically used when informal amendment is not possible due to disagreement among beneficiaries, ambiguities in the trust document, or issues that require judicial authority, such as correcting a drafting error or addressing untransferred assets. The petition outlines the requested change, the legal basis for relief, and supporting evidence so the court can determine whether modification is appropriate under California law. The petition is often accompanied by a proposed amended trust, declarations explaining facts and intent, and documentation showing why the change better serves the trust’s purpose. The court reviews notice to interested parties and may hold a hearing to consider objections. If the court approves the petition, it issues an order that makes the modification binding and enforceable, providing clarity for trustees and beneficiaries moving forward.
In California, parties who may have standing to file a petition include trustees seeking clarification or instruction, beneficiaries affected by trust terms, or sometimes successors with a direct interest in administration. If the settlor is alive and has capacity, their consent often allows for nonjudicial modifications. When a settlor is incapacitated or deceased, interested parties may petition the court to resolve disputes or correct problems that prevent proper administration. Identifying the correct petitioners depends on the specific facts and the trust language. Determining who should file requires review of the trust instrument and the relationships among those involved. Notice must be provided to all interested parties to ensure due process. Working with counsel helps clarify standing, prepares proper service, and ensures the petition is filed in the appropriate court with the supporting evidence needed to proceed.
A living settlor of a revocable trust generally has broad authority to amend or revoke the trust without court action, provided they have the required mental capacity and follow any amendment provisions in the trust document. When a settlor is able to act and the trust terms allow it, a simple written amendment executed according to the instrument’s requirements can often accomplish desired changes without court involvement. This approach preserves privacy and avoids the time and expense of litigation. However, if the settlor lacks capacity, is unavailable, or beneficiaries and trustees disagree about a requested change, filing a petition may be necessary to obtain court approval. Similarly, when errors or funding issues exist, a petition such as a Heggstad filing or a formal modification petition may be required to achieve a binding remedy under California probate rules.
Courts consider a variety of evidence in a modification petition, including the trust document itself, prior drafts, communications from the settlor, and records demonstrating intent or factual circumstances that justify change. When capacity is at issue, medical records or expert evaluations may be relevant. Financial documents and asset titles are often reviewed when funding or ownership concerns are implicated. Declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent or the circumstances prompting the modification may also be presented. The strength of the evidentiary record is important to persuading a judge that modification is appropriate. Clear, well-organized documentation that ties the requested change to the settlor’s intent and the trust’s purpose increases the likelihood the court will approve the petition and issue an order that stands up to future challenges.
The timeline for trust modification varies based on case complexity, whether beneficiaries consent, and local court schedules. Uncontested matters with full agreement can be resolved relatively quickly, sometimes within a few months if filings are straightforward and notice requirements are met. Contested petitions, complex evidentiary disputes, or matters requiring additional discovery or expert input can extend the timeline, potentially taking many months or longer to resolve through hearings and court orders. Early preparation and clear communication with interested parties can shorten the process. Properly prepared filings that anticipate likely objections and meet all procedural requirements also help keep the case on track. Working with experienced counsel familiar with local probate rules and court procedures can streamline scheduling and presentation of the case to the court.
A Heggstad petition is a specific type of probate filing used when assets intended to be part of a trust were not properly transferred into the trust during the settlor’s lifetime. The petition asks the court to treat those assets as if they had been included in the trust based on the settlor’s demonstrated intent. Heggstad petitions commonly arise alongside trust administration and can influence modification discussions when asset classification affects proposed changes or distributions. To succeed on a Heggstad petition, petitioners present evidence such as drafts, correspondence, or other proof showing the settlor intended the assets to be part of the trust. The court evaluates that evidence and decides whether to impose the trust’s terms on those assets, which can simplify administration and align asset ownership with the settlor’s estate plan.
Beneficiaries can challenge a trust modification by filing objections with the court during the notice period or at a scheduled hearing. Challenges may assert that the proposed modification contradicts the settlor’s intent, was improperly obtained, or harms a beneficiary’s rights. When objections are raised, the court evaluates competing evidence and legal arguments to determine whether the modification should be allowed. Successful challenges often require demonstrating that the proposed change is inconsistent with the trust document or unsupported by the facts. Because challenges are possible, petitioners should prepare a strong evidentiary record and comply with notice rules to mitigate the risk of setbacks. Engaging in settlement discussions can sometimes resolve objections without a contested hearing, but when disputes persist, persuasive presentation of facts and law in court is necessary to obtain a binding resolution.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiating a nonjudicial settlement agreement among beneficiaries and the trustee or executing an amendment if the settlor is able and willing to do so. These alternatives can preserve privacy and reduce expense when all relevant parties consent to the change. Mediation and facilitated negotiation are useful tools for resolving disputes without court intervention, especially when family relationships make collaborative resolution desirable. When full agreement is not achievable or when legal authority is lacking for a proposed change, a court petition may be the only practical route to obtain binding relief. Exploring alternatives early, however, remains a worthwhile step to determine whether a voluntary agreement is feasible before incurring the time and cost of litigation.
Modifying a trust can have tax consequences depending on the nature of the change and the assets involved. Changes to ownership, beneficiary designations, or distribution timing can affect estate tax exposure, income tax treatment, and retirement account rules. It is important to consider tax implications before implementing substantial modifications, and to coordinate changes with financial and tax advisors as needed to minimize adverse effects. Because tax considerations can be complex, thoughtful planning and advice help avoid unintended consequences. When preparing a petition or negotiated amendment, including a review of potential tax outcomes and any necessary steps to preserve favorable treatment will provide more predictable results for beneficiaries and trustees.
Before seeking a modification, gather all relevant documents such as the original trust, any amendments, related wills or pour-over wills, asset titles, account statements, and communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. Medical records or capacity evaluations may be important if capacity is at issue. Also identify and list beneficiaries and trustees and note how assets are currently titled. Organizing this information early streamlines the petition process and helps counsel assess the strength of the case. Preserving relevant evidence and avoiding unnecessary disclosure helps protect your position during negotiations or court proceedings. Thoughtful preparation, including consultation with counsel about which documents are necessary and how best to present them, improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduces the risk of procedural missteps that can delay resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas