A trust modification petition can help Trustees and beneficiaries adjust the terms of an existing trust to reflect changed circumstances, correct errors, or address unforeseen tax and asset issues. At Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist residents of Kings Beach and the surrounding Placer County area in evaluating whether a court petition is appropriate and in preparing the necessary filings. Whether the change is minor or requires court review, we focus on clear communication, careful document review, and practical solutions that seek to protect family relationships while complying with California trust law and local court procedures.
Many families and Trustees delay addressing needed changes because they are unsure of the process or concerned about conflict. A trust modification petition provides a structured legal path to amend trust terms when consent is not possible or when formal court approval is preferred. Our approach is to identify the desired outcome, review the trust and related estate planning documents, and explain options in straightforward terms. We help clients weigh settlement discussions, notice requirements, and possible hearings so they can make informed decisions that reflect their current circumstances and future goals.
Filing a trust modification petition can be important when a trust no longer fits the testator’s intent or when changes in family dynamics, tax law, or financial circumstances create a need to alter distribution plans. The benefits include obtaining a court-sanctioned resolution, clarifying trustee powers, and preventing future disputes by making formal changes on the record. A properly prepared petition and supporting documentation reduce ambiguity, help protect fiduciary duties, and may resolve conflicts without lengthy litigation. Our goal is to secure durable outcomes that reflect your goals while minimizing disruption to family relationships and estate administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients across California, including Kings Beach and Placer County, offering a wide range of estate planning services such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, advanced directives, and trust petitions. Robert P. Bergman brings years of experience advising trustees and families on trust administration, modifications, and court proceedings. Our practice emphasizes practical guidance, careful drafting, and responsive client communication. We combine knowledge of state and local court rules with attention to each client’s unique family and financial situation to pursue solutions that align with long-term estate planning objectives.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that requests permission to change, add to, or clarify terms of an existing trust when direct amendment is not possible or when there are disputes among interested parties. California law allows modifications for various reasons, including correcting mistakes, addressing changed circumstances, or clarifying ambiguous language. The process typically requires review of the trust instrument, notice to beneficiaries and interested parties, and submission of factual and legal support to the court. Petition outcomes can include formal orders approving amendments, instructions for trust administration, or guidance resolving contested interpretations.
Reasons to pursue a petition vary from minor drafting errors to significant changes in marital status, financial holdings, or the health and needs of beneficiaries. When beneficiaries cannot all agree or when a Trustee needs judicial direction, a petition can provide clarity and legal authority to move forward. The timeline depends on the complexity of the issues and the court’s calendar, and it can involve settlement discussions and negotiations to narrow disputes. Throughout, careful documentation and clear legal argumentation improve prospects for a timely and favorable resolution.
A trust modification petition asks the probate or superior court to approve changes to a trust or to interpret unclear provisions. It is not an informal change but a formal request supported by declarations, exhibits, and legal citations. The petition should show why the change is appropriate, identify affected parties, and include proposals for notice and service. Courts evaluate whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent and statutory standards. Outcomes can include orders that modify trust language, confirm Trustee actions, or provide instructions to guide future administration of trust assets in accordance with the court’s determination.
Successful petitions rely on several key elements: a clear statement of the requested modification, factual declarations explaining why the change is needed, supporting documentation such as the original trust and related estate planning instruments, and proper notice to all interested parties. The process often begins with a thorough review, followed by drafting the petition and serving required notices. Negotiations or mediation may resolve issues prior to a hearing, and if litigation proceeds the court will consider evidence and legal authority before issuing an order. Attention to procedural requirements and thoughtful advocacy help advance a favorable result.
Understanding common estate planning terms helps clients navigate petitions and court interactions. Terms like revocable living trust, pour-over will, Heggstad petition, and certification of trust frequently arise when considering modifications or administration. A clear grasp of these concepts reduces surprises and supports informed decision making. The following glossary entries explain core concepts and how they relate to petitions, notices, and trust administration. Familiarity with these terms can make communications with counsel more efficient and improve collaboration among Trustees, beneficiaries, and family members during the modification process.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement where the settlor transfers assets into a trust managed by a Trustee for beneficiaries, and retains the ability to revoke or modify the trust during their lifetime. These trusts are commonly used to avoid probate, manage assets if incapacity occurs, and control distribution terms after death. Because the settlor can change the trust, petitions sometimes arise when the settlor’s intent is unclear or when circumstances make amendment necessary. Revocable trusts provide flexibility but require careful drafting and administration to maintain their intended benefits and to address any future needed modifications.
A pour-over will works alongside a trust to transfer any assets that were not placed into the trust before the settlor’s death, effectively directing those assets into the trust for distribution. It acts as a safety net to ensure assets are ultimately governed by the settlor’s estate plan. While a pour-over will does not avoid probate on its own, it complements trust administration by providing a mechanism to consolidate assets into the trust. When a trust is modified, the coordination between the trust and any related pour-over will should be reviewed to confirm that both instruments continue to reflect the settlor’s goals.
A Heggstad petition is a type of filing used to establish that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust even if title to those assets was not formally transferred. Under California law, this petition can be used to confirm that assets outside the trust should be treated as trust property based on evidence of intent. This remedy helps Trustees and heirs avoid disputes about asset ownership at administration or after death. When pursuing or defending against such a petition, clear documentation and coherent factual statements are essential to demonstrate intent and to seek the court’s recognition of trust ownership.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a court to change, interpret, or correct terms of an existing trust when informal amendments are not possible or when parties disagree. The petition outlines the proposed modification, the reasons for the change, and the legal basis for relief. It includes notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties and may proceed through negotiations, mediation, or a court hearing. The court’s order will provide legal authority for the change and help Trustees implement revised administration consistent with the ruling and the settlor’s intentions.
When considering changes to a trust, options include informal amendment by the settlor, consensual agreements among beneficiaries, or a formal petition to court. Informal changes are the least disruptive but require the settlor’s capacity and proper execution. Consensual agreements can resolve issues without court involvement when all parties cooperate. A court petition is appropriate when parties disagree or when legal authority is needed to address defects or ambiguities. Each path has tradeoffs related to cost, time, confidentiality, and the degree of finality, so selecting the right option depends on the family dynamics and the nature of the requested change.
Certain situations call for small, administrative adjustments that do not alter beneficiaries’ substantive rights or distribution percentages. Examples include correcting names, updating contact details, or clarifying trustee succession language. When the settlor is able to sign amendments and all parties are in agreement, these changes can often be handled without court involvement. Handling such matters privately tends to be quicker and less costly, and it helps preserve family privacy. Still, even minor changes should be documented carefully to avoid future misunderstandings and to maintain alignment with the larger estate plan.
When every beneficiary agrees to a proposed modification, parties can often execute a written amendment or a settlement agreement to address the change without formal court proceedings. This cooperative route minimizes litigation risk and can be tailored to reflect the mutual understanding of those involved. It is important that agreements are drafted with attention to legal formalities, signed properly, and recorded if necessary to ensure enforceability. Even in unanimous situations, professional guidance helps ensure the amendment aligns with statutory requirements and preserves the trust’s intended benefits.
Disputes among beneficiaries over interpretation, distribution, or Trustee actions often make a comprehensive legal approach advisable. When conflict exists, careful planning is needed to gather evidence, prepare persuasive legal arguments, and pursue resolution through negotiation, mediation, or court proceedings. A measured approach helps protect fiduciary duties and the integrity of the estate plan while seeking outcomes that are fair and sustainable. Managing disputes with attention to both legal strategy and family dynamics increases the likelihood of reaching a resolution that minimizes prolonged litigation and preserves valuable relationships.
Complex estates that involve business interests, retirement accounts, or potential tax consequences often require a broader legal review before any modification is implemented. Changes to trust terms can have unintended tax implications or affect creditor protection and beneficiary rights. A comprehensive approach examines how a proposed modification interacts with retirement plan trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, and other planning vehicles. Evaluating these connections helps avoid adverse outcomes and supports a modification that advances the settlor’s objectives while respecting applicable tax and fiduciary rules.
Taking a comprehensive approach ensures that proposed modifications are consistent with the entire estate plan and with long term goals of the settlor. By reviewing related documents such as powers of attorney, advance directives, and beneficiary designations, potential conflicts can be identified and addressed proactively. This method reduces the likelihood of future disputes, unintended tax consequences, or administrative complications. A coordinated review also enables Trustees and families to implement changes that align with financial planning and retirement arrangements, creating a more reliable framework for asset management and distribution.
Another benefit of a comprehensive review is the opportunity to improve clarity and create stronger documentation for the trust administration process. Clear language and well-documented intentions reduce ambiguity and make it easier for Trustees to carry out their duties. When a court-approved modification is obtained, it provides a formal record that can discourage future challenges and streamline the administration process. This protective effect helps preserve family resources by potentially avoiding costly disputes and ensuring that the settlor’s wishes are carried out as intended.
When a trust modification is handled comprehensively, including clear drafting and proper court approval if needed, the risk of future legal challenges is often reduced. A court order or well drafted amendment creates an authoritative record that supports the Trustee’s decisions and clarifies beneficiary rights. This reduces uncertainty and the potential for disagreements that can escalate into litigation. By addressing legal, financial, and family considerations together, clients can achieve outcomes that are more durable and less likely to be contested in the future, preserving estate resources and family relationships.
A comprehensive process yields clearer documentation of asset ownership, beneficiary designations, and distribution plans, which simplifies trust administration and reduces administrative delays. Accurate records and coordinated documents make it easier to transfer assets, manage tax reporting, and address creditor claims. This clarity is particularly valuable when trusts interact with retirement plan trusts, special needs arrangements, or irrevocable trusts. Thorough documentation supports Trustees in making informed decisions and helps beneficiaries understand the trust’s provisions, which can reduce disputes and improve compliance with the settlor’s intentions.
Start the process by gathering all relevant estate planning documents including the trust instrument, any amendments, pour-over wills, beneficiary designations, and related financial statements. Complete documentation makes it easier to evaluate the scope of the requested modification and to draft a petition that addresses the court’s likely concerns. Missing information can delay proceedings, complicate notice requirements, and increase the potential for disagreement among interested parties. Taking time to assemble accurate records at the outset reduces friction and supports a smoother path to resolution.
When conflicts arise, alternative dispute resolution approaches such as mediation can offer a less adversarial and more cost effective path than contested court hearings. Mediation encourages parties to discuss options and to craft solutions that reflect their shared interests, often preserving family relationships. Settlements reached through mediation can be memorialized and presented to the court for approval if needed. Considering these options early can reduce emotional stress and financial costs while working toward practical outcomes that meet the needs of Trustees and beneficiaries.
People pursue trust modification petitions for a range of reasons, including changes in family relationships, shifts in financial circumstances, or the discovery of drafting errors that create ambiguity. When the trust no longer reflects the settlor’s current intentions or when a Trustee needs direction to carry out duties, a petition can provide legal clarity. Other reasons include the need to incorporate tax planning updates, to correct property titling issues, or to reconcile inconsistencies between related estate planning documents. A petition creates a formal record that supports durable administration going forward.
Another reason to consider a petition is to protect vulnerable beneficiaries by clarifying distributions and Trustee powers in cases where incapacity, special needs, or creditor issues arise. Formal court approval can reassure financial institutions, successor Trustees, and third parties that the trust’s administration is authorized and lawful. When disputes are likely or when a Trustee seeks protection before taking action, a petition offers a structured route to obtain judicial guidance and to minimize future challenges. Early consideration helps prevent escalation and preserves estate value.
Circumstances that commonly lead to petitions include remarriage, births or deaths in the family, changes to the settlor’s financial portfolio, discovery that assets intended for the trust were never transferred, and conflicts over interpretation of trust language. Tax law changes or shifts in pensions and retirement accounts can also prompt a review. When the settlor cannot or does not execute a direct amendment, or when beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes, a petition provides the route to formalize needed adjustments and protect the integrity of the trust administration.
Events such as marriage, divorce, births, or deaths often alter family dynamics and the settlor’s distribution preferences. These life changes can create the need to update who benefits from the trust or how assets are divided. When direct amendment is not feasible or when there is disagreement among heirs about the consequences of such changes, a petition can formalize adjustments and clarify the settlor’s intent. Timely action after major family events helps ensure the estate plan remains aligned with current relationships and responsibilities.
Shifts in financial circumstances, such as the acquisition or sale of significant assets, or changes in tax law that affect estate planning strategies, can necessitate modifications. A petition may be used to alter distribution timing, implement tax efficient strategies, or update trustee powers to address new asset classes. Reviewing the trust alongside retirement plan trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, and other planning vehicles is often necessary to ensure a modification does not create unintended tax or administrative consequences for beneficiaries and estate administrators.
Drafting errors, ambiguous language, or omitted provisions can cause confusion and conflict during trust administration. When such issues arise, a trust modification petition offers a court-supervised method to correct mistakes and clarify intent. The court can interpret unclear provisions, approve corrections, and issue orders that guide Trustees in carrying out the trust. Addressing errors proactively through a petition protects against later disputes and supports smoother, more predictable administration of the settlor’s assets for the benefit of beneficiaries.
We are here to help residents of Kings Beach and Placer County navigate trust modification matters with practical guidance and careful preparation. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can review your trust documents, advise on legal options, prepare petitions, and represent your interests in negotiations or court proceedings. We handle related estate planning needs as well, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and advance health care directives. For a consultation about a possible trust modification petition, call our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and available next steps.
Clients work with our firm for direct communication, careful document preparation, and a focus on resolving matters efficiently. We aim to explain options in clear language, identify likely outcomes, and tailor our approach to your family’s particular circumstances. Our priority is to provide steady guidance throughout the process, from document review to petition drafting and court filings, while keeping clients informed of progress and next steps. Responsive service and attention to detail help clients feel confident in how their trust matters are being handled.
Because state law and local court practices affect petition strategy, our firm emphasizes knowledge of California probate and trust procedure when evaluating and pursuing modifications. We work to ensure filings meet procedural requirements and to coordinate notices and service of process to interested parties. That familiarity with local rules can reduce procedural delays and support a smoother path through the court system. Our goal is to balance effective legal advocacy with efforts to resolve matters efficiently whenever possible.
We provide comprehensive estate planning services that complement petition work, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, financial powers of attorney, health care directives, and special arrangements like special needs trusts and pet trusts. Addressing these documents together helps create a cohesive plan and decreases the risk of inconsistencies. When modifications are needed, a coordinated review enables changes that are consistent with broader planning goals and that consider interactions among trusts, retirement plan trusts, and insurance related vehicles.
Our process begins with a careful intake and document review, proceeds through targeted preparation of a petition or settlement documents, and includes clear communication about notice and potential timelines. We seek to identify opportunities for resolution before litigation and to prepare a persuasive factual and legal record when a court filing is necessary. Throughout, we provide guidance on settlement options, mediation, and litigation prospects, helping clients choose the path that best aligns with their objectives while attending to procedural requirements and timelines dictated by the court.
The first step is to collect and review the trust instrument, all amendments, related estate planning documents, and records of asset ownership. This review identifies any defects, ambiguous provisions, or assets that were intended for the trust but not transferred. We also determine who must be notified and who has an interest in the petition. A thorough initial review lays the groundwork for drafting a petition that addresses relevant facts, provides necessary exhibits, and anticipates likely questions from beneficiaries or the court.
Gathering complete documentation includes the original trust, all amendments or side letters, pour-over wills, beneficiary designations for retirement accounts, insurance trust documents, and financial statements. Copies of communications with beneficiaries and records of asset transfer are also important. Having a comprehensive file helps clarify what changes are necessary and provides the supporting evidence for the petition. Accurate documents reduce delays and support the credibility of factual declarations submitted to the court in connection with the requested modification.
A critical early task is to identify all interested parties, including beneficiaries, current and successor Trustees, and any potential creditors or legal representatives. Proper identification ensures that statutory notice requirements are satisfied and that the court and involved parties receive the information they need to respond. Mapping interests also helps anticipate possible objections and supports strategy for negotiation or settlement. Clear notice and thorough identification of stakeholders protect procedural rights and help move the matter toward resolution.
Once the facts are established, we draft a petition that explains the requested modification, sets out the factual basis, and cites relevant law. The petition is accompanied by declarations and exhibits that document intent and asset ownership. We then arrange for proper service of notice to all interested parties, and we communicate with beneficiaries to explore settlement possibilities. Timely and accurate notice is essential to protect the process and to give parties an opportunity to respond or to engage in alternative dispute resolution.
Drafting the petition involves describing the requested change, the reasons for it, and the legal grounds for court approval. Supporting declarations include evidence of intent, records of asset transfer, and any documentation showing that the requested modification aligns with the settlor’s goals. The petition must comply with local court formatting and procedural rules, and it should propose a form of order for the court’s consideration. Clear, organized drafting improves the likelihood of a coherent record and helps clarify the relief sought.
Proper service of notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is mandated by law and provides them an opportunity to object or to negotiate a settlement. We coordinate service, prepare proof of service documents, and engage in communications to explain the proposal and potential outcomes. Attempting good faith discussions can narrow disagreements and sometimes leads to acceptable resolutions without a contested hearing. Documentation of these communications and of proper notice is an important part of the petition record for the court’s review.
If parties do not reach agreement, the matter may proceed to a court hearing where evidence is presented and legal arguments are made. The court evaluates whether the modification serves the settlor’s intent and complies with statutory requirements. Following hearings, the court may issue orders approving the requested change, providing interpretation, or setting conditions for amendment. Once an order is entered, documents are updated to reflect the court’s decision, and Trustees follow the directive issued to ensure compliant administration going forward.
At a hearing, parties present declarations, documentary evidence, and legal argument to support their positions. The court considers the settlor’s intent, factual circumstances, and statutory standards when deciding whether to grant the requested relief. Preparation for a hearing includes organizing exhibits, preparing witnesses and declarations, and identifying legal authorities that support the petition. Thorough preparation helps the court understand the rationale for the modification and assists in achieving a clear and enforceable outcome.
After a court issues an order approving or denying a modification, the Trustee and interested parties must update trust records and any related asset titles to reflect the ruling. If the court grants a modification, the order becomes part of the trust’s permanent record and guides future administration. Ensuring that banks, investment accounts, and title records are aligned with the trust’s updated terms prevents confusion and facilitates orderly management of assets. Finalizing administrative tasks promptly helps implement the court’s decision effectively.
A trust modification petition is a formal court request to change, interpret, or correct terms of an existing trust when direct amendment is not feasible or when parties disagree about the trust’s meaning. It asks the court to review the trust instrument and supporting evidence and to enter an order permitting the requested change or providing interpretive guidance. The petition must identify interested parties, explain the legal basis for the change, and include supporting declarations and exhibits that demonstrate why the modification is appropriate. A petition is necessary when the settlor cannot or will not execute an amendment, when beneficiaries are in conflict, or when there are defects, ambiguities, or asset titling issues that require judicial resolution. Filing a petition creates a formal record and can provide the Trustee with legal authority to carry out revised administration. The court’s involvement can reduce future disputes by making the modification part of the official record and by guiding Trustee actions under the updated terms.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the issues, the need for discovery or additional documentation, and the court’s schedule. Simple matters that all parties agree on can move more quickly, sometimes resolving through negotiated agreements or short hearings, while contested matters may take several months or longer to reach resolution. Factors that influence timing include the number of interested parties, the volume of evidence, and whether alternative dispute resolution is pursued. Early preparation and clear documentation often shorten the process by addressing potential objections before filings are made. When mediation or settlement discussions occur, those steps can either speed resolution or extend the timeline if negotiations are prolonged. Prompt service of notice and adherence to procedural requirements also help avoid delays that could otherwise extend the process.
Beneficiaries have the right to object to a proposed modification, and their objections are part of the court’s consideration. If beneficiaries can demonstrate that the requested change is inconsistent with the settlor’s intent or would unfairly prejudice their rights, the court may deny the petition. Effective communication and documented attempts at reaching agreement can reduce the likelihood of objections and may lead to a negotiated settlement that satisfies interested parties. However, if the court is persuaded that the modification is justified based on the record and applicable law, it can approve the change despite objections. The outcome depends on the facts presented, the legal rationale supporting the modification, and the court’s assessment of how the change aligns with the settlor’s intent and statutory standards.
Filing a petition requires the original trust document and any amendments, declarations explaining the requested change, supporting exhibits such as account statements or transfer records, and proof of notice to interested parties. Additional documentation may include wills, beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, and communications relevant to the settlor’s intent. The more complete the supporting file, the stronger the factual record the court will have to evaluate the petition. Depending on the case, declarations from witnesses, appraisals, and other evidence may be necessary to establish intent or ownership of assets. Proper preparation of these documents and attention to procedural requirements for service and filing support a smoother petition process and reduce the risk of delays or technical objections.
Yes, trust modification petitions filed in probate or superior court generally become part of the public record once filed and entered, including associated orders and submitted exhibits. This public nature can be a consideration for families who prefer to keep estate matters private. In some situations, courts may allow redaction of sensitive financial information or the filing of certain documents under seal, but those options are limited and subject to judicial discretion. When privacy is a priority, parties may first explore settlement and cooperative amendment options that avoid court proceedings. If court involvement is necessary, counsel can advise on what information is required for public filing and whether any protective measures are feasible under local court rules to limit disclosure of particularly sensitive materials.
A Trustee generally must act within the powers granted by the trust and under fiduciary duties to beneficiaries. In many cases, Trustees can make administrative decisions and take actions authorized by the trust without court approval. However, when a proposed change would alter beneficiary interests, correct a significant error, or when Trustee authority is in dispute, court approval may be required to provide legal protection and clear authority to proceed. Seeking court approval through a petition can protect a Trustee from later claims that actions exceeded authority. When uncertainty exists about the scope of trustee powers or when beneficiaries contest proposed actions, a petition provides a formal resolution that clarifies the Trustee’s authority and reduces the likelihood of future liability or litigation.
Retirement accounts and beneficiary designations are generally governed by contract and plan rules, which may supersede trust provisions in some contexts. Changes to a trust do not automatically change beneficiary designations on retirement accounts or life insurance policies, so it is important to review and update those instruments directly. Coordination between trust modifications and retirement plan trustees ensures distributions occur as intended and helps avoid conflicts or unintended tax consequences. When retirement accounts were intended to be payable to a trust, a court petition may address whether assets not titled correctly should be treated as trust assets. Proper review of account beneficiary designations and clear instructions regarding retirement plan trusts are essential when modifying related trust terms to achieve coherent outcomes across all planning documents.
Mediation can play an important role in resolving trust modification disputes by allowing parties to discuss options in a structured, confidential setting. It offers a chance to preserve family relationships and reach mutually acceptable solutions without the time and expense of prolonged litigation. Mediated settlements can be tailored to the specific needs of the parties and can later be submitted to the court for approval if a formal order is desirable. Using mediation early in the process can narrow the issues that require court adjudication or even eliminate the need for a hearing altogether. When parties are willing to engage in good faith discussions, mediation often produces more flexible and durable outcomes that align with both legal considerations and family priorities.
A Heggstad petition addresses assets that appear to have been intended for inclusion in a trust but were never formally transferred into the trust’s title. It asks the court to recognize those assets as trust property based on evidence of the settlor’s intent and other supporting facts. This petition resolves ownership questions that can affect trust administration and distributions, particularly when transfer formalities were overlooked or incomplete. When pursuing a trust modification, it is often necessary to consider Heggstad issues concurrently because the court’s determination about asset ownership can determine whether a modification is meaningful or sufficient. Proper documentation demonstrating intent and the circumstances of the asset transfer is essential to support a Heggstad petition and to secure the desired treatment of those assets under the trust.
Costs associated with a trust modification petition vary based on the complexity of the matter, the need for discovery or expert reports, and whether the parties can reach agreement through negotiation or mediation. Uncontested matters that settle quickly are typically less expensive, while contested proceedings with multiple hearings, extensive evidence, or appeals will increase costs. Court filing fees and the cost of serving notice are additional considerations. Discussing budget expectations and possible alternatives early helps clients make informed decisions about the best approach. Considering mediation or settlement options can reduce overall costs, and thorough preparation at the outset often prevents expensive surprises. We provide transparent discussions about likely fees and procedural steps to help clients plan effectively.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas