A Heggstad petition can resolve situations where trust-owned property was never formally retitled into a trust after the trust creator intended that transfer. When real property, bank accounts, or other assets were meant to be held by a living trust but remain in the original owner’s name, a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that the property was effectively part of the trust. This page explains what a Heggstad petition is, why someone might file one in Loomis, and how the process typically unfolds. It also highlights practical steps to protect property and complete estate planning documentation to avoid future complications.
Many families discover gaps between their estate planning documents and the actual title records after a property owner dies or becomes incapacitated. A Heggstad petition is a judicial procedure to establish that the decedent intended the property to be governed by the terms of their trust. This remedy can simplify administration, preserve privacy, and help beneficiaries receive assets without prolonged litigation. On this page we outline the legal standards a court will consider, the documentation commonly used to support a petition, and how a Loomis practice can assist with gathering proof and preparing filings to pursue a timely and effective resolution for trust property disputes.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be a pivotal step when trust administration is stalled by assets that were never properly conveyed into the trust. The primary benefits include restoring the intended distribution plan, minimizing probate exposure, and preserving the privacy that trusts are designed to provide. It can also prevent additional costs and delays that come with alternative estate administration routes. A successful petition confirms title under the trust and helps successor trustees carry out their duties without further legal uncertainty. Timely action and careful documentation increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduce stress for family members.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handle a range of estate planning and trust administration matters for clients in Placer County and throughout California. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust documents, title records, and any contemporaneous evidence that demonstrates the trust creator’s intent. We assist trustees and family members with preparing petitions, supporting declarations, and coordinating with title companies or county recorders when necessary. The goal is to secure court recognition of trust ownership and to move administration forward with minimal disruption and expense. We provide practical guidance on documentation, timelines, and possible outcomes based on local court practices.
A Heggstad petition is a specialized legal filing that asks a probate or superior court to treat certain property as if it had been properly transferred to a trust, based on the intent of the trust maker. The petition typically includes factual declarations, copies of relevant trust instruments, deeds, or account records, and any correspondence or evidence showing the intent to place the asset in trust. Courts review the totality of the evidence, seeking clear indication of intent and whether the asset was meant to be trust property. Understanding the types of evidence and how to present them is a key part of preparing a successful petition.
Timing, jurisdiction, and the specific remedy sought can vary by case. A Heggstad petition may be filed during trust administration or as part of probate proceedings after a death. It can address real estate, bank accounts, and other titled assets. In many situations, presenting recorded deeds, beneficiary designations, trust schedules, and communications with financial institutions strengthens the petition. Working methodically to assemble documentation and anticipate questions from the court helps reduce objections and supports a clear record for the judge to consider when deciding whether to reform title in favor of the trust.
In essence, a Heggstad petition asks the court to acknowledge that certain property should be recognized as trust property despite the absence of a recorded transfer. The petition explains the circumstances that led to the omission, such as clerical oversight or administrative delay, and provides evidence of the trust maker’s intention. When the court is satisfied, it can direct that title be treated as belonging to the trust, allowing the successor trustee to administer the asset according to trust terms. This judicial recognition helps avoid full probate administration and aligns legal title with the decedent’s estate plan.
A persuasive petition includes a clear chronology of events, authenticated copies of the trust instrument, any transfer documents or deeds, and witness declarations describing the trust maker’s intent. Evidence from third parties, such as bank statements showing payments into trust accounts or communications with title companies, can be persuasive. The petition must also explain why informal transfer actions were not formalized and describe any steps taken after the omission was discovered. A carefully drafted petition frames the facts for the court and anticipates potential objections from interested parties to streamline judicial review and resolution.
Estate and trust proceedings involve specialized terms that frequently appear in petitions and court orders. Understanding these terms helps trustees and family members follow the process and compile appropriate documents. This section offers plain-language definitions and practical examples to demystify common phrases such as beneficiary, trustee, conveyance, and reformation of title. Familiarity with these terms can be especially helpful when preparing declarations and supporting exhibits that a court will review during a Heggstad petition proceeding in Placer County.
A trust is a legal arrangement where one person, the trust maker, transfers property to be managed by a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries according to written terms. Trusts can be used to manage assets during life and to distribute property after death while avoiding probate. Trust documents outline the trustee’s duties, beneficiary rights, and distribution instructions. When property intended for a trust is not properly retitled, a Heggstad petition may ask the court to recognize that omission as an informal but effective transfer based on the trust maker’s demonstrated intentions.
A petition is a formal written request submitted to a court asking for a specific legal ruling or order. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the document requests that the court declare certain property to be trust property despite defects in formal title transfer. A petition sets out the factual background, legal basis, and relief sought, and it is often supported by declarations and documentary evidence. The court evaluates the petition and any oppositions before issuing an order that resolves the title issue and guides subsequent administration.
A trustee is the person or institution entrusted with managing trust assets in accordance with the trust document. The trustee has legal authority and fiduciary responsibilities to act in beneficiaries’ best interests and to carry out the terms of the trust. When property is later found to have been omitted from the trust, the trustee may file a Heggstad petition to confirm the trust’s ownership of that property and to permit its administration under trust terms, enabling the trustee to distribute or manage assets as intended by the trust maker.
Reformation of title refers to a court’s order that adjusts legal ownership records to reflect the actual intent and agreements of the parties. In a Heggstad petition, the goal is to reform title or declare that the asset belongs to the trust despite the absence of a recorded transfer. The court considers evidence of intent and surrounding circumstances to determine whether reformation is appropriate. If granted, the order aligns title with the trust and allows trustees to manage and distribute the asset without further dispute.
When trust property has not been formally transferred, interested parties have multiple legal paths to consider, including filing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate for assets left in the decedent’s name, or pursuing contract-based remedies when promises to transfer are documented. Each route has trade-offs related to time, cost, and privacy. Probate may expose family affairs to public record and proceed more slowly, while a petition focuses on correcting title and preserving trust administration. Evaluating these options in light of the estate plan and the specific asset types helps determine the most efficient approach for resolving ownership and distribution matters.
A limited filing may be appropriate when there is straightforward evidence that the property was intended to be trust-owned, such as contemporaneous notes, a draft deed, or clear beneficiary instructions. If the title defect appears to be a clerical omission and all interested parties agree, a focused petition can quickly remedy the issue. This approach helps reduce time and expense compared with full probate or contested litigation. The success of a limited filing depends on gathering reliable supporting materials and presenting a concise explanation of how the omission occurred and why the court should recognize the trust’s ownership.
When beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties are in agreement about the intended ownership of the asset, the court process is often more streamlined. An uncontested petition supported by clear declarations and documentary evidence can lead to a prompt judicial order. This cooperative path minimizes conflict and legal expense while achieving the trust maker’s intended result. Counsel can facilitate communication, prepare the necessary filings, and help ensure that all parties understand the procedure and the impact of the court’s order on subsequent administration of the trust.
A comprehensive approach is often required when property has a complex ownership history, multiple potential claimants, or conflicting documentation. In such situations, additional investigation, title searches, and careful legal analysis are necessary to frame the issues for the court and to mitigate the risk of future disputes. Comprehensive representation may involve depositions, obtaining third-party records, and preparing detailed legal arguments to support the petition. A more thorough process can help secure a durable court order that clarifies title and reduces the likelihood of later challenges.
When beneficiaries or potential heirs disagree about whether property belonged to the trust, or when creditors assert competing claims, a comprehensive strategy is often necessary. Such cases may involve contested hearings where evidentiary rules and legal precedents play a significant role. Preparing a detailed factual record, anticipating opposing arguments, and coordinating with financial institutions or title companies can improve the likelihood of obtaining a court order that withstands appeal or collateral attack. Thorough preparation helps protect the trust’s integrity and supports orderly administration in the long term.
A comprehensive approach to addressing untransferred trust assets can provide clarity, finality, and protection against future disputes. By assembling a full record, addressing potential claimants up front, and seeking orders that resolve related legal questions, trustees and beneficiaries can avoid piecemeal litigation. This thorough preparation also helps ensure title can be cleanly transferred or reformed, allowing trusts to function as intended for asset management and distribution. A careful strategy reduces the risk of surprise objections and supports smoother administration of assets that were intended to belong to the trust.
Beyond resolving the immediate title issue, comprehensive handling often uncovers other estate planning gaps that should be addressed, such as outdated beneficiary designations or missing documents. Taking a holistic view during the petition process allows trustees to recommend updates and implement corrective measures once the court determines ownership. Addressing these related matters at the same time can prevent future problems and streamline the administration process, ensuring the trust’s provisions are carried out in a manner consistent with the trust maker’s intentions.
Pursuing a comprehensive record and judicial resolution can provide the legal certainty that trustees and beneficiaries need to move forward with administration. A well-documented petition supported by clear evidence and thorough legal argumentation makes it less likely that adverse parties will successfully challenge the court’s decision later. This stability benefits beneficiaries who need timely access to assets and trustees who must fulfill fiduciary duties without the prospect of ongoing litigation. Taking the time to address potential weaknesses up front often saves time and expense over the long run.
When a court resolves a Heggstad petition, it often prompts a broader review of estate planning documents and asset titling. This is an opportunity to correct outdated designations, record transfers that were previously overlooked, and ensure that trustee powers and beneficiary lists accurately reflect the trust maker’s current intentions. Addressing these issues concurrently promotes clearer administration and reduces the risk of future oversights. Proactive record-cleaning helps families maintain orderly asset management and reduces administrative burdens for successor trustees.
Begin gathering all relevant documents as soon as a suspected omission is discovered. Useful materials include copies of the trust instrument, any draft deeds, financial records showing intended transfers, mortgage statements, and correspondence with financial institutions or title companies. Affidavits from individuals who observed the trust maker’s intentions can also be helpful. Early collection reduces delays and strengthens a petition’s factual foundation. A well-organized set of documents helps attorneys prepare clear declarations and exhibits for the court, increasing the chance of a prompt and favorable ruling on the petition.
Consider potential objections creditors or interested heirs might raise and address them in the initial petition when possible. Preparing declarations that explain the context for the omission, setting out any corrective steps already taken, and providing evidence of the trust maker’s intent can preempt disputes. If beneficiaries are likely to contest the petition, gather witness statements and documentary proof that demonstrate the trust maker’s consistent actions toward treating the asset as trust property. Anticipating likely challenges helps frame the matter for the court and can reduce the need for extended litigation.
Families and trustees should consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended to be held by a trust remain titled in a deceased or incapacitated person’s name, potentially impeding trust administration. Filing a petition can align legal title with the estate plan, avoid broader probate proceedings, and permit beneficiaries to receive distributions under the trust’s terms. If an omission threatens access to needed funds or complicates the management of property, seeking judicial recognition through a petition can provide a clear pathway to resolve the issue and allow trustees to carry out their responsibilities without unnecessary delay.
Another common reason to consider this service is to protect privacy and reduce public exposure of estate affairs. Probate records are generally public, while trust administration is private. When property was intended for trust ownership but was not formally transferred, a Heggstad petition offers a route to preserve the confidentiality the trust was designed to provide. Additionally, resolving title problems through a petition can prevent competing claims and make it simpler for beneficiaries and trustees to close out the estate or manage ongoing trust assets efficiently and in accordance with the trust maker’s wishes.
Common circumstances include homes or investment properties that were never retitled after trust creation, bank or investment accounts left in the decedent’s name rather than the trust, and retirement plan distributions that were not coordinated with trust provisions. Clerical oversights, failed transfers during a move, or confusion about whether probate was needed can all lead to gaps between estate planning documents and title records. Identifying these circumstances early and pursuing a Heggstad petition when appropriate can restore trust administration and help families avoid probate where the trust maker intended otherwise.
Real property is one of the most frequent subjects of Heggstad petitions when deeds were never recorded in the trust’s name. This can occur due to oversight, timing of a move, or misunderstanding of the steps needed to complete a transfer. Even when a trust document expresses clear intent, the absence of a recorded deed can complicate transfer to heirs or trustees. Filing a Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that the property should be treated as trust-owned, enabling a successor trustee to manage or transfer the property according to the trust’s terms without full probate proceedings.
Accounts intended to be trust assets sometimes remain titled in the individual’s name, whether because of account setup errors or delays in updating titles. This can cause difficulty in accessing funds for trust administration or paying ongoing expenses. A Heggstad petition supported by statements, account records, and the trust document can resolve ownership and allow the trustee to access funds for legitimate trust purposes. The petition process helps align financial institution records with the trust maker’s intentions and avoids the need for a broader probate case to transfer those assets.
Sometimes the paperwork evidencing a transfer is lost, incomplete, or never recorded, leaving uncertainty about asset ownership. This can happen after moves, during estate administration, or when original documents were stored but not updated. In these cases, a Heggstad petition compiles available evidence—drafts, correspondence, witness declarations, and related records—to demonstrate the trust maker’s intent and request judicial recognition. The court’s review can resolve the ambiguity and provide a reliable basis for trustees to carry out the trust’s terms without guessing about rightful ownership.
If you are facing title issues in Loomis or nearby Placer County communities, local counsel can help explain options and prepare necessary petitions. We can help evaluate the evidence needed to support a Heggstad petition, work with trustees and title companies, and prepare declarations and exhibits for filing. The goal is to reach a judicial resolution that acknowledges the trust maker’s intentions and permits the trustee to administer the asset under the trust’s terms. Prompt evaluation helps determine whether a petition is the best path or whether alternative measures are advisable.
Our practice is focused on resolving trust and estate administration matters with attention to detail and a pragmatic problem-solving approach. We work closely with trustees and family members to collect necessary documentation, prepare clear and persuasive filings, and coordinate with title companies or other institutions. Our goal is to secure judicial recognition of trust ownership when appropriate and to guide clients through the court process with clear explanations of likely timelines and outcomes. Practical, thorough preparation helps achieve efficient resolution while protecting beneficiaries’ interests.
We prioritize communication and responsiveness throughout the petition process, helping clients understand required evidence and potential obstacles. By anticipating common issues and organizing a coherent factual record, we aim to reduce pitfalls that might delay resolution. We also help trustees implement corrective steps after a court order is obtained, including recording necessary documents and updating trust records. Our service emphasizes preserving the trust maker’s intent and minimizing administrative burden for heirs and fiduciaries.
In addition to petition preparation, we advise on post-resolution steps to prevent future title issues, such as recording deeds, updating account registrations, and reviewing related estate planning documents. Helping families complete these follow-up tasks preserves privacy, reduces probate risk for future assets, and makes long-term administration simpler for successor trustees. Our practical guidance supports orderly trust management and helps beneficiaries receive distributions in accordance with the trust maker’s wishes.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust document and available records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then assist in collecting supporting evidence, drafting the petition and supporting declarations, and coordinating service to interested parties. Once filed, we monitor court dates, respond to inquiries, and advocate for a clear judicial order recognizing trust ownership. After obtaining relief, we advise on recording documents and completing administrative steps necessary to align asset titles with the court’s order, ensuring the trustee can manage the property according to the trust terms.
The first step is a thorough assessment of available documents and facts. We examine the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that reflects the trust maker’s intent. We identify missing pieces and recommend steps to obtain necessary records, such as title reports or bank documentation. This initial review informs our recommendation on whether a Heggstad petition is advisable and what supporting evidence will be needed. A clear plan at the outset helps streamline the petition drafting and filing process.
Collecting records involves requesting deeds, financial statements, trust drafts, and any communications that point to intended transfers. We verify the authenticity of documents and work with third parties when necessary to secure missing evidence. Witness statements and affidavits can supplement documentary proof when records are incomplete. By assembling a coherent, verified packet of materials, we ensure the petition presents a persuasive factual narrative to the court and reduces the likelihood of procedural delays or requests for additional information.
After compiling records, we evaluate legal strategies and potential risks, including opposing claims, creditor issues, and the possibility of contested hearings. We discuss anticipated timelines and costs so clients can make informed decisions. If alternative remedies may be more appropriate, such as negotiated settlements or probate filings in certain circumstances, we explain trade-offs. This assessment helps set realistic expectations and informs the petition’s scope and supporting arguments, maximizing the prospects for a favorable judicial ruling.
Once the records are in order and the strategy is set, we draft the Heggstad petition, declarations, and exhibits tailored to the local court’s procedures. The filing explicitly sets out the facts, legal basis, and relief sought to treat the asset as trust property. We handle service to interested parties and file proof of service as required. Properly prepared filings reduce the risk of procedural defects and help the judge quickly understand the essential facts and evidence supporting the petition, paving the way for a timely decision.
Drafting the petition and supporting declarations focuses on clarity and completeness. We present a chronological narrative of events, attach relevant documents, and explain why the court should grant the requested relief. The documents anticipate likely questions and address potential conflicts among interested parties. Clear organization of exhibits and concise argumentation helps the court assess the petition efficiently, which can reduce the need for supplemental filings and allow the judge to reach a determination based on the record presented.
After filing, proper service on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is essential. We prepare and file proof of service and respond to any motions or objections that may be filed. If disputes arise, we work to resolve issues through negotiation where possible, but we will also present factual and legal support at hearing. Managing responses promptly and professionally helps maintain momentum in the case and protects the petition’s position in court, allowing the judge to consider the petition on a complete record.
The final stage includes the court hearing and entry of an order recognizing the property as trust-owned. After a hearing, the judge may issue an order that clarifies title and directs record changes. Following a favorable order, we assist with recording any necessary documents, notifying institutions, and updating trust records. These post-order steps are important to ensure that the court’s decision is reflected in title records and that the trustee can proceed with administration, distribution, or sale of the property consistent with the trust’s terms.
At the hearing, we present the assembled record, highlight key evidence of intent, and address any questions from the judge or opposing parties. Clear presentation of facts and supporting exhibits helps the court understand why reformation of title is appropriate. If objections are raised, we offer legal and factual responses grounded in the record. Our objective is to secure an order that aligns legal title with the trust maker’s documented intentions so trustees can manage assets without further uncertainty.
After obtaining a court order, recording the order and any corrected deeds or documents with county recorders and notifying relevant financial institutions ensures that title records reflect the court’s determination. We assist with implementing these administrative steps and advise trustees about follow-up measures, such as updating account registrations and maintaining secure trust records. Completing these tasks helps finalize the transfer and reduces the chance of future disputes or administrative complications for successor trustees and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a judge to recognize that certain property should be treated as part of a trust even though it was never formally transferred into the trust by recorded deed or account title change. The petition explains the reasons for the omission and presents evidence showing the trust maker’s intent to include the property in the trust. Courts consider the totality of circumstances, including trust documents, written or oral communications, and any actions taken by the trust maker that indicate intent to transfer the asset to the trust. Heggstad petitions are used in situations where an omission prevents the trustee from administering or distributing the asset as the trust requires. By securing a judicial declaration, the trustee can manage or distribute the property under the trust terms rather than relying on probate to transfer title. The process helps align legal title with the trust maker’s intentions and often preserves the privacy benefits of trust administration while avoiding the delay and publicity of probate.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition can vary depending on the completeness of the record, whether the petition is contested, and local court schedules. In uncontested matters with clear evidence, the process may be resolved in a few months, including time to gather documentation and comply with filing and service requirements. In contested or complex cases that require extensive discovery or evidentiary hearings, the timeline can extend significantly, sometimes taking much longer depending on court availability and the need for supplemental filings. Preparing the strongest possible supporting record up front can shorten the process. Early coordination with title companies, financial institutions, and potential interested parties often reduces delays. Promptly addressing objections and filing necessary follow-up materials helps keep the matter moving and increases the chances of a timely resolution consistent with the trust maker’s intentions.
Courts evaluate multiple types of evidence when deciding a Heggstad petition, focusing on whether the trust maker intended the asset to be trust property. Documentary evidence such as the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, trust schedules, or draft transfer documents is important. Declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the trust maker’s intent, correspondence showing plans to transfer assets, and records of payments or account activity that align with trust administration are also persuasive. The court examines whether the totality of the evidence demonstrates a consistent intent to treat the asset as part of the trust, taking into account any explanations for why the formal transfer was omitted. Evidence that clarifies timing, demonstrates steps taken toward transfer, or shows the trust maker’s regular practice of using the trust for particular assets can be especially helpful in persuading the court to grant relief.
A Heggstad petition can effectively avoid probate for the asset at issue by obtaining a court order that recognizes the property as trust-owned. When the court grants the petition, title is treated as part of the trust and therefore subject to trust administration rather than probate. This outcome preserves the privacy advantages of trusts and can allow trustees to handle the asset according to the trust terms without opening a separate probate administration for that specific property. However, whether a petition avoids probate for all estate assets depends on the overall titling of property and other estate planning details. Some assets may still require probate if they were not intended to be part of the trust or if there are unresolved creditor claims or competing interests. A petition is a tool to align specific assets with the trust, reducing the scope of probate when appropriately employed.
Typically a successor trustee or another interested party with standing may file a Heggstad petition on behalf of the trust. The trustee has a duty to preserve trust assets and to pursue legal remedies that allow proper administration; filing a petition to correct title is one such remedy. In some circumstances, beneficiaries or heirs may have standing to seek a judicial determination if the trustee is unwilling to act or if the issue affects the distribution of estate property. It is important that the petitioner assemble and present a persuasive factual record showing the trust maker’s intent. Working with counsel to prepare the petition, coordinate service to interested parties, and comply with procedural requirements ensures the petition is properly presented to the court and increases the chance of a favorable resolution for the trust and its beneficiaries.
Common objections to a Heggstad petition include claims that the trust maker did not intend the asset to be part of the trust, assertions of competing ownership, or creditor claims that may impact available assets. Opponents may point to the absence of a recorded deed or inconsistent documentation. Addressing these objections requires a careful factual record demonstrating the trust maker’s consistent intent and explaining why formal transfer steps were not completed. Providing corroborating documentation, such as contemporaneous correspondence, draft deeds, bank records, and witness declarations, helps counter objections. If creditor concerns are raised, it may also be necessary to resolve or address those claims as part of the petition process. Anticipating likely defenses and including factual support in the initial filing reduces the risk that objections will prolong the matter.
A Heggstad petition can affect how creditors pursue claims against specific assets by clarifying whether the property is part of the trust or the personal estate. If the petition establishes that the asset belongs to the trust, creditor claims against the decedent’s probate estate may not attach to that asset depending on the timing and applicable law. However, creditors with valid claims that predate or otherwise reach trust assets may still have remedies, depending on the circumstances. Because creditor rights vary with timing, jurisdiction, and the nature of the asset, addressing potential creditor issues during petition preparation is important. We review possible creditor exposure, include necessary notices, and coordinate with interested parties to limit surprises and ensure the court has the information needed to assess claims relative to trust property.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition depend on the complexity of the case, whether the petition is contested, and the amount of investigation required to gather supporting evidence. Filing fees, fees for obtaining title reports or certified records, and costs associated with service on interested parties are typical. Legal fees vary based on the scope of work, including drafting petitions, preparing declarations, and representing clients at hearings. Simple uncontested matters with straightforward evidence generally cost less than cases requiring extensive discovery or contested hearings. Investing in a thorough initial investigation often reduces unexpected expenses later by avoiding supplemental filings or contested litigation. We provide clear information about anticipated fees and costs after an initial review and offer guidance on cost-effective steps to build the record, such as obtaining specific documents from title companies and financial institutions early in the process.
Title companies can be valuable partners in Heggstad petition matters by providing historical title reports, reconciling recorded interests, and identifying encumbrances that affect proposed transfers. Their records help clarify chain of title and reveal recorded documents that might confirm or contradict claims about ownership. Title companies may also advise on the recording steps that are necessary after a court order and can issue endorsements or clearance letters once a judge’s order has been recorded and any identified defects have been addressed. While title companies do not file the petition, their information and cooperation often strengthen the evidentiary record. Coordinating with title companies early to obtain relevant reports and guidance about post-order recording ensures that the court’s determination can be reflected accurately in county records and that the trustee can clear title for sale or transfer following the order.
After obtaining a favorable Heggstad order, trustees should promptly record any necessary documents with the county recorder to reflect the court’s ruling and to update title. Notifying financial institutions, mortgage holders, and other relevant parties is also important to ensure account registrations and payment records align with the trust’s status. Trustees should retain certified copies of the court order and any recorded documents in the trust file for future reference and administration. Additionally, trustees should review the trust and related estate planning documents for other potential gaps or updates, such as beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives. Taking these corrective steps after the order helps prevent future title issues and facilitates smoother trust administration and distribution in accordance with the trust maker’s intentions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas