A Heggstad petition helps beneficiaries move assets into a trust when a deceased person’s estate paperwork did not transfer title as intended. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, serving Rocklin and Placer County, we help families understand how a Heggstad petition can preserve trust intent and avoid prolonged probate delays. This overview explains how this legal procedure interacts with common estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and certificates of trust. Call 408-528-2827 for a consultation to review whether a Heggstad petition may be an appropriate step in completing an estate plan transition in California.
Families often encounter unexpected obstacles when trust assets are still titled in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition offers a path for beneficiaries or trustees to request the court confirm that ownership interest should be treated as part of the trust. This process complements documents like a general assignment of assets to trust and a certification of trust. In Rocklin, California, the petition can reduce administrative friction and help ensure assets are distributed according to the settlor’s intentions. Learn how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can document facts and present the petition to the appropriate court for resolution.
A Heggstad petition is important because it provides a court-ordered confirmation that certain property is subject to a trust despite remaining in the decedent’s name. This confirmation can be essential to clear title, permit sale or transfer, and avoid clouded ownership that delays distributions. It can preserve the settlor’s intentions and minimize conflict among beneficiaries by making a clear legal finding about property status. The petition can also help trustees carry out duties involving retirement plan trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, and other tailored trust vehicles used in California estate planning.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, based in San Jose and serving Rocklin and surrounding communities in California, assists clients with estate administration matters including Heggstad petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful review of documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and certifications of trust to assemble a clear factual record. We prepare filings that explain the origin of assets, the intent of the trust maker, and how the assets should be treated under trust law. We also assist with related matters like trust modification petitions, Heggstad petitions, and guardianship nominations to support families through transitions.
A Heggstad petition is typically used when property intended to be trust property was never properly retitled or when a title issue arises after the trust maker’s death. The petition asks the court to declare that the property in question belongs to the trust based on the settlor’s intent and available documentation. To succeed, factual evidence such as trust instruments, correspondence, beneficiary statements, and other documentary proof may be needed. The petition is judicially reviewed and, if granted, creates a public record clarifying that the asset is trust property for purposes of administration and distribution.
In California, Heggstad petition proceedings are a recognized remedy to reconcile mismatches between the settlor’s intent and formal title. They are used in situations where real property deeds, bank accounts, or other assets were not completed as part of the trust funding process. The petition can be filed by a trustee or beneficiary and may involve notifying interested parties and attending a court hearing. The goal is to establish a clean path for carrying out the trust’s terms while reducing the risk of future disputes or challenges to the intended distribution of assets.
At its core, a Heggstad petition asks a California court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as part of a trust despite title discrepancies. The petition recounts evidence showing that the settlor intended the item to be trust property, such as draft deeds, funding check records, trust schedules, or trust-related assignments. Courts evaluate intent and supporting documentation when deciding whether to grant the petition. When successful, the order confirms the asset’s status and authorizes the trustee to manage or transfer the asset according to the trust terms, streamlining estate administration and reducing the need for prolonged probate involvement.
A successful Heggstad petition involves careful factual presentation. Key elements include establishing the settlor’s clear intention to include the asset in the trust, identifying the asset and how title differs from the trust documentation, and showing the relationship between the asset and the trust terms. The process typically begins with a review of estate planning documents, collection of supporting evidence, preparation of a petition with declarations and exhibits, service to interested parties, and a court hearing. The goal is to obtain an order confirming trust ownership to clear title and enable administration consistent with the trust.
This glossary highlights common terms encountered in Heggstad petition matters, including terminology related to trusts, property transfer, and court filings. Understanding terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, certification of trust, pour-over will, and general assignment of assets to trust helps families follow the petition process and evaluate the types of evidence courts consider. Familiarity with these concepts improves communication about case facts and expectations. If complex issues arise, an informed review of the documents can identify the best path forward to support a petition or alternative remedies under California law.
A settlor is the person who created the trust and whose intent guides how trust assets should be handled. Understanding the settlor’s intent is central to a Heggstad petition because the petition asks the court to give effect to that intent despite incomplete title transfer. Evidence of intent can come from the trust instrument itself, related documents, or actions taken by the settlor before death. Demonstrating consistent actions and records that show the settlor intended the asset to be trust property is often a key component of the petition process in California.
A certification of trust is a short document that confirms the existence of a trust and identifies the trustee without disclosing the trust’s full terms. It is commonly used to prove to banks, title companies, and third parties that a trust exists and who can act on its behalf. In Heggstad petition matters, a certification of trust may be used as supporting evidence to show the trust’s existence and to clarify who is authorized to bring the petition and administer assets, which assists the court in understanding the governance behind the claimed trust ownership.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets and carry out the terms established by the settlor. In Heggstad petition cases, the trustee may be the party filing the petition to confirm that assets were intended to belong to the trust. The trustee’s duties include gathering information about assets, identifying documentary evidence, and acting in the best interest of beneficiaries. The court evaluates the trustee’s representations and supporting materials when deciding whether to grant the petition and allow the trustee to manage or distribute the asset accordingly.
A pour-over will is a will designed to transfer any assets not already titled to the trust into the trust upon death, acting as a safety net if funding was incomplete. In the context of a Heggstad petition, a pour-over will can be evidence of the settlor’s intent to have assets ultimately controlled by the trust. While the will establishes intent, a Heggstad petition provides a judicial path to confirm that particular assets should be treated as part of the trust for administration and distribution, which can streamline fiduciary processes and reduce uncertainty for beneficiaries.
When property remains incorrectly titled, families can consider a Heggstad petition, probate, or other corrective actions such as corrective deeds or an affidavit of transfer where applicable. A Heggstad petition aims to confirm trust ownership in court and can be faster and more targeted than full probate in many situations. Probate may be required when no effective trust instrument exists or the asset cannot be shown to belong to a trust. Alternative remedies depend on asset type, value, and the available documentation. A tailored review helps determine which path minimizes delay and expense while honoring the settlor’s intent.
A limited Heggstad petition can be sufficient when there is substantial documentary evidence indicating the settlor intended an asset to be part of the trust. Examples include draft deeds, correspondence showing funding intent, bank records of transfers to trust accounts, and a trust schedule listing the asset. If these materials form a coherent narrative that demonstrates intent, a narrow petition focused on the single asset may resolve title issues quickly and with less cost than broader proceedings. This approach can preserve the trust framework without initiating a full probate estate administration.
A focused petition is often appropriate when beneficiaries and potential claimants are in agreement or there are minimal disputes about ownership. In cases where interested parties acknowledge the trust relationship and documentation supports the claim, a single-asset petition can clarify title and allow the trustee to move forward. This approach limits litigation scope and helps avoid extended court involvement. When conflicts are minor and documentation is persuasive, the court may be willing to grant a narrow order that addresses the specific asset without broader estate litigation.
A comprehensive approach becomes necessary if multiple assets have title issues or if the chain of ownership is complex. When several assets require correction, coordinating filings, preparing multiple declarations, and addressing potential competing claims demands a broader strategy. This approach ensures consistent documentation across items, mitigates the chance of piecemeal rulings that create further disputes, and helps manage communication with financial institutions and title companies to clear records efficiently and uniformly for trust administration.
If beneficiaries disagree about whether an asset belonged to the trust or if adverse claims are anticipated, a comprehensive legal strategy can protect trustee decision-making and manage litigation risk. This may involve preparing more extensive evidentiary materials, addressing claims through declaratory relief, and possibly coordinating related petitions such as trust modification or Heggstad petitions across assets. A broad approach helps create a consistent record that courts can rely on to resolve contested matters and clarify asset disposition for fair administration.
A comprehensive approach to addressing trust funding and title issues can reduce the risk of future litigation and ensure consistent treatment across multiple assets. By assembling robust documentary support, preparing complete disclosures, and coordinating filings, beneficiaries and trustees can achieve clear court orders that facilitate distribution and minimize bureaucracy. The result is a cleaner administrative record, fewer delays in transferring property, and improved ability for the trustee to manage or sell assets as needed under the trust terms. This approach supports efficient closure of the estate pathways.
Beyond litigation risk reduction, a coordinated strategy improves communication with financial institutions, title companies, and county recorders tasked with implementing transfers. Having consistent court orders and documentation streamlines interactions when clearing title, updating account ownership, or completing corrective deeds. This reduces administrative back-and-forth and can lower overall cost by avoiding repeated filings. A comprehensive approach can also incorporate related planning documents such as a certification of trust, pour-over will, and assignments to ensure all parts of the plan operate together.
A big advantage of a comprehensive petition strategy is the ability to clear title for all affected assets at once, rather than dealing with each on a case-by-case basis. This unified approach can remove clouds on property, enable sales or transfers more quickly, and provide beneficiaries with the certainty needed to proceed with estate settlement. By preparing consistent petitions and supporting evidence, trustees can secure orders that make records clear for banks and county offices, easing the administrative burden that often slows distribution of assets after a trust maker’s passing.
Comprehensive handling of trust funding issues reduces long-term administrative burden by resolving uncertainties up front. Accurate and complete court orders help trustees avoid repeated inquiries from title companies and reduce the likelihood of later disputes that can reopen matters. Consolidating evidence, coordinating filings, and clarifying ownership through the court assists trustees in focusing on final distribution and preservation of estate value. Clearing impediments early supports timely management and protects beneficiaries from drawn-out administrative hurdles.
Start by assembling the trust instrument, any schedules, draft deeds, bank records, and correspondence that indicate intent to fund the trust. Having a clear collection of documents makes it easier to show the court the pattern of intent and the connection between the asset and the trust. Include trust certifications, assignments, and any relevant emails or notes that reflect the settlor’s actions. A comprehensive file supports a focused petition and reduces the need for follow-up requests for proof, saving time and clarifying facts for all interested parties.
When preparing the petition, craft a concise factual narrative that ties the asset to the trust through documents and actions taken by the settlor. Include dates, transfers, and statements that show intent to fund the trust. Supporting declarations and exhibits should be organized to permit a court to follow the sequence of events and to understand why the order is necessary. A clear presentation reduces ambiguity and increases the likelihood of obtaining an order that clarifies title and supports efficient trust administration.
Families should consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain in the decedent’s name and are blocking the administration or distribution process. This action can prevent unnecessary probate steps and reduce delay when transferring real property, bank accounts, or other titled assets. The petition can also resolve title issues that hinder the sale of real estate or the transfer of accounts into the trust name. When documentation supports the claim that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust, filing a petition is often the most direct path to restore the trust’s intended control.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to protect beneficiaries from disputes that arise from unclear title. A court order confirming that assets belong to the trust gives trustees greater authority to manage property and reduces the risk that third parties will refuse to accept trust authority. This step can be particularly helpful when dealing with institutions that require a court order to change title or release assets, allowing the trustee to access assets consistent with the trust terms and to finalize distributions more efficiently.
Heggstad petitions commonly arise after death when a settlor failed to complete funding steps, such as executing a deed transferring real property into the trust or re-titling bank and brokerage accounts. They also occur when paperwork was prepared but not recorded, or when assets were inadvertently left in the decedent’s name. Other circumstances include unclear advisory records for retirement plan trusts, mismatched beneficiary designations, and cases where a pour-over will indicates intent but the trust funding was incomplete. These situations create the need for court clarification to proceed with trust administration.
A typical circumstance is a deed that was prepared but not recorded before a settlor’s death, leaving real property titled in the decedent’s name. This can prevent the trustee from selling or transferring the property according to trust terms. A Heggstad petition can present the court with the deed drafts, trust provisions, and other evidence that demonstrate the intent to hold the property in trust. Securing a court order allows the trustee to clear title and proceed with sale, transfer, or management as required by the trust.
Accounts that were never retitled into the trust can create obstacles to distribution and management. Financial institutions sometimes require a court order to permit transfer or to recognize a trustee’s authority. A Heggstad petition can document the settlor’s intent through bank statements, funding checks, and related records to secure an order that clarifies the account’s status. With such an order, trustees can update account ownership and access funds needed to pay expenses and distribute assets according to the trust.
Conflicting or incomplete documentation may lead to uncertainty about whether an asset should be treated as part of the trust. Situations where multiple documents point in different directions require careful assembly of evidence to show the court a consistent intent. A Heggstad petition allows presentation of the full factual record, including any corrective assignments or trust schedules, to reconcile discrepancies. A clear judicial determination helps prevent later challenges and enables the trustee to act with confidence when distributing or managing the asset.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides assistance with Heggstad petitions for clients in Rocklin and throughout Placer County. We work to gather the evidentiary materials needed to support a petition, communicate with interested parties, and prepare clear filings for court. Our team guides trustees and beneficiaries through procedural requirements and helps coordinate follow-up actions with title companies and financial institutions. If assets remain in the decedent’s name or documentation is unclear, we can evaluate the situation and recommend the most efficient path to achieve a judicial confirmation of trust ownership.
Choosing a law office familiar with California trust and estate procedures helps ensure filings are thorough and persuasive. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman combines knowledge of estate planning documents with practical experience preparing court petitions, gathering declarations, and coordinating with county recorders and title companies. We focus on building a clear factual narrative and presenting documents in a way that helps judges quickly understand the intent behind asset treatment, which can result in timely orders that remove title clouds and facilitate trust administration.
Our approach includes reviewing the trust instrument, pour-over will, certification of trust, and any assignments or records relevant to the contested assets. We assist trustees with procedural tasks such as serving notices to interested parties and preparing exhibits that document the history of asset handling. By addressing both the factual presentation and the practical follow-through, we help trustees obtain the court actions needed to transfer or manage assets smoothly under the trust’s terms and reduce administrative delays for beneficiaries.
We also help clients explore alternatives where appropriate, such as corrective deeds or limited nonjudicial transfers when permitted. When the facts indicate that a judicial declaration is the clearest route, we prepare a petition that lays out the necessary evidence and recommended outcome. Our goal is to achieve a practical resolution that honors the settlor’s intentions and enables efficient administration, whether through a narrow petition or a more comprehensive strategy tailored to the estate’s needs.
Our process begins with a thorough document review to identify the trust instrument, related records, and any evidence that ties the asset to the trust. We then advise on whether a targeted Heggstad petition, broader filings, or alternative steps are appropriate. If a petition is pursued, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, serve required parties, and represent the filing through the court hearing. We coordinate with banks and title companies after an order is obtained to implement transfers or clear title for the trustee to act in accordance with the trust terms.
The initial step focuses on gathering trust documents, drafts of deeds, account records, and any communications that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. This evidence is organized to create a timeline showing how and when the settlor intended assets to be part of the trust. We interview trustees and beneficiaries to obtain background facts and locate witnesses who can confirm actions taken by the settlor. A careful fact gathering stage sets the foundation for a persuasive petition and reduces the chance of surprises during court proceedings.
Collecting records involves obtaining the executed trust document, any schedules, bank statements, escrow or title documents, and draft or signed deeds. We look for documentary signs that the settlor intended to transfer the asset to the trust, such as transfers of funds, retitling steps in progress, or explicit trust schedules. Properly labeled and organized exhibits help the court understand the linkage between the trust and the asset in dispute and support the narrative that the asset should be treated as trust property.
We speak with trustees, beneficiaries, and others who had conversations or dealings with the settlor in order to gather testimony supporting the petition. Witness statements can corroborate documentary evidence and provide context about the settlor’s intentions. These interviews may surface additional documents or clarify timeline issues. Prepared declarations from knowledgeable parties become part of the petition package and help the court evaluate the totality of evidence when determining whether to grant an order recognizing the asset as trust property.
Once the factual record is assembled, we draft a petition that outlines the facts, attaches supporting exhibits, and requests judicial recognition that the asset is trust property. The package includes a proposed order and declarations from witnesses and trustees. We ensure that required notices and service to interested parties comply with California procedures. Properly prepared filings reduce procedural risk and help the court see the straightforward basis for the requested relief, which can accelerate issuance of a judgment clarifying title.
Drafting declarations requires precise statements of fact that reference documentary exhibits. Declarations recount the settlor’s actions, the asset’s history, and the connection to the trust terms. Exhibits are organized and labeled so the court can easily locate crucial documents. This stage also anticipates potential questions and includes exhibits that address them, such as copies of draft deeds, bank records, and trust schedules. A clear evidentiary presentation supports the petition and provides a predictable record for the court to review.
After filing, we serve required notices to interested parties and ensure compliance with California service rules. We file proof of service so the court has a complete record. Depending on local practice, hearings may be scheduled and the court will review the filings in advance of the hearing. Preparing timely responses to any objections and coordinating with counsel for other parties helps the process move forward. Proper administrative follow-through increases the possibility of a clear and enforceable order.
If the court grants the petition, we obtain a formal order declaring the asset to be trust property. That order becomes the basis for rectifying title, instructing financial institutions, or recording corrective documents. We assist the trustee with presenting the order to banks, title companies, and county recorders to implement transfers or clear title. This implementation stage is key to converting judicial relief into practical outcome, enabling the trustee to manage, sell, or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms with minimal further delay.
Following a favorable order, we coordinate with title companies and county recorders to record any necessary corrective deeds or documents that reflect the court’s finding. This ensures that public records match the trust’s ownership of property. Working with title professionals helps confirm that there are no remaining encumbrances or administrative issues preventing clear transfer. Proper recording solidifies the practical effect of the court order and enables trustees to manage and distribute real property assets according to the trust.
When the order affects bank or brokerage accounts, we present the court order to institutions to change account ownership, release funds, or permit transfers. Some institutions may have internal procedures for recognizing trust orders, and we assist in completing required paperwork and communicating the judicial finding. Clear instructions backed by the court order help trustees gain access to funds to pay estate expenses or distribute assets to beneficiaries as directed by the trust, ensuring that account transfers are completed efficiently and in compliance with institutional policies.
A Heggstad petition is a court action in California used to request a judicial declaration that particular property should be treated as part of a trust despite being titled differently. The petition sets out facts demonstrating the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust, often supported by documents such as trust instruments, draft deeds, bank records, or correspondence that show a clear pattern of funding the trust. The court reviews the evidence and may enter an order confirming the asset as trust property so that the trustee can manage or distribute it accordingly. This mechanism is commonly used when a settlor died before completing funding steps or when records are inconsistent, leaving title in the decedent’s name. The petition provides a focused remedy to eliminate title clouds and enable trust administration without pursuing a full probate if the facts support the claim. The court may require notices to interested parties and hold a hearing, and the trustee or a beneficiary can initiate the filing depending on the situation.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies with case complexity, the court’s calendar, and whether interested parties raise objections. Simple, uncontested petitions with clear documentary support can sometimes be resolved within a few months from filing to order. More complex matters that involve multiple assets, disputed facts, or objections may take longer. Local court procedures and processing times can also influence scheduling, so cases in different counties may proceed at different paces. Preparing a thorough petition and serving required parties promptly helps avoid delays. Gathering complete documentation and organizing declarations in advance can shorten the time to hearing. After an order is issued, additional administrative steps such as recording corrective deeds and coordinating with financial institutions will follow and contribute to the total time needed to implement the court’s decision and complete the trust administration.
A Heggstad petition is supported by evidence that demonstrates the settlor’s intention to include the asset in the trust. Typical evidence includes the trust document, certification of trust, draft or executed deeds, bank or brokerage records showing transfers or funding attempts, trust schedules, assignments of assets to the trust, and communications that reflect the settlor’s plans. Declarations from the trustee or witnesses who recall the settlor’s statements or actions are often included to corroborate documentary proof. Organizing these materials into a clear timeline and factual narrative is essential. The court looks for a coherent presentation that ties the asset to the trust and explains why title does not match that intent. The more direct and consistent the evidence, the more likely the petition will be accepted and result in an order clarifying that the property is trust property for administration purposes.
Yes, a beneficiary may file a Heggstad petition if a trustee fails to act, although the ability to do so depends on circumstances and local procedures. When trustees decline to pursue necessary court actions or when delays harm beneficiaries’ interests, a beneficiary can seek judicial relief to confirm that an asset is part of the trust. Before filing, beneficiaries should document attempts to resolve the issue and understand that court filings may require notice to all interested parties and can prompt responses or objections. Filing as a beneficiary typically involves assembling evidence comparable to what a trustee would present and explaining why court intervention is necessary. Beneficiaries should be prepared to demonstrate standing and to follow service rules. In contested situations, filing can prompt discussions that lead to negotiated resolutions, but the court stands ready to make a binding determination if parties cannot agree.
A Heggstad petition can reduce the need for probate for assets that are shown to belong to a trust, but whether it avoids probate entirely depends on the estate’s overall structure and the types of assets involved. If most assets are properly included in a trust and a Heggstad petition clarifies specific items, probate may be unnecessary or substantially reduced. However, assets outside the trust or those with unresolved issues may still require probate proceedings to administer or distribute under a will. The petition is a targeted remedy to bring particular assets into the trust framework. When combined with other estate planning documents such as a pour-over will and assignments to trust, it can lead to more streamlined administration and less reliance on probate for items meant to be handled by the trust.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the facts, the volume of evidence, local filing fees, and whether the matter is contested. Expenses include court filing fees, costs for obtaining records, title or escrow charges, and attorney fees associated with preparing the petition, declarations, and exhibits. Uncontested petitions typically cost less than contested matters that require contested hearings and briefing. Transparent budgeting and clear communication about likely costs help families make informed decisions about proceeding. When preparing a budget, consider downstream expenses such as recording corrective deeds, paying county recording fees, and the administrative time required to implement a court order with financial institutions. A preliminary document review can provide a clearer estimate of likely steps and associated costs for the particular assets at issue, helping clients weigh the benefits against expense.
A Heggstad petition typically addresses property that can be judicially declared to belong to a trust, but it does not automatically change beneficiary designations on retirement accounts such as IRAs or employer plans. Retirement accounts are governed by plan rules and beneficiary designations completed with plan administrators. If a retirement account is intended to pass to a trust under the plan’s beneficiary designation, the trustee may need to coordinate with the plan administrator to effect the change and ensure the plan’s terms align with the trust. If the retirement account’s designation does not reflect the settlor’s intent, other steps may be required. The petition might be part of a larger effort to align assets with the trust, but trustee coordination with plan administrators and possible additional legal steps will be necessary to reconcile beneficiary designations with the trust’s terms and the settlor’s overall plan.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider their objections alongside the supporting evidence and may hold a contested hearing. Objections often raise questions about the strength of the documentary proof, the identity of the trust beneficiaries, or competing claims to assets. The court will weigh the declarations, exhibits, and legal arguments presented by both sides and rule based on the preponderance of evidence and applicable legal standards for recognizing trust property. To address objections effectively, petitioners should anticipate possible challenges by gathering robust supporting documents, arranging witness declarations, and preparing legal arguments that clarify intent and chain of events. Resolving objections may involve negotiation, supplemental filings, or a hearing where the judge decides whether to grant or deny the requested relief, or whether additional remedies are warranted.
A Heggstad petition can be used to correct deeds where real property intended for a trust was not properly retitled prior to the settlor’s death. When deed drafts, transfer attempts, or other evidence show the settlor intended the property to be trust-owned, a court order can confirm that status and allow trustees to record corrective deeds consistent with the order. Courts examine the documentation and intent to determine whether the petition is appropriate for clearing title and enabling the property transfer or sale according to trust terms. After the court issues an order, trustees typically work with title companies and county recorders to ensure the public records reflect the trust’s ownership. Recording corrective deeds based on a judicial declaration assists in securing marketable title and removes barriers to sale or transfer that could otherwise delay distribution to beneficiaries or the trustee’s management of the property.
To begin a Heggstad petition process, start by collecting the trust instrument, certification of trust, any draft or executed deeds, account statements, trust schedules, and communications that show the settlor’s intent. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to arrange a review of these documents and an evaluation of whether a petition or alternate remedy is the best path forward. Early document gathering and a clear factual timeline facilitate a quicker assessment and more precise next steps. During an initial consultation, we will discuss likely procedures, potential timelines, and anticipated costs based on the facts of your case. If a petition is recommended, we will outline the documents to assemble, the parties to notify, and the evidence needed for a persuasive filing. This preparation helps ensure the petition is thorough and increases the likelihood of an efficient court resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas