If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Rocklin, a trust modification petition may be the right path to update terms, correct errors, or address changed circumstances. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides practical estate planning assistance to residents throughout Placer County and greater California, including guidance on when a petition to modify a trust is appropriate and what local courts typically require. This overview explains the petition process, what documentation you should gather, and how we help clients evaluate options to preserve their intentions while complying with state law and court procedure.
Trust modification petitions can arise from a wide variety of situations, including changes in property ownership, beneficiary needs, or desire to clarify trustee powers. In Rocklin and elsewhere in California, these petitions must be grounded in clear legal bases such as mistake, changed circumstances, or protective measures to administer the trust effectively. Our approach focuses on reviewing the trust instrument, preparing persuasive pleadings, and helping clients weigh informal resolutions against formal court petitions. We aim to provide steady guidance so clients understand timelines, potential outcomes, and the steps involved in bringing a modification matter before the court.
Filing a petition to modify a trust can provide essential clarity and legal authority in situations where the original document no longer reflects current facts or intentions. Whether the goal is to correct an error, accommodate a beneficiary’s changed needs, or address property that was later acquired, a properly prepared petition helps protect family relationships and preserve the trust’s core purposes. The process also creates a clear public record of the court-authorized change, which can reduce future disputes and ease administration for trustees, beneficiaries, and successor fiduciaries navigating complex asset and household transitions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across Rocklin, Placer County, and the larger California area with a focus on estate planning matters including trust modifications. Our team draws on many years of practice in probate and trust administration to assess whether a petition is needed, prepare the necessary pleadings, and represent clients at hearings if required. We prioritize clear communication, realistic planning, and thoughtful negotiation to resolve disputes when possible while protecting our clients’ goals. Our office also offers practical document preparation such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related estate planning instruments.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the appropriate probate court asking for a change in the terms or administration of a trust. In California, petitions can be based on a variety of legal grounds, including mutual mistake, unforeseen circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose, or the need to add clarification for administration. The petition must describe the requested modification, explain the factual and legal basis, and typically serve notice to interested parties so they may respond. Understanding when a court petition is necessary versus when a nonjudicial amendment might suffice is a key part of deciding how to proceed.
When preparing a petition, it is important to gather supporting evidence such as the original trust instrument, relevant correspondence, deeds, beneficiary statements, and any documents that reflect the settlor’s intentions. Courts will evaluate whether the requested change serves the trust’s purpose and whether it is consistent with the settlor’s probable intent. Parties should be prepared for timelines that include waiting periods for responses, potential hearings, and, depending on the complexity, negotiations or mediation. Working with counsel helps ensure the petition is properly framed to address legal standards and present facts clearly to the court.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to change, clarify, or correct aspects of a trust document so that it can be administered effectively in light of current conditions. Modifications may correct drafting errors, accommodate substantial changes in beneficiaries’ needs, address tax or creditor considerations, or reflect changes in property ownership. The petition must include a clear statement of the desired change and a supporting legal theory that justifies the court’s intervention. By securing court approval, parties obtain enforceable orders that guide trustees and provide certainty to beneficiaries about their rights and obligations under the trust.
A typical petition includes an explanation of the parties involved, a clear description of the trust provision at issue, and the proposed modification language or relief requested. Supporting declarations provide the factual basis, and exhibits such as the trust document and related records are attached. Once filed, the petition must be served on interested persons and creditors according to statutory notice rules. There may be a period for objections, and if disputes arise, the court may schedule a hearing. The judge will evaluate the petition against statutory standards and the settlor’s intent before issuing an order.
Understanding common terms helps make the petition process less intimidating. Important concepts include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, decree, modification, reformation, and fiduciary duty. Being familiar with these words clarifies who must be notified, who has standing to object, and what relief the court may grant. The glossary below defines several frequently encountered terms and explains how they relate to trust modification petitions so clients can better follow pleadings, declarations, and court orders. Clear definitions support informed decision making during every stage of a petition case.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor, is the person who created the trust and established its terms. In a petition context, the settlor’s intent and actions at the time the trust was created are central to the court’s assessment of whether a modification is appropriate. Evidence of the settlor’s intent can include drafts, correspondence, and testimony from those familiar with the settlor’s objectives. When the settlor is alive, their present wishes may be considered; when deceased, the historical record and surrounding circumstances help the court determine the settlor’s probable intentions and whether a change aligns with those purposes.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered correction of a trust’s language to reflect the settlor’s actual intent when a mistake or error in drafting occurred. A petition for reformation asks the court to rewrite the document to fix ambiguity or a drafting mistake that frustrates the settlor’s intention. Reformation is not a tool to change substantive policy choices made by the settlor, but rather to align the written terms with what the settlor intended. Supporting evidence such as prior drafts, handwritten notes, and witness testimony can be important in persuading the court that reformation is warranted.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees owe fiduciary duties such as loyalty, prudence, and impartiality, which guide their decisions about distributions and trust management. A petition may seek changes to trustee powers or request removal or substitution of a trustee when a conflict or inability to act is present. Clarifying or modifying trustee responsibilities in a court order can reduce future disagreements and provide trustees with clear authority to administer assets in accordance with the trust’s objectives.
Interested persons typically include the settlor (if alive), trustees, beneficiaries, and sometimes heirs or potential creditors. Proper notice to interested persons is a statutory requirement and ensures those affected by a petition have the opportunity to respond or object. Notice may be provided by mail or other permitted means, and proof of service is usually filed with the court. Failure to provide adequate notice can delay proceedings or affect the validity of a resulting order, so careful attention to notice rules is essential when preparing and filing a petition in California courts.
When a trust no longer serves its intended purpose, there are several paths to consider including informal amendment where permitted, negotiation or mediation between parties, and filing a formal petition in probate court. Informal approaches may be faster and less costly when all parties agree, but they rely on full cooperation and clear authority under the trust instrument. Mediation can resolve disputes while preserving relationships, but it requires willing participation. A court petition provides a binding resolution when consensus cannot be reached and ensures compliance with legal standards and procedural protections for all interested persons.
If the settlor or all beneficiaries and trustees are in full agreement about a change and the trust instrument allows nonjudicial amendments, a simple written amendment or restatement can often accomplish the update without court involvement. This path reduces expense and avoids public filings, and it can be completed more quickly when everyone cooperates. It is important to ensure that the trust’s terms permit such an amendment and that the modification is documented correctly to prevent future disputes, with careful attention to signatures, witnesses, and any notarization requirements specified in the trust.
For minor clarifications or non-substantive corrections that do not change the trust’s essential allocation of benefits, parties may be able to adopt an agreed-upon clarification that explains the intended meaning. Such clarifications should be documented in writing and ideally reflected in an amended trust instrument to avoid misunderstandings down the line. Even when the change seems small, it is important to include supporting documentation that shows consensus among trustees and beneficiaries and to confirm the amendment process complies with the trust’s own amendment clause.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about the meaning of provisions, allocation of assets, or trustee conduct, filing a petition in probate court becomes necessary to secure a binding resolution. Disputes can involve contested interpretations, allegations of mistake, or conflicts over distribution decisions. A court process allows all interested persons to present evidence, and the judge issues an enforceable order that sets the legal framework for administration. Courts are also equipped to manage contested discovery, hearings, and any necessary remedies to resolve disagreements.
Significant changes such as the sale or acquisition of major assets, beneficiary incapacity, or changed tax law implications may require a formal petition to adapt the trust to current needs. Court approval can provide legal authority for trustee actions that might otherwise be questioned, and it creates a clear record that the modifications were authorized. In some situations, statutory procedures must be followed to protect creditors or other interested parties, and a formal petition ensures compliance with those obligations while seeking relief that aligns with the trust’s purposes.
A comprehensive approach that proceeds through the court system provides a formal, enforceable resolution that can prevent future controversy and clarify trustee authority. This process is particularly valuable when parties are not in agreement or when the modification touches on significant assets, complex beneficiary needs, or potential creditor claims. By documenting the basis for the change and obtaining an order, trustees gain the legal support they need to administer the trust with confidence, and beneficiaries receive certainty about entitlement and distribution procedures.
Court-ordered modifications also create a public record that can be relied upon by financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties who may otherwise hesitate to accept modified documents. That clarity reduces friction in transactions involving trust property and helps protect the trustee from later challenges. In addition, a comprehensive process allows the court to weigh competing interests, balance equitable considerations, and, where necessary, issue tailored remedies that reconcile the settlor’s intent with current realities and legal requirements.
Receiving a court order approving a modification provides legal certainty that can be relied upon by all parties involved in trust administration. This enforceable determination reduces the likelihood of future litigation by addressing objections through a formal judicial process. Trustees gain clear authority to act in accordance with the modified terms, which helps streamline decisions about distribution, investment, and property management. Beneficiaries benefit from predictable outcomes and a documented resolution that protects their interests while aligning with the settlor’s intent as interpreted by the court.
A court-sanctioned modification shields trustees from later claims that their actions were unauthorized and gives beneficiaries assurance that changes were made under judicial review. This protective framework is especially important where large estates, contested distributions, or complex family dynamics are involved. A judicial determination can also address competing creditor or creditor-related concerns and incorporate conditions or safeguards requested by the court. Ultimately, the formal process promotes accountability and reduces risk for all parties responsible for administering or receiving trust property.
Start by assembling all relevant documents such as the original trust, amendments, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Having a complete file helps clarify whether a court petition is necessary, what grounds should be asserted, and which parties must be notified. Timely document review can reveal whether nonjudicial amendment is possible or whether a petition for reformation or modification is the prudent course. Organized records also make it easier to draft persuasive declarations and to identify witnesses who can corroborate the settlor’s intent or explain changed circumstances.
A trust modification petition can take weeks or months depending on court calendars, complexity of issues, and whether objections are filed. Parties should plan for timelines that include notice periods, possible discovery, and hearing preparation. While informal solutions can be less costly, contested petitions may involve attorney time, filing fees, and preparation of evidence. Understanding these factors up front helps set realistic expectations and supports better decision making about whether to pursue negotiation, mediation, or a court petition to achieve the desired outcome while balancing costs and urgency.
People pursue trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting errors, addressing changed family circumstances, or resolving conflicts about trustee authority. A petition can formalize necessary updates when nonjudicial amendments are not available or when parties cannot reach agreement. It can also be used to add clarifying language that prevents future disputes or to realign the trust’s terms with tax planning needs or shifts in asset portfolios. Deciding to seek a judicial modification often reflects the desire for finality and legal authority to administer the trust in line with current realities.
Another common impetus is a change in beneficiary circumstances such as disability, financial hardship, or a beneficiary predeceasing the settlor. Petitioning the court can permit thoughtful adjustments tailored to new needs while preserving the settlor’s overarching goals. Additionally, when trustees face uncertainty about their power to act or potential liability, obtaining a court order can provide the legal authorization needed to manage property and make distributions without fear of subsequent challenge. A petition can therefore be both a corrective and preventative tool in trust administration.
Common circumstances include discovery of drafting mistakes, changes in marital status or beneficiaries’ financial situations, property transfers that were not anticipated, and emerging creditor claims. Petitions are also common when trustees need clarification on ambiguous provisions or when changing tax laws create unintended consequences for trust administration. Deaths, incapacities, and relocations of beneficiaries or trustees can make court guidance prudent to properly interpret the trust and ensure distributions are made in accordance with the settlor’s reasonable intentions and applicable law.
When the trust document contains a clear drafting mistake, ambiguity, or omission that leads to unintended outcomes, a petition for reformation or clarification can correct the record. Such mistakes might include incorrect beneficiary descriptions, improper property schedules, or language that conflicts with other trust provisions. Gathering drafts, emails, or other evidence that show the settlor’s original intent supports a petition, and the court may reform the document to align the written words with what was intended when the error is demonstrated by convincing evidence.
Shifts in beneficiary needs—such as sudden health issues, disabilities, or increased financial dependency—may justify a modification so that distributions better meet real-world situations. A petition can ask the court to adjust distribution standards, change timing, or add protections for beneficiaries with special needs. Such requests must be framed to demonstrate why the modification is consistent with the trust’s purpose and how it will serve the best interests of the beneficiaries while respecting the settlor’s overarching goals.
When trustees cannot fulfill their duties due to incapacity, conflict of interest, or other obstacles, a petition can address removal or substitution and clarify successor trustee powers. Administrative concerns such as outdated trustee instructions, restricted powers that impede management of investments, or uncertainty about authority to sell or transfer property often prompt petitions. Court involvement can grant the necessary authority, formalize roles, and reduce the risk of later disputes by establishing a clear framework for trustees to manage the trust effectively.
Our office provides hands-on support to Rocklin residents pursuing trust modifications, offering tailored guidance from the initial review through resolution. We assist with drafting petitions, preparing supporting declarations and exhibits, and coordinating proper notice to interested persons. When disputes arise, we represent clients at hearings and strive to resolve matters efficiently while protecting the trust’s purpose. Clients appreciate having a central resource to navigate court rules, local practices, and the specific timing considerations that apply in Placer County, so they can move forward with confidence.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has a focused practice in estate planning and trust administration, including handling petitions to modify trusts for clients in Rocklin and across California. We take a practical approach to assessing whether a petition is necessary, exploring alternatives where appropriate, and preparing court filings that clearly present the legal and factual basis for relief. Our goal is to provide steady representation that balances efficient resolution with careful protection of our clients’ objectives in both contested and uncontested matters.
We help clients by conducting a thorough document review, identifying the most persuasive legal grounds for modification, and preparing declarations and exhibits that support the petition. Our office provides guidance on notice requirements, timelines, and possible outcomes so clients can make informed decisions at each stage. When hearings are required, we present evidence and argument aimed at securing clear, enforceable orders that allow trustees and beneficiaries to proceed with confidence in trust administration and distribution.
In addition to litigation support, we assist with related estate planning tasks such as drafting revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives that often accompany trust matters. By offering a comprehensive view of estate planning needs, our office helps clients create aligned documents that reduce the risk of future disputes and ensure a coherent plan for managing assets, care, and legacy goals over time.
Our process begins with an in-depth review of the trust and related documents to determine the best course of action, whether that is negotiation, an agreed amendment, or a court petition. We then prepare a petition that sets out the factual basis and legal grounds for modification and assemble supporting declarations and exhibits. We coordinate service and notice to interested persons, manage responses, and represent clients at hearings if needed. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines, likely outcomes, and options for alternative dispute resolution when appropriate.
During the initial stage we evaluate the trust document, any amendments, and related records to identify the relevant legal issues and practical options. This includes assessing whether a nonjudicial amendment is possible, whether a petition for reformation is warranted, or whether other remedies such as clarification or trustee substitution are necessary. We discuss goals with the client, analyze likely court responses, and develop a strategy that considers timing, notice obligations, and the potential for settlement to minimize conflict and expense.
We collect all relevant documents and potential witness statements that establish background and demonstrate the need for modification. This may include prior drafts, correspondence, financial records, and declarations from individuals familiar with the settlor’s intent. Assembling a strong evidentiary foundation helps clarify the factual narrative and supports persuasive pleadings. Early identification of the key issues and potential obstacles allows us to tailor the petition to the court’s expectations and anticipate arguments that may arise from interested parties.
We determine who qualifies as an interested person under California law and the method required for giving notice. Properly identifying and notifying beneficiaries, trustees, heirs, and potential creditors is essential for a valid petition. We prepare and manage the service process, ensuring affidavits of service and other proof are timely filed with the court. Taking care with notice requirements reduces the risk of procedural challenges and helps keep the case moving forward without unnecessary delay.
Once documents and evidence are organized, we draft and file the petition with the probate court and ensure all procedural prerequisites are met. The filing triggers statutory response periods for interested persons, during which objections or responses may be filed. If objections arise, we evaluate the issues and pursue negotiation, mediation, or litigation as appropriate. Our goal is to resolve disputes efficiently when possible, while preparing for hearings and presenting a focused case that addresses the court’s standards for granting modification or reformation.
When objections are raised, we engage in negotiation or facilitate mediation to explore settlement options that meet the reasonable needs of parties while honoring the trust’s intent. Many disputes can be resolved through structured discussion, which preserves relationships and reduces time and cost. If settlement is feasible, we document the agreed changes and, if necessary, submit a stipulated order to the court. When settlement is not possible, we prepare to present evidence and argument at a contested hearing.
If a hearing is required, we organize declarations, exhibits, and witness testimony to present a coherent and persuasive case to the judge. This preparation includes anticipating opposing arguments, preparing rebuttal evidence, and ensuring all procedural matters are addressed. We aim for clear presentation that focuses the court’s attention on the legal bases and factual support for the requested modification. Thorough preparation increases the likelihood that the court will grant an order that reflects the settlor’s intent and provides necessary authority to trustees.
After the court rules on a petition, we assist with implementing the order, including updating trust documents, advising trustees on how to carry out the terms, and coordinating necessary record changes with financial institutions and title companies. We ensure any required filings are completed and provide guidance on how to document distributions and administrative actions under the modified trust. If additional steps such as further petitions or compliance reporting are required, we continue to support clients through the remainder of the administration process.
When a modification is approved, we help prepare updated trust documents that reflect the court’s order and advise trustees on distributing assets in accordance with the modified provisions. We also provide templates and language for communications to beneficiaries, instructions for title transfers, and assistance with bank and broker documentation. Clear recordkeeping and adherence to the court’s directives minimize the risk of future disputes and help trustees demonstrate compliance with the order.
Following implementation, our office remains available to advise trustees and beneficiaries about ongoing administration, tax considerations, and any further legal steps that may be necessary. We help trustees manage distributions, handle creditor matters if they arise, and advise on asset management within the framework of the modified trust. This continuity of support ensures the trust continues to function as intended and that all parties understand their duties and rights under the new terms.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court asking the judge to change, clarify, or correct terms of an existing trust. Petitions are used when the trust instrument is ambiguous, contains a drafting mistake, or when changed circumstances make the original terms impracticable. The petition outlines the factual basis for the requested change, includes relevant documents and declarations, and explains the legal grounds that justify judicial intervention. The court evaluates the petition and may grant an order that becomes part of the trust’s governing authority. A petition is typically needed when parties cannot reach an agreement through nonjudicial amendment or negotiation, or when the trust’s amendment provisions do not permit the desired change. It is also a prudent course when trustees need clear judicial authority to act and want to avoid future liability. Because the petition process involves notice to interested persons and a judicial determination, it provides a binding resolution that clarifies parties’ rights and duties under the modified trust.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Placer County varies depending on the court’s calendar, the complexity of factual issues, and whether objections are filed. A straightforward, uncontested petition where notice periods pass without objection may be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a matter of weeks to a few months. However, contested petitions that involve discovery, multiple hearings, or complex evidentiary matters can extend over several months or longer. Seasonal court backlogs and the need for supplemental filings can also affect timing. Parties should anticipate mandatory notice periods and potential waiting times for hearings, and they should plan accordingly. Preparing a thorough petition with complete documentation and clear legal arguments can shorten the process by minimizing requests for continuances and by helping the court efficiently evaluate the matter. Our office advises clients on realistic timelines and strives to move matters forward steadily while preserving their legal options.
Yes, beneficiaries are among the primary interested persons who may object to a proposed trust modification. California law requires that interested persons receive notice of the petition so they have an opportunity to file objections and present their side to the court. Objections can challenge the factual basis for the modification, argue that the change is inconsistent with the settlor’s intent, or raise procedural issues such as improper notice. When objections are filed, the court will consider them in determining whether to grant the petition. If beneficiaries object, the dispute may be resolved through negotiation, mediation, or a contested hearing. Mediation can be an effective alternative to litigation when parties are willing to participate, but when disagreements persist, the court will evaluate the evidence and make a binding determination. Preparing strong factual support and addressing likely objections in advance can improve the chance of a favorable outcome.
Evidence for a petition seeking reformation of a trust typically includes documents and testimony that demonstrate the settlor’s intended terms at the time the trust was created. This can include earlier drafts of the trust, handwritten notes, attorney correspondence, contemporaneous letters, or witness declarations describing conversations with the settlor. The goal is to show that a drafting mistake or omission occurred and that reformation will align the trust’s language with the settlor’s actual intent. Courts also consider objective evidence such as documents reflecting the settlor’s property ownership, beneficiary relationships, or subsequent conduct that indicates intent. Presenting a clear factual narrative supported by contemporaneous records increases the likelihood the court will find reformation appropriate. Because the standard is fact-sensitive, careful evidence collection before filing is essential.
Yes, there are alternatives to filing a formal petition. If the trust instrument allows a nonjudicial amendment and all interested parties agree, an amendment or restatement can often be executed without court involvement. Negotiation or mediation among trustees and beneficiaries is another common alternative that can resolve disputes, preserve relationships, and reduce costs. These methods work well when parties are cooperative and the needed changes are not barred by the trust’s amendment clause. However, when parties cannot agree, when the trust does not permit nonjudicial changes, or when clarity and enforceability are required, a court petition is the appropriate avenue. Choosing the best route depends on the specifics of the trust, the parties’ willingness to cooperate, and the need for a binding judicial determination to protect trustees and beneficiaries.
Yes, court orders and filings associated with a trust modification petition generally become part of the public record unless sealed by court order. The petition, supporting declarations, exhibits, and any order signed by the judge are accessible through the court’s filing system. Because these materials can contain sensitive information about assets and family relationships, clients should be mindful of privacy concerns and discuss protective measures with counsel if appropriate. In limited circumstances, parties may request that certain documents be filed under seal or that sensitive details be redacted, but sealing is not guaranteed and requires compelling justification. Where privacy is a priority, exploring nonjudicial resolutions or carefully structuring filings may reduce public disclosure of personal financial details while still achieving needed relief.
Yes, a petition can include requests to remove, replace, or appoint a successor trustee when there is a valid reason such as incapacity, conflict of interest, or failure to perform duties. The court can evaluate allegations and, if warranted, issue an order removing and substituting trustees or adjusting trustee powers. Such remedies are focused on ensuring proper administration of the trust and protecting beneficiary interests while following legal standards for trustee removal. When seeking trustee changes, it helps to present clear evidence of the reasons for removal and a proposed successor who is willing and able to carry out trustee responsibilities. Courts will consider the trust’s terms, the impact on beneficiaries, and whether removal is in the best interest of trust administration before granting relief.
Notice and service for trust modification petitions must comply with California probate rules and statutory requirements. Interested persons such as beneficiaries, trustees, and sometimes heirs and creditors must be identified and provided with proper notice of the petition. Methods of service may include personal delivery, mail, or other statutorily permitted means, and proof of service is typically filed with the court to document compliance. Failing to provide adequate notice can lead to procedural delays or affect the validity of the order. Because notice rules are precise, it is important to identify all potentially interested parties early and ensure they receive timely and correct notice. Our office assists with preparing service documents, tracking returns, and handling any challenges related to notice to maintain the integrity of the petition process.
Costs associated with a trust modification petition can vary substantially based on complexity, the number of interested persons, and whether the matter is contested. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs of serving notices, fees for obtaining records such as deeds, and attorney time for drafting pleadings, preparing evidence, and representing clients at hearings. Uncontested matters tend to be less expensive, while contested cases with discovery and multiple hearings increase overall costs. Planning for these costs up front helps clients make informed decisions about whether to pursue negotiation, mediation, or a formal petition. Our office provides candid guidance on expected expenses and works to manage costs through efficient preparation and strategic decision making focused on resolving issues in a timely manner.
A trust modification may affect related estate planning documents, especially when the trust is part of a broader plan that includes a pour-over will, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives. When trust terms change, it is important to review those complementary documents to ensure consistency and avoid conflicts. For example, a pour-over will that transfers assets to the trust should remain aligned with the trust’s beneficiaries and distribution provisions to avoid unintended results at probate. We recommend a comprehensive review of all estate planning documents after any trust modification to confirm that powers of attorney, healthcare directives, beneficiary designations, and retirement plan trusts remain coordinated with the modified trust. This helps ensure that all instruments operate together to reflect the client’s current wishes and practical needs.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas