A Heggstad petition is a legal action used to treat assets that were intended to belong to a trust as trust property after the settlor’s death. For people in Aguanga and throughout Riverside County, this remedy can help avoid full probate when a deceased person’s assets were not properly retitled despite the existence of a revocable living trust. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists families with clear guidance on whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, what evidence is needed to show intent, and how the court process works. This overview explains the petition’s purpose, likely outcomes, and common scenarios that lead families to pursue it.
Many families discover after a loved one’s death that some accounts, deeds, or other assets remain in the decedent’s name. When those assets were meant to be part of a trust, a Heggstad petition can request a court declaration that the assets are trust property. This can streamline administration and preserve the settlor’s plan. The process typically involves gathering documentation such as trust instruments, beneficiary designations, statements showing funding intent, and testimony about the deceased person’s actions. Understanding the mechanics and timeframe helps families plan next steps and reduce delays in distributing assets to intended beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition can be decisive when the settlor intended assets to be held by a trust but those assets were left in individual names at death. The primary benefit is the potential to treat assets as trust property without lengthy probate proceedings, allowing trustees to distribute or manage property according to the trust terms. It also protects beneficiaries’ interests by clarifying ownership and reducing disputes over title. In many cases, a favorable ruling removes administrative burdens, lowers costs, and speeds up access to funds or property that family members rely on for financial stability and ongoing care.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with focused help in estate planning and trust administration matters. We guide families through Heggstad petitions by carefully evaluating trust documents and other proof of intent, preparing persuasive filings, and representing clients in court when needed. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical strategies to minimize confrontation, and attention to the details that courts expect when assessing whether an asset should be treated as trust property. Clients receive candid assessments about likely outcomes and timelines so they can make informed decisions.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize property as belonging to a trust despite being titled in the decedent’s individual name. To succeed, the petitioner must demonstrate by admissible evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be transferred to the trust. Evidence can include the trust document, beneficiary designations, account applications, correspondence, and testimony about the settlor’s statements or actions. The court evaluates the totality of that evidence to decide whether constructive or equitable relief is appropriate. This petition is rooted in case law and is tailored to situations where simple notices or affidavits are insufficient to effect the transfer.
The Heggstad process typically begins with an investigation to assemble clear records showing intent to fund the trust. Once filings are prepared, the petition is served to interested parties and the matter proceeds through calendared hearings unless settled informally. Outcomes can include a judicial declaration that the asset belongs to the trust, directives for transfer, or a ruling that probate is required. The timeline varies with asset complexity, title issues, and whether objections arise. Early case assessment and careful document collection improve the chance of a favorable resolution and reduce the risk of contested litigation.
A Heggstad petition is a specialized petition in California probate court seeking a declaration that specific property should be treated as trust property. It is used when the trust clearly exists and the decedent intended certain assets to be included, but title was never transferred. The theory behind the petition is equitable: courts may declare that property belongs to the trust based on the settlor’s manifested intent and supporting evidence. This remedy can spare beneficiaries from the time and expense of full probate administration when straightforward documentary proof and testimony show funding was intended.
When evaluating a Heggstad petition, courts focus on several elements: the existence and terms of the trust instrument, evidence that the settlor intended the particular asset to be in the trust, and acts or documentation showing steps toward funding. Courts also consider whether the transfer would prejudice creditors or interested parties and whether other legal remedies are adequate. The process typically involves document review, declaration testimony, and legal briefing. Proper presentation of objective evidence — such as account paperwork, a complementary will, or corroborating witness statements — strengthens a petitioner’s position.
This glossary clarifies technical terms commonly used in Heggstad petitions and trust administration. Clear definitions make it easier to understand filings, evidence expectations, and judicial determinations. Whether reviewing trust instruments, property titles, or probate pleadings, familiarity with these words will help families and trustees make informed decisions and follow the court process with greater confidence. The entries below explain relevant concepts in plain language and connect each term to typical situations that arise in funding disputes.
Trust funding refers to the act of transferring assets into the name of a trust so that those assets are governed by the trust terms upon the settlor’s incapacity or death. Funding can involve retitling bank accounts, changing deed ownership of real estate, and updating beneficiary designations. A Heggstad petition addresses situations where funding was intended but did not occur before death. Courts look for evidence that the settlor took steps to fund the trust or otherwise manifested an intent to include the asset, such as completed forms, instructions to financial institutions, or related documents that indicate a funding plan was in place.
A constructive trust is an equitable remedy the court may impose to correct an unjust result where property is held improperly by someone who should not retain it. In Heggstad matters, a court may deem property to be held in constructive trust on behalf of the declared trust if evidence shows the decedent intended that property to belong to the trust. The remedy aims to honor the settlor’s intentions and prevent unjust enrichment. It is not an actual trust instrument but a judicial declaration used to effectuate the settlor’s plan when formal funding steps were not completed.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement created during a person’s lifetime to hold assets for management and distribution. The settlor typically retains control while alive and can amend or revoke the trust. The trust names trustees and beneficiaries and often avoids probate for properly funded assets. When assets intended for a revocable living trust are left in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition may be used to align title with the trust terms. The trust document itself provides the roadmap for how assets should be handled and distributed after death.
A judicial declaration that property is trust property is the typical remedy sought in a Heggstad petition. Such a declaration instructs courts and third parties that specific assets are governed by the trust rather than by probate distribution. The declaration can direct title changes or provide the trustee with authority to manage and distribute the asset according to the trust. Achieving such a declaration requires persuasive evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust and that recognizing the trust interest is consistent with legal and equitable principles.
When an asset remains in an individual name, families must choose between pursuing a Heggstad petition or administering the asset through probate. A Heggstad petition aims to recognize the asset as trust property, which can bypass full probate and follow the trust terms. Probate administration may be necessary when evidence of intent is lacking or when title issues cannot be resolved equitably. The best option depends on the strength of documentation, the number of affected assets, and whether interested parties will object. Early assessment helps identify the most efficient, cost-conscious path for resolving ownership and honoring the decedent’s plan.
A limited approach such as filing a Heggstad petition is often sufficient when there is clear documentary evidence showing the settlor intended a particular asset to be held by the trust. Examples include completed account transfer forms, overlapping beneficiary designations, or written instructions to a financial institution. When such documents exist and corroborating testimony is available, a petition can narrowly target the affected asset and achieve a judicial declaration without engaging in full probate. This narrower process can save time and reduce expense for beneficiaries seeking access to trust-controlled property.
A limited approach can also work when only a small number of assets were left in the decedent’s name and the interested parties either support the trust’s terms or do not object to treating the asset as trust property. In such cases, the petition process can resolve title for those specific items while leaving the rest of the estate matters to standard administration. Cooperation among heirs and beneficiaries often leads to swifter resolution and less contentious proceedings, enabling the trustee to act without the delay and expense associated with prolonged litigation.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when there are multiple mis-titled assets, complex property interests, or disputes among heirs that could affect many elements of the estate plan. Handling these matters requires coordinated review of deeds, account records, beneficiary designations, and tax implications. In such situations, a broader strategy may combine Heggstad petitions for specific assets, trust administration steps, and related probate filings to ensure all issues are addressed and that transfers are legally effective. This coordinated method helps manage risk and clarifies ownership across the estate.
Comprehensive representation is also warranted when disputes arise over the trust’s validity, the settlor’s intent, or potential creditor claims that might affect asset distribution. When parties contest ownership or when creditors assert rights, careful litigation planning and defensive pleadings are often required to protect the trust and beneficiaries. A full-service approach ensures that litigation, settlement discussions, and title correction measures proceed in a coordinated way, reducing the chance of unexpected rulings that could undermine the settlor’s plan or leave assets tied up in litigation.
A comprehensive approach offers a complete assessment of the estate’s legal landscape, identifying mis-titled assets, potential challenges, and procedural steps to accomplish the settlor’s goals. By addressing title defects, beneficiary issues, creditor exposure, and tax considerations together, families reduce the risk of piecemeal litigation and conflicting outcomes. Coordinated action often leads to more predictable timelines for distribution and may reduce overall costs by avoiding repeated court filings or protracted disputes. Trustees and beneficiaries benefit from a single plan that resolves multiple concerns.
When legal counsel handles all related matters, trustees can focus on fulfilling fiduciary duties rather than managing procedural details. This centralized management helps ensure court filings are timely and that declarations, transfers, and notices are consistent. Families are better positioned to negotiate settlements, clarify rights, and preserve estate assets for their intended recipients. Protection of the settlor’s plan and the ability to move efficiently through administrative tasks are important outcomes that a comprehensive legal strategy seeks to deliver.
By addressing funding gaps, title issues, and potential disputes proactively, a comprehensive approach can shorten the time needed to resolve ownership and distribution questions. Early identification and correction of problems reduce the need for repeated hearings or additional filings, which can add expense and frustrating delays. Families often find that an integrated plan reduces cumulative costs compared with handling each problem in isolation. The goal is to create a clear, defensible record that allows trustees to act confidently and efficiently for beneficiaries’ benefit.
A coordinated legal strategy produces a well-documented case that can help resolve disputes through negotiation or by presenting persuasive evidence at hearing. When petitions are supported by thorough records, declarations, and legal analysis, trustees and heirs are more likely to reach agreement or obtain a favorable court ruling. This stronger position protects family relationships and reduces the emotional toll of contested proceedings. Clear advocacy also helps ensure that the settlor’s written plan is implemented in a manner consistent with California law and equitable principles.
Begin by locating the original trust document, any amendments, account statements, deeds, and paperwork showing attempted transfers. These documents form the backbone of a Heggstad petition and can demonstrate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Early collection reduces delays and helps identify gaps that may require additional evidence such as bank correspondence or witness declarations. Keeping a clear organized file also helps counsel to prepare persuasive court papers and to advise beneficiaries about realistic timelines and potential outcomes.
Delaying action can complicate matters if property titles change, creditors emerge, or other parties assert competing claims. Prompt filing of a petition or other corrective measure helps secure a clear path for trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust. Taking timely steps also preserves key evidence and reduces the risk that documents will be lost or witnesses become unavailable. Early consultation with counsel helps clarify which records to obtain and the most efficient procedural path to resolve funding defects.
Families typically consider a Heggstad petition when a trust exists and the decedent clearly intended certain assets to be included but failed to retitle them before death. This remedy helps align asset ownership with the settlor’s plan without subjecting those assets to full probate. It is particularly useful when the evidence of intent is strong and when beneficiaries wish to avoid the delay and cost associated with probate administration. Evaluating whether a petition will be effective requires careful review of documents and circumstances surrounding the attempted funding.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to provide trustees with authority to manage or distribute an asset promptly when financial needs arise, such as paying bills or maintaining property. When assets remain in individual names, banks and title companies may refuse to recognize trust authority. A judicial declaration resolves uncertainty and empowers trustees to act. Families facing urgent matters or tight timelines often find that a focused legal filing offers a practical path to protect assets and preserve the settlor’s intentions for beneficiaries.
Typical circumstances include real estate deeded in the decedent’s name despite trust language, bank or brokerage accounts never retitled to the trust, or retirement accounts and life insurance where beneficiary designations conflict with the trust plan. Additionally, asset transfers initiated but not completed before death and administrative oversights can create the need for a petition. In each scenario, the core issue is demonstrating that the settlor intended the trust to control the asset. Resolving these matters quickly prevents disputes and helps trustees carry out the trust’s terms.
A frequent issue arises when a decedent owned real property but never executed a deed transferring the property to the trust. Even if the trust instrument references the property, title on record remains in the individual’s name. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare the property is trust property based on the settlor’s intent and supporting evidence. Resolving real estate title through this petition avoids a separate probate action for that asset and allows trustees to manage or distribute the property under the trust provisions.
Financial accounts are commonly overlooked during trust funding. When bank or investment accounts remain titled to the deceased person, institutions may refuse to honor trustee authority. A Heggstad petition supported by account applications, transfer forms, and trustee declarations can persuade a court to recognize those accounts as trust assets. Securing that recognition enables the trustee to access funds needed for estate administration, mortgage payments, or creditor obligations while avoiding the delays of probate administration for those assets.
Sometimes beneficiary designations on retirement plans or life insurance conflict with the trust’s distribution scheme. When designations were intended to reflect the trust but paperwork was incomplete or inconsistent, a Heggstad petition can address ownership questions in light of the settlor’s intent. Courts review the trust document, beneficiary forms, and any evidence of the settlor’s instructions. Resolving designation conflicts through a focused petition helps align asset distribution with the overall estate plan and provides clarity for trustees and beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers help to residents of Aguanga and neighboring communities who face trust funding and title problems. We evaluate trust instruments and related documents, advise on evidence required for a Heggstad petition, and assist with court filings or negotiations with institutions. Our goal is to secure a path that honors the settlor’s plan while minimizing delays for beneficiaries. Local knowledge of Riverside County procedures helps clients proceed with confidence when resolving mis-titled property and estate administration questions.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for clear guidance on trust funding problems, practical solutions tailored to family circumstances, and careful preparation of court filings. We review trust documents and supporting evidence to determine whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed and recommend the most efficient path forward. Communication is timely, and we prioritize explaining options in plain terms so trustees and beneficiaries can make informed decisions about pursuing declarations or related actions in court.
When litigation is required or when banks and title companies need convincing documentation, our approach emphasizes thoroughness in evidence gathering and clarity in legal argument. We work to present a compelling record to the court and to opposing parties, aiming to resolve disputes without unnecessary delay. At the same time, we prepare to advocate effectively in hearings when settlement is not possible. This balanced approach helps protect family interests and supports efficient administration of trust property.
We also help trustees comply with fiduciary duties by advising on interim management of assets, handling notices and conservatorship or guardianship matters if needed, and coordinating with financial institutions to carry out transfers after a ruling. Our team assists with related estate planning tasks such as preparing or updating a pour-over will, certifications of trust, and other documents to prevent future funding gaps. This holistic service helps families move forward with clarity and stability.
At the outset we conduct a detailed review of trust instruments, deeds, account records, and any written or oral statements that show the settlor’s intent. After assembling evidence, we prepare the necessary petitions, declarations, and exhibits for filing with the probate court and serve interested parties. We attempt to resolve matters through documentation and communications with institutions, but are prepared to appear at hearings to present the case when necessary. Throughout, we keep trustees and beneficiaries informed about timelines, potential outcomes, and next steps for enforcing or implementing a court declaration.
The initial phase focuses on locating trust documents, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence or instructions that show the settlor intended to fund the trust. We interview relevant witnesses and gather declarations to corroborate the settlor’s actions. This comprehensive evidence-gathering enables an informed recommendation about whether a Heggstad petition or another remedy is appropriate. Clear documentation maximizes the prospects for a favorable ruling and can simplify communications with banks and title companies.
We examine the trust and any amendments to confirm the settlor’s dispositions and understand how the trust was designed to operate. Attention to details such as successor trustee provisions, distribution instructions, and funding language helps tailor the petition to the assets in question. Understanding the full scope of the trust and related documents informs the strategy for presenting evidence that a particular asset belonged in the trust, and helps identify any issues that may require additional clarification or remedial steps.
We collect account applications, transfer paperwork, emails, and witness statements that corroborate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Sworn declarations from family members, financial advisors, or institution personnel often supplement documentary records. Effective presentation of this combined evidence helps the court understand the factual background and supports a request for a judicial declaration. The goal is to create a coherent narrative showing that the settlor took steps toward funding or expressed clear intent that the asset be part of the trust.
With documents in hand, we prepare a petition tailored to the asset and the evidence available. The filing includes declarations, exhibits, and legal arguments that explain why the court should treat the property as trust property. We ensure that all interested parties are properly notified and that procedural requirements are met. The petition seeks a declaration or an order directing transfer to the trustee, and we outline requested relief in clear terms. Proper preparation increases the likelihood of an efficient resolution.
Pleadings must present facts and supporting documents in a clear, organized manner. We draft declarations that narrate the factual basis for the petition and attach key exhibits such as trust excerpts, account forms, and correspondence. Organizing these materials so that the court can quickly grasp the evidence is essential. Clear pleadings also help opposing parties and institutions evaluate the petition and consider whether to resolve the matter without contested hearings.
After filing, we ensure that all required notices and service are completed in accordance with court rules. Timely service gives interested parties the opportunity to respond, and compliance with procedural deadlines reduces the risk of delay or procedural objections. We monitor response periods and are ready to engage in settlement discussions or proceed to hearing if necessary. Maintaining a disciplined schedule keeps the matter moving forward and helps preserve available remedies for trustees and beneficiaries.
If the matter is contested, we present the case at hearing with declarations, testimony, and legal argument to support a declaration that the asset belongs to the trust. If the petition is unopposed, the court may grant relief based on the submitted papers. After a favorable ruling, we assist with implementing the court order, such as preparing deeds or coordinating with financial institutions to retitle accounts. Our focus is on securing an effective and enforceable outcome that allows trustees to carry out distributions per the trust.
At hearing, we explain the factual record and legal basis for treating property as trust assets. This may involve live testimony, cross-examination, and legal briefing that ties the evidence to governing case law. Clear presentation helps the judge assess whether the settlor’s intent is proven by the available evidence and whether equitable relief is appropriate. Our goal is to secure a declaration that supports efficient administration and protects beneficiaries’ interests in accordance with the trust.
Once the court issues a declaration or order, we coordinate the steps necessary to effectuate title changes and inform institutions of the ruling. This may include preparing deeds, trust certifications, and court-certified orders for banks or title companies. We also advise trustees on interim management responsibilities and help finalize distributions. Ensuring that the court’s decision translates into effective control of the asset is a key closing step that returns property to the trust’s administration and honors the settlor’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks a judge to declare that specific assets belong to an existing trust even though title remained in the decedent’s individual name. It is appropriate when a trust exists and there is evidence that the settlor intended particular property to be part of that trust but formal retitling was not completed before death. The petition seeks an equitable remedy to align title with the settlor’s expressed intentions, thereby facilitating trust administration and avoiding the need to distribute that asset through full probate. Consider a petition when documentary and testimonial evidence indicate the settlor acted to place the asset into the trust or repeatedly stated that the asset was to be governed by the trust. If evidence is weak or if multiple complex claims exist against the estate, probate may be required. Early assessment of records and witness statements helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the better path to honor the trust and secure the asset for beneficiaries.
The timeframe for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, the complexity of title issues, and whether interested parties object. In uncontested situations supported by clear documentation, the court may resolve the matter on submitted papers or at a short hearing within a matter of months. When objections arise or when additional discovery is necessary, the process can extend longer, sometimes taking several months to over a year. Local court congestion and the need for expert testimony can also affect timing. Gathering evidence and preparing a well-organized petition early helps reduce delays. Prompt service on interested parties and proactive settlement efforts can shorten the timeline. Working with counsel who understands Riverside County probate procedures helps ensure filings comply with local rules and moves the matter efficiently toward resolution while protecting trustees’ and beneficiaries’ interests.
Courts will look for objective documentation that supports the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Useful evidence includes the trust instrument and amendments, account transfer forms, deeds, beneficiary designation forms that align with the trust, emails or letters indicating instructions to transfer, and contemporaneous notes. Declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor attempting to fund the trust or who heard the settlor express that intent can also be persuasive when combined with documents. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence rather than relying on a single item. Consistent documentary proof coupled with credible witness testimony strengthens the petition. Conversely, conflicting records or absence of corroboration may lead the court to require probate administration. Careful preparation of exhibits and sworn declarations improves the chance of a favorable determination.
A Heggstad petition can address specific mis-titled assets when evidence shows the settlor intended them to be held by the trust, but it does not automatically avoid probate for all assets. The petition typically targets identified accounts, deeds, or tangible property for which there is enough proof of intent. Assets lacking sufficient supportive evidence or assets subject to claims by creditors or third parties may still require probate administration or other remedial steps. When multiple assets are mis-titled, a series of petitions and coordinated filings may be possible, but each asset requires its own evidentiary showing. Where evidence is extensive and consistent, multiple assets may be resolved together. In other cases, a mixed approach combining petitions for some assets and limited probate for others may be the most practical path forward.
Banks and title companies generally respond to clear court orders and certified declarations that property belongs to a trust. A Heggstad petition resulting in a judicial declaration provides strong authoritative documentation that institutions accept when retitling accounts or transferring ownership. The court’s order typically carries the weight needed to persuade third parties to recognize the trustee’s authority and update records accordingly. However, some institutions may request certified copies of trust documents, additional affidavits, or further paperwork to comply with internal policies. Counsel can coordinate with institutions after a ruling to ensure required forms are completed and to confirm any remaining institution-specific steps, ensuring the court decision translates into practical title corrections and account access for the trustee.
Filing a Heggstad petition offers a path to avoid probate for specific assets, but it carries risks if evidence is insufficient or if objections arise. A failed petition may result in the need to open probate anyway and could increase legal expense. Conversely, probate can be time-consuming and public, but it provides a well-established procedural framework for distributing all assets. Choosing the wrong path can lead to duplicative work or contested litigation that could have been avoided with a different approach. Assessing the strength of documentary and testimonial evidence is essential before deciding whether to pursue a petition. Counsel can evaluate the likely outcomes, estimate cost and timing differences, and recommend a tailored strategy that balances the desire to avoid probate with the practical realities of litigation and institutional cooperation.
Interested parties such as heirs and beneficiaries typically must be given notice of a Heggstad petition so they have the opportunity to respond or object. Proper service and notice are required by court rules to ensure that all persons with a legal interest in the property are informed. Failure to serve required parties can lead to procedural challenges and delay the court’s ability to issue a binding declaration. In some situations, parties may sign stipulations agreeing to the relief sought, which can streamline the process. When all interested parties cooperate, the petition may be resolved more quickly and with lower cost. When disputes exist, the court will adjudicate competing claims after considering the evidence and any objections presented.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include opening probate to administer mis-titled assets, pursuing informal resolution with financial institutions and title companies when documentation suffices, or negotiating settlements among interested parties. In some cases, corrective deeds or beneficiary designation updates initiated before death would have been effective, but after death those remedies are typically unavailable. When parties are cooperative, administrative transfers relying on affidavits and certifications of trust may be sufficient without court involvement. If litigation is undesirable, mediation or settlement negotiations can sometimes resolve title disputes without a contested hearing. Counsel can evaluate each alternative’s viability given the strength of evidence, likelihood of objection, and the estate’s broader circumstances, and recommend the option that best preserves the settlor’s intentions with minimal disruption.
Costs vary depending on the complexity of the title issues, the amount of evidence to gather, and whether interested parties contest the petition. An uncontested petition supported by clear documentation may require fewer billable hours and lower overall fees, while contested matters with hearings, discovery, and trial preparation involve greater expense. Additional costs can include filing fees, fees for obtaining certified records, and possible costs for deposition or expert testimony if unusual valuation or title issues arise. Counsel can provide an initial assessment and estimate based on the facts of the case and the likely procedural path. In many matters, early evidence gathering and focused negotiation reduce overall costs. Clear communication about fee structure, anticipated tasks, and alternative approaches helps families make cost-conscious decisions while pursuing effective remedies.
To prevent funding problems, ensure key assets are retitled into the trust during life or that beneficiary designations are consistent with the trust. Periodic reviews of asset ownership, beneficiary forms, and deeds help catch changes that could create future mis-titling. Maintain a central file with copies of the trust, certifications of trust, deeds, account paperwork, and any transfer instructions, and review these documents after major life events such as marriage, divorce, or property purchases. Communicate clearly with financial institutions and real property title companies to confirm transfers are complete, and consider obtaining a certification of trust that institutions will accept in lieu of full trust copies. Working with counsel to periodically review and update estate plan documents minimizes the risk of assets being left out of the trust when a settlor dies.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas