A Heggstad petition is a legal request to a California court asking recognition that property intended for a living trust was effectively transferred despite title remaining in an individual name. For families and trustees in Cabazon, understanding this petition can help avoid unnecessary probate and clarify trust administration for real estate and other assets. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients in gathering the necessary documentation, preparing statements of intent, and presenting evidence that demonstrates the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. This process protects beneficiaries and preserves the settlor’s wishes.
Many people establish a revocable living trust to manage assets and sidestep probate, but sometimes deeds or account title changes are overlooked. A Heggstad petition provides a pathway to correct the record by demonstrating the intent to transfer and showing that the trust was funded in substance. In Cabazon and Riverside County, community members face specific property and local court practices; addressing these matters early reduces delays. Our firm helps collect supporting affidavits, trust documents, and correspondence that show the settlor’s plan, and prepares a clear petition tailored to local court expectations to pursue recognition of the trust transfer.
A Heggstad petition matters because it can substantively confirm that assets were intended to be part of a living trust even when formal title transfers were missed. Without this judicial recognition, beneficiaries may face probate proceedings, added expense, and delays in asset distribution. Filing a well-supported petition helps maintain continuity of management, protect beneficiaries’ interests, and preserve privacy by avoiding a full probate case. It also assists trustees in exercising their authority with clarity, allowing them to address mortgages, sales, or transfers of property in line with the settlor’s documented plan and the trust’s terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has a long history of assisting California families with estate planning and trust administration matters. Our approach focuses on understanding client goals, explaining legal options in clear terms, and preparing thorough documentation for filings such as Heggstad petitions. We represent clients across Riverside County and beyond, helping to gather deeds, trust instruments, witness statements, and related records needed to show intent and benefit trust administration. We take practical steps to streamline the process and communicate with courts and third parties to support the orderly transfer or confirmation of assets into trusts.
A Heggstad petition asks a court to declare that title to certain property is effectively held by a trust because the settlor intended the transfer despite a failure to re-title the asset. This remedy arises from case law and is commonly used for real property, bank accounts, and other titled assets. The petition typically reports the settlor’s trust document, the circumstances of the intended transfer, and supporting evidence such as declarations, deeds, or statements from those with knowledge. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence to determine if the property should be treated as trust property for purposes of administration and distribution.
Preparation of a Heggstad petition involves assembling a clear narrative that ties the asset to the trust, supported by documentary proof and affidavits. Courts in Riverside County consider factors like written trust terms, communications about funding the trust, and contemporaneous steps taken to cause the transfer. The process can involve formal filings, service on interested parties, and possibly a hearing. Success often depends on organized presentation of facts that trace the settlor’s intent and actions to place the asset into the trust, and on anticipating and addressing objections from heirs or creditors who may challenge the petition.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial declaration that specific property intended to be part of a trust should be recognized as trust property even though title remains in the settlor’s name. It is used to reconcile situations where the settlor took steps indicating intent to fund the trust but failed to complete formal transfer documents. The petition details the trust instrument, the asset in question, and the evidence showing intent, such as signed documents or consistent actions. When granted, the order allows the trustee to manage and transfer the asset according to the trust’s terms, preventing delay and reducing the need for probate administration.
Successful Heggstad petitions are built on a combination of clear trust documentation, credible testimony, and documentary evidence linking the asset to the trust. Relevant elements include the trust instrument, deeds, transfer documents, related correspondence, and witness declarations that corroborate the settlor’s intent. The petition should present a coherent chronology showing efforts to fund the trust and any reliance on professionals or institutions that delayed formal transfer. The process includes drafting pleadings, serving interested parties, and responding to court inquiries. Thoughtful organization of evidence and a focused legal argument increase the likelihood of a favorable judicial determination.
Understanding common estate planning and trust-related terms helps clients navigate a Heggstad petition. Terms such as revocable living trust, pour-over will, trust funding, and probate are frequently used during the process. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to gather the right documents and describe the history of a missing title transfer. For example, a pour-over will complements a trust by directing residual assets into the trust at death, while a revocable living trust is the document under which a Heggstad petition may assert property ownership. Clear definitions help set expectations for the filing and potential outcomes.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement where a settlor transfers assets into a trust for management during life and distribution at death under the terms of the trust. Because it is revocable, the settlor retains flexibility to amend or revoke it while alive. The trust typically names a successor trustee to manage the assets if the settlor becomes incapacitated or passes away. Funding the trust by retitling assets is a necessary step to avoid probate, and a Heggstad petition may be used when funding was intended but not fully completed, allowing courts to recognize assets as trust property.
A pour-over will complements a trust by directing any assets not formally placed into the trust during the settlor’s lifetime into the trust upon their passing. This ensures that assets intended for trust distribution are ultimately administered under the trust’s terms, though such assets may first be subject to probate. The pour-over will provides a safety net, but it does not replace the benefits of funding the trust during life. In cases where funding steps were incomplete, a Heggstad petition might be used to have specific assets classified as trust property without relying solely on the probate route.
Deeds and trust certifications are documents used to evidence ownership and authority related to trust assets. A deed transfers real property title, while a certification of trust is a concise summary of the trust that trustees can present to third parties without disclosing the full trust terms. When a property remains titled in the settlor’s name, evidence such as a signed but unrecorded deed, beneficiary statements, or bank correspondence can support a Heggstad petition. Courts will evaluate these documents alongside declarations to determine whether the property should be recognized as trust property.
Guardianship and trustee nomination documents designate who will care for minor children or manage trust assets if a parent or settlor becomes incapacitated or dies. These nominations help ensure continuity of care and management according to the settlor’s wishes. In trust administration contexts, clear nominations and successor trustee designations streamline decisions and reduce disputes. When title issues arise and a Heggstad petition is needed, demonstrating that the trust structure is complete and that proper nominations exist supports orderly administration and provides the court with confidence in the trust’s governance framework.
When addressing unrecorded or overlooked transfers to a trust, clients may consider limited corrective actions or pursue a full Heggstad petition. Limited remedies can include directly re-titling assets when all parties agree, or obtaining a corrected deed if the settlor is able. These approaches are quicker when straightforward, but they require cooperation and sometimes re-signing documents. A Heggstad petition is broader and seeks court recognition when unilateral or administrative fixes are impractical or when interested parties dispute ownership. Choosing the right approach depends on the asset, the presence of potential challengers, and the facts surrounding the intended transfer.
A limited approach can be appropriate when all owners and interested parties agree on the intended transfer and can promptly sign corrected deeds or account title change forms. If the settlor is still able to confirm their intent and the transfer simply requires administrative steps, retitling the asset may resolve the matter without going to court. This avoids litigation costs and expedites access for trustees. However, it is important to document the agreement and ensure that any recorded documents properly reflect the trust and its trustee to prevent future disputes and to protect beneficiaries’ interests.
A limited remedy is often sensible when there are no competing heirs, creditors, or adverse claims that might challenge a nonjudicial correction. When title is updated while everyone consents and where no legal objections are foreseeable, a simple transfer can restore trust funding. That said, certain financial institutions or title companies may require additional documentation before accepting transfers, and some assets like retirement accounts have strict beneficiary rules. When uncertainty exists about potential challenges, a court declaration through a Heggstad petition may provide stronger, lasting protection for the trustee and beneficiaries.
Comprehensive legal action, such as filing a Heggstad petition, is often necessary when heirs or other parties dispute ownership or when creditor claims may complicate a straightforward transfer. A court order provides formal recognition of trust ownership and establishes a clear legal basis for trustee actions, reducing the risk that subsequent challenges will undo transactions. Courts consider the available evidence and can issue binding determinations that protect both trustees and beneficiaries, particularly when the settlor’s intent is contested or when documentation is incomplete and requires judicial evaluation.
Certain assets, including properties with complex title histories or accounts held by institutions that resist informal changes, may require a judicial declaration to facilitate transfer. Title companies, lenders, and financial institutions often demand definitive documentation before recognizing a trustee’s authority. A Heggstad petition can produce a court order that these third parties will accept, allowing trustees to clear title, sell property, or manage accounts. When administrative fixes are blocked by procedural or institutional hurdles, seeking a court recognition becomes a practical solution to enforce the settlor’s intent and allow proper trust administration.
Seeking court recognition through a Heggstad petition provides legal certainty, reduces later challenges, and can simplify dealings with financial institutions and title companies. A court order clarifies ownership for taxes, sales, and transfers and gives trustees the authority to administer assets with fewer doubts. This approach also helps protect beneficiaries from delays and potential additional costs that arise from contested title or probate. While pursuing court action requires preparation and time, the resulting clarity often outweighs the initial effort when the asset’s status is uncertain or when disputes are likely.
Another benefit of a comprehensive approach is that it creates a formal record of the court’s findings, which can be used to support future transactions. Trustees gain a recognized legal basis to act, making it easier to sell or refinance property, coordinate with institutions, and carry out the trust’s distribution plan. This protection is especially valuable for high-value or difficult-to-title assets, and it reduces the chance that beneficiaries will face additional legal hurdles during administration. Ultimately, the goal is to preserve the settlor’s intentions and minimize disruption for heirs and successors.
A court order confirming trust ownership provides a level of legal certainty that informal corrections cannot match. This reduces the risk that creditors or disgruntled heirs will later challenge transactions performed by a trustee. By documenting the facts and issuing a binding determination, the court helps ensure that asset management and distribution proceed according to the settlor’s wishes. While litigation has costs and timelines to consider, the clarity and finality offered by a judicial declaration can prevent more expensive disputes down the road and support efficient administration for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
When assets are subject to institutional requirements, a court order often unlocks the ability to complete sales, transfers, refinances, or account changes. Title companies, banks, and other entities are more likely to accept a judicial determination that recognizes trust ownership than informal paperwork. As a result, trustees can carry out transactions without ongoing objections or procedural hurdles. Achieving this recognition supports timely resolutions and protects beneficiaries who depend on the asset values for distribution, caregiving, or other financial needs tied to the trust plan.
Begin collecting all related documents as soon as a missing transfer is identified: trust instruments, deeds, past correspondence with lenders or title companies, and any drafts of transfer documents. Also obtain declarations from individuals who witnessed the settlor’s intent or assisted with trust formation. Clear chronological documentation strengthens the narrative required by a Heggstad petition and helps the court understand the steps taken to fund the trust. Early organization reduces delays and enhances the ability to address questions from the court, institutions, or potential objecting parties.
When the asset is held by a financial institution, title company, or lender, reach out to learn their documentation requirements early in the process. Some institutions accept a certification of trust and recorded deed, while others may insist on a court order. Knowing these requirements guides whether to pursue a simple retitling or a formal petition. Coordinating early helps prevent wasted effort and ensures that any court action taken will satisfy third-party conditions for recognizing the trustee’s authority and allowing transactions to proceed.
A Heggstad petition should be considered when assets intended for a trust remain titled in an individual’s name and simple administrative corrections are not possible or might be disputed. It provides a means to secure court recognition so trustees can act without fear of later challenges. This is particularly important for properties subject to mortgages, assets involving third-party institutions, or situations where heirs disagree about ownership. Filing a petition can preserve the settlor’s goals, expedite administration, and reduce overall costs compared to prolonged disputes or contested probate proceedings.
Another reason to consider this service is to maintain privacy and avoid revealing trust terms in a public probate process. By confirming trust ownership through a Heggstad petition, trustees can often administer assets through trust procedures rather than opening a public probate estate. This can be beneficial for families who prefer confidential handling of distributions and who wish to limit public scrutiny of asset details. The process also supports stable management of assets for beneficiaries who rely on timely access to funds or property for health, care, or household needs.
Typical circumstances include a settlor who created a trust but neglected to record a deed, bank accounts left in personal names, beneficiary designations that were not updated, or transfers delayed due to oversight or miscommunication. Other cases involve properties purchased with trust funds but titled incorrectly due to lender or escrow errors. When such gaps occur, a Heggstad petition provides a path to reconcile the settlor’s intent with the formal title record. Addressing these issues promptly reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings and promotes orderly administration.
A common situation arises when a deed was drafted or signed but never recorded, leaving real property in the settlor’s name even though the trust was meant to own it. This can happen due to timing issues, oversight, or administrative delays. A Heggstad petition presents the facts and evidence to the court showing the settlor’s intent and surrounding circumstances, seeking an order that the property be treated as trust property. This resolves uncertainty for trustees and enables transactions like sales or refinances that rely on clear title.
Clients sometimes prepare a trust but forget to retitle bank or investment accounts, which remain under individual names. Since these accounts are often subject to specific institutional rules, resolving the issue can require either administrative retitling or court recognition. A Heggstad petition documents the trust, the account history, and any instructions given to financial institutions, asking the court to acknowledge the account as part of the trust. Doing so can allow trustees to access funds for management, caregiving, or distribution as the trust directs.
Sometimes property is purchased using trust assets but the deed is mistakenly titled in the settlor’s name or in joint names that conflict with trust plans. These discrepancies create obstacles for trustees who need clear title to manage or distribute the asset. A Heggstad petition lays out the funding trail and evidentiary support that shows the trust’s role in the acquisition, asking the court to recognize the asset as belonging to the trust despite the recorded title. This resolves title uncertainties and supports subsequent transactions in line with the settlor’s intent.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides representation to clients in Cabazon and Riverside County for matters involving trust funding, Heggstad petitions, and related trust disputes. We help clients gather documentation, prepare pleadings, and present a coherent case to local courts. Our focus is on clear communication, timely filings, and practical strategies to get assets recognized as trust property when formal title steps were missed. Clients benefit from hands-on assistance throughout the petition process and careful attention to the evidence that courts typically expect in these matters.
Choosing representation for a Heggstad petition means working with a firm that understands trust documents, local court procedures, and how to present coherent factual narratives. We help identify the most persuasive pieces of evidence, prepare declarations, and explain options for resolving title issues without unnecessary delay. Our team assists in coordinating with title companies, lenders, and trustees to ensure the petition addresses practical hurdles and supports swift administration of trust assets once recognized by the court.
We prioritize clear communication and responsiveness so clients know what to expect at each phase of the petition process. From initial evidence gathering to service on interested parties and court appearances, we manage the procedural steps and work to limit surprises. By preparing organized filings and anticipating common objections, we seek to streamline the process and reduce the stress often associated with disputes over trust funding. Our goal is to help trustees and families secure orderly transitions for trust property in line with the settlor’s wishes.
Clients receive practical guidance on whether a limited administrative correction might suffice or whether court recognition is the prudent path. We explain how different assets and institutional requirements affect the route to resolution and aim to align legal strategy with client priorities, whether that means minimizing cost, preserving confidentiality, or establishing a definitive legal outcome. Throughout, we remain attentive to the needs of beneficiaries and trustees, offering solutions that reduce friction and support efficient trust administration.
Our process begins with a careful intake to identify the asset, review the trust instrument, and collect all supporting documentation. We then prepare the petition and supporting declarations, coordinate service on interested parties, and submit required filings to the appropriate Riverside County court. We remain in contact with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions to address questions and coordinate necessary third-party documentation. If a hearing is scheduled, we prepare a concise presentation of the facts and evidence to support the requested judicial declaration, aiming for a timely and practicable resolution.
The first step focuses on collecting the trust document, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and witness declarations that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. We analyze the chain of events, identify any gaps, and determine the most persuasive evidence to present. This stage also includes assessing whether an administrative correction is feasible or whether a court filing is necessary. A thorough review reduces surprises later and allows us to outline the timeline, costs, and likely procedural steps required to obtain recognition of the asset as trust property.
We collect and review trust instruments, recorded and unrecorded deeds, title reports, and any correspondence with escrow agents or lenders. This documentation establishes the factual basis for the petition by showing the trust terms and any steps taken toward funding the trust. We also identify any missing pieces and advise on how to obtain them, such as certified copies of deeds or affidavits from witnesses. This preparation ensures that the petition is supported by a clear and organized evidentiary record for the court’s consideration.
Witness declarations are often critical to a Heggstad petition, supplying firsthand accounts of the settlor’s intent and actions. We assist in preparing these statements, ensuring they are factual, timely, and properly formatted for submission. Other supporting evidence may include bank memos, escrow instructions, or communications with title companies. Gathering this material early strengthens the petition and demonstrates a thorough, evidence-based approach that courts rely on when evaluating requests to recognize trust ownership for assets with incomplete title formalities.
In this phase we draft the Heggstad petition and supporting declarations, assembling exhibits that document the trust, the asset, and the circumstances of the intended transfer. The petition lays out the legal and factual basis for the court to find that the property is trust property. Once drafted, we file the petition with the appropriate local court and serve it on interested parties in accordance with procedural rules. Careful attention to pleading and service requirements helps avoid delays and ensures the court has a complete record for decision-making.
Clear pleadings and well-organized exhibits make it easier for the court to understand the sequence of events and the basis for the requested declaration. We focus on a concise presentation that ties documentary evidence to the legal standards courts use in Heggstad matters. Exhibits are labeled and cited precisely so judges can follow the narrative. By anticipating questions and potential objections in the drafting stage, we aim to reduce the need for supplemental filings and make hearings more efficient when they occur.
Proper filing and service on heirs, beneficiaries, and creditors are required to protect due process and prevent future challenges. We ensure that the petition is filed in the correct venue and that all required notices are sent to interested parties under California rules. This includes identifying all possible claimants and using appropriate methods of service when addresses are uncertain. Proper procedural handling reduces grounds for procedural objections and supports a durable judicial determination.
After filing, the court will review the petition and may set a hearing to consider evidence and any objections. We prepare a concise presentation and, where necessary, respond to opposing filings. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order declaring the asset to be trust property. We then assist with implementing that order by coordinating with title companies, banks, and other institutions to update records, record any required documents, and ensure the trustee can manage or transfer the asset under the trust’s terms.
When a hearing occurs, a clear oral presentation and prepared exhibits can be decisive. We organize testimony, prepare declarants, and identify the most compelling documentary evidence to present to the judge. The goal is to show a consistent story of intent and steps taken toward funding the trust. If objections arise, we address them directly and point to supporting materials that corroborate the settlor’s intentions and the trust’s terms. Effective courtroom presentation supports a favorable outcome when factual disputes exist.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we assist in implementing the order by coordinating with title companies to record necessary documents or to remove clouds on title. For financial accounts, we provide institutions with the court order and trust certification to update account ownership. Our goal is to complete the administrative steps so the trustee can manage, sell, or transfer the asset according to the trust, and so beneficiaries receive distributions without further legal impediments.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used to ask the judge to recognize that certain property should be treated as owned by a trust even though title was never formally changed. It is typically used when a settlor intended to fund a revocable living trust but a deed, account change, or title transfer was not completed. The petition presents the trust document, evidence of intent, and supporting statements that tie the asset to the trust, enabling a trustee to manage or distribute that property under the trust’s terms. This remedy is practical when administrative retitling is impractical or when interested parties may dispute ownership. The court evaluates the totality of evidence, including the trust instrument, contemporaneous actions, witness statements, and related documents. If the court finds the facts persuasive, it issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property so the trustee can proceed without opening a full probate estate.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on factors such as the complexity of the asset, the completeness of supporting documentation, and the local court’s calendar. In straightforward cases where documentation is organized and there are no objections, a petition can sometimes be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. However, when evidence needs to be gathered, declarations prepared, or hearings scheduled due to objections, the process may extend to several months or longer depending on court availability. Preparation and proactive coordination with institutions can shorten timelines. Working with counsel to assemble exhibits and secure declarations promptly helps avoid procedural delays. If interested parties raise objections, additional briefing and hearings may be required, which extends the timeframe. Clients should expect some variability and plan accordingly while taking steps to organize records early in the process.
Key evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust document itself, deeds or drafts of deeds, account statements, communications with title companies or escrow agents, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent. Documentary proof that shows the settlor’s consistent plan to place the asset into the trust is highly persuasive. Financial records showing use of trust funds for acquisition or maintenance of property can also support the petition. Witness declarations are often essential; these statements should describe firsthand observations of the settlor’s intent and actions. Lenders, escrow officers, or family members who participated in trust funding can provide helpful accounts. The court evaluates the full record, so organizing clear, contemporaneous documents and credible declarations improves the likelihood of a favorable ruling.
A Heggstad petition can help avoid probate for the specific asset that is recognized as trust property, because a favorable order treats that asset as part of the trust rather than part of a probate estate. This reduces the need to administer that item through probate and can preserve privacy and efficiency for that element of the estate. However, whether probate is avoided entirely depends on the scope of assets involved and whether other assets remain outside the trust. If multiple assets are untransferred, additional petitions or estate administration steps may be required. Also, some assets subject to creditor claims or complex title issues may still trigger separate proceedings. A Heggstad petition is therefore a powerful tool for addressing specific funding failures but must be considered in the broader estate plan context to determine whether probate can be fully avoided.
A court will not automatically grant a Heggstad petition simply because a trust exists; the petitioner must demonstrate by evidence that the settlor intended the specific asset to be part of the trust. Courts look for a coherent factual showing, which can include written documents, contemporaneous actions, and credible witness declarations. If the record supports the petition and no compelling contrary evidence exists, the court may grant the request. When evidence is weak, contradictory, or when substantial objections are raised, the court may deny or reserve decision pending further proof. Therefore, careful preparation of the petition and supporting exhibits is critical. A measured presentation that anticipates and answers likely objections increases the chances of a favorable outcome.
Costs associated with a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the case, the need for witness declarations, court filing fees, and whether a hearing is contested. Routine petitions with clear documentation and cooperative parties tend to be less expensive, while contested matters requiring additional briefing, multiple hearings, or extensive evidence will incur higher costs. Clients should consider both attorney fees and court-related expenses when budgeting for the process. Early evaluation of the case helps estimate likely costs. Gathering documentation promptly and identifying potential areas of dispute allows for targeted work that controls fees. We discuss fee structures and provide realistic estimates after an initial review so clients can make informed decisions about the best path forward for resolving title issues and obtaining judicial recognition of trust ownership.
If an heir or other interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider their filings and may schedule a hearing to resolve factual disputes. Objections commonly assert competing ownership claims or argue that the evidence of intent is insufficient. When objections arise, additional declarations, documentary evidence, or witness testimony may be needed to respond. The court then weighs competing evidence and issues a ruling based on the preponderance of proof presented. Resolving objections may require negotiation, supplemental filings, or evidentiary hearings. In some cases, the parties reach an agreement that avoids prolonged litigation. In others, the court’s decision will determine whether the asset is recognized as trust property. Preparation for potential objections is an important part of the petition strategy to ensure the trustee’s position is thoroughly documented and ready for scrutiny.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can be used to address bank and investment accounts that were not retitled to the trust. The petition includes account records, statements, beneficiary designations, and communications with the institution that demonstrate the settlor intended the account to be governed by the trust. Many institutions will require clear documentation or a court order before recognizing a trustee’s authority, so a judicial declaration can be the most effective route to obtain access and update records. When dealing with financial institutions, presenting a court order along with a certification of trust helps institutions accept the trustee’s authority without requiring disclosure of the trust’s full terms. This approach balances the need for institutional safeguards with the trustee’s ability to manage accounts and make distributions consistent with the settlor’s plan.
Retitling property before filing can be effective when all parties cooperate and the institution involved accepts the change. When that is feasible, administrative retitling resolves the issue with less court involvement and cost. However, if parties disagree, if the settlor is unable to sign, or if institutions refuse to accept retitling without additional authority, filing a Heggstad petition can provide a durable legal solution recognized by the court and by third parties. The decision to retitle or to petition depends on the specific facts and the asset’s context. We assess the feasibility of a nonjudicial correction during the initial review and recommend the best path based on institutional demands, potential objections, and the client’s preference for speed, cost, and long-term certainty.
To begin, gather the trust document, any deeds or unrecorded transfer drafts, account statements, and any communications related to the asset’s intended transfer. Also identify potential witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent, such as family members, attorneys, escrow officers, or financial advisors. Contact our office with these materials so we can review the facts and advise whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate or whether an administrative correction would succeed. After an initial review, we outline next steps including necessary declarations, exhibits, and estimated timelines. We prepare the petition and handle filing and service requirements, keeping you informed throughout. Early documentation and prompt action help preserve evidence and improve the likelihood of a timely resolution for trust administration needs in Cabazon and Riverside County.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas