A Heggstad petition is a legal process used in California to ask the probate court to recognize property that should pass to a decedent’s trust even though the asset remained titled in the decedent’s individual name at the time of death. In Canyon Lake and the surrounding Riverside County area, families commonly encounter this issue when a trust was intended to hold assets but formal transfer paperwork was not completed. This introductory overview explains the purpose of the petition, typical scenarios where it applies, and how pursuing a Heggstad petition can help ensure the decedent’s estate plan is carried out as intended without resorting to a full probate when avoidable.
Many people create revocable living trusts to simplify transfer of assets at death, but sometimes deeds, accounts, or other assets remain in a person’s name. A Heggstad petition asks the court to treat those assets as if they had been transferred into the trust, based on the decedent’s intent and surrounding documents such as a pour-over will or trust certification. This paragraph explains typical documents and evidence used in support of the petition, how it interacts with other estate planning tools, and why acting promptly after a loved one’s death helps preserve the trust administration process and reduce conflicts among beneficiaries.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the decedent’s plan by having the court acknowledge that mistakenly retained assets belong to the trust. This remedy benefits beneficiaries by clarifying ownership, unlocking access to assets that should be governed by trust terms, and minimizing delays in administering trust affairs. In many cases a Heggstad petition allows transfer of the asset title without full probate, which can reduce costs and keep family affairs more private. The petition also helps prevent disputes by providing a judicial determination of the decedent’s intended disposition and the legal basis for treating the asset as a trust asset under California law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handles Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters for clients in Canyon Lake and Riverside County with a focus on clear communication and practical results. Our approach emphasizes careful document review to identify evidence such as trust language, pour-over wills, deed history, beneficiary statements, and other records that demonstrate the decedent’s intent. We work with personal representatives and trustees to assemble a persuasive petition, coordinate necessary notices, and pursue timely resolution in probate court. The goal is to restore assets to the trust efficiently while minimizing family stress and legal expense.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to decree that property should be considered trust property despite remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition typically relies on evidence showing the decedent intended the trust to own the property, such as a signed trust agreement, transfer documents drafted but not completed, or consistent estate planning documents like a pour-over will. The legal standard involves demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that the decedent intended the transfer to the trust. Understanding these requirements helps trustees and beneficiaries determine whether a Heggstad petition is an appropriate path for addressing title discrepancies without full probate administration.
The procedural aspects of a Heggstad petition include preparing pleadings, identifying affected assets, and serving required parties. The petition will describe the property, trace its transfer history, and present evidence of intent to assign it to the trust. Courts also consider whether alternative remedies exist and whether the requested relief is consistent with probate law and the trust’s terms. Working through these steps ensures the trustee can secure clear title, distribute assets according to the trust, and resolve challenges from interested parties. Timely action and careful documentation strengthen the petition and reduce the likelihood of contested hearings.
A Heggstad petition is a formal request to the probate court to recognize that certain property should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended it to be held in trust even though title was not updated. This remedy addresses situations where a revocable living trust exists and a pour-over will or other documents indicate the decedent intended assets to flow into the trust, but some items were never retitled. The petition explains the factual basis for the claim, cites relevant trust provisions and supporting documents, and asks the court to enter an order confirming the trust’s ownership to facilitate administration and distribution according to the trust’s terms.
Preparing a Heggstad petition involves several key elements: identifying the asset requiring judicial recognition, collecting documentation that shows the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, preparing declarations and exhibits, and giving notice to interested parties such as heirs or creditors. The process typically includes filing the petition in the local probate court, addressing any objections, and presenting evidence at a hearing if necessary. Successful petitions often rest on clear documentary evidence and consistent statements of intent, so careful evidence gathering and a well-structured petition are essential to obtaining an order that transfers title into the trust estate.
Familiarity with common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate the petition process. Key concepts include trust, pour-over will, decedent, title, petition, order, and probate court. Knowing these terms clarifies roles and expectations: the trustee administers the trust, the pour-over will serves as a backup instrument, and the court evaluates the petition based on evidence and applicable law. This description sets the stage for short definitions of frequently encountered phrases so clients can better understand the legal framework and communicate effectively with counsel while assembling the documentation needed to support a Heggstad petition.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a settlor transfers assets to a trustee to hold and manage for the benefit of named beneficiaries according to the trust terms. In estate planning, revocable living trusts are commonly used to avoid probate, provide continuity of asset management, and set instructions for distribution at death. When assets are intended to be in a trust but remain incorrectly titled, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize those assets as part of the trust if evidence shows the decedent intended the trust to own them, preserving the settlor’s distribution plan and simplifying administration.
A pour-over will is an estate planning document that directs any assets remaining in a decedent’s name at death to be transferred into a previously established trust. It acts as a safety net for property not formally transferred during the decedent’s lifetime. When assets remain outside the trust despite a pour-over will, a Heggstad petition can be filed to show that the decedent intended those assets to be trust property and to request the court’s recognition that title should be treated as part of the trust estate for administration and distribution purposes.
Title refers to the legal ownership of an asset, such as real estate, bank accounts, or securities. Proper estate planning requires that title reflect the settlor’s intentions; otherwise, assets may not transfer smoothly. A Heggstad petition focuses on assets whose title remains in the decedent’s name despite the existence of a trust. The petition seeks a court declaration that those assets should be considered trust property based on the decedent’s intent and supporting documents, enabling the trustee to manage and distribute the assets consistent with the trust’s provisions.
A probate court order is a judicial determination addressing disputed matters arising after death, including petitions that concern asset ownership and administration. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the probate court may issue an order confirming that specific assets are to be treated as trust property despite how title appears. This order provides legal clarity, authorizes trustees to take necessary actions to retitle assets, and reduces the risk of future challenges by formally documenting the court’s finding regarding the decedent’s intent and the proper disposition of the property.
When assets remain titled in a decedent’s name, families can pursue different legal paths including a Heggstad petition, a full probate proceeding, or informal resolution when all interested parties agree. A Heggstad petition specifically targets recognition of trust ownership and can be faster and more private than probate if the facts support it. Probate may be necessary if there are broader estate matters, creditor claims, or complex disputes. Informal settlements are possible when heirs and the trustee reach agreement but may not provide the same legal certainty as a court order. Choosing the right approach depends on the asset types, family dynamics, and the clarity of the decedent’s documentation.
A limited approach such as filing a Heggstad petition is often sufficient when the trust documents, pour-over will, and other records clearly reflect the decedent’s intent and interested parties generally agree on the disposition. When heirs and the trustee share an understanding of the estate plan and the asset values are modest, the focused petition can resolve title issues without initiating a comprehensive probate. This path preserves privacy and reduces time and legal expense, while producing a court order that clarifies ownership and enables the trustee to proceed with trust administration in a straightforward manner.
A limited approach is also appropriate when only a small number of assets have title problems, such as a single real property parcel or a bank account that was never retitled. If the underlying trust and related documents demonstrate intent to include those assets, a Heggstad petition tailored to those items can efficiently correct title without addressing unrelated estate matters. This focused remedy reduces disruption to the broader administration and helps trustees secure legal authority to retitle assets and distribute them under the trust terms with minimal court involvement.
A comprehensive probate process may be necessary when multiple assets, creditor claims, competing claims among heirs, or ambiguities in estate documents exist. In such circumstances, the probate court’s broader jurisdiction can resolve disputes about asset ownership, debts, and distribution priorities. When family disagreements are entrenched or key documents are missing or contradictory, fuller court oversight provides a structured forum for evidence presentation and formal rulings. This more involved path can take longer and be more public, but it sometimes offers the only reliable means to settle complex estate controversies and ensure lawful distribution.
If the decedent’s estate faces significant creditor claims, tax issues, or potential personal liability exposure linked to assets titled in the decedent’s name, a comprehensive approach may be recommended. Probate can establish a process for notifying creditors, addressing claims, and determining priorities under California law. When potential liabilities affect the ability to transfer assets into a trust cleanly, court-supervised administration ensures that obligations are handled properly and that distributions occur in compliance with legal requirements, thereby protecting both the estate and the beneficiaries from later challenges.
Obtaining a court order that recognizes assets as trust property provides certainty and legal authority for trustees to manage, retitle, and distribute those assets. This formal recognition reduces the risk of subsequent disputes, facilitates clear recordkeeping, and can streamline transactions such as property sales or account transfers. For beneficiaries, the order confirms that distributions should follow the trust terms, offering reassurance that the decedent’s plan will be followed. In some cases, court involvement also helps expedite third-party cooperation from banks, title companies, and other institutions that require official documentation to release or transfer assets.
A comprehensive, court-validated solution can also provide a single, enforceable adjudication that binds interested parties and limits future litigation over ownership. When the petition is supported by solid documentation and a clear factual record, courts grant the relief needed to place assets into the trust and allow the trustee to proceed with administration duties. This approach gives trustees clarity to distribute assets, address tax filings, and close estate matters without repeated challenges, while preserving privacy better than a protracted, contested probate in some scenarios.
One major benefit of pursuing court confirmation is obtaining clear title and legal certainty for trust assets. With a court order, banks, transfer agents, and title companies are more likely to cooperate with the trustee’s requests to transfer or distribute property. This clearance is particularly helpful for real property, brokerage accounts, and retirement accounts that require formal documentation to retitle ownership. By resolving title inconsistencies through court authority, trustees avoid delays and reduce the risk of future contests that could disrupt distributions and estate settlement.
A court order that confirms trust ownership reduces the likelihood of later challenges because it creates an official record of the court’s findings and rulings. Interested parties who receive proper notice and had an opportunity to object are less likely to reopen disputes after an adjudication. This protection helps trustees carry out their duties with greater confidence and benefits beneficiaries by preserving assets for intended distributions. The judicial determination also helps clarify any ambiguous situations for successors, title companies, and financial institutions that need a clear legal basis for processing transfers.
Begin collecting all relevant documents as soon as possible after the decedent’s death. Key items include the trust agreement, pour-over will, deeds, account statements, transfer-on-death designations, and any communications that reflect the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Early collection helps preserve evidence that supports a petition and can reveal whether title issues are isolated or widespread. Prompt documentation also allows the trustee to meet notice deadlines, coordinate with financial institutions, and prepare a thorough petition that demonstrates why the asset should be treated as trust property under California law.
Be sure to document any attempts the decedent made to transfer assets into the trust, such as prepared but unsigned deeds, account change forms, or instructions to advisors. Evidence of steps taken toward retitling strengthens a petition by showing the decedent’s plan to fund the trust. Gather correspondence with attorneys, financial institutions, and title companies, and collect any witness declarations that can attest to the decedent’s statements or actions. A comprehensive evidentiary record improves the likelihood of obtaining an order recognizing the asset as trust property and reduces the chance of protracted litigation.
Consider a Heggstad petition when a decedent left a trust and assets that should have been transferred into it remain in the decedent’s name. Typical triggers include real estate still titled in the decedent’s name, bank accounts that were not retitled, or securities with outdated ownership records. When the trust and related documents demonstrate intent, the petition can restore those assets to the trust without fully opening probate. This option promotes a smoother transition of asset management, reduces administrative friction for the trustee, and helps ensure distributions conform to the decedent’s estate planning goals.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to resolve ambiguity and prevent disputes among beneficiaries. Even when family members generally agree, unresolved title issues can cause delays and complicate transactions like property sales or account transfers. A court order provides definitive legal authority to retitle assets, eliminating uncertainty for third parties who require clear documentation to transfer ownership. Trustees benefit from the formal authorization to act, which protects them from later claims and enables effective administration of the trust estate.
Common circumstances include when a decedent moved into assisted living and did not complete transfer paperwork, when deeds were prepared but not recorded, when updated beneficiary designations were not processed, or when property was overlooked during estate planning updates. Life events, illness, or administrative oversights often leave assets titled in the decedent’s name despite a trust being in place. When paperwork and witness accounts show intent to transfer those assets to the trust, filing a Heggstad petition is often the appropriate remedy to align asset ownership with the decedent’s plan.
Real property is a frequent subject of Heggstad petitions when the deed remains in the decedent’s name even though the trust was intended to own the home or other real estate. This situation can arise when a deed was prepared but not recorded, or when closing circumstances prevented timely retitling. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the property as trust property based on the trust documents and surrounding evidence of intent, enabling the trustee to manage, sell, or distribute the property according to the trust terms without resorting to a full probate process in many cases.
Bank or investment accounts sometimes remain in the decedent’s name due to missed paperwork or processing delays. When account paperwork, statements, or communications show the decedent intended to place accounts in the trust, a Heggstad petition can clarify ownership. Financial institutions often require a court order or trustee documentation to release funds or retitle accounts, and a judicial determination helps trustees access and manage these assets for distribution. The petition process addresses the paperwork gap and aligns asset control with the trust’s instructions.
Assets for which transfer documentation is incomplete, such as prepared but unsigned deeds, trust transfer forms left unprocessed, or accounts with outdated registrations, may qualify for a Heggstad petition. Demonstrating the decedent’s intent through related documents and witness statements supports the court’s recognition that the asset belonged to the trust in substance. Resolving these discrepancies via petition is often faster and less invasive than full probate, and it provides the trustee with the authorization needed to move forward with trust administration and beneficiary distributions.
If you are dealing with title discrepancies or assets left outside a trust in Canyon Lake, our office can assist with evaluating whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We review trust documents, deeds, account records, and communications to determine whether the facts support seeking a court order to recognize the assets as trust property. The process includes preparing the petition, coordinating required notices, and guiding the trustee through any hearings or negotiated resolutions. Our goal is to help families resolve these matters efficiently so trustees can administer the trust according to the decedent’s wishes.
Our firm focuses on practical solutions for trust administration and title issues, including Heggstad petitions. We prioritize careful document review and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries to assemble a compelling petition. By identifying the strongest supporting evidence and addressing potential objections proactively, we work to obtain a court order that clarifies asset ownership and enables efficient trust administration. Our approach aims to reduce stress on families by handling procedural requirements and advocating for a resolution that honors the decedent’s estate plan.
We provide a straightforward process to guide trustees through the legal steps involved in seeking recognition of trust assets. This includes drafting pleadings, preparing exhibits, serving notice to required parties, and representing the trustee at hearings if necessary. We also coordinate with title companies and financial institutions to implement the court’s order and retitle property when appropriate. Our goal is to handle the technical details so trustees can focus on fulfilling fiduciary duties and carrying out the decedent’s wishes as efficiently as possible.
Clients working with our firm receive tailored advice based on the specific facts of their matter, including an assessment of whether a Heggstad petition or another pathway is most likely to achieve the desired outcome. We explain the likely timeline, required documentation, and potential challenges so trustees and beneficiaries know what to expect. This transparent planning helps families make informed decisions while pursuing a resolution that secures assets for the trust and supports orderly distribution according to the decedent’s planning documents.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to identify the assets, review trust and estate documents, and gather evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We then prepare a petition that explains the factual and legal basis for treating the assets as trust property, assemble supporting exhibits, and handle necessary service and filing steps. If the petition is contested, we represent the trustee at hearings and pursue resolution through court proceedings or negotiated settlement. Throughout, we keep trustees informed about timelines and coordinate with financial institutions to implement the court’s directives once an order is obtained.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust, any pour-over will, deeds, account records, and related correspondence that may evidence intent to transfer assets. This assessment determines whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate remedy and identifies the specific assets to include. Gathering clear documentary support and witness declarations at this stage is essential to building a persuasive petition. We also evaluate whether interested parties are likely to object and consider alternate dispute resolution opportunities to avoid protracted litigation when feasible.
Collecting all relevant trustee and decedent documents helps establish a paper trail that supports the petition. This includes certified copies of the trust agreement, any amendments, deeds, beneficiary designations, account statements, and correspondence with advisors. We prepare a list of necessary documents and work with the trustee to obtain certified copies and supporting declarations from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent. Well-organized documentation is critical to persuading the court that the assets should be treated as trust property.
We identify the parties who must receive notice of the petition and anticipate potential objections so we can address them proactively. This includes heirs, known creditors, and any other interested persons under California probate rules. Proper notice and strategic handling of foreseeable disputes reduce the likelihood of surprise challenges. If objections are likely, we develop a plan for responding with additional evidence or negotiation to resolve issues outside of contested litigation when that approach serves the client’s objectives.
Once the petition and exhibits are assembled, we file the petition with the appropriate Riverside County probate court and serve required notices to interested parties. The filing includes declarations, documentary exhibits, and a proposed order. Service must comply with statutory rules to ensure the court has jurisdiction and to provide interested persons with an opportunity to respond. Timely and correct filing and service protect the petition from procedural challenges and lay the groundwork for the court to consider the merits of the request to treat the asset as trust property.
Drafting a persuasive petition requires clearly describing the asset, the chain of title, and the reasons the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust. Supporting exhibits should be organized, labeled, and referenced in the petition so the court can readily verify the factual assertions. Declarations from witnesses, copies of unsigned transfer documents, and relevant correspondence strengthen the factual record. A well-prepared filing reduces ambiguity and helps the court reach a decisive ruling without unnecessary delay.
Complying with service requirements and local court rules is essential to avoid procedural defects. We ensure that all interested parties are properly served using allowed methods and that court filing requirements are strictly followed. This attention to procedural detail helps prevent objections based on technical grounds and allows the court to proceed to the merits. Proper compliance also reassures institutions like banks and title companies that the petition was handled according to legal standards, making implementation of a court order smoother once granted.
After filing and service, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the petition. If the petition is unopposed and the record is clear, the court may grant the order without a contested hearing. If objections arise, we present evidence and respond to challenges at the hearing. Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we assist the trustee in implementing the order by coordinating retitling with title companies, financial institutions, and other third parties so assets can be managed and distributed under the trust.
At any required hearing, we present the documentary records and witness declarations that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We explain the legal basis for the petition and address any objections raised by interested parties. Clear, organized presentation of exhibits and persuasive witness testimony can help the court find in favor of treating the asset as trust property. If settlement is possible, we advise the trustee on potential resolutions that avoid protracted litigation while securing the necessary relief.
After the court grants the order, we assist the trustee with implementing the decision by providing certified copies of the order, preparing necessary transfer documents, and coordinating with banks, title companies, and transfer agents. This practical follow-through ensures assets are retitled promptly and distributed under the trust’s terms. We also document the actions taken to maintain a clear administrative record for the trust, which helps protect the trustee from future claims and facilitates final accounting and closure of the trust administration process.
A Heggstad petition is a request filed in probate court asking the judge to declare that certain assets should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended them to be in the trust despite title remaining in the decedent’s name. It is commonly used when a revocable living trust exists but some assets were never retitled, or when deeds or account paperwork were prepared but not completed. The petition provides a judicial finding that aligns property ownership with the decedent’s documented estate plan. The petition typically includes a description of the asset, the trust instrument, a chain of title, and supporting evidence such as declarations or correspondence showing the decedent’s intent. If the court is persuaded, it issues an order confirming trust ownership, which helps trustees retitle the asset and proceed with administration according to the trust’s terms. This remedy often avoids the need for a full probate administration when the issues are limited to title recognition.
A Heggstad petition is narrower than a full probate action because it focuses on declaring that specific property should be treated as trust property rather than addressing all estate administration issues. Probate is a comprehensive process used to determine heirs, settle debts, and distribute property when no valid trust covers the assets. A Heggstad petition aims to keep administration within the trust framework by having the court recognize assets as belonging to the trust when appropriate. While probate handles creditor claims and complex disputes, a successful Heggstad petition gives trustees the legal justification to retitle assets and continue trust administration without opening full probate for those assets. When broader estate issues or creditor claims exist, probate may still be necessary, but the petition can simplify matters for assets clearly intended to be in the trust.
Support for a Heggstad petition usually comes from documentary evidence and witness statements that reflect the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Common items include the trust agreement and amendments, pour-over wills, drafts of deeds or transfer forms, bank statements showing trust accounts, correspondence with attorneys or financial advisors, and declarations from people who can attest to the decedent’s intentions. A clear chain of events showing attempts to transfer or consistent estate planning documents strengthens the case. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence presented, and organized, timely documentation improves the chance of a favorable ruling. When direct documentary proof is limited, credible witness testimony and corroborating details can still support the petition, though petitions backed by stronger written records typically proceed more smoothly.
When filing a Heggstad petition, statutory notice requirements must be met so that interested parties have an opportunity to object. Typical notice recipients include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs under intestacy rules, known creditors, and persons entitled to receive notice under California probate law. Proper service and certification of notice are important to establish the court’s jurisdiction and to ensure the resulting order is not subject to procedural challenge. Failure to provide correct notice can delay proceedings or provide grounds for post-judgment challenges. Ensuring accurate, timely notice also helps facilitate potential informal resolution among interested parties and can reduce the likelihood of contested hearings by giving stakeholders a chance to review the petition and raise concerns early in the process.
A Heggstad petition can address bank accounts and certain investment accounts when the decedent intended those assets to be trust property but paperwork was not completed. However, some financial institutions and certain account types, such as retirement plans with beneficiary designations, may have specific rules that complicate retitling. The petition can provide the court order financial institutions often require to release funds or to retitle accounts to the trustee when the evidence supports trust ownership. For retirement accounts and accounts governed by federal rules, the trustee should review beneficiary designations and plan documents since those controls often supersede trust claims. In many situations, the petition clarifies ownership for traditional accounts and securities, while trustees may need additional steps or documentation to address regulated accounts governed by federal or plan-specific rules.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Riverside County varies depending on the court’s schedule, the completeness of the filing, and whether objections arise. An uncontested petition supported by clear evidence can sometimes be resolved within a few months, while contested matters may take substantially longer. Preparation time is also a factor, as gathering documents and assembling witness declarations can require careful attention to detail which affects the filing timeline. Local court workload and the complexity of the title issues influence the overall duration. Working proactively to organize documentation, comply with notice requirements, and address potential objections can shorten the process. If the matter becomes contested, additional hearings and briefing may extend the timeline significantly, so prompt preparation and thorough filing help expedite resolution.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court may schedule a hearing to evaluate the competing claims and evidence. The objecting party can present reasons why the asset should not be treated as trust property, such as alleging lack of intent, competing title interests, or procedural defects. The court then weighs the evidence and decides whether the petition should be granted, denied, or modified based on legal standards and the factual record. Responses to objections may include submitting additional documentation, witness declarations, or legal arguments to rebut challenges. Where appropriate, parties may pursue negotiated resolutions to avoid prolonged litigation, but when disputes cannot be resolved, the court’s adjudication provides the final determination regarding ownership and the appropriate relief.
A court order that recognizes trust ownership usually provides the legal authority necessary for third parties like banks, title companies, and transfer agents to retitle assets or release funds to the trustee. These institutions often require certified copies of the order to process transfers. Having an official order reduces ambiguity and makes institutions more willing to cooperate with the trustee’s requests to manage and distribute assets under the trust’s terms. However, some third parties may have internal requirements or additional documentation requests, and accounts governed by federal law or specific plan terms may require further steps. The trustee should be prepared to present the court order along with supporting paperwork to satisfy institutional policies and complete the retitling process.
A Heggstad petition filed in probate court becomes part of the court record, and hearings and filings may be accessible to interested parties and the public depending on local rules. While the petition can resolve matters without a wide public probate administration, it is not inherently private like an internal trustee action. Parties who value privacy should be aware that court involvement may create public records and should consider this factor when deciding how to proceed. That said, a petition focused on specific assets typically involves less public exposure than a full probate proceeding that addresses the entire estate. Where privacy is a significant concern, trustees can discuss strategies to limit disclosure while complying with legal notice and filing requirements, and courts sometimes consider reasonable measures to protect sensitive information in filings.
A trustee preparing to file a Heggstad petition should begin by compiling certified copies of the trust and related estate planning documents, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence showing intent to fund the trust. Gathering witness information and preparing declarations from individuals familiar with the decedent’s intentions strengthens the petition. Trustees should also inventory assets and identify any potential claimants or interested persons who require notice under probate rules. It is helpful for the trustee to maintain organized records and to consider how institutions will respond to a court order. Consulting counsel early in the process ensures procedural compliance for filing and service, anticipates likely objections, and helps frame the petition to increase the likelihood of a favorable court decision that expedites retitling and distribution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas