A Heggstad petition is a legal request used in California to have property recognized as part of an existing trust when the title was never formally transferred. In Coachella and throughout Riverside County, these petitions help connect assets to trust documents created during estate planning, resolving situations where deeds, accounts, or other assets were omitted from formal trust transfers. This page explains how a Heggstad petition works, who may need one, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist in preparing the necessary documentation and court filings to correct title issues and protect beneficiaries’ interests under California law.
Many families discover that assets meant to fund a living trust were never retitled or recorded properly, leaving those items vulnerable to probate or unclear ownership. A Heggstad petition clarifies the settlor’s intent by asking the court to declare that certain property is already part of the trust. For residents of Coachella seeking to avoid probate, resolve title problems, or ensure a trust operates as intended, the petition provides a practical path to align property records with estate planning documents without undoing the settlor’s plans or causing unnecessary delay for beneficiaries.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the benefits of a trust by preventing assets from falling into probate and by confirming the settlor’s plan for distribution. When property was overlooked during trust funding, the petition allows the court to recognize the settlor’s intent and direct that title issues be resolved in a manner consistent with trust documents. This can streamline trust administration, reduce costs and delays for heirs, and protect privacy by keeping property matters out of open probate proceedings. For families in Riverside County, a properly prepared petition supports orderly transfer and management of trust assets.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offer seasoned representation in estate planning matters, including Heggstad petitions, for clients across California. Our practice handles document review, title correction strategies, court petitions, and communications with third parties to resolve omitted asset issues. We focus on clear guidance, timely filings, and careful documentation to help clients avoid protracted disputes. Clients in Coachella benefit from a firm that understands Riverside County procedures and works to align recorded property with trust provisions, ensuring beneficiaries receive intended distributions with minimal court delay and administrative friction.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to declare that certain assets are part of a living trust because the settlor intended them to be included, even though formal title transfer did not occur. The petition typically includes evidence such as the trust document, deeds, beneficiary statements, and any contemporaneous writings or actions showing the settlor’s intent. In Riverside County courts, the judge evaluates whether the omitted assets should be treated as trust property. The procedure provides a targeted remedy for correcting paperwork mistakes without reopening the trust or altering its substantive terms.
The Heggstad process often starts with a careful inventory and review of estate planning records to identify assets that were intended for the trust but were never properly titled. Once the issue is documented, a petition is drafted and filed with the probate court, and notices are provided to interested parties, including beneficiaries and potential creditors. If contested, the petition may proceed to a hearing where the court examines the evidence of intent. With successful adjudication, records can be corrected and property treated according to the trust, avoiding separate probate procedures for those assets.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that property should be considered trust property despite the absence of formal transfer paperwork. The underlying legal premise is that the settlor’s intent governs whether an asset belongs to the trust. To succeed, the petition must show a preponderance of evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be included. This may include testimony, documentary evidence, and the trust terms themselves. The purpose is not to rewrite the trust but to align actual ownership records with the trust creator’s plan so administration can proceed in accordance with established estate documents.
Preparing a Heggstad petition requires gathering the trust instrument, title documents, deeds, account statements, and any contemporaneous communications that indicate intent to fund the trust. The petition must clearly identify each item of property and explain why it should be included. Proper notice to interested parties, accurate declarations under penalty of perjury, and familiarity with local court procedures are essential. Following filing, the court may set a hearing and require additional proof. The process can be straightforward when documentation is clear, and more detailed when assets are contested or records are incomplete.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad petitions helps clients follow the process and assess documentation needs. Key concepts include the settlor’s intent, trust vesting, title transfer, pour-over wills, and the probate court’s role in resolving conflicting records. Familiarity with these terms lets a client provide the right records and understand the remedies the court can order. Clear definitions reduce confusion and help family members participate constructively, whether providing evidence, accepting a petition, or responding to notices about the court proceeding affecting trust property.
The settlor is the person who created the living trust and set out the terms for how assets should be managed and distributed. Evidence of the settlor’s actions and written directions is central to a Heggstad petition because the court must determine what the settlor intended regarding particular property. Documents such as trust instruments, deeds signed by the settlor, and contemporaneous correspondence can show intent. When an asset was intended for the trust but never retitled, the settlor’s intent, as supported by available records, guides the court’s decision on whether to treat the item as trust property.
A Heggstad petition is a specific probate court filing used to confirm that property was intended to be trust property despite the lack of formal transfer into the trust. Originating from a California case addressing omitted property, this petition asks the court to recognize the settlor’s intent and declare the property part of the trust. The petition typically lists the assets, describes the evidence supporting inclusion, and provides notices to interested parties. Successful petitions establish title alignment and help avoid separate probate proceedings for the omitted items.
A trustee is the person or entity named in a trust to hold, manage, and distribute trust assets according to the trust’s terms. In Heggstad matters, the trustee often brings or supports the petition to include omitted assets so that all trust property can be handled consistently. The trustee’s duties include compiling records, explaining the handling of assets, and ensuring distributions follow the trust document. Courts look to trustee actions and the trust terms to determine whether assets should be recognized as part of the trust for management and distribution purposes.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets not already in a living trust into the trust upon the settlor’s death. While it can capture leftover items, a pour-over will does not prevent probate of those assets. When assets intended for the trust were never retitled, a Heggstad petition can sometimes achieve the intended trust result without relying on probate transfers under a pour-over will. The petition focuses on showing the settlor intended the property for the trust so that title and record corrections reflect that original plan.
When property intended for a trust was omitted from formal funding, there are different legal paths: file a Heggstad petition to recognize the assets as trust property, pursue a probate proceeding such as a simple probate or a small estate process, or use a transfer-on-death designation where applicable. Each option has trade-offs in cost, time, privacy, and complexity. A Heggstad petition tends to keep matters within trust administration and out of open probate, preserving privacy and potentially reducing delays. The best path depends on the asset type, available evidence, and who may object to the transfer.
A limited Heggstad petition can be sufficient when documentation clearly shows that the settlor intended the omitted assets to be part of the trust. If deeds, account ownership records, trust provisions, and contemporaneous notes or communications align, the court can often resolve title issues with a concise petition. This approach is efficient because it focuses on the specific items that were omitted rather than reopening general estate matters. Clarity in records reduces contested litigation and enables faster correction of property records to reflect the settlor’s planning choices.
A targeted petition works well when interested parties, including beneficiaries and potential creditors, either support the correction or do not object. Where heirs agree on the settlor’s intent or the asset values are modest, courts are more likely to grant petitions without extended hearings. In those circumstances, a focused filing minimizes cost and delay and keeps asset administration aligned under the trust. Effective communication with family members and timely service of required notices often contributes to a smoother path to court approval for omitted assets.
Comprehensive legal support becomes important when ownership records are inconsistent, assets have complex titling, or multiple jurisdictions are involved. In those situations, a detailed review, coordination with banks or title companies, and careful preparation for contested hearings may be necessary. Where documents conflict or the settlor’s intent is not plainly documented, broader assistance can help reconstruct intent and gather supporting evidence. This work often involves negotiations with potential objectors and ensuring that any petition is backed by thorough declarations and exhibits appropriate for court review.
When beneficiaries dispute whether omitted property should be treated as trust assets, or when contested petitions involve substantial values, more intensive representation is advisable. A contested proceeding may require testimony, expert valuation, or detailed analysis of transactions and intent. In those cases, a comprehensive approach includes pre-filing strategy, discovery, and courtroom preparation to present a persuasive case to the judge. The goal is to protect the trust’s integrity, defend beneficiaries’ rights, and secure a resolution that honors the settlor’s plan while addressing any legitimate objections.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad petitions ensures that all potential title issues and related estate matters are addressed so that the trust can be administered smoothly. The process includes reviewing estate planning documents, communicating with financial institutions and title companies, preparing detailed petitions and declarations, and managing notice and service requirements. This thorough handling reduces the likelihood of later disputes, uncovers additional omitted assets, and aligns property records with the settlor’s intentions, ultimately saving time and limiting the risk of unexpected costs during administration.
Beyond the immediate correction of titles, a full-service review can reveal opportunities to streamline overall estate administration, such as updating pour-over wills, coordinating beneficiary designations, and suggesting follow-up trust management steps. Addressing related documents and potential gaps now helps prevent future ambiguity. For families with multiple properties, retirement accounts, or business interests, integrated handling of Heggstad matters supports continuity in asset management and decreases the chance that additional probate filings will be necessary later on.
A comprehensive approach aims to keep assets within trust administration and out of open probate whenever possible. By aligning title records and court recognition with the trust’s terms, families preserve privacy and avoid the publicity associated with probate court filings. This reduces administrative burden for heirs and can protect relationships by minimizing contentious court proceedings. Clear resolution of omitted assets through a properly documented petition supports efficient distributions and recorded titles that reflect the settlor’s wishes, preserving continuity and dignity in the administration process.
Resolving title inconsistencies and documenting the settlor’s intent thoroughly helps reduce the chance of future disputes among heirs and other interested parties. When court orders and corrected records make the trust inventory clear, successors and trustees can act with confidence. This clarity benefits trustees managing distributions and beneficiaries who rely on timely access to assets. A comprehensive remedy creates a stronger administrative foundation that supports efficient trust management, reduces litigation risks, and minimizes the administrative overhead of resolving similar issues in the future.
Collecting deeds, trust instruments, account statements, and any written directions from the settlor is the first and most important preparatory step. Having a complete file simplifies drafting the petition and supports the narrative of the settlor’s intent. Early documentation reduces delays in filing and can prevent follow-up requests from the court. When you gather records promptly, it is also easier to identify other assets that may be affected, determine who must be notified, and create a clear exhibit list to accompany declarations and the petition itself for the judge’s review.
Engaging banks, brokerage firms, and title companies early can help resolve retitling or transfer hurdles more efficiently. These institutions may require certified court orders, specific forms, or updated beneficiary designations to effect changes in ownership records. Coordinating with them reduces administrative friction after the court issues an order and helps ensure that corrected records are recorded and reflected in account statements. Early coordination also exposes any unexpected complications related to beneficiary designations, account ownership, or lien issues that need addressing before finalizing the petition filing.
Consider a Heggstad petition when property intended for a living trust remains titled in the settlor’s personal name or otherwise omitted from trust records. This includes real estate deeds, bank or brokerage accounts, and certain vehicle or business interests that were overlooked during the trust funding process. The petition helps align title and trust documents so that assets are administered according to the settlor’s plan. If avoiding probate, protecting privacy, and ensuring smooth distributions are priorities, pursuing the petition can be an efficient remedy for correcting these administrative oversights.
A petition is also appropriate when a pour-over will is insufficient to address property concerns or when beneficiaries would face delay and costs in separate probate proceedings. When family members want a clear path to honor the settlor’s arrangements and minimize court involvement, asking the probate court to recognize omitted assets as trust property is often the most direct solution. Additionally, when title issues interfere with sales or the transfer of property during trust administration, a petition can remove obstacles and allow trustees to fulfill their duties without unnecessary interruptions.
Common triggers for a Heggstad petition include overlooked deeds after a trust was created, bank or brokerage accounts still held in an individual’s name, failure to retitle vehicles or business interests, and assets discovered during trust administration that were never transferred. Other situations include missing signature pages, incomplete trust schedules, or changes in account ownership that were not updated. When trustees or family members encounter these issues while settling an estate, the petition offers a legal mechanism to reconcile records with the trust instrument and avoid separate probate for those assets.
Often, real estate intended for a trust remains listed in the settlor’s name because deed transfers were not completed. This can occur when property acquisitions happened after trust creation or when transfer formalities were overlooked. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare the real property part of the trust, allowing trustees to manage or transfer the asset under trust terms. Correcting real property title issues is important to facilitate sales, refinance transactions, and clear chains of title for future beneficiaries.
Bank or brokerage accounts may remain in an individual’s name if account retitling was missed, beneficiary designations are unclear, or custodian procedures were not followed. These omissions can complicate trust administration and potentially subject assets to probate. A Heggstad petition documents the settlor’s intent to include those accounts in the trust and seeks court recognition so trustees can access and distribute the funds according to the trust instrument. This reduces administrative friction and clarifies entitlement for beneficiaries.
During inventory or accounting for trust administration, trustees sometimes discover items that were never transferred, such as retirement accounts, personal property, or small business interests. Identifying these assets prompts review and, when necessary, a Heggstad petition to align them with the trust. Addressing these discoveries early helps avoid delays in completing trust distributions and prevents the need for separate probate proceedings for each omitted item. A clear inventory supports a focused petition and smoother administration overall.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist Coachella families with reviewing trust documents, identifying omitted assets, preparing Heggstad petitions, and managing required notices and court filings. We work with trustees and family members to gather necessary records, coordinate with financial institutions, and present supporting declarations to the probate court. Our goal is to achieve court recognition of trust property so administration can proceed without unnecessary probate. Residents benefit from responsive service, clear explanations of the process, and practical steps tailored to local court procedures and timelines.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because of the firm’s practical approach to resolving omitted asset and trust funding issues. We prioritize thorough documentation, clear communication with heirs and institutions, and careful preparation of court filings so that petitions proceed efficiently. By focusing on the facts that demonstrate the settlor’s intent and addressing procedural requirements up front, we help families minimize delays and reduce the administrative burden associated with correcting title and trust records in Riverside County courts.
Our representation includes a comprehensive review of trust instruments and property records, personalized guidance on gathering supporting evidence, and management of the petition process from filing through court order recording. We coordinate necessary notices and handle procedural hurdles while keeping clients informed about timing and next steps. For Coachella residents, this localized understanding of court practices helps ensure filings meet the standards that judges expect and that corrected titles or court orders are implemented promptly.
Beyond the immediate petition, we advise trustees and families about follow-up items such as updating trust schedules, correcting beneficiary designations, and recording final orders to reflect new title positions. Our goal is to provide durable solutions that prevent future disputes and preserve the settlor’s plan. If a petition becomes contested, we prepare an organized factual record and pursue appropriate legal avenues to secure a favorable resolution in court while keeping administration moving forward whenever possible.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and related documents to identify omitted assets and evaluate available evidence of the settlor’s intent. We then gather necessary records, prepare a detailed petition and supporting declarations, and serve required notices to interested parties. After filing with the probate court, we monitor the case schedule, respond to inquiries, and appear at hearings if needed to present the evidence supporting inclusion of the assets in the trust. Once the court issues an order, we assist with recording or transmitting that order to financial institutions and title companies to update ownership records.
The first step is a thorough review of the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any contemporaneous writings. Creating a detailed inventory of omitted assets and their current title status is essential. This review identifies which items can be corrected through a Heggstad petition and which may require alternative procedures. We compile exhibits and draft declarations that explain the settlor’s intent and provide the factual foundation needed to support the petition in probate court.
Gathering original trust documents, deeds, and recorded instruments is a priority because these records form the primary evidence for the petition. We request copies of account statements, vehicle title information, and any transaction records that show ownership or transfer attempts. Accurate records enable us to match assets to trust provisions and craft a clear narrative for the court. When originals are unavailable, we work to obtain certified copies or alternative documentation acceptable to the court.
Interviewing trustees and family members helps uncover verbal directions and context for asset transfers that may not appear in documents. These conversations often reveal contemporaneous practices and decisions by the settlor that support inclusion of property in the trust. Clear, sworn declarations from those who witnessed the settlor’s intentions strengthen the petition. We document these statements and present them in a form the court recognizes to build a persuasive factual record for the requested declaration.
After assembling evidence, we draft a petition that describes each omitted asset, explains the factual basis for inclusion, and attaches supporting exhibits. The petition complies with local probate rules and specifies the relief requested, such as a judicial declaration that the property is trust property. We arrange for proper service on interested parties and file the petition with the appropriate Riverside County probate court. Careful drafting and thorough exhibits increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduce the chance of procedural objections.
Supporting declarations from trustees, family members, and professionals document the settlor’s intent, the chain of title, and any actions taken to transfer property. Exhibits might include trust pages, recorded deeds, account records, and correspondence. A well-organized exhibit packet helps the court quickly assess the merits of the petition. We prepare declarations that meet evidentiary standards and present facts under penalty of perjury to create a robust foundation for the requested court order.
Proper service of notice on beneficiaries, potential creditors, and other interested parties is required by probate rules and is closely tracked by the court. We prepare service documents, proofs of mailing or personal service, and any required publication if parties cannot be located. Compliance with these procedural requirements prevents delays and ensures the petition proceeds on a stable footing. Accurate tracking of service timelines is a critical administrative step that supports the petition’s validity in court.
Once the petition is filed and notices are completed, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the matter. We present the evidence and argue why the property should be recognized as trust property. If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order declaring the assets part of the trust. After obtaining the order, we assist in recording deeds, submitting orders to financial institutions, and updating account ownership to reflect the court’s decision so that trustees can proceed with administration without further title uncertainty.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition, declarations, and exhibits, and may hear testimony from witnesses. The focus is on whether the evidence supports the settlor’s intent to include the assets in the trust. We organize the factual presentation to make the judge’s review straightforward and to address likely questions about title history or transfer attempts. A clear and well-documented hearing record is essential to obtaining an order that resolves the omitted asset issues conclusively.
After the court enters an order recognizing the assets as trust property, the next step is to implement the order through recording or submission to relevant institutions. This may include recording corrected deeds, providing certified copies of the order to banks or brokerage firms, and updating vehicle registrations. Accurate execution of these tasks finalizes the transition of assets into the trust and assures trustees and beneficiaries that records reflect the trust’s holdings consistently across public and private registries.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing in California that asks a probate court to recognize property as part of an existing living trust when formal title transfer was not completed. The petition asserts that the settlor intended the property to belong to the trust, supporting that claim with the trust document, deeds, account records, and witness declarations. The court evaluates the evidence of intent and, if satisfied, issues an order declaring that the specified property is trust property, aligning records with the settlor’s plan and enabling trustees to manage or distribute the assets accordingly. This remedy is used when assets were overlooked during trust funding or when title formalities were not completed, but the settlor’s intent to include the items in the trust is reasonably documented. It is a targeted tool designed to correct administrative oversights without reopening the trust or initiating a full probate for those assets. The petition is particularly useful to preserve privacy and avoid separate probate proceedings for omitted items.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Riverside County varies depending on case complexity, completeness of documentation, and court schedules. A straightforward petition supported by clear deeds and trust provisions can often be prepared, filed, and heard within a few months, whereas contested matters or incomplete records may extend the process. Local court calendars and required notice periods also influence timing. Early preparation of exhibits and timely service of notices reduce avoidable delays and position the petition for prompt review by the court. If interested parties contest the petition or if additional discovery is necessary to resolve title questions, the matter can take longer to reach resolution. Preparing comprehensive declarations and coordinating with banks or title companies in advance helps shorten the timeline after filing. After the court grants an order, implementation tasks such as recording deeds and updating account records typically follow promptly, although processing times at external institutions can add days or weeks.
Various types of property can be addressed in a Heggstad petition, including real estate deeds, bank and brokerage accounts, certain vehicle registrations, and other titled assets that were intended for inclusion in the trust but were never retitled. The petition should describe each asset, present supporting documentation, and explain how the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Personal property and items without formal title may require different approaches, but tangible property that was clearly designated for the trust can often be addressed within the petition’s scope. Some assets, like retirement accounts with beneficiary designations or accounts that already have transfer-on-death instructions, may require different procedures or coordination with financial custodians. The petition process commonly focuses on assets where title or deed correction is necessary to align records with the trust. A careful inventory during intake helps determine which assets fit within the petition and which require alternative remedies.
When filing a Heggstad petition, the petitioner must provide notice to interested parties as required by probate rules. Typical recipients include trust beneficiaries, heirs-at-law, and known creditors who may have claims against the settlor’s estate. Proper service may involve personal delivery or mailed notices, and in some cases publication if parties cannot be located. The court expects compliance with service rules to ensure that those with a right to object have an opportunity to respond before the judge decides the petition. Failing to notify required parties can lead to delays or require re-filing, so careful attention to service and proof of service is essential. The types of required notice and the methods acceptable for delivery are governed by local rules, so understanding the specific requirements in Riverside County helps ensure the petition proceeds without procedural objections related to inadequate notice.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset was not intended for the trust or if they dispute the evidence of intent. Contested petitions may result in hearings where parties present testimony and documentary evidence. The court resolves factual disputes by weighing the available proof to determine whether the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust. Contests can extend the timeline and require more detailed preparation to address objections effectively. When a petition is contested, it is important to have clear declarations, corroborating documents, and a well-organized exhibit package. Engaging in early communication with potential objectors and attempting to resolve disagreements before formal litigation can sometimes prevent contested hearings. If resolution through agreement is not possible, the court will adjudicate based on the preponderance of evidence presented at the hearing.
Supporting a Heggstad petition usually requires substantial documentation demonstrating the settlor’s intent to include the property in the trust. Relevant items include the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, transaction records, and any written or recorded communications that show the settlor’s directives. Declarations from witnesses, trustees, or family members who observed the settlor’s planning decisions also strengthen the case. The more complete and organized the documentation, the more compelling the petition becomes for the court. In some instances, missing originals or gaps in records can be mitigated by consistent secondary evidence or credible witness declarations. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence, so a thoughtful compilation of documents and sworn statements is essential. When records are limited, additional steps such as obtaining certified copies, title abstracts, or affidavits can help build a persuasive factual record.
A Heggstad petition can prevent certain omitted assets from going through separate probate by obtaining a court declaration that they are trust property. When the court grants the petition, the assets are treated as part of the trust for administration and distribution, avoiding separate probate for those items. However, the petition applies to specific omitted assets and does not substitute for probate when other property belongs to the decedent’s estate or when issues fall wholly outside the trust’s purview. While a successful petition helps keep the relevant assets within trust administration, it does not eliminate the need for other estate administration steps when additional probate matters exist. The petition is a focused remedy to align title with trust interests and should be used as part of a broader estate administration strategy when necessary.
After the court grants a Heggstad petition, the next steps include obtaining certified copies of the order and implementing any recording or account changes required to reflect the court’s decision. This may involve recording corrected deeds with the county recorder, providing orders to banks or brokerage firms to change account ownership, and updating vehicle registrations where applicable. Completing these tasks ensures that title and records reflect the court’s declaration and that trustees can manage and distribute assets in accordance with the trust’s terms. The implementation phase also includes updating trust schedules and notifying beneficiaries that the issue has been resolved, enabling trustees to proceed with distributions or management decisions. Prompt follow-through with recording and institutional instructions prevents future confusion and helps ensure the trust’s holdings are accurately reflected across public and private records.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include pursuing probate for omitted assets, using a pour-over will to transfer property to the trust at death, or resolving title issues directly with financial institutions or title companies when possible. In some cases, negotiated settlements among beneficiaries or corrective deeds prepared and recorded with proper consent can address retitling without court involvement. The right alternative depends on asset type, availability of documentation, and whether interested parties agree on the intended ownership. When parties anticipate cooperation, administrative remedies such as corrective deeds or beneficiary designation updates may be quicker and less costly. However, when records are unclear, parties disagree, or institutions require a court order, a Heggstad petition provides a definitive legal route to resolve title and ensure assets are treated under the trust.
To start a Heggstad petition in Coachella, gather the trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any communications or records showing the settlor’s intent. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to arrange an initial review. During intake, we assess the documentation, identify omitted assets, and advise on the viability of a petition. A careful inventory and early coordination with financial institutions help accelerate the process and shape the petition’s evidentiary foundation. After the initial review, we prepare the petition, supporting declarations, and exhibit package, handle required notices, and file with the appropriate Riverside County probate court. We keep clients informed about timelines, service obligations, and next steps, and we assist with recording and institutional follow-up after the court issues an order to ensure titles and accounts are updated to reflect the trust’s holdings.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas