If you are considering a trust modification petition in Eastvale, this guide outlines what to expect and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help. A trust modification petition asks the court to permit changes to an existing trust when circumstances or intent require revision. This process involves legal strategy, careful drafting of proposed modifications, and attention to deadlines and notice requirements. Our firm focuses on practical solutions that preserve assets and honor your wishes while navigating the legal procedures and potential objections that can arise during petition proceedings.
Trust modification petitions can arise for many reasons, including changes in family circumstances, tax planning needs, or mistakes in the original trust document. This page explains the steps involved, common reasons to seek a modification, and how to prepare the necessary documentation for filing. We also describe how the courts review petitions and what evidence is typically required to show that a modification reflects the settlor’s intent or is justified by changed circumstances. Understanding these elements ahead of time helps you make informed decisions and reduces surprises during the process.
Filing a trust modification petition offers a way to update a trust when the original document no longer reflects the settlor’s intentions or circumstances have changed significantly. The benefits include restoring alignment between estate planning goals and current realities, clarifying trustee powers and beneficiaries, and addressing unintended tax consequences. A successful petition can prevent future disputes among beneficiaries and protect assets from being managed under outdated terms. Pursuing modification through the proper legal channels ensures that changes are documented, enforceable, and reflect the settlor’s genuine intent, reducing the likelihood of future litigation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services across California, including assistance with trust modification petitions in Eastvale and Riverside County. Our approach prioritizes clear communication, careful review of trust documents, and strategic planning to achieve practical results. We handle a range of trust matters such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and special needs trust concerns. Clients receive personalized attention to ensure filings are thorough, properly supported, and filed in the appropriate court, with notification and documentation handled according to local rules.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing that requests permission to change the terms of a trust. Grounds for modification may include a mistake in drafting, changes in family relationships, removal or substitution of trustees, or changes required for tax or asset protection purposes. The petitioner must present evidence to support why the modification is necessary, such as declarations, prior communications that reflect intent, or documentation of changed circumstances. The court will review whether the requested change is consistent with the settlor’s intent and whether it serves the interests of beneficiaries and creditors.
The petition process typically includes preparing a proposed modified trust, drafting a memorandum of points and authorities, and providing proper notice to interested parties. Opposing parties may contest the petition, leading to hearings where testimony and documentary evidence are presented. Timing and procedural requirements vary by county, so it is important to follow local court rules in Riverside County. Throughout the process, a careful evaluation of the trust document, relevant facts, and potential objections helps shape a persuasive petition that anticipates and addresses likely challenges.
A trust modification petition seeks judicial approval to change the terms of an existing trust when a direct amendment is not available or when circumstances make court approval advisable. This can apply to revocable trusts, irrevocable trusts under certain conditions, and situations where there is ambiguity in the original document. The petition must explain why the current terms are problematic and propose precise language for the change. The court evaluates the request against legal standards, including evidence of the settlor’s true intent, fairness to beneficiaries, and compliance with statutory requirements for modifications and trust administration.
Essential elements of a successful petition include a clear statement of the requested change, supporting factual declarations, the proposed revised trust document, and proof of notice to all interested parties. The process may require appraisal reports, tax analysis, or documentation of changed circumstances such as incapacity or family events. After filing, courts may schedule a hearing, mediate disputed issues, or allow for written responses. Effective petitions anticipate potential objections and provide legal authority and evidence to support the requested modification so that the court can make a reasoned determination.
Understanding commonly used terms helps demystify the petition process. Definitions clarify roles, procedural steps, and the types of documents involved in trust modification. Familiarity with these terms supports better communication with counsel and a clearer understanding of what to expect at each stage of the case, from filing through any hearings. The glossary below provides plain-language explanations for terms frequently encountered when pursuing a trust modification petition in California, with a focus on practical meaning and relevance to your situation.
The settlor is the person who originally created the trust and transferred assets into it. When a petition seeks to modify a trust, the settlor’s intentions and prior statements are central to the court’s evaluation. Evidence of the settlor’s intent can include the original trust language, contemporaneous communications, and actions taken after the trust was formed. Where the settlor is deceased or incapacitated, courts carefully consider objective documentation and the trust’s terms to determine whether a proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s probable wishes and the purpose of the trust.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for administering the trust and carrying out its provisions. A petition may request changes to trustee powers, removal or replacement of a trustee, or clarification of duties. The trustee has fiduciary responsibilities and must act in the best interests of beneficiaries. Courts review trustee conduct and the proposed modifications to ensure they preserve reasonable administration of the trust and protect beneficiary interests. Trustees are also typically required to be given notice of petitions that affect their role or responsibilities.
A beneficiary is someone who receives assets or benefits from a trust. Beneficiaries may object to proposed modifications if they believe changes reduce their interests or alter distributions unfairly. The court balances beneficiary rights with the settlor’s intent and broader equitable considerations, ensuring that any change is consistent with legal standards. Notice to beneficiaries is a key procedural requirement for petitions and objections may lead to hearings where beneficiaries can present evidence and arguments regarding the proposed modifications.
A proposed modified trust is the revised document submitted to the court that reflects the requested changes. It should be drafted with clear language showing exactly what will be altered, added, or removed. Courts prefer precise and legally effective amendments that address any ambiguities in the original document. Including the proposed modification as an exhibit helps the court visualize the requested outcome and reduces uncertainty about how the trust will operate after approval. Supporting declarations explain the factual basis and legal reasons for the revision.
When facing the need to change a trust, options include making an informal amendment (if the trust permits), executing a formal amendment signed by an authorized party, or filing a court petition to modify trust terms. Informal approaches can be faster but may not be binding or sufficient when an interested party objects. Court petitions provide judicial authority for changes but require additional time and proof. Mediation, settlement agreements among beneficiaries, or creating a new trust in limited circumstances may be viable alternatives. Which route is appropriate depends on the trust terms, settlor status, and beneficiary consent.
A limited amendment can be suitable when the change is minor and does not alter beneficiary entitlements or fundamentally change the trust’s purpose. Examples include correcting typographical errors, updating contact information, or clarifying administrative procedures for trustees. If all interested parties consent and the trust instrument authorizes amendments without court approval, a limited approach can save time and reduce costs. Nevertheless, it is important to document consent clearly and verify that any informal changes comply with the trust’s amendment provisions to avoid future disputes.
When beneficiaries and the trustee agree to a modification, they may be able to execute an amendment or enter into a settlement that reshapes trust administration without court involvement. Such agreements should be carefully documented and executed according to the trust’s terms and applicable law to ensure enforceability. Mutual agreement can be the fastest route to resolution, but it relies on full cooperation and a clear record to prevent later challenges. When disagreements or uncertainty exist, court approval may still be advisable to ensure finality and enforceability of the change.
If the settlor’s intent is ambiguous or beneficiaries dispute the meaning of trust provisions, a court petition provides an authoritative determination. Courts can interpret ambiguous language, reconcile conflicting evidence, and issue orders that resolve disputes. This judicial resolution reduces uncertainty and prevents ongoing litigation by producing a binding decision. Where evidence of intent is complex or contested, a well-prepared petition with supporting declarations and documentary proof improves the chance that the court will adopt a modification consistent with the settlor’s likely wishes.
When beneficiaries or creditors raise objections to a proposed amendment, filing a petition lets the court evaluate competing claims and determine whether the modification should be permitted. The judicial process includes notice, the opportunity for evidence and argument, and a reasoned ruling that balances competing interests. This structured approach protects the rights of all parties and helps ensure that any modification is legally valid and enforceable. It also creates a public record that confirms the change and reduces the potential for renewed disputes later.
A comprehensive, court-approved modification provides finality and legal authority for changes to a trust. Court approval reduces the likelihood of future challenges by documenting the factual and legal basis for the change. It also clarifies the enforceable terms of the trust going forward, which helps trustees administer assets with confidence and beneficiaries understand their rights. Judicial oversight can be particularly important where significant assets, tax considerations, or contested beneficiary interests are involved, since a binding order reduces uncertainties that could otherwise lead to protracted litigation.
Court involvement ensures that notice requirements, evidence standards, and procedural safeguards are met, which can protect vulnerable parties and provide a structured forum for resolving disagreements. This process often includes the submission of proposed orders and revised trust documents, creating a clear record of the trust’s post-modification terms. For clients seeking certainty and enforceability, the comprehensive approach can minimize future disputes and support orderly administration of trust assets in accordance with the court’s directives and the settlor’s intentions.
Having a modification approved by the court creates enforceable orders that trustees and beneficiaries must follow. This formal approval process preserves the integrity of the trust arrangement and reduces the risk that future parties will seek to relitigate the same issues. A binding court order also assists third parties, such as financial institutions, in recognizing and honoring the modified trust provisions. For many clients, the certainty that comes from judicial approval outweighs the additional time and procedural requirements involved in a petition.
Court-approved modifications provide a documented resolution that can deter later challenges and streamline future administration. When courts evaluate petitions, they consider evidence and legal authority, producing a reasoned decision that reduces ambiguity about the trust’s terms. This reduces the risk that beneficiaries, creditors, or other interested parties will successfully challenge the change. As a result, trustees can administer the trust with reduced risk, beneficiaries have clearer expectations, and the settlor’s intentions are more likely to be honored over time.
Start by gathering all documents related to the trust, including the original trust instrument, amendments, pour-over wills, financial account records, correspondence, and any prior trust-related filings. Documentation that evidences the settlor’s intent, such as letters, emails, or contemporaneous notes, can be particularly helpful. Early organization streamlines preparation of declarations and exhibits required for a petition, helps identify potential objections from beneficiaries, and supports a smoother filing process in court. Well-organized records make it easier to present a clear, persuasive case for the requested change.
Draft a concise, precise proposed modified trust that reflects exactly what changes are sought and why. Avoid vague language and include supporting declarations that explain the factual basis for the petition. Courts prefer to see a clean presentation of the new terms and the rationale for each change. A clear proposed document minimizes confusion and reduces the likelihood of remand or revision orders. Including suggested orders and a clean redline of changes helps the court and interested parties understand the scope and effect of the requested modification.
Consider a trust modification petition when the original trust no longer reflects the settlor’s current circumstances or intended distribution plan. Examples include remarriage, births, deaths, changes in asset values, or discovery of drafting errors that affect the trust’s operation. A petition may also be necessary when trustees require clarification of their powers or when beneficiaries are unable to agree on a proposed amendment. Seeking a formal modification can restore alignment between the trust’s terms and the settlor’s goals, and helps prevent future disagreements or administrative difficulties.
You might also pursue a petition to address tax planning opportunities, correct inadvertent omissions, or adapt the trust to new legal developments that affect its terms. If a trustee is not performing duties as intended or if external creditors pose a risk to trust assets, a court-approved modification can provide remedies. When changes have broad implications for beneficiary rights or trust administration, the judicial route ensures a clear, enforceable outcome that protects all parties and provides a reliable foundation for ongoing trust management.
Typical circumstances include changes in family structure such as divorce or remarriage, additions of new children or grandchildren, incapacity of the settlor, or the need to appoint or remove a trustee. Other situations include correcting drafting errors, responding to shifts in tax law, or clarifying charitable gifts and contingent distributions. Financial changes, such as sale or acquisition of major assets, may also require trust adjustments. Recognizing these triggers early helps property owners plan and seek timely relief through amendment or petition when appropriate.
Family events such as marriage, divorce, births, or deaths commonly prompt reconsideration of trust terms. These life changes can affect beneficiary designations, trustee selections, and distribution plans. When the original trust no longer reflects the settlor’s intentions in light of changed family dynamics, a petition can realign the trust with current wishes. Documenting the reasons behind requested changes and presenting clear supporting evidence helps courts evaluate the petition and determine whether a modification serves the settlor’s intent and the beneficiaries’ interests.
Drafting mistakes or omissions discovered after a trust is executed may make it necessary to correct the document to reflect the settlor’s real intentions. Errors can include ambiguous language, missing successor trustee designations, or incorrect asset descriptions. Where the settlor cannot simply execute a new amendment, a court petition can clarify, correct, or modify the trust. Supporting evidence that demonstrates the settlor’s original intent, such as contemporaneous notes or communications, strengthens the case for judicial approval of the requested correction.
Problems with trustee performance, conflicts of interest, or administrative impediments can prompt petitions to remove or replace a trustee or to clarify trustee powers. When trustees need explicit authority to act or when beneficiaries believe trustee conduct hinders proper administration, a petition provides a formal path to resolution. Courts consider whether proposed changes will improve administration and protect beneficiary interests. Proper documentation of trustee actions, accounting records, and specific issues helps support a petition that seeks to resolve administrative or fiduciary concerns.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Eastvale and throughout Riverside County with trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We assist with the preparation and filing of petitions, coordination of notices to interested parties, and representation through hearings if disputes arise. Our approach emphasizes clear documentation, timely filings, and practical solutions that reflect each client’s goals. If you are considering a trust modification petition, we can evaluate your situation, outline potential options, and help prepare the materials needed for a strong presentation to the court.
The firm offers focused attention on estate planning and trust matters, including trust modification petitions, pour-over wills, and related filings. Our practice handles a wide range of trust issues such as revocable living trusts, trust certification, and requests to modify trustee powers. Clients benefit from personalized guidance in preparing petition documents, coordinating notice and service, and presenting a clear factual record to the court. We prioritize communication and practical outcomes to help clients reach a resolution that aligns with their goals and legal obligations.
When planning or pursuing a trust modification, thoughtful preparation is necessary to address potential objections and legal requirements. Our firm assists with drafting proposed modified trust documents, preparing supporting declarations, and identifying evidence that demonstrates the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances. We also work with other professionals such as accountants or appraisers when financial or tax issues are involved, ensuring the petition is supported by appropriate documentation and analysis to present a persuasive case to the court.
Many clients appreciate having representation that understands local court procedures and the expectations of Riverside County courts. The firm helps clients comply with procedural rules, meet notice requirements, and present matters efficiently at hearings. Whether pursuing negotiated settlements or contested petitions, we focus on securing durable, enforceable outcomes that protect assets and clarify trust administration for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust documents and a fact-finding discussion to identify the reasons for modification and the parties involved. We then outline options, draft the proposed modified trust and supporting declarations, and prepare the petition and required notices. If needed, we coordinate additional evidence such as financial records or appraisals and file the petition with the appropriate court in Riverside County. We keep clients informed throughout, assist in settlement discussions, and represent clients at hearings to obtain the court’s approval of the proposed changes.
The initial stage involves reviewing the existing trust, related estate planning documents, and any relevant communications or records that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Identifying key parties, potential objections, and the legal basis for modification helps shape strategy. We determine whether an informal amendment is feasible or whether a court petition is necessary, and advise on supporting evidence and procedural requirements for Riverside County. This foundation ensures the petition is grounded in a clear factual and legal narrative.
We identify all interested parties including beneficiaries, trustees, and potential creditors, and assess the legal grounds supporting the requested change. Establishing why the modification is needed and what evidence will be offered allows the petition to be organized and convincing. Knowing the parties and likely responses enables tailored notice and reduces the chance of procedural challenge. Early identification of potential disputes also supports planning for settlement discussions or evidentiary hearings if objections arise during the court process.
This part of the process focuses on collecting declarations, correspondence, financial records, and any other documents that support the petition. A carefully drafted proposed modified trust and a memorandum explaining legal authority and factual support accompany the petition. Proper exhibits and declarations make it easier for the court to understand the rationale for the change. Attention to detail in drafting reduces the risk of procedural defects and helps the court issue a clear order if it approves the requested modification.
After preparing the petition and proposed documents, the next step is filing with the appropriate superior court in Riverside County and serving notice to all interested parties. Proper service and compliance with local rules are essential to avoid delays or objections based on procedural errors. The filing package typically includes a proposed order and exhibits. Once the court issues a hearing date, parties may exchange written responses or participate in mediation. Maintaining detailed records of service supports the petition’s procedural integrity.
We file the petition with the appropriate court and request a hearing date while ensuring all required filing fees and documents are included. A proposed order and the revised trust document are typically submitted as exhibits, and the court may set deadlines for opposition papers. Accurate calendaring and adherence to court timelines help move the case forward in an organized manner. The court’s scheduling also allows parties to attempt negotiated resolutions or prepare for a contested hearing if objections are filed.
Proper service to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties is essential. If objections are filed, we respond through written opposition or settlement discussions, and prepare for hearings if disputes are not resolved. Responding promptly and substantively to objections ensures the court receives a complete record for its decision. When appropriate, mediation can narrow contested issues and lead to agreement without a contested hearing, while also creating a documented pathway to a court-approved resolution.
At the hearing, the court considers evidence, hears arguments, and decides whether to approve the requested modification. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order and the proposed modified trust becomes the operative document for administration. Implementation may require transferring assets, updating account registrations, and providing copies of the order and trust to financial institutions. Ensuring compliance with the court’s order and completing administrative steps finalizes the modification and enables trustees to manage assets under the revised terms.
During the hearing, declarations, documents, and testimony support the case for modification while the court evaluates legal authority and fairness to beneficiaries. Clear presentation of the settlor’s intent, the reasons for change, and the proposed wording of the modification gives the court the basis for its determination. Preparedness for cross-examination and procedural questions helps maintain credibility and clarity at the hearing. If objections remain, the court will weigh competing arguments and render a decision based on the record presented.
Once the court issues an order approving the modification, the trustee and beneficiaries must implement the change by updating account registrations, transferring assets as directed, and providing required documentation to third parties. Filing the order and modified trust with appropriate institutions helps ensure the new terms are recognized and followed. Completing these administrative tasks promptly prevents confusion and supports consistent administration of the trust under the new terms.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the court to change the terms of an existing trust when an informal amendment is not available or when judicial approval is advisable. Reasons for filing include ambiguity in the trust language, unforeseen family changes, errors in drafting, or the need to adjust trustee powers. The petition must present a proposed revised trust and supporting evidence that explains why the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or is necessary due to changed circumstances. A court ruling makes the change legally enforceable and reduces the risk of future disputes. Whether a petition is necessary depends on the trust’s terms and the cooperation of interested parties. If all beneficiaries and the settlor (if capable) agree and the trust allows amendments without court intervention, an informal amendment may be possible. When parties disagree, when the settlor cannot act, or when the proposed change affects significant rights or tax implications, court approval provides finality and judicial authority. Filing a petition ensures procedural safeguards, proper notice, and a documented resolution recognized by third parties and financial institutions.
Timing varies depending on the complexity of the case, the court’s schedule, and whether objections arise. Simple petitions with full beneficiary agreement may be resolved more quickly, while contested matters that require hearings and evidentiary submissions can take several months. Local court calendars and procedural requirements in Riverside County influence hearing dates and filing schedules. Preparation time also includes gathering supporting documents, drafting the proposed modified trust, and coordinating notice to interested parties, which affects the overall timeline. If objections are filed, the process can extend further as the court may schedule additional hearings or require briefing. Mediation or settlement discussions can shorten the timeline if parties reach agreement. It is wise to plan for potential delays and to prepare a thorough record that anticipates likely objections to avoid unnecessary continuances or additional filings that could prolong resolution.
Yes, beneficiaries can object to a proposed modification, and their objections become part of the court record. When objections are filed, the court considers arguments from both sides, reviews evidence, and decides whether the requested modification is consistent with the settlor’s intent and statutory requirements. Objections may prompt hearings where testimony and documents are presented, and the court evaluates whether the change should be approved, modified, or denied based on the evidence and legal standards. If disputes persist, the court may encourage or require mediation to narrow contested issues, or it may rule after a contested hearing. Proper notice and timely responses are essential in these circumstances to preserve rights and present a full factual record. Preparing to address potential beneficiary concerns in the petition and supporting declarations helps the court evaluate and resolve disputes efficiently.
Not always. Some trusts include explicit amendment provisions that allow the settlor or authorized parties to make changes without court involvement. When all interested parties agree to a modification and the trust permits such amendments, an informal amendment or a signed written modification may be sufficient. However, where the settlor cannot act, where beneficiaries disagree, or when the modification affects significant interests, court approval often provides the most reliable path to a binding, enforceable change. Choosing between an informal amendment and a court petition depends on the trust language, the parties’ willingness to cooperate, and the potential for future disputes. When in doubt, seeking a court order can provide clarity and finality, especially if the changes have substantial legal or financial consequences or if third parties need assurance that the modification is valid and enforceable.
Courts generally require evidence that supports the proposed modification, such as declarations that explain the settlor’s intent, contemporaneous writings, and documentation of changed circumstances. The court will want to see a clear proposed modified trust, factual support for why the change is needed, and proof that interested parties were properly notified. Where ambiguity exists, the court examines objective evidence and legal principles to determine whether the modification aligns with the settlor’s likely wishes or is justified by changed conditions. When claims of mistake or misinterpretation are involved, supporting evidence might include drafts, correspondence, or testimony that clarifies the settlor’s intent at the time the trust was created. Financial records and appraisals can be relevant when asset valuation affects distributions. Comprehensive documentation strengthens the petition and helps the court reach a reasoned decision based on the record presented.
Modifying a trust can have tax consequences depending on the nature of the changes and the types of assets involved. For example, modifications that affect the dispositive scheme or beneficiary interests may impact estate or gift tax considerations. Changes that involve retirement accounts, life insurance, or trusts designed for tax planning should be reviewed with tax implications in mind. It is important to analyze the tax effects before finalizing modifications and to coordinate with financial advisors or tax professionals when necessary. Courts do not typically provide tax advice, so petitions that involve potential tax consequences benefit from including professional analyses or declarations that explain the anticipated effects. Addressing tax considerations early in the process helps ensure the proposed modification aligns with broader estate planning goals and avoids unintended liabilities for beneficiaries or the trust itself.
Yes. A petition can ask the court to remove or replace a trustee when the trustee is failing to perform duties, acting in conflict with beneficiaries’ interests, or otherwise unfit to serve. The petition should identify the grounds for removal and propose a successor trustee or describe the process for appointing one. Courts assess whether removal would benefit the administration of the trust and protect beneficiary interests, balancing concerns about disruption against the trustee’s conduct and the needs of the trust estate. Documented evidence of mismanagement, breaches of fiduciary duty, or incapacity strengthens a petition seeking trustee removal. Where removal is contested, the court will hear evidence from both sides and decide whether the trustee should be replaced. Proposing an orderly transition plan and a qualified successor can assist the court in ordering a replacement that ensures continued trust administration.
Costs vary based on the complexity of the petition, the need for hearings, and whether matters are contested. Typical expenses include attorney preparation time, filing fees, service costs, and potential fees for appraisers or other professionals. Contested matters that require multiple hearings, depositions, or extensive briefing will be more costly than straightforward petitions agreed to by all parties. Planning and early organization can reduce unnecessary expense by limiting disputes and focusing the court’s attention on the necessary issues. Some clients pursue negotiation or mediation to resolve disputes and reduce litigation costs, while others proceed to contested hearings when necessary. Discussing anticipated costs and potential strategies up front allows for budgeting and decision-making that aligns with both financial realities and the desired outcome for the trust modification.
Notifying beneficiaries and interested parties is a legal requirement in most trust modification proceedings. Proper notice ensures parties have an opportunity to object and participate in the process. Notices typically include a copy of the petition, the proposed modified trust, and information about hearing dates. Serving notice according to statutory and local court procedures is important to prevent procedural challenges that could delay the court’s consideration or require refiling of documents. Carefully documenting service and maintaining proof of delivery are essential. Where parties live out of state or are difficult to locate, the law provides alternatives for notice that must be followed precisely. Early coordination around notice requirements helps keep the case on schedule and reduces the risk that a missed notification will impede court approval of a legitimate modification.
If you discover a mistake or omission in your trust, begin by gathering documentation that shows what was intended and how the error affects trust administration. Determine whether the trust authorizes an amendment by the settlor or other designated parties. If an informal correction is possible and all interested parties agree, the issue may be resolved without court involvement. When the settlor cannot act or agreement is not possible, filing a petition to correct the mistake provides a formal route for the court to make the necessary changes. Collecting contemporaneous evidence, such as drafts, correspondence, or statements of intent, supports a petition that seeks to correct errors. Prompt action is important to prevent ongoing administration under incorrect terms and to limit potential disputes. Seeking guidance early helps clarify the appropriate path to correct mistakes while minimizing disruption to trust administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas